M4M
00:11:252 (7,8) - make this double more readble?
00:53:635 (1,2,3,4,5) - more space i guess.
01:52:240 (3,4) - make space between notes more. All pattern will be more aesthetical IMO
02:01:659 (1,2,3,1,2,3) - close sliders IMO
02:27:211 (3) - no needed note cuz of no beat
02:31:135 (2,3) - same as 01:52:240 (3,4)
02:44:914 (1,2) - make space here like here 02:45:263 (3,4) - or make both patterns more spacy to save ur idea.
02:48:228 (3,4) - dont think it's good flow way D:
03:13:170 (1,2,3,4,5) - more space i guess.
03:23:461 (2,3,4,1) - same
03:47:531 (5,6,1,2,3,4,5,6) - this pattern looks nice but mby snap not too close.
04:07:938 (2) - beat starts on red tick, when ur slider ended. guess in this way will be sounds better
04:34:798 (5,6,1) - bad flow way IMO
05:01:310 (3,4,1) - not overmapped?
05:08:112 (7,8) - notes too close again D:
thats all.
Finally: map very awesome, looks rly smart. GL!
Sory for my bad english.
00:11:252 (7,8) - make this double more readble?
00:53:635 (1,2,3,4,5) - more space i guess.
01:52:240 (3,4) - make space between notes more. All pattern will be more aesthetical IMO
02:01:659 (1,2,3,1,2,3) - close sliders IMO
02:27:211 (3) - no needed note cuz of no beat
02:31:135 (2,3) - same as 01:52:240 (3,4)
02:44:914 (1,2) - make space here like here 02:45:263 (3,4) - or make both patterns more spacy to save ur idea.
02:48:228 (3,4) - dont think it's good flow way D:
03:13:170 (1,2,3,4,5) - more space i guess.
03:23:461 (2,3,4,1) - same
03:47:531 (5,6,1,2,3,4,5,6) - this pattern looks nice but mby snap not too close.
04:07:938 (2) - beat starts on red tick, when ur slider ended. guess in this way will be sounds better
04:34:798 (5,6,1) - bad flow way IMO
05:01:310 (3,4,1) - not overmapped?
05:08:112 (7,8) - notes too close again D:
thats all.
Finally: map very awesome, looks rly smart. GL!
Sory for my bad english.