IMO, just DON'T make ctb diffs give too many pp.
forum
Performance Points feedback and suggestions (Catch the Beat)
posted
Total Posts
775
-Ryuujii- wrote:
Why can't you guys just be patient lol xD
This, please, a system bases on real difficulty wouln't need this.alienflybot wrote:
IMO, just DON'T make ctb diffs give too many pp.
i got 200 pp today 
new system so op
new system so op
Seph
LOVE & ROLL (isn't FC) > God only knows (FC) ???
and CTB diffs are too overrated.
So ar10 maps > lower ar maps? Hm..Seph wrote:
I'm totally fine with Airman (jumpy) and No Pain, No gain aho diff (insanely long sliders, jumpy that makes it hard to fc) on top performance but astrosexy? and Illumiscape and Ridorii aren't even FCs, yet they are there.
There are need to be more change.
Only so few maps are big pp maps. Standard of giving pp is too much towards on few factors. Accordingly, if we just played the pp maps, we can farming many pp even though not FCed or cleared with Easy mods (EZ, HT, NF). If you want, i can post the examples of the maps too! It is worst than ppv1...
And still many CTB maps are overrated in performances!
Skills to Minority Extra map or CTB maps is not skill of all. There are lot of variations.
But i know this ppv2 is not finally decided yet. So i hope to renewing ppv2 consistently.
Only so few maps are big pp maps. Standard of giving pp is too much towards on few factors. Accordingly, if we just played the pp maps, we can farming many pp even though not FCed or cleared with Easy mods (EZ, HT, NF). If you want, i can post the examples of the maps too! It is worst than ppv1...
And still many CTB maps are overrated in performances!
Skills to Minority Extra map or CTB maps is not skill of all. There are lot of variations.
But i know this ppv2 is not finally decided yet. So i hope to renewing ppv2 consistently.
priority seems more legit this time lol
why does non FC map appear on top ranks?
Also for normal diff with HR, and FL (1 miss)
Then another hard
pls
Edit: i guess FC doesn't matter
best performance is marked base on your stability and "performance", thought some maps is still not FC-able / Hard to FC, like Rainbow Dash or Kirby mix Deluxe.
why does non FC map appear on top ranks?
Also for normal diff with HR, and FL (1 miss)
Then another hard
pls
Edit: i guess FC doesn't matter
best performance is marked base on your stability and "performance", thought some maps is still not FC-able / Hard to FC, like Rainbow Dash or Kirby mix Deluxe.
Yes, because AR10 is 1.5x faster than AR9, and AR9 is 1.5x faster than AR8, and etc-Ryuujii- wrote:
So ar10 maps > lower ar maps? Hm..Seph wrote:
I'm totally fine with Airman (jumpy) and No Pain, No gain aho diff (insanely long sliders, jumpy that makes it hard to fc) on top performance but astrosexy? and Illumiscape and Ridorii aren't even FCs, yet they are there.
so, technically, since you have that less reaction time, AR10 is excessively difficult, much like how much more difficult CS10 is than CS9, and to CS8, and etc.
It's just all game elements that don't appear to make a huge impact, but they really do when you get it to the highest difficulty of these effects.
FC shouldn't have to matter too much (Although, it does give a tiny boost) It's more based on score and accuracy than anything now, mostly because of the fact that the only thing that slowly increases when you get better is the accuracy itself. (I feel combo has a somewhat important saying matter in there too)petiskacang wrote:
priority seems more legit this time lol
why does non FC map appear on top ranks?
Also for normal diff with HR, and FL (1 miss)
Then another hard
pls
Edit: i guess FC doesn't matter
best performance is marked base on your stability and "performance", thought some maps is still not FC-able / Hard to FC, like Rainbow Dash or Kirby mix Deluxe.
FC only mattered because often FC means getting good rankings. It's more of "This is the difficulty, how much of the difficulty can you do?" And that's pretty much how pp goes.
It no longer focuses on other players. It tallies up how well YOU do, then compares that tally to others.
Topic Starter
You can't farm the hard pp maps without close-to-fc scores, let alone with easy mods. It would be nice if you could provide examples of where such things are possible.-PM- wrote:
There are need to be more change.
Only so few maps are big pp maps. Standard of giving pp is too much towards on few factors. Accordingly, if we just played the pp maps, we can farming many pp even though not FCed or cleared with Easy mods (EZ, HT, NF). If you want, i can post the examples of the maps too! It is worst than ppv1...
And still many CTB maps are overrated in performances!
Skills to Minority Extra map or CTB maps is not skill of all. There are lot of variations.
But i know this ppv2 is not finally decided yet. So i hope to renewing ppv2 consistently.
This system may not be perfect yet, but it's at least starting to go in the right direction, you guys need to chill and give it time to improve.
Topic Starter
Don't worry, the only way for me to know what to improve is listening to the complaints. I don't play CtB myself after all.Zak wrote:
This system may not be perfect yet, but it's at least starting to go in the right direction, you guys need to chill and give it time to improve.
[Super Shock]_old
[Super Shock] wrote:
How can DakkyChan rang 15....DakkyChan wrote:
How can be Zak rank 8 XDDDDD
DeathXHunter
DakkyChan wrote:
How can be Zak rank 8 XDDDDD
lmao119410501 wrote:
DakkyChan wrote:
How can be Zak rank 8 XDDDDDdo you even ask
uguu119410501 wrote:
DakkyChan wrote:
How can be Zak rank 8 XDDDDD
to reply onto the farming case, there are some songs that indeed give a lot of pp with little effort from above average players:
https://osu.ppy.sh/b/161980?m=2 is one case, getting top 200 nets you quite a lot of pp, even when you're at 4.6k pp.
https://osu.ppy.sh/b/55474?m=2 is another example, the intro may be annoying, but its a straight shot to 300 combo, I see why it would give pp because the spacing between the jumps are huge and its pure hypers, but like I said any above average player can easily get accustomed to those jumps and either fc, or even miss once near the end and nets you still some good pp.
https://osu.ppy.sh/b/84485?m=2 the jumps may be annoying but it is definitely doable, only thing I found hard on this is some jump at 369, like I said it gives a lot of pp as well.
although these songs were me experimenting to get under rank 100 with not so much effort, I did in fact move a lot of ranks so far from a few maps. And I'm considering these songs farmable since like I said above average players can do, or fc the songs that I listed with few retries
it does seem massively spaced maps gives a lot of pp too which may be concerning, since some of the maps have a few spots that are considered hard to pass, but require a few attempts to actually get used to it and pass massively large spaced notes.
https://osu.ppy.sh/b/161980?m=2 is one case, getting top 200 nets you quite a lot of pp, even when you're at 4.6k pp.
https://osu.ppy.sh/b/55474?m=2 is another example, the intro may be annoying, but its a straight shot to 300 combo, I see why it would give pp because the spacing between the jumps are huge and its pure hypers, but like I said any above average player can easily get accustomed to those jumps and either fc, or even miss once near the end and nets you still some good pp.
https://osu.ppy.sh/b/84485?m=2 the jumps may be annoying but it is definitely doable, only thing I found hard on this is some jump at 369, like I said it gives a lot of pp as well.
although these songs were me experimenting to get under rank 100 with not so much effort, I did in fact move a lot of ranks so far from a few maps. And I'm considering these songs farmable since like I said above average players can do, or fc the songs that I listed with few retries
it does seem massively spaced maps gives a lot of pp too which may be concerning, since some of the maps have a few spots that are considered hard to pass, but require a few attempts to actually get used to it and pass massively large spaced notes.
---[Super Shock] wrote:
How can DakkyChan rang 13....DakkyChan wrote:
How can be Zak rank 8 XDDDDD
So, from your explanation, if we miss 1 on a map and catch all the droplets, it will give more PP rather than miss loooots of droplets but FC? oh wellKitokofox wrote:
FC shouldn't have to matter too much (Although, it does give a tiny boost) It's more based on score and accuracy than anything now, mostly because of the fact that the only thing that slowly increases when you get better is the accuracy itself. (I feel combo has a somewhat important saying matter in there too)
FC only mattered because often FC means getting good rankings. It's more of "This is the difficulty, how much of the difficulty can you do?" And that's pretty much how pp goes.
It no longer focuses on other players. It tallies up how well YOU do, then compares that tally to others.
Seph
Topic Starter
There was a bug that rated some maps too high. Glee Cast - Friday is one of them, which will get fixed today. Can't say anything definite about the other 2, but the difficulty algorithm will get some adjustments either way.Minky wrote:
to reply onto the farming case, there are some songs that indeed give a lot of pp with little effort from above average players:
https://osu.ppy.sh/b/161980?m=2 is one case, getting top 200 nets you quite a lot of pp, even when you're at 4.6k pp.
https://osu.ppy.sh/b/55474?m=2 is another example, the intro may be annoying, but its a straight shot to 300 combo, I see why it would give pp because the spacing between the jumps are huge and its pure hypers, but like I said any above average player can easily get accustomed to those jumps and either fc, or even miss once near the end and nets you still some good pp.
https://osu.ppy.sh/b/84485?m=2 the jumps may be annoying but it is definitely doable, only thing I found hard on this is some jump at 369, like I said it gives a lot of pp as well.
although these songs were me experimenting to get under rank 100 with not so much effort, I did in fact move a lot of ranks so far from a few maps. And I'm considering these songs farmable since like I said above average players can do, or fc the songs that I listed with few retries
it does seem massively spaced maps gives a lot of pp too which may be concerning, since some of the maps have a few spots that are considered hard to pass, but require a few attempts to actually get used to it and pass massively large spaced notes.
Please someone help the guy outTom94 wrote:
Don't worry, the only way for me to know what to improve is listening to the complaints. I don't play CtB myself after all.Zak wrote:
This system may not be perfect yet, but it's at least starting to go in the right direction, you guys need to chill and give it time to improve.
New PP, new farming maps.Seph wrote:
Well you really can't change the fact that this version of pp still counts map hoarding though.
there will always be maps picked out if you are good enough to farm them, pp can't be changed to a point of progression, ranking is ranking, no way around it i guess, there will always be shortcuts and tricks of the trade.
you should focuse more on AR10 when you play with HR, and AR9 maps with DT have to be rated higher
I have this growing concern that the CTB pros are going to keep complaining about every remotely non-crazy maps giving pp until the only way you can get pp in maps is to FC hyper filled songs that only the top percentiles can play. I agree that it should require effort to be rewarding, but grinding isn't fun. It doesn't show that you're skillful. It only shows that you've played a song enough time to complete it without missing.
This isn't about hard maps giving pp, it's the fact that they should be giving MORE than the not so easy maps, instead of around the same or even less, in ppv1 after getting into around the top 200 getting a good score on a hard map would give nothing unless you get top 20 or so (and sometimes not even then), and that's why ppv2 needs to make maps like that more rewarding.
A nice is example is Kokou no Sousei, in ppv1 rank 4 gave me 0pp but then if I wanted i could go get top 5 on maps that aren't very difficult and I would probably get pp.
None of us are saying that easier end maps shouldn't give pp at all, we're just saying that harder maps need to start giving more so things are somewhat balanced.
A nice is example is Kokou no Sousei, in ppv1 rank 4 gave me 0pp but then if I wanted i could go get top 5 on maps that aren't very difficult and I would probably get pp.
None of us are saying that easier end maps shouldn't give pp at all, we're just saying that harder maps need to start giving more so things are somewhat balanced.
I've been looking around top 50 player's profiles and I see that most of their top performances are basically No mod and HD records. DT, HR, and FL records doesn't seem to have an effect on PP which concerns me. I mean sure the top 5 might have one or two HR records but the vast majority doesn't have theirs shown on their top. Could be a bug?
P.S- Compiling a list of hard maps for CTB would be really helpful to determine which maps should give more than others.
P.S- Compiling a list of hard maps for CTB would be really helpful to determine which maps should give more than others.
Seph
Topic Starter
Such a list is in the opening post of this thread.TenguKing9 wrote:
I've been looking around top 50 player's profiles and I see that most of their top performances are basically No mod and HD records. DT, HR, and FL records doesn't seem to have an effect on PP which concerns me. I mean sure the top 5 might have one or two HR records but the vast majority doesn't have theirs shown on their top. Could be a bug?
P.S- Compiling a list of hard maps for CTB would be really helpful to determine which maps should give more than others.
When did you look through top performances? A bug regarding some nomod weightings has been fixed this morning.
I looked through about 35 mins ago. No mod and HD are fine but HR,DT, and FL are not giving a bonus from what it looks like.Tom94 wrote:
Such a list is in the opening post of this thread.TenguKing9 wrote:
I've been looking around top 50 player's profiles and I see that most of their top performances are basically No mod and HD records. DT, HR, and FL records doesn't seem to have an effect on PP which concerns me. I mean sure the top 5 might have one or two HR records but the vast majority doesn't have theirs shown on their top. Could be a bug?
P.S- Compiling a list of hard maps for CTB would be really helpful to determine which maps should give more than others.
When did you look through top performances? A bug regarding some nomod weightings has been fixed this morning.
Topic Starter
Only if the pro guy literally has one good score and only shit others... which is very unlikely. Believe me, outweighting good plays with worse ones is ridiculously hard in this system, unless map weighting is malfunctioning for easier maps.Seph wrote:
A player who focuses on heavily weighted maps can still be outranked by a player who has played more not-so-hard maps than him.
Like, 50 regular maps > 1 super hard map when it comes to pp gain
I don't really like the list all that much as pretty much everything near the top is unranked, most of those maps I've never even played and I'm not sure just how many people have either to be able to compare difficulty, seeing more of the harder ranked maps would help compare as it's more likely people will know what those play like to be able to compare them properly. It would probably be a good idea to get some higher skilled players who have a pretty good grasp on what makes the maps difficult and have them help out on figuring out a good way to calculate difficulty.
nothing changed on pp v2 in ctb only new farming maps XDDDDDDDDD
If you're going to complain about ppv2 at least try and give advice on how to improve it instead of making pointless posts with no content.DakkyChan wrote:
nothing changed on pp v2 in ctb only new farming maps XDDDDDDDDD
I'm not saying I complain about HOW PP IS, I complain about PP.TheVileOne wrote:
I have this growing concern that the CTB pros are going to keep complaining about every remotely non-crazy maps giving pp until the only way you can get pp in maps is to FC hyper filled songs that only the top percentiles can play. I agree that it should require effort to be rewarding, but grinding isn't fun. It doesn't show that you're skillful. It only shows that you've played a song enough time to complete it without missing.
There's no way to improve pp, make pp a real skills portrait, balance pp maps amounts with pp really hard maps.
PP will never work.
Once again I say it was so pleasant to see players' stats without ranks.
And what I and Dakky said, is just a fact, the unchangeable nature of PP, until it'll exist.
If you don't care about pp what are you doing here andrea, give me some pizza and pasta for jesuschrist.119410501 wrote:
I'm not saying I complain about HOW PP IS, I complain about PP.TheVileOne wrote:
I have this growing concern that the CTB pros are going to keep complaining about every remotely non-crazy maps giving pp until the only way you can get pp in maps is to FC hyper filled songs that only the top percentiles can play. I agree that it should require effort to be rewarding, but grinding isn't fun. It doesn't show that you're skillful. It only shows that you've played a song enough time to complete it without missing.
There's no way to improve pp, make pp a real skills portrait, balance pp maps amounts with pp really hard maps.
PP will never work.
Once again I say it was so pleasant to see players' stats without ranks.
And what I and Dakky said, is just a fact, the unchangeable nature of PP, until it'll exist.
farming posts countseicHmsc wrote:
If you don't care about pp what are you doing here andrea, give me some pizza and pasta for jesuschrist.119410501 wrote:
I'm not saying I complain about HOW PP IS, I complain about PP.
There's no way to improve pp, make pp a real skills portrait, balance pp maps amounts with pp really hard maps.
PP will never work.
Once again I say it was so pleasant to see players' stats without ranks.
And what I and Dakky said, is just a fact, the unchangeable nature of PP, until it'll exist.
no pizza available at 2:10 AM, come back later ! ! !
Seph
That would still mean noobs couldn't farm even a bit, and pros would farm insanesSeph wrote:
The only way to remove PP farming is to not include easy/normals/hards (unless those hards really do give some challenge, besides adding HR/DT)
simply put, manually adding maps, but that would be a pain in the ass
That would kill the majority's fun.Seph wrote:
Well ppv2 is SKILL based, so that just makes sense.
PP for everyone or PP for no one.
And I'd go for the second option.
Why is that necessary?Seph wrote:
The only way to remove PP farming is to not include easy/normals/hards (unless those hards really do give some challenge, besides adding HR/DT)
simply put, manually adding maps, but that would be a pain in the ass
If maps are too easy, then they won't give much pp at all (unless the difficulty calculation algorithm goes horribly wrong).
Example:
A player plays 5000 easy maps, each play worth 100pp. Then it's total pp would be ~1000pp.
Another player plays 1 hard map (worth 300pp), and also has about about 20 plays worth about 200pp. Then it's total would be about ~2100pp
HT and EZ plays shouldn't give that much, I have an HT on my best performance = ='
Seph
how did that become 2100pp when 300+200=500 watFull Tablet wrote:
If maps are too easy, then they won't give much pp at all (unless the difficulty calculation algorithm goes horribly wrong).
Example:
A player plays 5000 easy maps, each play worth 100pp. Then it's total pp would be ~1000pp.
Another player plays 1 hard map (worth 300pp), and also has about about 20 plays worth about 200pp. Then it's total would be about ~2100pp
and who knows, the calculation MIGHT go wrong, and I'm only not referring to easy maps, some
Awarding pp should still be based on relative rank and your relative performances. I believe it still is even with the new changes. It is incorrect to say that removing the value of Easy/Normal/Hard modes will resolve this problem. Noone is saying that Easy/Normal/Hards can be farmed under the new system and unless it is a bug with the system, they shouldn't be able to be farmed under the new system for people who have not moved on to maps far above that skill range.
Think of the ranking system as having invisible tiers. In order to get to the next tier your average performance needs to be at a certain bar. This ensures that noone can farm into ranks they do not deserve. The fact that there are farmable maps (given that these maps are not below the player's assumed skill level for his rank) is a non-issue. A player can farm maps within his skill level all he wants, and his rank will always stay within his invisible tier in which every player around him shares a similar skill level.
The presence of maps that are easier than the average skill level required for a map to give x number of pp are the rogue maps. These maps are the ones that allow players from a lower tier to work their way into a higher tier with a lower degree of effort. These maps should be reduced as much as possible.
Think of the ranking system as having invisible tiers. In order to get to the next tier your average performance needs to be at a certain bar. This ensures that noone can farm into ranks they do not deserve. The fact that there are farmable maps (given that these maps are not below the player's assumed skill level for his rank) is a non-issue. A player can farm maps within his skill level all he wants, and his rank will always stay within his invisible tier in which every player around him shares a similar skill level.
The presence of maps that are easier than the average skill level required for a map to give x number of pp are the rogue maps. These maps are the ones that allow players from a lower tier to work their way into a higher tier with a lower degree of effort. These maps should be reduced as much as possible.
wish i knew how to play with mods :v went from rank 60 usa 1200 overall to 2300 overal and 120~ usa after you fixed the weightedness of no mods
Topic Starter
TheVileOne wrote:
Awarding pp should still be based on relative rank and your relative performances. I believe it still is even with the new changes. It is incorrect to say that removing the value of Easy/Normal/Hard modes will resolve this problem. Noone is saying that Easy/Normal/Hards can be farmed under the new system and unless it is a bug with the system, they shouldn't be able to be farmed under the new system for people who have not moved on to maps far above that skill range.
Think of the ranking system as having invisible tiers. In order to get to the next tier your average performance needs to be at a certain bar. This ensures that noone can farm into ranks they do not deserve. The fact that there are farmable maps (given that these maps are not below the player's assumed skill level for his rank) is a non-issue. A player can farm maps within his skill level all he wants, and his rank will always stay within his invisible tier in which every player around him shares a similar skill level.
The presence of maps that are easier than the average skill level required for a map to give x number of pp are the rogue maps. These maps are the ones that allow players from a lower tier to work their way into a higher tier with a lower degree of effort. These maps should be reduced as much as possible.
I think you both don't quite understand how pp works. The total pp of a player isn't just his 20 best plays added up or something. The plays are individually weighted by how far up they are.Seph wrote:
how did that become 2100pp when 300+200=500 watFull Tablet wrote:
If maps are too easy, then they won't give much pp at all (unless the difficulty calculation algorithm goes horribly wrong).
Example:
A player plays 5000 easy maps, each play worth 100pp. Then it's total pp would be ~1000pp.
Another player plays 1 hard map (worth 300pp), and also has about about 20 plays worth about 200pp. Then it's total would be about ~2100pp
and who knows, the calculation MIGHT go wrong, and I'm only not referring to easy maps, someokayhard diffs (not insanes okay) gives insane amounts of pp, you just gotta look for them. anyhow this still doesn't change the fact that you can still pp hoard so w/e
A player's best play is weighted the most, the second best play a little bit less, the third best play a bit less again, and so on. The exact formula is:
Total pp = (1st Score's pp) * X^0 + (2nd Score's pp) * X^1 + (3rd Score's pp) * X^2 + ... + (nth Score's pp) * X^(n-1)
where is slightly below 1. For instance 0.95.
This way only the best scores of a player are relevant.
If hards, normals or easys are worth too much, then please let me know. It probably is connected to a bug in the algorithm.
I think you both don't quite understand how pp works. The total pp of a player isn't just his 20 best plays added up or something. The plays are individually weighted by how far up they are.i know this isnt a big deal, but do you think you can make it so pp shows up to the 2nd decimal? right now if you have 3000.05 pp it only shows up as 3000 pp, would make tracking pp easier for players especially since most people are probably only getting a fragment of 1 pp per map
A player's best play is weighted the most, the second best play a little bit less, the third best play a bit less again, and so on. The exact formula is:
Total pp = (1st Score's pp) * X^0 + (2nd Score's pp) * X^1 + (3rd Score's pp) * X^2 + ... + (nth Score's pp) * X^(n-1)
where is slightly below 1. For instance 0.95.
This way only the best scores of a player are relevant.
If hards, normals or easys are worth too much, then please let me know. It probably is connected to a bug in the algorithm.
I was aware with how pp is weighted. I have to deal with many issues concerning pp. My concept of invisible tiers still applies if the pp system is truly worth its salt. If pp does not indicate that player A is performing better than player B, then I don't see the point to having pp at all. There needs to be invisible bars in which a player must have a baseline level of skill/performance to reach such a rank.
The high end of the player's performance list should be a representation of a player's skill level. That way only similarly skilled players will be grouped together on the ranking list. It doesn't matter where on the ranking list you are among this group of people, because all of you share very similar skill ranges. For example I am ranked within the 1500-~2800 ranking tier in CTB. Most players within this rank are at or above my skill level. There shouldn't be very many below my general skill level at my rank.
The high end of the player's performance list should be a representation of a player's skill level. That way only similarly skilled players will be grouped together on the ranking list. It doesn't matter where on the ranking list you are among this group of people, because all of you share very similar skill ranges. For example I am ranked within the 1500-~2800 ranking tier in CTB. Most players within this rank are at or above my skill level. There shouldn't be very many below my general skill level at my rank.
theres a very simple reason as to why we need pp, osu was and should always be considered competitive, having fun is just part of the game, we need some form of ranking system or a significant portion of the players (myself included, and quite a bit of people i know) will stop playing out of boredom, i stopped playing osu after the pp system went down because it was boring, i didnt feel i was getting better (simply being able to beat a map i couldnt beat before does not mean i got better, it just means ive played the song enough to not miss on it (someone else in this thread agrees with me on this aspect)TheVileOne wrote:
I was aware with how pp is weighted. I have to deal with many issues concerning pp. My concept of invisible tiers still applies if the pp system is truly worth its salt. If pp does not indicate that player A is performing better than player B, then I don't see the point to having pp at all. There needs to be invisible bars in which a player must have a baseline level of skill/performance to reach such a rank.
The high end of the player's performance list should be a representation of a player's skill level. That way only similarly skilled players will be grouped together on the ranking list. It doesn't matter where on the ranking list you are among this group of people, because all of you share very similar skill ranges. For example I am ranked within the 1500-~2800 ranking tier in CTB. Most players within this rank are at or above my skill level. There shouldn't be very many below my general skill level at my rank.
it's march and people are still having problems on if pp or ranking should exist in the game, the answer is yes, if there is no ranking then theres no competitive value, if you want to be a casual then you already are one, you've been one since you started this game, idk why people get this idea that casual's didn't exist in ppv1, i can name like 20 off the top of my head, just don't play the game for ranks but for fun, so why in your mind you think that you have complain and say ranking is stupid, a lot of people in this thread would have not got better if it wasn't for those hours and weeks of grinding one map to show people that your a fruit catching badass LOL -cough cough 119- also to provide ppv2 feedback, make maps that not a lot of people FC, very heavily weighed, like distorted love song or Atama no Taisou [Angel Honey] Dakky is #1 with HR, I'm not sure why that's not on top 5 performances, because if you can pull that off, then your good as fark, that is the #1 thing that bothers me in ppv2, when HR is not special and being top 8 on a very difficult map.-Tachibana- wrote:
theres a very simple reason as to why we need pp, osu was and should always be considered competitive, having fun is just part of the game, we need some form of ranking system or a significant portion of the players (myself included, and quite a bit of people i know) will stop playing out of boredom, i stopped playing osu after the pp system went down because it was boring, i didnt feel i was getting better (simply being able to beat a map i couldnt beat before does not mean i got better, it just means ive played the song enough to not miss on it (someone else in this thread agrees with me on this aspect)TheVileOne wrote:
I was aware with how pp is weighted. I have to deal with many issues concerning pp. My concept of invisible tiers still applies if the pp system is truly worth its salt. If pp does not indicate that player A is performing better than player B, then I don't see the point to having pp at all. There needs to be invisible bars in which a player must have a baseline level of skill/performance to reach such a rank.
The high end of the player's performance list should be a representation of a player's skill level. That way only similarly skilled players will be grouped together on the ranking list. It doesn't matter where on the ranking list you are among this group of people, because all of you share very similar skill ranges. For example I am ranked within the 1500-~2800 ranking tier in CTB. Most players within this rank are at or above my skill level. There shouldn't be very many below my general skill level at my rank.
We don't neccessarily need pp for competition. If you want real competition then join a multiplayer match. Tells you more about your actual skill than some inaccurate number. There are players having a lower pp rank than me who can easily beat me in a match.
Sure, there are different things you can have fun in the game. Fun to farm pp, or in my case, fun to farm a lot of score. But most importantly, I have fun with the game itself and not just advancing in some ranking. If you quit when there is no ranking around it means to me you don't have fun with the game itself enough.
I don't value the pp system, but I also don't mind having it around. I will always be a casual player.
And to be more ontopic again: Mods definitely need to be weighted more than they are now.
CTB diffs are way too overrated and so are maps with lots of long jump. Maps with a lot of weird converted patterns aren't mentioned at all.
I think this first needs a review, because maybe calculation wrong on this kind of maps?
Sure, there are different things you can have fun in the game. Fun to farm pp, or in my case, fun to farm a lot of score. But most importantly, I have fun with the game itself and not just advancing in some ranking. If you quit when there is no ranking around it means to me you don't have fun with the game itself enough.
I don't value the pp system, but I also don't mind having it around. I will always be a casual player.
And to be more ontopic again: Mods definitely need to be weighted more than they are now.
CTB diffs are way too overrated and so are maps with lots of long jump. Maps with a lot of weird converted patterns aren't mentioned at all.
I think this first needs a review, because maybe calculation wrong on this kind of maps?
Topic Starter
But that's what the current weighting already does. Instead of having fixed hard-thresholds it's a smooth function. No other difference.TheVileOne wrote:
I was aware with how pp is weighted. I have to deal with many issues concerning pp. My concept of invisible tiers still applies if the pp system is truly worth its salt. If pp does not indicate that player A is performing better than player B, then I don't see the point to having pp at all. There needs to be invisible bars in which a player must have a baseline level of skill/performance to reach such a rank.
The high end of the player's performance list should be a representation of a player's skill level. That way only similarly skilled players will be grouped together on the ranking list. It doesn't matter where on the ranking list you are among this group of people, because all of you share very similar skill ranges. For example I am ranked within the 1500-~2800 ranking tier in CTB. Most players within this rank are at or above my skill level. There shouldn't be very many below my general skill level at my rank.
If I were to implement hard thresholds, then pp gain would become very jumpy, unpredictable and illogical in various corner cases. It's not be a good idea and it's result in lots of confusion and complaints due to the jumpy nature. Just look at how many complaints already exist about "I didn't get pp but i should!!!" or "this map gave me more than the other!!!". Those scenarios would become common as part of the system.
I support that, it will do pp more intuitive imo because you can do an insane map and get 0.05 pp, and you know that your work is recognized.-Tachibana- wrote:
i know this isnt a big deal, but do you think you can make it so pp shows up to the 2nd decimal? right now if you have 3000.05 pp it only shows up as 3000 pp, would make tracking pp easier for players especially since most people are probably only getting a fragment of 1 pp per map
FYI I was not making a suggestion. I was only making a response addresses to those who are thinking that farming is an issue with the new system. There should be no way to farm your way into a rank that doesn't reflect your capable level of play compared to those around your rank, at least when you get into the top 5000. If you find maps that constantly give you pp, then these maps should be considered more difficult than maps that were rated as giving less pp in your list of performances (before weighting).
There is usually some wiggle room as you move into the next tier of play. Someone who mysteriously one day starts playing songs with more proficiency, and starts performing well at songs he could not previously compete will find himself rapidly moving up the ranks, because each one of these plays will be better than plays he previously acquired. He/she is moving towards the next tier of skill/performance in the ranking. You could call this rapid gain of pp by playing better as farming. Farming is not a bad thing if it is because the player is truly getting better at playing or just playing better.
There is no amount of farming I could do to get me to rank 1500 from where I am at. It would take many many tries to get to the next tier. I am probably underestimating how much pp it takes to progress x number of ranks. I am curious about what percentile of plays in your performance list have considerable impact on your rank. What range is the bulk of your pp located? At what point is the worth of a performance is greatly diminished or doesn't have a very high impact on rank?
Will you and do you collect data on performance trends? Maybe it would be useful to analyze such data in order to determine problems with the system, and just for statistics reasons. I guess it doesn't have to be publicly available to prevent people from maximizing their pp, by filling their lists with similarly valued songs within their skill level, but some data might be safe to release.
You could allow us to view how our pp is distributed amongst our top 1000 performances. (Is it still only 1000 or did you happen to include more plays?) We could then infer things about our own true skill levels based on whether our pp values are based on a few songs or the culmination of many songs. We could have an average performance that will tell us where we are in terms of skill level. Are we better at aim, or accuracy? Do we prefer a certain mod? What mods do other player prefer at x rank? There is a ton of data that can plotted into graphs that could be used to evaluate one person's skill level to another person's and not only one facet of skill, but several different facets.
Tell me if this is better written in a feature request.
There is usually some wiggle room as you move into the next tier of play. Someone who mysteriously one day starts playing songs with more proficiency, and starts performing well at songs he could not previously compete will find himself rapidly moving up the ranks, because each one of these plays will be better than plays he previously acquired. He/she is moving towards the next tier of skill/performance in the ranking. You could call this rapid gain of pp by playing better as farming. Farming is not a bad thing if it is because the player is truly getting better at playing or just playing better.
There is no amount of farming I could do to get me to rank 1500 from where I am at. It would take many many tries to get to the next tier. I am probably underestimating how much pp it takes to progress x number of ranks. I am curious about what percentile of plays in your performance list have considerable impact on your rank. What range is the bulk of your pp located? At what point is the worth of a performance is greatly diminished or doesn't have a very high impact on rank?
Will you and do you collect data on performance trends? Maybe it would be useful to analyze such data in order to determine problems with the system, and just for statistics reasons. I guess it doesn't have to be publicly available to prevent people from maximizing their pp, by filling their lists with similarly valued songs within their skill level, but some data might be safe to release.
You could allow us to view how our pp is distributed amongst our top 1000 performances. (Is it still only 1000 or did you happen to include more plays?) We could then infer things about our own true skill levels based on whether our pp values are based on a few songs or the culmination of many songs. We could have an average performance that will tell us where we are in terms of skill level. Are we better at aim, or accuracy? Do we prefer a certain mod? What mods do other player prefer at x rank? There is a ton of data that can plotted into graphs that could be used to evaluate one person's skill level to another person's and not only one facet of skill, but several different facets.
Tell me if this is better written in a feature request.
Topic Starter
Yup, there is analyzing happening. Having the weights display in the best performances also is an option.TheVileOne wrote:
FYI I was not making a suggestion. I was only making a response addresses to those who are thinking that farming is an issue with the new system. There should be no way to farm your way into a rank that doesn't reflect your capable level of play compared to those around your rank, at least when you get into the top 5000. If you find maps that constantly give you pp, then these maps should be considered more difficult than maps that were rated as giving less pp in your list of performances (before weighting).
There is usually some wiggle room as you move into the next tier of play. Someone who mysteriously one day starts playing songs with more proficiency, and starts performing well at songs he could not previously compete will find himself rapidly moving up the ranks, because each one of these plays will be better than plays he previously acquired. He/she is moving towards the next tier of skill/performance in the ranking. You could call this rapid gain of pp by playing better as farming. Farming is not a bad thing if it is because the player is truly getting better at playing or just playing better.
There is no amount of farming I could do to get me to rank 1500 from where I am at. It would take many many tries to get to the next tier. I am probably underestimating how much pp it takes to progress x number of ranks. I am curious about what percentile of plays in your performance list have considerable impact on your rank. What range is the bulk of your pp located? At what point is the worth of a performance is greatly diminished or doesn't have a very high impact on rank?
Will you and do you collect data on performance trends? Maybe it would be useful to analyze such data in order to determine problems with the system, and just for statistics reasons. I guess it doesn't have to be publicly available to prevent people from maximizing their pp, by filling their lists with similarly valued songs within their skill level, but some data might be safe to release.
You could allow us to view how our pp is distributed amongst our top 1000 performances. (Is it still only 1000 or did you happen to include more plays?) We could then infer things about our own true skill levels based on whether our pp values are based on a few songs or the culmination of many songs. We could have an average performance that will tell us where we are in terms of skill level. Are we better at aim, or accuracy? Do we prefer a certain mod? What mods do other player prefer at x rank? There is a ton of data that can plotted into graphs that could be used to evaluate one person's skill level to another person's and not only one facet of skill, but several different facets.
Actually all plays are included, but capping it at 1000 wouldn't really make any difference. It'd be less than 0.000000001 pp.
As a general guideline: Your best play is worth all of its pp. Your 20th play is worth around 38% of its pp and your 50th best play if worth around 8.1% of its pp. Your 100th best play is at 0.6%, which gets close to worthless.
Yes, X is 0.95, saving those the hassle who want to reverse-engineer it from those values.
Displaying seperate performance stats like aim, speed, acc and so on is something I wish can be done at some point.
And will there be a strong relation between the difficulty rating of a map and how much pp it will be worth? Will the rating be adjusted when you add mods?
I kind of want to know what can be inferred about our top performances. Will they represent maps that are relatively high in difficulty in general and all maps with that general difficulty rating will be evaluated similarly? I want to know why my current top 10 performances are more special than all the other plays I make.
Look at https://osu.ppy.sh/p/beatmap?b=86044&m=2
I am ranked #293 with 3417 combo. Sure I don't use a mod, but it's a marathon map. It's easier to miss and there are jumps in it. High combo doesn't seem to matter as much. I'm not sure where this is in comparison to my top performances, but I feel it's better than some of the performances that I have in my top 10. I'm not playing with hidden like the songs in my top list, but 3417 combo has to be worth a top spot over a hidden play. The top player on the score board has missing fruits and noone has set a score with no missed fruits. 17 players overall set a score with hidden at the top ranks and the top ranks list is littered with multiple fruit misses and the top no mod play has 3795 combo.
Is it because my accuracy (99.06%) is bringing the performance down? It is common to see misses when it comes to marathon maps. I think you should be giving extra weight for keeping combo in longer maps. Even if most of it is streams instead of aim intensive patterns, it's easier to make a mistake and it ruins your chance at a top ranking. You can't easily perform well on these maps, because of how much time it takes to get consistent at them.
Also keep in mind for this case that a large amount of my missed fruits is because of the harder part of the song halfway in. Most players will miss at that one pattern.
Are stream filled maps without intense jumps considered relatively low in difficulty? I would think that stream filled marathon maps should be rated fairly high in difficulty to FC. If you consider each element individually, then it's not that difficult, but together you still need to hit dozens of different patterns, and there are jumps (hyper and otherwise) spread throughout the difficulty. The chance that you will screw up somewhere is very high. The same goes for other fast stream maps. Even a very small mistake will influence a miss and basically require a restart of the map in order to compete.
I kind of want to know what can be inferred about our top performances. Will they represent maps that are relatively high in difficulty in general and all maps with that general difficulty rating will be evaluated similarly? I want to know why my current top 10 performances are more special than all the other plays I make.
Look at https://osu.ppy.sh/p/beatmap?b=86044&m=2
I am ranked #293 with 3417 combo. Sure I don't use a mod, but it's a marathon map. It's easier to miss and there are jumps in it. High combo doesn't seem to matter as much. I'm not sure where this is in comparison to my top performances, but I feel it's better than some of the performances that I have in my top 10. I'm not playing with hidden like the songs in my top list, but 3417 combo has to be worth a top spot over a hidden play. The top player on the score board has missing fruits and noone has set a score with no missed fruits. 17 players overall set a score with hidden at the top ranks and the top ranks list is littered with multiple fruit misses and the top no mod play has 3795 combo.
Is it because my accuracy (99.06%) is bringing the performance down? It is common to see misses when it comes to marathon maps. I think you should be giving extra weight for keeping combo in longer maps. Even if most of it is streams instead of aim intensive patterns, it's easier to make a mistake and it ruins your chance at a top ranking. You can't easily perform well on these maps, because of how much time it takes to get consistent at them.
Also keep in mind for this case that a large amount of my missed fruits is because of the harder part of the song halfway in. Most players will miss at that one pattern.
Are stream filled maps without intense jumps considered relatively low in difficulty? I would think that stream filled marathon maps should be rated fairly high in difficulty to FC. If you consider each element individually, then it's not that difficult, but together you still need to hit dozens of different patterns, and there are jumps (hyper and otherwise) spread throughout the difficulty. The chance that you will screw up somewhere is very high. The same goes for other fast stream maps. Even a very small mistake will influence a miss and basically require a restart of the map in order to compete.
thats not soo true, it's not as draining to focus in CTB as in Stanadard aslong the AR and CS are not to high, for example i played paramax 7xtimes and always FC'ed it. same with most other marathons i tried more then onesTheVileOne wrote:
I think you should be giving extra weight for keeping combo in longer maps. Even if most of it is streams instead of aim intensive patterns, it's easier to make a mistake and it ruins your chance at a top ranking. You can't easily perform well on these maps, because of how much time it takes to get consistent at them
I'm referring to stream related marathons. I'm thinking that in this particular cases and perhaps others that difficulty is being downgraded, because of all the streams in between each jumpy pattern. We're talking about a map that literally has no one person on the list who has not missed a fruit (fruit, not droplet). The streams require constant left and right adjustments to hit. It's not like all the fruits are in straight lines for most of the time.
Maybe it's not an issue. It's hard to say until I know what level the song is. Anyways I think that getting over 3000 combo is this song in CTB is impressive. It may not be top tier, super omg difficult to do, but it shows that you can play long bouts of constant gameplay sections without missing.
Maybe it's not an issue. It's hard to say until I know what level the song is. Anyways I think that getting over 3000 combo is this song in CTB is impressive. It may not be top tier, super omg difficult to do, but it shows that you can play long bouts of constant gameplay sections without missing.
i agree with vile, stamina (or concentration, what ever you wanna call it) is definitely a skill that should be thrown into the equation, clearly if no one has ever gotten a FC on the song, even if it isnt ar10 it shows that the song is hard enough to warrant more pp
which brings me to another suggestion on top of the showing decimal points for pp
you should make it so pp is weighted based on performance (like it is now) but also based on the other players who played the map, for example if i fc a song as a rank 2000 that even a rank 100 couldnt fc (with the same mods) i should get more pp (because at the very least, in this map i am better than the rank 100 player)
which brings me to another suggestion on top of the showing decimal points for pp
you should make it so pp is weighted based on performance (like it is now) but also based on the other players who played the map, for example if i fc a song as a rank 2000 that even a rank 100 couldnt fc (with the same mods) i should get more pp (because at the very least, in this map i am better than the rank 100 player)
what......lol. i completely disagree with this,no point.-Tachibana- wrote:
i agree with vile, stamina (or concentration, what ever you wanna call it) is definitely a skill that should be thrown into the equation, clearly if no one has ever gotten a FC on the song, even if it isnt ar10 it shows that the song is hard enough to warrant more pp
which brings me to another suggestion on top of the showing decimal points for pp
you should make it so pp is weighted based on performance (like it is now) but also based on the other players who played the map, for example if i fc a song as a rank 2000 that even a rank 100 couldnt fc (with the same mods) i should get more pp (because at the very least, in this map i am better than the rank 100 player)
-Ryuujii- wrote:
what......lol. i completely disagree with this,no point.-Tachibana- wrote:
i agree with vile, stamina (or concentration, what ever you wanna call it) is definitely a skill that should be thrown into the equation, clearly if no one has ever gotten a FC on the song, even if it isnt ar10 it shows that the song is hard enough to warrant more pp
which brings me to another suggestion on top of the showing decimal points for pp
you should make it so pp is weighted based on performance (like it is now) but also based on the other players who played the map, for example if i fc a song as a rank 2000 that even a rank 100 couldnt fc (with the same mods) i should get more pp (because at the very least, in this map i am better than the rank 100 player)
ill give you an example, are you saying that marathon runners are not equally if not more fit than sprinters?
Sprinters are more muscular.-Tachibana- wrote:
ill give you an example, are you saying that marathon runners are not equally if not more fit than sprinters?
my point is, most sprinters cant beat marathon runners in long distance running and most marathon runners will probably lose to a sprinter in a 100m dashFull Tablet wrote:
Sprinters are more muscular.-Tachibana- wrote:
ill give you an example, are you saying that marathon runners are not equally if not more fit than sprinters?
The example makes sense, but it's not good at all, pretty much anyone who's high in ranks can beat out all lower tier players on any marathon, it's just that they don't play those marathons often because they find it too boring.
DeletedUser_500696
Are CTB diffs still weighted more heavily than converts just because they have a ctb tag on them? I'm wondering because most of my best performance are still ctb rain diffs, which aren't all that hard at all compared to other maps I've fc'ed/performed well on. Also, I think the 'jumpiness' contribution towards ctb pp needs to be reevaluated, as hyperdases alter the difficulty of a jump (usually makes it easier). So just because a map has back and forth jumps across the edge of the screen (ex: https://osu.ppy.sh/b/55474?m=2), that does not necessarily mean it should be weighted as more difficult than jumps that are closer together (ex: https://osu.ppy.sh/p/beatmap?b=108021&m=2). The second example is significantly more difficult and I think most players would agree, yet the first gives a ton of pp despite the hyperdashes which assist in the jumps.
Topic Starter
CTB diffs and converts are treated completely equally.-Kurisu- wrote:
Are CTB diffs still weighted more heavily than converts just because they have a ctb tag on them? I'm wondering because most of my best performance are still ctb rain diffs, which aren't all that hard at all compared to other maps I've fc'ed/performed well on. Also, I think the 'jumpiness' contribution towards ctb pp needs to be reevaluated, as hyperdases alter the difficulty of a jump (usually makes it easier). So just because a map has back and forth jumps across the edge of the screen (ex: https://osu.ppy.sh/b/55474?m=2), that does not necessarily mean it should be weighted as more difficult than jumps that are closer together (ex: https://osu.ppy.sh/p/beatmap?b=108021&m=2). The second example is significantly more difficult and I think most players would agree, yet the first gives a ton of pp despite the hyperdashes which assist in the jumps.
And yes, it is a current limitation of the system, that hyperdashes get overvalues which I hope to fix soon by employing a better solution. I already have a few idea in mind, which is have to experiment with.
Topic Starter
TheVileOne wrote:
I'm referring to stream related marathons. I'm thinking that in this particular cases and perhaps others that difficulty is being downgraded, because of all the streams in between each jumpy pattern. We're talking about a map that literally has no one person on the list who has not missed a fruit (fruit, not droplet). The streams require constant left and right adjustments to hit. It's not like all the fruits are in straight lines for most of the time.
Maybe it's not an issue. It's hard to say until I know what level the song is. Anyways I think that getting over 3000 combo is this song in CTB is impressive. It may not be top tier, super omg difficult to do, but it shows that you can play long bouts of constant gameplay sections without missing.
Map length is already considered, but it caps at around a 1500-2000 combo. Might increase that, but I'd have to experiment with how it'd interact with other maps.
Seph
Topic Starter
I should probably increase the AR bonus above AR9.Seph wrote:
ranked 8 on image material and it never even gave anything :v actually ranked down after that lmao
By the way, as I already said over 9000 times, what #rank you have on a map is completely irrelevant for pp calculations. That being said you shouldn't expect to get much pp from a score with that many misses. As I already said in various other threads pp measures "performance". If you can't play a map close to perfection, then pp won't award you much, even if it's hard. Otherwise anyone could just go DT Tag4 maps with a bunch of misses and expect good pp from it.
This also has technical reasons, by the way. With per-hitobject data i could make the miss malus a lot less prevailant.
i have a question, are the ranks we have now going to stay the way they are, is the system already done and finished or ranks will change again?
I'm pretty sure they'll change again, since many of my best performance are still noob diffs.-Ryuujii- wrote:
i have a question, are the ranks we have now going to stay the way they are, is the system already done and finished or ranks will change again?
It must be change because still there are many problems i think.119410501 wrote:
I'm pretty sure they'll change again, since many of my best performance are still noob diffs.-Ryuujii- wrote:
i have a question, are the ranks we have now going to stay the way they are, is the system already done and finished or ranks will change again?
1. Some many not difficult maps in best performance.
2. Still big pp is too concentrated to many CTB diffs or jumping maps. It must be dispersed to other hard standard maps and balance maps (Ex : http://osu.ppy.sh/p/beatmap?b=93893&m=2, http://osu.ppy.sh/p/beatmap?b=25580&m=2), old maps
3. If you "just clear" big pp map (Ex : http://osu.ppy.sh/p/beatmap?b=104229&m=2, http://osu.ppy.sh/p/beatmap?b=55474&m=2, etc...), you can receive big pp "unconditional" (Although cleared with Easy mods (EZ,HT,NF) or not rank in #50 Scoreboard)
4. Still there are no bonus for HR, in high CS and DT, FL in high AR
At the end not everyone will be happy with any system that ends coming out , since it's nearly impossible to get a "fair" ranking system on a game like osu. Due to the all songs Difficulties and such. But it doesn't mean it can't be a bit fair, but having easy,normal or just pure ctb difficulties on your top performances is bad in my opinion. Tom doesn't know that much or maybe nothing about ctb ,therefore that's why he wants all you "omg I hate this system" guys to give him feedback. But if someone that knows 0 about ctb comes and gives feedback ...the circlejerk of hating the system will continue. So please people that know about ctb enough, give your opinion and help tom. thank you.
PPv1 considered those though. So I don't see why now the system is actually worse.-PM- wrote:
It must be change because still there are many problems i think.119410501 wrote:
I'm pretty sure they'll change again, since many of my best performance are still noob diffs.
1. Some many not difficult maps in best performance.
2. Still big pp is too concentrated to many CTB diffs or jumping maps. It must be dispersed to other hard standard maps and balance maps (Ex : http://osu.ppy.sh/p/beatmap?b=93893&m=2, http://osu.ppy.sh/p/beatmap?b=25580&m=2), old maps
3. If you "just clear" big pp map (Ex : http://osu.ppy.sh/p/beatmap?b=104229&m=2, http://osu.ppy.sh/p/beatmap?b=55474&m=2, etc...), you can receive big pp "unconditional" (Although cleared with Easy mods (EZ,HT,NF) or not rank in #50 Scoreboard)
4. Still there are no bonus for HR, in high CS and DT, FL in high AR
Topic Starter
HardRock _is_ considered by quite a bit. All maps are weighted equally, CTB maps don't get any bonus just because they're CTB-specific.
DeathXHunter
But they give way more credit than they should get just because they're mapped with alot of distance. For example http://osu.ppy.sh/b/245184?m=2 has alot of long distance jumps but i don't think it's a hard map,at all. At least not harder than alot of plays I and other players did.
The only reason why CtB specific maps seems to be more weighted is that CtB maps are jumpy maps, and jumps are really important with this new pp, right?Tom94 wrote:
HardRock _is_ considered by quite a bit. All maps are weighted equally, CTB maps don't get any bonus just because they're CTB-specific.
@All So, stop saying that CtB maps are.. balh blah, ifTom says are weighted equally it's true ^^
then try to focus on jumps complexity instead of jumps distance, it's true that my map, romaji voice is not that hard, because the jumps are big but not complicated.
Now the problem is to know how to change the algorithm to detect "complex" jumps, it's hard point because the concept "complex" referring to jumps is not defined so good i guess.seicHmsc wrote:
then try to focus on jumps complexity instead of jumps distance, it's true that my map, romaji voice is not that hard, because the jumps are big but not complicated.
Edit: I want to say it's hard to compute mathematically a complex jump because is hard to detect only with formulas.
give examples of complex jumps, i can't do it now
seicHmsc wrote:
give examples of complex jumps, i can't do it now
I gave up active playing so i dont have many examples
, maybe 119410501 can help in that, he is more active actually.mikheeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee <3
Velps, illuminate us with your experience in that game on impossible/complex jumps. I think we can do, all together, a fair system that can detect complex jumps and compute it correctly
Eh not sure if the ctb community considers it complex or not. But having a large non hyper jump right after a hyper jump can be more precise than if there was two regular large jumps. I have already mentioned that jump chaining is more difficult than regular standalone jumps, especially non-hyper chains. Hyper and non-hyper 1/2th node jumps that increase in spacing with each jump are quite tricky to time. Chains that suddenly become regular jumps after several hypers are slightly more difficult due to the first reason I presented. Jumps that start or end with horizontal mini-repeat sliders or wide wigglies are more precise, because you need to keep the ryuuta in a particular place to avoid missing a fruit when going for the jump.
Eh that's all that I can think of at the moment.
Eh that's all that I can think of at the moment.
Exactly. Few examples:TheVileOne wrote:
Eh not sure if the ctb community considers it complex or not. But having a large non hyper jump right after a hyper jump can be more precise than if there was two regular large jumps.
They are even so precise that you need huge amount of luck to hit them properly
Maps like (Sticks and Stones) became maybe even close to impossible to do because of the incredible accurate timing you need
So this kind of maps should give a good amount pp if you manage to FC them
I agree with mikhe.mikhe wrote:
then try to focus on jumps complexity instead of jumps distance, it's true that my map, romaji voice is not that hard, because the jumps are big but not complicated.
Now the problem is to know how to change the algorithm to detect "complex" jumps, it's hard point because the concept "complex" referring to jumps is not defined so good i guess.
Edit: I want to say it's hard to compute mathematically a complex jump because is hard to detect only with formulas.
so i think pp calculation should based from how "complexity" the jumps instead of distance.
but the main problem, to explain the "complexity" itself is more than hard.
also,
based from TheVileOne's quote. I also want to mention, there are many jumps are harder or chained jumps instead of distance jump.TheVileOne wrote:
But having a large non hyper jump right after a hyper jump can be more precise than if there was two regular large jumps. I have already mentioned that jump chaining is more difficult than regular standalone jumps, especially non-hyper chains. Hyper and non-hyper 1/2th node jumps that increase in spacing with each jump are quite tricky to time. Chains that suddenly become regular jumps after several hypers are slightly more difficult due to the first reason I presented. Jumps that start or end with horizontal mini-repeat sliders or wide wigglies are more precise, because you need to keep the ryuuta in a particular place to avoid missing a fruit when going for the jump.
also, based from my experience. there are many sides to see & to compare for the "complexity" jump itself .
so, my suggest. how about making a new pp convertion maps based from CTB maps(ranked/pending or even **** ctb map) or Some maps that "have complex jump". I think with that method, player can understand & give their feedback & suggest better to explain the "complexity" itself.
also. I think with this method will solve more problem than "pp calculations"
These types of patterns should be factored into the difficulty level of the map to begin with. The amount of pp a map is worth is based on this difficulty rating. I think that complex patterns are already considered towards the difficulty value. This value determines how much pp a map is worth. There is already calculations going on, but we don't know the exact values of maps yet.