CookieBite wrote:
Hello there, from my modding queue!
[Dynamic Congeniality]
00:21:936 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - the curve is not good enough fixed
01:14:262 (1) - ugly? hmm...
01:15:657 (5) - ^ will consider these with some more opinions, this mod is fresh and i dont have too many opinions on these shapes yet
01:18:971 (2) - make it straight? sure c:
03:39:378 (1,2) - improve blanket it actually wasn't the blanket it was just the direction of the slider xD, in any case i tried my best to fix both ><
03:42:169 (1,2) - ^ ^
05:35:287 (1) - wow slider art AWH YE MADAFAKA WE GOT THE TREBLE AS LONG AS YOU GOT THE BASS
srs I'm bad at modding extra diff.
great map for me. kudosu +1 O WAOW LUK A STAR <3 (ノ´ヮ´)ノ*:・゚✧
gl with your map! yours as well!
THANKS FOR MOD EXCLAMATION POINT !111!!1!11!!!1PlasticMemor wrote:
my mod will not be good
your mapping is godly ♥⃛( ❛ั◡˜ ๑)
check AImod, alot of things are not snapped thanks for checking lol, i suppose what happened when i fixed timing at the end (all hail snover) is the last control point got deleted, it was slower SV so when it got deleted the sliders were a bit fast.
01:42:692 (3) - move this down a little by like 6 grid boxes the stack isn't very noticeable in play thanks to AR, but if another mod mentions ill fix
01:48:971 (6) - this dips down too low emphasized the synth since its before stream section and this is something i want emphasized, but i can see where you're coming from... ill mention this to future testplayers and ask if the spike is too nasty
01:52:459 (4,5,6,7) - these could be 2 sliders im leaning towards making all of these sections the same, 00:33:797 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - 01:51:936 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - 02:31:006 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - 02:42:169 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - 02:53:331 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - 05:04:494 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - 05:07:285 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - 05:21:238 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - .... as it stands, slow sections start with a slider and faster sections start with hit circles, but these are awkward sections which is why ill probably map them to be more modder friendly
04:19:843 (1) - move this slider a little bit further from 9 actually just decided to make the shape less awkward all together xD, should definitely be fixed now thx
05:35:280 (1) - slider art is on point <3
LOL 777 circlesHonestE wrote:
btw length is 5:35 but stars is 5.36 change that please...
looks more dank than before- Yoshimaro - wrote:
omfg im a legend
THKNAS FRO DOM!!!Alveryn wrote:
hello from mod queue I will only mod errors and metadata today and not mapping at all this is too long for me sorry
MUMEI WAIFU IS PUREST WAIFU
[General/Metadata]fixed c:
- HP is too low IMO, 7 is reasonable :c
- Tags: Your tags are "Lime,Kankitsu,Harmony,GroundbreakinG,gdbg,kawaiicore,onsen,no,chikara,BMS" which are separated by comma's. That's unrankable. Separate all the words with spaces. (So weird though they don't show up as commas in beatmap info page, but beware BN's/QAT can be picky) o sry, used to websites that use commas thanks
- Combo Color 1 and Color 3 are the same, if you want to re-use a combo I think you should use the drop-down NC menu to select it. See here: http://puu.sh/oT9cp/9bff0794f2.jpg uh what
- soft-slidertick3.wav is never used, this can make the map unrankable. fixed c:
- Tags (again): Remove "lime" tag as it's the artist, no need for the tag. Same for "harmony" tag etc... And remove following tags... "onsen" "no" "chikara" "kankitsu" ok fixed, also just wondering because in the album it said that onsen no chikara did the guitars so i put them in but fixed
- Source: BMS (This is important!) !!!!!
- Artist: I checked for artist name, and it turns out Lime and Kankitsu are the same person but different personas, weirdly though he sometimes uses Lime as artist name (https://soundcloud.com/kanki2/lime-smil ... um=twitter) and sometimes he uses Kankitsu (https://soundcloud.com/kanki2/summerwind), but for this song in particular he uses "Lime / Kankitsu" as if it's a collaboration, so that should be Artist name.
ok using "Lime / Kankitsu", this is correct right? sometimes I see "Lime & Kankitsu"I'm going to use "Lime & Kankitsu"- Song title should be: Harmony (Long ver.) fixed C:
- Add tags: "G2R2014" "kanki2"
If you feel like you need to confirm, here are some of the sources:https://twitter.com/_kanki2 - Artist Twitter (Kankitsu)
https://twitter.com/_kankitsu Artist Twitter (Lime)
https://soundcloud.com/kanki2 - Artist Soundcloud (Shared)
http://d.hatena.ne.jp/d_c0836/ - Artist's Blog (Lime)
https://soundcloud.com/kanki2/harmonylo ... um=twitter - Song Soundcloud and some song info
http://www.gdbg.tv/2014/ - Album Metadata
http://kanki2.net/bms.html - Lime's BMS site (Notice he doesn't use "(Long Ver.)" for his harmony difficulty for BMS)
THX 4 MOD FAMBOLINI HAVE SOM SPIC KDOSDUDUUsernametwo wrote:
Hello, I'm new to modding, but I hope this will be helpful: hi new to modding, im yoshi
[Metadata]added
- Artist name should be "Lime", as it's listed on the website, on the mp3 from the album download, and on the BMS.
- If you do that, "Kankitsu" should be put back into the tags.
SPOILERand for the lime/kankitsu thing: Lime is for BMS, and Kankitsu is for non-BMS works (CDs and web releases). Since this song was for BMS, the name used is Lime. this was addressed by the mod just before you, Alveryn. it appears that Lime occasionally produces under the name Kankitsu but for this song in particular he used both as a collab with himself, which confused me because i downloaded the song from the same place in the screenshot xD idk ill leave it how it is and when a BN checks ill use what is considered correct (although i think it is supposed to be Lime & Kankitsu)- Song title is fine.
- BMS is in the source, so it should be removed from the tags. makes sense
- The team name for this song in the G2R2014 event was "Brilliant Melodies". You might want to add that to the tags.
[Circles] click them C:
00:12:344 (5) - Instead of a 1/2 slider, I would replace this with a 1/4 slider and a circle, which mirrors (1,2) instead of (2,3). The spacing puts more emphasis on the snare at 00:12:517, while still following the voice hey thats actually pretty damn good, nic
00:46:704 (1) - place on top of (2); it's easier to read (in the current position, it feels like the time between (1,2) is half as short) going to leave it, also the stream blankets this note
01:07:285 (6) - slider should be extended to replace the current (7) as it fits the music better. same
01:53:419 (1) - spinner should end at 01:57:517 had it like that before untiL FaQT XexXXAR TLodd mE3 T2 chAENG THE CFKUIGN TRMINGN
01:58:564 - if you did ^, add a circle here, at the center. k
02:06:238 (2,3) - replace with one slider, similar to (1), to follow the background noise more effectively i like it
02:07:285 (5) - replace with two 1/4 sliders; it's easier to move into the stream that way i like it
02:44:959 (1,2,1,2) - place second (2) on top of the first (1). the jumps should expand with each combo in this area, instead of the first three combos being the same shortened the distance of 02:44:959 (1,2) - but not changing combo (changed from 1.0 to .8, originally 02:44:610 (4,1,2,1,2) - were 1.0)
02:45:831 (2) - (continued from ^) move down by about 9 small-sized grid squares. X
02:46:006 (1,2) - (continued from ^) ctrl+g; in the end, it should look something like this (combo edited for clarity)Y02:52:459 (1,2,3) - (2) should be spaced out more personally i agree with this, i think i changed it for an earlier mod but i like this a bit more
03:06:238 (1) - place on top of (2)Z
05:41:430 - shorten the pretty treble clef slider by 1/8, then add a thing here now i know my abc's (when i play it in 1/16th 25% it sounds correct, check your offset? idk)
Oh, and, good luck on ranking this.
that was fucking dense lol ill fix map tomorrow im dead tired todayKaifin wrote:
okDynamic Congeniality
- 00:03:099 (1,2,3,1,2,3) - these things in all of their instances should be spaced higher, it feels cramped as is (something like this http://puu.sh/oWV5g/388d8f169c.jpg) its so cramped that its awkward to play
- 00:04:843 (2,3,4,5,6,7) - why this shaped so ugly compared to the others
- 00:11:297 (7,8,1) - space this out so its even with the rest, the stacking makes it uneven, and or just space it more so its completely separate from the pattern
- 00:19:843 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - i dont really like the flow of this pattern, seems weird
- 00:22:634 (1,2,3) - kind of unclear spacing, they look like they're kicks when they're not, space more or less for better emphasis?
- 00:35:192 (1) to 00:43:564 (1) - your hitsounding is so weird and jarring lol find way to make more natural? maybe lower introduction volume? it comes out of nowhere
- 00:36:413 (5,6,7,8,9,10) - would recommend you rework this rhythm in all of its instances, its not following anything in particular and jumps instruments, the one that follows it is a lot better, you're also skipping potential 5 bursts from the drums in this kiai section, listen carefully to the music and fix yo rhythm
- 00:42:779 (8,9,10) - clean up this portion of your stream shape, the rest of the stream is fine these three notes ruin it though
- 00:47:052 (2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9) - theres something slightly off about this
- 00:49:145 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16) - much better
- 00:51:936 (1,2,3) - increase spacing cuz its the same as your 1/2 in about 2 seconds here 00:55:948 (1,2,3,4) -
- 00:54:727 (1,2) - same
- 00:58:913 (4) - wtf is this stack lol also maybe 1/1 and circle on red tick would be better
- 01:01:704 (4) - same, also this one would be more intuitive if it went the other way
- 01:04:145 (3,4) - i see what you're doing here but its hot aids tbh, bigger spacing for farther apart on the timeline notes and smaller for closer = readable
- 01:06:587 (2,3,4,5) - would be better as two 1/2 sliders because this is so emphasized with these fuking hitsounds and the noise is quiet and not 4 circle clickable imo
- 01:06:587 (2,3,4,5) - also this is the same spacing as your 1/1 : /
- 01:10:076 (4) - other way
- 01:14:262 (1,2,3,4) - ok so the 1 slider end here should be clickable its the most emphasized note in the whole bar
- 01:17:052 (1) - same
- 01:28:913 (1,2) and 01:29:436 (7,8) - shape is fuckd
- 01:29:610 (1,2,3) - same as before
- 01:30:308 (3,1) - theres a triplet in here
- 01:31:704 (4) - emphasis
- 01:32:052 (5) - less emphasis
- 01:33:448 (5,6) - 5 should be the emphasized one here, not 6
- 01:34:494 (4) - emphasis
- 01:35:192 (1) - emphasis
- 01:37:983 (1) - ^
- 01:38:680 (4) - ^
- 01:40:773 (1,2,3,4) - wat is this pattern/rhythm? just do this lol: http://puu.sh/oWW2P/745b7fe57b.jpg
- 01:41:297 (3) - clap on slider end????????? y
- everything i said about emphasis applies to this section and sections similar following comb through all of it and make sure the emphasis is on the snare
- 01:52:459 (4,5,6,7,8) - really dont like this pattern, i would rework
- 01:53:419 (1) - theres interesting rhythm during this spinner, and directly after it where there is no notes, why not map p ed
- 01:58:913 (1,2) - 1/2s
- 02:07:983 (5,9) - might be better with Ncs but meh
- 02:09:204 (4,1,2,3) - really really misleading spacing, space it out more
- 02:19:145 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1) - move up to here or similar for consistency http://puu.sh/oWWii/5d79fbd346.jpg
- that stream section is pretty good i like the shapes
- 02:25:424 (1,3) - aesthetic death of map the angles
- 02:27:169 (2,3,4,5,6) - holy this rhythm do this: http://puu.sh/oWX0Y/4bd3039c9f.jpg
- 02:30:657 (4,5) - why circles instead of 1/2 slider?
- 02:31:006 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - wat i think this was a misclick or somethin but pls fix pattern
- 02:37:110 (3) - dont use red tick 1/2 sliders in this song theres like 0 places where its applicable
- 02:40:250 (5,6,7) - is there a triplet sound here? cant hear it
- 02:42:169 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - fix like all of these doubles patterns so they're spaced a lot better tbh
- 02:44:959 (1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2) - either make it expand slowly, or have them all be the same spacing and put the emphasis on the first notes of the 1/2s, your choice but right now this is both and it doesnt work
- 02:46:878 (3) - no
- 02:51:238 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,1) - holy good stream shape
- 02:53:070 (3) - HOLY ITS ON THE BLUE TICK, spacing is bad on pattern anyways
- 02:53:331 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - me irl
- 03:11:471 (1,2,3) and 03:15:483 (1,2,3,4) - same shit as before with the spacing yo
- 03:26:820 (1,2,3) - this looks really bad ngl please change
- 03:29:610 (3) - lol is this one different from the other ones or something this one looks better than all the others
- 03:32:052 (2,3,1,2,3) - cool idea but bad angle on the triangle, specifically blue 2 to blu 3
- 03:33:448 (4) - make even spacing so its clearly 1/1
- 04:09:204 (2) - all the slow part before this is so much better than the other slow part just thought i'd let you know
- 04:19:145 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - cool idea execute the stream shape better though while keeping it going down in spacing
- 04:32:052 (4) - not like this
- 04:39:901 (3) - booooooooooo red tick slider
- 04:47:052 (4) - the emphasis was goin ok until you bopped in this triple slider pattern stuff
- 04:51:238 (4,6,7,1) - why have them touch like that when you can just like space out the 671 more
- 04:53:331 (1,2,3,4) - fix this rhythm 2
- 05:02:750 (4,1) - this flow is very bad
- 05:04:494 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - me irl
- 05:07:285 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - HOLY THIS PATTERN IS ALMOST a good 1 with doubles but then 8 ruins it lol
- 05:13:390 (3) - no
- 05:21:762 (3,4,5,6,7) - thats good enough you want more emphasis on the 7 tho
- 05:24:552 (3) - no
- 05:30:133 (3) - no
- 05:35:280 (1) - stellar meme
not really that thorough, you should really get someone to go over your linear flow with you because holy its everywhere and its really jarring, i only pointed out like 1 really extreme linear flow example
good stream shapes though, better than your last map i saw
gl !
- me from 2 fucking weeks ago- Yoshimaro - wrote:
that was fucking dense lol ill fix map tomorrow im dead tired today
Kaifin wrote:
ok rammusDynamic Congeniality
- 00:03:099 (1,2,3,1,2,3) - these things in all of their instances should be spaced higher, it feels cramped as is (something like this http://puu.sh/oWV5g/388d8f169c.jpg) its so cramped that its awkward to play doubled the spacing
- 00:04:843 (2,3,4,5,6,7) - why this shaped so ugly compared to the others :C fix
- 00:11:297 (7,8,1) - space this out so its even with the rest, the stacking makes it uneven, and or just space it more so its completely separate from the pattern fixed spacing to deal with stacks
- 00:19:843 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - i dont really like the flow of this pattern, seems weird rammus
- 00:22:634 (1,2,3) - kind of unclear spacing, they look like they're kicks when they're not, space more or less for better emphasis? spaced to the metronome, on the 4th however the white noise that has been "building up pressure" so to speak pops
- 00:35:192 (1) to 00:43:564 (1) - your hitsounding is so weird and jarring lol find way to make more natural? maybe lower introduction volume? it comes out of nowhere changed 00:34:843 (1,2,3,4) - to drums to prepare but tbh i need so much help hitsounding this hoYl
- 00:36:413 (5,6,7,8,9,10) - would recommend you rework this rhythm in all of its instances, its not following anything in particular and jumps instruments, the one that follows it is a lot better, you're also skipping potential 5 bursts from the drums in this kiai section, listen carefully to the music and fix yo rhythm ill find something
- 00:42:779 (8,9,10) - clean up this portion of your stream shape, the rest of the stream is fine these three notes ruin it though fix (?)
- 00:47:052 (2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9) - theres something slightly off about this rammus
- 00:49:145 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16) - much better rammus
- 00:51:936 (1,2,3) - increase spacing cuz its the same as your 1/2 in about 2 seconds here 00:55:948 (1,2,3,4) - volume and pitch
- 00:54:727 (1,2) - same same
DAY 1 INTERMISSION CUS LAZY FUCK. I WILL CONTINUUUEEEEEEEEEEE...meh whenever i get around to it lol- 00:58:913 (4) - wtf is this stack lol also maybe 1/1 and circle on red tick would be better
- 01:01:704 (4) - same, also this one would be more intuitive if it went the other way
- 01:04:145 (3,4) - i see what you're doing here but its hot aids tbh, bigger spacing for farther apart on the timeline notes and smaller for closer = readable
- 01:06:587 (2,3,4,5) - would be better as two 1/2 sliders because this is so emphasized with these fuking hitsounds and the noise is quiet and not 4 circle clickable imo
- 01:06:587 (2,3,4,5) - also this is the same spacing as your 1/1 : /
- 01:10:076 (4) - other way
- 01:14:262 (1,2,3,4) - ok so the 1 slider end here should be clickable its the most emphasized note in the whole bar
- 01:17:052 (1) - same
- 01:28:913 (1,2) and 01:29:436 (7,8) - shape is fuckd
- 01:29:610 (1,2,3) - same as before
- 01:30:308 (3,1) - theres a triplet in here
- 01:31:704 (4) - emphasis
- 01:32:052 (5) - less emphasis
- 01:33:448 (5,6) - 5 should be the emphasized one here, not 6
- 01:34:494 (4) - emphasis
- 01:35:192 (1) - emphasis
- 01:37:983 (1) - ^
- 01:38:680 (4) - ^
- 01:40:773 (1,2,3,4) - wat is this pattern/rhythm? just do this lol: http://puu.sh/oWW2P/745b7fe57b.jpg
- 01:41:297 (3) - clap on slider end????????? y
- everything i said about emphasis applies to this section and sections similar following comb through all of it and make sure the emphasis is on the snare
- 01:52:459 (4,5,6,7,8) - really dont like this pattern, i would rework
- 01:53:419 (1) - theres interesting rhythm during this spinner, and directly after it where there is no notes, why not map p ed
- 01:58:913 (1,2) - 1/2s
- 02:07:983 (5,9) - might be better with Ncs but meh
- 02:09:204 (4,1,2,3) - really really misleading spacing, space it out more
- 02:19:145 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1) - move up to here or similar for consistency http://puu.sh/oWWii/5d79fbd346.jpg
- that stream section is pretty good i like the shapes
- 02:25:424 (1,3) - aesthetic death of map the angles
- 02:27:169 (2,3,4,5,6) - holy this rhythm do this: http://puu.sh/oWX0Y/4bd3039c9f.jpg
- 02:30:657 (4,5) - why circles instead of 1/2 slider?
- 02:31:006 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - wat i think this was a misclick or somethin but pls fix pattern
- 02:37:110 (3) - dont use red tick 1/2 sliders in this song theres like 0 places where its applicable
- 02:40:250 (5,6,7) - is there a triplet sound here? cant hear it
- 02:42:169 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - fix like all of these doubles patterns so they're spaced a lot better tbh
- 02:44:959 (1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2) - either make it expand slowly, or have them all be the same spacing and put the emphasis on the first notes of the 1/2s, your choice but right now this is both and it doesnt work
- 02:46:878 (3) - no
- 02:51:238 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,1) - holy good stream shape
- 02:53:070 (3) - HOLY ITS ON THE BLUE TICK, spacing is bad on pattern anyways
- 02:53:331 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - me irl
- 03:11:471 (1,2,3) and 03:15:483 (1,2,3,4) - same shit as before with the spacing yo
- 03:26:820 (1,2,3) - this looks really bad ngl please change
- 03:29:610 (3) - lol is this one different from the other ones or something this one looks better than all the others
- 03:32:052 (2,3,1,2,3) - cool idea but bad angle on the triangle, specifically blue 2 to blu 3
- 03:33:448 (4) - make even spacing so its clearly 1/1
- 04:09:204 (2) - all the slow part before this is so much better than the other slow part just thought i'd let you know
- 04:19:145 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - cool idea execute the stream shape better though while keeping it going down in spacing
- 04:32:052 (4) - not like this
- 04:39:901 (3) - booooooooooo red tick slider
- 04:47:052 (4) - the emphasis was goin ok until you bopped in this triple slider pattern stuff
- 04:51:238 (4,6,7,1) - why have them touch like that when you can just like space out the 671 more
- 04:53:331 (1,2,3,4) - fix this rhythm 2
- 05:02:750 (4,1) - this flow is very bad
- 05:04:494 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - me irl
- 05:07:285 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - HOLY THIS PATTERN IS ALMOST a good 1 with doubles but then 8 ruins it lol
- 05:13:390 (3) - no
- 05:21:762 (3,4,5,6,7) - thats good enough you want more emphasis on the 7 tho
- 05:24:552 (3) - no
- 05:30:133 (3) - no
- 05:35:280 (1) - stellar meme
not really that thorough, you should really get someone to go over your linear flow with you because holy its everywhere and its really jarring, i only pointed out like 1 really extreme linear flow example
good stream shapes though, better than your last map i saw
gl !