show more
_handholding
3,109 posts
Joined April 2014
_handholding
hi from your modding queue

Easy

  1. 00:06:957 (2,3) - ctrl +g would fit this rhythm better imo
  2. 00:18:660 (4) - because this slider is so small the red ticks kind of makes it look messy

Standard

  1. 00:03:001 (5) - not really an issue but curve this a bit for flow? http://puu.sh/p3C2e/349adc2065.jpg
  2. 00:36:957 (5,6) - why is this stack different than the rest?

Hard

  1. 00:04:649 (1) - Moving the red point to the right a tiny bit would make it look better
  2. 00:09:265 (4,1,2,3) - I would much rather have the DS increase in between (2) and (3) rather than (4) and (1). Or just keep the DS the same.
  3. 00:09:924 (3,1,2,3) - same as above
  4. 00:45:364 (4) - removing the red point and making it completely straight would be better :v http://puu.sh/p3Cx0/c3d4e2bf9f.jpg

Insane

  1. 00:01:353 (2,3) - i do feel like copy pasting these 2 sliders would look better. Because the way (3) is atm, it doesnt curve around (2) nicely
  2. 00:22:287 (1) - YOu can delete this NC imo because it comes after the SV change and is perfectly readable without the NC
  3. 00:23:111 (1) to 00:32:507 (1) - I dont get your NC patterns here. At first i thought I was getting what you were doing but then some measures were inconsistent :/
  4. 00:38:935 (1) - i like this :)
  5. 01:19:155 (2,3) - same as the beginning

Unlimited


  • I dont think 2 custom names like this is rankable
  1. 00:05:968 (7,1) - I think it looks better when you dont have a whole section of the curve obscured http://puu.sh/p3Doy/c8d5717a9c.jpg . The DS only increases by 0.1 too
  2. 00:38:935 (1,2,3,4) - This caused my some readability problems, not sure if its just me though, what do you think of NCing all of them?
  3. 01:00:199 (3) - curve it a bit more so it looks like the second half of 01:00:693 (2) flipped in a mirror. http://puu.sh/p3DHJ/8791e43440.jpg
  4. 01:05:309 (1) - delete NC? I dont any real purpose for it
  5. 01:10:336 (2,3) - This flows better imho http://puu.sh/p3Emw/5509b50584.jpg
  6. 01:15:858 (1) - same as 01:05:309 (1)
  7. 01:26:243 (2,3,4,5,1) - reminds me of miraizu xdd

Starlight sky

  1. 00:46:847 (1,1) - avoid perfectly stacking to make it more readable like you did in similar patterns throught the mapset
hope this mod was useful, GL!
Lasse
osu! Alumni
3,648 posts
Joined June 2011
Topic Starter
Lasse

Kisses wrote:

hi from your modding queue

Easy

  1. 00:06:957 (2,3) - ctrl +g would fit this rhythm better imo both work fine to I'll keep it
  2. 00:18:660 (4) - because this slider is so small the red ticks kind of makes it look messy it's cute :c

Standard

  1. 00:03:001 (5) - not really an issue but curve this a bit for flow? http://puu.sh/p3C2e/349adc2065.jpg physically impossible for me to do this because the movement coming from 5 kills my concept of visuals then
  2. 00:36:957 (5,6) - why is this stack different than the rest? cause it was autostacked, fixed

Hard

  1. 00:04:649 (1) - Moving the red point to the right a tiny bit would make it look better tried
  2. 00:09:265 (4,1,2,3) - I would much rather have the DS increase in between (2) and (3) rather than (4) and (1). Or just keep the DS the same. such a nice pattern :\ works fine
  3. 00:09:924 (3,1,2,3) - same as above
  4. 00:45:364 (4) - removing the red point and making it completely straight would be better :v http://puu.sh/p3Cx0/c3d4e2bf9f.jpg current works better with 00:44:210 (1) - even if it's not visible during gameplay

Insane

  1. 00:01:353 (2,3) - i do feel like copy pasting these 2 sliders would look better. Because the way (3) is atm, it doesnt curve around (2) nicely idk what happened here lol. remade this
  2. 00:22:287 (1) - YOu can delete this NC imo because it comes after the SV change and is perfectly readable without the NC ruins my color concept. the slider for the first sound is red + higher sv and then it changes back to the "calmer" part with orange/blue combo. removing nc would make either everything red which doesnt fit or not allow me to make that slider red
  3. 00:23:111 (1) to 00:32:507 (1) - I dont get your NC patterns here. At first i thought I was getting what you were doing but then some measures were inconsistent :/ should be better now. mostly focuses on downbeats/emphasized red tick before every second downbeat + triples before those cause it looks better and some for pattern/vocal
  4. 00:38:935 (1) - i like this :)
  5. 01:19:155 (2,3) - same as the beginning fixed

Unlimited


  • I dont think 2 custom names like this is rankable it's not custom, it's from the game the song is from and indicates difficulty (extra ) well enough I suppose, pretty much like using INFINITE or Lunatic
  1. 00:05:968 (7,1) - I think it looks better when you dont have a whole section of the curve obscured http://puu.sh/p3Doy/c8d5717a9c.jpg . The DS only increases by 0.1 too current looks cuter :c
  2. 00:38:935 (1,2,3,4) - This caused my some readability problems, not sure if its just me though, what do you think of NCing all of them? would just mess up hp drain and be way too spammy
  3. 01:00:199 (3) - curve it a bit more so it looks like the second half of 01:00:693 (2) flipped in a mirror. http://puu.sh/p3DHJ/8791e43440.jpg It was supposed to, but seems like it was really off, fixed lol
  4. 01:05:309 (1) - delete NC? I dont any real purpose for it yheaj
  5. 01:10:336 (2,3) - This flows better imho http://puu.sh/p3Emw/5509b50584.jpg but it looks worse lol. current plays fine and you dont have to fully follow the slider anyways
  6. 01:15:858 (1) - same as 01:05:309 (1)
  7. 01:26:243 (2,3,4,5,1) - reminds me of miraizu xdd

Starlight sky


  • starLIT (starlight sky sounds fucking awful xd)
  1. 00:46:847 (1,1) - avoid perfectly stacking to make it more readable like you did in similar patterns throught the mapset but that is the whole purpose of this :v
hope this mod was useful, GL!
thanks for modding!
_handholding
3,109 posts
Joined April 2014
_handholding

Lasse wrote:

(starlight sky sounds fucking awful xd)
i misread xd
Len
Beatmap Nominator
2,831 posts
Joined June 2012
Len
from q


Hard:
  1. 00:03:166 (4,5) - stacking is better
  2. 00:06:627 (2,3,1,2,1,2) - what about avoiding that overlap? looks so hard
  3. 00:18:166 (2,3) - , 00:36:133 (4,5) - , 00:38:770 (3,4) - 00:41:572 (4) - and etc. same as above
  4. 00:35:638 (2) - stack on 3 ?
  5. in kiai, distance between objects are mostly bad so randomly

Insane:
  1. pls no ctrl c v gg

i cant mod those sliders gg
Lasse
osu! Alumni
3,648 posts
Joined June 2011
Topic Starter
Lasse

Len wrote:

from q


Hard:
  1. 00:03:166 (4,5) - stacking is better stacked, but manually :v
  2. 00:06:627 (2,3,1,2,1,2) - what about avoiding that overlap? looks so hard looks like http://i.imgur.com/8dJqjH0.jpg during gameplay, that should be fine for a hard diff
  3. 00:18:166 (2,3) - , 00:36:133 (4,5) - , 00:38:770 (3,4) - 00:41:572 (4) - and etc. same as above
    i like manual stacks
  4. 00:35:638 (2) - stack on 3 ? I'd rather have a jump on the clap
  5. in kiai, distance between objects are mostly bad so randomly made it a bit more consistent, it still follows a general concept emphasizing mostly claps and strong vocals while not making it too hard.

Insane:
  1. pls no ctrl c v gg
    using only horizontal/vertical sliders with the vertical ones all having the same movement for all parts except the chorus is the whole concept of this diff : (

i cant mod those sliders gg gg
thanks!
Momochikun
1,954 posts
Joined October 2012
Momochikun
yuikoyuiko <3

start the song on the same time ? well that's kinda inconsistent when enh start 1/1 later with the higher diffs,
you can try adding a note in easy, 1/2 in normal and a kick slider on hard to keep them on the same pace.

[Standard]
00:12:561 (3,4) - pretty off rhythm here, by dragging 00:13:221 (4) - 1/2 earlier you can make it play smoother as it's following the vocal
00:39:759 (6) - missing clap
00:49:320 - a note here representing the drum wouldn't be so bad imo. it could build the feel before the kiai
00:57:891 (2,3,5) - idk about this, 00:57:891 (2) - i would make this note and 1/1 slider usually. do you hate smth like that ? well usually 1/1 slider do represents vocal better than a slidertail, that's pretty weird to play imo


[Hard]
00:04:649 (1) - you might want to move this a bit downward since it's hitting the hp drain box right now, you need to move the entire section 00:03:990 (2,3,1,2,3,4) - to keep the pattern neat likely
00:16:682 (1) - the transition isn't really good there, by ctrl g-ing this one you could make the flow more smooth and later blanketing the note (2) so it would be a perfect down flow to (3). it plays reall good http://osu.ppy.sh/ss/5239905
00:38:770 (3,4) - err, this play absurd considered that you didn't space the other section 00:34:320 (5,6) - 00:39:594 (5,6) - like that, i'd rather make them consistent
00:39:759 (6) - missing clap ? clearly can hear the snare drum there
01:01:188 (4) - try to make jump from (4) to (1) instead of from (3) to (4) ? it's giving the downbeat pressure-thingy
01:17:177 (1) - tbh due this shape i'd expect a note under the slider instead of above it.. lol
01:12:397 (3,4,5,6) - make them on the same spacing ? it could represent the vocals better imo

[Insane]
try ar 8,5 ~ 8,8 instead ? you know.. 7,5 - 8,5 - 9,2 seems a more balanced spread
00:00:529 (1) - tbh i think stream or 2 1/4 slider is better here ._. it's insane diff dude
00:03:990 (2) - pretty weird transition after the slider, how about ctrl g ? it could make a cool flow into (3)
00:24:924 (1,2,1,2,1) - meh i can't read 00:25:583 (1) - due to the stack behind the note and it's cover the slidertail. honestly this is really heard to read, try manually stack them ? smth like http://osu.ppy.sh/ss/5239931 would really help readibility here
00:30:364 (2,3,4,5) - i expect more movement here instead of stacking, since you did space them out on the similiar section before, like 00:27:232 (1,2,3,4,5,1) - etc.
00:32:177 (1) - change into 1/4 slider to represent the instrument ? may be fun to play
00:56:078 (1,2,1) - just my random thoughts, but dont you think smth like http://osu.ppy.sh/ss/5239938 do play smoothier by their flowy circular stuffs ? and yeah i recommending that since it plays similiar like 00:58:715 (1,2,1) -
01:13:056 (3) - missing clap
00:39:759 (6) - ^ probably . or not ? if you did use hs copier

[Unlimited]
00:19:814 (2,3,4,5) - try create a pattern here ? something like star looks good before changing phase err
00:33:166 (2) - it looks like player would click this earlier due to the dense rhythm before, i'd recommend adding note here 00:33:001 -
00:40:254 (1,2) - hard to read dude, really you need to ask some testplayers. the colorhax even make this harder to read since they were on similiar color and the sv is soooo low
00:42:891 (1,2,3) - i'd make this a little bit visible by moving downward
00:53:111 (1,2,3,4,1) - kinda a difficulty spike if you asked me, since Insane diff is particularly easier than most Insane does.


good luck !
Lasse
osu! Alumni
3,648 posts
Joined June 2011
Topic Starter
Lasse

Momochikun wrote:

yuikoyuiko <3

start the song on the same time ? well that's kinda inconsistent when enh start 1/1 later with the higher diffs,
you can try adding a note in easy, 1/2 in normal and a kick slider on hard to keep them on the same pace. added a repeatslider on hard for now. I don't really want to map that in e/n cause it feels way too "throwing players into the song" which I don'T really see as too friendly for beginners, it's just one object anyways

[Standard]
00:12:561 (3,4) - pretty off rhythm here, by dragging 00:13:221 (4) - 1/2 earlier you can make it play smoother as it's following the vocal focusing on drums+guitar herfe works better to get a fitting rhythm with less density and okay polarity
00:39:759 (6) - missing clap right, added for all lower diffs. I mapped Unlimited first and a 3/4 vocal slider goes over it there so that explains
00:49:320 - a note here representing the drum wouldn't be so bad imo. it could build the feel before the kiai would ever have to space, which doesnt fit difficulty curve of this or stack whick kills emphasis for the cymbal :/
00:57:891 (2,3,5) - idk about this, 00:57:891 (2) - i would make this note and 1/1 slider usually. do you hate smth like that ? well usually 1/1 slider do represents vocal better than a slidertail, that's pretty weird to play imo but that ignores the vocal way harder since the slider ends on drums and goes over a new syllable, not what I like to do :d


[Hard]
00:04:649 (1) - you might want to move this a bit downward since it's hitting the hp drain box right now, you need to move the entire section 00:03:990 (2,3,1,2,3,4) - to keep the pattern neat likely I'll take "hitting hpbar slightly" here since the pattern is so nice and it would need to restructure so much and it would probably end up worse
00:16:682 (1) - the transition isn't really good there, by ctrl g-ing this one you could make the flow more smooth and later blanketing the note (2) so it would be a perfect down flow to (3). it plays reall good http://osu.ppy.sh/ss/5239905 circle kinda needs to be stacked to be consistent with other non-kick hits in this section and movement seems totally fine to me
00:38:770 (3,4) - err, this play absurd considered that you didn't space the other section 00:34:320 (5,6) - 00:39:594 (5,6) - like that, i'd rather make them consistent looool no idea what happened here, it's supposed to be stacked, fixed
00:39:759 (6) - missing clap ? clearly can hear the snare drum there
01:01:188 (4) - try to make jump from (4) to (1) instead of from (3) to (4) ? it's giving the downbeat pressure-thingy prefer emphasizing the clap
01:17:177 (1) - tbh due this shape i'd expect a note under the slider instead of above it.. lol lol I get what you mean but it's totally fine
01:12:397 (3,4,5,6) - make them on the same spacing ? it could represent the vocals better imo think small jumps for new phrases works better

[Insane]
try ar 8,5 ~ 8,8 instead ? you know.. 7,5 - 8,5 - 9,2 seems a more balanced spread increased hard ar a bit instead. insane spams so many overlaps etc that it works much better with ar9 for reading
00:00:529 (1) - tbh i think stream or 2 1/4 slider is better here ._. it's insane diff dude I get what you mean, but it's the first object of the map and it's a pretty easy insane overall so I'll let people get more used to the song's bpm/rhythm
00:03:990 (2) - pretty weird transition after the slider, how about ctrl g ? it could make a cool flow into (3) all vertical slider sections have either only downwards or only upwards movement on those sliders, so I won't break it here
00:24:924 (1,2,1,2,1) - meh i can't read 00:25:583 (1) - due to the stack behind the note and it's cover the slidertail. honestly this is really heard to read, try manually stack them ? smth like http://osu.ppy.sh/ss/5239931 would really help readibility here might consider this, but it's one of my favorite patterns in the whole diff and it looks great
00:30:364 (2,3,4,5) - i expect more movement here instead of stacking, since you did space them out on the similiar section before, like 00:27:232 (1,2,3,4,5,1) - etc. omg I always hate on those random-ass stacks people do and now I do it myself gg. spaced this out
00:32:177 (1) - change into 1/4 slider to represent the instrument ? may be fun to play too weak imo, didn't map this on any diff
00:56:078 (1,2,1) - just my random thoughts, but dont you think smth like http://osu.ppy.sh/ss/5239938 do play smoothier by their flowy circular stuffs ? and yeah i recommending that since it plays similiar like 00:58:715 (1,2,1) - doesnt work as well with the movement from 00:56:078 (1) - if people play the slider properly and gives less emphasis for snare
01:13:056 (3) - missing clap fixed for all diffs
00:39:759 (6) - ^ probably . or not ? if you did use hs copier vocal slider goes over the clap on all higher diffs here


[Unlimited]
00:19:814 (2,3,4,5) - try create a pattern here ? something like star looks good before changing phase err breaks my vocal/drum stack/spacing concept
00:33:166 (2) - it looks like player would click this earlier due to the dense rhythm before, i'd recommend adding note here 00:33:001 - prefer low density and it makes a great transition into this part. even if clicked early it will be 300 due to slider anyways and people should be able to read this
00:40:254 (1,2) - hard to read dude, really you need to ask some testplayers. the colorhax even make this harder to read since they were on similiar color and the sv is soooo low testplays seemed okay so far, but I increased sv for this combo a little to make it more visible
00:42:891 (1,2,3) - i'd make this a little bit visible by moving downward seemed fine for the people that testplayed so far and it looks mucch better that way
00:53:111 (1,2,3,4,1) - kinda a difficulty spike if you asked me, since Insane diff is particularly easier than most Insane does. gap seems fine to me, insane also had a jump sequence and some 1/4 here, just less spaced etc.


good luck !
thanks for modding!
Gloria Guard
2,277 posts
Joined May 2011
Gloria Guard
Hello From your m4m queue :3/


[General]

Looks fine, I guess :P


[Easy]

■ 00:35:803 (1) The slider end point add finish sound here.
■ 00:08:770 (1) Hmm, I think the slider shape a little low quality. I suggestion fourth point to move x:352 y:120 is better slider shape imo.
■ 00:21:627 (4) I think this one note rhythm a little empty, I recommend this rhythm
SPOILER
■ 00:47:836 (4) I suddenly this note rhythm. it's not sure rhthm point here.. I think you made 1/2 slider rhythm here is better imo.
SPOILER
■ 00:50:638 (4) The same suggestion this note rhythm to change 1/2 slider :3
■ 00:58:715 (3) Can you try this slider curve flow?
■ 01:20:474 (4) This is slider a little low quality it.. I hope to change this slider shape.
SPOILER


[Standard]

I recommend to change this diff name is Normal <

■ 00:26:737 (6,7) You are check this slider head is stack note.
■ 00:28:715 (4,5) ^
■ 01:04:485 (4,5) I think the slider head point is stack a little awkward imo.
■ 01:15:034 (4,5) ^


[Hard]

You consider this diff slider patterns spacing is consistency

■ 00:13:386 (4) Hmm I hope to this slider symmetry is better
■ 00:22:946 (3,4,1) This distance will be you intended? I recommend this spacing is consistency..
■ 00:30:364 (2) These notes will not stack at the end of the slider.
■ 00:30:858 (3,4,1) I recommend this patterns spacing is consistency.
■ 00:33:660 (4) This is slider fourth point to move x:392 y:308 is better
■ 00:41:572 (4) The same check this note stack issue 00:30:364 (2) :p
■ 00:46:023 (2,3) You are check this patterns stack


[Insane]

■ 00:01:682 (3) The slider is ctrl+g is better flow imo.
■ 00:02:507 (2) This is note jump a little too long. I think the move this note x:368 y:72 is better flow imo
■ 00:03:990 (2) You are try this slider ctrl+g to fun play it
■ 00:04:649 (1) The same suggestion this slider flow ctrl+g :P
■ 00:11:243 (4) This note clap is remove please. I think this clap sound a little awkward.
■ 00:30:693 (3,4,5) You make this note spacing is consistency please.
■ 01:17:177 (1) I think the slider flow ctrl+g is better it.


[Unlimited]

■ 00:11:243 (3) Remove this note clap sound.
■ 00:42:323 (1,1,1,2,3) I don't understand this overlap slider patterns. I play to overlap slider a lot of confusing.so, You should be to change this slider overlap patterns. I recommend to the other patterns this sliders.



I think the last diff is good imo. Good Luck this map ranking :3/
Lasse
osu! Alumni
3,648 posts
Joined June 2011
Topic Starter
Lasse

Gloria Guard wrote:

Hello From your m4m queue :3/


[General]

Looks fine, I guess :P


[Easy]

■ 00:35:803 (1) The slider end point add finish sound here. doesnt fit imo
■ 00:08:770 (1) Hmm, I think the slider shape a little low quality. I suggestion fourth point to move x:352 y:120 is better slider shape imo. changed shape a bit
■ 00:21:627 (4) I think this one note rhythm a little empty, I recommend this rhythm im not mapping kicksliders on easy diffs
SPOILER
■ 00:47:836 (4) I suddenly this note rhythm. it's not sure rhthm point here.. I think you made 1/2 slider rhythm here is better imo.
SPOILER
■ 00:50:638 (4) The same suggestion this note rhythm to change 1/2 slider :3
3 kicksliders for the whole map would be weird
■ 00:58:715 (3) Can you try this slider curve flow? stright looks and plays nice here
■ 01:20:474 (4) This is slider a little low quality it.. I hope to change this slider shape. it's a cute slider : (
SPOILER


[Standard]

I recommend to change this diff name is Normal < standard is understandable and follows the naming of the difficulties of the rhythm game this song is from

■ 00:26:737 (6,7) You are check this slider head is stack note.
■ 00:28:715 (4,5) ^
■ 01:04:485 (4,5) I think the slider head point is stack a little awkward imo.
■ 01:15:034 (4,5) ^
using the same manual stacking for all of those


[Hard]

You consider this diff slider patterns spacing is consistency

■ 00:13:386 (4) Hmm I hope to this slider symmetry is better fine
■ 00:22:946 (3,4,1) This distance will be you intended? I recommend this spacing is consistency.. putting jumps on all of those
■ 00:30:364 (2) These notes will not stack at the end of the slider. fixed manual stack
■ 00:30:858 (3,4,1) I recommend this patterns spacing is consistency. would actually be inconsistent with the other jumps
■ 00:33:660 (4) This is slider fourth point to move x:392 y:308 is better moved a bit
■ 00:41:572 (4) The same check this note stack issue 00:30:364 (2) :p
■ 00:46:023 (2,3) You are check this patterns stack ^manual stacks


[Insane]

■ 00:01:682 (3) The slider is ctrl+g is better flow imo. kills the whole concept of thise part, with only upwards movement on sliders
■ 00:02:507 (2) This is note jump a little too long. I think the move this note x:368 y:72 is better flow imo fine with leniency
■ 00:03:990 (2) You are try this slider ctrl+g to fun play it same as first
■ 00:04:649 (1) The same suggestion this slider flow ctrl+g :P ^
■ 00:11:243 (4) This note clap is remove please. I think this clap sound a little awkward. but it fits the music
■ 00:30:693 (3,4,5) You make this note spacing is consistency please. same ds doesn't fit here
■ 01:17:177 (1) I think the slider flow ctrl+g is better it. like others


[Unlimited]

■ 00:11:243 (3) Remove this note clap sound. ^
■ 00:42:323 (1,1,1,2,3) I don't understand this overlap slider patterns. I play to overlap slider a lot of confusing.so, You should be to change this slider overlap patterns. I recommend to the other patterns this sliders. totally fine to read



I think the last diff is good imo. Good Luck this map ranking :3/
well, it's not the map I linked in my last post but whatever this needs mods too
thanks
[ owo]
[ owo]
My bad mod4mod mod

Overall: I couldn't find anything blatantly wrong with it (as expected), so below are just my personal quibbles.

Easy
00:08:770 (1) - This shape just doesn't fit here imo. More like https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/5286795 maybe
00:33:990 (3,4) - Sorta icky looking. It will look sorta better with these coordinates: red anchor (302, 40) 2nd white anchor (335, 20) last white anchor (374, 29)
00:40:419 (1,2,3,4) - Looks better like this imo: https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/5286821
00:47:836 (4) - I think this belongs on 00:48:001 instead
00:48:990 (2) - Bad blanket- try: 1st white anchor (462, 318) 1st red anchor (425,274)

Normal
00:03:001 (5) - Looks better imo with a red anchor in the middle and bent
00:05:803 (5) - Looks a bit weird to me, maybe give it bend or a red anchor?
00:13:221 (4,5) - In order to click important beats, I suggest something more like: https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/5286759
00:15:858 (4,5) - Same rhythm suggestion

Hard
00:53:605 (1,2,3) - Judging by the music, I'm not sure why this isn't just 4 hitcircles (also, 90 degree just doesn't flow well to me)
01:03:990 (1,3) - Could be better blanket
01:04:649 (3) - Looks awk to me cause whenever I see something like this slider tail, I expect something right next to it.

Insane
00:21:627 (2,3,4,5,1) - I honestly wish this had more spacing- feels a bit weird to me as it is (more like 00:54:265 (1,2,3,4,1) maybe)
00:37:122 (4) - Small thing... make this upside down so 00:37:122 (4,5) are like mirror opposites maybe?
01:09:759 (2) - I feel like it would flow better if this were placed on 01:09:100 (7) or somewhere to the right
01:15:693 (1,2,3,4,1) - Unsatisfying :(

Unlimited
00:31:023 (1) - This in particular might play better if shortened and added a hitcircle at its tail at 00:31:353.
00:32:012 (6,7,8) - Same problem as Starlit Sky for this timestamp, except its harder to correct here imo
00:54:265 (1,2,3,4,1) - I particularly don't like the curve of this ( 00:54:430 (3,4,1) is too straight, but it might be your stylistic choice)
I'm thinking something more like: https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/5286592
01:13:056 (3,1) - This particular slider shape doesn't look that good to me copy pasted. My idea: https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/5286625
01:16:023 (1) - I think the slider tail is pointed the wrong way, looks better and flows better pointed down instead imo https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/5286630
01:26:243 (2,3,4,5,1) - I see that you did slider to stream with 01:25:748 (1) slider, but it just plays off to me (cause I'm bad lel)

Starlit Sky
00:05:968 (7) - More bend maybe?
00:32:012 (6,7,8) - I think that here, you want to map the drums? (as suggested by hitsounding) but by my inspection, the drums don't go into 1/4 rhythm and are only 1/2, so your mapped portion doesn't quite fit.
Anyway, you can easily fix this by following the synth in the background instead, which is 1/4. Try making 00:32:177 (7) a 1/4 kickslider instead. Or you could just make it stream. (easier to fix here than in Unlimited)
00:38:935 (1,2,3,4) - I wish these were more spread and kicky cause it's pretty unsatisfying to play for me (I like how it goes back and forth in the insane)
01:21:133 (7) - More bend maybe?

I thought about it a lot, but I'm sorry that I can't help much... Have a star!
Milan-
1,473 posts
Joined August 2011
Milan-
first sana now yuikonnu, what's next'?? nameless plz

Esay
-00:13:056 (3,4) - keep mapping to vocals would've been a better idea i think. right now it's a bit confusing because of the 3/2 slider before. like http://puu.sh/pcqOi/96e1362844.jpg . same with the copypaste rhythms after
-00:20:803 (3) - you could go with a 1/2 slider easily here. the sv is fast and the instruments call for it so i dont see problem on my end owo

Normal
-00:52:781 (5) - this http://puu.sh/pcr65/3664ce7bc7.jpg sound much better imo o

hard
-00:00:529 - this normal whistle doesn't sound good here ;;. it's rather annoying. (actually i'd just use a soft wihstle at 00:00:529 - and remove the others because, this is just the intro and hitsounds sound overused ) . same on others diffs
-00:06:627 (2,3) - using another kind of arrange for these two would be cool. as a way to emphasis 00:07:287 (1,1) - as their own combo or smthnig
-00:09:594 (1,3) - nc'ng on crashes make more sense than nc'ng random beats tho. same 00:10:254 (1,3) - . (it''s basically the same as 00:20:474 (1,1) - lul) same on others diffs
-01:14:540 (1,2,3) - rip hard players combo

insane
-00:26:737 (4) - x291y356 ? plays more natural i think xd
-01:20:803 (4,5,6) - u like emphasizing, dont you? moving (5) down left would add more distance towards (6) lo

Unlimited
-00:37:781 (1,2) - im actually confused here, you're trying to emphasized vocals by extending the first slider, but on the second one you ignore them basically. using 2 circles instead of a slider would do the job i guess and would be consistent with 00:36:792 (2,3,4) - and 00:35:638 (2,3) - (altho extending slider sounds unnecessary here;;). same on skyliyyit
-00:40:748 (1,2,3,4,5) - spamming circles when nothing is happening compared to the verse right before, disgusting pp mapper (jk tho not so jk tho tho jk ok nojk)
-00:51:792 (1) - nc why

sky lit
-00:01:353 (2,3) - custom stacking these would be better as similar patterns like 00:02:012 (1,2) - stack uh. prob doing that for 1/4 gaps like here too 01:21:792 (2,3) - would be better but dunno what you think
-00:02:671 (4,5) - too close oo
-00:05:309 (3,4,5,6) - this is kinda disorienting tbh.. moving (4) somewhere else would be better, or even ctrlg'ng 00:05:474 (4,5) - makes more sense flow-wise uh
-00:11:078 (2,3,4,5,1) - that doesnt look good at all ;; dunno what you're trying to do but distance between 2 and 3 just doesnt fit the stream, in addition that your streams seem to be doing a circular curve but then the slider is lineal using a different angle aaaa
-00:43:880 (1) - nc why 00:51:792 (1) -
Lasse
osu! Alumni
3,648 posts
Joined June 2011
Topic Starter
Lasse
owo (somehow the formatting breaks the other spoilerbox version):
SPOILER

[ owo] wrote:

My bad mod4mod mod

Overall: I couldn't find anything blatantly wrong with it (as expected), so below are just my personal quibbles.

Easy
00:08:770 (1) - This shape just doesn't fit here imo. More like https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/5286795 maybe this is nicer
00:33:990 (3,4) - Sorta icky looking. It will look sorta better with these coordinates: red anchor (302, 40) 2nd white anchor (335, 20) last white anchor (374, 29)
00:40:419 (1,2,3,4) - Looks better like this imo: https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/5286821 improved this a little
00:47:836 (4) - I think this belongs on 00:48:001 instead both work depending on what to follow, but current polarity is a little easier cause it puts teh change on a slider
00:48:990 (2) - Bad blanket- try: 1st white anchor (462, 318) 1st red anchor (425,274)made it better

Normal
00:03:001 (5) - Looks better imo with a red anchor in the middle and bent doesnt work for me
00:05:803 (5) - Looks a bit weird to me, maybe give it bend or a red anchor? it's kinda cute cause it reminds me of 2007
00:13:221 (4,5) - In order to click important beats, I suggest something more like: https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/5286759
00:15:858 (4,5) - Same rhythm suggestion prefer to focus on guitar here and it gives a nice polarity. also the part is to calm for actual circle-> slider 1/2 taps on normal

Hard
00:53:605 (1,2,3) - Judging by the music, I'm not sure why this isn't just 4 hitcircles (also, 90 degree just doesn't flow well to me) keeps the map easier, I still have a spread to fit xd
01:03:990 (1,3) - Could be better blanket tried
01:04:649 (3) - Looks awk to me cause whenever I see something like this slider tail, I expect something right next to it.

Insane
00:21:627 (2,3,4,5,1) - I honestly wish this had more spacing- feels a bit weird to me as it is (more like 00:54:265 (1,2,3,4,1) maybe) manual stack is fine here
00:37:122 (4) - Small thing... make this upside down so 00:37:122 (4,5) are like mirror opposites maybe?prefer to have the sldier point towards next object
01:09:759 (2) - I feel like it would flow better if this were placed on 01:09:100 (7) or somewhere to the right flow is totally fine here o:
01:15:693 (1,2,3,4,1) - Unsatisfying :( wont put higher spacing on a pretty easy insane

Unlimited
00:31:023 (1) - This in particular might play better if shortened and added a hitcircle at its tail at 00:31:353. i dont do many vocal 3/4s on this diff
00:32:012 (6,7,8) - Same problem as Starlit Sky for this timestamp, except its harder to correct here imo see other diff
00:54:265 (1,2,3,4,1) - I particularly don't like the curve of this ( 00:54:430 (3,4,1) is too straight, but it might be your stylistic choice)
I'm thinking something more like: https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/5286592
01:13:056 (3,1) - This particular slider shape doesn't look that good to me copy pasted. My idea: https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/5286625 shapes look fine to me
01:16:023 (1) - I think the slider tail is pointed the wrong way, looks better and flows better pointed down instead imo https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/5286630 doesnt really matter on this slider and current shape is nicer
01:26:243 (2,3,4,5,1) - I see that you did slider to stream with 01:25:748 (1) slider, but it just plays off to me (cause I'm bad lel) Actually I didn't. I just placed the last note to be similar and give more emphasis lol

Starlit Sky
00:05:968 (7) - More bend maybe? wud be too much
00:32:012 (6,7,8) - I think that here, you want to map the drums? (as suggested by hitsounding) but by my inspection, the drums don't go into 1/4 rhythm and are only 1/2, so your mapped portion doesn't quite fit.
Anyway, you can easily fix this by following the synth in the background instead, which is 1/4. Try making 00:32:177 (7) a 1/4 kickslider instead. Or you could just make it stream. (easier to fix here than in Unlimited) mainly focusing on the high pitched thing and works fine
00:38:935 (1,2,3,4) - I wish these were more spread and kicky cause it's pretty unsatisfying to play for me (I like how it goes back and forth in the insane) so cute tho : (
01:21:133 (7) - More bend maybe? a

I thought about it a lot, but I'm sorry that I can't help much... Have a star!

milan

Milan- wrote:

first sana now yuikonnu, what's next'?? nameless plz

Esay
-00:13:056 (3,4) - keep mapping to vocals would've been a better idea i think. right now it's a bit confusing because of the 3/2 slider before. like http://puu.sh/pcqOi/96e1362844.jpg . same with the copypaste rhythms after might consider, but I tried both (i know I'm not really target audience lol) and this felt better to follow
-00:20:803 (3) - you could go with a 1/2 slider easily here. the sv is fast and the instruments call for it so i dont see problem on my end owo I hate kickslider on easy diffs and it would also be the only one

Normal
-00:52:781 (5) - this http://puu.sh/pcr65/3664ce7bc7.jpg sound much better imo o spikes the difficulty a little but fits well so yehaj

hard
-00:00:529 - this normal whistle doesn't sound good here ;;. it's rather annoying. (actually i'd just use a soft wihstle at 00:00:529 - and remove the others because, this is just the intro and hitsounds sound overused ) . same on others diffs there wasn't supposed to be whistles on all ticks lol. changed to only 1x soft (2x for extra diffs cause clicking)
-00:06:627 (2,3) - using another kind of arrange for these two would be cool. as a way to emphasis 00:07:287 (1,1) - as their own combo or smthnig idk yet, might do sth here lo
-00:09:594 (1,3) - nc'ng on crashes make more sense than nc'ng random beats tho. same 00:10:254 (1,3) - . (it''s basically the same as 00:20:474 (1,1) - lul) same on others diffs both work imo, but this looks so much nicer with the pattern
-01:14:540 (1,2,3) - rip hard players combo rip

insane
-00:26:737 (4) - x291y356 ? plays more natural i think xd that works
-01:20:803 (4,5,6) - u like emphasizing, dont you? moving (5) down left would add more distance towards (6) lo triple is enough emphasis and 01:20:309 (2,4,5) - is so nice

Unlimited
-00:37:781 (1,2) - im actually confused here, you're trying to emphasized vocals by extending the first slider, but on the second one you ignore them basically. using 2 circles instead of a slider would do the job i guess and would be consistent with 00:36:792 (2,3,4) - and 00:35:638 (2,3) - (altho extending slider sounds unnecessary here;;). same on skyliyyit lol I just extended the slider here cause red and blue tick are both empty
-00:40:748 (1,2,3,4,5) - spamming circles when nothing is happening compared to the verse right before, disgusting pp mapper (jk tho not so jk tho tho jk ok nojk) wot there's a guitar buildup : v
-00:51:792 (1) - nc why I like nc on back and forth things cus I thinkl it looks nicer. also fits vocals so i'll keep for now

sky lit
-00:01:353 (2,3) - custom stacking these would be better as similar patterns like 00:02:012 (1,2) - stack uh. prob doing that for 1/4 gaps like here too guess why it's stack leniency 2 B) 01:21:792 (2,3) - would be better but dunno what you think
-00:02:671 (4,5) - too close oo : O totally overlooked that for some reason, fixed
-00:05:309 (3,4,5,6) - this is kinda disorienting tbh.. moving (4) somewhere else would be better, or even ctrlg'ng 00:05:474 (4,5) - makes more sense flow-wise uh swapped them for now
-00:11:078 (2,3,4,5,1) - that doesnt look good at all ;; dunno what you're trying to do but distance between 2 and 3 just doesnt fit the stream, in addition that your streams seem to be doing a circular curve but then the slider is lineal using a different angle aaaa don't talk to me or my weird streams ever again. it's meant to get smaller as the music fades into a calm part
-00:43:880 (1) - nc why same reason as other diff00:51:792 (1) - too

thanks for the mods!
Sotarks
3,524 posts
Joined May 2014
Sotarks
Hi! M4M

Starlit Sky

  1. what about decreasing stack to 0.9 ?
  2. 00:13:056 (2) - the fact that this note is under this slider has 0 emphasis on the kick/voice beat we have here, makes me sad :C
  3. 00:21:957 (1) - please this slider art for this kind of map doesn't fit at all, it's espacially for wubs pls.
  4. 00:45:529 (5,1) - you missed a note between those 2, like a triple would be nice here
  5. 00:54:594 (1) - i guess it's just me, but shapes like that fits only for wubs map..
  6. 00:57:561 (3) - what about making a normal shape, like the one you're using is useless because it creates a anti-flow, and normaly you use that to create one, but yeah it's just imo.
  7. 01:15:529 (5) - imo this would better if it was stacked, fits the structure
  8. 01:15:693 (1,2,3,4,1) - why are u decreasing the spacing here, feels random

Unlimited

  1. why just not rename it "extra", like only last diff can have a custom name, feels weird in your spread tbh.
  2. 00:13:056 (2) - U don't wanna stack it propelly, or is it intentional?
  3. 00:31:023 (1) - wub slider again aaa
  4. 01:14:540 (1) - nice vagina
    I really like this diff o/

Insane

  1. 00:18:166 (2,3) - this patern is totally confusing, i'l really reconsider this patern tbh. maybe like 00:18:166 (2,3) - ctrl g those 2, and 00:18:496 (4) - ctrl g this one too, it could be an option, or w/e xd
  2. 00:45:529 (5,1) - missing this triple again here makes me sad
  3. 00:58:715 (1) - aaaaa wub slider again

I like the creativity in this set!
GL~
Last edited by Sotarks , edited 1 time in total.
Lasse
osu! Alumni
3,648 posts
Joined June 2011
Topic Starter
Lasse
Sotarks

Sotarks wrote:

Hi! M4M

Starlit Sky

  1. what about decreasing stack to 0.9 ? it's built around current and perfectly rankable, kills some patterns
  2. 00:13:056 (2) - the fact that this note is under this slider has 0 emphasis on the kick/voice beat we have here, makes me sad :C concept of the whole part to stack after this and fits with how calm it is + want to emphasize guitar on red ticks
  3. 00:21:957 (1) - please this slider art for this kind of map doesn't fit at all, it's espacially for wubs pls. it's cute, just because other people use it for wub sounds doesn't mean I cant use it for cymbals : v
  4. 00:45:529 (5,1) - you missed a note between those 2, like a triple would be nice here there is a slight sound, but triple feels too much and would make me have to space 00:45:529 (5) - or sth and kickslider doesnt feel right either so I undermapped it a bit
  5. 00:54:594 (1) - i guess it's just me, but shapes like that fits only for wubs map..
  6. 00:57:561 (3) - what about making a normal shape, like the one you're using is useless because it creates a anti-flow, and normaly you use that to create one, but yeah it's just imo. I changed it a little, but general shape stays since it needs to be like this to work better with 00:56:737 (1) - without creating overlaps or having the end point in a weird direction
  7. 01:15:529 (5) - imo this would better if it was stacked, fits the structure differentiates it from 01:14:869 (2) - which has no vocal
  8. 01:15:693 (1,2,3,4,1) - why are u decreasing the spacing here, feels random leads into slightly slower part

Unlimited

  1. why just not rename it "extra", like only last diff can have a custom name, feels weird in your spread tbh. it's not custom. it's from the game the song is from, just like normal=standard. indicated difficulty wel enough imo
  2. 00:13:056 (2) - U don't wanna stack it propelly, or is it intentional? my manual stacks even confuse me lol changed for now
  3. 00:31:023 (1) - wub slider again aaa pretty sick wub song tbh
  4. 01:14:540 (1) - nice vagina pls it's supposed to be part of flower shape http://i.imgur.com/LySCq70.jpg
    I really like this diff o/ same

Insane

  1. 00:18:166 (2,3) - this patern is totally confusing, i'l really reconsider this patern tbh. maybe like 00:18:166 (2,3) - ctrl g those 2, and 00:18:496 (4) - ctrl g this one too, it could be an option, or w/e xd changed this to make it more readable even if is slightly inconsistent with before now
  2. 00:45:529 (5,1) - missing this triple again here makes me sad
  3. 00:58:715 (1) - aaaaa wub slider again

[bI like the creativity in this set![/b]
GL~
thanks!
moonlightleaf
2,164 posts
Joined September 2011
moonlightleaf
[Starlit Sky]
00:05:638 (5,6) - stack is a little confused for me ,try this
https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/5288578

00:48:825 (3,4) - Ctrl+g

[Unlimited]

00:00:529 (1,2,3,4) - i perfer do as Sky-diff , this is the 2nd low ex , so would be better not to use these notes

00:40:254 (1,2) - confuse to click the 2

In fact i am shit and can't understand the ex diff , so i try(force me to mod that , but i am really can't understand and give you more suggestion ,) so i give up the m4m , NO KD , sorry :?
Momizi
275 posts
Joined June 2013
Momizi
hi,pay debt
[General]
the color of comboo 4 and 8 is a little strange for me，i know you use bright colour to make people notice quik part.and i dont konw how to adjust colours,just a fell ;W;,its nott very suit the BG.if its me,i maybe use some bright purple to suit the blue BG
[Starlit Sky]
00:03:166 (6) - if dont have any special purpose，stack with 00:02:342 (2) - ？
00:03:990 (2) - make the tail a liittle left to suit 00:03:496 (1) - for better blanket
00:11:078 (2,3) - this distance on purpose，i think ds is better..
00:12:561 (1) - ctrl+G can fell better for me
00:41:737 (1) - use colour 4 or 8 for sudden big jump
01:25:089 (3,3) - how abourt speed up these two sliders
00:08:770 (3) - and 00:11:160 (3) - use normal whistle? sounds better for me
00:39:265 (2) - remove clap for soft part here and,you also not use clap behind (from 00:40:254 (1) - to 00:41:655 (3) - )
00:50:144 (4) - move a liittle left for better flow from 3 or rotate some angle
00:59:787 (2) - use drum as 01:00:034 (1,2) - ？
nice dif,i love this dif XD
[Unlimited]
00:21:957 (1) - seem a little fast,its seem harder than the highest dif
00:32:012 (4) - chage tail to flow 00:32:177 (1) - likehttps://osu.ppy.sh/ss/5317743
00:42:891 (1,2,3) - i thought i open the stacikng，i think here stack can be better..
00:49:979 (2,3) - flow not well,chage some angle of 3 https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/5317765 and dont foregt adjust 00:49:485 (1) -
01:03:990 (1,3) - not blanket very well
[Insane]
00:07:287 (1,2,1,2) - these four sounds strongger than 00:06:627 (2,3) - ,so i dont think reapeat is the best way
00:16:353 (4,1) - umm,how to say,this overlap is fine to me,and maybe others will also say this overlap,just a notice
00:59:375 (1) -this slider dont look good,i mean the red anchor's part not well
[Hard]
I think hard dont need bright colours for NC,bright colours are litte abrupt
00:06:627 (2,3) - try to not touch,dont very like these
perrty good

nice song and nice map,cant mod very much,just shot a star instead,GL XD
Lasse
osu! Alumni
3,648 posts
Joined June 2011
Topic Starter
Lasse
Momizi

Momizi wrote:

hi,pay debt
[General]
the color of comboo 4 and 8 is a little strange for me，i know you use bright colour to make people notice quik part.and i dont konw how to adjust colours,just a fell ;W;,its nott very suit the BG.if its me,i maybe use some bright purple to suit the blue BG
might consider that, but I reallylike how they contrast the bg, they are only used very rarely as "highlights" so it works well imo
[Starlit Sky]
00:03:166 (6) - if dont have any special purpose，stack with 00:02:342 (2) - ？manually stacked 2 instead of this now it looks a little better
00:03:990 (2) - make the tail a liittle left to suit 00:03:496 (1) - for better blanket i think this is fine already http://i.imgur.com/XVveCsi.jpg o:
00:11:078 (2,3) - this distance on purpose，i think ds is better.. decreasing spacing as the volume fades and song goes into calm part
00:12:561 (1) - ctrl+G can fell better for me current is nicer
00:41:737 (1) - use colour 4 or 8 for sudden big jump color buildup light pink into bright colors for the fast sliders is better imo
01:25:089 (3,3) - how abourt speed up these two sliders good idea, done here and 00:09:924 (3,3) -
00:08:770 (3) - and 00:11:160 (3) - use normal whistle? sounds better for me would be too much normal w for this part
00:39:265 (2) - remove clap for soft part here and,you also not use clap behind (from 00:40:254 (1) - to 00:41:655 (3) - ) but there are still snares, removing claps wouldnt fit
00:50:144 (4) - move a liittle left for better flow from 3 or rotate some angle plays fine and 00:49:485 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - has a nice structure
00:59:787 (2) - use drum as 01:00:034 (1,2) - ？triple here emphasizes the piano, so soft
nice dif,i love this dif XD
[Unlimited]
00:21:957 (1) - seem a little fast,its seem harder than the highest dif oh this diff uses higher sv for most stuff, but also way lower cs
00:32:012 (4) - chage tail to flow 00:32:177 (1) - likehttps://osu.ppy.sh/ss/5317743 love this pattern too much and it's only kicksliders so visuals > other
00:42:891 (1,2,3) - i thought i open the stacikng，i think here stack can be better.. fixed manual stacks
00:49:979 (2,3) - flow not well,chage some angle of 3 https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/5317765 and dont foregt adjust 00:49:485 (1) - moved 3 a bit instead but it plays fine and look nicer xd
01:03:990 (1,3) - not blanket very well tried to fix
[Insane]
00:07:287 (1,2,1,2) - these four sounds strongger than 00:06:627 (2,3) - ,so i dont think reapeat is the best way same musical pattern so it fits well imo
00:16:353 (4,1) - umm,how to say,this overlap is fine to me,and maybe others will also say this overlap,just a notice
00:59:375 (1) -this slider dont look good,i mean the red anchor's part not well tried lol
[Hard]
I think hard dont need bright colours for NC,bright colours are litte abrupt I'd rather have my color usage consistent for those diffs and it seems fine to me o:
00:06:627 (2,3) - try to not touch,dont very like these think it's a cute pattern and the overlaps are not on a level that makes it hard to read
perrty good

nice song and nice map,cant mod very much,just shot a star instead,GL XD

moonlightleaf

moonlightleaf wrote:

[Starlit Sky]
00:05:638 (5,6) - stack is a little confused for me ,try this
https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/5288578 changes this pattern

00:48:825 (3,4) - Ctrl+g dont want a star here, this puts more emphasis on 00:48:990 (4,6) - drums

[Unlimited]

00:00:529 (1,2,3,4) - i perfer do as Sky-diff , this is the 2nd low ex , so would be better not to use these notes yes

00:40:254 (1,2) - confuse to click the 2 seems fine to me o:

In fact i am shit and can't understand the ex diff , so i try(force me to mod that , but i am really can't understand and give you more suggestion ,) so i give up the m4m , NO KD , sorry :? thanks anyways!

thanks for modding!
Left
2,163 posts
Joined October 2014
Left
I love this song! Rank this pls~
Ashton
2,002 posts
Joined February 2016
Ashton
m4m
my map
https://osu.ppy.sh/s/464505

my mod

Insane

will mod 3 diffs for the three diffs you mod (all std)

00:24:924 (1,2,1,2,1) - I think you can remap this to a better pattern

00:32:342 (2,1) - I think you can make this look nicer

00:56:078 (1,2,1) - this looks really weird, consider blanketing it or making a better design

unlimited

00:37:781 (1,2) - how these sliders 'mend' together... it's just weird and it looks messy, I hate sliders like this

00:42:232 (1,1) - this does not look clean

00:56:078 (1,2,1) - ^

01:00:199 (3,1,2) - ^


starlit sky


00:01:353 (2,3) - weird mending sliders

00:04:649 (1,2) - ^ I think that it flows good though but it looks messy

00:06:627 (2,3) - ^

01:16:518 (2,3) - ^

01:19:814 (1,2) - ^ sorry I know they have a good flow but I just hate the look



OKAY I'M DONE
Lasse
osu! Alumni
3,648 posts
Joined June 2011
Topic Starter
Lasse
that pattern on insane is totally fine and fits the structure of the whole secion
others are all complaints about clean/planned overlaps or stacked sliders
no changes, thanks anyways lol
Hobbes2
osu! Alumni
2,251 posts
Joined March 2016
Hobbes2
My end of the m4m from your queue ~

[General]

01:26:655 (1) - Why does the volume reduction for the spinner slow down at the end of it? It's kinda noticeable that it's not gradual for the last couple of volume reductions.

[Easy]

00:50:474 (4,1) - I don't really like this dropoff. I think a position near x:280 y:116 (not exactly this, but this area) feels better to play. This would mean you'd have to adjust everything after it though, rip.

01:12:726 (4) - maybe position this so the "v" part of the slider is exactly horizontal with 01:11:902 (3)? I suck at articulating lol

01:23:111 (4,1) - u prob dont have to fix this but its bugging me that these aren't exactly parallel :\ maybe make em both perfectly vertical?

01:26:737 (1) - not too big of a fan of spinners this close to the final hit circle in an ez, maybe move it to 01:26:902?

[Standard]

Wow this diff looks really good. No comments.

[Hard]

00:08:276 (2) - might be cool if this slider breaks the pattern and faces a different direction to emphasize the high pitched sound

00:25:583 (4) - x:336 y:192 for better flow? Problem I have now is that it's closer to 3 than 1 but I don't think there's a reason for it be like that.

00:28:221 (4) - x:148 y:155 for a similar reason as above.

00:31:023 (1,3) - this blanket would work better if the slider point circled in this picture was moved up a bit more.

01:23:441 (2) - Thing i mentioned above with making face a different direction to emphasize the high pitched sound.

Overall a fun difficulty, I liked it a lot.

[Insane]

00:08:276 (2) - At the risk of sounding like a broken record...yeah. Same thing I commented about this in the hard, and when this happens again later on in the map.

00:22:616 (3,1) - Might look better like this, so basically move 3 up a bit.

01:01:682 (2) - Mostly me thinking out loud but this spacing reduction felt weird to play. I'm not sure how you'd fix it if you do choose to change it, though.

fun map!

Took a look at the other two diffs (unlimited and starlit sky) because I can't pass them, so I can't comment on stuff like spacing, but I can say that aesthetically I can't find any problems. Blankets and all that crap looked great.

Good luck! If you don't think my mod was helpful, It would be fine if you skipped a difficulty or two on my map.
Lasse
osu! Alumni
3,648 posts
Joined June 2011
Topic Starter
Lasse
Hobbes2

Hobbes2 wrote:

My end of the m4m from your queue ~

[General]

01:26:655 (1) - Why does the volume reduction for the spinner slow down at the end of it? It's kinda noticeable that it's not gradual for the last couple of volume reductions. fits the fading of the music better

[Easy]

00:50:474 (4,1) - I don't really like this dropoff. I think a position near x:280 y:116 (not exactly this, but this area) feels better to play. This would mean you'd have to adjust everything after it though, rip. it's fine movement and emphasizes the cymbal

01:12:726 (4) - maybe position this so the "v" part of the slider is exactly horizontal with 01:11:902 (3)? I suck at articulating lol tried

01:23:111 (4,1) - u prob dont have to fix this but its bugging me that these aren't exactly parallel :\ maybe make em both perfectly vertical? not supposed to be parallel, those are mirrored

01:26:737 (1) - not too big of a fan of spinners this close to the final hit circle in an ez, maybe move it to 01:26:902? snapepd to white tick

[Standard]

Wow this diff looks really good. No comments.

[Hard]

00:08:276 (2) - might be cool if this slider breaks the pattern and faces a different direction to emphasize the high pitched sound sure picth changes, but the musical pattern itself is repetitive so I'll keep gameplay the same way here

00:25:583 (4) - x:336 y:192 for better flow? Problem I have now is that it's closer to 3 than 1 but I don't think there's a reason for it be like that.

00:28:221 (4) - x:148 y:155 for a similar reason as above.
would break my jump on downbeat consistency for this part

00:31:023 (1,3) - this blanket would work better if the slider point circled in this picture was moved up a bit more. tried

01:23:441 (2) - Thing i mentioned above with making face a different direction to emphasize the high pitched sound.

Overall a fun difficulty, I liked it a lot.

[Insane]

00:08:276 (2) - At the risk of sounding like a broken record...yeah. Same thing I commented about this in the hard, and when this happens again later on in the map. s before

00:22:616 (3,1) - Might look better like this, so basically move 3 up a bit. kills consistent overlap spacing

01:01:682 (2) - Mostly me thinking out loud but this spacing reduction felt weird to play. I'm not sure how you'd fix it if you do choose to change it, though. similar to some other spacings + nice visuals

fun map!

Took a look at the other two diffs (unlimited and starlit sky) because I can't pass them, so I can't comment on stuff like spacing, but I can say that aesthetically I can't find any problems. Blankets and all that crap looked great.

Good luck! If you don't think my mod was helpful, It would be fine if you skipped a difficulty or two on my map.
thanks!
-Atri-
3,049 posts
Joined March 2013
-Atri-
Plz rank this so i don't need to rank my version :p
squishyguppy
1,256 posts
Joined March 2014
squishyguppy
in insane I got so sad when I saw 00:11:408 (1) - because of all the other sliders before it :(
Lasse
osu! Alumni
3,648 posts
Joined June 2011
Topic Starter
Lasse

[alt][F4] wrote:

in insane I got so sad when I saw 00:11:408 (1) - because of all the other sliders before it :(
the sliders are the main concept of the diff :d
"normal" parts: vertical, only upwards movement until chorus, downwards after chorus (some repeats break it a bit..)
"calm" parts (grey combo): horizontal
chorus: mixed


KuranteMelodii wrote:

Plz rank this so i don't need to rank my version :p
I didn't really look for BN for this yet, but I'll probably do soon!
Irohas
1,353 posts
Joined May 2014
Irohas
hi m4m from your queue!

[Hard]
  1. 00:32:177 (4,1) - I don't really think that it's necessary to make a 1/4 slider here. As they're nothing at 00:32:259, maybe make a triplet at 00:32:342 instead. but anyway I think it's still playable and fun to play. I just wanted to get noticed xd
  2. 00:20:474 (1) - Emphasize a little bit more here would be better imo. Since the song radically change from here. To show that this and last part are totally different.
  3. 00:26:902 (4,1) - What about consistency with 00:24:265 (4,5,1) - ? or maybe remove 00:24:512 (5) - I think it's better without. But the problem still the same, you should make it consistent.
  4. 00:53:523 - Why you didn't map this while you did it at 00:53:193 (5) - they've same sounds imo.
  5. 01:09:265 (1) - The change direction would emphasize it more and personally I think it would play better if you ctrl+g.
[Insane]
  1. 00:45:529 (5,1) - It seems that you missed something between. Since it's same part that 00:34:979 (5,1) - I highly recommend to not skip. Make a triplet maybe ?
  2. 01:01:518 (1,2) - Try to space a bit like 01:12:067 (1,2) - for consistency. Cause it's too close maybe. If you want absolutely keep stack (2) on 01:00:693 (5) - 's tail you can simply move (1) further
[Standard]
  1. 00:13:221 (4) - I don't really get it why you put this here. You can't simply add a circle at 00:13:056 and remove (4). Cause I think it could have some misleadings because of that. (simply my opinion)
    and I see that you use this flow alot of times. So I think you have a reason to make that. But it would be simply more redable.
  2. 00:26:737 (6) - Stack better ? Or it's voluntary ?
  3. 01:19:814 (3) - Maybe you should copy/paste and ctrl+h 01:20:474 (4) - to make this more aesthetic ?
[Unlimited]
  1. 00:26:902 (5,1) - It seems like you skip something between both
  2. 01:13:056 (3,1) - ^
[]
Really sorry for this short mod. Overall it's really good. Have a star! Good luck!
Lasse
osu! Alumni
3,648 posts
Joined June 2011
Topic Starter
Lasse
MugiwaraSekai

MugiwaraSekai wrote:

hi m4m from your queue!

[Hard]
  1. 00:32:177 (4,1) - I don't really think that it's necessary to make a 1/4 slider here. As they're nothing at 00:32:259, maybe make a triplet at 00:32:342 instead. but anyway I think it's still playable and fun to play. I just wanted to get noticed xd
    I agree that the first repeat is overmapped, but it's not clickable and fits fine so I'll keep it
  2. 00:20:474 (1) - Emphasize a little bit more here would be better imo. Since the song radically change from here. To show that this and last part are totally different. yes
  3. 00:26:902 (4,1) - What about consistency with 00:24:265 (4,5,1) - ? or maybe remove 00:24:512 (5) - I think it's better without. But the problem still the same, you should make it consistent. not needed, the drums might be similar, but it's not like the musically completely repeats, so having them a bit different is fine imo
  4. 00:53:523 - Why you didn't map this while you did it at 00:53:193 (5) - they've same sounds imo. mainly for lower difficulty and a jump is nice too lol
  5. 01:09:265 (1) - The change direction would emphasize it more and personally I think it would play better if you ctrl+g current break in flow gives fine emphasis and spacing/movement afterwards is nicer.
[Insane]
  1. 00:45:529 (5,1) - It seems that you missed something between. Since it's same part that 00:34:979 (5,1) - I highly recommend to not skip. Make a triplet maybe ? similar to unlimited
  2. 01:01:518 (1,2) - Try to space a bit like 01:12:067 (1,2) - for consistency. Cause it's too close maybe. If you want absolutely keep stack (2) on 01:00:693 (5) - 's tail you can simply move (1) further fixed 01:01:353 (7,1,2) - spacing, which also kinda fixed this
[Standard]
  1. 00:13:221 (4) - I don't really get it why you put this here. You can't simply add a circle at 00:13:056 and remove (4). Cause I think it could have some misleadings because of that. (simply my opinion)
    and I see that you use this flow alot of times. So I think you have a reason to make that. But it would be simply more redable.
    It is fine to read, spaced like all other 1/1 gaps. this works way better with the rhythm of the song (besides drums maybe) and it fits well
  2. 00:26:737 (6) - Stack better ? Or it's voluntary ? it's a simple manual stack lol
  3. 01:19:814 (3) - Maybe you should copy/paste and ctrl+h 01:20:474 (4) - to make this more aesthetic ? changed the shape
[Unlimited]
  1. 00:26:902 (5,1) - It seems like you skip something between both
  2. 01:13:056 (3,1) - ^ undermapping those to focus on other things is totally fine
[]
Really sorry for this short mod. Overall it's really good. Have a star! Good luck!
thanks!
Underforest
5,895 posts
Joined July 2015
Underforest
I can mod your map but I'm blacklisted xd
take an star and gl!
-Atri-
3,049 posts
Joined March 2013
-Atri-
Ni ma de i rather have this version of Hoshitachi ranked instead, I really hate my version and it's so messy and terrible tbh I wanted to remap but i have no innovation orz

Ultra no sense modding incoming


  • [Unlimited]
  1. 00:32:507 (1) - Ctrl+g, put them to about x:386/y:306 , otherwise the cursor movement will be jigged, Don't forget to not let them touch other objects after you changed it, also, too close
    How the cursor moved for the current pattern, notice the blue line means the movement didn't go smoothly

    Yeah i know it's meh, but at least it's clear enough
  2. 00:39:594 (3) - You're ignoring the white tick, which have the drums to be in place, even it does follow the vocals perfectly, but ending up feeling that i have something missing there
  3. 00:56:572 (2,2) - x:400/y:129 , same problem for jigged motion, and not pretty much supporting this kind of flow separation, and adjust the pattern later on
  4. 01:07:122 (2,2) - ^, x:225/y:44


  • [Starlit Sky]
  1. 00:06:957 (3,2,2) - Soooo... you desired to use some kind of "slider" gimmick there, Maybe unstack it for a little bit so it can read easily, from what i could see is not pretty much people could know there's another slider there
    :::
    Oh yeah, also adjust the position of 00:07:946 (1) - and 00:08:935 (4) - after you changed it
  2. 00:12:232 (3) - Since this part is mapped the vocals mostly, what i could see if you place a slider there to let 00:12:232 - Clickable, but the stronger vocals is at 00:12:397 - , so i think you making the stronger vocals unclickable feels meh for me, I know you also make the the slider end vocal unclickable at 00:14:045 (1) - and 00:15:199 (1) - , But they feel better unlike the one i pointed out, and both slider head and slider end were have the same strength of vocals (But 3/4 and a circle is better though)
    :::
    Or use the same rhythm as 00:16:682 (1,2,3,4) -
  3. 00:19:979 (3,4) - The stack isn't supporting anything, in this case, the first vocal is sightly stronger than the second, so slider is better at there
  4. 00:20:968 (3) - Just my opinion though, you could move 00:20:309 (5) - and stack 00:20:968 (3) - since they're the same sound
    :::
  5. 00:23:111 (1) - I know that you're blanketing 00:23:441 (2) - , but i think placing like this will play more smoothly
    ::
  6. 00:39:594 (3) -Some problem i mentioned previous diffs
  7. 01:22:122 (3,2,2) - same thing i mentioned before

That's all
Lasse
osu! Alumni
3,648 posts
Joined June 2011
Topic Starter
Lasse
@KuranteMelodii (my normal box formatting doesnt work cause of your boxes, rip
SPOILER

KuranteMelodii wrote:

Ni ma de i rather have this version of Hoshitachi ranked instead, I really hate my version and it's so messy and terrible tbh I wanted to remap but i have no innovation orz

Ultra no sense modding incoming


  • [Unlimited]
  1. 00:32:507 (1) - Ctrl+g, put them to about x:386/y:306 , otherwise the cursor movement will be jigged, Don't forget to not let them touch other objects after you changed it, also, too close
    How the cursor moved for the current pattern, notice the blue line means the movement didn't go smoothly

    Yeah i know it's meh, but at least it's clear enough
    that might play "nicer" but I find the abrupt flow break much better fitting to the music/emphasis and lvoer the current look of it
  2. 00:39:594 (3) - You're ignoring the white tick, which have the drums to be in place, even it does follow the vocals perfectly, but ending up feeling that i have something missing there I get that, but the current pattern 00:38:935 (1,2,3,4) - is all mapped to vocals, so ignoring drum is okay. mappinf it here would feel rather weird with the others
  3. 00:56:572 (2,2) - x:400/y:129 , same problem for jigged motion, and not pretty much supporting this kind of flow separation, and adjust the pattern later on I had a weird feeling about this for some time, remade this pattern
  4. 01:07:122 (2,2) - ^, x:225/y:44 I actually think this one is fine cause the angle is sharper already


  • [Starlit Sky]
  1. 00:06:957 (3,2,2) - Soooo... you desired to use some kind of "slider" gimmick there, Maybe unstack it for a little bit so it can read easily, from what i could see is not pretty much people could know there's another slider there
    :::
    Oh yeah, also adjust the position of 00:07:946 (1) - and 00:08:935 (4) - after you changed it
    due to the sv changes the sliderends are already unstacked http://i.imgur.com/tZZHPZT.jpg I think thats enough and people read it just fine so far
  2. 00:12:232 (3) - Since this part is mapped the vocals mostly, what i could see if you place a slider there to let 00:12:232 - Clickable, but the stronger vocals is at 00:12:397 - , so i think you making the stronger vocals unclickable feels meh for me, I know you also make the the slider end vocal unclickable at 00:14:045 (1) - and 00:15:199 (1) - , But they feel better unlike the one i pointed out, and both slider head and slider end were have the same strength of vocals (But 3/4 and a circle is better though)
    :::
    Or use the same rhythm as 00:16:682 (1,2,3,4) -
    go sth wrong then, whole part is mapped to the instrument mainly, only focusing vocalsd when there is no piano/guitar stuff :d
  3. 00:19:979 (3,4) - The stack isn't supporting anything, in this case, the first vocal is sightly stronger than the second, so slider is better at there it follows my stack pattern. 00:19:979 (3,4) - is more like a held vocal, so having a stop here and a jump on the clap after feels nicer and consistent with my patterning for this part
  4. 00:20:968 (3) - Just my opinion though, you could move 00:20:309 (5) - and stack 00:20:968 (3) - since they're the same sound
    :::
    yeah the sound is similar, but in a different context/music transitions, so this wouldnt really do anything except using less of the playfield
  5. 00:23:111 (1) - I know that you're blanketing 00:23:441 (2) - , but i think placing like this will play more smoothly
    ::
  6. 00:39:594 (3) -Some problem i mentioned previous diffs ya
  7. 01:22:122 (3,2,2) - same thing i mentioned before

That's all
thanks for the unexpected mod!
sahuang
2,294 posts
Joined December 2014
sahuang
M4M

Bold= Highly recommended
Red= Unrankable

[General]
  1. HP setting is not reasonable imo. From Standard to Hard it jumps from 3.5 to 6 which is bit too much. And HP7.5 for 5.55 stars map is also bit overdone.
    I'd suggest HP-0.5 for Hard, Insane, Unlimited, Starlit Sky, and HP=2 for Easy, HP=4 for Standard. That'd be better.
  2. hmm...8 combo colours,okay. Some are quite confusing to recognise: there are 3 greyish and 2 reddish colours that are quite similar. Can you reduce them to only 4 colours? Makes no sense to use 8.

[Easy]
  1. 01:18:660 (1) - move it left a bit (105|139 for example) for better flow.

[Standard]
  1. 00:04:649 (3,4) - rip ds
  2. 00:12:561 (3,4) - i would recommend change rhythm here so it can be consistent with 00:17:836 (3,4,5) - which seems to fit song better.
  3. 00:52:946 (6,7) - stack them.You always use stack(e.g. 00:44:045 (3,4) - ) but now you don't do it,pretty weird.

[Hard]
  1. 00:11:408 (1,2) - inconsistent with 00:14:045 (1,2) - 00:16:682 (1,2) - and 00:19:320 (1,2) - . You'd better stack slider end imo
  2. 00:12:561 (1,2) - the stack here is pretty hard to play, and in other similar parts you also tried to avoid stacks such as 00:18:166 (2,3) - 00:15:199 (1,2) - .So i think you can stack (2) to 00:13:221 (3) -
  3. 00:41:078 (3,4) - stack them cuz it's slider end and you always stack.
  4. 00:56:078 (1,2,3) - play it and you should feel how weird the flow is.00:56:078 (1) - is going downwards but (2) is upward. 00:58:715 (1,2,3) - this is nice,follow this?
  5. 01:11:243 (3) - it's so casual lol make the shape better
    Also, 00:21:133 (1) - cancel NC?

[Insane]
  1. 00:02:671 (3,4,5) - the blunt angle here isn't a good choice imo
  2. 00:14:540 (2,5) - stack
  3. 00:19:814 (2,5) - stack (5) with (2) to keep consistency with 00:14:540 (2,5) -
  4. 00:48:825 (3,4,5) - anti-flow plus blunt angle won't flow well here,so i suggest you adjust them a bit.
  5. 00:58:715 (1) - #totally not a rlc copy

[Unlimited]
  1. 00:25:748 (2,1) - swap NC
  2. 00:40:254 (1,2) - ds is too big. This may be much better
  3. 01:05:144 (1,2,3,4,1) - use same ds. 0.55x 0.9x 0.6x and 0.9x is not a good idea, it is supposed to be a normal stream.
  4. 01:15:693 (1,2,3,4) - same
  5. 01:17:177 (1,2,3) - dont agree with the spacing here.Obviously there's a downbeat 01:17:836 - which you want to emphasise,so 01:17:671 (2,3) - should have a bigger jump than 01:17:177 (1,2) - .

[Starlit Sky]
  1. What's wrong with the stack liniency here,imo make all diffs consistent is better.
    It's a great diff, nothing else to say.

Nice set, especially the hardest diff with low cs. It's really well.
Call me back.
Lasse
osu! Alumni
3,648 posts
Joined June 2011
Topic Starter
Lasse

sahuang wrote:

M4M

Bold= Highly recommended
Red= Unrankable

[General]
  1. HP setting is not reasonable imo. From Standard to Hard it jumps from 3.5 to 6 which is bit too much. And HP7.5 for 5.55 stars map is also bit overdone. lowered for hard-highest diff, lower diffs kept same since I think 2.5 and 3.5 are fine.
    I'd suggest HP-0.5 for Hard, Insane, Unlimited, Starlit Sky, and HP=2 for Easy, HP=4 for Standard. That'd be better.
  2. hmm...8 combo colours,okay. Some are quite confusing to recognise: there are 3 greyish and 2 reddish colours that are quite similar. Can you reduce them to only 4 colours? Makes no sense to use 8. colorhax thing, clarified in irc

[Easy]
  1. 01:18:660 (1) - move it left a bit (105|139 for example) for better flow. curved 01:17:836 (4) - a bit more towards it instead

[Standard]
  1. 00:04:649 (3,4) - rip ds lol
  2. 00:12:561 (3,4) - i would recommend change rhythm here so it can be consistent with 00:17:836 (3,4,5) - which seems to fit song better. they both follow different things (vocal mainly/guitar mainly), the transition is not hard to understand as the rhythm still is simple so it works fine for gameplay too. would keep for at least a little more variety
  3. 00:52:946 (6,7) - stack them.You always use stack(e.g. 00:44:045 (3,4) - ) but now you don't do it,pretty weird. idk why this is spaced, fixed

[Hard]
  1. 00:11:408 (1,2) - inconsistent with 00:14:045 (1,2) - 00:16:682 (1,2) - and 00:19:320 (1,2) - . You'd better stack slider end imo yes
  2. 00:12:561 (1,2) - the stack here is pretty hard to play, and in other similar parts you also tried to avoid stacks such as 00:18:166 (2,3) - 00:15:199 (1,2) - .So i think you can stack (2) to 00:13:221 (3) - I actually only wanted to stack red ticks after sliders, this one was a mistake, fixed
  3. 00:41:078 (3,4) - stack them cuz it's slider end and you always stack. a
  4. 00:56:078 (1,2,3) - play it and you should feel how weird the flow is.00:56:078 (1) - is going downwards but (2) is upward. 00:58:715 (1,2,3) - this is nice,follow this? I know it plays bad :d was mainly for visuals, but I found something that still looks fine and plays better now
  5. 01:11:243 (3) - it's so casual lol make the shape better a bit
    Also, 00:21:133 (1) - cancel NC? kinda like the nc with the cymbal/finish and big jumps, it's similar to higher diffs

[Insane]
  1. 00:02:671 (3,4,5) - the blunt angle here isn't a good choice imo I think it plays okay, but I angled it slightly more to make it a bit more comfortable I guess
  2. 00:14:540 (2,5) - stack check it with stacking enabled/ingame :d http://i.imgur.com/j8s8Nvy.jpg it's a manual stack cause autostack breaks this with how it stacks on sliderends
  3. 00:19:814 (2,5) - stack (5) with (2) to keep consistency with 00:14:540 (2,5) - 00:20:309 (5) - has a way stronger vocal + transition into new part/building up intensity, so I'd like to keep a noticeable difference between them, even if base rhythm is same
  4. 00:48:825 (3,4,5) - anti-flow plus blunt angle won't flow well here,so i suggest you adjust them a bit. I've tested this a few times now and it feels totally fine to me with how people will most likely play 00:48:825 (3) - o: Also fits well with how the diff overall has some unusual movement caused by the slider/movement theme outside of the kiai
  5. 00:58:715 (1) - #totally not a rlc copy

[Unlimited]
  1. 00:25:748 (2,1) - swap NC whole 00:24:594 (1,1,2,1,2,1,2) - is comboed based on pattern, changing this would look weird and it works well with vocals
  2. 00:40:254 (1,2) - ds is too big. This may be much better yes, one of those spots were I go visuals>gameplay lol. fixed
  3. 01:05:144 (1,2,3,4,1) - use same ds. 0.55x 0.9x 0.6x and 0.9x is not a good idea, it is supposed to be a normal stream. yeah
  4. 01:15:693 (1,2,3,4) - same map is a few months old, idk why I did those anymore, still wobbly but consistently spaced
  5. 01:17:177 (1,2,3) - dont agree with the spacing here.Obviously there's a downbeat 01:17:836 - which you want to emphasise,so 01:17:671 (2,3) - should have a bigger jump than 01:17:177 (1,2) - . changing this just changed between snare or synth emphasis and since right now 01:17:671 (2,5) - have the biggest spacing I think people will get the snare emphasis for this pattern fine. also 01:16:847 (3,1,2,3,4) - just looks too good lol

[Starlit Sky]
  1. What's wrong with the stack liniency here,imo make all diffs consistent is better. it's there so the 1/2s stack perfectly as some patterns are designed around that, the difficulty (as the highest one in the set) was meant to have a few slightly more "challenging" to read patterns and the 1/2 stacks fit really well with that imo
    It's a great diff, nothing else to say.

Nice set, especially the hardest diff with low cs. It's really well.
Call me back.
thanks!
also renamed standard => normal and unlimited => extra to make it more recognizeable instead of using the ones from crossbeats
sahuang
2,294 posts
Joined December 2014
sahuang
We only did a few things in irc:
Renamed Standard to Normal and Unlimited to Extra
Some spacing issues in Insane

IRC
2016-08-26 00:10 Lasse: lol
2016-08-26 00:13 Lasse: i think I'll rename unlimited to extra though, cause it's a bit like a custom name since nobody uses the diffnames from that game
2016-08-26 00:14 sahuang: hmm so you wanna go for default? standard=normal and unlimited=extra?
2016-08-26 00:14 Lasse: yea, it doesn't matter for me anyways lol
2016-08-26 00:14 sahuang: lol
2016-08-26 00:15 sahuang: standard sometimes can be misunderstood as easy so yeah
2016-08-26 00:15 sahuang: better use normal
2016-08-26 00:16 Lasse: renamed
2016-08-26 00:20 sahuang: ACTION is editing [https://osu.ppy.sh/b/979245 yuikonnu - Hoshitachi no Melody [Insane]]
2016-08-26 00:21 sahuang: 00:19:814 (2,3,4,5,1) - still for this part, if you decide to keep then maybe move 00:20:474 (1) - down a bit?cuz this slider isn't emphasised now with similar ds.
2016-08-26 00:22 sahuang: 00:20:309 (5,1) - make it at least 2.3x or sth can work better
2016-08-26 00:23 Lasse: that works
2016-08-26 00:23 sahuang: 00:20:968 (2,2) - and i just noticed the random overlap here,could you stack them or sth? 
2016-08-26 00:24 sahuang: hard to start the stream if they are overlapped
2016-08-26 00:26 Lasse: oh https://imgur-archive.ppy.sh/d9xuH9e.jpg it's overlapped the same way the sliders overlap now and stream should be okay, you don't see the overlap for long wiht the ar
2016-08-26 00:27 sahuang: fine with it
2016-08-26 00:27 sahuang: i guess that's all,update and i will bub
2016-08-26 00:28 Lasse: nice, updated

Bubbled!
Xinely
5,014 posts
Joined April 2012
Xinely
damn so fast. placeholder from m4m

General :
- how about end the spinner 01:34:485 - here?

Easy :
- OD 2,5? OD 3 is a bit high for newbie i guess
- 00:05:309 - sampleset soft addition normal whistle? for consistency what you did in 00:02:671 -
- 00:09:924 (3) - i think it will be better with 2/1 slider here so just mapping the cymbals. honestly 00:10:254 - idk what is following for here
- 00:35:144 (1,2,3) - i think from here you can try http://puu.sh/qOUA2/8f2cbbf6dc.jpg. that sucks to skip 00:36:298 - qwq
- 00:38:441 (2,3,4) - same as above if you agree
- 00:47:836 (4) - this should be placed in 00:48:001 - due drum?
- 00:57:561 (1) - just flow taste, you can try 224,128 for diagonal flow
- 01:08:111 (1) - remove finish and use hitsound 00:57:561 (1) - has for consistency

Normal :
- 00:05:309 (4,5) - if you follow the melody (i guess guitar) here. you can try 1/2 slider repeat and then 00:05:968 - circle here
- 00:18:660 - i think you should keep map this. that is piano what you follow since begining from 00:11:408 - ;_;
- 00:43:386 (2,3) - try get them a bit closer.. its 1,15x spacing in stack gameplay
- 01:01:847 (4) - 236,104 will give better flow for me.. dunno how to explain qwq
- 01:04:485 (4) - if possible avoid use mininum low ds here (0,95x) one
- 01:20:474 (4,5) - same as 00:05:309 (4,5) -

Hard :
- 00:04:649 (1) - touch hp bar, 00:03:990 (2,3,1) - click them all and move to 96,208
- 00:09:594 (1,2) - imo 1,8x spacing is too far here. i dont see reason to jump. if you want a bigger spacing than your normal spacing then you can try 12,100
- 00:46:682 (4,1) - the jump is a bit too big for me when music isnt kiai which that strong. try make them a bit closer like (4) at 8,164?
- 01:03:166 (2) - aaa i think if you put circle on leftside like 16,76. flow will be smoother
- 01:04:485 (2,3) - just say for next your maps.. kind jumps like this.. flow is so harsh qwq
- confirmed copy pastaa after kiai for all diffs xd

Insane :
- 00:20:968 (2) - imo you can reduce the spacing like 64,144. a bit far too me like overemphasis the drum sound
- 00:38:935 (1,2,3,4) - weird rhythms for meee.. altho you follow vocal. imo that isnt time to use 3/4 slider for 4 sliders. drum is main sound here 00:39:759 - and this skipped. something like feel empty w/o follow it
- 00:53:605 (1,2,1,2) - hope you can nerf the jump, you just did triplet on previous so make 1/2 ones are easier to keep balance
- 01:05:226 (2) - 0,31x spacing is inconsistent here
- 01:26:572 (1) - suddenly curve the flow here feels weird. imo better keep it with straight flow. 248,160

Extra :
- 00:38:935 (1,2,3,4) - same as Insane
- 00:42:561 (1) - i think for keep the flow, ctrl+g works better
- 00:53:770 (2,2) - 192,288? you need to chill a bit after 1/4 jumps imo
- 01:10:336 (2) - 80,172 i guess for make the flow is same with 01:10:583 (1,2,3) -

Highest diff one :
- OD 9 HP 7 seems like killing players for me especially with small circles xD

call me back
Lasse
osu! Alumni
3,648 posts
Joined June 2011
Topic Starter
Lasse
Xinely

Xinely wrote:

damn so fast. placeholder from m4m

General :
- how about end the spinner 01:34:485 - here? feel like it gets too long and current and is already barely audible

Easy :
- OD 2,5? OD 3 is a bit high for newbie i guess yeah, also works better cause n-h od gap is a bit big
- 00:05:309 - sampleset soft addition normal whistle? for consistency what you did in 00:02:671 - done on all diffs
- 00:09:924 (3) - i think it will be better with 2/1 slider here so just mapping the cymbals. honestly 00:10:254 - idk what is following for here synth is so loud 00:10:254 - 2/1 feels to undermapped to me
- 00:35:144 (1,2,3) - i think from here you can try http://puu.sh/qOUA2/8f2cbbf6dc.jpg. that sucks to skip 00:36:298 - qwq
- 00:38:441 (2,3,4) - same as above if you agree
whole part is more mapped to those specific drums, so no change here
- 00:47:836 (4) - this should be placed in 00:48:001 - due drum? that works better, yes
- 00:57:561 (1) - just flow taste, you can try 224,128 for diagonal flow i think having 00:56:078 (3,4,1,2) - circular and then the wave changing flow is nicer
- 01:08:111 (1) - remove finish and use hitsound 00:57:561 (1) - has for consistency done on all diffs

Normal :
- 00:05:309 (4,5) - if you follow the melody (i guess guitar) here. you can try 1/2 slider repeat and then 00:05:968 - circle here but wantr cymbal on 00:06:133 (1) - clickable and using a circle jhust before would make tapping too dense for this part
- 00:18:660 - i think you should keep map this. that is piano what you follow since begining from 00:11:408 - ;_; can't really get a rhythm that still fits other other things and doesnt feel too dense here ; /
- 00:43:386 (2,3) - try get them a bit closer.. its 1,15x spacing in stack gameplay done
- 01:01:847 (4) - 236,104 will give better flow for me.. dunno how to explain qwq i get what you mean, rotated slider a bit instead. should be a little nicer now
- 01:04:485 (4) - if possible avoid use mininum low ds here (0,95x) one fixed
- 01:20:474 (4,5) - same as 00:05:309 (4,5) - same

Hard :
- 00:04:649 (1) - touch hp bar, 00:03:990 (2,3,1) - click them all and move to 96,208 actually had to move 00:03:166 (4,5,1,2,3,1,2,3,4,5,6,1) - because of how I structured this lol
- 00:09:594 (1,2) - imo 1,8x spacing is too far here. i dont see reason to jump. if you want a bigger spacing than your normal spacing then you can try 12,100
moved 00:09:265 (4) - to make it 1.6x should be fine with leniency
- 00:46:682 (4,1) - the jump is a bit too big for me when music isnt kiai which that strong. try make them a bit closer like (4) at 8,164? reduced by 0.2
- 01:03:166 (2) - aaa i think if you put circle on leftside like 16,76. flow will be smoother makes transition into 01:03:166 (2,3) - weird. 01:02:836 (1,2) - matters less because you can abuse leniency on the slider a bit
- 01:04:485 (2,3) - just say for next your maps.. kind jumps like this.. flow is so harsh qwq : v
- confirmed copy pastaa after kiai for all diffs xd well, patterns on lower diff are kinda similar cause rhythm is similar and using mainly ds gives you not much other opportunities with this structure lol

Insane :
- 00:20:968 (2) - imo you can reduce the spacing like 64,144. a bit far too me like overemphasis the drum sound doesn't feel that much cause of leniency on the long sliders + 00:20:474 (1,2,1,2) - overlap pattern is sos cute : (
- 00:38:935 (1,2,3,4) - weird rhythms for meee.. altho you follow vocal. imo that isnt time to use 3/4 slider for 4 sliders. drum is main sound here 00:39:759 - and this skipped. something like feel empty w/o follow it i get your point, but vocals are so strong here, it's fine in gameplay and I generally focus more on focals
- 00:53:605 (1,2,1,2) - hope you can nerf the jump, you just did triplet on previous so make 1/2 ones are easier to keep balance reduced them so sr dropped by 0.04, should be enough imo. the 1/4 repeat before already gives a small break
- 01:05:226 (2) - 0,31x spacing is inconsistent here how does this even happen, fixed
- 01:26:572 (1) - suddenly curve the flow here feels weird. imo better keep it with straight flow. 248,160 curved less, though I want to keep some change here for cymabl/end of song

Extra :
- 00:38:935 (1,2,3,4) - same as Insane yeah
- 00:42:561 (1) - i think for keep the flow, ctrl+g works better changed shape of 00:42:561 (1) - instead because ctrlg makes 1/4 spacing too big
- 00:53:770 (2,2) - 192,288? you need to chill a bit after 1/4 jumps imo they play like circles anyways and that would kill buildup : /
- 01:10:336 (2) - 80,172 i guess for make the flow is same with 01:10:583 (1,2,3) - makes the movement from the slider into it really akward :c mirrored flow works fine imo

Highest diff one :
- OD 9 HP 7 seems like killing players for me especially with small circles xD originally I wanted hp8 :d

call me back
thanks!
don't really want to change that extended slider pattern because vocals are so important there and with the first already skipping drums, skipping stornger drums on the last one doesn't feel that weird in gameplay imo
Xinely
5,014 posts
Joined April 2012
Xinely
Qualify
sahuang
2,294 posts
Joined December 2014
sahuang
gratz lasse <3
Kalibe
2,068 posts
Joined October 2013
Kalibe
Grats Lasse !!
Irohas
1,353 posts
Joined May 2014
Irohas
Oh finally, gratz!
Lasse
osu! Alumni
3,648 posts
Joined June 2011
Topic Starter
Lasse
00:22:287 - rip clap..
Okoayu
Nomination Assessment Team
4,998 posts
Joined May 2012
Okoayu

Lasse wrote:

00:22:287 - rip clap..
well he asked me to take it down for this so he can fix it
Lasse
osu! Alumni
3,648 posts
Joined June 2011
Topic Starter
Lasse
hi oko!

00:22:287 - clap added for all diffs, no other changes
hitsounding is fun
kill me
Kalibe
2,068 posts
Joined October 2013
Kalibe
dq for missing clap, hmmmmm.
Xinely
5,014 posts
Joined April 2012
Xinely
rebubble ~
sahuang
2,294 posts
Joined December 2014
sahuang
rebubble cuz can't qualify <3
Underforest
5,895 posts
Joined July 2015
Underforest
feelsbadman
inb4 gratz on ranking this mapset owo
-Atri-
3,049 posts
Joined March 2013
-Atri-
ＴＯＢＩＫＩＲＩ〜 ミ（ノ°∆°）ノ★
Xinely
5,014 posts
Joined April 2012
Xinely
Qua then
Lasse
osu! Alumni
3,648 posts
Joined June 2011
Topic Starter
Lasse
thanks again!
Kalibe
2,068 posts
Joined October 2013
Kalibe
regrats!
Reillia
1,164 posts
Joined August 2014
Reillia
i like this song gratz!
Sotarks
3,524 posts
Joined May 2014
Sotarks
gratzzz
bibilicu
3,578 posts
Joined October 2013
bibilicu
Congratz!
Mint
1,611 posts
Joined February 2013
Mint
was looking at this last night but now rank already zz

grats !!
Kalibe
2,068 posts
Joined October 2013
Kalibe
in extra



:v
Lasse
osu! Alumni
3,648 posts
Joined June 2011
Topic Starter
Lasse
oh
would anyone believe if I said this was intended
(hint: it isn't)

no idea how or when that happened,
it was probably there since first qualify but barely anyone plays the diff and it's still somehow playable so nobody noticed until now
going to fix whenever someone DQs this again lol
Okoayu
Nomination Assessment Team
4,998 posts
Joined May 2012
Okoayu
okay
pls doublecheck everything before pushing this again
Last edited by Okoayu , edited 2 times in total.
Lasse
osu! Alumni
3,648 posts
Joined June 2011
Topic Starter
Lasse
this map is starting to tilt me
fixed and doublechecked everything on extra
also checked all other diffs carefully again, no changes on those
Left
2,163 posts
Joined October 2014
Left
lol I thought it was intended

(and really smoothly played)
-Atri-
3,049 posts
Joined March 2013
-Atri-
Well, finally i don't need to rank my version if ranked it, woohoo~
Lasse
osu! Alumni
3,648 posts
Joined June 2011
Topic Starter
Lasse
It's still not ranked though lol
Also going to wait with trying to requalify this since there are already 2 maps of mine qualified right now and 3 at the same time seems a bit excessive
-Atri-
3,049 posts
Joined March 2013
-Atri-
no worries i have 62 years to wait
sahuang
2,294 posts
Joined December 2014
sahuang
rechecked, should be fine.
Xinely
5,014 posts
Joined April 2012
Xinely

sahuang wrote:

rechecked, should be fine.
Lasse
osu! Alumni
3,648 posts
Joined June 2011
Topic Starter
Lasse

Xinely wrote:

sahuang wrote:

rechecked, should be fine.
-Atri-
3,049 posts
Joined March 2013
-Atri-
The problems on memeing in somewhere


P i k u
189 posts
Joined June 2013
P i k u
Oh eeeeyy congrats /o/
Sotarks
3,524 posts
Joined May 2014
Sotarks
regraz!
Please sign in to reply.

New reply

0
58 / 75
/