Ni ma de i rather have this version of Hoshitachi ranked instead, I really hate my version and it's so messy and terrible tbh I wanted to remap but i have no innovation orz
Ultra no sense modding incoming
That's all
Ultra no sense modding incoming
[Unlimited]
- 00:32:507 (1) - Ctrl+g, put them to about x:386/y:306 , otherwise the cursor movement will be jigged, Don't forget to not let them touch other objects after you changed it, also, too close How the cursor moved for the current pattern, notice the blue line means the movement didn't go smoothly
Yeah i know it's meh, but at least it's clear enough - 00:39:594 (3) - You're ignoring the white tick, which have the drums to be in place, even it does follow the vocals perfectly, but ending up feeling that i have something missing there
- 00:56:572 (2,2) - x:400/y:129 , same problem for jigged motion, and not pretty much supporting this kind of flow separation, and adjust the pattern later on
- 01:07:122 (2,2) - ^, x:225/y:44
[Starlit Sky]
- 00:06:957 (3,2,2) - Soooo... you desired to use some kind of "slider" gimmick there, Maybe unstack it for a little bit so it can read easily, from what i could see is not pretty much people could know there's another slider there
Oh yeah, also adjust the position of 00:07:946 (1) - and 00:08:935 (4) - after you changed it - 00:12:232 (3) - Since this part is mapped the vocals mostly, what i could see if you place a slider there to let 00:12:232 - Clickable, but the stronger vocals is at 00:12:397 - , so i think you making the stronger vocals unclickable feels meh for me, I know you also make the the slider end vocal unclickable at 00:14:045 (1) - and 00:15:199 (1) - , But they feel better unlike the one i pointed out, and both slider head and slider end were have the same strength of vocals (But 3/4 and a circle is better though)
Or use the same rhythm as 00:16:682 (1,2,3,4) - - 00:19:979 (3,4) - The stack isn't supporting anything, in this case, the first vocal is sightly stronger than the second, so slider is better at there
- 00:20:968 (3) - Just my opinion though, you could move 00:20:309 (5) - and stack 00:20:968 (3) - since they're the same sound
- 00:23:111 (1) - I know that you're blanketing 00:23:441 (2) - , but i think placing like this will play more smoothly
- 00:39:594 (3) -Some problem i mentioned previous diffs
- 01:22:122 (3,2,2) - same thing i mentioned before
That's all