P A N
P A N wrote:
[General][Savage]
- well, nothing wrong XD
Hitsounds were revamped so any HS related things are left blank[Hard]
- 00:08:086 (6,7) - these two could add finish, to follow the song.
- 00:19:494 (5,6) - I want to suggest you to stretch these two slider to 3/4 http://puu.sh/uxRhb/a5f643ddf6.jpg these rhythm is kinda unique so I think there need something different that is not normally 1/2, It's also give more feeling. This isn't a bad idea, but I can't seem to find a pattern that works here without feeling awkward. I'll try and experiment
- 00:24:776 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - maybe less their spacing like 00:26:043 (3,4,5,6,7,8) ? I think it's not strong enough to be spaced like 00:23:719 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7) and more. It even weaker than 00:26:043 (3,4,5,6,7,8) imo. What I was doing here is trying to continue the sudden trumpet noise intensity in the background, which disappears by the time the second set of triples rolls around (hence why they were spaced so low) but yeah the first set isn't nearly intense enough to justify the same spacing as the ones before it
- 00:28:579 (1,2) - how fast of slider doesn't fit with spacing imo. fast slider but short spacing make it less flow so I think make them further is better. something like http://puu.sh/uxXTI/9a29a73527.jpg I'll consider this but I think it's okay
- 00:40:198 (7) - replace with two circles fits better imo. sound on tail is pretty strong so change to circle and make some jump is more fun to play. Agreed
- 00:40:621 (1) - I think this slider is more fit with the song if it's slower and stretch to 3/4. Not a bad idea.
- 01:00:480 (6) - aaa ctrl+g is more flow I think but I don't force your style XD Mmmmf I'll be honest I don't like this either, I have some ideas how to make it work a bit better but implementing them is so much work :c
- 01:05:339 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - same As above
- 01:09:142 (1,2,3,1) - same As above
- 02:08:297 (8) - 1.50x spacing is more fit imo, not overjumped. Will check
- 00:19:917 (6) - sampleset-drum clap sounds better and will be consistency with 00:26:678 (8)
- 01:05:445 (2) - remove sampleset-drum for consistency?
- 01:11:043 (1,3) - whistle on tail?
- I think you still need to add many finish hitsound for example 01:48:227 (1) , 01:44:846 (1) and etc.
[Normal]
- 00:08:508 (1,2,3) - aaa it looks more like spacing error tbh, because they are the only part that has spacing like this even the rhythm is not that different with other pattern. use the same spacing as other part? Fair enough, this isn't very pretty
- 00:28:156 (5) - looks like spacing error, move it further. All righty
- 00:54:776 (1) - this kind of pattern no need NC imo. Okay
- same hitsound suggestion as savage diff.
- 00:09:353 (1) - no need NC. Ah yeah
[Easy]
- you did very good on this diff, some note might off the playfield? such as 02:01:325 (4), otherwise it's perfect. In test mode it's on the playfield so should be okay? I dunno about 4:3 though
this mapset is very neat, good luck !! XD Thanks for a good mod and good luck on your marathon! Ponytail~
- 01:24:565 (1,2,3) - this rhythm is pretty weird for beginner tbh, they always got told that just follow the drum but this rhythm is vocal instead of drum. follow drum instead like you did on 01:38:086 (1,2,3) is better imo. Sure
- 01:31:325 (1,2,3) - same here, beginner can't pay attention that much to the vocal imo. they focus on approach circle and drum. (I teach many beginner player here XD)All righty
Hobbes
Hobbes2 wrote:
Hey, sorry for being late :/ Anyone's late, it's me
[Easy]
I hate to be that guy but some of these blankets could honestly be better, stuff like 00:16:959 (1,2), 00:36:396 (4,1), 00:45:269 (2,3), etc. Pretty fine overall though. I don't mind blanket mods. I'll try to get them all checked
01:16:959 (1) - dont think this NC was intentional huh. That shouldn't be there
pretty solid easy diff, just be sure to clean up your blankets and stuff
[Normal]
00:26:255 (3,4,1) - Stuff like this doesnt look so good in practice because the gaps between objects aren't the same. this image should help visualize - http://imgur.com/a/p4hPz You have a point, I'll try to adjust this a bit
01:16:114 (1) - might be nice if this shape is symmetrical just like the previous few patterns were Tried to fix this
01:34:705 (1) - starting here until the end of the second kiai there's just a continuous stream of objects, would be nice if you could put a gap in there so the player has at least some downtime I know and Lanturn cautioned me that it was bordering on "Advanced vs Normal" but I think the intensity level should be matched and there isn't really a good spot for a break :c
01:51:607 (1) - Think it's better if this is split into two circles, both the head and tail of this slider have an equal "finish" impact to them, so it would fit better as 2 circles.
01:54:987 (1) - ^ and the other 2 of these I was mapping more to lyrics here in this section but in all the other diffs I've sorta done the finish thing so I'll try to make it work
02:03:860 (3,4) - work on this a bit more, the blanket's off and the shape itself isn't that good looking either Adjusted a bit
[Hard]
00:08:086 (5,6,1,2) - dont like this pattern, the spacing is pretty big and 00:08:297 (6,1,2) - makes a very uncomfortable wide angle which I don't really fits this part of the music. Changed this as per previous mod
00:09:353 (1) - this NC isnt needed Changed as per previous mod
00:17:276 (2) - I dont think the sound here is prominent enough to be worth mapping, triplets in hards should be reserved for obvious sounds imo I kind of agree tbh
00:47:593 (2,3) - recommend keeping this look of having the reverse slider point at the circle for 00:48:227 (4,5) - too I tried to point them where they were going next
01:06:818 - should be clickable, along with 01:07:240. Maybe you could do 1/4 slider into circle? I mapped the guitar triples here over the continuing noise from before, which is why the focus is before that sound
02:01:747 (8) - NC should be here Yes
[Savage]
00:08:086 (6,7,3) - equal distance between these 3 objects perhaps? for a neater pattern Sure
00:13:579 (1,2,3) - Eh, just comparing the music here to 00:00:058 (1,2,3,4,5) - i'm not a big fan of you spacing out these. It just...doesn't really fit the intensity of the music. The spacing at the beginning is only so that the player isn't surprised by all the spaced streams throughout the map. I don't like surprises, it has nothing to do with intensity at that part. The triple being spaced is for the trumpet noise, something I did throughout the map
00:14:318 (6,7,9) - if you wont change, you could make this an equaliteral triangle for neatness Adjusted that a bit
00:21:818 (1) - NC should be on 00:22:241 (2) - righT? I guess
00:23:191 (6,7,8,9,10) - Same here, this doesn't really need to be spaced. I guess you can justify 00:23:719 (1,2,3) - but the stream leading into it not really. Right the music kind of amps up here so an accelerated stream would fit but I loathe accelerated streams, they're just a magnet for trouble, so I simply spaced it all the same, I think it's intense enough to fit really.
00:26:043 (3,4,5,6,7,8) - What's the difference between this and the other triplets you were spacing out in terms of the music? Trust me, I enjoy playing spaced triplets/streams/whathaveyou, but they should be justified by the music's intensity. These are mapped to guitar triples not trumpets, and they are much softer
00:29:424 (3,1) - you can afford having a larger spacing between these two, having the head of 1 be so close to the tail of 3 is a bit jarring considering the SV. I'm not the happiest with this either but it looks extremely messy if "1" overlaps with "3" in a non stacky way
00:44:635 (4,5) - could flow better, atm it feels like you're hitting 5 from behind Moved "4" to help with this
00:49:917 (1,2,3) - i like these spaced triplets because the trumpet contrasts with the rest of the section, and thus the triplets do as well. yeah was going for that at least, tried to be as consistent about this as I could
01:37:241 (1) - Buffer these sliders, as remove a reverse from each one so that the gap to the next object is 1/4 I tried this at the very beginning of the mapping and the effect was utter rubbish compared to what I was going for, this isn't perfect either but it's a biiiit closer to what I wanted. Will brainstorm this more
Overall its a nice diff, I just feel like you should make the spaced 1/4 match the intensity of the music instead of just kind of doing it whenever, which is what it feels like now. Thanks for a good mod!
Good luck!
Other reply coming soon
Oh this is coming soon as well. Please look forward to it.Ain053 wrote:
forward and back and then fooorward and back and then forward and back and then ONE STEP FORWARD