No comment = Fixed, thank you very much!AlphaDude95 wrote:
hi, sorry i´m super late
m4m q: t/601442
link to my map: https://osu.ppy.sh/s/602930
some minor issues i found with the top diffs:
HARD
00:07:204 (3,1) - blanket off Understand that this isn't supposed to be a perfect blanket: it's supposed to go over the side with the slider leading into it. I did make a slight adjustment though.
00:08:793 (1,2,3) - ^
00:10:381 (1,2,3) - why do you change spacing so suddenly? It didn't seem that drastic to me, but I made a change.
00:16:028 (1) - may make sense if the timing changes, but not here imo I don't really see a problem; it emphasizes the vocals.
00:26:881 - blanket´s off
00:28:028 (2) - same as before :/
00:29:087 (2,4) - this overlap should be 1/2 exactly
00:42:851 (1,3) - overlap´s off
00:45:322 (4,1) - it looks cleaner to draw the slider along the approach circle
00:53:969 - here you use minimal spacing for the 1/1 then afterward you use larger ds, i´d stick to one way I brought (4) a bit closer to (5),
but the spacing seemed fine to me otherwise.
00:55:381 - there´s a downbeat here, make this clickable There's a pick-up for the vocals, but nothing else. I can either map to the vocals or map to the instruments. I decided to map to the instruments to this difficulty.
01:03:145 (2,3) - stack´s a tiny bit off Huh, how did that happen?
01:28:910 (2) - 1/2 overlap with 01:30:145 (3)
01:56:263 (1,2,3) - blanket better
01:58:733 (4,1) - whoa, this gap is really big compared to pretty much the rest of the map
02:10:021 (4,1) - ^ This one's actually not that far. It's the same distance as the very first one.
02:58:028 (4,5,6) - i can pretty much see without checking the triangle´s not equilateral (as i assume it was meant to be)
03:09:498 (1,2) - this could be blanketed
03:17:263 (3,4) - ^
03:17:792 (4,1) - overlap´s a tiny bit off Didn't seem off to me.
INSANE
00:03:146 (1) - overlap with 00:01:910 (1) ´s tail (if you don´t mind moving the whole pattern) Achieved by moving the much shorter and disconnected stream pattern, although the distance between the objects was great enough that I don't think it was worth the effort.
00:08:263 (3,4,5) - make these equilateral? I actually wanted to use spacing to highlight the first two beats over the third. I modified it to make that a bit clearer.
00:10:204 (5) - 1/2 overlap is better imo
00:17:263 (4) - overlap with 00:16:028 (1) I don't want to change the spacing.
00:20:440 - should be followed with a slider like in a previous case (plus you missed a downbeat) I'm mapping to the vocals here, though.
00:23:440 - could be created by copypasting; i can see the ds is unequal I actually came up with a different way to map this just now; it more clearly maps to the vocals.
00:26:263 (6,7) - blanket this better
00:28:028 (2,3) - make these copypasted
00:31:557 - missed downbeat
00:32:969 (1) - space this out more for a downbeat
00:34:028 (4,5,1) - make them equilateral
00:35:263 (6,7,8) - ^
00:49:204 - there´s a super loud "whoosh" sound here
00:50:263 (2,3,4) - geometrically off
00:56:263 (3,4,5) - make these equilateral
00:56:793 (1) - blanket off
01:04:381 (4) - curve the slider more I think I made a modification on my own that nullifies this. Sorry, I make minor tweaks all the time to this map: never satisfied....
01:05:263 (1,2,3,4) - off geometry
01:10:734 (4,5,6) - make these equilateral I had a better idea that involved variant spacing.
01:20:440 (2) - overlap the tail with 01:18:675 (2,3) That'd be too challenging to do without breaking the spacing.
01:23:793 (1,2) - make them copypasted
01:24:322 (2,3,1) - blanket this better I care more about flow there; blanketing would prematurely change rotations or make the slider too close.
01:33:322 (3) - this slider should be heading down I don't really see that...
01:34:910 (5,3) - overlap these
01:36:851 (2) - there´s a finish here yet you used clap
01:40:734 - the 2 following combos are unnecesarily long Combos are that long for all parts on all difficulties. I do it this way to reflect the slower nature of this part of the song.
01:44:616 (3,4,5) - make these equilateral
01:48:851 (4,1,3) - blanket better
01:51:322 (2,3,4) - lower the spacing
01:59:969 (4) - this is a clearly different tone from the vocal so you could try at least a different slider shape Enough people have complained about this for me to change the pattern. It ends with two overlapped circles now, as do all the others.
02:04:734 (1,2) - the high spacing and a new combo confused me, looks like a 1/1 spacing gap imo I shortened it slightly, but it's an extremely emphasized note.
02:11:263 (4) - split into two objects
02:14:969 (1,2,1,2,1,2) - the jumps are ok but they lack organisation
02:21:498 (1,2) - blanket´s off
02:24:851 - this beat should be clickable I hear one distinct note from the electric guitar.
02:28:734 - the comboing is weird here
03:01:557 (1,2,1) - the spacing among these should be more or less equal
03:16:557 - what is the idea behind equal vocals given different shapes? 1: It's more clear that there are sliders than if there would be if there were direct overlap. 2: the third line is most distinct, so it is straight rather than curved.
03:19:557 (1) - overlap with 03:18:675 (2) That would force it closer and with a harsher angle.
BRIGHT AND BRILLIANT
00:01:911 (1,2) - these two would be better off copypasted
00:04:735 (1,2) - the ds is too big imo
00:11:440 (5) - this hitcircle needs more spacing It's not an emphasized beat.
00:14:793 (2) - half overlap with 00:13:911 (3) ´s tail? Made my own adjustment
00:18:499 (4,5,1) - equilateral triangle here I increased the spacing instead, for emphasis.
00:21:676 (1,2) - these could be copypasted as well
00:32:440 (4) - any reason why this slider is visibly more curved? Yes, because I messed up. Fixed.
00:33:676 (4) - half overlap with 00:32:793
00:34:205 (7) - ^ with 00:34:910 (4,5,1)
00:48:852 (2) - ctrl+j and move up This is intentionally uncomfortable.
00:55:029 (6) - change into 2 circles
01:02:264 (6) - place in between 01:01:735 (3,4)
01:08:087 (1,3) - blanket this better; try to use the approach circle for help I won't blanket it, but I did increase the curvature
01:22:205 (4,6) - ^ I opted to overlap with a previous circle instead.
01:39:146 (5,1) - ^ This decreases the curvature more than I want: I don't like the way the slider looks.
01:41:440 (3,4,5) - make into an equilateral triangle
01:44:793 (4,7,8,9) - overlap
02:04:911 (2) i´d try to avoid overlapping here Seems fine to me. :/
02:22:205 (3,4) - blanket´s off
02:53:617 (4) - split into 2 notes
03:05:264 (1,2,3,4) - pretty inconsistent spacing wise
03:07:558 (3) - overlap with 03:06:499 (6)
03:08:264 (1,2) - lower the spacing maybe, the 1/4 gap isn´t obvious
03:11:617 (4,7) - blanket´s off
03:19:558 (1,2,3) - make an equilateral triangle here
Overally a nice work. Hope to see it ranked!