Yahallo >.<
Transcience
- 00:42:265 (2,3,4) - distance consistency with 00:32:673 (2,3,4) - 00:35:870 (2,3,4) - 00:37:469 (3,4,5) - 00:39:067 (2,3,4) - etc, at least between 00:42:265 (2,3) - cause I can hear the same sound.
- 00:47:993 (2,3) - doesn't it deserve more distance than 00:48:126 (3,4) - ? there isn't something relevant at 00:48:259 - to enphasize with jump.
- 00:50:391 (4,5) - 00:52:122 (2,3) - 00:53:721 (4,5) - increase the distance to 0,20x to be constant with similar patterns.
- 00:54:387 (3,4) - press Ctrl+G talking about structure, I think that slider at 00:54:520 - follows vocal in a better way, now I'm trying to understand why you did this kind of pattern and I feel that you wanna enphasize 00:54:653 - and 00:54:787 - (I don't remenber the name of the instrument orz), so if you want to keep your current 00:54:653 (5,6) - stack (well is something somilar) maybe you can change 00:54:387 (3) - into notes too.
- 01:13:969 (4,5,1) - reduce distance pls, the current sound is similar as 01:15:035 (5,6) -, why not keep consistency on ds?
- 01:33:019 (3,4) - mmm I feel that this kind of stack is better between 01:33:152 - and 01:33:286 -, is like my example on 00:54:387 (3,4) -
- 01:42:211 - following your previous and future patterns, this NC is breaking your consistency, if you are not agree, just add a new one at 01:45:408 -
- 02:12:849 - new rhyhtm starts here, don't you want to add NC here?
- 02:52:547 - is it necessary a NC only for this note?
- 02:57:875 - missing NC uwu
- NC at 02:58:674 - feels better than 02:58:941 - tbh.
- 03:05:068 (3,4) - Ctrl+G talking about structure one more time, slider first then note sounds better with the song imo.
- 03:05:601 - did u miss a NC here? it reminds me to 05:10:821 -
- 04:33:522 (3,4) - distance here intriguers me, don't you want to add more distance? specially when u have a similar pattern closer to this one: 04:33:388 (2,3) -, take a look at 04:37:785 (2,3,4,5,6,1) - as a reference.
- 04:34:055 (5,6,1) - could be more consistent visual spacing, 04:34:854 (6) - looks better in the midle,
- 04:42:847 (5) - why no slider and stacked like your previous patterns? (04:41:381 (5,1) - 04:39:250 (6,1) - 04:35:520 (2,3) - etc)
- 04:45:245 (1) - should finish at 04:45:644 - to keep consistency with 04:44:712 (1) -.
- 04:46:910 (1) - isn't at all necessary tbh, it will confuse players only.
- why 04:55:102 (2,3) - have more distance than 04:55:768 (6,1) - if at 04:55:902 - there is the highest pitch
- 05:27:871 (3) - could be an slider from the current position to 05:28:404 - imo.