samX500 wrote:
Endaris wrote:
samX500 wrote:
abraker wrote:
you don't know how to feel about this
but you weren't there when the holy leg thread was decapitated at its height by the ruthless seagull
Wow I didn't even notice. This truly is a tragedy.
It was way before your time.
Didn't someone post a leg thread a week ago?
Pretty basic hand imo. Nice nails, could use a bit of trimming though. It looks like you rubbed your middle finger knuckle on your desk really hard and burned it. I did that in 4th grade one time and game myself a little scar. Also, your thumb gives me anxiety.Captain Picard wrote:
keep the hand thread alive
basic hand. Your fingers seem a little bit proportionally small, might just be the angle though. Off-topic, but your tattoo seems cool.[ - Zekks - ] wrote:
why? what am I looking at here?levesterz wrote:
Absolutely Beautiful! Great vascularity, really nice fingernails. That mole is adorable, wowee.henry11hei wrote:
Wow that took longer then I thought
Your fingers look like they suffer from Gigantism. Fingernails are little short for my liking. I like your hands though overall.[Ska] wrote:
ok but im still looking for the toe thread
4/10Penguin wrote:
Nice tendons and vascularity. Fingers and fingernails are way too long and skinny for my liking though.Nate Bait wrote:
slight necroed this :l
part 1
part 2: the other side
I like them! Nice nails, great vascularity. Finger to hand proportions are good. I used to have that exact same watch until I left it at my friends housejohnmedina999 wrote:
I forgot to take pictures today hehe
I'll post last year's pictures, and I for sure will post new pics tomorrow.
clean your fingernails plsKatouMegumi wrote:
Very nice. Would probably be a lot better with some vascularity, but oh well.subbie6 wrote:
Your hand seems kinda small compared to your fingers. Could just be the cropping of your picture, but idk.eblf2013 wrote:
HÆND
Your nails are waaaay too long for my liking. Finger are kinda long too, but not bad.click squares wrote:
ok
pretty basic, not much going on here. There's no real definition, but proportions are pretty good.Rizevim wrote:
You're very right, nice and smooth! Nice proportions, decent tendons.q9za wrote:
I'm smooth boi
Ayo, thanks for the compliments. I wish you a great career in hand rating. You'll make a great doctor :^DPenguin wrote:
You're very right, nice and smooth! Nice proportions, decent tendons.
I was planning on doing that to make it easier for me to maintain an accurate rating standard. I'm just lazy and haven't set aside the time on doing so yet, lmaoAshton wrote:
Would it be possible to link the persons hand with their rating? Would that be too much work?
it's never too much effort for the wonderful hand thread.q9za wrote:
It's too much effort, discovering hands and rating them yourself is part of the fun.
yup, and now that I've had a chance to compare all the submissions side by side I have adjusted a few scores.Ashton wrote:
that was quicker than i thought. nice
the color of your hands makes it look kinda bad. I assume you used the eraser in the back before you took this shot. It feels as if your colors on your hands were as if you just got back from punching your hand into a wall for an hour. However I will admit that you have a good palm and fingers weight ratio that goes well together. The fingernails are too short for my liking as it looks like a garbled piece of mess. You however have a good amount of hair on your hands. It's not too much in which you look like you got bit by a werewolf but not too little where your skin is just see-through and you can see all of your tendons.samX500 wrote:
yesAshton wrote:
DID THOU RATE THY HAND WITHOUT PENGUINS PERMISSION?
the color of your hand is fine, it just seems like it's cold when you took the picture. Nice amount of hair, not too much which is perfect. Fingernails are a little stubby, but not terrible.samX500 wrote:
I'm still rating your hand from all those months ago. Please do not rush the rating process, it is a very delicate ordeal and any little interruption can throw me off. You will get your rating in due time.abraker wrote:
I like how my hand is still not considered a hand lol
here's is the wiki page for standard rankings. I'm just using the standard competition-style ranking.Ashton wrote:
Hey technically im third right? Since second place is tied? You have me as 4th atm
did you take inspiration for those puns from ot!neus?abraker wrote:
I gotta hand it to you, you handling this seriously well
Haha... true!abraker wrote:
it's a tall order to be bombing threads and stealing faces and still say you have a heart
I'll make sure to scoop up the non existent remains if I find any
I didn't know you had such vulgar thoughts about me.abraker wrote:
it's a tall order to be bombing threads and stealing faces and still say you have a heart
I'll make sure to scoop up the non existent remains if I find any
Even though it may seems interesting, I have no interest on the story of how you're searching for your pee pee mister abraker.abraker wrote:
You should at least be happy I am going through the trouble of search for something that's not there
I'm unsatisfied with my 4/10Penguin wrote:
Hey guys. Quick update (bump)
This thread got buried pretty deep and I'm seeing a few new faces around OT. If you're new and would like to participate, here's your chance.
I understand that it can be hard to come to terms with your hand rating. It's one of those things in life that you cannot control. This thread is a shame-free environment, so no need to feel down. We're here to support you.eblf2013 wrote:
I'm unsatisfied with my 4/10Penguin wrote:
Hey guys. Quick update (bump)
This thread got buried pretty deep and I'm seeing a few new faces around OT. If you're new and would like to participate, here's your chance.
I would love to work on this thread more, but unfortunately it's not up to me whether people decide to participate or notTad Fibonacci wrote:
This thread was great, please revive it!
that's a no noWinnyace wrote:
feet thread wh- actually, I'm sorry for saying that.
That keyboard, ew.axl2468 wrote:
sweet, an excuse to show my hand to the world.here it is
and before you say it, yes, my fingers are smol.
I know my cable management's shit, shaddap
sorry, broke rnTad Fibonacci wrote:
That keyboard, ew.axl2468 wrote:
sweet, an excuse to show my hand to the world.here it is
and before you say it, yes, my fingers are smol.
I know my cable management's shit, shaddap
Your hands look so similar to marijuana's that I almost thought you plagiarized his image lmao.axl2468 wrote:
sweet, an excuse to show my hand to the world.here it is
and before you say it, yes, my fingers are smol.
I know my cable management's shit, shaddap
holy shit you're right lolPenguin wrote:
Your hands look so similar to marijuana's that I almost thought you plagiarized his image lmao.axl2468 wrote:
sweet, an excuse to show my hand to the world.here it is
and before you say it, yes, my fingers are smol.
I know my cable management's shit, shaddap
I'm gonna have to give you a 3/10
Yes and no. Vascularity plays a big part in my ranking criteria, but it's not the only thing that matters. Overall hand/finger proportions, knuckle and tendon visibility, hairiness, fingernail length, and sometimes fingernail cleanliness... please guys... keep your nails clean.eblf2013 wrote:
So, judging by the highest rated hands... The veinier the better.
nice one.Penguin wrote:
these things go hand in hand.
you mean rating hands? I think only like 3 or 4 people IRL know of my fascination for hands. It'd be kinda weird to go to everyone I know and ask if I can admire their hands lmaoeblf2013 wrote:
I wonder if penguin has done this irl.
EDIT: Oh, I have just discovered r/manhands for all kind of hand affairs.
That keyboard, ew._ralsei wrote:
hand
i never cleaned it for like a year. i probably should have thoughTad Fibonacci wrote:
That keyboard, ew._ralsei wrote:
hand
Abraker's handabraker wrote:
And so we continue to wonder whether my hand will ever be rated
Nice proportions overall. Not much vascularity or tendon visibility, but I'm pretty sure you could easily achieve nice vascularity in different conditions._ralsei wrote:
hand
I've said this before, you cannot rush perfection. I am STILL, to this day, working on your rating for your hand. Work like this takes time.abraker wrote:
And so we continue to wonder whether my hand will ever be rated
can't really tell what's going on here due to the glove. I don't see much vascularity, tendon visibility, or any defining features.nedd83 wrote:
rate my osu! gaming hand:
why do i use a glove? well, because my hands sweat and get stuck to the tablet surface
Penguin wrote:
keremal's long-standing record of "lowest-rated hand in OT" has finally been broken. It has been 20 months since I rated keremal's hand. Kere held the record since day one, but no longer does he hold that claim.Akumace wrote:
Dumb mistakes and bad genetics
sorry 1/10
I'm not gonna be able to rate your hand based off this image. I can only see like, half of your handWinnyace wrote:
here's my puny little hand
made it into an URL bc the aspect ratio on the forums is wrong and it pisses me off
proportions are fine, but you're lacking defining features, such as you guessed it vascularity and whatnot.Winnyace wrote:
pardon me. here's the best photo I took of my hand, hopefully it is good enough.
still bad aspect ratio, I wonder why tho
abraker wrote:
what?
yes, that's fine. I actually use this method all the time.placeholder wrote:
Is it okay to enhance vascularity by gravity assisted fluid redistribution?
it's a thing, trust meabraker wrote:
what?
Aren't we all?Tad Fibonacci wrote:
I'm still waiting for abraker's rating btw.
i did trim index and mid for osu lmaoJonarwhal wrote:
plz trim ur nails :<
besides that its nice tho
patienceTad Fibonacci wrote:
I'm still waiting for abraker's rating btw.
proportions are good. vascularity is decent. Your hands seem kind of dry, maybe some lotion would help you out. It could just look that way due to the lighting though, I'm not sure. Also, clip your nails. Waaaay too long and uneven.Cerno wrote:
bored af in school dormitory, might as well post one lmao
why would a rating affect your handsabraker wrote:
my hands are so delicate that their rating needs to be judged to the nearest bazillionth digit
1.1/10Tad Fibonacci wrote:
Okay, I've already posted my hands here a couple of times already so I'm not gonna do that anymore.
I don't think it'll get a higher score.
However, I'd like to introduce you gents to this here.
