Hey for my modding queue for NM!
00:11:617 (2,3,4) - I'd reverse 2 and 3 and move them to make the path look smooth, this is fine though
00:22:708 (2,4) - not quite perfectly blanketted but it's minor
01:02:890 (1,2,3,1) - move 3 for better rounding
01:29:254 (6,1,2) - ocd sense tell me alignment here
01:30:163 (2,3) - and here
01:45:981 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1) - why is this not a continuous stream? I don't think it really fits the music as well as a simple stream
02:38:617 (2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2) - again
03:13:254 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1) - again
04:33:981 (3,1,2,3,1,2,3,4,1) - ^
04:40:526 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1) - ^
04:58:526 (4,5,6,7,8) - fast for insane but I guess it's good for the music
LOVE the map a LOT. Don't mind my picky comments too much, I found little to say :p I don't find the streamjumps were fitting though, but they're well mapped and flow nicely, so you could keep them, reconsider only if more people mention it. I really hope this gets ranked, it's such a fun map
00:11:617 (2,3,4) - I'd reverse 2 and 3 and move them to make the path look smooth, this is fine though
00:22:708 (2,4) - not quite perfectly blanketted but it's minor
01:02:890 (1,2,3,1) - move 3 for better rounding
01:29:254 (6,1,2) - ocd sense tell me alignment here
01:30:163 (2,3) - and here
01:45:981 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1) - why is this not a continuous stream? I don't think it really fits the music as well as a simple stream
02:38:617 (2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2) - again
03:13:254 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1) - again
04:33:981 (3,1,2,3,1,2,3,4,1) - ^
04:40:526 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1) - ^
04:58:526 (4,5,6,7,8) - fast for insane but I guess it's good for the music
LOVE the map a LOT. Don't mind my picky comments too much, I found little to say :p I don't find the streamjumps were fitting though, but they're well mapped and flow nicely, so you could keep them, reconsider only if more people mention it. I really hope this gets ranked, it's such a fun map