Litharrale wrote:

hiiiiiiiiiiiiii haaaaaaa
only mentioning each issue once
1|2|3|4

fix diff names already>:0 ay

I remade your bg to be better, use this one https://i.imgur.com/f2T1PRX.jpg (or the one altered from discord) I prefer my fog-ish :c

I am 99% sure the timing resnap at 00:18:151 is mistimed and not needed. The map sounds perfect without it and with it, everything is slightly late. (note: the whole mod is done without this changed but you should 100% change it or ask someone super experienced with timing to check it) i'll try to ask around

The SR jump between Hyper and Another is significantly bigger than the rest of the SR gaps

The gap between the two is actually only weighted at - 01:47:821 - and - 02:22:107 - whilst the rest is a pretty fair diff gap inbetween

Get rid of all storyboard hitsounds and all double hitsounds

First off, double hitsound is pretty fair if the volume is well distributed (and its not earrape lol). I use all of these techniques in all of my latest maps and there doesnt seem to be much of a problem

the second, about the SB hs. I think this is pretty fair since all the bassline have at least one note to cover. take example on the beginner
00:18:151 - these part afterwards is filled with 2 synths and 1 kick. the synths is on SB to accompany and emphasize the songs. since beginner would naturally hit 1/1 focus kick so they wouldnt be confused with the 2 synths being played as SB. rather, some of the newbie players i asked to test didnt realize that there was an additional synths on SB. they thought it was original song fx

things may got complicated after - 02:01:008 - and - 02:14:194 - in which drumline didnt match my notes which could be confusing, but the song drumline itself is confusing already to follow by newbies so removing the SB hs here wouldnt do much either

tl;dr i dont want to remove the SB because
1) it would remove some special emphasisi which was intended
2) removing the SB hs wouldnt do much either. if you play the song with fx or without the fx, they wouldnt be much different. the only thing different with fx enabled is that you will hear a higher volume version of the original fx from the song

Hitsound base

02:46:172 (166172|4) - These tick sounds are a nice addition but they should be used one 4 beats apart rather than 3 beats. 3 beats sounds really weird and doesnt really fit imo. On the second beat of every bar would be good. the tick is slightly 1 seconds apart. thus the clock - like - fx being used is properly make sense

Ultimate

00:22:766 (22766|0,22766|1) - A tonne of double hitsounds which theres probably a lot of in the diffs. Remove them all pls explained above

00:01:648 (1648|2) - is a chord in the song so add another note here

00:19:469 (19469|1,19469|3,19469|0) - Having this as a triple detracts from the power of this 00:19:799 (19799|2,19799|0,19799|3) - which should be a triple. remove the note in col 2 both is a snare, though its different in volume power but having it to be a double would be kinda misleading as the doubles are for kicks

00:39:579 (39579|1) - https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/9079331 proposed pattern for better PR mapping not so sure with the balance there. especially that 4|3|4|3 at the beginning

00:43:205 (43205|0) - https://i.imgur.com/FlOkYz7.png A lot of emphasis on col 1, maybe break it up a bit in the middle

01:01:337 (61337|0) - add another note on col 4 for the chord i think its not worthy of a chord since its pretty softy

01:03:975 (63975|0) - same, you get the point ^

01:16:008 (76008|3,76049|2,76090|1,76131|0) - You should redesign this stream to map this "gulp" sound more. Perhaps a 1/2 LN and a 1/4 LN to capture it

01:21:777 (81777|1) - Add something for the snare sound to stay consistent

01:30:843 (90843|1) - add a note on 2 and 01:31:172 (91172|2,91337|1,91337|0,91337|3) - add a note between these to capture the full percussion pattern i'm not really following the percussion here. my main follow is a piano

01:40:238 (100238|0,100238|1,100568|0,100568|1,100898|0,100898|1,101227|0,101227|1,101557|0,101557|1) - This pattern is weird when you dont continue it on the other side. Either swap it out for something else or change the pattern after it to be similar in theme

02:06:859 (126859|0,126859|1,126942|0,126942|2,126942|3) - This jack feels really weird. It kind of just pops up 2 minutes into the map without any other jacks before it. I'd remove it. well its because there is no fx that could accompanied to make a minijack like this, wouldnt it? :d so its totally relevant

02:08:590 (128590|3) - Shorten this LN to reflect the sound that starts halfway through. I was gonna start start the LN halfway through when the sound starts but the SV makes it feel weird i'm pretty sure the bass noise is started where i placed. the halfway you mentioned is where the bass got stronger

02:44:524 (164524|2,164524|3,164524|1,164524|0) - Doesn't sound strong enough to be a quad here imo. remove the note on 3 i think i'm keeping this. idk its personally fits towards where everything will got harder

Another

00:27:711 (27711|0,27711|3) Making these triples is completely a-ok for a 4.4* particularly i want to keep the layering consistency with the other. the triples only used where there's no LN

00:41:722 (41722|2) - Could change this isnt an LN that leads to the triples, would play awesomely

00:47:738 (47738|2) - note here thats not in ultimate?

00:49:799 (49799|2) - the 3-4 here plays kinda weird, maybe just remove the 3 not rly sure i would do that since that will kinda distinguish the cymbal emphasis

00:56:990 (56990|1,57113|3,57278|1,57443|0) - Why are these 1/16? Should be 1/6 dafuq i'm screwed

00:57:711 (57711|1) - no where near strong enough for a double its kinda for the following 1/6 you've pointed before

01:22:107 (82107|1) - https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/9079859 literally copy pasted from the ultimate, try make the patterns a little harder/easier in one of them wait i dont remember i copasta aaaaaa. made ultimate different

01:35:623 (95623|0) - section feels boring and uninspired tbh. Try adding in a cool theme like have the two beats before the snare be the same and then the snare be different or something like that e.g https://i.imgur.com/qd6S0ER.png i did something with some light jacking piano

01:42:216 (102216|3) - why does the stack theme start here and not earlier/later? this to keep everything various, the earlier has different theme which tend to be simple, then it goes harder with introducing the stacks towards the jtrill and streams later

01:59:359 (119359|3,119359|2,119524|1,119524|3,119524|0) - This is harder than the ultimate equivalent

02:08:178 (128178|2,128260|2) - jacks again. if you kept them in the ultimate, definitely get rid of them here.

Hyper

00:16:400 (16400|1,16441|2,16483|3,16483|0) - This pattern feels like it belongs in the higher diffs. I think a simple 4-3-21 stair would work better i think its still pretty fair since hyper still on its 3 highest diff which is still pretty simple to handle by intermediate players

00:24:579 (24579|1) - seems like an odd choice to shorten this by 1/4 just to keep the next LN in the same column but it seems pretty ok to me :c see higher diffs

00:29:194 (29194|3) - https://i.imgur.com/jUFuntR.png the pattern here is significantly harder than the one in the another, id suggest changing to a stair

00:35:623 (35623|0) - only 1/1 doubles after trusting the player to do jumpstreams? yeah people need to relax xd

00:42:381 (42381|1,42381|3,42711|2,42711|1) - these should be singles to be consistent consistent with... what? if you refering hyper2 its totally different diff so there's that

01:21:777 (81777|2) - single for the snare? >:00000000 its still a pretty low snare imo so single fit pretty well

01:23:755 (83755|2) - srsly though, you have random bass doubled even though they're weaker, it's an odd choice

01:26:722 (86722|0) - should really be 1/4 of a tick back to match up with the strong sound. Otherwise the bass is uneven and it doesnt match with the identical sound here 01:26:392 (86392|0,86392|3) - for both ^ i kinda didnt intend to doubled the snare since its a pretty weak snare in general and intended to keep the diff curve with hyper2. the doubled bass is because there's a deep bass in it. which where the snare doesnt have it.
thus the idea. exception to - 01:27:711 (87711|2,87711|3) - where the snare is matched with piano

01:39:909 (99909|2) - add singles on the red ticks in this section to match with the increase in intensity but i was follows piano :cc

01:49:140 (109140|0,109387|0) - This reverse shield plays weird as hell, maybe something like https://i.imgur.com/10GeqSF.png it doesnt on my side lol stop using imgur rip my data :c

Hyper2

01:19:799 (79799|3) - You mapped the sound here but not the one here 01:20:788 - make it all consistent its actually piano but i did forget to place it anywhere else so fixed that

Same section 01:25:074 (85074|2) - mapping the snares sometims and other times not is super weird ^

01:46:832 (106832|3) - This section is the same density as the beginner and half as dense as the standards oh ups

01:50:458 (110458|0) - This LN should stop around here 01:51:777 and transfer into a different LN, can apply this to other diffs as well

02:01:008 (121008|0,121008|2,121337|0,121337|2,121832|2,121832|0,122244|0,122244|2) - I really like the theme you had before this pattern here 01:59:030 (119030|2) - with all the doubles in the same columns but at 02:01:008 it doesnt really fit and detracts from the pattern

Standard2

00:32:986 (32986|1,32986|3,33151|1,33151|3) - Put these on the same hand for difficulty, I feel like a jack like this in a diff this low is a little too hard

00:49:799 (49799|0) - This section is 1/4 not 1/3 (it is 1/3 but the LNs start every beat)

01:10:898 (70898|2,70898|3,71392|1,71392|2,71887|0,71887|1) - PR!

02:07:436 (127436|3,127931|3,128260|3) - Fairly sure these are meant to be doubles looking at the distance inbetween the note which is pretty odd to be predicted by newer players, i made this a little bit simplier

02:09:579 (129579|2) - Move to 3 to avoid the reverse shield its already on 3 :thonk:

02:10:486 (130486|0) - Double? most of these are doubles but some arent which is odd

03:05:788 (185788|3) - move to 3 to disconnect it with the previous pattern as its not part of it in the music

Beginner

Not much to say other than a bunch of missed PR opportunities in sections like 00:34:304 (34304|0) -

01:16:008 (76008|1) - This part is significantly harder than standard(2) https://i.imgur.com/B4F5pgO.png

Litharrale wrote:

hiiiiiiiiiiiiii
only mentioning each issue once
1|2|3|4

A's standard

(note some of these timestamps might be off because this is when i realised the timing was wrong)

00:16:359 (16359|3,16400|2,16483|1) - This is timed different to all of the other difficulties, talk to rivals and figure out what it should be at // ok i fixed it

00:18:315 (18315|2) - This sections patterning feels unnatural, lots of repeated patterns and patterns not really suited for a standard like 00:26:227 (26227|3,26310|2,26392|3,26557|0,26640|1,26722|0) - // uhh... from where do you see it not suited if i may ask? i think that pattern are pretty much suited for novice player to learn something new

00:33:975 (33975|1) - Add a note since it's a super strong sound // as you can see here. i dont use any dual at all.. so any suggestion about adding more note to make dual are rejected, sorry

00:34:469 (34469|3) - I understand what you're trying to do in this section but it's really slow and boring due to how sparse it is. Even the beginner is more dense // FYI, 00:49:799 - this is the reason why i left it like that. i want to make a rest point before i give them the stream

01:11:887 (71887|1) - Col 3 for pitch relevancy // uhh.. no.. the key are (from what i heard here) like this

01:13:453 (73453|0) - Remove, neither of the hypers have this note, 01:13:205 (73205|3) - extend this to the white tick. If you dont want to do this (i'd rather you not) just make it a lot more clear in the patterning. What you did on the LN right before it here https://i.imgur.com/V0fIWdP.png is a good example //uhh... no thankyou

01:32:821 (92821|2) - same comment as before. boring because super sparse like you have gaps of >1 measure 01:35:623 (95623|1,97766|2) . add something else in // same reason as before

01:40:898 (100898|1) - add something even more in for this section to reflect the increase in intensity // no

01:46:008 (106008|2) - https://i.imgur.com/tFjm2CL.png (right is hyper2) the spread between this and the hyper2 is wew // cant open imgur, sorry (blocked here)

02:20:458 (140458|0,140541|1,140623|2,140705|1,140788|3,140953|1) - This pattern feels very weird to play, smooth it out a bit (or get rid of it because the hyper has no 1/4 rhythms here) // no

02:46:585 (166585|3) - big gap in col 4 after this note // keep it

02:53:178 (173178|3) - same here (dont do this) // ^

02:57:711 (177711|3) - again, theres no reason for these large gaps // yes there's a reason for that i cant explain it

Protastic101 wrote:

replying mods are a social construct

[General]

1. Might wanna increase HP of As' Intermediate to 7.5 or something cause there's a bunch of little 1/4 rolls that the player won't really be punished for if they miss a lot in.
2. Spent about 20 minutes checking that every sample in the folder was used and it is T_T)b tfw cant keysound

[Ultimate]
00:17:162 - This SV is a 0.4x average cause math but the normalizing of this section is 0.8x. You'll want to average the SV sequence to 0.8x as a result to avoid changing up the reading on the player at last second and forcing them to adjust to a new scroll for only three beats. What you can do is something like this (adds up to 9.6/12 to get 0.8x average)

1. 00:17:162 - 0.3x
2. 00:17:821 - 0.5x
3. 00:17:904 - 1.2x
4. 00:17:986 - 2.0x
5. 00:18:069 - 3.5x

edit: i change my mind to keep it. the reason is the scrool going in a really fast pace that the player wont even see they coming so they dont have the reflex to the upcoming pattern. so far my SVs the prolly best choice for being readable

00:31:090 (31090|2,31255|2,31420|2,31585|2,31749|2,31914|2,32079|2,32244|2) - The stack here gets pretty long and repetitive while everything else has been a fairly short trill so far. I'd try to break it at 00:31:502 - ish like this https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/9419284

00:32:986 - Imo, a bump using four units (1/8 snap) would have been better for emphasis as it sends the next note flying towards the player which represents the sudden stop in the music or smth i dunno.
00:33:151 - I'd apply the same thing here. if i'm not misunderstanding this, you wish me to go by 1,5 -> 0,83 on 1/8 interval from 4/8 snaps? its kinda didnt suit the bump you've been said. i honestly rather go like my current one as the bump are more noticeable to read

00:35:458 (35458|1,35788|1,36118|1,36447|1,36777|1,37107|1,37436|1,37766|1) - Long stack and also a lot of back and forth on the left hand. Not sure if it's intentional, but I dont think it is cause the following measure at 00:37:931 - only has a measure long stack before changing columns

00:40:898 - 00:41:227 - 4 - 1.8 = 2.2 / 3 = 0.733x as your final SV for these two timestamps listed. The current average is 1.125x which is inconsistent with the current normalizing SV of 1x. As a side note though, I think the placement of the SV is a bit odd. It would make more sense to put them on the downbeat rather than the 1/4 line before as the downbeat is where the sound comes in full force, though I think it's fine. You do need a normalizing SV at 00:41:475 - or you'll have to make the SV average with 5 units instead of 4. this is kinda intended to make the SVs more bumpy friendly towards mini LN.
if i put the starting value at the downbeat, the LN will become visually longer than what the noise should represnt so it'll kind of misleading that way

00:49:634 - I'd consider adding a note here to represent the height of the sound after which it kind of just tapers off into silence.

01:07:436 - to 01:07:931 - 1.15x average, although since you're kind of getting at a speed up for 01:07:931 - , I'd keep the average to 1x instead so the player will be accustomed to a 1x average at 01:07:931 - . Something like this would work (each value only lasts one unit)

01:10:568 - Think it'd be nice here to have a similar but probably weaker SV like the one at 01:07:931 - as the cut off is very sudden but the sound is rather weak with it only being a kick.

01:49:675 - Concerning this burst, I disagree with upping the note density rather than the rhythm here. Essentially, col 2 and 3 have all the minijacks with the outer columns in 1 and 4 only having 3/8 rhythms which are still pretty harder to predict. What I think would have worked better here is a single note roll of 1/12 going into 1/16 at 01:50:129 - , like so https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/9419329 . Or, you could add jumps to the 1/12 rather than using 1/16 which gets really dense really fast https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/9419337 changed for now, might change back to 1/8js if people getting to disagree with this. (though i know the burst is 1/12 justified lul but meh maniaq)

01:53:755 - Edgy SVs, I couldn't be any prouder tbh yos

01:55:115 - 01:55:280 - tfw not 1x average reeee. Make 0.4x to 0.5x or make the 2.5x to 2.8x and leave the 0.4x.
01:59:359 - ^ Also, is there any reason for this one to start with the slow value first and fast value second when the first time it occured was a simple fast -> slow bump? Makes the reading a bit awkward too as it connects a slow-fast to fast-slow sequence which I think is better suited for sounds that crescendo/decrescendo rather than sudden stops. you might notice on how the song suddenly afloat with the stops. imo its better to slow -> fast rather than vice versa
02:00:390 - 02:00:554 - s m h. So on and so forth, not gonna mention the rest of these

01:58:041 - In my opinion, for SV sequences that span over LNs, I tend to favor having them be reversed and start slow value -> fast value as it drags the LN out at the very start, making it seem like it's never going to be released as opposed to jumping forward first before dragging in a really short time frame.pretty much my preference on how the song acts like "holding" its "beat". based on my experience also, people tend to control fast ->
slow more perfectly rather than slow -> fast because of the nature sense of "we dont know when the notes will speeding up"

02:12:711 - 02:13:041 - half half method on 3/4 LNs *sad life* Would honestly have benefitted from a simple bump like 02:12:711 - 2x and 02:12:793 - 0.5x, cap at 02:12:958 - with 1x.

03:02:903 (182903|0,182986|0) - t r i g g e r e d. Honestly, the minijack this creates is a really hard transition as the patterns immediately after this are all focused on the left hand in order to contrast the right hand heavy patterns used in the previous measure, so I'd just delete the first note in 1 and avoid the minijack altogether.

03:06:612 - For this, I think the ending burst is a bit unfair to players who have made it this far as the sound is a bit smoother than the rest of the sounds that are represented with bursts. Also, there's the fact that there's a 1/4 pause at the very end which can be a bit misleading when reading as a lot of people will simply assume it is a consistent roll going all the way to the last chord at 03:06:942 - . What I think should be used instead is a simple LN with a gradually increasing SV to show how the sound kind of lurches forward a bit. Wont list all the SVs here but poke me in discord if you need an idea of what kind of sv Im talking about.


[Another]
00:49:469 - Tfw edgy SV here but no edgy SV in Ultimate smh. Anyways, they aren't averaged though cause you need 16 units to properly utilize a 10x SV (could do 12 but that's not enough edge). Either way, these only use 8 units, so the max rankable value you could do is 7.3x to 0.1x. Or you can set BPM to 2912 and set snap to 1/16 and set 10x to 0.4x SVs that way if you really wanted, but the space between 1/16 snaps is only 2 ms so it's not worth it as it's too unnoticeable. deleted entirely. i forgot to remove this since i was too focused around ultimate lol

01:07:436 - Same thing as mentioned in ultimate

01:37:931 (97931|0,98096|3) - Might control H this or something cause none of the ministacks have ever been in col 1 so far and they have a bit of a bias towards the right hand in col 3 and 4.

03:00:183 (180183|0,180266|2,180348|1,180348|3,180431|2,180513|0) - Nice symmetry but at the same time I hate the movement restriction :ccc but its a gem (geddit DD)

03:01:255 (181255|0) - Think it would be better to either move this to col 2 or move 03:01:172 (181172|0) - to 2 to avoid the sudden minijack which may be justified due to the synth being the same pitch here, but it feels out of place as the section so far has been pretty rolly and smooth to play.


[Hyper]
00:30:019 - Not too sure how I feel about this as it is a Hyper diff and longer jumpstreams like this tend to be focused more on the difficulty just above this level. I might reduce the amount of jumps to be only every 2/1 instead of 1/1 as the player is still just mastering 1/4 bursts and singles I think. but then it'll lost its contrasts to Another. we have Advanced as an alternative. putting chord every 2/1 isnt musically fit either since its literally become layering inconsistency

01:28:865 (88865|0) - Rather than use an LN here, I think you're fine mapping the 3/2 long 1/4 burst here as you have already introduced denser 1/4 patterning to the player before, so it seems kind of anticlimactic to only extend an LN over the entire series of sound.

01:49:799 (109799|2,109881|1,109964|2,110046|0,110129|1,110211|2,110293|0,110376|2) - I think it'd be better to control H here to avoid having a 1/2 ministack on the same hand as the LN or something, cause I keep missing here and it's making me sad https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/9420533 i thinki keep this. it feels like doesnt seem to flow for me because of the one handed minitrill before the LN (look at the first 2 notes of your screenshot and the LN after it)

02:44:689 - I'd try to differentiate the roll direction or something a bit because it's identical to Another atm and does feel slightly repetitive the way it is now https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/9420547


[Advanced]
00:44:689 - I think you're missing a note for the piano here because every where else in this section has at least a single note for it :thinking:

01:00:348 (60348|0,60843|3,61337|1) - I'd change the arrangement of these LNs as they're the same as 00:57:711 - despite being different pitches.


[Standard]
02:00:019 (120019|3,120348|0,120348|3) - Shouldn't this still be [3]/[2][23] as you mapped all the snares in the same column, changing only at the end of the measure but this little miniphrase hasnt been completed yet but the chord changes from [23] to [14].


[Basic]
01:31:667 (91667|3,91997|0) - Think it would have been nice to stack these two notes to represent the staccato kick.
01:34:304 (94304|2,94634|0) - ^ just to add a little variation to the map.

02:23:425 (143425|3) - I'd consider moving this to col 2 and then turning 02:22:766 (142766|3) - into a 2/1 LN to represent the constantly increasing speed of the rhythm.

Protastic101 wrote:

mods are a social construct

[General]

1. Might wanna increase HP of As' Intermediate to 7.5 or something cause there's a bunch of little 1/4 rolls that the player won't really be punished for if they miss a lot in.// how about 8?
2. Spent about 20 minutes checking that every sample in the folder was used and it is T_T)b

[As' Intermediate]
00:55:953 (55953|2,56063|3,56282|1,56392|3,56612|1,56722|0) - I think it'd be nice to put these solely on one hand to better emphasize the kicks here, and leave the rest of the synths on the other hand, like this https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/9420599 // change to that, thankyou

03:06:942 (186942|1,188260|3) - Tbh, I think it's a bit odd to split the LNs here as they're basically part of the same sound with no distinct separation or cut between them to show that they're different sounds. Instead, the volume just grows a little bit faster at 03:08:260 - so I think overlapping the LNs similar to what the other diffs have done would be a more accurate representation of the crescendo.// fine i'll do that

Guilhermeziat wrote:

Hi, I came across the map and I really liked it but I found a couple inconsistencies on your last difficulty so I'll try to convey my points about them as well as possible while trying not to hurt your mapping structure.

Ultimate

00:45:348 - Maybe repattern this section to this instead ( http://puu.sh/yfue9/c131d47ca9.jpg )? I think it represents the pitch going up better without making it too dense, unless you really want to follow the triple layering. wasnt it already and yeah i still want to keep the triple, alas it'll become inconsistent with the rest of this section

00:49:799 - 00:55:733 - This could use more variety, it goes on for really long and it feels like you just copy pasted and mirrored the patterns a few times. Maybe you could layer a triple every third beat (like on 00:50:458 - and 00:51:447 - and so on) where there's a stronger kick (just like you were doing before) and then vary the pattern right after it (Example: http://puu.sh/yfuL7/d8cac22e3c.jpg though it doesn't need to be exactly like that, it's just to add a bit more variety). I don't think this will make it much harder either, so that'd be solved for you aswell. i'm actually in the brink of "yes" or "no"
on this. mainly the concern its about triple stacks. which seem to be quite harsh execution since there's SVs. secondly, it'll lose contrast between this diff and Another which contains pretty light hammerjack while this diff emphasized it more

00:55:733 (55733|3,55733|2) - 00:56:063 (56063|3,56063|2) - 00:56:392 (56392|3,56392|2) - These could also be triples, since the kick gets really hard on them, but it's up to you. I didn't highlight 00:56:722 (56722|2,56722|3) - for this matter because it's the start of a burst and it would make the transition a bit rough, however changing it from a [34] chord to a [14] chord I think would represent the crash better. Applying all the mods, it'd probably look something like this I guess ( http://puu.sh/yfuXG/71cbff24e0.jpg ), however applying the double change would require you to change up the patterning of the roll burst afterwards, so that's up to you. i guess i agree with the 2 and 3 but not the first one, however. since the first are not the part of the climax part

01:47:161 (107161|0,107161|1) - I also hear a crash in this double right here, so maybe consider changin it to a [14] aswell, but without inverting the hand that does the jumps again. I think it'd look pretty neat. it doesnt seem to be aesthetical-ish so i think i'll pass this one :c

01:49:140 - - to 01:50:458 - This goes way overboard compared to the rest of the map. Highly suggest you either start this as a 1/6 roll and then speed it up to 1/8 on the second part or just keep it at a 1/8 roll all along. Having a spike like this hurts the structure of the map in general due to the difference in difficulty, and it surely isn't very fun for players who are either trying to pass the song or FC it. Hah, just imagine, getting a really good acc FC up to that point and then getting absolutely trolled. kind of.... no. first off that we heard those burst are really really dense in which they definitely above the usual 1/8 setting. so using either 1/6 or 1/8 in a dense part are quite misleading. its also making it a little to no difference with "Another" in which in another way, pretty misleading since its displayed "Harder" than Another.


SV section: This looks awesome
01:53:178 (113178|2,113260|3,113343|1,113425|0,113508|2,113590|3,113672|1) - I'd check this patterning again if I were you, because I think 01:53:508 (113508|2,113672|1) - are ghost notes.
02:03:727 (123727|1,123810|0,123892|3,123975|2,124057|0,124140|1,124222|3) - ^ wha? i believe they're the part of the wub noises
01:55:568 (115568|3,115651|0) - Pretty sure this is a 1/6 burst (something like this http://puu.sh/yfw8v/20e00dfeb5.jpg ) woop
02:10:568 - Missing note? Not that this one matters too much because you put an SV here to another sound anyway. already represented by LN there so i guess its fine


02:22:766 (142766|2,142766|1) - and 02:23:425 (143425|2,143425|0,143425|3) - These chords... I don't really know what to say to fix the first one, but i'm guessing you don't really want to take it away if it's there in the first place, do you. As to the second one, I'd just reduce it to a double on [34] to prevent this minijack (02:23:425 (143425|2,143425|0,143425|3) - ) idk. its actually pretty fit for emphasis towards dense LN. well i think 1/4 minijack is kinda doable since ite present in the othe parts in the map as well

02:23:920 (143920|0,144002|1,144085|2,144167|3,144167|0,144249|1,144332|2,144414|0,144414|1,144414|3) - I don't know about you, but I don't hear the sound you're mapping LNs to on these notes 02:24:002 (144002|1,144167|3) - and i do hear it here 02:24:249 (144249|1) - . Might wanna get that part checked aswell (though the pattern is really cool and I'd leave it just for the aesthetics hue but this is the ranking criteria ). its a pitch (?) if i'm not mistaken. .. they simply represent the Gradual pitch raise :ddd

First main kiai: I'm not exactly sure if you're trying to map the synth or the hihats or both here, so take these mods with a grain of salt. Layering looks fine and the kiai is really fun to play too .
02:25:651 (145651|2) - Ghost note?
02:27:629 - Missing note?
02:28:453 - ^
02:28:782 (148782|1) - Ghost note?
02:30:925 (150925|0) - ^
02:33:892 - Missing note?
02:36:200 (156200|1) - Ghost note?
02:38:178 - Missing note?
02:39:332 (159332|0) - Ghost note?
02:41:475 (161475|2) - ^ I'll keep the "Ghost notes" as they are actually have noises tho :u some kind of synth and some are pitch changes else is yep

LN section between both kiais
02:44:689 (164689|2,164771|3,164854|0,164936|1,165019|2,165101|3,165183|1,165266|0,165348|2,165431|3) - I think this is supposed to be snapped to 1/3, unless you're not mapping the wubs. If you're mapping the synths here, then 02:44:689 (164689|2) - 02:44:936 (164936|1) - 02:45:183 (165183|1) - 02:45:266 (165266|0) - 02:45:431 (165431|3) - are the ones that should have LNs mapped to them, pretty sure the rest of them would be ghost notes. not really ghost notes if i must say, they are correctly represent the pitch raise every 1/4.

Second main kiai: I really liked how you spiced things up with the LNs here super cool
02:48:068 - Missing note?
02:58:618 - ^
03:06:118 (186118|1) - Ghost note? its still have noises, though not the one in particular follows but in order to not break aesthethics i decided to make it flows towards col 1 since the pitch are descended
03:06:530 - Missing note?

Good luck with your map! Hope I helped! I really liked it
I can also mod the other diffs if there's any need by the way

DDMythical wrote:

that burst ruins an otherwise good chart

The rest of this chart is fine so i'm just going to focus in on this burst and why it has massive playability issues in relation to the rest of this chart.

01:48:521 (108521|3,108563|2,108604|1,108645|3,108645|0) - rolls into splitjumptrills are extremely well used -- this is how you create a buildup without an nps increase.

01:49:661 (109661|1) - this isnt.

The way this is done is kind of silly; The pattern is meant to be jumptrilled I get this -- but you're cutting off a massive audience of players who want to play this for acc or w/e. This entire spike is a luckshot whether you hit it or not because its meant to be manipulated and its already a huge spike -- as seen on the NPS graph.

Suggesting that this burst instead starts with 01:49:140 (109140|0) - a 1/4th splitroll to emphasise the sound which is splitting up and lead in to a pattern at (01:49:634 (109634|0) -) which could be a 1/6th roll (consistently rolling in one direction) and then flipping the direction that it rolls at 01:50:129 (110129|3) - (removing the jump aswell) and emphasising the increase by switching the snapping to 1/8th.


Reasoning:

This pattern is much more playable and doesn't make the chart a luckshot.
This pattern is much more enjoyable for people who are just able to do the rest of it -- at the moment this is a spike so as if you can (almost) hit this you can smash the rest of the file and generally be bored; unless you're going for acc -- which isn't worth it because this section is a luckshot. It's a catch 22.

bleh

Slightly more objective wording

you created a great chart and ruined it with a single luckshot burst which pretty much ruins the entire chart as a knock on effect.
now this chart isn't playable for acc and isn't playable for people who would struggle with the HS/JS sections because this burst would just dropkick them

pp has nothing to do with any point of my argument don't bring it up

DDMythical wrote:

double posting

aight looked over your edit:

It doesn't fix the problem.

To be absolutely honest any use of 1/12th in this diff (unless its for grace or flams w/e) is too hard.

I think the only way to do this without it being luck based is to have the burst -- at its absolute ending peak -- be 1/8th.

01:49:140 (109140|3,109181|1,109222|3) - also there's a really dumb minitrill here

backed up points edition

1/12 streams in this are 546bpm 1/4ths. Since they are entirely jumptrillable we can take the benefit of halfing this to 273bpm jumptrill burst. Now the reason this stands out so much in comparison to the rest of the file -- as clearly indicated on the NPS graph -- is that the rest of the file is 182bpm trilly handstream. This is a massive skill gap.

I understand your reasoning of wanting this diff to be explicitly harder than another but the thing is -- not every single segment has to be harder and in this case you can actually express the difficulty increase in the other parts of the chart with harder handstream and different patterning (which you already have done) so actually, even if this burst is the same density as another the difficulty is still harder throughout the rest of it.


To fully show this i've created a slightly edited version where the burst is 1/6-1/8 just to show how the NPS graph changes and overall looks more fluid.



You can see that the spikes in intensity are still clearly represented but the chart no longer looks (or plays) like a luckshot file. Overall with these changes I think the file would be much more playable and enjoyable -- not only for high level players -- but for everyone looking to play at it as; as it stands this chart is really ruined by this burst (and from what I've gathered from other modders and players -- they think the same.)

EDIT:

MY BURST.OSU DOWNLOAD BLEH

https://pastebin.com/RpwAPmzY

juankristal wrote:

So I am going to pop this bubble for multiple reasons. Reason number one would be because I am going to be moved to probation due to my low activity and secondly because I feel the beginner is a bit too harsh for what the difficulty level indicates. A beginner should be playable for anyone who never touched the game before in his life and I feel this might touch a bit too complex things. Another reason in my opinion is that the bursts of the hardest difficulty are questionable at best so I will cover everything the best I can. o no

Beginner:

00:24:909 (24909|1) - This one I would rather have it deleted. I feel the same scenario happens in 00:26:887 - here but it gets ignored. The rhytms for such an easy difficulty as this one should be not complex at any point so going 1/2 triples then break then repeat only once cuts a bit the consistency factor in my opinion. The one with the jump because it works as a clearer transition and is also more significant in terms of music intensity.

00:45:183 (45183|0,45513|3) - I am not so sure about this LNs. I get the intention but I would rather have something like a double in 00:45:843 - here to get emphasys for the piano-ish sound. If thats what you are looking for I think it makes more sense to follow the ending with a bit more intensity rather than having two LNs following just part of the rhytm that the piano emulates if that makes sense.

00:49:140 (49140|1,49140|0) - Would personally make this a 1/2 1-2-34 stair instead. Without the LN pointed there of course. I makes up for a better transition to end of section feeling imo. aint that would be contrary to your concern before about beginner being "too hard"?

01:18:810 - I would say this is a bit too hard for a beginner difficulty to be honest. The rhytms are way too broken (even though it follows the song perfectly) so it plays a bit hard for any player up to this level of difficulty. I would honestly just follow the piano ticks with single notes but this is kinda subjective so feel free to analyze it yourself.

No matter what you pick this is a no no no no no 01:27:711 (87711|0,87876|2,88041|1,88041|3) - . Make it 1-2-34 or even a 1-4-12 in worst case scenario to keep some sort of trill motion but not lowering the density.

01:52:766 (112766|1) - Move to 4, having release + press on the same hand is too hard. Probably the same goes here but move to 2 01:50:458 (110458|2) -

02:02:986 (122986|1,123151|2,123315|0) - rip noob players

02:06:942 - I would do something like https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/9659105 its a bit too challenging otherwise. idk since the rythm is odd enough, using LN isnt really the best way imo. since they need to deal with odd releases

02:23:013 - Try this, I think your way to do it is a bit too hard as well. https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/9659131 not really change on this since i want to keep the LN place on it. current place are the loudest buildup that could be heard.

Standard

In general I am not a fan of this difficulty. I feel its done with no cares in general and I dont really feel anything while playing it. I would suggest a few things to improve the situation:

For the intro up until the mark of 30 seconds I made a custom section to replace what you currently have. I feel the way you made it isnt necesarily bad or anything I just think that its not reaching the potential the diff could reach. I will drop the .osu file of what I did to see if you can find out some ideas out of it and perhaps change your map in that direction a bit https://puu.sh/ywLMm/ca30a2b07d.txt. i feel like your version is kinda not contrasted with both beginner and aste's. i want it to be like an introduce to higher snapping usage but still living every 2 measure with breaks

00:32:986 (32986|3,33151|3,33151|1) - Here I would make it 2 doubles without a jack. I think it works because it emulates the intensity I think you want to achieve but the minijack there is way too rude for this diff, specially considering the jump from beginner.

01:54:744 (114744|3) - why not double smh 01:57:381 (117381|0) - (this one 34)
02:00:019 - aaaa same and there are some more but zzz they are kind of intended. making the doubles all the ways is somewhat too hard for the progression.


02:25:074 - For this section I HIGHLY recommend you to follow the main music because man, it would be a waste if you dont. I again drafted something for you to use in this section in case you find it cool. If you want to use it, follow it up until 02:30:348 - where you have to repeat-ish it. (i sent it to you on discord because puush is a d) so kinda did but in my own way + approximate them as closely as possible because 1/4 thing isnt really feasible for progression imo. plus the placement of each isnt in usual beat where it could be predictable. Aste already did it and i think its best to keep the concept on him.

For the rest is mostly fine, I think we can give another go once we are done with the rest.

For the rest of the set I will follow up later most likely, my eyes are about to explode. So I will take a short look on what I think are big issues in the hardest difficulty now:

Ultimate

I am not an expert on SVs but I am 100% sure 00:40:898 - this SVs dont play well at all. They feel waay too sudden and the fact that they are LNs makes them ultra akward to hit properly. I imagine it might have to deal with the fact that the 0,9 SV is right in the moment where the note ticks and I would probably move it down a bit they are intended so there would be a bump feel without tricking the LN visually. i dont think the LN is awkward imo. a couple testplay i asked before are same, they dont feel really troubled on this part

I feel the SV section changes are a bit off, I understand the reasoning to change the pattern else it would be just ultra mindblock material and kinda boring and not really diverse but I think the changes in pattern arent really that justified at least in the mappers perspective. Perhaps players wont feel it as much due to the patterns being too bland but I would make the changes in pattern for sections like this 00:50:458 (50458|1,50458|0,50568|3,50568|2,50678|2,50678|3,50788|0,50788|1) - instead. You can hear that there is some sort of repeated jackstyle-ish sound there that supports the pattern change without making it look weird. Basically just did what you exactly did but making the transitions 2/1 beats earlier and probably one more time. hope i get this lol

For the bursts... 394 bpm streams with doubles is way too much haha. Even harder considering the transition before it. Please remove the doubles in the 1//8s bursts at least, the rest can be discussed. muh pp :'

02:24:746 - Why this part has no LNs but the ending does? I mean sure, you want the end of the end to be the most intensive but really, this part is just way too easy compared to anything else and its reaaally asking for some LN action. We can sort it out one day on IRC for sure. one thing for sure that the 1st chorus are entirely act as an introduce to the more trickier part. and i dont really wont to change its since it'll lost the contrast with Another i might kinda screwed the LN part a bit so i guess if you have a thing that come in mind to make it more cool, is welcome c:

The mod of the last difficulty isnt really a mod I would say, instead, is just marking what I think are the biggest points of issues but the real mod would take place another day. Call me back once you answered this if I dont come back earlier than that.

juankristal wrote:

So I am going to pop this bubble for multiple reasons. Reason number one would be because I am going to be moved to probation due to my low activity and secondly because I feel the beginner is a bit too harsh for what the difficulty level indicates. A beginner should be playable for anyone who never touched the game before in his life and I feel this might touch a bit too complex things. Another reason in my opinion is that the bursts of the hardest difficulty are questionable at best so I will cover everything the best I can.

A's

00:26:310 (26310|2,26392|3,26557|0,26640|1,26722|0) - Make those (and all of them kind) something different. Its a bit too hard to one hand trill like that at this level. I would suggest keep the trill motion but in a different way. For example, you can do 1-4-1 or 4-1-4 or even 1-3-2, etc.

02:08:178 (128178|2) - Would move to 2, similar reasons, makes it easier.

02:22:766 (142766|2,142931|0,143013|2,143178|0,143260|2,143425|0) - This is just WAAY too confusing for players in this range. Something like this could work http://osu.ppy.sh/ss/9659399 // my apologize but your suggestion make it a bit confusing to read, i just found out that the placement of 1 notes before the pointed one are missplaced and makes it looks like it's 1 chain with the pointed one (should be on 4 instead, i forgot to move that), but thanks for pointing that out

You would be missing 1/4 notes in 02:28:370 - and 02:28:535 -. If you want to avoid this being a bit too technical you could just make an LN out of the last note here 02:28:205 (148205|1) - and extend it until the moment you want to start the 1/4 stream. Avoid using 1/4 breaks in 1/4 streams for this difficulty level. // in this section, i tried to follow the synth so there should be a breaks like that, but after some checking again, yeah the snaps are a bit confusing and i change some of the snaps so it less confusing, i guess

In general, most of the ending just works like that and its a bit confusing for the level you are aiming for. I dont think you should remap everything there but certainly keep an eye in the broken 1/4s like the ones I mentioned. They are probably not so many of them that could be fixed in the same way I presented or probably even more ways.

juankristal wrote:

okey this took way longer than expected

Advanced

00:18:810 (18810|2,18975|0,19140|1) - Those should be trills, 3-1-3 works
00:26:722 (26722|1,26887|3,27052|2) - ^ 2-4-2 and 00:27:216 (27216|1) - on 3

00:30:019 - ay spikes. I would make all these 1/4s up until 00:30:925 - rolls from 4 to 1 since the sound is basically repeating itself so using pattern repetition sounds about right.

00:31:997 - Did something like this https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/9858355. Probably isnt the most optimal solution but the diff as it is strains too much the right hand in this part so I tried to balance it out a bit.

02:09:497 (129497|0) - Sure this shouldnt be attached to the red tick instead? Like 1/2

02:34:964 - https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/9858387 Would delete that double since the density picks up a bit compared to the rest of the map. Also using trill motion for the drum there sounds fine. 02:56:063 - same if you apply i think that would be inconsistent with the rest of the same snare which i map it as double

Another

00:24:579 (24579|1) - I am not a fan of this shield release tbh. Neither here nor the harder diff. I feel they are actually 2 different sounds instead of just a long one. You could sort it around to make it more confortable though, similar to what you did in ultimate.

00:49:799 - Should probably apply what I mentioned in the hardest diff in my previous mod.

00:57:601 (57601|3,57711|3) - noo0o0oa0oae0tiay6097yi09a6u4ai6k. Check the hardest diff and move around some stuff to sort that minijack out xD. Or just move the LN, something.

Technically the 1/4 stream should start here 01:28:535 - for this and the hardest diff. Its a personal choice not to do so? If so thats fine but just want to double check. hmm not so obvious for me so yea i guess i'll leave it like that xd

01:48:480 - I did something like this here https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/9858512 to make it easier to follow. I personally find it easier and not too different but its up to you for this one I guess since it seems like a "drastical" change. i guess not for this. its quite my preference and doesnt seem to play bad xd

01:49:799 - Instead of bumping up the ultimate diff with jumps in the middle of 360 bpm streams I would do something like this in this diff to make up for the difficulty gap instead of making ultimate harder just keep this burst a bit easier https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/9858476 i personally didnt like a thing where everything-should-be-hard-but-its-done-in-easy-way stuff. might be true for lower diff but i guess not this one. it'll lost contrast with hyper since it has streams too

Ultimate

01:39:497 - That one is intentional? Dont feel its strong enough to follow that guess i'll make this anchorable :d

remove jumps of the burst pls. Also you could (and perhaps ask some people around what they think too) do something similar to what I suggested in the previous diff. well... they are claps.people i asked for testplays are also fine with it. changed the pattern to be a little bit more readable after the js anyway

02:23:343 (143343|0,143425|0) - Not a fan of, would likely delete 02:23:425 (143425|2) - this one and avoid the minijack completely.

Most of the stuff marked in the previous diff could be applied here to some extent

Protastic101 wrote:

rederpled by request

i sound stupid

Ranking Criteria wrote:

Hitsounds must be in .wav. Hitsounds in .wav format are preferred, as .mp3 files will not loop correctly and have a short delay, between 0ms and 20ms, but .mp3 is allowed only for a special purpose for the beatmap, like the usage of reverse cymbal that have delay on the start. Note that using ogg is unrankable.

Rivals_7 wrote:

I could actually place the HS on 686 but that requires the internal editing on .osu files, which is itself an unrankable thing.
>Do not manually edit anything in an .osu file that cannot be changed through the Editor.

Asherz007 wrote:

Right, time to address this hitsound thing.

[Hitsounds]

Ranking Criteria wrote:

Hitsounds must be in .wav. Hitsounds in .wav format are preferred, as .mp3 files will not loop correctly and have a short delay, between 0ms and 20ms, but .mp3 is allowed only for a special purpose for the beatmap, like the usage of reverse cymbal that have delay on the start. Note that using ogg is unrankable.

So yeah, in this point (albeit a tiny bit obscure), pretty much the only circumstance where hitsounds can have delays on them is through them being reversed hitsounds, which can also be .mp3s, oddly enough. right, i forgot to mention this earlier. i'm tardy on reading

In any case, having the silence on the front of these specific hitsounds adds very little in terms of size to the file; removing this does cause difficulties elsewhere in terms of properly places these hitsounds so that the peaks fall in the right place:

Rivals_7 wrote:

I could actually place the HS on 686 but that requires the internal editing on .osu files, which is itself an unrankable thing.
>Do not manually edit anything in an .osu file that cannot be changed through the Editor.

By the way, although it looks backwards, there are ways you can move things into the storyboard with the end result being those hitsounds appearing unsnapped (like temporary red lines), so in all technicalities unsnapped sb objects wouldn't be unrankable (as they're not meant to be anything that affects gameplay), just weird. i dont want this to be cluttered by tons of line so :d

[Keysounds]
Okay, my turn to complain, I guess lol. Spotted a keysound inaccuracy and wondering whether this was meant to be intentional or something since it does create a clash, albeit not heard that much because of how short the note I spotted was. (Also prot is hopeless with verifying keysound accuracy, and juan is juan)

Time for some music theory to support this I guess (man how many times I've had to use some of that this week). Using the top difficulty for reference since that's where everything is more easily accessible. Some of it is for keysounds in general, some specifcally for that difficulty.

I dunno whether this starting bit you're trying to emulate the audio 1:1 or have the keysounds be additional to the audio, but since it seems to be kinda both at the same time, I'll address my issues nonetheless:

1. 00:06:613 (6613|2) - Would personally drop this down an octave to B5, because musically jumping around between several octaves generally doesn't make a lot of sense to a musician, but either is justifiable here.
2. 00:07:602 (7602|3,7602|0) - D6 (audio has this)
3. 00:08:261 (8261|2,8261|3) - G5/B5 (G6 is too high compared to what the audio has)
4. 00:08:591 (8591|0) - B4 (audio has this)
5. 00:10:239 (10239|1) - more or less in an identical phrase to at 00:02:327 (2327|0), so I would have thought this would have been a G5 as well?
6. 00:15:514 (15514|2,16503|1) - Perhaps a little odd there's no E6 and D#6 respectively here, given that you do try and follow the upper register with 00:16:393 (16393|3,16448|2).

i checked this all. if i remember these correctly i remember that i slightly change these octaves and stuff in order for it to not being too blended. is not too far off in a common sense i believe, nor that affect the gameplay wise, since not everyone is a musician.

I'd say some stuff about the storyboarded hi-hats, but they make sense in the context of the song so that's fine I guess.

00:45:623 (45623|2) - Okay. So what we have here in the music is a chord transition from E minor to D major and then to C# minor. In any of these three chords, F is essentially dissonant since it doesn't fit within the musical scales associated with each chord. Also, the audio reflects this accurately, hence this should really be an F#6. to be honest....really, i dont heard any much different. i'm not really sure why 1164530434 using an F6 but still technically right in a sense imo. same octave, same chord.

00:45:678 (45678|3,45843|0,45843|3) - I feel like hitsound prioritisation got a little weird here since it's the keysounds that are in the main field here and the percussion hitsounds are in the storyboard. For the majority of the map, this is generally the other way around, so I'm wondering whether this was intentional. That said, the hi-hat is in play at 00:45:678 (45678|3) probably because of the hitsound copier that usually copy the highest HS volume to the note, and the rest are copied to SB, but sometimes derped. idk how

00:48:315 (48315|3) - A6 (audio has that)
00:49:140 (49140|3) - also A6 A6 feels barely audible to me. Plus all that percussion overshadowed over them making A6 even harder to heard

00:57:711 - A bit odd that some of the keysounds are storyboarded here even though that's what you're focusing on. same comment about copier xd

Not DQing here for this since it's subjective in a sense; I want to see what you think about all of this.

While I'm here, I'm going to inquire about why Aste's diff is hp8.5. Because he want to? p/6339506 i assume its because of its unusual way of he mapped it (mostly melody focused)

Time to bash prot then pls dont. pat her instead because good will would come if you pat the holy sheep of ET-ness

TheToaphster wrote:

Alright here we go
Why do I feel the need to do this so bad
God I don't like this

Extremely long mod I'm serious tread carefully

Ok so. First thing, I feel this map, in general, is extraordinarily boring. You mapped things in the safest, most boring possible way in many sections, outright ignore melody in favor of percussion that sometimes can't even be heard in comparison, its inconsistent within itself, tries too hard to be interesting (I'll probably rant about the SV usage in this when I go over this thing), and dumbs itself down in favor of playing easier. i'll be leaving that subjective impression to all who plays, and to all who favouriting. since every opinion varied, i wont say anything

Let's look at some examples of some of these things I just listed

Let's start with consistency

00:01:997 - you ignored this sound and 00:09:909 - while paying attention to the sound at 00:04:964 - and 00:08:591 - (inconsistent within itself, this is extremely minor though) what sound? if there's anything i can hear of is only an echo of the first piano sound. that is almost barely noticeable. The fact that even none of the modder here even mentioned that, this is already explaining that those two point are worthless to be mapped. do note i'm only focusing to the prominent, hearable piano
00:11:228 - Not a double while literally two notes later theres a double on the same sound. - 00:05:294 (5294|3) - look here. same with this
I probably won't mention any more stuff in this slow intro thing. It needs work

00:19:057 (19057|1) - Why is this mapped? To make it flow better? Cuz theres no sound there hihat (not the hitsound. its actually exist)

00:19:469 (19469|1,19469|0,19469|3) - no discernable difference between this and 00:19:799 (19799|2,19799|0,19799|3) - despite being noticeably different sounds how can you tell its "noticeably" different?

00:23:013 (23013|0) - Same as before ^. kinda funny actually, you only mentioned the specific part despite almost all the similar synths have relatively same volume

00:23:425 (23425|1,23425|0,23425|3) - see above in relation to 00:23:755 (23755|2,23755|1,23755|3) - ^

00:25:486 - So you decided to not map this note despite doing it before? if you meant this - 00:21:530 (21530|1) - , its intentional because i did the structure quite different, and so the player could handle these properly.

Not mentioning any more consistency issues for that section. Please look over this. Also those LNs feel awkward to me being used in that way. This method of using long notes will eventually lead me to another point I'll be bringing up later which mostly has to do with you arbitrarily switching between mapping using lns and mapping without using lns.

00:31:420 (31420|2,31502|1,31585|3) - I don't see a point in deviating from the already established trill thing you were doing, which legitimately made sense and was somewhat interesting there's 3 triple (or "hands" if you more comfortable with that term) in-between these transition. okay maybe i still could do the trill but it will be unecessarily heavy with 3 stacks happend in two columns at the same time

00:32:986 (32986|2,32986|1,32986|3,33151|3,33151|2,33151|0) - Why did you make these two different hands. Why not make them both [234] hands. They are literally the same exact sound and have no reason being different. 2nd hands act as an opening to the next section. particularly that works too but i feel the concept is better be like this

00:40:898 (40898|2,40898|1,40898|3,41227|1,41227|3,41227|2) - Not really an inconsistency mod but why are these not extended to be full 1/2 lns. There is no sound here that doesn't end on the 1/2 note tick cymbals sounds slightly longer here. you can notice it more clearly at 25% but generally you should be easily heard it when playing

00:45:760 (45760|1) - This is a ghost note 100% sure this is a piano

Ok I'm, going to take a break from this inconsistency stuff for a second.



Are you actually serious?????

What even is this?

1) There is no discernable difference between the heavier percussion sounds and the main melody (which seems to be something you entirely focused on for everything before this section)

2) This is actually the most boring and simple choice you could have made for this section, and may actually be the most boring part of the map

3) It initially implies that 3-note jump jacks will be the focus of the section and then deviates from that.

4) 3-note jacks are actually what make the most sense here

5) This section is way dumbed down presumably because jAcKs ArE HaRd

6) The SVs are actually worthless and seems like they were used solely because you realized this section was boring and wanted to "spice it up"

This literally follows all but one of my general complaints about the map.
........and then what? looks like you didnt have anything against these in general since you dont even provide solution (and probably i wont even accept because i can imagine how cluttered it will be if i do adding another note to make it hands for the claps)

Back to general mods/inconsistency stuff

00:57:711 (57711|3,58205|0,58700|2) - hold on you can't be serious. This is literally not an audible sound. So you made it so the hitsounds were the only thing that these notes were mapped to. That is ridiculous. Its almost like you wanted to attempt a hitsound job like imperishable night but only for 3 notes. Why??? are you really serious lol. i cant even say anything, (and hey, 2 QAT already coming here and not even both of them mentioned this is being inaudible or anything of sort.) this is 100% hearable i assure you. and thats about it. Go over youtube then head over the video of this song in Lanota, the official chart also map this part. and so does this one.

01:08:260 (68260|3,68260|2,68260|0,68754|0,68754|1,69249|1,69249|2) - Both notes being held at a given time change pitch for each one and have eqaully emphatic percussion hits attached, so there isn't much of a reason to connect the LNs like this as opposed to making them all separate LN hand things there isnt much but one: 2 LNs are to cover a relatively loud-long-noises happen here. tbf only using one LN kinda lost its feel to me

01:15:513 - I don't know why but I highly dislike this choice here. It ust feels a bit weird idk

01:16:172 (76172|3,76172|0,76667|2,76667|1,77161|2,77161|0) - Noticeable weaker synth and percussion, mapped exactly the same only pitch are changing. nothing sounds weaker or stronger. they are equal

01:33:809 (93809|1) - This ln should start at 01:33:645 - its noticeably louder there (and probably a bit arbitrary if i do that since everything here is 1/2)

01:29:359 -
Ok I'm gonna go back to right here, where this section starts.
I don't know if mapping every 1/2 note is necessary. There are much more noticeable sounds that you seem to ignore (since you seem to be going for the melody + claps + kicks), namely the bass hit or whatever you want to call it. Plus there really isn't much of a discernable sound on every 1/2 beat that justifies this kind of mapping.
01:39:908 - HERE However, there is an extremely noticeable and loud percussion sound happening every 1/4 beat. This section should be noticeably different in terms of density/structure/patterning so that a transition through the obviously increasing intensity of the song can be seen and felt by players I strongly disagree with "loud percussion happening every 1/4 beat". apparently the 1/4 is only happening every time 1/2 beat is done, but thats just synth. the percussion will be probably at - 01:43:123 - and - 01:44:441 - here only. but i dont really want since it'lll break the overall concept i want to build here. like, the concept is goes on 1/2 from - 01:39:908 -, then goes 1/4 with the jtrill, then 1/8 with the Jstream


01:49:139 - So I don't really like this but i guess its not necessarily bad. It doesn't go against any ideas or anything, so w/e. Theres something tipping me off a bit though, w/e

01:53:095 - Alright here comes more boring stuff.
Why
Like
Honestly
Why
This, in no way, has any understandable reasoning for being extremely basic jumpstream/handstream. Especially since the rest of the chart is literally the same way. I can understand that doing other stuff with rice patterns would likely cause a ruckus with "ghost note" arguments or whatever but like, c'mon. It doesn't increase the difficulty of anything outside of some basically neglidgeable SVs that are literally only mapped to the large percussion kicks and the transition sounds. It takes arguably the most intense part of the song (which also highly deviates from the rest of the song) and makes it change nothing about what has already been presented to us.

Might I also add that, because of the nature of the types of SVs you are trying to use here, the section flows incredibly poorly, with the drum kicks serving only as interruptions to a part where they are really cohesive with the general tone of the section of music.
The way I personally would fix it is to make it so that instead of trying too hard to normalize the separation of the notes to a 1x scroll speed, just weaken the jump and then keep it going (what i mean is that you'd start with a weakened SV for the jump, say 1.25x or something or whatever works, and immediately follow it with a 1x so that it doesnt "stop" the scrolling and merely causes the notes to jump forward as a result of an extremely intense sound, which ultimately allows for the song to flow much better and even poses a challenge to players)

and what do you even want me to do? make it harder, while the song doesnt really provide me with instrument anymore than this? yeah probably its just the usual handstream/jumpstream (and trill) like before, but then thats why the SV come into play to make it intense. with those SVs you are forced to play more accurately due to the nature of SVs. Players could probably feel the intensity because of SVs although with relatively simple patterning stuff (and the "stop" is okay imo. it doesnt faking the length, so most players will naturally hit the continuous 1/4 with ease)

I won't mention any more about the whole boring aspect of this section or same-y nature of it, but will focus now on other stuff thats really weird.

02:02:326 - So some of these LNs don't really fit with the sound of the synth. Specifically, 02:02:491 (122491|3,122573|1,122738|3,122820|1,122985|2) - These 5 seem to be mapped to literally nothing heard at 100%, the buzz synth(?) pitch change for a moment and those LNs is to cover that

02:08:919 (128919|3) - Shouldn't this LN be twice as long i think that will be too cluttered since i'm also mapping kick 1/2 after

02:11:557 - See, to me here, the synth really only deserves 1 LN representing it, whereas you could probably make the second one extended to help represent the background woosh thing. 02:12:051 - Like here, you have the woosh also mapped I would presume, though two of the LNs should be extended to represent this more clearly. probably, but i dont see anything thats "too wrong" in my current pattern

02:13:864 (133864|0,133947|0,134029|2,134112|2) - Why are these minijacks? They don't deviate at all from the 4 notes right before it from my perspective Jtrill doesnt seem to fit with the song situation. each jacks also mimicking the pitch and why am i making it jacks is to mimick the percussion. trill could works too but i think jacks is more fitting

02:15:183 - Shouldn't be a double

02:16:172 - Shouldn't be a double

02:19:963 (139963|1,139963|0,140128|0,140128|1) - Shouldn't be doubles?

02:20:458 (140458|3,140458|2,140623|2,140623|3) - Same?
Same for the patterns right after it too why? they are all obvious, loud drums

02:23:919 (143919|0,144002|1,144084|2,144167|0,144167|3,144249|1,144331|2,144414|3) - What was the logic behind this pattern? There is nothing supporting it, in fact, the synth only sounds on every 1/2 beat, not every 1/4th beat, so some of the LNs before it are also representing essentially nothing gradual pitch change. there's a slightly pitch change every 1/4 there.

02:24:743 - sag hjsrklgb hjkedr;gke God I'm overreacting to this but it feels so weird to just completely ignore the extremely loud synth in favor of only mapping the percussion. Like honestly. I understand that there technically isn't anything wrong for the kiai but its another case of it feeling so same-y compared to the beginning of the chart despite making noticeably intensity and melody changes.

02:28:452 (148452|1) - Oh is this you trying to map the synth too??? This might just be you accidentally putting a ghost note in but if you want to seem like you are mapping the synth layer it with the percussion that you wanted it to map too at the lease instead of only placing notes that correspond to the synth when literally nothing else is there. if anyhting, thats not synths. its melody. all the synths is already mapped and could be recognized in where i put that loud hihat noises in HS

02:25:650 (145650|2) - Speaking of ghost notes I'm heading back a few seconds because this is definitely one regardless of whether you were trying to map the synth or not. This goes for every time there is one of those jump to hand things ^

02:44:689 - Ok if anything I'm almost certain these should be 1/3 LNs the wubs? .....thats not straight 1/3, nor that the wubs has a distinct start place to be heard. so i'm goes with simplifying to 1/4 secondary synths for the sake of gameplay

02:45:842 - Wait what. WHY. Stop trying to make your maps more varied for the sake of having variation. It's LITERALLY THE SAME SOUND. There is no justifiable reason for why you would randomly change the entire structure of the kiai halfway through, other than the fact that the drums (and possibly also the synth) most notably get louder in the second half. Why would you put more emphasis on a completely new sound in the map despite the emphasis relative to the other sound (ie the drums emphasis in comparison to the synth) stays the same? If anything the map should just get denser in general while following the same concept you had developed just prior to it. This is the most effective way to handle something like this, as opposed to changing the entire concept. Not to mention that this second half of the kiai doesn't even stay consistent with mapping the synth sounds to LNs so I don't even know what to say (eg 02:48:974 (168974|3,169057|0,169139|3,169221|0,169304|3,169304|1) - none of these notes having any LN relevancy)
so apparently you saying that i should make the 2nd kiai the same as 1st but denser? you literally just complaining about being "boring" yet suggesting more boring stuff.
No one stop you to try a new concept for every. section. alone.

03:01:667 - Not sure why there are 1/4 notes placed between all the jumps tbh, since there isn't a noticeable sound there synths

03:04:963 - Not a hand????? too cramped. with all the 1/4 happening

03:06:117 (186117|2) - This note definitely shouldn't exist pointless awkward break. there's also synths. and its LNs to keep consistency

03:05:787 - Also not sure why you made these all LN shields. Kind of deviates from anything else you do in the map, so it just feels random

God ok I'm done with Ultimate.

I feel like I've said enough for one diff that it should be obvious some amount of discussion should be put forward. I hear so much about how the ranked section is complete garbage, and the fact that maps like this have the capability of making it through while having so many noticeable problems on a single difficulty just blows my mind. I didn't even explain that much about why I don't like 90% of the SVs put in this map. I said some basic general stuff in a couple of mods but I did not even finish what I wanted to say about them. My main point for that likely being related to my hatred of SVs for the sake of SVs, but w/e.

I heard it too, but with our current condition right now, not so much we can do. Not everyone is capable to replicate edgy-styled-maps, heavy SVs or anything like that (nor the song is not oftenly have something to support that). things that got popular, is the things that will get the attention the most and eventually become the example of the future maps. its just how community works. Be the change you want by ranking more of your maps so it can be an example later. maybe i'm not the one but hopefully, eventually it will be.

Not every maps could satisfy the whole community. there's always the one who simply dont like it.

your points seems to be heavily biased, and sometime you trying to alternate the concept that mappers did (already a violation to CoC itself). I guess my POV and yours is different towards the song, which is okay but if you start to force your POV to the mapper, thats where you wrong. your words of choice clearly saying that.

Also, I am really sorry Rivals, if this comes off as aggressive or targeting of you or something, I'm not trying to pinpoint you specifically, its just that I am planning to start doing this to any qualified map that I feel it to be necessary on (which will likely be a lot), and you ended up being the unlucky recipient of my first tear-down.

Also side-note. If anyone reads this and starts pointing at me as some evil modder who hates everything, please know that it is not important to me that you like me as a modder or w/e. I will keep an open mind to things but I will not hesitate to pull you down to fix notable flaws.

Please can we start getting discussions going with how to improve the ranked section, because I would really rather not hear 800 complaints a day about the fact that the system used to hyperadvertise the highest quality beatmaps is full of extremely sub-par or even awful maps.

Thank you

Rivals_7 wrote:

TheToaphster wrote:

00:01:997 - you ignored this sound and 00:09:909 - while paying attention to the sound at 00:04:964 - and 00:08:591 - (inconsistent within itself, this is extremely minor though) what sound? if there's anything i can hear of is only an echo of the first piano sound. that is almost barely noticeable. The fact that even none of the modder here even mentioned that, this is already explaining that those two point are worthless to be mapped. do note i'm only focusing to the prominent, hearable piano
First off, saying that no modders before me caught this, therefore I shouldn't have to change this, is invalid, given that the whole point of having multiple modders is so that people can catch things that other people didn't. Second off, there are sounds that are clearly audible that, yes, do correlate to what youre calling an "echo" of the first piano note. However, it is important to note that you actually do map notes to sounds that have the exact same volume and intensity, say comparing the sound at 00:01:997 - and the sound at 00:04:964 - . They are the same volume, same intensity, same purpose, but one has a note and one doesn't. This is clearly an inconsistency issue. Whether or not it can be written off as just a small mistake is out of my jurisdiction but is still something I should bring up regardless.


00:11:228 - Not a double while literally two notes later theres a double on the same sound. - 00:05:294 (5294|3) - look here. same with this
Ok? Then that is also a problem? This has no defense for why you do this, only exposing yourself for having this sort of inconsistency.

00:19:057 (19057|1) - Why is this mapped? To make it flow better? Cuz theres no sound there hihat (not the hitsound. its actually exist)
No it doesn't. And if you actually think it doesn I would implore you to listen to it slowed down and compare what you hear to the stuff you mapped right before it.

00:19:469 (19469|1,19469|0,19469|3) - no discernable difference between this and 00:19:799 (19799|2,19799|0,19799|3) - despite being noticeably different sounds how can you tell its "noticeably" different?
I really shouldn't have to explain why this is noticeably different. The second sound you mapped a hand to is louder than the one before, thus deserving of different layering effects, which you didn't do

00:23:013 (23013|0) - Same as before ^. kinda funny actually, you only mentioned the specific part despite almost all the similar synths have relatively same volume
When did we start talking about synth? Also when did we start talking about volume with this stuff? This mod was reffering to the 19:057 mod when it said same, which had nothing to do with synth and everything to do with percussion, an ignorance that I will give the same rebuttal to.

00:23:425 (23425|1,23425|0,23425|3) - see above in relation to 00:23:755 (23755|2,23755|1,23755|3) - ^^

00:25:486 - So you decided to not map this note despite doing it before? if you meant this - 00:21:530 (21530|1) - , its intentional because i did the structure quite different, and so the player could handle these properly. What makes you think the player would have any trouble with the second set if they were able to handle the first set just fine? And also stating that you "changed" the structure of this section despite it not changing in the music enough to justify only supports the lack of quality and consistency

Not mentioning any more consistency issues for that section. Please look over this. Also those LNs feel awkward to me being used in that way. This method of using long notes will eventually lead me to another point I'll be bringing up later which mostly has to do with you arbitrarily switching between mapping using lns and mapping without using lns. Going to still fully support my suggestion here

00:31:420 (31420|2,31502|1,31585|3) - I don't see a point in deviating from the already established trill thing you were doing, which legitimately made sense and was somewhat interesting there's 3 triple (or "hands" if you more comfortable with that term) in-between these transition. okay maybe i still could do the trill but it will be unecessarily heavy with 3 stacks happend in two columns at the same time So I understand what you mean here, Idk I guess it just doesn't really feel right? I'll say that this is something that could stay given the circumstances, though I don't necessarily like the lack of clarity between the three hands given that all three of them are different from each other in terms of sound, though that much might be difficult to avoid here

00:32:986 (32986|2,32986|1,32986|3,33151|3,33151|2,33151|0) - Why did you make these two different hands. Why not make them both [234] hands. They are literally the same exact sound and have no reason being different. 2nd hands act as an opening to the next section. particularly that works too but i feel the concept is better be like this
Eh, I personally disagree with purposely avoiding a more representative pattern in order to lead players into a section despite the transition being relatively easy with respect to the rest of the chart

00:40:898 (40898|2,40898|1,40898|3,41227|1,41227|3,41227|2) - Not really an inconsistency mod but why are these not extended to be full 1/2 lns. There is no sound here that doesn't end on the 1/2 note tick cymbals sounds slightly longer here. you can notice it more clearly at 25% but generally you should be easily heard it when playing
You misunderstood this I think, what I meant is that the sound is longer than what you have mapped. Though this is pretty minor so w/e

00:45:760 (45760|1) - This is a ghost note 100% sure this is a piano Ok no. The last piano sound for this is on 00:45:678 - , and you can definitely tell by listening to the gap between the last piano and the drum hit that begins the next measure

Ok I'm, going to take a break from this inconsistency stuff for a second.



Are you actually serious?????

What even is this?

1) There is no discernable difference between the heavier percussion sounds and the main melody (which seems to be something you entirely focused on for everything before this section)

2) This is actually the most boring and simple choice you could have made for this section, and may actually be the most boring part of the map

3) It initially implies that 3-note jump jacks will be the focus of the section and then deviates from that.

4) 3-note jacks are actually what make the most sense here

5) This section is way dumbed down presumably because jAcKs ArE HaRd

6) The SVs are actually worthless and seems like they were used solely because you realized this section was boring and wanted to "spice it up"

This literally follows all but one of my general complaints about the map.
........and then what? looks like you didnt have anything against these in general since you dont even provide solution (and probably i wont even accept because i can imagine how cluttered it will be if i do adding another note to make it hands for the claps)
This part is extraordinarily important that you fix. It is not good. It is also not my job to give you suggestions for how to fix it. However, I will give you a suggestion on top of Gekido-'s that has already been shared since you seem to be incapable of it on your own.

suggestion

How about something like this? Ditching the jumps will allow you to make this section more representative of the section of music, incorporate the 3-note jacks like I said would likely fit the best here, and would also let you differentiate between the quiter and louder drum kicks. Not to mention that Gekido-'s also allowed for this while keeping essentially the same note density as yours. Also to note that in mine you *might* (a LOT of emphasis on this might) even be able to put an extra note before each jump and hand to even make my suggestion keep the same density as yours.

Back to general mods/inconsistency stuff

00:57:711 (57711|3,58205|0,58700|2) - hold on you can't be serious. This is literally not an audible sound. So you made it so the hitsounds were the only thing that these notes were mapped to. That is ridiculous. Its almost like you wanted to attempt a hitsound job like imperishable night but only for 3 notes. Why??? are you really serious lol. i cant even say anything, (and hey, 2 QAT already coming here and not even both of them mentioned this is being inaudible or anything of sort.) this is 100% hearable i assure you. and thats about it. Go over youtube then head over the video of this song in Lanota, the official chart also map this part. and so does this one.
Alright lets talk about a couple things. The first is that you literally cannot use the justification that Lanota maps those notes, because we are talking about two completely separate games, the rules of each game's mapping do not correspond to the other. Secondly, listening to it again I do hear the notes. HOWEVER, this does not excuse the fact that 1) the hitsounds make the sound seem like they are more obvious than they are, which isn't necessarily a problem but does make it so that people with hitsounds are forced to play in a different way than people who don't use hitsounds, which is awkward in a map that is not 100% keysounded and 2) it is almost impossible for me to hear the sound on normal volume. I don't know if that's just my hearing but its annoying to have notes correspond to sounds that I literally can't hear. Not to mention that they aren't even represented differently as the get louder, maybe something that could be done by changing the lengths of the LNs?

01:08:260 (68260|3,68260|2,68260|0,68754|0,68754|1,69249|1,69249|2) - Both notes being held at a given time change pitch for each one and have eqaully emphatic percussion hits attached, so there isn't much of a reason to connect the LNs like this as opposed to making them all separate LN hand things there isnt much but one: 2 LNs are to cover a relatively loud-long-noises happen here. tbf only using one LN kinda lost its feel to me Thats not what I suggested. I suggested making it so the LNs aren't connected, and what I mean by that is this:

notes

01:16:172 (76172|3,76172|0,76667|2,76667|1,77161|2,77161|0) - Noticeable weaker synth and percussion, mapped exactly the same only pitch are changing. nothing sounds weaker or stronger. they are equal I would still disagree but w/e not the biggest deal

01:33:809 (93809|1) - This ln should start at 01:33:645 - its noticeably louder there (and probably a bit arbitrary if i do that since everything here is 1/2) I think I had a small debate about something like this in my ranked GD, where someone said that a synth sound started later because the peak of the sound started later than I had it. However, I would say that when it comes to synth, the peak is not as important to follow, since the nature of the sound means the peak will often not be where the sound instinctively starts

01:29:359 -
Ok I'm gonna go back to right here, where this section starts.
I don't know if mapping every 1/2 note is necessary. There are much more noticeable sounds that you seem to ignore (since you seem to be going for the melody + claps + kicks), namely the bass hit or whatever you want to call it. Plus there really isn't much of a discernable sound on every 1/2 beat that justifies this kind of mapping.
01:39:908 - HERE However, there is an extremely noticeable and loud percussion sound happening every 1/4 beat. This section should be noticeably different in terms of density/structure/patterning so that a transition through the obviously increasing intensity of the song can be seen and felt by players I strongly disagree with "loud percussion happening every 1/4 beat". apparently the 1/4 is only happening every time 1/2 beat is done, but thats just synth. the percussion will be probably at - 01:43:123 - and - 01:44:441 - here only. but i dont really want since it'lll break the overall concept i want to build here. like, the concept is goes on 1/2 from - 01:39:908 -, then goes 1/4 with the jtrill, then 1/8 with the Jstream
This one I'm confused about. How could you possibly disagree that the percussion that hits on every 1/4 note isn't noticeably louder starting at 01:39:908 - . It is so obvious that the sound is louder now. I fully stand by my statement, where there should at least be some difference in intensity between this section and the section right before it due to the quick change in percussion volume

02:02:326 - So some of these LNs don't really fit with the sound of the synth. Specifically, 02:02:491 (122491|3,122573|1,122738|3,122820|1,122985|2) - These 5 seem to be mapped to literally nothing heard at 100%, the buzz synth(?) pitch change for a moment and those LNs is to cover that The buzz synth by itself shouldn't add 5 extraneous lns before it. The LN for the buzz sound is totally fine, but the LN stream leading into it is massively overdone.

02:08:919 (128919|3) - Shouldn't this LN be twice as long i think that will be too cluttered since i'm also mapping kick 1/2 after Ok to be fair here it shouldn't be twice as long, only up to the red tick but either way, I'd still say its too short

02:11:557 - See, to me here, the synth really only deserves 1 LN representing it, whereas you could probably make the second one extended to help represent the background woosh thing. 02:12:051 - Like here, you have the woosh also mapped I would presume, though two of the LNs should be extended to represent this more clearly. probably, but i dont see anything thats "too wrong" in my current pattern mfw.

02:13:864 (133864|0,133947|0,134029|2,134112|2) - Why are these minijacks? They don't deviate at all from the 4 notes right before it from my perspective Jtrill doesnt seem to fit with the song situation. each jacks also mimicking the pitch and why am i making it jacks is to mimick the percussion. trill could works too but i think jacks is more fitting I didn't really say anything about jumptrills or anything, imo it would have just been better to see them as single streams rather than minijacks

02:15:183 - Shouldn't be a double

02:16:172 - Shouldn't be a double

02:19:963 (139963|1,139963|0,140128|0,140128|1) - Shouldn't be doubles?

02:20:458 (140458|3,140458|2,140623|2,140623|3) - Same?
Same for the patterns right after it too why? they are all obvious, loud drums I'll give you that. Didn't catch it the first time, was initially thinking that the ones i mentioned were just the same sound as the singles but youre right here

02:23:919 (143919|0,144002|1,144084|2,144167|0,144167|3,144249|1,144331|2,144414|3) - What was the logic behind this pattern? There is nothing supporting it, in fact, the synth only sounds on every 1/2 beat, not every 1/4th beat, so some of the LNs before it are also representing essentially nothing gradual pitch change. there's a slightly pitch change every 1/4 there. I would highly disagree. I would exclaim that, even if there was a minor pitch change every 1/4 beat, it is definitely not significant enough to warrant a completely separate LN

02:28:452 (148452|1) - Oh is this you trying to map the synth too??? This might just be you accidentally putting a ghost note in but if you want to seem like you are mapping the synth layer it with the percussion that you wanted it to map too at the lease instead of only placing notes that correspond to the synth when literally nothing else is there. if anyhting, thats not synths. its melody. all the synths is already mapped and could be recognized in where i put that loud hihat noises in HS I think youre missing the fact that the melody IS the synths, or at least the noticeable ones. Saying that youre not mapping the synths but you are mapping the melody is by itself a false statement because the melody is the synth. Either way its still a notable inconsistency

02:25:650 (145650|2) - Speaking of ghost notes I'm heading back a few seconds because this is definitely one regardless of whether you were trying to map the synth or not. This goes for every time there is one of those jump to hand things ^ Like I said, melody is the synth, and plus, there is literally no sound happening there, not even the synth

02:44:689 - Ok if anything I'm almost certain these should be 1/3 LNs the wubs? .....thats not straight 1/3, nor that the wubs has a distinct start place to be heard. so i'm goes with simplifying to 1/4 secondary synths for the sake of gameplay This one is more subjective I suppose but I still hear them as much slower than 1/4 wubs

02:45:842 - Wait what. WHY. Stop trying to make your maps more varied for the sake of having variation. It's LITERALLY THE SAME SOUND. There is no justifiable reason for why you would randomly change the entire structure of the kiai halfway through, other than the fact that the drums (and possibly also the synth) most notably get louder in the second half. Why would you put more emphasis on a completely new sound in the map despite the emphasis relative to the other sound (ie the drums emphasis in comparison to the synth) stays the same? If anything the map should just get denser in general while following the same concept you had developed just prior to it. This is the most effective way to handle something like this, as opposed to changing the entire concept. Not to mention that this second half of the kiai doesn't even stay consistent with mapping the synth sounds to LNs so I don't even know what to say (eg 02:48:974 (168974|3,169057|0,169139|3,169221|0,169304|3,169304|1) - none of these notes having any LN relevancy)
so apparently you saying that i should make the 2nd kiai the same as 1st but denser? you literally just complaining about being "boring" yet suggesting more boring stuff.
No one stop you to try a new concept for every. section. alone.
First off, yes I am absolutely trying to tell you to make the second half the same as the first half but denser or with some notable increase in intensity. Second off, doing this does the exact opposite of what you think I meant by boring. Making the second half more intense to match with the increased intensity of the song keeps players on their toes and makes sure they aren't sitting in the same stuff despite song development. You could argue that your LNs do this, but my statement from the actual mod that it goes against a vast majority of what you have set up in the rest of the map [/colors]

03:01:667 - Not sure why there are 1/4 notes placed between all the jumps tbh, since there isn't a noticeable sound there Ok sure there are synths but im almost certain they arent on the in-between beats

03:04:963 - Not a hand????? too cramped. with all the 1/4 happening Eh, I don't necessarily agree but w/e

03:06:117 (186117|2) - This note definitely shouldn't exist pointless awkward break. there's also synths. and its LNs to keep consistency 1) It is not a "pointless" awkward break if nothing in the music is supporting the note currently there. 2) The synths tone changes dont defend this in the same way they didnt before

03:05:787 - Also not sure why you made these all LN shields. Kind of deviates from anything else you do in the map, so it just feels random no response?

God ok I'm done with Ultimate.

I feel like I've said enough for one diff that it should be obvious some amount of discussion should be put forward. I hear so much about how the ranked section is complete garbage, and the fact that maps like this have the capability of making it through while having so many noticeable problems on a single difficulty just blows my mind. I didn't even explain that much about why I don't like 90% of the SVs put in this map. I said some basic general stuff in a couple of mods but I did not even finish what I wanted to say about them. My main point for that likely being related to my hatred of SVs for the sake of SVs, but w/e.

I heard it too, but with our current condition right now, not so much we can do. Not everyone is capable to replicate edgy-styled-maps, heavy SVs or anything like that (nor the song is not oftenly have something to support that). things that got popular, is the things that will get the attention the most and eventually become the example of the future maps. its just how community works. Be the change you want by ranking more of your maps so it can be an example later. maybe i'm not the one but hopefully, eventually it will be.

Not every maps could satisfy the whole community. there's always the one who simply dont like it.

your points seems to be heavily biased, and sometime you trying to alternate the concept that mappers did (already a violation to CoC itself). I guess my POV and yours is different towards the song, which is okay but if you start to force your POV to the mapper, thats where you wrong. your words of choice clearly saying that.

Alright lets talk about your final statement here.
1) "not much we can do". Sure there is, you just need to pay more attention to your maps and keep them from deviating from your central ideas with no rhyme or reason. I'm also trying to actively do something to help change the ranked maplist, which is what this mod is trying to at least start for me
2) I never said anything about trying to make "edgy-style" SVs in your map, nor did I even suggest any changes to your SVs outside of one situiation which was to improve the flow of the section, not to make them "edgy", whatever that means
3) "Be the change you want by ranking more of your maps so it can be an example later." I mean, I have a ranked map that I pushed to rank recently, so its not like I'm not doing something with this, and I also have projects planned to go for ranked. My additions to ranked also have nothing to do with this mapset and its relationship with the ranked system.
4) "your points seems to be heavily biased" and "you trying to alternate the concept that mappers did", the first portion of which I strayed extremely far away from any biases I had, taking only into account what you had already set up in the map, and the second portion, I only could have maybe implied this in one section, which I didn't even refute your rebuttal to in this response. I am definitively not suggesting you change your concept or your style, only making it more consistent to allign itself with the rest of your map and the song.
5) "your words of choice clearly saying that" So in this response I have made I wasn't intending to force my mapping philosophy, only trying to push this to more clearly allign with rankign and quality standards. Whether I did this aggressively is on me, but it doesn't mean that I am in the wrong for raising concerns with the map.

thanks for taking a look. sorry if my map doesnt seem to appeal in your eyes. it may not the most standout among the other as well, but this is simply how i portrayed my map towards this song.

PS sorry if there something wrong with my english :d
Your english was mostly understandable, and its no problem, but I highly implore you to get out of the mindset that you can't change anything about your map if only for the sake of getting it ranked sooner, as opposed to delaying it for the hopeful prospects of having a higher-quality beatmap, which you should try to do instead.

Thanks, and hopefully you read through this with a more open mind to other peoples' concerns (which by the way, are not shared only by myself)

TheToaphster wrote:

Alright this is fun
I really appreciate the fact that you denied literally everything

Ok, this post is going to refute some of the justifications for your patterns, but I'm going to put a focus on specific things. Namely, I am going to ignore any point where my sole argument is that its boring. This includes the intense wub seciton thing at 01:53:095 - , however, I still think my SV statement and suggestion are valid.

Alright and lastly before I start the actual rebuttal, there is one thing I want to explain right now.
I am a modder for this chart, not the mapper. Me pointing out concerns I have with the chart do not neccesitate me giving you suggestions for certain sections, it is fully your responsibility to find a solution when your map is approached with issues.

Anyways, lets start the rebuttal


00:01:997 - you ignored this sound and 00:09:909 - while paying attention to the sound at 00:04:964 - and 00:08:591 - (inconsistent within itself, this is extremely minor though) what sound? if there's anything i can hear of is only an echo of the first piano sound. that is almost barely noticeable. The fact that even none of the modder here even mentioned that, this is already explaining that those two point are worthless to be mapped. do note i'm only focusing to the prominent, hearable piano
First off, saying that no modders before me caught this, therefore I shouldn't have to change this, is invalid, given that the whole point of having multiple modders is so that people can catch things that other people didn't. Second off, there are sounds that are clearly audible that, yes, do correlate to what youre calling an "echo" of the first piano note. However, it is important to note that you actually do map notes to sounds that have the exact same volume and intensity, say comparing the sound at 00:01:997 - and the sound at 00:04:964 - . They are the same volume, same intensity, same purpose, but one has a note and one doesn't. This is clearly an inconsistency issue. Whether or not it can be written off as just a small mistake is out of my jurisdiction but is still something I should bring up regardless. // okay maybe i could heard that in the first point. but not at - 00:09:909 - however. The sounds occured there isnt piano, its rather like a small clap that getting overshadowed by the piano before


00:11:228 - Not a double while literally two notes later theres a double on the same sound. - 00:05:294 (5294|3) - look here. same with this
Ok? Then that is also a problem? This has no defense for why you do this, only exposing yourself for having this sort of inconsistency. // guess you missing the point. double is only used when the piano have a notably loud sound and at least a distance of 1/1 beats with another note before and after it.

00:19:057 (19057|1) - Why is this mapped? To make it flow better? Cuz theres no sound there hihat (not the hitsound. its actually exist)
No it doesn't. And if you actually think it doesn I would implore you to listen to it slowed down and compare what you hear to the stuff you mapped right before it. // i did, and my point still stand. i've been listening to this part, hundreds of time and i cannot ignore such obvious things afloat like nothing. idk how you couldnt heard the hihat here. i heard it pretty clearly myself

00:19:469 (19469|1,19469|0,19469|3) - no discernable difference between this and 00:19:799 (19799|2,19799|0,19799|3) - despite being noticeably different sounds how can you tell its "noticeably" different?
I really shouldn't have to explain why this is noticeably different. The second sound you mapped a hand to is louder than the one before, thus deserving of different layering effects, which you didn't do //uh arent they already different? 1st is |124| and the 2nd is |134|. the only thing is the same is the LN that covers the primary 1/2 long snare drum. both are the same kind. same kind of instrument = same placement sounds reasonable to me

00:23:013 (23013|0) - Same as before ^. kinda funny actually, you only mentioned the specific part despite almost all the similar synths have relatively same volume
When did we start talking about synth? Also when did we start talking about volume with this stuff? This mod was reffering to the 19:057 mod when it said same, which had nothing to do with synth and everything to do with percussion, an ignorance that I will give the same rebuttal to. // you're not. but i'm talking about my statement at - 00:19:057 (19057|1) - in which you implies "i heard nothing" while actually all the things occured here is the exact, same hihat like the others have (I wasnt meant to mention synths oops).

00:23:425 (23425|1,23425|0,23425|3) - see above in relation to 00:23:755 (23755|2,23755|1,23755|3) - ^^ //...yeah same

00:25:486 - So you decided to not map this note despite doing it before? if you meant this - 00:21:530 (21530|1) - , its intentional because i did the structure quite different, and so the player could handle these properly. What makes you think the player would have any trouble with the second set if they were able to handle the first set just fine? And also stating that you "changed" the structure of this section despite it not changing in the music enough to justify only supports the lack of quality and consistency // i could get away with this i think

Not mentioning any more consistency issues for that section. Please look over this. Also those LNs feel awkward to me being used in that way. This method of using long notes will eventually lead me to another point I'll be bringing up later which mostly has to do with you arbitrarily switching between mapping using lns and mapping without using lns. Going to still fully support my suggestion here

00:31:420 (31420|2,31502|1,31585|3) - I don't see a point in deviating from the already established trill thing you were doing, which legitimately made sense and was somewhat interesting there's 3 triple (or "hands" if you more comfortable with that term) in-between these transition. okay maybe i still could do the trill but it will be unecessarily heavy with 3 stacks happend in two columns at the same time So I understand what you mean here, Idk I guess it just doesn't really feel right? I'll say that this is something that could stay given the circumstances, though I don't necessarily like the lack of clarity between the three hands given that all three of them are different from each other in terms of sound, though that much might be difficult to avoid here

00:32:986 (32986|2,32986|1,32986|3,33151|3,33151|2,33151|0) - Why did you make these two different hands. Why not make them both [234] hands. They are literally the same exact sound and have no reason being different. 2nd hands act as an opening to the next section. particularly that works too but i feel the concept is better be like this
Eh, I personally disagree with purposely avoiding a more representative pattern in order to lead players into a section despite the transition being relatively easy with respect to the rest of the chart // huh? isnt mapping is about how you represent each sound with pattern towards the song? if that could do, why doing it in a very mainstream way

00:40:898 (40898|2,40898|1,40898|3,41227|1,41227|3,41227|2) - Not really an inconsistency mod but why are these not extended to be full 1/2 lns. There is no sound here that doesn't end on the 1/2 note tick cymbals sounds slightly longer here. you can notice it more clearly at 25% but generally you should be easily heard it when playing
You misunderstood this I think, what I meant is that the sound is longer than what you have mapped. Though this is pretty minor so w/e // ah, but i'm still pretty sure those cymbals only exist for 1/2

00:45:760 (45760|1) - This is a ghost note 100% sure this is a piano Ok no. The last piano sound for this is on 00:45:678 - , and you can definitely tell by listening to the gap between the last piano and the drum hit that begins the next measure //Its not. sigh* how cant you heard such obvious piano here? the piano is obviously still continuing. its just.... weird when i play this without that note because of how obvious it is. not to mention there's also a slightly pitch change for the piano there

Ok I'm, going to take a break from this inconsistency stuff for a second.



Are you actually serious?????

What even is this?

1) There is no discernable difference between the heavier percussion sounds and the main melody (which seems to be something you entirely focused on for everything before this section)

2) This is actually the most boring and simple choice you could have made for this section, and may actually be the most boring part of the map

3) It initially implies that 3-note jump jacks will be the focus of the section and then deviates from that.

4) 3-note jacks are actually what make the most sense here

5) This section is way dumbed down presumably because jAcKs ArE HaRd

6) The SVs are actually worthless and seems like they were used solely because you realized this section was boring and wanted to "spice it up"

This literally follows all but one of my general complaints about the map.
........and then what? looks like you didnt have anything against these in general since you dont even provide solution (and probably i wont even accept because i can imagine how cluttered it will be if i do adding another note to make it hands for the claps)
This part is extraordinarily important that you fix. It is not good. It is also not my job to give you suggestions for how to fix it. However, I will give you a suggestion on top of Gekido-'s that has already been shared since you seem to be incapable of it on your own. // uh you're a modder. its essential to provide solution for every single point you think it could be better. especially in a qualified because every mapper will always think "my pattern works the best" since your ways of saying it is highly subjective with no backing up rather than rant. gather more ideas and then combined so both parties agree. isnt that what you modding for? (or you just literally hate everything in this set)

suggestion

How about something like this? Ditching the jumps will allow you to make this section more representative of the section of music, incorporate the 3-note jacks like I said would likely fit the best here, and would also let you differentiate between the quiter and louder drum kicks. Not to mention that Gekido-'s also allowed for this while keeping essentially the same note density as yours. Also to note that in mine you *might* (a LOT of emphasis on this might) even be able to put an extra note before each jump and hand to even make my suggestion keep the same density as yours.[/color] // i'll be using gekido's for this time.

Back to general mods/inconsistency stuff

00:57:711 (57711|3,58205|0,58700|2) - hold on you can't be serious. This is literally not an audible sound. So you made it so the hitsounds were the only thing that these notes were mapped to. That is ridiculous. Its almost like you wanted to attempt a hitsound job like imperishable night but only for 3 notes. Why??? are you really serious lol. i cant even say anything, (and hey, 2 QAT already coming here and not even both of them mentioned this is being inaudible or anything of sort.) this is 100% hearable i assure you. and thats about it. Go over youtube then head over the video of this song in Lanota, the official chart also map this part. and so does this one.
Alright lets talk about a couple things. The first is that you literally cannot use the justification that Lanota maps those notes, because we are talking about two completely separate games, the rules of each game's mapping do not correspond to the other. Secondly, listening to it again I do hear the notes. HOWEVER, this does not excuse the fact that 1) the hitsounds make the sound seem like they are more obvious than they are, which isn't necessarily a problem but does make it so that people with hitsounds are forced to play in a different way than people who don't use hitsounds, which is awkward in a map that is not 100% keysounded and 2) it is almost impossible for me to hear the sound on normal volume. I don't know if that's just my hearing but its annoying to have notes correspond to sounds that I literally can't hear. Not to mention that they aren't even represented differently as the get louder, maybe something that could be done by changing the lengths of the LNs? //i'm implying if they do, then they are also aware that this "ghost notes" actually has sounds. they are just a little bit overshadowed by the 1/6 stream from the section before but i simply cannot ignore what is obvious in my ear. i'm also playing this without an fx volume and i'm still clearly heard it. at least when you are using headphones or something like that.

01:08:260 (68260|3,68260|2,68260|0,68754|0,68754|1,69249|1,69249|2) - Both notes being held at a given time change pitch for each one and have eqaully emphatic percussion hits attached, so there isn't much of a reason to connect the LNs like this as opposed to making them all separate LN hand things there isnt much but one: 2 LNs are to cover a relatively loud-long-noises happen here. tbf only using one LN kinda lost its feel to me Thats not what I suggested. I suggested making it so the LNs aren't connected, and what I mean by that is this: // i feel like that will kinda removed the LN gimmick i've been doing, although not relatively in a dense appearance (that happens in most of LN themed chart) but its somehow could be an approach towards the LN shields gimmick too in the 2nd half of the song later

notes

01:16:172 (76172|3,76172|0,76667|2,76667|1,77161|2,77161|0) - Noticeable weaker synth and percussion, mapped exactly the same only pitch are changing. nothing sounds weaker or stronger. they are equal I would still disagree but w/e not the biggest deal

01:33:809 (93809|1) - This ln should start at 01:33:645 - its noticeably louder there (and probably a bit arbitrary if i do that since everything here is 1/2) I think I had a small debate about something like this in my ranked GD, where someone said that a synth sound started later because the peak of the sound started later than I had it. However, I would say that when it comes to synth, the peak is not as important to follow, since the nature of the sound means the peak will often not be where the sound instinctively starts

01:29:359 -
Ok I'm gonna go back to right here, where this section starts.
I don't know if mapping every 1/2 note is necessary. There are much more noticeable sounds that you seem to ignore (since you seem to be going for the melody + claps + kicks), namely the bass hit or whatever you want to call it. Plus there really isn't much of a discernable sound on every 1/2 beat that justifies this kind of mapping.
01:39:908 - HERE However, there is an extremely noticeable and loud percussion sound happening every 1/4 beat. This section should be noticeably different in terms of density/structure/patterning so that a transition through the obviously increasing intensity of the song can be seen and felt by players I strongly disagree with "loud percussion happening every 1/4 beat". apparently the 1/4 is only happening every time 1/2 beat is done, but thats just synth. the percussion will be probably at - 01:43:123 - and - 01:44:441 - here only. but i dont really want since it'lll break the overall concept i want to build here. like, the concept is goes on 1/2 from - 01:39:908 -, then goes 1/4 with the jtrill, then 1/8 with the Jstream
This one I'm confused about. How could you possibly disagree that the percussion that hits on every 1/4 note isn't noticeably louder starting at 01:39:908 - . It is so obvious that the sound is louder now. I fully stand by my statement, where there should at least be some difference in intensity between this section and the section right before it due to the quick change in percussion volume

02:02:326 - So some of these LNs don't really fit with the sound of the synth. Specifically, 02:02:491 (122491|3,122573|1,122738|3,122820|1,122985|2) - These 5 seem to be mapped to literally nothing heard at 100%, the buzz synth(?) pitch change for a moment and those LNs is to cover that The buzz synth by itself shouldn't add 5 extraneous lns before it. The LN for the buzz sound is totally fine, but the LN stream leading into it is massively overdone.

02:08:919 (128919|3) - Shouldn't this LN be twice as long i think that will be too cluttered since i'm also mapping kick 1/2 after Ok to be fair here it shouldn't be twice as long, only up to the red tick but either way, I'd still say its too short

02:11:557 - See, to me here, the synth really only deserves 1 LN representing it, whereas you could probably make the second one extended to help represent the background woosh thing. 02:12:051 - Like here, you have the woosh also mapped I would presume, though two of the LNs should be extended to represent this more clearly. probably, but i dont see anything thats "too wrong" in my current pattern mfw.

02:13:864 (133864|0,133947|0,134029|2,134112|2) - Why are these minijacks? They don't deviate at all from the 4 notes right before it from my perspective Jtrill doesnt seem to fit with the song situation. each jacks also mimicking the pitch and why am i making it jacks is to mimick the percussion. trill could works too but i think jacks is more fitting I didn't really say anything about jumptrills or anything, imo it would have just been better to see them as single streams rather than minijacks // that is.... kinda straightforward? the noise pitch (not the drum pitch) is divided into two here. if i do straight roll... idk that doesnt really suit my vision

02:15:183 - Shouldn't be a double

02:16:172 - Shouldn't be a double

02:19:963 (139963|1,139963|0,140128|0,140128|1) - Shouldn't be doubles?

02:20:458 (140458|3,140458|2,140623|2,140623|3) - Same?
Same for the patterns right after it too why? they are all obvious, loud drums I'll give you that. Didn't catch it the first time, was initially thinking that the ones i mentioned were just the same sound as the singles but youre right here

02:23:919 (143919|0,144002|1,144084|2,144167|0,144167|3,144249|1,144331|2,144414|3) - What was the logic behind this pattern? There is nothing supporting it, in fact, the synth only sounds on every 1/2 beat, not every 1/4th beat, so some of the LNs before it are also representing essentially nothing gradual pitch change. there's a slightly pitch change every 1/4 there. I would highly disagree. I would exclaim that, even if there was a minor pitch change every 1/4 beat, it is definitely not significant enough to warrant a completely separate LN

02:28:452 (148452|1) - Oh is this you trying to map the synth too??? This might just be you accidentally putting a ghost note in but if you want to seem like you are mapping the synth layer it with the percussion that you wanted it to map too at the lease instead of only placing notes that correspond to the synth when literally nothing else is there. if anyhting, thats not synths. its melody. all the synths is already mapped and could be recognized in where i put that loud hihat noises in HS I think youre missing the fact that the melody IS the synths, or at least the noticeable ones. Saying that youre not mapping the synths but you are mapping the melody is by itself a false statement because the melody is the synth. Either way its still a notable inconsistency // what i was try to saying is that i map them both but w/e might change later

02:25:650 (145650|2) - Speaking of ghost notes I'm heading back a few seconds because this is definitely one regardless of whether you were trying to map the synth or not. This goes for every time there is one of those jump to hand things ^ Like I said, melody is the synth, and plus, there is literally no sound happening there, not even the synth

02:44:689 - Ok if anything I'm almost certain these should be 1/3 LNs the wubs? .....thats not straight 1/3, nor that the wubs has a distinct start place to be heard. so i'm goes with simplifying to 1/4 secondary synths for the sake of gameplay This one is more subjective I suppose but I still hear them as much slower than 1/4 wubs

02:45:842 - Wait what. WHY. Stop trying to make your maps more varied for the sake of having variation. It's LITERALLY THE SAME SOUND. There is no justifiable reason for why you would randomly change the entire structure of the kiai halfway through, other than the fact that the drums (and possibly also the synth) most notably get louder in the second half. Why would you put more emphasis on a completely new sound in the map despite the emphasis relative to the other sound (ie the drums emphasis in comparison to the synth) stays the same? If anything the map should just get denser in general while following the same concept you had developed just prior to it. This is the most effective way to handle something like this, as opposed to changing the entire concept. Not to mention that this second half of the kiai doesn't even stay consistent with mapping the synth sounds to LNs so I don't even know what to say (eg 02:48:974 (168974|3,169057|0,169139|3,169221|0,169304|3,169304|1) - none of these notes having any LN relevancy)
so apparently you saying that i should make the 2nd kiai the same as 1st but denser? you literally just complaining about being "boring" yet suggesting more boring stuff.
No one stop you to try a new concept for every. section. alone.
First off, yes I am absolutely trying to tell you to make the second half the same as the first half but denser or with some notable increase in intensity. Second off, doing this does the exact opposite of what you think I meant by boring. Making the second half more intense to match with the increased intensity of the song keeps players on their toes and makes sure they aren't sitting in the same stuff despite song development. You could argue that your LNs do this, but my statement from the actual mod that it goes against a vast majority of what you have set up in the rest of the map // to start with, there is nothing wrong to estabilish a new set of ideas near the end of a song. say its because this part is a climax part. 2nd, this LN is fairly easy to manage, or at least, its not that hard compared with what i've been doing with the majority. its not like this part is filled with heavy shields and stuff as it is will totally turn the concept 180 degree from the first kiai. 3rd, as dense as it sounds, the distinct noise that could be hearded remain the same. the dense of the chorus part between kiais noticeable in 100% but the distinct noise stays. so if you actually talking about making this more dense, do i have to cover kicks by triple and claps with quads? or relatively adding more notes on 1/4? in theory it could but its becoming overemphasized too much. (i missed some i think so lets see how it goes later)

03:01:667 - Not sure why there are 1/4 notes placed between all the jumps tbh, since there isn't a noticeable sound there synths Ok sure there are synths but im almost certain they arent on the in-between beats

03:04:963 - Not a hand????? too cramped. with all the 1/4 happening Eh, I don't necessarily agree but w/e // its also done so i could transitioning the trill without havin an unecessary minijacks

03:06:117 (186117|2) - This note definitely shouldn't exist pointless awkward break. there's also synths. and its LNs to keep consistency 1) It is not a "pointless" awkward break if nothing in the music is supporting the note currently there. 2) The synths tone changes dont defend this in the same way they didnt before

03:05:787 - Also not sure why you made these all LN shields. Kind of deviates from anything else you do in the map, so it just feels random no response? // its feels like the song could have that? so why not. sequential long noises is obviously heard

TheToaphster wrote:

Staying consistent imo isn't just a quality of a map keeping the same sounds mapped in the same way throughout a map or section, but also making logical decisions as to where you can deviate from ideas that you've already set up, something I brought up a multitude of times through my mod. Introducing ideas that don't make sense with respect to how you have been developing the map through the song show a lack of consistent additions and layering.

I'm agree with consistency. but, you really should hear how the song develops. This isnt your everyday generic anime/pop songs where they could have 3 choruses with similar orientation. leaving with no choice to stay consistent with layering, but they could do something to make the patterning more various and has an obvious separation in-between section to reflect each other.

I dont really get what you mean by "logical" as this map is clearly what you saying and what i've been doing ever since the start. each section has a different instrument orientation, thus the ideas of different patterning and sometimes different layering

Take the ending chorus, for example, where Rivals applies an idea that makes some amount of logical sense with respect to the rest of the map (albeit a little bit weak in terms of difficulty comparatively but that isn't necessarily a huge problem), but then through the second half, adds in a completely new layer (that being of long notes), despite the only change in the song being related to the volume of that section. I would consider this a random introduction of a new idea despite no similar introductions of ideas in the song, though maybe that's just an overreaction on my part.

This song, outside the 2 chorus, there is no place that have a similar instrument orientation throughout. so the consistency patterning you've been saying here are a little too much to ask as the song literally have different concepts each section. thus, the idea differs on each section. The first half of the song consists of relatively easy-to-follow rythmic, with exception on 1/3 section which is quite hard. The 2nd half after the burst, it goes relatively hard compared with the first half where you faced an SV section that test up your reading (and acc), then a syncopated drum section, ended with burst and relatively simple LN shields. into the chorus i made it to follow melod+synth as well with the percussion. the 2nd then goes almost the same with additional LN to cover primary melody as to test the agility (idk how to worded it clearly)

Its all to justifies the difficulty of being (almost) 5* because of the burst. we literally hear complaints about some maps that is mostly easy but its almost 6* just because the spike, in comparison it doesnt fair with the majority of difficulty and cause a rage for being "PP giveaway"

[Proxy] wrote:

rank this again pls :<

qqqant wrote:

please give me an explanation of the minijacks in the first main kiai aside from "its just making it harder"
the minijacks present when there's 2 melody occuring two times in only 1/4th space and its the same pitch. notice how - 02:27:628 (147628|0,147711|0) - 02:28:287 (148287|0,148370|0,148782|2,148864|2) - and so on has a same pitch. unlike - 02:25:320 (145320|1,145320|0,145485|1,145485|0) - in which they are on 1/2 distance, or - 02:25:485 (145485|0,145485|1,145568|3,145568|2) - that is on 1/4th but has different pitch

02:06:859 - if you look at the minijacks that follow, you can see that there are 4 left hand minijacks (02:08:178 - , 02:10:815 - , 02:13:864 - ) there's a clear hand imbalance in this section. could u explain if theres some reason you do this?
this jacks is kind of lower pitch if i may say that, or some kind of deep bass thing. hence in there. I kinda disagree with "imbalance" since its like 2 seconds in-between them (its not that they are happening sequentively) and by that 2 seconds, there's so much happening in the right side too like 5 note-stacks so its kinda impasse for me.
(i also do it like half consciously because when it comes to testplaying my left hand is more relient with jacks)
the last timestamps is different. the patterning plays drum but the placement portrays the melody. - 02:13:864 (133864|0,133947|0) - melody is lower than - 02:14:029 (134029|2,134112|2) -

https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/11031852 would also like an explanation of this, and how this fits in to the music basically, its kinda happening because i want - 02:22:765 (142765|2,142765|1) - to be in the middle so it gives an equivalent impact on both sides. its also because i also need to minimalize the jacks like http://puu.sh/At1Ez/535b40384a.png or http://puu.sh/At1GK/c3341631aa.png (if you trying to follow pitch music, if thats what were you referring to) which imo not that suitable considering its happening on streams

another reason is - 02:23:178 (143178|3,143219|2,143260|1,143301|0,143342|2,143384|1) - this group has different sets of buildup with - 02:22:930 (142930|0,142971|1,143013|2,143054|3,143095|0,143136|1) - so its....clearly distinguishable buildup(?) (idk how to word that)

Alternater wrote:

C3S_s.wav is 7100% hitvolume 03:02:161 (182161|3) - you can keep if u want, I don't want this to get DQ over one hitsound problem. Just scared the shits out of me lmao

FAMoss wrote:

Alternater wrote:

C3S_s.wav is 7100% hitvolume 03:02:161 (182161|3) - you can keep if u want, I don't want this to get DQ over one hitsound problem. Just scared the shits out of me lmao

its okay, the volume in game is still balanced, you can click those note and compare with this note 03:02:326 (182326|3) - its still 100 volume, no more

Bakuretsue wrote:

FAMoss wrote:

its okay, the volume in game is still balanced, you can click those note and compare with this note 03:02:326 (182326|3) - its still 100 volume, no more

I noticed it IN GAME :p. It suprised me BN's hadn't noticed this note while qualifying