Scroll up andGlasslake wrote:
Heh, no. How can you be so sure you can HD+FL a map as soon you turn off spun out? That guy spent 1 playcount on each map he #1'd.
And just for your information, here are the dates where he scores those #1s.SPOILER[attachment=1:77c6d]scores.jpg[/attachment:77c6d]
All 5 in the same day, all 5 in the same hour, you're gonna say that possible with just spun out and offline practice? Ya right.
and he is one of the most. I don't know what are you attempt to say here. Sorry for my bad English.>_>deepsea wrote:
You can only say "most" instead of surely for this bla bla
I reported.Glasslake wrote:
Also, you !multi'd him yourself one time and he appeared to have another account, so why is this guy still there?
[attachment=0:77c6d]multi.jpg[/attachment:77c6d]
Yes.Glasslake wrote:
And then Sprosive made a video.
Scroll up andGlasslake wrote:
Now who the fuck is this directed to?
And if you need a reason, scroll up again.deepsea wrote:
For people accused someone simply because "he is too good"(Not all just them)
deepsea wrote:
I don't think "too good" is a reason for accusing people, yes it is a indication to doubt. But as an indication, you can keep an eye on this player's plays and find more proof, like impossible move or constant 477 spin, THEN ACCUSE A PLAYER BY ALL PROVE INSTEAD OF THE REASON "HE IS GOOD". doubts need no proof but accuses do.
I am doing this, or we can do this as another way like ppy spec, this is the only surely prove.Glasslake wrote:
That would be the best way, yes.
Also INB4 people flame me for "cheater supporter" or something else, I better say this first. Cheaters suck and gtfo osu. I just want to prove and yes there is an easy way to do(ppy spec). So I think its better to keep on doubt instead of accuse atm.