1. Fine.

1. I'd like to see 00:10:272 (1) - and 00:11:443 (2) - going opposed direction for a) consistency's sake and b) a more symmetrical flow. The same idea goes for 00:14:955 (2) - and 00:16:126 (2) - . (Sure)
2. 00:18:906 - I think the 1/4 beat midway through this slider has an essential beat that should not be skipped with a droplet, it lacks something. A soft slider with reverse arrow goes well at this point: http://puu.sh/kTuQn/b3263233f3.jpg
3. 00:19:345 (1,2,3,1,2,3,4,1) - , 00:22:418 (2,3,1,2,3,4,1) - , 00:24:760 (2,3,1,2,3,4,1) - Feels a little dull to have the same pattern 3 consecutive times. The first and second pattern should stay as they are since they go well with the symmetrical flow, but maybe you can make the 3rd one (00:24:760 (2,3,1,2,3,4,1) -) another way - not necessarily more difficult - to have more variety. An example: (Made some other changes to avoid monotonism)
   
   SPOILER

   
4. 00:30:613 (4,1) - , 00:31:053 (1,2) -, 00:33:394 (1,2) - , 00:35:735 (1,2) - I don't understand the very low distances between these. The music is so loud and still the distance is lower than any previous or subsequent pattern. You should emphasize the song at these points. (It's the calm part + lazy mapping)
5. 00:42:613 - Add some note or just make it a slider in connection with 00:42:760 (1) - to follow the vocals better.You can do the same at 00:37:931 - but not necessarily. (Made the first one a slider)
6. 00:50:955 (1,2) - Try something similar like this. It provides a better flow: (Looks good)
   
   SPOILER

   
7. 01:00:321 (1,2,3,4) - Really? For the Kiai....? I don't understand... This: (It can also work like this. I used that kind of pattern on Salad and Platter, and I wanted to add a bit of variety)
   
   SPOILER

   
8. 01:09:686 (1,2,3,4) - ^
9. 01:19:638 (2) - What is the point of that curve in that slider anyway? You don't really feel that direction in gameplay, it just looks like a normal vertical slider there, so to stress it better use a shape like this: (Added a repetition instead according to previous suggestions)
   
   SPOILER

   

1. 00:05:004 (3,1) - I guess this could be a little dash at least, goes well with the finish. (There's already a direction change, didn't want to complicate it that much)
2. 00:18:760 (2,3,1) - Interesting idea but it looks a little awkward to play. Try this, guarantee you it will keep the same level of difficulty but better to read: (Okay)
   
   SPOILER

   
3. 00:31:053 (1,2) - Currently this sounds wrong somehow. The following timeline fits the music better (For reference: (3) starts at 00:31:053 - ): (It doesn't sound that bad. The gap is intentional for the little dash)
   http://puu.sh/kTxcH/bf12ccd52a.jpg or http://puu.sh/kTxha/27bcff3f0f.jpg
4. 00:51:687 (4,1) - Potential part for a dash. (There's a dash already, much more distance isn't necessary imo)
5. 00:53:150 - If applied previous point add note here to connect it to 00:53:296 (1) - with another dash, for consistency.
6. 01:00:321 (1,2,3,4) - , 01:09:687 (1,2,3,4) - This could have a few dashes, too. It's the kiai afterall. (I didn't want to make it that complicated for a Salad. It's already "tricky" with the constant direction changes)
7. 01:12:028 (1,2) - I think this should not have a dash instead. Reduce distance that it's possible without a dash because I see no point on it with the current music. (Done)
8. 01:19:931 (3,1) - , 01:20:955 (3,1) - , 01:22:126 (3,1) - Really just a suggestion: This is maybe a little tricky but some tiny dashes don't hurt these, just be careful you won't exaggerate. (I tend to exaggerate, so better to keep it untouched)

1. 00:05:004 (3,1) - Could be a little hyper. (I'd like to keep an easy intro, and therefore the little dash)
2. 00:07:638 (1,2) - Again both of these feel like normal vertical sliders. Do this instead: (I don't feel much difference tbh)
   
   SPOILER

   
3. 00:09:979 (1) - Do it similar as on the image below to make it more consistent with 00:11:004 (7,1) - and 00:11:882 (3,1) - : (I'd like to take not so many risks with that little stream and its final dash :S)
   
   SPOILER

   
4. 00:18:028 (7,1) - Can you decrease distance just a bit... I mean you should keep the HDash but smaller. The move you gotta do is kinda rough. I say this also because the music is getting lower than it's still at 00:21:540 (4,1) - . So basically it makes sense. (Sure)
5. 00:26:223 (4,1) - Ok why is there no HDash here anymore? That came really surprising. (OOOOOOOOPS)
6. 00:30:613 (3) - I think if you center this between (2) and (4) it looks cleaner. (x312 on grid level 3) (Yup)
7. 00:32:955 (3) - ^
8. 00:36:467 (3,1) - Not mandatory but still potential place for another HDash. (It's pretty much covered with the dash imo)
9. 00:37:345 (3) - Move the slider a bit more to the left, please. Again it's a little awkward to play since I think there is no reason to do that quite strong direction change, regarding the vocals. If anything the distance should be higher on 00:36:906 (1,2) - and/or 00:37:345 (3,4) - . (That'd increase drastically the difficulty of that section, and the vocals aren't that strong on (3,4))
10. 00:51:687 (3,1) - , 00:52:857 (3,1) - These two should have some HDashes, too. First it's a good prelude for the Kiai, secondly it fits the Finish hitsounds. (Tried it, but it looks somehow extreme so I'd rather keep the simple dashes)
11. 01:00:321 (1,2,3) - Feels very similar as in the Salad, try implement HDashes between some of these notes. For example: (WHAT no way o.o)
    
    SPOILER

    
12. 01:04:272 (2) - Uhh, again I think this (2) is not centered between (1) and (3), but should be. Feels unclean otherwise.
13. 01:09:686 (1,2,3) - Same as I said at 01:00:321 (1,2,3) - , could have some more action.

1. 00:11:150 (1) - Has to be more curvy to get a rebound effect for the ryuuta. What's really weird though: You used the same slider shape as 00:09:979 (1) - but the slider looks different in gameplay. Ehh... How? (Blame the random droplet creation. Changed)
2. 00:14:370 (5) - Try the following, I like the idea of having a bit of more challenge here, and it plays relatively fluid as well: (Looks good)
   
   SPOILER

   
3. 00:19:053 (5) - ^Same as above, just symmetrical.
4. 00:37:492 (4,5,6) - Select them all together and move the pattern to x32 or something around that. (Done)
5. 00:41:735 (1,2) - Another awkward part to play. Whilst (1) has a quite strong movement, suddenly (2) requires a very soft movement and this goes a bit against the flow. Try this (maybe): (Changed)
   
   SPOILER

   
6. 00:56:077 (2) - For some variety use single notes (the Hyper at 00:56:662 (4,1) - feels much better that way, too): (I'd like to keep the slow slider for this part, since it feels more natural before the kiai)
   
   SPOILER

   
7. 01:00:028 (4,1) - HDash, just make sure the subsequent pattern is still catchable (I find it with dashing before more difficult actually) (I think I changed it with the previous mod. I'd like to keep a soft transition before entering those "awkward" sliders. Reduced the distance instead)
8. 01:06:174 (1,2) - I dont really understand this HDash, what does it follow? The vocals are not so 'crazy' here, hence feels out of place. (I'm a lazy copypasta mapper lol I hope it looks better now)
9. 01:11:443 (3) - Move this slider to the left, feels awkward after the previous pattern to dash this again, give me a break lol. (ayayaya)

1. 01:20:516 (2) - Really minor, but you could replace this with three circles like you have at 01:22:857 (2,3,4) so that your combos alternate repeat slider and triplet - I feel it improves the consistency, and it allows you to avoid the repetition of having the two 1/2 repeat sliders 01:19:638 (2,2) oriented the exact same way right after each other (Not really necessary imo)

1. 00:38:809 (2,1) - 00:43:492 (2,1) - The slider "angle" isn't really providing enough emphasis to the red tick beats here. Ordinarily I'd ask you to split this into 1/1 slider and a 1/2 spaced circle since the vocal sound you're mapping ends on the red tick with the snare drum sound. However, I noticed that would break consistency with previous patterns 00:29:443 (2,1) and 00:34:126 (3,1) so perhaps you could just make a tighter angle on these? (Nah, 3/2 sliders make more sense in those cases)
2. 01:04:272 (2,3,4) - 01:13:638 (2,3,4) - Strong vocal notes at 01:04:565 and 01:13:931 are mapped to a sliderend, I feel 1/2 slider + 1/2 repeating slider would be a more suitable rhythm here (I disagree. White ticks are slightly stronger/more important and that's why I tried putting 1/2 sliders at those beats)
3. 01:19:931 (3,1) - Jump would be nice here, x-384 or so, though you'd need to move the following patterns to the right a bit as well (I opted for everything after this to x-192 to avoid a harsh return movement) (It's already at x:192 o.o)

1. 00:03:833 (3,4) - 00:08:516 (3,4) - Hold the phone guys we managed to split a couple of 1/2 sliders into a pair of circles, how's that for variety!? (^: (Bleh)
2. 01:04:272 (2,3,4) - 01:05:443 (3,4,5) - 01:13:638 (2,3,4) - Same as in Salad, I feel a 1/2 slider + 1/2 slider + circle rhythm fits better here (See answer at Salad)

1. 00:04:126 (1) - Repeat slider variety best meta please don't kill me (ayyyyyyy)
2. 00:52:711 (3,4) - 00:53:882 (3,4) - These zig-zag patterns are pretty harsh compared to the surrounding ones, I'd reduce the spacing between them a tiny bit (Really? I found 00:51:394 (2,3) - somehow more difficult than those ones)
3. 00:59:589 (2,3,4) - 01:04:272 (2,3,4) - 01:08:955 (2,3,4) - 01:13:931 (4,5) - Same rhythm change suggestion as in the previous diffs (ayyyyyyy)

1. 00:18:760 (2) - Considering the density of the map overall, this rhythm could be mapped in another way without ignoring what is really important here. I'm talking about 00:18:613 - . It's the most prominent beat after the finish sound on (1)'s head. By doing a pattern similar to 01:08:516 (1,2,3) - you will be still emphasising everything properly and making the most important things as "clickable" (Standard definition, dunno if this applies for CtB). Additionally, you should map this object that has a completely different rhythm than the others repeater sliders on this first section, such as 00:14:077 (2,2,2) - . (Ese beat no es tan importante. Además, la densidad de notas es ya de por sí alta como para andar añadiendo más cosas D:)
2. 00:28:711 - At this AR mapping 1/1 the same way as 5/2 (in terms of distance) is quite... not a good idea, basically. The AR doesn't help at all when it comes to recognize the same spacing with different ms in between. What I'm suggesting is either reducing the 1/1s or increasing the 3/2s. Emphasising is important, so maybe the second option is more viable. (Quizá parezca demasiado vacío, pero es mejor que dejar un break sin sentido ahí. El AR hace que se vean al menos 2 notas, por lo que no habrá muchos problemas al leerlo)
3. 00:38:662 (2,3,1,2,1) - 00:43:345 (2,3,1,2,1) - I am also wondering about these two patterns in particular being too dense compared to all the other patterns on the Kiai. Yes, there are a lot of beats audible on these sections, but the most intense part of the song is... particularly easier than these? Doesn't make too much sense if you think about it. (No hay demasiados sliders 3/2 en el kiai, pero hay definitivamente más 1/2 beats mapeados allí. Está mapeado así para diferenciarlo de la parte más tranquila y darle algo más de énfasis)
4. 01:04:272 - I'm quite surprised by the fact you are ignoring this beat completely even when it's very audible. You are losing the opportunity of placing a circle, basically, whereas in other parts that are as intense as this one, there's actually something on it. (Suena bien aquí. Hecho)
5. 01:10:857 (1,2,3) - I have no idea what you are trying to map here but it sounds a bit too off, personally let me recommend you a different rhythm that will cover each beat and follow the vocals even better 01:08:516 (1,2,3) - . (Suena más simple de esta forma, sobre todo para esta parte que es algo rara)

1. 00:23:735 (3,1,2) - I think there's a minor spacing mistake right here, you are supposed to make (1) emphasised instead of (2). Considering how you are building all this section, you should work around this pattern for a while. (Tiene sentido)
2. 00:33:687 (2,2) - Same rhythm, same beats, same musical part... but still, being mapped differently. Intended? Would love to see 00:33:687 (2) - with a repeater. without it kinda kills the momentum of the drums and emphasis. (Intenté seguir la letra en esta parte. No es necesario añadir una repetición)
3. 00:50:955 (1,2) - You may want to decrease the distance between these objects. If you hear the song from 00:50:955 - you will notice how every single hit emphasises the song gradually, and for that reason you should look forward to increase the spacing gradually for every single object. If you can hear (1,2) being louder than 00:52:126 (1,2) - (even when you added a custom hitsound to (2)) or 00:53:296 (1,2) - (same here) you need that sweet new pair of headphones! By the way, as a 400pp player it took me 3 tries to catch 00:50:809 (3,1) - properly, that's a really sharp angles and has a very bad transition along with 00:49:784 (1,2) - . (Adiós a mi mapeo lazy de esa parte huehueheuheheuheuhe)
4. 01:01:931 (2) - More like a personal request/preference, but could you curve this slider a bit? It requires too much movement when the music doesn't support it at all. (Acompaña al dash que hay que hacer para hacer ese slider. Creo que acompaña bien a la velocidad de ese dash)
5. 01:02:662 (1,2) - This transition needs a dash, however 01:03:248 (2,1) - doesn't. Even if the percussion on 01:03:833 - is stronger, you decided to not emphasise it. Quite weird. (No sé... creo que tampoco la distancia actual no queda mal. No es necesario ni hacerla pequeña ni tampoco exagerar con el dash imo)
6. 01:05:004 (1) - Two different type of sounds being mapped onto the same object. The first part from 01:05:004 - to 01:05:223 - it's a holdable sound with the "o~" in the background. The second one, although are a series of different sounds (aka a stream could be placed here) re-introducing the guitar and another part of the vocals. You could try to make a slider on the first part and then another slider for the second one, but definitely not on the same object, you want to emphasise everything properly. (Cambié el ritmo de esa parte quitando una repetición de ese slider y añadiendo notas. Espero que quede bien así)
7. 01:14:370 (1) - Burai slider hah. (AHUEHUEHUEHEEHEUHEUHEUHEHBRRRR)
8. 01:19:931 (3,1) - Maybe it's just me, but I wasn't able to catch (1) without a dash whilst 01:21:394 (1,1) - pretty much catchable without too much effort. Maybe moving (1) on x352 would fix this "issue". (Same stuff as 00:13:492 (1) - not that hard imo)
9. 01:24:174 - Aaaayyy, ignoring this is a sin. (Iré al infierno \:D/)

1. 00:09:613 (4,5,6,7,8) - I really think soft sampleset would do a better work here, considering there are no drums at all, so emphasising them that much sounds a bit too loud. (Reduje el volumen de esas notas. El hitsound encaja bastante bien, ya que el sonido es bastante similar a los que vienen después)
2. 00:12:321 (1) - Ugh, this could be a bit more curved, it's quite hard to follow every pattern here, try to copy it from 00:11:150 (1) - . Same goes to 00:17:004 (1) - . (Hecho)
3. 00:23:735 (3) - 00:28:418 (3) - You could divide them into two different clickable objects instead, emphasising the drums is something really important and worth on this section. (No hay mucha diferencia en CtB. Tanto 2 notas como un slider se interpretan de la misma forma)
4. 01:15:248 (4) - From what I can remember this it should be a stream. (Cambiado)

1. 00:03:833 (4,1) - Unsure about this hyper-dash a bit, it's killing the pace of the calm intro as a whole. Definitely wouldn't do this at all, especially when there's nothing really much to be emphasised. (Quitado)
2. 00:09:540 (4,5,6,7,8,9) - Basically the same I said on Platter. (^)
3. 00:26:809 (2,3,4) - And now here comes the problem. You are literally destroying the momentum of the 1/2 sliders by placing them like that. My suggestion mostly comes from analyzing your previous patterns; yes, the back-and-forth on (2,3,4) isn't a /bad/ idea, but definitely could be improved with HDashes, don't see a reason behind not to do them, so what about https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/3989640 ? (Para diferenciarlo de la parte anterior opté por los zigzags. Los HDashes pueden parecer exagerados, y con estos zigzags sin HDashes intento que la gente no se queje de que haya demasiados)
4. 00:56:077 (2) - Pretty much catchable without any movement. Are you sure you want to create this movement-cancellation or whatever it is called? I really think that extending this slider a bit (instead of curving it that much) may help overall to give the player a sort of idea the most intense part of the map is approaching, and so, they should start moving a bit more from the very beginning of this section. (Lo ensanché algo para intentar crear ese efecto)
5. 01:11:296 (2,3,4) - Such a low spacing between these notes. (Es algo complicado posicionar bien ese (2). Creo que la mejor opción fue esa)
6. Regarding streams: Even though I understand your point of "they sound very similar on pretty much every beat so isn't worth creating a separated movement" a bit, you should look into the streams on Platter, then, as they do require a certain movement from the players instead of just standing there and ignoring the flow of the map for a couple of seconds in between a jump-y section. Unless there's another reason behind the straight streams that I'm not understanding properly, take a look at both Platter and Rain and take your guess. (Si te fijas bien, los streams del Platter son notas que llevan una dirección continua, por lo que el jugador sólo debe moverse en una dirección para coger todas las notas. En el caso del Rain casi todos esos streams tienen un cambio de dirección para que el jugador tenga que moverse dos veces, complicando algo el movimiento. Sinceramente mapeé el Rain una semana antes que el Platter, por lo que no presté mucha atención a esos detalles. Si es algo crítico estoy dispuesto a arreglar esa parte)

[00:22] <@Deif> Is someone good at troll japanese metadata?
[00:23] <ByBy13> hmm which map?
[00:24] <@Deif> https://osu.ppy.sh/s/367646
[00:24] <blissfulyoshi> what is wrong with metadata there?
[00:24] <ByBy13> lemme see
[00:25] <@Deif> Capitalization of the artist
[00:25] <@Deif> And the "The Animation" of the title
[00:25] <ByBy13> hmm...
[00:26] <blissfulyoshi> in jp it is ダンガンロンパ 希望の学園と絶望の高校生 THE ANIMATION
[00:26] <@Deif> You mean the source?
[00:26] <ByBy13> yes
[00:27] <blissfulyoshi> oh sry, didn't see you meant title
[00:27] <blissfulyoshi> checking
[00:27] <ByBy13> me too
[00:27] <blissfulyoshi> but yeah, source does have "THE ANIMATION" in it
[00:27] <blissfulyoshi> according to waht I can find
[00:27] * BanchoBot sets mode: +o Stefan
[00:27] <@Deif> Roger that. Changing it
[00:28] <ByBy13> it isn't the first season of danganronpan?
[00:28] <blissfulyoshi> yes
[00:28] <blissfulyoshi> only season
[00:28] <blissfulyoshi> but yeah
[00:28] <@Deif> It's the ending of the only season
[00:28] * BanchoBot sets mode: +o Stefan
[00:28] <ByBy13> saw the title of anime
[00:28] <blissfulyoshi> trying to find an ost
[00:28] <blissfulyoshi> listing
[00:28] <ByBy13> there's no any 'the animation' there in title :C
[00:29] <@Deif> ZiRoX found [http://www.nbcuni.co.jp/rondorobe/anime/danganronpa/contents/hp0009/index00110000.html this]
[00:29] <@Deif> Disc2 song 26
[00:30] <blissfulyoshi> that was what I was thinking too
[00:30] <blissfulyoshi> sicne they always change the exact title in the ost
[00:30] <ZiRoX> however, there's one "downside" to that
[00:30] <ZiRoX> as it lists the artists without space
[00:30] <ZiRoX> スズムfeat.そらる
[00:30] <ZiRoX> kek
[00:30] <blissfulyoshi> because that is jp
[00:31] <blissfulyoshi> hmmmm
[00:31] <ByBy13> [https://puu.sh/ItWqd/e9f84254f7.jpg this is the logo of the anime]
[00:31] <blissfulyoshi> if we follow that
[00:31] <@Deif> That puush could not be found.
[00:31] <ZiRoX> that puush could not be found!
[00:31] <blissfulyoshi> then no space in artist
[00:31] <blissfulyoshi> and space in romanized
[00:31] <ByBy13> ugh D:
[00:32] <blissfulyoshi> oh yeah, add english source to tags please xD
[00:32] <ZiRoX> funny thing is next song has a space in the artist
[00:32] <@Deif> Oh hi, the 1st space appears here http://image16.poco.cn/mypoco/myphoto/20140909/23/6595184820140909234523095.jpg
[00:32] <ZiRoX> 小林幸子 feat.モノクマ
[00:32] <blissfulyoshi> or well english name of game
[00:32] <blissfulyoshi> xD
[00:32] <@Deif> Already added bliss
[00:32] <blissfulyoshi> kk
[00:32] <ZiRoX> deif, how
[00:32] <ZiRoX> I tried to find that :(
[00:32] <blissfulyoshi> dl the single?
[00:32] <@Deif> http://vgmdb.net/album/39979 > Search image in Google
[00:32] <blissfulyoshi> that works too
[00:32] <blissfulyoshi> I usually just dl the whole thing
[00:34] <ZiRoX> still can't find it
[00:34] <ZiRoX> hue
[00:34] <blissfulyoshi> lol
[00:34] <@Deif> [https://www.google.de/search?tbm=isch&tbs=simg:CAQSjgEaiwELEKjU2AQaBAgACAMMCxCwjKcIGmIKYAgDEijsF_1sLnQzCDLkM-gusDJ8M7RerDOomyyyyM-gmgTe3IY00uDPTPeM8GjAOqAVVhLB2rl3sj_1CdUudVi6xPEVTnnG-vgp9NR-gIt1aGpvvJtAu0CvTETjnGbjUgAgwLEI6u_1ggaCgoICAESBA9cgo8M&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjT0MSj1qLJAhUHiiwKHTShCC8Q2A4IHigB&biw=1920&bih=979 A]
[00:35] <ZiRoX> www
[00:35] <blissfulyoshi> so everything resolved now?
[00:35] <ByBy13> also at the artist I think after feat. there's no space If I'm not wrong
[00:35] <@Deif> Now I need to find a dl link for the whole thingy
[00:36] <@Deif> The capitalization of the artist is still missing
[00:36] <ByBy13> hmm o_o
[00:37] <blissfulyoshi> wait, why would official capitalization exist?
[00:37] <ByBy13> found the official website of suzumu
[00:38] <ByBy13> seems that the artist isn't in caps :(
[00:38] <blissfulyoshi> yay
[00:39] <@Deif> \o/
[00:41] <ByBy13> but seeing the logo of soraru,it is in caps
[00:41] <blissfulyoshi> lol
[00:41] <@Deif> ayayayay
[00:41] <ByBy13> check his official website
[00:41] <ByBy13> soraru.tokyo
[00:41] <blissfulyoshi> link
[00:42] <blissfulyoshi> oh okay
[00:42] <blissfulyoshi> oh wow, someone actually with a .tokyo tld
[00:42] <ByBy13> yea
[00:42] <ByBy13> xD
[00:43] <@Deif> So it'd be suzumu feat.SORARU?
[00:43] <ByBy13> I think yes
[00:43] <ZiRoX> '-'
[00:43] <ByBy13> something like this
[00:43] <blissfulyoshi> lol
[00:43] <blissfulyoshi> no space after feat?
[00:43] <ByBy13> yes
[00:44] <ByBy13> at jp letters as well I guess
[00:44] <@Deif> According to [http://image16.poco.cn/mypoco/myphoto/20140909/23/6595184820140909234523095.jpg this] there's only a space between suzumu and feat.
[00:44] <blissfulyoshi> kk
[00:45] <ByBy13> yes
[00:47] <@Deif> Alrighty. Thanks for the help!
[00:47] <ZiRoX> http://soraruru.jp/profile/
[00:47] <ZiRoX> what about this D:
[00:47] <@Deif> awawawawa
[00:48] <blissfulyoshi> lol
[00:48] <ByBy13> ugh
[00:48] <@Loctav> oh ffs Deif
[00:48] <ByBy13> :C
[00:48] <@Loctav> highlights
[00:48] <ZiRoX> LOL
[00:48] <@Loctav> check your highlights
[00:48] <@Loctav> :(
[00:48] <blissfulyoshi> I would follow what ZiroX found
[00:48] <@Deif> [https://yt3.ggpht.com/-j7IM_b95HNI/Va9Mc7MdYGI/AAAAAAAAACk/oHiL6XLqebU/w2120-fcrop64=1,00005a57ffffa5a8-nd/soraru%2Byoutube%2B%25E3%2583%2581%25E3%2583%25A3%25E3%2583%25B3%25E3%2583%258D%25E3%2583%25AB%25E3%2582%25A2%25E3%2583%25BC%25E3%2583%2588_e.jpg huh?]
[00:49] <blissfulyoshi> mostly because we never follow logos
[00:49] <ZiRoX> yeah, I had found the YT channel
[00:49] <blissfulyoshi> because jp titles would be in all caps then
[00:49] <ZiRoX> but I didn't find it "official" enough
[00:49] <ByBy13> oh yeah
[00:49] <ZiRoX> but what's with the two official sites
[00:49] <ZiRoX> wtf
[00:50] <blissfulyoshi> I wish I knew
[00:50] <blissfulyoshi> the artist needs to not update 2 different site
[00:50] <blissfulyoshi> if you want to use a new tld
[00:50] <ByBy13> yup
[00:50] <blissfulyoshi> at least redirect
[00:53] <ZiRoX> https://twitter.com/soraruru but well, his twitter account links to the second one
[00:53] <ZiRoX> the .jp one
[00:53] <blissfulyoshi> kk
[00:53] <blissfulyoshi> .jp it is then
[00:54] <ZiRoX> this metadata thing is hard :(
[00:54] <ByBy13> so it means that there's no caps

1. 00:14:662 (1,2) - This is the only slider that provides antiflow and it has the same distance than the rest of the patterns. I'd either reduce it's distance a bit, or plainly make this normal flow. (En qué carajo estaba pensando aquí)
2. On the 01:11:443 (2,3,1,2) - part I don't really agree with the rhythm choices. Give the following a try and check if you deem it better and acceptable, but I can understand that it is to keep the note density as lowest as possible. (I'll leave this one. I know it doesn't follow the lyrics this time, but it's hard to keep a low combo otherwise)
   

1. 00:11:150 (1,2) - I'm not sure if you intend that this kind of distance (this applies for the following patterns, too) are meant to be done walking or dashing. While testplaying, it didn't tell me "you have to dash!", so I end up walking them and they felt a bit too tight. I think some more definition (either a bit larger distance to really induce dashing or a bit smaller to give the feeling it's really walkable) would be better. (Es esa distancia en la que se puede hacer al límite sin usar el dash. La dejaré por ahora, ya que bam de la melodía hará que se use el dash instintivamente para los jugadores que no quieran tomar mucho riesgo)
2. 00:19:345 (1) - Hmm, feels really easy to miss. I think the x1,46 distance you used on the following similar patterns is better, so try moving this to x:336. (Es la misma distancia que en el pattern anterior. No lo veo tan difícil como para reducirlo aún más)
3. 01:01:492 (1,2) - This distance also triggers the same doubt. I feel a x1,74 distance, like you used on 00:57:687 (3,1) - , is better. (Al ser el kiai puedo ser algo más permisivo, además va bien con la letra)
4. 01:05:004 (1) - I think you could move this one to x:304 to really push players to dash. (Parece algo exagerado x.x)

1. 00:30:760 (4,5,1) - This is also a bit of a "do I dash or do I walk?" pattern, so maybe x:288 for (5) and x:176 for (1) is better. (Voy a dejarlo como está para darle algo de énfasis a ese (1). Si lo muevo más a la derecha pierde algo de fuerza el salto a la siguiente nota)
2. 00:35:443 (4,5,1) - ^Also applies on Ctrl+H ver.!

1. ♥

19:09 Gamu: According to his profile, soraru is correct: http://puu.sh/lwX5e/9de9ce9cfd.jpg
19:09 Gamu: http://soraruru.jp/profile/
19:10 KittyAdventure: so, suzumu feat.soraru is correct?
19:10 Gamu: yeah
19:11 KittyAdventure: okay, thanks~ :3