its big
Kuo Kyoka wrote:
not an actual mod, and I don't have time for it either, but since I'm already take a look a it, so maybe a little suggestions I guess so
[Ultimate]
To be honest, that intro keysound is just painful to listen to
As I've listen to this song a lot of time already, so something different in the pitch would really make the song experience goes awkward
Feeling like: 00:04:305 (4305|1) - 00:04:964 (4964|1) - 00:06:613 (6613|2) - 00:07:602 (7602|0,7602|3) - 00:08:261 (8261|3,8261|2) - 00:08:591 (8591|0) - 00:10:239 (10239|1) - 00:12:217 (12217|2) - 00:12:876 (12876|0) - 00:14:525 (14525|3) - 00:15:514 (15514|2,15514|1) - most likely are wrong, either they're too low or too high in the pitch sounds
Still, I don't have any suggestion either, because I'm not that good in creating keysounds with piano pitch, but I hope it would be better
i had a conversation with protastic earlier about this. the beginning keysound part has to actually be differentiated a little bit due to it goes "too blended" which is we know thats against RC
tbf i'm not much of an expert of KS either but still, it make sense in the ear at least
00:33:151 - i choke'd here, maybe because played on Lanota only have the main notes on 00:32:986 (32986|2,32986|1,32986|3,33151|3,33151|2,33151|0) - or the SV actual make me suprised, eventually, 00:33:315 (33315|1,33398|3) - this one sounds isn't so notable imo, while 00:33:480 - are actually louder and either to management
as far as i want this chart to be close to Lanota, cant agree the fact that there's a synths. and hearable at that too so yeah wont be hurt if the synths actually getting highlighted too
00:39:249 (39249|1) - wrong piano keysound pitch, it should be even lower than 00:38:260 (38260|0) - i dont really get here. this KS is actually match, at least in a sense
00:41:227 - in here should have a piano keysound with the same pitch of 00:40:898 - could work actually but the actual piano is only exist at the first one
00:47:821 (47821|0,48315|3,48645|0,48810|1) - just these are too high tho, make it lower again, if we actually demand on the RC i cant really change it unless it goes way too far from the actual pitch. these 4 along with the piano noise from the song is perfetly match the accompanied KS so i guess its just ok with
01:28:947 (88947|2,89112|1,89276|0) - I know you're following drum here, but following the melody on here is more better imo, follow with the current melody, it should be start on 01:28:535 - (suggestion: https://puu.sh/zbVcK/efd591d8da.png)
i could agree with this but it doesnt seem necessary. the melody here going quite fast, i guess not so many people would actually heard the difference
01:30:018 - on here definitely have the same clap sound volume with 01:29:689 - 01:30:348 - 01:30:678 - 01:31:007 - etc. but why it's 3 notes here (?) It's different from 01:31:337 - since it have kick sound in here but on 01:30:018 - didn't (already turn off hitsound to check this part)
Same to upcoming part, 01:32:656 - 01:35:293 - 01:37:930 -
take a look again. both clap you mentioned, the triple one, and the double one, had a different type. The triple has LR4 type clap @30% along with LR2 @25%x2, while the double one has only LR2 type clap both @15% . They do sounds louder and each triple the LR4 clap has relatively longer sound than an LR2 Clap
01:38:590 - would be better to make it have a LN start on here till 01:38:919 - and don't have this note 01:38:754 (98754|2) - which actually following the song in this part more accurate since you tend to following that upcoming synth sounds while 01:38:754 (98754|2) - don't have that kind of sound like that
its an alternative i think but my POV on this is that there's an upcoming synths every 1/2 which i think its more than a worth to be highly emphasized
Feels kinda odd when this is the pattern 01:42:546 (102546|0,102546|2,102711|2,102711|1,102875|3,102875|1,103040|0,103040|3) - and it's the same 3 times maybe its just you
01:54:084 (114084|0,114167|2,114249|0,114331|2,114414|0,114496|2,114579|0,114661|2) - actually I don't really get the ideas why it should be this pattern for the rest of this part (ex: 01:56:721 (116721|3,116804|0,116886|3,116969|0,117051|3,117134|0,117216|3,117298|0) - 01:58:370 (118370|2,118452|1,118535|2,118617|1,118700|2,118782|1,118864|2,118947|1) - etc.) If you notice it, it has the change in pitch too, it's not same pitch for this whole part, just weird feel and awkward while playing actually (from here till the end of this ↑ ↓ part, you know what I mean :wink:) xd i guess that works too since i had it in mind but it feels really just.... cluttered that way. with a lot of chords to handle, unlike lanota's chart.
01:58:864 - this is actually 1/6, not 1/4 its not? actually i was following a noise thing that has been continued on 1/4 before
02:02:491 - keysound missed a sound on here we focused to drum on here. since its the thing that you can heard and recognize first while you here
02:01:996 (121996|1) - this one sounds actually kinda accurate but just feels empty somehow not sure what you mean by empty here
02:02:820 (122820|1) - I don't understand this part, if you're somehow following 1/2 LN like this, then isn't it should be like them too (?)
Plus, it goes continously on 02:02:820 (122820|1,122903|3,122985|2,123068|0) - while 02:02:985 (122985|2) - is 1/2 but 02:02:820 (122820|1) - isn't the 1/2 LN does have a longer sound. its what i heard on 100% anyway, and no one probably notice that little of a difference
02:02:738 (122738|3) - ghost note, I don't heard any sounds here its a kind of secondary synths buildup alongside the LN one
While 02:08:178 (128178|1,128178|0) - is kick and 02:08:260 - is snare, wouldn't be a good idea when it's 2 notes jack here, for the better understandment, moving 02:08:260 (128260|1) - to | 3 | is better imo, I know you want to make it easier for playability but any still works well like you said then. its for playability purposes (besides, that kind of jacking you suggest is kinda generic nowadays so some difference here and there wouldnt be too much xd).
02:08:919 - This part actually a bit weird to me, yeah it have sounds on 1/4, just 02:09:167 (129167|1,129331|0) - change to LN make it more challenge plus accurate with the song more imo i think i get what you mean to catch by the LNs but tbh i feel like this is pmuch more manageable and to top of that is predictable
02:10:485 (130485|3) - this one supposed to be on 02:10:568 - and end on 02:10:732 - The LNs were supposed to not exactly landing on 1/4 tbh, its rather on 1/6 on precise but had to sacrifice them for the sake of playability. The start however, accounting with the playability part had to start it here since imo its just too cluttered while other part doing it consistently
02:13:864 (133864|0,133947|0,134029|2,134112|2) - those are not same pitch anyhow, still, 02:13:864 (133864|0,133947|0) - is the same loud as 02:13:700 (133700|1,133700|0,133782|3,133782|2) - would still suggest to make it 2 notes here instead both jacks, despite following the drum, is not exactly following the drum pitch, but the melody pitch that is going for a bit. the part is rather not chaotic too so a rather lighter patterning is done
02:23:425 - ehm, what I can heard is the melody on 02:23:425 - 02:23:590 - 02:23:754 - 02:23:837 - 02:23:919 - 02:24:084 - 02:24:249 -
I don't know what are those extra one for, more likely are ghosts to me
Plus, 02:24:084 - 02:24:249 - is 1/6 if you're trying to add normal notes i kinda want to map the buildup here tbh, and each of 1/4 LNs has an actual low synths mapped. it is mapped with LNs too indicate the buildup
02:32:903 - got sound on here too, a little bit hard to recognizes but sure it has (flows raising higher on here)
02:34:057 - same, got sound on here too, plus a similar part (02:28:782 -) i suppose that true, but most of them break the consistency in some part so would rather did the noticeable one
Since this part is coming to loop on next up and this is the end of the first part (02:34:634 - ), why not making it different from the current only-notes by adding some LNs here (suggestion: https://puu.sh/zbWeF/559da99cb0.png) uhhh no. this first chorus was intended to be non-LN and then goes LN in the 2nd one. pmuch the concept
02:38:178 - got sound on here too, would be better to add a note on here
02:39:496 - well, i guess i missed that probably because i mostly mapped a synths rather than a melody but doesnt seem to be a worth of a DQ, atm at least
02:43:700 - are you following the melody synth on here? If that so, 02:43:864 (163864|0) - should be start on 02:43:947 - and 02:44:029 (164029|3) - shouldn't be exist (or you can keep for that BG sound too, but still, it starts on 02:43:947 - too, try to catch it again actually no. it was following some kind of uh idk..... bzzz thing?
Suggestion: https://puu.sh/zbWnD/d6145e4987.png (02:44:689 - ) could works, but dont want the last part to be LN-y since theres SVs that could affecting the length and manipulated the player
02:54:496 (174496|1,174579|0) - this one is actually same pitch, you can either keep them or merge them like 02:49:386 (169386|2) - or you can seperate 02:49:386 (169386|2) - into like that 2 LNs too there's a tiny-bity slight of difference between the two. in 100% play, the one LN thing is do obvious enough to be hearded as one but the 2 separate LNs one, that you mentioned has slight difference heard with the LN you previously mention. thus the difference between them. its kinda odd if its like you said imo
02:55:156 (175156|3) - make into LN for the melody?
(Some parts I hardly to understand whenever you use 1/2 and 1/4 LNs) i particularly only mapped the obvious sound that is hearded on 100% playback. this part is too chaotic to be too accurate
03:06:117 (186117|2) - actually there is no melody like 03:05:787 (185787|3,185787|2,185870|1,185952|0) - on here
Can understand that is 2 notes because it's just fresh start, and 03:06:200 (186200|3,186200|0) - it's a new start from the breaker on 03:06:117 - but what about 03:06:447 (186447|3,186447|1) - here? there's some kind of wobble noises in the BG along with the melody. i guess thats pretty worthy too along with the melody. and i keep the direction of the LN and the length the same as the others for mainly consistency sake
Nope, not a SV-Elitist, I skipped SV CheckSVs is a social construct anyways
Also "click.wav" isn't exceeded 100ms and "D3S_s", "F#3S_Gb3S_s", "LR3_BassDropPDG" and "E3S_s" is kinda delayed
While "LR_HiHat Click", "LR_HiHat Click2" did exceeded 100ms but only by a little, so I would suggest to add a blank part for like 10~20ms for them for more safer
click has 280 ms on my end :thinking:. else is might be rather delayed but nothing unrankable. i could make a pack of fixed HS and make it downloadable via description later anyways
the last 2 one is a bit of a threshold but not necessary. could do the pack as i said earlier
Would wish to check the other difficulties too but I really don't have that much time
So anyway, good luck there!
thanks for taking a look! honestly if you were come a little bit earlier, i could've applied some of this :/
maybe when this does got DQ later, will reconsider what you tell. but for now, gotta gather the community attention first so i could get more feedback (maybe)