1. Easy (1.46 stars, 97 notes)
2. Hard (2.63 stars, 196 notes)
3. Insane (4.25 stars, 320 notes)
4. Light Insane (3.32 stars, 242 notes)
5. Normal (1.93 stars, 152 notes)

All diffs by me!

Watch the video on Nanatsu's comment if you want to satisfy your ears.

CaffeAmericano wrote:

• 
  Easy

1. 00:43:960 (3,1,2) - 흐름 추천. 아래 이미지 대로 하면 00:43:960 (3,1) - 얘네 둘 스택할수 있고, 00:41:855 (1) - 도 조금만 바꾸면 00:43:960 (3) - 블랭킷도 할수 있겠네요. 수정
   
   ㅇㅅㅇ

   
2. 01:05:539 (2) - 블랭킷 살짝 삐뚤 음... https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/3781600 이 정도도 비뚤어졌다고 하시면 그냥 모든 담요를 다 뜯어고쳐야 할 듯... 수정하긴 했는데 전보다 좋아진 건지 어쩐지도 모르겠네요.
3. 01:08:171 (2,2) - 조금 겹치네요 너무 멀어서 안 보여서 ㄱㅊ
4. 01:08:521 (3,2) - 아니면 01:08:521 (3,3) - 스택할 수 있을듯 링크 걸으신 게 01:13:785 (2) - 이거랑 01:14:135 (3) - 이걸 말씀하시는 것 같은데 콤보를 하나 이상 건너뛰면 링크가 제대로 작동이 안 됩니다. 그렇게 먼 건 굳이 스택에 신경쓰면서까지 매핑에 제약을 주고 싶지는 않네요.
5. 01:18:346 (5,3) - 01:21:504 (2,3) - 스택 일부러 빗나가게 그려놓은 겁니다.
6. 01:23:609 (2,1) - 살짝 오버랩 수정
7. 01:32:206 (1) - 이지인데 스피너 너무 짧은것 같아요. 위키에선 2~3 measure 이상을 추천하던데. bpm도 어느정도 높고, 랭 시킬때 조금 위험할 수도 있을것 같네요. 사실 좀 애매하긴 한데 아마 괜찮을 거라고 생각하긴 하지만... 그래서 일부러 이지만 01:32:206 - 여기에 노트를 안 넣고 1박자나 쉴 틈을 준 뒤에 스피너를 돌리게 한 건데 애매하네요. BN 모딩도 불러놨으니 그쪽을 좀 기다려볼게요.

• 
  Normal

1. 01:05:013 (2,6) - 조금 겹치는데, 아예 01:06:416 (5,6) - 조금 옯겨서 스택 하면 어떨까요 오버랩이 꼭 나쁜 건 아닙니다. 오히려 너무 제자리에서 놀지 않는다는 느낌을 주는 효과가 있어서 여기도 그런 목적으로 사용한 건데, 스택을 시키면 모양이 너무 찌그러져서 별로일 것 같습니다.
2. 01:07:820 (2) - 블랭킷 조금 삐뚤 저보다 블랭킷 꼼꼼하게 잡는 사람 처음 봤네요... 근데 그거 너무 자주 하시면 되게 싫어하는 사람들도 있으니 조심하시길...
3. 00:46:065 (4,1) - 요것도 스택하면 이쁠듯 :3 여기도 링크 깨졌는데, 00:50:276 (1) - 이걸 말씀하신 거겠죠? 그런데 진짜 이렇게나 멀리 떨어진 노트는 스택을 하나마나 거의 상관이 없어서... 그걸 맞추기 위해 다른 노트들의 배치에 제한을 받는 것보다는 스택 같은 거 생각하지 않고 흐름 만드는 게 훨씬 나아서요.

KuronumaSawako wrote:

I think you have to remove "(tv size)" from title according to this: http://vgmdb.net/album/21746 and this http://www.cdjapan.co.jp/product/SVWC-7736 and put it in tags, don't know if this is really new a rule or something but a friend of mine said that you can't put tv size in the title unless the title was released officially with now days...

Yuii- wrote:

Hey, Gan. "ga" is repeated in tags! <3

Yuii- wrote:

Read the first line of my userpage. You gotta wait

PostScr1pt wrote:

거의 한 달 동안 쉬다 와서 매핑 감각이 다 떨어져서 잘 안보입니다 저퀄이지만 이해 부탁드립니다 ;ㅅ;

Easy
[*]AR 3으로 맞췄으면 하네요.
[*]00:37:469 (2) - Ctrl + H 하는게 제 기준에서는 더 자연스럽네요

Normal
01:21:153 (4) - http://puu.sh/kCEyI/ff2bdce608.jpg모양으로 하는 것도 괜찮아 보임
01:30:100 (4,5,1,2) - http://puu.sh/kCEGg/03ceccfc0f.jpg 이 박자는 어떨까요

Light Insane
01:21:153 (1,2) - 둘이 바꿔서 사각점프로하고 01:21:855 (5) 위치만 살짝 바꾸면 될 듯 한데...
01:31:855 (3,4) - 둘이 바꾸는게 더 좋을 거 같네요.

Insane
00:19:048 (5,6) - 이것도 둘이 체인지...
00:28:872 (4) - Ctrl + H
01:15:890 (2,3) - Ctrl + G
01:21:855 (3,4,5,6,7) - 디스턴스 조금 더 크게 하는게...

맵 잘 만드셨네요 쿠도스 하나 쏘고 갑니다 :3

PostScr1pt wrote:

거의 한 달 동안 쉬다 와서 매핑 감각이 다 떨어져서 잘 안보입니다 저퀄이지만 이해 부탁드립니다 ;ㅅ;

Easy
[*]AR 3으로 맞췄으면 하네요. AR 스프레드를 좀 더 일정하게 맞추고 싶었습니다. 지금 노말과 2.5가 차이나는데 이게 시간상으로는 300ms 차이고 비율상으로 보면 정말 얼마 되지 않아서... 지금도 사실 노말-하드 사이의 비율보다 더 작거든요.
[*]00:37:469 (2) - Ctrl + H 하는게 제 기준에서는 더 자연스럽네요 음 외관상으로도 그렇고 전 지금이 더 좋은 듯하네요.

Normal
01:21:153 (4) - http://puu.sh/kCEyI/ff2bdce608.jpg모양으로 하는 것도 괜찮아 보임 노말에서 너무 막 겹치면 별로 안 좋기도 하고 난이도별로 조금씩 노트 밀도를 달리 해온지라 01:21:679 - 여기는 비우고 싶네요.
01:30:100 (4,5,1,2) - http://puu.sh/kCEGg/03ceccfc0f.jpg 이 박자는 어떨까요 너무 길게 이어붙인 느낌이어서...

Light Insane
01:21:153 (1,2) - 둘이 바꿔서 사각점프로하고 01:21:855 (5) 위치만 살짝 바꾸면 될 듯 한데... 음 그것도 좀 그렇고 패턴을 다르게 바꿔봤어요.
01:31:855 (3,4) - 둘이 바꾸는게 더 좋을 거 같네요. 수정

Insane
00:19:048 (5,6) - 이것도 둘이 체인지... 그 다음 00:19:223 (6,1) - 이거랑 거리가 멀어야 되서...
00:28:872 (4) - Ctrl + H 지금이 흐름이 더 좋은 거 같습니다. 00:28:521 (3,4) - 00:29:749 (3,6) - 세트 모양인 것도 있고요.
01:15:890 (2,3) - Ctrl + G 2개씩 끊은 거라...
01:21:855 (3,4,5,6,7) - 디스턴스 조금 더 크게 하는게... 0.9x로 수정

맵 잘 만드셨네요 쿠도스 하나 쏘고 갑니다 :3 감사합니다!

1. 160kbps for the mp3? That is one weird bitrate o.o Here is a 192kbps ver of the mp3 if you want it.
2. All fine other than that.

1. 00:09:574 (3,4,1) - Honestly I'm not really a fan of this flow, as (2,3,4,1) isn't a rhombus pattern themselves, and the overlap with (3) and (2) is kinda visible due to the low AR. While it is barely noticeable and it doesn't affect gameplay much, you could have made a cleaner pattern which still flows well : (reduced AR to show everything)
   
   
2. 00:15:188 (3,1,2) - I would preferably not use this pattern, as (3) is pointing towards (2) when (1) and (2) are both visible. Even with the NC, beginners are more likely to click (2) rather than (1) because of this. You could have brought (1) down where (2) is, and move (2) so that it makes a triangle somwhere else than this.
3. 00:41:855 (1,1) - Another overlap that I don't really like. Like the above overlap, while it is barely noticeable, both of them touch each other's head and tails which doesn't really look good if you ask me.
4. 01:26:767 (3,4) - I'm not sure how off-blanket works, but it is kinda weird to use towards the end since all others were blanketed normally. You could have instead go for 2 straight sliders which keeps the flow similar.

1. 00:19:399 (1,1,1) - Honestly I don't see the use of NC spam here, it is not like the life drain is harsh at this point or anything, newer players may find it easier to follow if they had those arrows pointing to the next note.
2. 00:53:083 (1) - I'm not really much against the use of more than 1x repeated sliders, but there should be only a max. of 2 repeats in lower difficulties. While the slider is long enough and players are able to read them, beginners especially won't be able to follow that long, as they won't really expect how many repeats will be there.
3. 01:21:679 - I'm not sure why is this place left blank here. Like, 01:21:153 (4,5) - these notes shows the pinnacle of the build-up for this section, and it feels really weird to have this place not mapped as it is like the strongest part of the section. You could move (5) back to this place, and add a circle at 01:22:206 - to fill in the space.

1. 00:06:065 (3,1,2,3,1) - Omg this confused me so hard when I testplayed this difficulty o.o Was expecting lots of 1/2 sliders, but I guess that is not the case. Well you may keep it, although using this rhythm may be lesser confusing to follow.
2. 00:32:556 (2,3,4) - Notes here are placed kinda awkwardly, as techincally (3) should have a jump too as that is having a strong instrument. I suggest you to space these notes equally to address this.
3. 00:53:083 (1,1,1,1) - Honestly I don't see a use of NC spam here too, as there is no SV changes, or sudden jumps, or anything out of the blue that does require any NC spam.
4. 00:54:661 (1) - Slider end isn't snapped according to AIMod.

1. 00:10:978 (1,2) - I don't really like the looks of this slider bow, the tail of (2) is getting overlapped by (1). Well by the word bow the tail of the 'arrow' should be sticking out, not blocked.
2. 00:16:241 (4,5,1) - For pattern like this when a circle has a jump and the following object isn't stacked, it is better to just make the distance equal; besides, (5) and (1) should technically have a jump as you can emphasize the strong beat on (1).
3. Well I can't point out much on higher difficulties as I don't mod them much ;-;

1. 00:12:556 (1,2,3) - Something similar to what I've mentioned in Light Insane, techincally they should be having the same distance, as there is no NC to indicate there is a sudden bigger jump at (3).
2. 00:39:048 (1,2,3,4,5,1,2,3,4,5,6,1,2,3,4,5) - Honestly I found the combo getting out of consistency with the drum beat... The previous pattern was blank - triplet - blank - 5plet - blank - triplet - and so on. (One word indicates one full measure of beats - 4 beats.)But then from this part the the triplet usage increases. If this is the case the previous part should have just mapped out all the triplets instead of leaving out some of them. Try to follow the rhythm from before.
3. Well just being me who doesn't mod Insane well ;-;

[Sc4v4ng3r] wrote:

Hello~ Mod as requested in-game~

1. Unrankable issues
2. My opinion which I highly recommend changing it
3. Small suggestions/nazi

[General]

1. 160kbps for the mp3? That is one weird bitrate o.o Here is a 192kbps ver of the mp3 if you want it. Yee you converted my mp3 into 192kbps, which only makes the mp3 file bigger, but not better quality. I want a legit 192kbps mp3 tho ;w;
2. All fine other than that.

[Easy]

1. 00:09:574 (3,4,1) - Honestly I'm not really a fan of this flow, as (2,3,4,1) isn't a rhombus pattern themselves, and the overlap with (3) and (2) is kinda visible due to the low AR. While it is barely noticeable and it doesn't affect gameplay much, you could have made a cleaner pattern which still flows well : (reduced AR to show everything) Fixed the overlap, but not quite like what you suggested.
   
   
2. 00:15:188 (3,1,2) - I would preferably not use this pattern, as (3) is pointing towards (2) when (1) and (2) are both visible. Even with the NC, beginners are more likely to click (2) rather than (1) because of this. You could have brought (1) down where (2) is, and move (2) so that it makes a triangle somwhere else than this. I don't think it's that confusing, since 00:15:188 (3) - this already gives a lot of time to prepare for the next notes and even newbies can see the number 1 there. The flow isn't bad as well.
3. 00:41:855 (1,1) - Another overlap that I don't really like. Like the above overlap, while it is barely noticeable, both of them touch each other's head and tails which doesn't really look good if you ask me. Fixed.
4. 01:26:767 (3,4) - I'm not sure how off-blanket works, but it is kinda weird to use towards the end since all others were blanketed normally. You could have instead go for 2 straight sliders which keeps the flow similar. They should be tightly curved if I blanket them, and straight sliders are okay, but this one also works. Can't see much problem with that anyway.

[Normal]

1. 00:19:399 (1,1,1) - Honestly I don't see the use of NC spam here, it is not like the life drain is harsh at this point or anything, newer players may find it easier to follow if they had those arrows pointing to the next note. Yee, fixed it with another modder.
2. 00:53:083 (1) - I'm not really much against the use of more than 1x repeated sliders, but there should be only a max. of 2 repeats in lower difficulties. While the slider is long enough and players are able to read them, beginners especially won't be able to follow that long, as they won't really expect how many repeats will be there. You said beginner there, but 'beginners' are not expected to play this diff (If one do, he/she is going over things too fast) and the 'Normal' players should already know how this game works. If the slider is too short, yeah it could be confusing a lot, but it's 3/2 length, which is pretty much enough to react.
3. 01:21:679 - I'm not sure why is this place left blank here. Like, 01:21:153 (4,5) - these notes shows the pinnacle of the build-up for this section, and it feels really weird to have this place not mapped as it is like the strongest part of the section. You could move (5) back to this place, and add a circle at 01:22:206 - to fill in the space. Hmm I wanted to keep this diff pretty simple but yeah, would be good to fill there. Added a circle between them.

[Hard]

1. 00:06:065 (3,1,2,3,1) - Omg this confused me so hard when I testplayed this difficulty o.o Was expecting lots of 1/2 sliders, but I guess that is not the case. Well you may keep it, although using this rhythm may be lesser confusing to follow. It can possibly confuse players on first try, but this pattern fits here so much and only 1 retry would fix it. I'll keep it unless some BNs point it out.
2. 00:32:556 (2,3,4) - Notes here are placed kinda awkwardly, as techincally (3) should have a jump too as that is having a strong instrument. I suggest you to space these notes equally to address this. I'm 100% fixing every distances on this diff (except stacks), so well... no, maybe?
3. 00:53:083 (1,1,1,1) - Honestly I don't see a use of NC spam here too, as there is no SV changes, or sudden jumps, or anything out of the blue that does require any NC spam. NC also can be used to emphasize specific rhythms. An example? https://osu.ppy.sh/b/779653 I modded this map a while ago and I actually pointed out from Normal diff, 00:55:049 (1,1,1,1) - Isn't this NC spam too much? The answer was, why not? So yeah... NC is useful for those.
4. 00:54:661 (1) - Slider end isn't snapped according to AIMod. lol I copy&pasted the sliders and that sometimes happens... fixed that.

[Light Insane]

1. 00:10:978 (1,2) - I don't really like the looks of this slider bow, the tail of (2) is getting overlapped by (1). Well by the word bow the tail of the 'arrow' should be sticking out, not blocked. It doesn't look too bad for me, since 'overlapping' is kinda used for appearnce too, and the slider body is gone very quickly so the whole 00:11:504 (2) - can be clearly seen while on it.
2. 00:16:241 (4,5,1) - For pattern like this when a circle has a jump and the following object isn't stacked, it is better to just make the distance equal; besides, (5) and (1) should technically have a jump as you can emphasize the strong beat on (1). Though I used finish on 00:16:592 - , I'm prominently following the melody first, so 00:16:416 (5) - this is worth emphasized 00:16:416 (5,1,2,3,4) - these can be a 'set' with a fixed distance.
3. Well I can't point out much on higher difficulties as I don't mod them much ;-;

[Insane]

1. 00:12:556 (1,2,3) - Something similar to what I've mentioned in Light Insane, techincally they should be having the same distance, as there is no NC to indicate there is a sudden bigger jump at (3). NC is not really needed to justify jumps on Insane. It's emphasizing both the clap sound on 00:12:732 (2) - and the melody on 00:12:907 -
2. 00:39:048 (1,2,3,4,5,1,2,3,4,5,6,1,2,3,4,5) - Honestly I found the combo getting out of consistency with the drum beat... The previous pattern was blank - triplet - blank - 5plet - blank - triplet - and so on. (One word indicates one full measure of beats - 4 beats.)But then from this part the the triplet usage increases. If this is the case the previous part should have just mapped out all the triplets instead of leaving out some of them. Try to follow the rhythm from before. Don't need to use exactly the same rhythm while the music keeps changing. Second part is definitely different than the first part. It's only boring if I use same rhythm pattern over and over again for the whole big section.
3. Well just being me who doesn't mod Insane well ;-;

That is all from me. You got my support, have a kudos Thanks very much!
GL!

Moly wrote:

초보 모더입니다!! 다 무시하도 괜찮습니다!!!ㄹㅇ

[Normal]

01:01:504 (1) - 디스탠스가 있는 게 일관성이 있을 것 같긴 한데... 벌리기엔 위치가 너무 애매 보컬 위주의 매핑인지라, 01:01:679 - 이 지점을 좀 더 강조하기 위해 저렇게 넣었습니다.

[ㄹㅇHard]

도약님 하드 진짜 엄청 깔끔함 ㄹㅇ ㅋㅅㅋ

00:12:732 - 드럼 소리 들리는데 노트가 없어서 없어서 허전하다는 느낌이 들었습니다. 바꾸시겠다면 01:29:925 - 이쪽도!!! 라이트 인센보다 쉬는 곳 더 만들어준다고 뺐는데 지적이 더 오면 고치겠습니다.
00:20:978 (2) - 이대로라면 이쪽도 뉴콤해도 괜찮지 않을까요? 좀 더 모딩 받으면서 생각을 해봐야겠는데... 일단 고쳐보았습니다.

[Light Insane]

00:31:504 (2) - 너무 사소하긴 한데 ㅋㅋ;; 이거 http://puu.sh/kCQGN/0777673348.jpg 머리랑 꼬리 둘 다 아래 흰 선에 닿는 게 좋지 않을까요? 3도 정도 꺾으면 되는 것 같던데. 엌 굳이 균형 맞출 생각이 있던 건 아니지만 고쳐봤습니다.
00:35:013 (2) - 제가 보기에만 그럴지도 모르는데... 위치가 애매해보여요. 지금 상태에서 3도 정도 꺾은 다음 x:248 y:248로 이동 하는 게 더 이쁠지도.. 근데 제가 주관이 너무 쌔서... 상진님 IRC 모딩 때 쫙 바꿔버렸네요... ㅋㅋㅋ
01:12:030 (3) - 위치 약간 애매하지 않을까요? 01:11:153 (1) - 이거 머리랑 안 겹치게 하든가 완전히 겹치게 하든가 그러는게 좋을 것 같아요!! 여기도 상진님 모딩 때... 똑같은 거 지적하셨 ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ



[Insane]
00:15:363 (1,2,3) - 그냥 삼각형 그리는 것도 괜찮을 것 같아요. 다 점프를 넣을 만한 곳은 아니라고 생각했고 그래서 2를 강조하기 위해 그 앞에만 점프를 넣었습니다.
00:24:399 (4,5) - 이거랑 00:30:013 (4,5) - 이거 디스탠스 약간 넣어도 괜찮을지도... 걍 스택으로 둘래요 ㅋㅋㅋ
00:33:960 (2,3,4,5) - 디스탠스 맞추는 게 좋을 것 같아요!! 저도 흐름이 아주 마음에 들지는 않는데 일단 클랩 있는 곳마다 강조를 해주고 있는 터라 점프는 유지해야겠어요.
01:06:241 (3) - 디스탠스 더 길어도 될 것 같은데... 조금 더 벌려봤어요.




으아 나름 열심히 했는데 거의 안보이네요 ㅠㅠ

klonoa wrote:

YES, another great map from doyak <3

*star*

Neoskylove wrote:

바쁘지만 힘든 도약님을 위해 모당왔습니다! 키랏☆

General
동영사아아아앙 비트맵 설명 좀 봐주시면...

이지
00:40:451 (2) - 블랭킷! http://puu.sh/kDxtT/cfca3ce5be.jpg 동선이 너무 꺾여서 일부러 안 했어요.
이지는 사실 봐 줄게 없는........

노마아아아아알
00:29:223 (3) - 기분 탓이겠죠...? 다음 슬라이더랑 흐름 안캇는거 같은건... 그냥 무난한 것 같아요.
00:35:363 (5) - 이거 수직 되도록 정확히 찍어보시는게..... 맵 컨셉이 수직 수평이 아니어서 가능하면 일절 쓰지 않으려고 했습니다.

하드
00:21:679 - 여기에 뭔가 박자가 있었으면....... 너무 세세한 것까지 여기서 표현 안 하려 했어요.
00:27:293 - ^(어게 위에랑 같다는거 맞...죠?) ^
00:37:469 (1) - 00:39:048 (1) - 이거 꼬리에 스탴 앗 제가 이건 100% 거리 고정한다고 짜고 있었는데 실수로 3/2박 거리를 그쪽에 넣어버렸었네요... 덕분에 실수를 찾아냈네요. 수정하면서 스택도 시켰어요.
00:42:381 (2) - 곡률...이상해요 전 괜찮은뎁...
01:21:855 (3) - 슬라이더 01:22:118 - 여기까지 01:22:206 - 여기에 서클 그런 부분이 맵 전체에 좀 많으면 쓸 만도 한데 저렇게 생겨먹은 게 저것뿐이라 갑자기 되게 헷갈릴 수 있는 요소를 첨가하고 싶진 않네요.

가벼운 인세인
00:51:504 (3,1) - 살짝만 펴줘영 http://puu.sh/kDy1C/b114953ce9.jpg 지금 정도 구부려야 다음 오른쪽으로 나갈 때 부드러운 느낌이 될 거 같습니다.
00:59:574 (2) - 얘 꼬리랑 00:59:925 (1) - 얘 고리랑 스택 의도같은데 제대로 안겹쳐졌어요 저거 고쳤던 거 같은데 이상하네... 수정했습니다.
"키랏"할때 01:03:609 - 01:03:697 - 여기 두개에 노트를.... 구곡 랭크맵이 딱 그렇게 하긴 했는데 저는 그 소리가 딱히 1/4이라기보단 그냥 빠르게 발음하는 느낌이라 굳이 2연타라는 그런 이레귤러적인 요소를 넣어가면서까지 하고 싶진 않았어요.

인센
00:19:399 (1,2,3) - 이거 라잇인센처럼 점프로 해두는게... 그 직전에 이미 빡센 점프가 있어서 또 점프시키기는 좀 뭐하고 그래서 그냥 거리만 더 벌려봤어요.
00:30:013 (4,5) - 얘네 둘 00:30:627 (1) - 머리 스택 고의로 반스택 시킨 것까지 무조건 이러시면 안 됩니다...
00:53:083 (1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2) - 이거 전부다 1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,3 서클로 바꿔보시는게 어떻습니까 엑스트라에서나 할 짓인 듯 ㅋㅋㅋㅋ[b]
00:55:363 (2,3,4) - 뜬금 없지만 1/8진동 슬라 ㄱㄱ...? [b]오버매핑
01:15:890 (2) - 컨트롤지 2개씩 묶어서 똑같이 보내는 게 목적
01:16:241 (3) - ^ ^
01:18:697 (2) - ^ ^

1. 클랩 일부러 그렇게 넣으신건가요? 00:47:469 - 구간을 제외하고는 흰틱 2,4에 오는게 더 자연스러울것 같습니다만.
2. 01:09:925 (1) - 01:12:732 (1) - 01:22:556 (1) - 피니시 머리에 넣어주세요.

1. 00:13:434 - 클랩
2. 00:25:890 (2) - 무슨 의도의 휘슬이셨나요? 여기가 특별한 음이 나오는 것도 아니고 대응하는 파트인 00:37:118 (2)에는 휘슬 처리가 안되어있어서 통일성이 떨어지게 느껴졌습니다.
3. 01:22:556 (1) - 피니시

1. 00:43:258 (1) - 피니시
2. 00:55:188 (2) - 이왕 앞에 계속 뉴콤 넣으셨으니 여기도 넣어버리는건 어때요?
3. 01:22:556 (1) - 피니시

1. 00:14:311 (2,3) - 잘 이해가 가지 않는 랜덤 점프였습니다. 차라리 (3,1)이 점프인게 더 어울렸을듯 싶네요.
2. 00:17:820 (4,1) - 이거도 좀 랜덤 점프 느낌이었습니다.
3. 00:27:293 (5,6) - 00:28:346 (2,3) - 00:29:223 (1,2) - 플레이하기에는 좋은 점프입니다. 근데 음악이랑은 안어울리네요.
4. 00:31:504 (2,3,1) - 음악에 큰 변화가 없어서 굳이 (3,1)이 점프일 필요는 없어보입니다. 차라리 (1,2)에 점프 넣는게 더 나아보입니다.
5. 00:34:311 (4,1) - 00:39:048 (1,2) - 00:41:855 (1,2) - 00:45:188 (2,3) - 01:01:328 (4,1) - 01:07:118 (1,2) - 01:28:171 (1,2) - 그외 퀄리티를 저해한 랜덤 점프들.
6. 00:43:785 (3,4,5) - 롱놋 처리하실 거면 간격 일치하게 두세요.
7. 01:05:539 (1,2,3,4,5) - 그냥 물처럼 흐르는 것보다 (2,3)의 흐름이 꺾이는게 더 플레이에 흥미로웠을 것 같네요.
8. 01:21:679 (4,5) - 개인적으로 좀 너무 큰 점프 아니었나 싶네요.
9. 01:22:556 (1) - 피니시
10. 01:28:171 (1,2) - ctrl+G 해서 흐름 꺾는게 더 자연스러울 것 같아요.

1. 00:14:837 (4,5,1) - (5,1)의 흐름이 부자연스럽네요.
2. 00:18:346 (2,3) - 다시 랜덤 점프의 냄새가
3. 00:43:258 (1) - 피니시
4. 00:50:276 (1,2) - 개인적인 느낌입니다만 00:47:469 (1,2) - 00:48:872 (1,2)에 비해 점프가 약해서 조금 아쉬웠습니다.
5. 01:22:556 (1) - 피니시