Sotarks wrote:

Hi! M4M

Starlit Sky

1. what about decreasing stack to 0.9 ? it's built around current and perfectly rankable, kills some patterns
2. 00:13:056 (2) - the fact that this note is under this slider has 0 emphasis on the kick/voice beat we have here, makes me sad :C concept of the whole part to stack after this and fits with how calm it is + want to emphasize guitar on red ticks
3. 00:21:957 (1) - please this slider art for this kind of map doesn't fit at all, it's espacially for wubs pls. it's cute, just because other people use it for wub sounds doesn't mean I cant use it for cymbals : v
4. 00:45:529 (5,1) - you missed a note between those 2, like a triple would be nice here there is a slight sound, but triple feels too much and would make me have to space 00:45:529 (5) - or sth and kickslider doesnt feel right either so I undermapped it a bit
5. 00:54:594 (1) - i guess it's just me, but shapes like that fits only for wubs map..
6. 00:57:561 (3) - what about making a normal shape, like the one you're using is useless because it creates a anti-flow, and normaly you use that to create one, but yeah it's just imo. I changed it a little, but general shape stays since it needs to be like this to work better with 00:56:737 (1) - without creating overlaps or having the end point in a weird direction
7. 01:15:529 (5) - imo this would better if it was stacked, fits the structure differentiates it from 01:14:869 (2) - which has no vocal
8. 01:15:693 (1,2,3,4,1) - why are u decreasing the spacing here, feels random leads into slightly slower part

Unlimited

1. why just not rename it "extra", like only last diff can have a custom name, feels weird in your spread tbh. it's not custom. it's from the game the song is from, just like normal=standard. indicated difficulty wel enough imo
2. 00:13:056 (2) - U don't wanna stack it propelly, or is it intentional? my manual stacks even confuse me lol changed for now
3. 00:31:023 (1) - wub slider again aaa pretty sick wub song tbh
4. 01:14:540 (1) - nice vagina pls it's supposed to be part of flower shape http://i.imgur.com/LySCq70.jpg
   I really like this diff o/ same

Insane

1. 00:18:166 (2,3) - this patern is totally confusing, i'l really reconsider this patern tbh. maybe like 00:18:166 (2,3) - ctrl g those 2, and 00:18:496 (4) - ctrl g this one too, it could be an option, or w/e xd changed this to make it more readable even if is slightly inconsistent with before now
2. 00:45:529 (5,1) - missing this triple again here makes me sad
3. 00:58:715 (1) - aaaaa wub slider again

[bI like the creativity in this set![/b]
GL~

Momizi wrote:

hi,pay debt
[General]
the color of comboo 4 and 8 is a little strange for me，i know you use bright colour to make people notice quik part.and i dont konw how to adjust colours,just a fell ;W;,its nott very suit the BG.if its me,i maybe use some bright purple to suit the blue BG
might consider that, but I reallylike how they contrast the bg, they are only used very rarely as "highlights" so it works well imo
[Starlit Sky]
00:03:166 (6) - if dont have any special purpose，stack with 00:02:342 (2) - ？manually stacked 2 instead of this now it looks a little better
00:03:990 (2) - make the tail a liittle left to suit 00:03:496 (1) - for better blanket i think this is fine already http://i.imgur.com/XVveCsi.jpg o:
00:11:078 (2,3) - this distance on purpose，i think ds is better.. decreasing spacing as the volume fades and song goes into calm part
00:12:561 (1) - ctrl+G can fell better for me current is nicer
00:41:737 (1) - use colour 4 or 8 for sudden big jump color buildup light pink into bright colors for the fast sliders is better imo
01:25:089 (3,3) - how abourt speed up these two sliders good idea, done here and 00:09:924 (3,3) -
00:08:770 (3) - and 00:11:160 (3) - use normal whistle? sounds better for me would be too much normal w for this part
00:39:265 (2) - remove clap for soft part here and,you also not use clap behind (from 00:40:254 (1) - to 00:41:655 (3) - ) but there are still snares, removing claps wouldnt fit
00:50:144 (4) - move a liittle left for better flow from 3 or rotate some angle plays fine and 00:49:485 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - has a nice structure
00:59:787 (2) - use drum as 01:00:034 (1,2) - ？triple here emphasizes the piano, so soft
nice dif,i love this dif XD
[Unlimited]
00:21:957 (1) - seem a little fast,its seem harder than the highest dif oh this diff uses higher sv for most stuff, but also way lower cs
00:32:012 (4) - chage tail to flow 00:32:177 (1) - likehttps://osu.ppy.sh/ss/5317743 love this pattern too much and it's only kicksliders so visuals > other
00:42:891 (1,2,3) - i thought i open the stacikng，i think here stack can be better.. fixed manual stacks
00:49:979 (2,3) - flow not well,chage some angle of 3 https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/5317765 and dont foregt adjust 00:49:485 (1) - moved 3 a bit instead but it plays fine and look nicer xd
01:03:990 (1,3) - not blanket very well tried to fix
[Insane]
00:07:287 (1,2,1,2) - these four sounds strongger than 00:06:627 (2,3) - ,so i dont think reapeat is the best way same musical pattern so it fits well imo
00:16:353 (4,1) - umm,how to say,this overlap is fine to me,and maybe others will also say this overlap,just a notice
00:59:375 (1) -this slider dont look good,i mean the red anchor's part not well tried lol
[Hard]
I think hard dont need bright colours for NC,bright colours are litte abrupt I'd rather have my color usage consistent for those diffs and it seems fine to me o:
00:06:627 (2,3) - try to not touch,dont very like these think it's a cute pattern and the overlaps are not on a level that makes it hard to read
perrty good

nice song and nice map,cant mod very much,just shot a star instead,GL XD

moonlightleaf wrote:

[Starlit Sky]
00:05:638 (5,6) - stack is a little confused for me ,try this
https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/5288578 changes this pattern

00:48:825 (3,4) - Ctrl+g dont want a star here, this puts more emphasis on 00:48:990 (4,6) - drums

[Unlimited]

00:00:529 (1,2,3,4) - i perfer do as Sky-diff , this is the 2nd low ex , so would be better not to use these notes yes

00:40:254 (1,2) - confuse to click the 2 seems fine to me o:

In fact i am shit and can't understand the ex diff , so i try(force me to mod that , but i am really can't understand and give you more suggestion ,) so i give up the m4m , NO KD , sorry thanks anyways!

Hobbes2 wrote:

My end of the m4m from your queue ~

[General]

01:26:655 (1) - Why does the volume reduction for the spinner slow down at the end of it? It's kinda noticeable that it's not gradual for the last couple of volume reductions. fits the fading of the music better

[Easy]

00:50:474 (4,1) - I don't really like this dropoff. I think a position near x:280 y:116 (not exactly this, but this area) feels better to play. This would mean you'd have to adjust everything after it though, rip. it's fine movement and emphasizes the cymbal

01:12:726 (4) - maybe position this so the "v" part of the slider is exactly horizontal with 01:11:902 (3)? I suck at articulating lol tried

01:23:111 (4,1) - u prob dont have to fix this but its bugging me that these aren't exactly parallel :\ maybe make em both perfectly vertical? not supposed to be parallel, those are mirrored

01:26:737 (1) - not too big of a fan of spinners this close to the final hit circle in an ez, maybe move it to 01:26:902? snapepd to white tick

[Standard]

Wow this diff looks really good. No comments.

[Hard]

00:08:276 (2) - might be cool if this slider breaks the pattern and faces a different direction to emphasize the high pitched sound sure picth changes, but the musical pattern itself is repetitive so I'll keep gameplay the same way here

00:25:583 (4) - x:336 y:192 for better flow? Problem I have now is that it's closer to 3 than 1 but I don't think there's a reason for it be like that.

00:28:221 (4) - x:148 y:155 for a similar reason as above.
would break my jump on downbeat consistency for this part

00:31:023 (1,3) - this blanket would work better if the slider point circled in this picture was moved up a bit more. tried

01:23:441 (2) - Thing i mentioned above with making face a different direction to emphasize the high pitched sound.

Overall a fun difficulty, I liked it a lot.

[Insane]

00:08:276 (2) - At the risk of sounding like a broken record...yeah. Same thing I commented about this in the hard, and when this happens again later on in the map. s before

00:22:616 (3,1) - Might look better like this, so basically move 3 up a bit. kills consistent overlap spacing

01:01:682 (2) - Mostly me thinking out loud but this spacing reduction felt weird to play. I'm not sure how you'd fix it if you do choose to change it, though. similar to some other spacings + nice visuals

fun map!

Took a look at the other two diffs (unlimited and starlit sky) because I can't pass them, so I can't comment on stuff like spacing, but I can say that aesthetically I can't find any problems. Blankets and all that crap looked great.

Good luck! If you don't think my mod was helpful, It would be fine if you skipped a difficulty or two on my map.

MugiwaraSekai wrote:

hi m4m from your queue!

[Hard]

1. 00:32:177 (4,1) - I don't really think that it's necessary to make a 1/4 slider here. As they're nothing at 00:32:259, maybe make a triplet at 00:32:342 instead. but anyway I think it's still playable and fun to play. I just wanted to get noticed xd
   I agree that the first repeat is overmapped, but it's not clickable and fits fine so I'll keep it
2. 00:20:474 (1) - Emphasize a little bit more here would be better imo. Since the song radically change from here. To show that this and last part are totally different. yes
3. 00:26:902 (4,1) - What about consistency with 00:24:265 (4,5,1) - ? or maybe remove 00:24:512 (5) - I think it's better without. But the problem still the same, you should make it consistent. not needed, the drums might be similar, but it's not like the musically completely repeats, so having them a bit different is fine imo
4. 00:53:523 - Why you didn't map this while you did it at 00:53:193 (5) - they've same sounds imo. mainly for lower difficulty and a jump is nice too lol
5. 01:09:265 (1) - The change direction would emphasize it more and personally I think it would play better if you ctrl+g current break in flow gives fine emphasis and spacing/movement afterwards is nicer.

[Insane]

1. 00:45:529 (5,1) - It seems that you missed something between. Since it's same part that 00:34:979 (5,1) - I highly recommend to not skip. Make a triplet maybe ? similar to unlimited
2. 01:01:518 (1,2) - Try to space a bit like 01:12:067 (1,2) - for consistency. Cause it's too close maybe. If you want absolutely keep stack (2) on 01:00:693 (5) - 's tail you can simply move (1) further fixed 01:01:353 (7,1,2) - spacing, which also kinda fixed this

[Standard]

1. 00:13:221 (4) - I don't really get it why you put this here. You can't simply add a circle at 00:13:056 and remove (4). Cause I think it could have some misleadings because of that. (simply my opinion)
   and I see that you use this flow alot of times. So I think you have a reason to make that. But it would be simply more redable.
   It is fine to read, spaced like all other 1/1 gaps. this works way better with the rhythm of the song (besides drums maybe) and it fits well
2. 00:26:737 (6) - Stack better ? Or it's voluntary ? it's a simple manual stack lol
3. 01:19:814 (3) - Maybe you should copy/paste and ctrl+h 01:20:474 (4) - to make this more aesthetic ? changed the shape

[Unlimited]

1. 00:26:902 (5,1) - It seems like you skip something between both
2. 01:13:056 (3,1) - ^ undermapping those to focus on other things is totally fine

[]
Really sorry for this short mod. Overall it's really good. Have a star! Good luck!

KuranteMelodii wrote:

Ni ma de i rather have this version of Hoshitachi ranked instead, I really hate my version and it's so messy and terrible tbh I wanted to remap but i have no innovation orz

Ultra no sense modding incoming

• 
  [Unlimited]

1. 00:32:507 (1) - Ctrl+g, put them to about x:386/y:306 , otherwise the cursor movement will be jigged, Don't forget to not let them touch other objects after you changed it, also, too close
   
   How the cursor moved for the current pattern, notice the blue line means the movement didn't go smoothly

   
   Yeah i know it's meh, but at least it's clear enough
   that might play "nicer" but I find the abrupt flow break much better fitting to the music/emphasis and lvoer the current look of it
2. 00:39:594 (3) - You're ignoring the white tick, which have the drums to be in place, even it does follow the vocals perfectly, but ending up feeling that i have something missing there I get that, but the current pattern 00:38:935 (1,2,3,4) - is all mapped to vocals, so ignoring drum is okay. mappinf it here would feel rather weird with the others
3. 00:56:572 (2,2) - x:400/y:129 , same problem for jigged motion, and not pretty much supporting this kind of flow separation, and adjust the pattern later on I had a weird feeling about this for some time, remade this pattern
4. 01:07:122 (2,2) - ^, x:225/y:44 I actually think this one is fine cause the angle is sharper already

• 
  [Starlit Sky]

1. 00:06:957 (3,2,2) - Soooo... you desired to use some kind of "slider" gimmick there, Maybe unstack it for a little bit so it can read easily, from what i could see is not pretty much people could know there's another slider there
   
   :::

   
   Oh yeah, also adjust the position of 00:07:946 (1) - and 00:08:935 (4) - after you changed it
   due to the sv changes the sliderends are already unstacked http://i.imgur.com/tZZHPZT.jpg I think thats enough and people read it just fine so far
2. 00:12:232 (3) - Since this part is mapped the vocals mostly, what i could see if you place a slider there to let 00:12:232 - Clickable, but the stronger vocals is at 00:12:397 - , so i think you making the stronger vocals unclickable feels meh for me, I know you also make the the slider end vocal unclickable at 00:14:045 (1) - and 00:15:199 (1) - , But they feel better unlike the one i pointed out, and both slider head and slider end were have the same strength of vocals (But 3/4 and a circle is better though)
   
   :::

   
   Or use the same rhythm as 00:16:682 (1,2,3,4) -
   go sth wrong then, whole part is mapped to the instrument mainly, only focusing vocalsd when there is no piano/guitar stuff :d
3. 00:19:979 (3,4) - The stack isn't supporting anything, in this case, the first vocal is sightly stronger than the second, so slider is better at there it follows my stack pattern. 00:19:979 (3,4) - is more like a held vocal, so having a stop here and a jump on the clap after feels nicer and consistent with my patterning for this part
4. 00:20:968 (3) - Just my opinion though, you could move 00:20:309 (5) - and stack 00:20:968 (3) - since they're the same sound
   
   :::

   
   yeah the sound is similar, but in a different context/music transitions, so this wouldnt really do anything except using less of the playfield
5. 00:23:111 (1) - I know that you're blanketing 00:23:441 (2) - , but i think placing like this will play more smoothly
   
   ::

   
6. 00:39:594 (3) -Some problem i mentioned previous diffs ya
7. 01:22:122 (3,2,2) - same thing i mentioned before

That's all

2016-08-26 00:10 Lasse: lol
2016-08-26 00:13 Lasse: i think I'll rename unlimited to extra though, cause it's a bit like a custom name since nobody uses the diffnames from that game
2016-08-26 00:14 sahuang: hmm so you wanna go for default? standard=normal and unlimited=extra?
2016-08-26 00:14 Lasse: yea, it doesn't matter for me anyways lol
2016-08-26 00:14 sahuang: lol
2016-08-26 00:15 sahuang: standard sometimes can be misunderstood as easy so yeah
2016-08-26 00:15 sahuang: better use normal
2016-08-26 00:16 Lasse: renamed
2016-08-26 00:20 sahuang: ACTION is editing [https://osu.ppy.sh/b/979245 yuikonnu - Hoshitachi no Melody [Insane]]
2016-08-26 00:21 sahuang: 00:19:814 (2,3,4,5,1) - still for this part, if you decide to keep then maybe move 00:20:474 (1) - down a bit?cuz this slider isn't emphasised now with similar ds.
2016-08-26 00:22 sahuang: 00:20:309 (5,1) - make it at least 2.3x or sth can work better
2016-08-26 00:23 Lasse: that works
2016-08-26 00:23 sahuang: 00:20:968 (2,2) - and i just noticed the random overlap here,could you stack them or sth? 
2016-08-26 00:24 sahuang: hard to start the stream if they are overlapped
2016-08-26 00:26 Lasse: oh https://imgur-archive.ppy.sh/d9xuH9e.jpg it's overlapped the same way the sliders overlap now and stream should be okay, you don't see the overlap for long wiht the ar
2016-08-26 00:27 sahuang: fine with it
2016-08-26 00:27 sahuang: i guess that's all,update and i will bub
2016-08-26 00:28 Lasse: nice, updated

Xinely wrote:

damn so fast. placeholder from m4m

General :
- how about end the spinner 01:34:485 - here? feel like it gets too long and current and is already barely audible

Easy :
- OD 2,5? OD 3 is a bit high for newbie i guess yeah, also works better cause n-h od gap is a bit big
- 00:05:309 - sampleset soft addition normal whistle? for consistency what you did in 00:02:671 - done on all diffs
- 00:09:924 (3) - i think it will be better with 2/1 slider here so just mapping the cymbals. honestly 00:10:254 - idk what is following for here synth is so loud 00:10:254 - 2/1 feels to undermapped to me
- 00:35:144 (1,2,3) - i think from here you can try http://puu.sh/qOUA2/8f2cbbf6dc.jpg. that sucks to skip 00:36:298 - qwq
- 00:38:441 (2,3,4) - same as above if you agree
whole part is more mapped to those specific drums, so no change here
- 00:47:836 (4) - this should be placed in 00:48:001 - due drum? that works better, yes
- 00:57:561 (1) - just flow taste, you can try 224,128 for diagonal flow i think having 00:56:078 (3,4,1,2) - circular and then the wave changing flow is nicer
- 01:08:111 (1) - remove finish and use hitsound 00:57:561 (1) - has for consistency done on all diffs

Normal :
- 00:05:309 (4,5) - if you follow the melody (i guess guitar) here. you can try 1/2 slider repeat and then 00:05:968 - circle here but wantr cymbal on 00:06:133 (1) - clickable and using a circle jhust before would make tapping too dense for this part
- 00:18:660 - i think you should keep map this. that is piano what you follow since begining from 00:11:408 - ;_; can't really get a rhythm that still fits other other things and doesnt feel too dense here ; /
- 00:43:386 (2,3) - try get them a bit closer.. its 1,15x spacing in stack gameplay done
- 01:01:847 (4) - 236,104 will give better flow for me.. dunno how to explain qwq i get what you mean, rotated slider a bit instead. should be a little nicer now
- 01:04:485 (4) - if possible avoid use mininum low ds here (0,95x) one fixed
- 01:20:474 (4,5) - same as 00:05:309 (4,5) - same

Hard :
- 00:04:649 (1) - touch hp bar, 00:03:990 (2,3,1) - click them all and move to 96,208 actually had to move 00:03:166 (4,5,1,2,3,1,2,3,4,5,6,1) - because of how I structured this lol
- 00:09:594 (1,2) - imo 1,8x spacing is too far here. i dont see reason to jump. if you want a bigger spacing than your normal spacing then you can try 12,100
moved 00:09:265 (4) - to make it 1.6x should be fine with leniency
- 00:46:682 (4,1) - the jump is a bit too big for me when music isnt kiai which that strong. try make them a bit closer like (4) at 8,164? reduced by 0.2
- 01:03:166 (2) - aaa i think if you put circle on leftside like 16,76. flow will be smoother makes transition into 01:03:166 (2,3) - weird. 01:02:836 (1,2) - matters less because you can abuse leniency on the slider a bit
- 01:04:485 (2,3) - just say for next your maps.. kind jumps like this.. flow is so harsh qwq : v
- confirmed copy pastaa after kiai for all diffs xd well, patterns on lower diff are kinda similar cause rhythm is similar and using mainly ds gives you not much other opportunities with this structure lol

Insane :
- 00:20:968 (2) - imo you can reduce the spacing like 64,144. a bit far too me like overemphasis the drum sound doesn't feel that much cause of leniency on the long sliders + 00:20:474 (1,2,1,2) - overlap pattern is sos cute : (
- 00:38:935 (1,2,3,4) - weird rhythms for meee.. altho you follow vocal. imo that isnt time to use 3/4 slider for 4 sliders. drum is main sound here 00:39:759 - and this skipped. something like feel empty w/o follow it i get your point, but vocals are so strong here, it's fine in gameplay and I generally focus more on focals
- 00:53:605 (1,2,1,2) - hope you can nerf the jump, you just did triplet on previous so make 1/2 ones are easier to keep balance reduced them so sr dropped by 0.04, should be enough imo. the 1/4 repeat before already gives a small break
- 01:05:226 (2) - 0,31x spacing is inconsistent here how does this even happen, fixed
- 01:26:572 (1) - suddenly curve the flow here feels weird. imo better keep it with straight flow. 248,160 curved less, though I want to keep some change here for cymabl/end of song

Extra :
- 00:38:935 (1,2,3,4) - same as Insane yeah
- 00:42:561 (1) - i think for keep the flow, ctrl+g works better changed shape of 00:42:561 (1) - instead because ctrlg makes 1/4 spacing too big
- 00:53:770 (2,2) - 192,288? you need to chill a bit after 1/4 jumps imo they play like circles anyways and that would kill buildup : /
- 01:10:336 (2) - 80,172 i guess for make the flow is same with 01:10:583 (1,2,3) - makes the movement from the slider into it really akward :c mirrored flow works fine imo

Highest diff one :
- OD 9 HP 7 seems like killing players for me especially with small circles xD originally I wanted hp8 :d

call me back