well, some clarification then
02:56:785 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - isn't too bad, I still think it's oversimplified when the song does something so unique, but I guess you can argue current thing with 1/1 emphasis on vocals
03:07:487 (1,2,1,2,1,2) - maybe this wasn't worded clearly enough, the rhythm itself wouldn't be too bad if the patterning actually focused on the red ticks since then it would make sense as "emphasizing" vocals like you said, but putting a white tick focused 1/2 spam pattern here just doesn't seem reasonable. for example something like
https://i.imgur.com/3jMK5iD.jpg could actually work (I'm not talking about only changing the comboing, but also adjusting movemetn/patterning to focus on these ticks). I never said 1/2 circle spam isn't acceptable here, just the focus of it feels completely off.
basically what was done on 03:37:163 (1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2,3) - which is also circle spam, but actually follows the melody by focusing on the red ticks, seems more fitting
03:04:244 (1,2,3,4) - my issue wasn't them being mapped to nothing, but the rhythm choice not following anything in particular since everything is mapped as a circle jump, kinda similar to last point
01:31:488 (1,2,1,2,1,2) - basically has the same problem as ^ where it just ends up ignoring the offbeat emphasis in the song which makes it feel out of place, just like many other similar things
I think we can both agree that mapping sounds in the song =/= mapping the song
and also that mapping sounds not in the song =/= not mapping the song
it's just that the both of these ideas aren't really well executed, as mentioned before
this should clear up some things at least
also can we not get too hung up on wording as long as it doesn't go into personal attacks or straight up insults?
and a last friendly reminder to stay on topic instead of posting nonsense that doesn't contribute in any way (@seni, voli)