1. I felt this first song a bit off... I tried to check the offset, but because I did not played many days ago, I'm not sure if it is because wrong offset or just because it is 142 bpm.
2. 00:00:471 (1,2,3) - Not perfectly aligned? xD Very nazi, i know.
3. 00:08:605 (3) - well... removing this could be better imo, because there is not any sound here for support this note, and this jump feels out of place at play. Also, this sections feels like in 00:01:844 - , and you did not used a note there.
4. 00:39:556 (1,2) - Unique in all diff?? (01:38:489 (4,5,1,2) - is not exactly equal )
5. you are skipping some nice claps in 00:42:091 - , 00:43:781 - and 00:45:471 - , my idea for this is maybe adding a circle and stacking:
   
   SPOILER

   
   yeah, I know there are very low possibilities you apply this ^^U
6. 01:41:246 - 01:42:936 - 01:44:626 - Similar here
7. 02:39:133 (1) - waaaa, idk, this is very fast but only because what?, Playing this was a surprise. Personally, I found this weird.
8. 03:23:288 (6) - unique use in this song?.

1. 04:13:844 (3) - you can align those nodes better, I like them, don't be lazy please >.< (not only here, of course not all look bad, but some of they could improve yet :3)
2. 05:27:256 (3,3) - are they unstacked for design or for accident?
3. 07:08:197 (1,2,3,4) - this spacing feels weird in playing, I feel a same spacing more comfortable:
   
   SPOILER

   

1. 08:18:104 (3) - here you used to follow the guitar, but then you did nothing in 08:18:976 - , And after this, you used to follow only the voice. This feels weird because guitar deserved a more complex rhythm, but following voice is nice too. I wanna suggest something like this in order of avoid the guitar:
   
2. 10:37:116 (1) - oopppssss....
   
   oooopppssss....

   

ErunamoJAZZ wrote:

hi Finally weekend ~_~ starting to experience this myself now that i am working ;w;

1. I felt this first song a bit off... I tried to check the offset, but because I did not played many days ago, I'm not sure if it is because wrong offset or just because it is 142 bpm. ya, many people said it. i'll recheck timing.
2. 00:00:471 (1,2,3) - Not perfectly aligned? xD Very nazi, i know.
3. 00:08:605 (3) - well... removing this could be better imo, because there is not any sound here for support this note, and this jump feels out of place at play. Also, this sections feels like in 00:01:844 - , and you did not used a note there. there is a note there, it's like a guitar thign that didnt happen earlier.
4. 00:39:556 (1,2) - Unique in all diff?? (01:38:489 (4,5,1,2) - is not exactly equal ) well, they are the same structure of circles stacked on slider end. not a problem imo.
5. you are skipping some nice claps in 00:42:091 - , 00:43:781 - and 00:45:471 - , my idea for this is maybe adding a circle and stacking:
   
   SPOILER

   
   yeah, I know there are very low possibilities you apply this ^^U
6. 01:41:246 - 01:42:936 - 01:44:626 - Similar here goal here is basically, undermap a lot for more contrast. i can't do that if i put circles on every 1/2 tick.
7. 02:39:133 (1) - waaaa, idk, this is very fast but only because what?, Playing this was a surprise. Personally, I found this weird. damn... everyone hates it.. guess i nerf =(
8. 03:23:288 (6) - unique use in this song?. since the vocals hit the highest pitch, i made it more intense with a kickslider + high spacing.
   and that doesn''t happen in other choruses, so it has to be unique.

1. 04:13:844 (3) - you can align those nodes better, I like them, don't be lazy please >.< (not only here, of course not all look bad, but some of they could improve yet :3) they are perfect
2. 05:27:256 (3,3) - are they unstacked for design or for accident?
3. 07:08:197 (1,2,3,4) - this spacing feels weird in playing, I feel a same spacing more comfortable: adjusted, i want the decreasing thiing cuz the drums geet lower but i made it less weird
   
   SPOILER

   

1. 08:18:104 (3) - here you used to follow the guitar, but then you did nothing in 08:18:976 - , And after this, you used to follow only the voice. This feels weird because guitar deserved a more complex rhythm, but following voice is nice too. I wanna suggest something like this in order of avoid the guitar: yea, i need to remap intro. it is terrible
   
2. 10:37:116 (1) - oopppssss....
   
   oooopppssss....

   

cute songs... is the first song the famous/infamous harumachi? o.o?

Mir wrote:

more harumachi clover

OneDiff
05:04:668 (1) - What are these random really ugly and really out of place beziers lol they're not even consistent. I'm lazy to point all of them out but there are several. 05:24:433 (1) - like literally what the fuck is 06:26:550 (4) - lol. 07:23:021 (1) - isn't bezier so it's clearly not consistent with the EE sound I just really want a reason for these.

- 02:50:436 (4,1) - Bend seems a bit weird considering emphasis is being put on 4 but the song is emphasizing 1.
- 05:32:903 (4) - NC?
- 05:38:550 (3) - 05:44:197 (3) - These seem like they should have the NC not the 1 before it. disagree these are different phrases so i nc'd
- 06:08:197 (6) - NCCCC
- 09:28:046 (4) - This looks so randomly placed, can you put it like https://i.imgur.com/RSvzPgY.png or something?
- 10:03:453 (2,3) - 10:04:238 (7) - Kicks here would fit I think with how this part sounds? hmm i like triples better. i only used kicks to avoid having really long streams lol
- 10:06:069 (1) - Remove clap?
- 10:38:162 (3) - NC here seems appropriate.

Yea just those beziers make no sense at all and an explanation on those would be nice. Also what about color-haxing the different songs? Just an idea. Remap your intro I guess and call me back for recheck? (assuming you didn't already)

Stefan wrote:

curse

1. some of your break spots need fixing
2. 01:20:535 (2,3,4,5,6,7) - can you make this a proper equilateral thanks
3. 01:41:450 (4,5) - 01:43:140 (4,5) - 01:44:830 (4,5) - 01:46:520 (4,5) - honestly you could Ctrl + G these for a similar effect to the first pre-chorus; feels odd to make the second pre-chorus more of a reading challenge
4. 01:48:211 (5,6) - 01:49:902 (5,6) - really don't get why you would want to establish this pre-chorus as more technically challenging when all your other patterning for this song doesn't do anything of the sort
5. 01:54:126 (2,3) - should have more spacing tbh
6. 02:55:816 (4,5) - should be Ctrl + G to match the other patterns, hoyl
7. 02:59:196 (4,5,6,7) - betrays the patterning that you wanted to go for with 02:54:126 (3,4) - 02:57:506 (4,5) -
8. 03:25:183 (1) - finish
9. 04:26:021 (3,4,5) - 05:56:374 (3,4,5) - should have equal spacing on all notes imo, it'd look nicer with the pattern you're trying to go for here
10. 05:19:668 (3,1) - stack slider end on the (3) lol
11. 06:45:786 (3,4,5,1) - would look neater if you made it into a square tbh. copy 06:45:786 (3,4) - and rotate by 90 degrees on its selection centre, then just move 06:46:138 (6,1) - to those coordinates
    
    SPOILER

    
12. 07:25:844 (3,3) - shouldn't the orientation of these sliders be in the same general direction? feels really off to change the pattern like this this late into the song
13. 07:34:844 (2,3,4,5,6) - centre the (6) in the square hoyl
14. 08:40:953 (1,2,3,4) - these kicks all have equal emphasis on them so it feels pretty bad for 3->4 to be so weak in comparison to the other 3. same with 08:45:837 (3,4) - to some extent
15. 08:44:441 (2) - what is this aesthetic here LOL you're better off stacking this with 08:43:918 (2) -
16. 08:43:744 (1,2,3,1,2,3) - ^speaking of which, make this into a better square shape, similar to what i suggested at 06:45:786 (3,4,5,1) -
17. 08:47:930 (3,4) - should decrease the spacing here similar to what 08:48:802 (6,7) - is
18. 09:12:348 (7) - actually if you listen closely, there's no sound on the blue tick 09:12:435 - . there is a sound on 09:12:610 - though, so a rhythm like this would be more fitting:
    
    SPOILER

    
19. 09:40:168 - umm hello why did you skip the drum here
20. 11:00:488 (1) - i get that it's a slow section but there's still a finish here :/
21. 09:58:395 (5,1) - 11:22:116 (1,2) - swap NCs here lol
22. 09:08:162 (3) - 09:19:325 (4) - 10:09:558 (2) - 10:10:953 (5) - 11:29:092 (2) - 11:31:185 (3) - shouldn't these be NCed?

Doormat wrote:

why

[OneDiff]

1. some of your break spots need fixing
2. 01:20:535 (2,3,4,5,6,7) - can you make this a proper equilateral thanks
3. 01:41:450 (4,5) - 01:43:140 (4,5) - 01:44:830 (4,5) - 01:46:520 (4,5) - honestly you could Ctrl + G these for a similar effect to the first pre-chorus; feels odd to make the second pre-chorus more of a reading challenge tbh i have not seen anyone have issues with this, since it's the same rhythm they can recognize that and play it properly. also the followpoints look kinda bad xd
4. 01:48:211 (5,6) - 01:49:902 (5,6) - really don't get why you would want to establish this pre-chorus as more technically challenging when all your other patterning for this song doesn't do anything of the sort same as above.. i don't think is is particularly hard cuz the rhythm was already introduced lol. and i do this in the one at 02:57:010 - too
5. 01:54:126 (2,3) - should have more spacing tbh since it's not a vocal, i wanted to make a really clear pattern based separation to the part with the vocal - 01:54:549 (1,2,3,4,5) - . spacing wasn't that important here.
6. 02:55:816 (4,5) - should be Ctrl + G to match the other patterns, hoyl
7. 02:59:196 (4,5,6,7) - betrays the patterning that you wanted to go for with 02:54:126 (3,4) - 02:57:506 (4,5) - yea cuz theres drums there >.> so i changed the pattern cuz the song was different
8. 03:25:183 (1) - finish
9. 04:26:021 (3,4,5) - 05:56:374 (3,4,5) - should have equal spacing on all notes imo, it'd look nicer with the pattern you're trying to go for here
10. 05:19:668 (3,1) - stack slider end on the (3) lol
11. 06:45:786 (3,4,5,1) - would look neater if you made it into a square tbh. copy 06:45:786 (3,4) - and rotate by 90 degrees on its selection centre, then just move 06:46:138 (6,1) - to those coordinates
    
    SPOILER

    
12. 07:25:844 (3,3) - shouldn't the orientation of these sliders be in the same general direction? feels really off to change the pattern like this this late into the song
13. 07:34:844 (2,3,4,5,6) - centre the (6) in the square hoyl
14. 08:40:953 (1,2,3,4) - these kicks all have equal emphasis on them so it feels pretty bad for 3->4 to be so weak in comparison to the other 3. same with 08:45:837 (3,4) - to some extent
15. 08:44:441 (2) - what is this aesthetic here LOL you're better off stacking this with 08:43:918 (2) -
16. 08:43:744 (1,2,3,1,2,3) - ^speaking of which, make this into a better square shape, similar to what i suggested at 06:45:786 (3,4,5,1) -
17. 08:47:930 (3,4) - should decrease the spacing here similar to what 08:48:802 (6,7) - is
18. 09:12:348 (7) - actually if you listen closely, there's no sound on the blue tick 09:12:435 - . there is a sound on 09:12:610 - though, so a rhythm like this would be more fitting:
    
    SPOILER

    
19. 09:40:168 - umm hello why did you skip the drum here uhh cuz its super quiet imo the other 3 are much louder
20. 11:00:488 (1) - i get that it's a slow section but there's still a finish here :/
21. 09:58:395 (5,1) - 11:22:116 (1,2) - swap NCs here lol 2nd one is correct, theres a vocal there. matches with other stuff like 10:03:104 (8,1) -
22. 09:08:162 (3) - 09:19:325 (4) - 10:09:558 (2) - 10:10:953 (5) - 11:29:092 (2) - 11:31:185 (3) - shouldn't these be NCed? spent 20 minutes fixing the color haxing after applying this.. and made all ncs consistent cuz i cant nc properly lol

do what you need to do i guess