How about making rolls and spins not count in the pp system?
From what I'm gathering, the converted maps feature far more of these.
From what I'm gathering, the converted maps feature far more of these.
show more
As for giving weights based on patterns, how to we judge the pattern is hard or not? Different people have different playstyles, and different people have different opinions on patterns. Like me I still think dkkdkkd and kdkkdkkd is hard but dddkkkddd and kkkdddkkk is easier...
Also no matter how long the patterns are, the complexity of it still comes down by splitting them into simpler patterns.. For example, splitting a pattern like kkdddkdddkdkkkdkkkddkkd can also be split like kk dddk dddk dkkk dkkk ddkkd, which makes managing patterns easier
Everyone else is saying "no no no make taiko specific worth much more" But, in my opinion, converts should be worth ALMOST as much as taiko specific since some can be difficult. Not all converts are great but, they shouldn't be worth too little.
And that take us to another argument against converted maps, because if you don't consider patterns, then maps with ddddd/kkkkk (Most common 1/4 streams in converted) will be rated harder because it will increase density.
supplementary the some my feelings.
FL made the too many player angry. we should not be a memorize the diffs. because Taiko is a rhythm game i think.
well, in some cases need the memorize. e.g. : complex stream pattern, weird rhythm by song....
but this is nothing to do with memorize for FL.
DS is too easy in taiko, FL is not an exaggeration to say mod for DS players.
HD+HR also similar to FL.
this combination is not working nearly the on taiko.
1, wide screen is so advantageous.
2, memorize must be to some extent.
3, same as FL, cause make the DS player.
anyway i fully agree to Oh no sakihito.
i omitted about hitsound patterns because subjectivity is too big.
2. If you're talking about the score multiplier, no. As I've stated before, FL gives lesser raw-skilled players an opportunity to compete evenly with higher raw-skilled players. If you're talking about the pp, I'm fine with that, but don't nerf it that much though.
As for HDHR, it actually worths more pp, as HR also amplifies the invisibility area of HD (yes, I think that way), making it as it is now. But then again, that's just my opinion.
2nd line: I'd rather not, but I do have few things in mind:
1. Make osu! so that it can track the total number of plays for each song, even in offline/Autoplay? And more specifically, separate numbers of online, offline, and Auto plays? (mentioned Auto since some players memorize from the Autoplay (this guy, for example))
2. FL-specific: Set some kind of threshold of number of plays (like the above number 1) in each map, so that any number below that threshold can be assured as DS?
^ I do realize that it's nearly impossible, but once it is done right, voila. Of course, a formula must be present in order to achieve this one, although I haven't thought anyhow.
3. Make osu! so that it automatically ends/fails a play if it reaches an amount of X consecutive misses, especially if it's from the first note? Take X = 30 notes, for example. Note that this effectively applies only to Taiko since all the other game modes fail immediately when the HP's empty.
I think that's all I can say for now; got a bit exhausted from homework.
and I think to calculate the difficulty, note density and OD is enough..what do u think TKS?
For the purpose of discussion, we could say that we should be focusing on the default key setup to play with, and that is zxcv in a kddk setup though. That's a more valid argument in my opinion.
osu!standard has nothing in the difficulty formula in the patterns being played by different playstyles (mouse only, tablet + kb, lmb/x, etc), so I'd suggest to keep our taiko that way as well, meaning, it matters little if a pattern is easier or harder on a certain key setup.
And to Ono: if HDHR and HDFL really become Doron mode, it will be a great help to taiko world of course.
- Both play styles have similarity, but kddk should be considered due to previous said reasons.
If FL =1.06x then both in pp and in score HDHRFL is more than DT only , that can't be accepted I think.
Since this playstyle is the most "optimal" the difficulty should be calculated with the playstyle that makes the game easier imo.
i'm late to the party but i think rankings would be boring without converted maps since tvsize hr SSx3000
i've generally been avoiding ranked taiko maps for the last couple months because 95% of them just aren't fun
i could understand converted being worth less pp than taiko due to ranking guidelines and things but you can't ignore the fact that some converted maps take just as much if not more skill* to play
*there is no clear definition of skill, i personally see it as acc + reading/playing patterns (especially high speed)
these 2 maps took hours worth of tries and i consider them to be some of my best scores
https://osu.ppy.sh/p/beatmap?b=272454&m=1
https://osu.ppy.sh/p/beatmap?b=127846&m=1
or take this map, 1 try SS that i wouldn't even blink at if there weren't so few others
https://osu.ppy.sh/b/287463
this should not be worth more than the above maps just because it's specifically for taiko
Totally disagree sorry.
First don't call a patten random, no patten is random only if you map in random mood and make it shit. Every patten have its meaning and effect in the map. If the map continue to repeat a patten it looks shit already. And I assume mapper talking in here are not mapping shit.
If you really think a patten is random you should play more and you will not think in that way.
Second in a player's angle, I actually don't know how many times the patten(e.g ddk) have appeared. I play when I see the patten, no matter if that patten appear before. The most extreme case is this.
And on your logic, you think that the program should only check how many times a patten appeared? Then the example map given is really easy right? Please explain on your point on this.
Patterns that don't require leading hand switches are automatically more regular and repetitive. And I don't read streams as a single unit either, I do break them up into parts (albeit using a different "algorithm" than EBAWER); when playing long Firce-style deathstreams I hardly ever miss because I misread, I miss because I mechanically mess up a leading hand switch.
I'd also like to repeat that I don't think every stream with hand switches is extremely hard; I already mentioned before that something like kddkddkddkddkddkddkddkddk is simple due to repetition. It's the irregularity of pattern / hand switches that makes a stream truly hard.
Anyway, for the example:
Is not the hardest part executing those patterns because of the speed? It's hard to sync two hands that fast for many people, because that skill is mental, so if the map were 180bpm, would you call it easy then? (Not saying I can play it though)
Also my point was on the adjacent repetitive nature of patterns because of group reading, like in the start. Sure the "ddk" pattern appears a lot, but the sections where it is divided between 1/2 notes makes it harder doesn't it, because the repetition is broken? Or are you saying it's the other way around?
IMO I treat the idea of reading and execution as one and the same. If you can't do it consistently, you still have trouble reading it. "Mechanical" may just be the word I was looking for. In osu!std I have this problem, and there's only notes and sliders there... much easier by comparison, but there are still problems because of "mechanical" issues with odd/even numbers of notes.
It was also a clarification that did not embody the message I wanted you to read.
Not counting speed limits. Also note that this only has to do with complexity score, nothing else. If you know osu!tp, you'll know std has aim/speed/acc. In Taiko, for example, it would be complexity/speed/acc. If you fill the whole map with ddk, the complexity may be lower, but the speed score will be higher because of density.
I'd like your explanation though, because throwing examples around just clutters the thread. Or at least shoot a hole in my logic that I can see, and let's be done with it.
i think just because the single notes are easier to watch timing on
or 5 note pattern repeating instead of 3
The thing is, seeing is one thing, hitting what you see is another. Mechanics used to hit certain things, handswitches especially are really complicated to execute. It looks simple, but it's a really pain in the ass thing to do. People who fully alternate for a long time and are really good at it (like EBAWER) don't feel this mechanic problem as much because it's just natural thing to do, but there are not many people on that level.
Let me put it this way, it's not hard after an insane amount of practice, however that just says how hard it actually is, by seeing how much practice you need with it.
Even on low bpm maps, when I see something like [dddkkkd] at 1/6 inside or at the end of a stream, or even isolated, I still can't hit it. It's really complicated to adjust your rhythm and to perform a handswitch at the same time, at my level. Will take a lot of practice for me to perform it well.
Cheesing patterns required a certain way to play them, and streams are just ongoing notes, you can't really "think" on which pattern you have to play while actually playing it, you need some buffer time (I did at least). With training you can get around it I guess, but because of my 2nd problem (chaining simple patterns in a stream) I chose to swap, because the way I learned to play kdd really destroyed my ability to chain kdddkdddkdddk, making my hands entangle and spend insane amounts of strength just to do it badly. You can see it in some of my vids I posted how I cheese the patterns. :p
Now with full alternate, I just hit them naturally and when I see an even amount of dons, I know the next kat is a hand switch.
While I can still use my old style to play some maps really nicely, I choose not to because full alt is infinitely more fun to me.
not functional, play for fun!
I agree with XK2238 about FL stuff. It is possible to train your reflexes to play FL, i got better and better playing with it, BUT it is only readable at low bpm taiko maps and low SV/BPM converted ones. Also depends on the ammount of notes in the map, since the visibility area gets smaller when you reach 100 and 200 combo. Otherwise FLit is useless on taiko maps and imo should not count on them, cause memorization is not a competitive type of skill.. ANY player can memorize a map, it just depends on the ammount of attempts each one takes to do it. But there are players who can memorize easier than others and can't play hard patterns with good accuraccy or can't read high BPM on taiko maps.
2.
This game is a rythim game ( meaning of course that you need to play in the right rythim), so accuracy should count way more than other mods, meaning that DT and HR should be more rewarded since it raises OD.Takes skill to play HD too, meaning you can follow the rythim, but anyway HR>HD. By the way, HR&HD IS playable.
3.
I think converted maps SHOULD count as well, because there are songs you like, and there's not a taiko mode on it. But the converted ones shouldn't be weighted as much as taiko maps, UNLESS Tom94 comes up with a nice system.
In fact, by making the scrolling speed (or SV in osu terms) faster, it affects your accuracy, usually it makes you play more accurately rather than when you play with low scrolling speed. It might be a bad comparison, but have you ever noticed how usually beatmania IIDX players play with high Hi-Speed (scrolling speed) and a lot of people use curtains as well? It's because reaction time kicks in when you play with faster scrolling and less notes on-screen, often making you more accurate. So HR should stay the same as HD as the difficulty is very equal.
You can still try and hit the notes by looking at when the notes hit the circle with HR (bad playing choice). With HD you can't as the notes vanish, so you'd need equally as much rhythmic accuracy with both mods, in my opinion.
Or even better, if you find a pending taiko set for said song, help it get ranked by modding it!
show more
dou888
I think the main factors of determining stream difficulties are:
length+
speed+
color changes+
rhythm changes+ (1/6mixed in 1/4s etc)
big notes+
repetition-
Using linear prediction filters(-2 -1, 0, 1, 2 for big blue, blue, none, red, big red respectively) in 1/12 rhythm intervals applied over overlapping 1/2/4 bars of map then record the error as entropy and include it in the estimation for difficulty may be worth a try (similar to Linear predictive coding).
^^really I have no idea what I'm talking about, just thought it may be fun to do.
length+
speed+
color changes+
rhythm changes+ (1/6mixed in 1/4s etc)
big notes+
repetition-
Using linear prediction filters(-2 -1, 0, 1, 2 for big blue, blue, none, red, big red respectively) in 1/12 rhythm intervals applied over overlapping 1/2/4 bars of map then record the error as entropy and include it in the estimation for difficulty may be worth a try (similar to Linear predictive coding).
^^really I have no idea what I'm talking about, just thought it may be fun to do.
My take on Taiko (was around 1900 before removal)
Similar to mania, I believe that mode-specific maps should be weighed a lot more than auto-converts. Auto-converts change the map into a rhythm map, with extremely awkward timings, abrupt tempo changes, and unrealistic big notes in the middle of a stream. And again, much like mania, auto-converts don't have certain patterns which you see when you get into maps that get more difficult, for example the long streams in Shinsekai (http://osu.ppy.sh/s/24634), MEPHISTO, or variations in streams like duckling (http://osu.ppy.sh/s/28893) or Intersect Thunderbolt (http://osu.ppy.sh/s/38316).
Accuracy could and should be used as a good determinant in skill, as there is no further differentiation between 良 and 可.
Will edit with time.
Similar to mania, I believe that mode-specific maps should be weighed a lot more than auto-converts. Auto-converts change the map into a rhythm map, with extremely awkward timings, abrupt tempo changes, and unrealistic big notes in the middle of a stream. And again, much like mania, auto-converts don't have certain patterns which you see when you get into maps that get more difficult, for example the long streams in Shinsekai (http://osu.ppy.sh/s/24634), MEPHISTO, or variations in streams like duckling (http://osu.ppy.sh/s/28893) or Intersect Thunderbolt (http://osu.ppy.sh/s/38316).
Accuracy could and should be used as a good determinant in skill, as there is no further differentiation between 良 and 可.
Will edit with time.
Standard maps aren't made in the mindset to be challenging, worthwhile, or played in taiko, except for the handful of taikosu! maps. They are made to be played in Standard. Not to mention most standard conversions are considered unrankable because of SV and finisher usage. So they don't even fit with the criteria a taiko map should have. Essentially, they are a completely different style of play from what the community considers taiko gameplay. (as shown from the long discussion of making the taiko ranking criteria.)
So, there is no reason they should be included in the taiko ranking system.
Anyways on terms of mod scaling, DT is obviously the hardest mod. Not just because of speed, but because it adds more OD to the map as well. In my opinion HR and HD are equal. HR provides slight vision impairment from higher speeds, and a big boost in the OD. While HD provides a substantially greater vision impairment that can severely effect your accuracy, even though there is no OD boost. This is based off a theoretical player who hasn't played either mod enough to get used to the differences these mods make. We all know after a while these mods become second hand.
I can't really say anything about FL because there hasn't been a breakthrough in how to play it efficiently without having a good memory or playing the song a million times to memorize it. Something that doesn't equate to raw skill in my mind.
As far as note density goes: I would like to think a ratio of notes to song length would be accurate, but every song is different and just isn't possible without over/undermapping. So basing it off something like BPM would be more accurate, in theory.
So, there is no reason they should be included in the taiko ranking system.
Anyways on terms of mod scaling, DT is obviously the hardest mod. Not just because of speed, but because it adds more OD to the map as well. In my opinion HR and HD are equal. HR provides slight vision impairment from higher speeds, and a big boost in the OD. While HD provides a substantially greater vision impairment that can severely effect your accuracy, even though there is no OD boost. This is based off a theoretical player who hasn't played either mod enough to get used to the differences these mods make. We all know after a while these mods become second hand.
I can't really say anything about FL because there hasn't been a breakthrough in how to play it efficiently without having a good memory or playing the song a million times to memorize it. Something that doesn't equate to raw skill in my mind.
As far as note density goes: I would like to think a ratio of notes to song length would be accurate, but every song is different and just isn't possible without over/undermapping. So basing it off something like BPM would be more accurate, in theory.
Factors affect the overall difficulty of a taiko map
1. OD, higher the harder you can hit
2. HP, I don't know but I think this should be included. Since you need to get a pass to submit your score....but it does not affect too much
3. Stream, or just call this the note patten.
4. BPM, yes even if you have very simple note but in high bpm they should be difficult
Example : http://osu.ppy.sh/b/179225 280 BPM but notes patten is not that difficult
5. Timing points, or the bpm change or the SV multiplier. Can affect a lot if you fill the map with green line like grass...
Example : http://osu.ppy.sh/u/242910 Trust me the link is correct.
6. Mods, I think so many big guys have explained a lot on how mods affect the map so I am not going to explain
How to deal with all these factors?
1. OD, the number can be treated as a multiplier
2. HP , same
3. Stream, now this is the important point. Stream is the core part on how we rate a taiko map. We have to discuss a lot on which patten is more difficult than another patten. But I want to say taiko stream have unlimited combination, even if you say ddkkddk is more difficult than ddddkkd it still does not have meaning to ddddkkkkd. How if a map with endless stream like Shinsekai? So how to deal with this problem? I think the key is how player read the map. In Chinese there is a term that we " Crack the map ". Which we divide a long stream into small part and play them one by one. For example I divide a long stream by 2/3/4 method. Which I try to search for 2/3/4 patten in a long stream and crack it down. I don't know how others do but that's how I do. If we can come to a conclusion on how to crack the map, there is a easy way to crack down any stream and rate it. For example we all agree that we use 3/3/3/3/3 to crack down the map, we can just divide the long stream into 3/3/3/3/3 and rate each of the 3 and add them up. In the last few 3 I think we should also raise the difficulty a bit since it is a long stream. After all, if we need to talk about stream difficulty, we have to look from a player's eyes but not a mapper.
4. BPM affect a lot, but here is what I suggest. BPM 160 - 200, no change, from that 2 number go down and up, we add the difficulty index bit by bit. For example, BPM 160 = 1.0 , and BPM 150 will = 1.05 which is the same as BPM 210. Why? Because WHAT I THINK 160 -200 is usually a comfortable zone for player.
5. Timing points, am I don't really know how to deal with those grass, can someone think of a suggestion?
6. Mods, I think we have to find some expert in each mods to ask for opinion. What I know is Orukaa CROSS PM and ZX = DT Ishida = HR asgardv = PF Nardo = FL. I think every single mod should be included, HR DT HD FL, even the perfect mod but not sudden death which gives no meaning at all. Why perfect? Because of the super high pressure , just try once you will know.
Last, I am busy in last few weeks and I think I can come back on my rater program now. Thanks for waiting. However I need help the point 3, the stream patten.
I think the best method on how to rate ALL the stream by a program is we hard code a difficulty index to 2/3/4 patten and we "crack the damn map" with program. I am creating a google form for this please wait.....
1. OD, higher the harder you can hit
2. HP, I don't know but I think this should be included. Since you need to get a pass to submit your score....but it does not affect too much
3. Stream, or just call this the note patten.
4. BPM, yes even if you have very simple note but in high bpm they should be difficult
Example : http://osu.ppy.sh/b/179225 280 BPM but notes patten is not that difficult
5. Timing points, or the bpm change or the SV multiplier. Can affect a lot if you fill the map with green line like grass...
Example : http://osu.ppy.sh/u/242910 Trust me the link is correct.
6. Mods, I think so many big guys have explained a lot on how mods affect the map so I am not going to explain
How to deal with all these factors?
1. OD, the number can be treated as a multiplier
2. HP , same
3. Stream, now this is the important point. Stream is the core part on how we rate a taiko map. We have to discuss a lot on which patten is more difficult than another patten. But I want to say taiko stream have unlimited combination, even if you say ddkkddk is more difficult than ddddkkd it still does not have meaning to ddddkkkkd. How if a map with endless stream like Shinsekai? So how to deal with this problem? I think the key is how player read the map. In Chinese there is a term that we " Crack the map ". Which we divide a long stream into small part and play them one by one. For example I divide a long stream by 2/3/4 method. Which I try to search for 2/3/4 patten in a long stream and crack it down. I don't know how others do but that's how I do. If we can come to a conclusion on how to crack the map, there is a easy way to crack down any stream and rate it. For example we all agree that we use 3/3/3/3/3 to crack down the map, we can just divide the long stream into 3/3/3/3/3 and rate each of the 3 and add them up. In the last few 3 I think we should also raise the difficulty a bit since it is a long stream. After all, if we need to talk about stream difficulty, we have to look from a player's eyes but not a mapper.
4. BPM affect a lot, but here is what I suggest. BPM 160 - 200, no change, from that 2 number go down and up, we add the difficulty index bit by bit. For example, BPM 160 = 1.0 , and BPM 150 will = 1.05 which is the same as BPM 210. Why? Because WHAT I THINK 160 -200 is usually a comfortable zone for player.
5. Timing points, am I don't really know how to deal with those grass, can someone think of a suggestion?
6. Mods, I think we have to find some expert in each mods to ask for opinion. What I know is Orukaa CROSS PM and ZX = DT Ishida = HR asgardv = PF Nardo = FL. I think every single mod should be included, HR DT HD FL, even the perfect mod but not sudden death which gives no meaning at all. Why perfect? Because of the super high pressure , just try once you will know.
Last, I am busy in last few weeks and I think I can come back on my rater program now. Thanks for waiting. However I need help the point 3, the stream patten.
I think the best method on how to rate ALL the stream by a program is we hard code a difficulty index to 2/3/4 patten and we "crack the damn map" with program. I am creating a google form for this please wait.....
mekadon_old
They are still readable (4:3) just like how 16:9 is. At least for me though. HRHD is much easier to manage than pure memorization just like HDFL, but you shouldn't say FL should be nerfed, since the hugest enemy FL players usually face is accuracy than the patterns itself, (also remember there's no OD change at all, and to be honest I am always amazed at people who can HRHDFL a map with over 97% accuracy) I still find HD easier than HR, maybe it's because I'm more used to HD. I have something on DT, where as long as the BPM is over <inserts BPM here, 140 for me>, extra pp should be given. I can't stand slow maps, anything below 140BPM, and I'd rather use DT with them, even with a lesser accuracy. And as for my standpoint,Nashmun wrote:
I do not agree with your comment on HDHR @Gezo, it's only readable if you play with a widescreen resolution.
DT < HR = HD < FLAs for coverted taiko vs. taiko only maps, I'd say give converted maps way lesser weights than taiko only maps. As skills increase, you can purely hit for taiko-only maps for pp instead of ranking on converted maps, as they are way easier to get ranks with. You can even get to the Top 50 even with a C rank.
As for giving weights based on patterns, how to we judge the pattern is hard or not? Different people have different playstyles, and different people have different opinions on patterns. Like me I still think dkkdkkd and kdkkdkkd is hard but dddkkkddd and kkkdddkkk is easier...
Also no matter how long the patterns are, the complexity of it still comes down by splitting them into simpler patterns.. For example, splitting a pattern like kkdddkdddkdkkkdkkkddkkd can also be split like kk dddk dddk dkkk dkkk ddkkd, which makes managing patterns easier
seasonS
I like what Tom94 says here.Tom94 wrote:
Converted vs. Taiko-specific
I plan to weight converted maps just as much as Taiko-specific maps and present you all with a list of beatmaps together with their respective difficulty. If it ends up working well I don't see a reason to exclude converted maps. If it won't work they won't be included (or by a small margin).
Everyone else is saying "no no no make taiko specific worth much more" But, in my opinion, converts should be worth ALMOST as much as taiko specific since some can be difficult. Not all converts are great but, they shouldn't be worth too little.
I just wanted to confirm lolcubes' statement that patterns with alternating groups of even and odd numbers of notes are generally hard to play (For patterns longer than 3 notes at least). That's the most specific start for an actual algorithm you could probably use. Add in something about repetition and it should already work pretty well.
Another thing to keep in mind is that repetition on blue ticks is usually harder; for example ddkkddkkd is super simple, while dkkddkk is a lot trickier to play (still somewhat basic, but definitely way harder)
Another thing to keep in mind is that repetition on blue ticks is usually harder; for example ddkkddkkd is super simple, while dkkddkk is a lot trickier to play (still somewhat basic, but definitely way harder)
I am not really sure how you want to measure difficulty of a pattern because it's silly, there are a few basic patterns to learn but not so much:
[1] d, k
[2] dd, kk, dk, kd
[3] ddd, kkk, ddk, kkd, dkd, kdk, dkk, kdd
[4] dddd, kkkk, dddk, kkkd, ddkd, kkdk, dkdd, kdkk, dkkk, kddd, dkdk, kdkd, ddkk, kkdd, dkkd, kddk
[5] all from [4] + d/k in the end
Only 62 patterns =) mania has 30 times more to say the least, not including combination of those patterns which play a much bigger role there than in taiko.
After learning to read all those patterns there is nothing more to learn about them because all streams can be divided into clusters of 1/2/3/4/5 notes, ie:
dddkkkddkkdkdkkkkdddkkdddkkkkkdkdkdkdddkdkdkkkdkdk = ddd kkk ddkk dkd kkkk ddd kk ddd kkkkk dkdkdk ddd kdkd kkk dkdk dd D
This is basic reading skill, we divide a stream into groups of usually 2/3/4, sometimes 5 or 1 if we have a finisher or a certain amount of same colour notes or we just prefer to have in mind clusters of 5 instead of 3+2/1+4/2+2+1/etc and that's all, after learning how to play each pattern, streams without BPM changes become easy to read.
Only thing that most of people hate about streams, especially on 240+ bpm streams where it takes a little bit more skill to read the stream due to the sheer speed, is even amount of notes mixed with odd amount of notes, ie:
ddddkkkddkkkddddkkkddkkddddkkkddddddkkdddkkkkddd = dddd kkk dd kkk dddd kkk dd kk dddd kkk ddd ddd kk ddd kkkk ddd (Mixed hand change)
This stream is annoying due to changing hands but again, awarding this stream more pp than these 2 is kinda biased imho:
ddddkkkkddddkkkkddkkddkkddddkkkkddkkddkkddkkddkk = dddd kkkk dddd kkkk dd kk dd kk dddd kkkk dd kk dd kk dd kk dd kk (No hand change)
dddkkkdddkkkdddkkkdddkkkdddkkkddkddkddkdddkkkddd = ddd kkk ddd kkk ddd kkk ddd kkk ddd kkk ddk ddk ddk ddd kkk ddd (All patterns w/ hand change)
Another thing that people find hard are not streams but certain patterns at high speed:
dk kk kd dk dk dk kk kd kd dk dk dd kd dk dk kd kd dk
Even though it is difficult to some people but again there are people who don't see any difficulty with this, so I don't really see the point of getting more pp when it comes to this pattern.
Another pattern-based thing is a stream with bpm changes, like this:
1/4 stream with 1/8 clusters inside but this again can be easilly calculated in your algorithm as a stream of a certain BPM which lasts for example in this map it was from 00:32:241 (302) - 00:35:321 (358) , 224 BPM base, 57 notes, of which N amount was 1/4 and M was 1/8
I am not sure which and how you will calculate this but this stream has a difficulty based on speed not really a problem with patterns. All in all I don't really see any point in giving certain patterns more "weight" than others, just calculate a length of a certain part of the song, see if it has bpm changes or not and that's all. I think it will be more fair and unbiased, because we can argue about pattern difficulty forever but it's just our opinions whether a BPM increase is always hard.
[1] d, k
[2] dd, kk, dk, kd
[3] ddd, kkk, ddk, kkd, dkd, kdk, dkk, kdd
[4] dddd, kkkk, dddk, kkkd, ddkd, kkdk, dkdd, kdkk, dkkk, kddd, dkdk, kdkd, ddkk, kkdd, dkkd, kddk
[5] all from [4] + d/k in the end
Only 62 patterns =) mania has 30 times more to say the least, not including combination of those patterns which play a much bigger role there than in taiko.
After learning to read all those patterns there is nothing more to learn about them because all streams can be divided into clusters of 1/2/3/4/5 notes, ie:
dddkkkddkkdkdkkkkdddkkdddkkkkkdkdkdkdddkdkdkkkdkdk = ddd kkk ddkk dkd kkkk ddd kk ddd kkkkk dkdkdk ddd kdkd kkk dkdk dd D
This is basic reading skill, we divide a stream into groups of usually 2/3/4, sometimes 5 or 1 if we have a finisher or a certain amount of same colour notes or we just prefer to have in mind clusters of 5 instead of 3+2/1+4/2+2+1/etc and that's all, after learning how to play each pattern, streams without BPM changes become easy to read.
Only thing that most of people hate about streams, especially on 240+ bpm streams where it takes a little bit more skill to read the stream due to the sheer speed, is even amount of notes mixed with odd amount of notes, ie:
ddddkkkddkkkddddkkkddkkddddkkkddddddkkdddkkkkddd = dddd kkk dd kkk dddd kkk dd kk dddd kkk ddd ddd kk ddd kkkk ddd (Mixed hand change)
This stream is annoying due to changing hands but again, awarding this stream more pp than these 2 is kinda biased imho:
ddddkkkkddddkkkkddkkddkkddddkkkkddkkddkkddkkddkk = dddd kkkk dddd kkkk dd kk dd kk dddd kkkk dd kk dd kk dd kk dd kk (No hand change)
dddkkkdddkkkdddkkkdddkkkdddkkkddkddkddkdddkkkddd = ddd kkk ddd kkk ddd kkk ddd kkk ddd kkk ddk ddk ddk ddd kkk ddd (All patterns w/ hand change)
Another thing that people find hard are not streams but certain patterns at high speed:
dk kk kd dk dk dk kk kd kd dk dk dd kd dk dk kd kd dk
Even though it is difficult to some people but again there are people who don't see any difficulty with this, so I don't really see the point of getting more pp when it comes to this pattern.
Another pattern-based thing is a stream with bpm changes, like this:
1/4 stream with 1/8 clusters inside but this again can be easilly calculated in your algorithm as a stream of a certain BPM which lasts for example in this map it was from 00:32:241 (302) - 00:35:321 (358) , 224 BPM base, 57 notes, of which N amount was 1/4 and M was 1/8
I am not sure which and how you will calculate this but this stream has a difficulty based on speed not really a problem with patterns. All in all I don't really see any point in giving certain patterns more "weight" than others, just calculate a length of a certain part of the song, see if it has bpm changes or not and that's all. I think it will be more fair and unbiased, because we can argue about pattern difficulty forever but it's just our opinions whether a BPM increase is always hard.
Addressing the post above:
If you split it this way, you need to keep in mind that hand switches occurr. Assuming you start the stream on your right hand, that equates to:
dddkkkddkkdkdkkkkdddkkdddkkkkkdkdkdkdddkdkdkkkdkdk = right-hand-ddd left-hand-kkk right-hand-ddkk right-hand-dkd left-hand-kkkk left-hand-ddd right-hand-kk right-hand-ddd left-hand-kkkkk right-hand-dkdkdk right-hand-ddd left-hand-kdkd left-hand-kkk right-hand-dkdk
That's a LOT more complicated than you make it sound.
/E: Fixed the right/left assignments. I messed up on a stream with unlimited time to think about it, just goes to show how easy it is to get confused on these patterns...
dddkkkddkkdkdkkkkdddkkdddkkkkkdkdkdkdddkdkdkkkdkdk = ddd kkk ddkk dkd kkkk ddd kk ddd kkkkk dkdkdk ddd kdkd kkk dkdkYou can't just say that streams are nothing more than a combination of these patterns and only marginally harder than the added value of all of them.
If you split it this way, you need to keep in mind that hand switches occurr. Assuming you start the stream on your right hand, that equates to:
dddkkkddkkdkdkkkkdddkkdddkkkkkdkdkdkdddkdkdkkkdkdk = right-hand-ddd left-hand-kkk right-hand-ddkk right-hand-dkd left-hand-kkkk left-hand-ddd right-hand-kk right-hand-ddd left-hand-kkkkk right-hand-dkdkdk right-hand-ddd left-hand-kdkd left-hand-kkk right-hand-dkdk
That's a LOT more complicated than you make it sound.
/E: Fixed the right/left assignments. I messed up on a stream with unlimited time to think about it, just goes to show how easy it is to get confused on these patterns...
To be honest it looks like a color blind test
anyway actually different people may divide stream in different way, hard to say who is right
anyway actually different people may divide stream in different way, hard to say who is right
I play full alternate and I encourage all other players to learn full alt so you won't get any problems with hand switching. While patterns are a difficulty based on a person playing and his style, it is still not that much of a factor compared to SV(Speed of your eyes), OD(Precision of your tapping), BPM(Speed of your hands), Length of a pattern(Your stamina), Length of a song(Your stamina) and mods which increase or decrease the difficulty.Luna wrote:
Addressing the post above:dddkkkddkkdkdkkkkdddkkdddkkkkkdkdkdkdddkdkdkkkdkdk = ddd kkk ddkk dkd kkkk ddd kk ddd kkkkk dkdkdk ddd kdkd kkk dkdkYou can't just say that streams are nothing more than a combination of these patterns and only marginally harder than the added value of all of them.
If you split it this way, you need to keep in mind that hand switches occurr. Assuming you start the stream on your right hand, that equates to:
That's a LOT more complicated than you make it sound.
Something I want to say:
① OD of course higher OD means higher pp
②mod I think DT>HR=HD>FL of course. Or you can just let FL≈0.(HR+HD) should not be more than( HR)+(HD).So is HDFL and HRFL and HDHRFL
③of course Taiko only maps far more than converted maps.From pp now I think 3 times is not enough.Maybe it should be 5 timers or more.
④The difficulty of the map itself. I think this is the most important.There are many points.
(1)BPM this BPM is the REAL BPM but not what the mapper give us. For example, the big black should be calculated as 180BPM but not 360.
(2)Change of the colors. I only have a theory of calculate the difficulty of a stream.I'm trying to translate it to English.
(3)Rhythm change. 1/6+1/4 is harder than 1/4 only of course.
(4)Note density. I think this one needn't be explained.
(5)Star rate. That's really means nothing in Taiko. So many wrong examples.
if you have any questions about what I say u can ask here or just PM me.
① OD of course higher OD means higher pp
②mod I think DT>HR=HD>FL of course. Or you can just let FL≈0.(HR+HD) should not be more than( HR)+(HD).So is HDFL and HRFL and HDHRFL
③of course Taiko only maps far more than converted maps.From pp now I think 3 times is not enough.Maybe it should be 5 timers or more.
④The difficulty of the map itself. I think this is the most important.There are many points.
(1)BPM this BPM is the REAL BPM but not what the mapper give us. For example, the big black should be calculated as 180BPM but not 360.
(2)Change of the colors. I only have a theory of calculate the difficulty of a stream.I'm trying to translate it to English.
(3)Rhythm change. 1/6+1/4 is harder than 1/4 only of course.
(4)Note density. I think this one needn't be explained.
(5)Star rate. That's really means nothing in Taiko. So many wrong examples.
if you have any questions about what I say u can ask here or just PM me.
Currently the client says i have "5825pp" and im "#3658", those numbers have the new pp or is just showing the old system?
Hm. I have to agree with EBAWER123 post. I never thought in this way. That's interesting.
Luna, he is right I think. For example: ddd kkk d is nothing else than dddkkkd. You play it in the same way. Just with the difference, having a gap between a pattern.
Example:
ddkkdkddkd ≈ dd kk dkd dkd
kdkkdkkdk ≈ kdk kdk kdk
ddkkddkdk ≈ ddk kdd kdk
When alternaiting, you play it in the same way. One pattern just has a gap or not, that's the difference. And I think he is right with his opinion, that there shouldn't be a value for certain patterns. That was one of our biggest problems before, but in the way he mentioned it, this problem would be solved. Especially because the BPM would define what is harder or not(E.g.: BPM 240 ddddkkkkd > BPM 150 dk kd dk kd d (?)).
@WemadeFOX-solo: See it as proto-typ. It will change later for sure.
Luna, he is right I think. For example: ddd kkk d is nothing else than dddkkkd. You play it in the same way. Just with the difference, having a gap between a pattern.
Example:
ddkkdkddkd ≈ dd kk dkd dkd
kdkkdkkdk ≈ kdk kdk kdk
ddkkddkdk ≈ ddk kdd kdk
When alternaiting, you play it in the same way. One pattern just has a gap or not, that's the difference. And I think he is right with his opinion, that there shouldn't be a value for certain patterns. That was one of our biggest problems before, but in the way he mentioned it, this problem would be solved. Especially because the BPM would define what is harder or not(E.g.: BPM 240 ddddkkkkd > BPM 150 dk kd dk kd d (?)).
@WemadeFOX-solo: See it as proto-typ. It will change later for sure.
Yes but no, each player has it own way of dividing them. I differentiate them in a totally different manner than you and EBAWER. But I do agree with both of you that patterns shouldn't be taken in consideration for long stream, because one pattern that seems easy for a players is hard for another and vice versa.OnosakiHito wrote:
Hm. I have to agree with EBAWER123 post. I never thought in this way. That's interesting.
Luna, he is right I think. For example: ddd kkk d is nothing else than dddkkkd. You play it in the same way. Just with the difference, having a gap between a pattern.
Example:
ddkkdkddkd ≈ dd kk dkd dkd
kdkkdkkdk ≈ kdk kdk kdk
ddkkddkdk ≈ ddk kdd kdk
When alternaiting, you play it in the same way. One pattern just has a gap or not, that's the difference. And I think he is right with his opinion, that there shouldn't be a value for certain patterns. That was one of our biggest problems before, but in the way he mentioned it, this problem would be solved. Especially because the BPM would define what is harder or not(E.g.: BPM 240 ddddkkkkd > BPM 150 dk kd dk kd d (?)).
@WemadeFOX-solo: See it as proto-typ. It will change later for sure.
And that take us to another argument against converted maps, because if you don't consider patterns, then maps with ddddd/kkkkk (Most common 1/4 streams in converted) will be rated harder because it will increase density.
Well, in your example (ddd kkk d) the hand movements for most players are rlr rlr r (r= right, l= left)
dddkkkd however is rlrlrlr, so the kkk is played lrl instead.
And even if you play the entire map with full alt, ddd kkk d is WAY easier to a) read, because it has the gaps and b) play, because you don't need to start some patterns (in this case the kkk) on a blue tick.
dddkkkd however is rlrlrlr, so the kkk is played lrl instead.
And even if you play the entire map with full alt, ddd kkk d is WAY easier to a) read, because it has the gaps and b) play, because you don't need to start some patterns (in this case the kkk) on a blue tick.
All difficulties concerning patterns are superstitious, everyone has their own problems when it comes to reading patterns and playing them, but it is not possible for a machine to differentiate them. While cheking cluster length and density of notes is easy and doable.
Though, there are still some problems. We talked about this in #taiko .
For example is a ddddkkkkd stream considered as harder than dkkdkkdkkd since in your table oooo > oxx.
For example is a ddddkkkkd stream considered as harder than dkkdkkdkkd since in your table oooo > oxx.
pp previous.
For example, someone won the #1 first and got some pp.
Secondly, someone else got the same as #1 second and got some pp.
pp that can be acquired, second #1 < first #1.
It isn't the same.
This should not.
For example, someone won the #1 first and got some pp.
Secondly, someone else got the same as #1 second and got some pp.
pp that can be acquired, second #1 < first #1.
It isn't the same.
This should not.
And
I think pp earlier was excellent.
In the basic pp previous,
please fix second(third,fourth,fifth...) #1 < first #1.
It become second(third,fourth,fifth...) #1 = first #1.
And
Please BAN cheater.
ppv2 will become stable ranking.
I think pp earlier was excellent.
In the basic pp previous,
please fix second(third,fourth,fifth...) #1 < first #1.
It become second(third,fourth,fifth...) #1 = first #1.
And
Please BAN cheater.
ppv2 will become stable ranking.
This is the way it SHOULD be. The old way was stupid as hell because if you weren't around when the mapset was ranked, you weren't going to get #1 because you KNOW there's gonna be one player who will 100% DTHD / DT / HR / HD the song. Just because they're the first person to do it doesn't mean they should get more points for it as BOTH tied plays took equal amount of skill to perform.- - - - - wrote:
It become second(third,fourth,fifth...) #1 = first #1.
for mod, this is so hot to the correct answer imo.OnosakiHito wrote:
Mods
Doubletime
The slower the song, the less pp you gain.
The faster the song, the more pp you gain.
Hidden
The slower the song, the more pp you gain because, you have to remember more notes for some periode of time.
The faster the song, the less pp you gain because, you have to remember less notes for some periode of time.
HardRock
The slower the song, the less pp you gain because, density becomes higher and notes are less clustered. Easier readable.
The faster the song, the more pp you gain because, the density becomes really high and hard to read.
Flashlight
Should be disabled or give no points. Too often there was a problem with this mod.
Most people do not play it and it has been often abused (HD+FL+HR). That's my opinion.
Of course, we have to take care of OD and SV here.
supplementary the some my feelings.
FL made the too many player angry. we should not be a memorize the diffs. because Taiko is a rhythm game i think.
well, in some cases need the memorize. e.g. : complex stream pattern, weird rhythm by song....
but this is nothing to do with memorize for FL.
DS is too easy in taiko, FL is not an exaggeration to say mod for DS players.
HD+HR also similar to FL.
this combination is not working nearly the on taiko.
1, wide screen is so advantageous.
2, memorize must be to some extent.
3, same as FL, cause make the DS player.
anyway i fully agree to Oh no sakihito.
i omitted about hitsound patterns because subjectivity is too big.
well, some people actually have fun through FL. It gives players with lesser raw skill (considering legit ones in this case) an opportunity to compete evenly with higher raw skill, non-FL players (although memorization itself is already a skill imo; only some people can actually do it in fewer tries than anyone else/do hardcore, non-repetitive stuffs. Take baka_baka_Koishi, for example. Regardless, it's not really raw, but still). Although I haven't tried it at all, I think it's NOT impossible to actually train your reflexes with FL, but then again it's much more tedious to train than with other mods, thus making people not go through it. Just my opinion.WemadeFOX-solo wrote:
This, flashlight may be an challenge to the player but shouldn't influence in the ladder at all, people are just abusing of it to raise pp.OnosakiHito wrote:
Flashlight
Should be disabled or give no points. Too often there was a problem with this mod.
Most people do not play it and it has been often abused (HD+FL+HR). That's my opinion.
THIS. I didn't train my accuracy, deserving me a lower rank; but trying mod combinations that other people (or, to say the most, anyone) don't/can't (talking about individual song-wise, not overall) clearly helped me raise a lot.EBAWER123 wrote:
The whole ranking is about becoming better, not hiding in the corner and playing only in your comfort zone. Playing higher BPM, increasing your stamina, your reading skills, trying new mods, increasing your accuracy; striving to be better - isn't this the whole point of having a higher rank than someone else?
my agreements are highlighted in red._Gezo_ wrote:
Loctav wrote:
Basically I see it like (vision based mods. HD/HR/FL only affect vision): (HD = HR) < HD+HR < FL < FL+HR < FL+HD < FL+HD+HR
DT is an extra factor, increasing OD and BPM and therefore should be calculated into the difficulty where note density calculations happen.
HR affects OD as well. Else, well you'd see many more HRDT scores on average BPM songs (that is 110-140 bpm range no more)
HRHD is not impossible to read, it's very tough and playable at a very limited range !
FL+HD+anything is "memorization", FL+HR is also memorization (except when BPM gets abusively low) as you have a ridiculous reading timespan.
[/color]
yes, since this thing itself is obviously subjective.LunaticP wrote:
anyway actually different people may divide stream in different way, hard to say who is right
1. But then the game will be basically accuracy-oriented instead of skill-oriented.- Yuuka Niya - wrote:
Something I want to say:
① OD of course higher OD means higher pp
②mod I think DT>HR=HD>FL of course. Or you can just let FL≈0.(HR+HD) should not be more than( HR)+(HD).So is HDFL and HRFL and HDHRFL
③of course Taiko only maps far more than converted maps.From pp now I think 3 times is not enough.Maybe it should be 5 timers or more.
④The difficulty of the map itself. I think this is the most important.There are many points.
(1)BPM this BPM is the REAL BPM but not what the mapper give us. For example, the big black should be calculated as 180BPM but not 360.
(2)Change of the colors. I only have a theory of calculate the difficulty of a stream.I'm trying to translate it to English.
(3)Rhythm change. 1/6+1/4 is harder than 1/4 only of course.
(4)Note density. I think this one needn't be explained.
(5)Star rate. That's really means nothing in Taiko. So many wrong examples.
if you have any questions about what I say u can ask here or just PM me.
2. If you're talking about the score multiplier, no. As I've stated before, FL gives lesser raw-skilled players an opportunity to compete evenly with higher raw-skilled players. If you're talking about the pp, I'm fine with that, but don't nerf it that much though.
As for HDHR, it actually worths more pp, as HR also amplifies the invisibility area of HD (yes, I think that way), making it as it is now. But then again, that's just my opinion.
But you're an extra widescreen player, the area where you can actually see the notes is way higher than others players. Seeing only half a note IS NOT playable at all. As long as HDHR isn't fixed and playable for everyone, there is still a big issue with that mod.
About FLHD, yes we do have some legit players, but it's too easy to DS and the majority of the FLHD scores are DS. Do you prefer to advantage the non-legit plays just to reward the minority of legit plays ?
About FLHD, yes we do have some legit players, but it's too easy to DS and the majority of the FLHD scores are DS. Do you prefer to advantage the non-legit plays just to reward the minority of legit plays ?
HRHD should give a small bonus to accuracy, but none to reading/pattern/whatever that factor may be called. Same for FL. DS is the obvious reason.
Or better yet, get peppy to fix HRHD; I really want to play that mod combination but my 4:3 setup makes it damn near impossible /o/
Or better yet, get peppy to fix HRHD; I really want to play that mod combination but my 4:3 setup makes it damn near impossible /o/
well, I'm actually a 4:3 fullscreen player, but I like playing HR on that reso (and just a friendly reminder: utterly EVERYONE can adjust the reso like I did without having more than ONE monitor). Yeah, the "half a note" thing is really bugging, and people wouldn't even try to adjust their monitor's brightness/contrast/both for that. My (own) suggestion is to increase the visibility by a bit (not large enough to make Taiko scoreboards look like STD's), although we don't know if that will ever be implemented.Nashmun wrote:
But you're an extra widescreen player, the area where you can actually see the notes is way higher than others players. Seeing only half a note IS NOT playable at all. As long as HDHR isn't fixed and playable for everyone, there is still a big issue with that mod.
About FLHD, yes we do have some legit players, but it's too easy to DS and the majority of the FLHD scores are DS. Do you prefer to advantage the non-legit plays just to reward the minority of legit plays ?
2nd line: I'd rather not, but I do have few things in mind:
1. Make osu! so that it can track the total number of plays for each song, even in offline/Autoplay? And more specifically, separate numbers of online, offline, and Auto plays? (mentioned Auto since some players memorize from the Autoplay (this guy, for example))
2. FL-specific: Set some kind of threshold of number of plays (like the above number 1) in each map, so that any number below that threshold can be assured as DS?
^ I do realize that it's nearly impossible, but once it is done right, voila. Of course, a formula must be present in order to achieve this one, although I haven't thought anyhow.
3. Make osu! so that it automatically ends/fails a play if it reaches an amount of X consecutive misses, especially if it's from the first note? Take X = 30 notes, for example. Note that this effectively applies only to Taiko since all the other game modes fail immediately when the HP's empty.
I think that's all I can say for now; got a bit exhausted from homework.
Easy and Normal conversions are pretty damn irrelevant.
That's like saying FL is an easy mod in standard because you can sightread Easy diffs with it.
That's like saying FL is an easy mod in standard because you can sightread Easy diffs with it.
osu!taiko compete for the "memorize skill"!
ahhh im so noob.... yes..
..yeah, this is wrong.
ahhh im so noob.... yes..
..yeah, this is wrong.
can't agree more XDTKSalt wrote:
osu!taiko compete for the "memorize skill"!
ahhh im so noob.... yes..
..yeah, this is wrong.
and I think to calculate the difficulty, note density and OD is enough..what do u think TKS?
Hm. Some of you used the term "unfair" in the last hours due to differences between players and their gameplay.
But if you ask me, the main gameplay is already(or if not, can be) determinated:
Keyboard: kddk
→ As I said before, Taiko is a drum game. And kddk is the authentic gameplay for this game. Not because TNT does so. Rather because the drum is designed in this way - the rim and the centre.
Screen: Widescreen
→ Some of you might disagree with me, but I say that the Widescreen is the main-option here. At this point I might be old-fashioned, but TNT is using this option even with a higher scroll range. In general, HR becomes easier readable and the mod HD+HR is up to a certian extend possible with WS*. Yes, the impact from HD 4:3 to WS is bigger than the one from HR, since the range you have to "memories" in HD becomes bigger while in HR you have more time to see the upcoming notes. But HD-Players can compensate this better than HR player from WS to 4:3.
Additional to this, I want to add what XK2238 said before: Those who can't play HR+HD on 4:3 can change to WS to be able to play it. Reasons like "they are not used to it" or something like that is rather up to the person and shouldn't be taken into account in such discussion.
FL+HD
If some of you really want to keep this mod, a possible solution would be to count HD+FL as HD play. I still say that this mod is too dangerous, but those of you who really like to play it can still do so and be marked as FL+HD player in the ranking. Just with the difference that your HD+FL points = HD points.
That's my opinion again. I see it from a technical way - what is the most beneficial one. Not what a single user wants to see, since this can lead easy to unfair decisions I think.
* Widescreen
But if you ask me, the main gameplay is already(or if not, can be) determinated:
Keyboard: kddk
→ As I said before, Taiko is a drum game. And kddk is the authentic gameplay for this game. Not because TNT does so. Rather because the drum is designed in this way - the rim and the centre.
Screen: Widescreen
→ Some of you might disagree with me, but I say that the Widescreen is the main-option here. At this point I might be old-fashioned, but TNT is using this option even with a higher scroll range. In general, HR becomes easier readable and the mod HD+HR is up to a certian extend possible with WS*. Yes, the impact from HD 4:3 to WS is bigger than the one from HR, since the range you have to "memories" in HD becomes bigger while in HR you have more time to see the upcoming notes. But HD-Players can compensate this better than HR player from WS to 4:3.
Additional to this, I want to add what XK2238 said before: Those who can't play HR+HD on 4:3 can change to WS to be able to play it. Reasons like "they are not used to it" or something like that is rather up to the person and shouldn't be taken into account in such discussion.
FL+HD
If some of you really want to keep this mod, a possible solution would be to count HD+FL as HD play. I still say that this mod is too dangerous, but those of you who really like to play it can still do so and be marked as FL+HD player in the ranking. Just with the difference that your HD+FL points = HD points.
That's my opinion again. I see it from a technical way - what is the most beneficial one. Not what a single user wants to see, since this can lead easy to unfair decisions I think.
* Widescreen
I'm not sure if it's the actual problem, but what about disabling resolution changing in a *.cfg file?
I know, an offtopic.
But let's take a look on osu!mania. Mods give no score multiplier, so simmilar thing should be with performance on Taiko.
[edit](I have no idea if Mods affect performance on osu!mania, sorry)
Like someone already mentioned: DT>HR>HD>FL or DT>HR=HD>FL.
I can't really argue with Hardrock vs Hidden and I have no idea how to explain this.
I just hope you guys will have a one and effective way to handle Convert vs Oni.
I know, an offtopic.
But let's take a look on osu!mania. Mods give no score multiplier, so simmilar thing should be with performance on Taiko.
[edit](I have no idea if Mods affect performance on osu!mania, sorry)
Like someone already mentioned: DT>HR>HD>FL or DT>HR=HD>FL.
I can't really argue with Hardrock vs Hidden and I have no idea how to explain this.
I just hope you guys will have a one and effective way to handle Convert vs Oni.
Can't agree this more.If HD+FL=HD,how about HDHRFL and HDHR? maybe all of them can be same as HR?OnosakiHito wrote:
Hm. Some of you used the term "unfair" in the last hours due to differences between players and their gameplay.
But if you ask me, the main gameplay is already(or if not, can be) determinated:
Keyboard: kddk
→ As I said before, Taiko is a drum game. And kddk is the authentic gameplay for this game. Not because TNT does so. Rather because the drum is designed in this way - the rim and the centre.
Screen: Widescreen
→ Some of you might disagree with me, but I say that the Widescreen is the main-option here. At this point I might be old-fashioned, but TNT is using this option even with a higher scroll range. In general, HR becomes easier readable and the mod HD+HR is up to a certian extend possible with WS*. Yes, the impact from HD 4:3 to WS is bigger than the one from HR, since the range you have to "memories" in HD becomes bigger while in HR you have more time to see the upcoming notes. But HD-Players can compensate this better than HR player from WS to 4:3.
Additional to this, I want to add what XK2238 said before: Those who can't play HR+HD on 4:3 can change to WS to be able to play it. Reasons like "they are not used to it" or something like that is rather up to the person and shouldn't be taken into account in such discussion.
FL+HD
If some of you really want to keep this mod, a possible solution would be to count HD+FL as HD play. I still say that this mod is too dangerous, but those of you who really like to play it can still do so and be marked as FL+HD player in the ranking. Just with the difference that your HD+FL points = HD points.
That's my opinion again. I see it from a technical way - what is the most beneficial one. Not what a single user wants to see, since this can lead easy to unfair decisions I think.
* Widescreen
Ono was referring to the Doron mode for HDFL = HD. HRHD also works as Doron, so does HRHDFL.- Yuuka Niya - wrote:
Can't agree this more.If HD+FL=HD,how about HDHRFL and HDHR? maybe all of them can be same as HR?
I am recently still reading the first page but I really want to put down this.
When it comes to pattern difficulty, it is sometimes subjective to your playing style i.e. full alternative, partial alternative, colour oriented, 4-finger or 2-finger, etc. Therefore it is difficult to tell what is a hard map if we don't decide which playing style we are encouraging first.
Example1: dk kd dk kd dk kd vs dk dk dk dk dk dk, the former is easier for a 4-finger player, while the latter is a much more easier one if you are a 2-finger player as you dont have to move your fingers frequently
Example2: A very high speed with less complicated patterns is easier than a lower speed but more complicated map for full alternative hands player, vice versa for colour oriented hand players. So which is more difficult？
When it comes to pattern difficulty, it is sometimes subjective to your playing style i.e. full alternative, partial alternative, colour oriented, 4-finger or 2-finger, etc. Therefore it is difficult to tell what is a hard map if we don't decide which playing style we are encouraging first.
Example1: dk kd dk kd dk kd vs dk dk dk dk dk dk, the former is easier for a 4-finger player, while the latter is a much more easier one if you are a 2-finger player as you dont have to move your fingers frequently
Example2: A very high speed with less complicated patterns is easier than a lower speed but more complicated map for full alternative hands player, vice versa for colour oriented hand players. So which is more difficult？
If you are meaning the "authentic" thing, I would like to clarify that all of the stated playing styles by me are capable with your model, they are all possible play styles with the orientation kddkOnosakiHito wrote:
^ http://osu.ppy.sh/forum/p/2834015
While this is true, it's a moot point since the default (and should I say main?) input type for a computer is a keyboard (and a mouse), and not a drum. While our taiko is based off TnT, it's not TnT.OnosakiHito wrote:
→ As I said before, Taiko is a drum game. And kddk is the authentic gameplay for this game. Not because TNT does so. Rather because the drum is designed in this way - the rim and the centre.
For the purpose of discussion, we could say that we should be focusing on the default key setup to play with, and that is zxcv in a kddk setup though. That's a more valid argument in my opinion.
osu!standard has nothing in the difficulty formula in the patterns being played by different playstyles (mouse only, tablet + kb, lmb/x, etc), so I'd suggest to keep our taiko that way as well, meaning, it matters little if a pattern is easier or harder on a certain key setup.
Or that.
I'm not really that experienced in taiko, so I'll just speak from my perspective, instead of trying to lay down some hard facts.
I read that you guys think HD<HR, but I think the better you get, the easier HD will become, because you sort of memorise the patterns with muscle memory, so you don't need to "think" about it (or at least that's what I noticed). I only recently started playing HD, but I still find HR easier than HD on a map like this https://osu.ppy.sh/s/45672 , even though I play on 1366x768.
Also I'm a ddkk player, though after seeing what kddk players consider hard, I found that it's similar to what I find hard. Like I think ddkkddkk-- patterns are a breeze, while triplets (especially kat triplets) in a stream is really hard or annoying.
I read that you guys think HD<HR, but I think the better you get, the easier HD will become, because you sort of memorise the patterns with muscle memory, so you don't need to "think" about it (or at least that's what I noticed). I only recently started playing HD, but I still find HR easier than HD on a map like this https://osu.ppy.sh/s/45672 , even though I play on 1366x768.
Also I'm a ddkk player, though after seeing what kddk players consider hard, I found that it's similar to what I find hard. Like I think ddkkddkk-- patterns are a breeze, while triplets (especially kat triplets) in a stream is really hard or annoying.
oh..though I'm kddk ,there are really many ddkk players. So some discussion above means nothing I think.lolcubes wrote:
While this is true, it's a moot point since the default (and should I say main?) input type for a computer is a keyboard (and a mouse), and not a drum. While our taiko is based off TnT, it's not TnT.OnosakiHito wrote:
→ As I said before, Taiko is a drum game. And kddk is the authentic gameplay for this game. Not because TNT does so. Rather because the drum is designed in this way - the rim and the centre.
For the purpose of discussion, we could say that we should be focusing on the default key setup to play with, and that is zxcv in a kddk setup though. That's a more valid argument in my opinion.
osu!standard has nothing in the difficulty formula in the patterns being played by different playstyles (mouse only, tablet + kb, lmb/x, etc), so I'd suggest to keep our taiko that way as well, meaning, it matters little if a pattern is easier or harder on a certain key setup.
And to Ono: if HDHR and HDFL really become Doron mode, it will be a great help to taiko world of course.
Does a certain playstyle confer advantages to playing the game? This is the question we're asking.
I said before that we could do a calibration type measurement before measuring any sort of pp, but I realize now that won't work for this reason. How can we compare the metric between two different playstyles?
We should purely focus on the technical aspects of the game, not the mechanical.
I said before that we could do a calibration type measurement before measuring any sort of pp, but I realize now that won't work for this reason. How can we compare the metric between two different playstyles?
We should purely focus on the technical aspects of the game, not the mechanical.
Naah, the key setups of the playstyles that I've stated are the same, manOnosakiHito wrote:
Or that.
Or at least make FL give 1.06x only (meaning FL + HD/HR = DT, FL + HDHR/DT = HDT/DTHR)... Please, people won't even bother trying to HDFL if it's only going to be exactly the same as HD >.> same applies with +HR.
Think of it as a middle road.
Think of it as a middle road.
i agree that HD+HR is impossible to read, every note looks like 3~4 note cluster.
- Most people said so far HD=HR, so it's cool._verto_ wrote:
SPOILERI'm not really that experienced in taiko, so I'll just speak from my perspective, instead of trying to lay down some hard facts.
I read that you guys think HD<HR, but I think the better you get, the easier HD will become, because you sort of memorise the patterns with muscle memory, so you don't need to "think" about it (or at least that's what I noticed). I only recently started playing HD, but I still find HR easier than HD on a map like this https://osu.ppy.sh/s/45672 , even though I play on 1366x768.
Also I'm a ddkk player, though after seeing what kddk players consider hard, I found that it's similar to what I find hard. Like I think ddkkddkk-- patterns are a breeze, while triplets (especially kat triplets) in a stream is really hard or annoying.
- Both play styles have similarity, but kddk should be considered due to previous said reasons.
Without the mechanical way it is hard to consider what is hard/easy. How else do you want to estimate patterns? By looking at them?Quiesce wrote:
We should purely focus on the technical aspects of the game, not the mechanical.
Well, then we do not need the mod if people think in this way. Sounds hard, but I see no point in supporting a "dangerous mod" because people want to gain just points and ranks with it.XK2238 wrote:
SPOILEROr at least make FL give 1.06x only (meaning FL + HD/HR = DT, FL + HDHR/DT = HDT/DTHR)... Please, people won't even bother trying to HDFL if it's only going to be exactly the same as HD >.> same applies with +HR.
Think of it as a middle road.
We talked about this before. It is possible up to a certain extend. Please read the previous pages.darkmiz wrote:
i agree that HD+HR is impossible to read, every note looks like 3~4 note cluster.
I'm sorry but I can't agree with u.XK2238 wrote:
Or at least make FL give 1.06x only (meaning FL + HD/HR = DT, FL + HDHR/DT = HDT/DTHR)... Please, people won't even bother trying to HDFL if it's only going to be exactly the same as HD >.> same applies with +HR.
Think of it as a middle road.
If FL =1.06x then both in pp and in score HDHRFL is more than DT only , that can't be accepted I think.
You guys should drop FL, honestly whatever happens there's nothing you can do to counter the multiscreen players without penalizing true memory players.
the sad truth has been spoken..._Gezo_ wrote:
You guys should drop FL, honestly whatever happens there's nothing you can do to counter the multiscreen players without penalizing true memory players.
In fact you have to agree that multiscreen players is far more than true memory players when HDFL or HDHRFL._Gezo_ wrote:
You guys should drop FL, honestly whatever happens there's nothing you can do to counter the multiscreen players without penalizing true memory players.
Let's keep the FL topic aside for now.
If you still have anything to say about this topic, read the whole thread again to ensure you do not repeat someone else again, starting from here:
p/2829947
If you still have anything to say about this topic, read the whole thread again to ensure you do not repeat someone else again, starting from here:
p/2829947
Please keep the topic on track. We do not discuss how "stupid FL is" here, too. Please try to contribute to the ppv2 development only.
Thank you
Thank you
I would like to avoid the situation that " I could perform more pp in this map, but those performances are of less score than my best score with lower pp， so I couldnt improve my pp by this map"
In my opinion yes, if you are using the kddk set-up and playing full alt you can play very easily every 1/2 on 300bpm maps and if the map don't have lots of 1/4 it's very simple. But if you singletap everything it'll become way harder/ impossible.Quiesce wrote:
Does a certain playstyle confer advantages to playing the game? This is the question we're asking.
Since this playstyle is the most "optimal" the difficulty should be calculated with the playstyle that makes the game easier imo.
i'd say full alt players usually have lower accuracy but orukaa would strike me downTimmyAkmed wrote:
In my opinion yes, if you are using the kddk set-up and playing full alt you can play very easily every 1/2 on 300bpm maps and if the map don't have lots of 1/4 it's very simple. But if you singletap everything it'll become way harder/ impossible.Quiesce wrote:
Does a certain playstyle confer advantages to playing the game? This is the question we're asking.
Since this playstyle is the most "optimal" the difficulty should be calculated with the playstyle that makes the game easier imo.
i'm late to the party but i think rankings would be boring without converted maps since tvsize hr SSx3000
i've generally been avoiding ranked taiko maps for the last couple months because 95% of them just aren't fun
i could understand converted being worth less pp than taiko due to ranking guidelines and things but you can't ignore the fact that some converted maps take just as much if not more skill* to play
*there is no clear definition of skill, i personally see it as acc + reading/playing patterns (especially high speed)
these 2 maps took hours worth of tries and i consider them to be some of my best scores
https://osu.ppy.sh/p/beatmap?b=272454&m=1
https://osu.ppy.sh/p/beatmap?b=127846&m=1
or take this map, 1 try SS that i wouldn't even blink at if there weren't so few others
https://osu.ppy.sh/b/287463
this should not be worth more than the above maps just because it's specifically for taiko
That's because most of the ranked maps are OD5. Longer maps with OD6 and OD7 aren't really that easy to SS. :p
Oh look my map is up there. But that's actually not that easy to SS with HR ;_;
Oh look my map is up there. But that's actually not that easy to SS with HR ;_;
maybe unpopular opinion but i feel like if SS is possible then OD is too low kevin doesn't count or map is too easy. od5 is always too low, od6 is fine if it's a hard map. od7+ for easier maps
these 2 are things i'd like to see more of for taiko maps
https://osu.ppy.sh/b/284037 hard
https://osu.ppy.sh/b/72460 od8
these 2 are things i'd like to see more of for taiko maps
https://osu.ppy.sh/b/284037 hard
https://osu.ppy.sh/b/72460 od8
There is nothing wrong in map being "too easy", though. I do agree it shouldn't be valued as much obviously.
Let's see how this rating thing comes up. A proper map difficulty algorithm can really help out here.
Let's see how this rating thing comes up. A proper map difficulty algorithm can really help out here.
too easy is bad if it's also boring
doesn't have to be both!
i am super curious about how maps are valued right now and what they'll be like later. SS is way too good right now and i feel like #1 was too good before. if you have a really good score on a map and someone gets a better one, old score is still good even if it's not the best
i'd also like to see global rankings to see how wrong things are right now
-crn- rank 76???????????
doesn't have to be both!
i am super curious about how maps are valued right now and what they'll be like later. SS is way too good right now and i feel like #1 was too good before. if you have a really good score on a map and someone gets a better one, old score is still good even if it's not the best
i'd also like to see global rankings to see how wrong things are right now
-crn- rank 76???????????
Well, currently, the system isn't really good, but that's why this thread is here. :p
I'm #481 which makes no sense, since after I changed my playstyle I can't even FC your generic Onis haha.
I'm #481 which makes no sense, since after I changed my playstyle I can't even FC your generic Onis haha.
i was #2k2, then after doing some insanes/hards on converted maps, i started climbing back to >6k and now >10k, pretty sure this is not working as intended and this is not the finally state of pp
actually it is not working yet, and this is the reason we are talking here
Collapsed because incorrect
So I read the whole thread... and this patterns stuff seems to be going back and forth.
I should probably mention how bad I am first, so take my post as a long-winded opinion. Shoot me down if you must, but I'm interested in taiko nonetheless..
The ranking system needs to rank all players. I'm practically a newbie, despite playing occasionally in the past, only playing muzu's and trying to delve into oni's occasionally, but it's hard. The reason I can't play those oni's is because of the non-repetitive patterns which are very randomised long streams or randomised short patterns with gaps. (Random = non-repetitive) These are just too hard... But when a pattern repeats, no matter where, even in a long stream or with a gap, it is very easy to read and play, even with hand changes. It just needs to repeat only once, and reading is far easier.
Ebawer's example of how you break up reading patterns is correct... I'm noob and already do it. I think other people's examples of longer patterns involving hand changes is subjectively wrong, although their examples are correct. However this is not due to hand-changes, but due to reading complexity, determining when the pattern changes, requiring a hand-switch. You don't read 12 notes at once, you read them in pieces.
Instead of determining which patterns are easier, we should give all patterns a static difficulty based only on their length, up to 5 or 6 notes (including streams)... and rather than rank their difficulty, instead create an algorithm for identifying these patterns (and lengths) and only weight the randomness of the patterns used, i.e. repetition vs non-repetition. You could get more into the specifics of breaking-up the easy ddddkkkk patterns or dkdkdkdkdk, but that's not hard to do.
I think including 62 patterns into some difficulty hierarchy algorithm is going to be far too much work to balance correctly between play styles. The randomness between these patterns is the only thing you can work with. Pattern groups with a random/non-repetitive nature that go on for longer would be worth more "complexity" score. It should also carefully consider odd and even pattern groups though, like having 1 pattern repeated in between a different pattern every time.
This would also solve your auto-convert problem... I think, because they're objectively broken. The hard ones would stay hard, and the easy ones with 1/8 spam would be worth nothing. Ignore rolls and spinners too from calculation... I don't think those have anything to do with skill... just mashing speed.
I'm wearing my bulls-eye T-shirt today.
I should probably mention how bad I am first, so take my post as a long-winded opinion. Shoot me down if you must, but I'm interested in taiko nonetheless..
The ranking system needs to rank all players. I'm practically a newbie, despite playing occasionally in the past, only playing muzu's and trying to delve into oni's occasionally, but it's hard. The reason I can't play those oni's is because of the non-repetitive patterns which are very randomised long streams or randomised short patterns with gaps. (Random = non-repetitive) These are just too hard... But when a pattern repeats, no matter where, even in a long stream or with a gap, it is very easy to read and play, even with hand changes. It just needs to repeat only once, and reading is far easier.
Ebawer's example of how you break up reading patterns is correct... I'm noob and already do it. I think other people's examples of longer patterns involving hand changes is subjectively wrong, although their examples are correct. However this is not due to hand-changes, but due to reading complexity, determining when the pattern changes, requiring a hand-switch. You don't read 12 notes at once, you read them in pieces.
Instead of determining which patterns are easier, we should give all patterns a static difficulty based only on their length, up to 5 or 6 notes (including streams)... and rather than rank their difficulty, instead create an algorithm for identifying these patterns (and lengths) and only weight the randomness of the patterns used, i.e. repetition vs non-repetition. You could get more into the specifics of breaking-up the easy ddddkkkk patterns or dkdkdkdkdk, but that's not hard to do.
I think including 62 patterns into some difficulty hierarchy algorithm is going to be far too much work to balance correctly between play styles. The randomness between these patterns is the only thing you can work with. Pattern groups with a random/non-repetitive nature that go on for longer would be worth more "complexity" score. It should also carefully consider odd and even pattern groups though, like having 1 pattern repeated in between a different pattern every time.
This would also solve your auto-convert problem... I think, because they're objectively broken. The hard ones would stay hard, and the easy ones with 1/8 spam would be worth nothing. Ignore rolls and spinners too from calculation... I don't think those have anything to do with skill... just mashing speed.
I'm wearing my bulls-eye T-shirt today.
SPOILER
RaneFire wrote:
So I read the whole thread... and this patterns stuff seems to be going back and forth.
I should probably mention how bad I am first, so take my post as a long-winded opinion. Shoot me down if you must, but I'm interested in taiko nonetheless..
The ranking system needs to rank all players. I'm practically a newbie, despite playing occasionally in the past, only playing muzu's and trying to delve into oni's occasionally, but it's hard. The reason I can't play those oni's is because of the non-repetitive patterns which are very randomised long streams or randomised short patterns with gaps. (Random = non-repetitive) These are just too hard... But when a pattern repeats, no matter where, even in a long stream or with a gap, it is very easy to read and play, even with hand changes. It just needs to repeat only once, and reading is far easier.
Ebawer's example of how you break up reading patterns is correct... I'm noob and already do it. I think other people's examples of longer patterns involving hand changes is subjectively wrong, although their examples are correct. However this is not due to hand-changes, but due to reading complexity, determining when the pattern changes, requiring a hand-switch. You don't read 12 notes at once, you read them in pieces.
Instead of determining which patterns are easier, we should give all patterns a static difficulty based only on their length, up to 5 or 6 notes (including streams)... and rather than rank their difficulty, instead create an algorithm for identifying these patterns (and lengths) and only weight the randomness of the patterns used, i.e. repetition vs non-repetition. You could get more into the specifics of breaking-up the easy ddddkkkk patterns or dkdkdkdkdk, but that's not hard to do.
I think including 62 patterns into some difficulty hierarchy algorithm is going to be far too much work to balance correctly between play styles. The randomness between these patterns is the only thing you can work with. Pattern groups with a random/non-repetitive nature that go on for longer would be worth more "complexity" score. It should also carefully consider odd and even pattern groups though, like having 1 pattern repeated in between a different pattern every time.
This would also solve your auto-convert problem... I think, because they're objectively broken. The hard ones would stay hard, and the easy ones with 1/8 spam would be worth nothing. Ignore rolls and spinners too from calculation... I don't think those have anything to do with skill... just mashing speed.
I'm wearing my bulls-eye T-shirt today.
Totally disagree sorry.
First don't call a patten random, no patten is random only if you map in random mood and make it shit. Every patten have its meaning and effect in the map. If the map continue to repeat a patten it looks shit already. And I assume mapper talking in here are not mapping shit.
If you really think a patten is random you should play more and you will not think in that way.
Second in a player's angle, I actually don't know how many times the patten(e.g ddk) have appeared. I play when I see the patten, no matter if that patten appear before. The most extreme case is this.
And on your logic, you think that the program should only check how many times a patten appeared? Then the example map given is really easy right? Please explain on your point on this.
Nope, this is not true.RaneFire wrote:
I think other people's examples of longer patterns involving hand changes is subjectively wrong, although their examples are correct. However this is not due to hand-changes, but due to reading complexity, determining when the pattern changes, requiring a hand-switch. You don't read 12 notes at once, you read them in pieces.
Patterns that don't require leading hand switches are automatically more regular and repetitive. And I don't read streams as a single unit either, I do break them up into parts (albeit using a different "algorithm" than EBAWER); when playing long Firce-style deathstreams I hardly ever miss because I misread, I miss because I mechanically mess up a leading hand switch.
I'd also like to repeat that I don't think every stream with hand switches is extremely hard; I already mentioned before that something like kddkddkddkddkddkddkddkddk is simple due to repetition. It's the irregularity of pattern / hand switches that makes a stream truly hard.
LunaticP
Thanks. I guess I do need to play more taiko to recognise the mapped rhythm better.LunaticP wrote:
Totally disagree sorry.
First don't call a patten random, no patten is random only if you map in random mood and make it shit. Every patten have its meaning and effect in the map. If the map continue to repeat a patten it looks shit already. And I assume mapper talking in here are not mapping shit.
If you really think a patten is random you should play more and you will not think in that way.
Second in a player's angle, I actually don't know how many times the patten(e.g ddk) have appeared. I play when I see the patten, no matter if that patten appear before. The most extreme case is this.
And on your logic, you think that the program should only check how many times a patten appeared? Then the example map given is really easy right? Please explain on your point on this.
Anyway, for the example:
Is not the hardest part executing those patterns because of the speed? It's hard to sync two hands that fast for many people, because that skill is mental, so if the map were 180bpm, would you call it easy then? (Not saying I can play it though)
Also my point was on the adjacent repetitive nature of patterns because of group reading, like in the start. Sure the "ddk" pattern appears a lot, but the sections where it is divided between 1/2 notes makes it harder doesn't it, because the repetition is broken? Or are you saying it's the other way around?
Luna
Yes, I'm trying to pinpoint that irregularity with an algorithm. You make a good point, but it could also be a playstyle difference, and that's where I was trying to stem my argument from... because no one wants to agree. There's arguably more main-hand players though and alternaters have an easier time with hand-switches. Oh well... I tried.Luna wrote:
Nope, this is not true.
Patterns that don't require leading hand switches are automatically more regular and repetitive. And I don't read streams as a single unit either, I do break them up into parts (albeit using a different "algorithm" than EBAWER); when playing long Firce-style deathstreams I hardly ever miss because I misread, I miss because I mechanically mess up a leading hand switch.
I'd also like to repeat that I don't think every stream with hand switches is extremely hard; I already mentioned before that something like kddkddkddkddkddkddkddkddk is simple due to repetition. It's the irregularity of pattern / hand switches that makes a stream truly hard.
IMO I treat the idea of reading and execution as one and the same. If you can't do it consistently, you still have trouble reading it. "Mechanical" may just be the word I was looking for. In osu!std I have this problem, and there's only notes and sliders there... much easier by comparison, but there are still problems because of "mechanical" issues with odd/even numbers of notes.
By that logic I can't read 400 BPM monocolor streamsRaneFire wrote:
IMO I treat the idea of reading and execution as one and the same. If you can't do it consistently, you still have trouble reading it.
You know what I mean. The definition of the word was the problem. Stop being stupid about this just because I'm not a pro taiko'er. It's a game, just because I'm not good at it does not mean I'm stupid.Luna wrote:
By that logic I can't read 400 BPM monocolor streamsRaneFire wrote:
IMO I treat the idea of reading and execution as one and the same. If you can't do it consistently, you still have trouble reading it.
It was also a clarification that did not embody the message I wanted you to read.
I'm not trying to make fun of you or anything, I just disagree on that point.
There are many things that I can read perfectly fine, but can't do mechanically. That's just how it is.
There are many things that I can read perfectly fine, but can't do mechanically. That's just how it is.
Just answer this , which one you think is easier?
1. ddk ddk ddk ddk ddk
2. ddk d k ddk d k ddk
3. ddk ddk d k ddk ddk
1. ddk ddk ddk ddk ddk
2. ddk d k ddk d k ddk
3. ddk ddk d k ddk ddk
1. ddk ddk ddk ddk ddkLunaticP wrote:
Just answer this , which one you think is easier?
1. ddk ddk ddk ddk ddk
2. ddk d k ddk d k ddk
3. ddk ddk d k ddk ddk
Not counting speed limits. Also note that this only has to do with complexity score, nothing else. If you know osu!tp, you'll know std has aim/speed/acc. In Taiko, for example, it would be complexity/speed/acc. If you fill the whole map with ddk, the complexity may be lower, but the speed score will be higher because of density.
I'd like your explanation though, because throwing examples around just clutters the thread. Or at least shoot a hole in my logic that I can see, and let's be done with it.
Actually, for me ddk d k ddk d k ddk... is the easiest out of those patterns. Can't really explain why though, it just flows better than ddk ddk ddk ddk...
ddk ddk d k ddk ddk... would probably feel awkward with a 4/4 signature
ddk ddk d k ddk ddk... would probably feel awkward with a 4/4 signature
yea thisLuna wrote:
Actually, for me ddk d k ddk d k ddk... is the easiest out of those patterns. Can't really explain why though, it just flows better than ddk ddk ddk ddk...
i think just because the single notes are easier to watch timing on
or 5 note pattern repeating instead of 3
#2 for me. For my old really weird playstyle #1 would be easiest but not on really high bpm. Now it's #2 regardless of the bpm, unless I am not really able to do that bpm in general.LunaticP wrote:
Just answer this , which one you think is easier?
1. ddk ddk ddk ddk ddk
2. ddk d k ddk d k ddk
3. ddk ddk d k ddk ddk
Don't feel offended, however you still can't grasp the true difficulty of oni maps (and higher level oni maps) just yet.RaneFire wrote:
Yes, I'm trying to pinpoint that irregularity with an algorithm. You make a good point, but it could also be a playstyle difference, and that's where I was trying to stem my argument from... because no one wants to agree. There's arguably more main-hand players though and alternaters have an easier time with hand-switches. Oh well... I tried.
The thing is, seeing is one thing, hitting what you see is another. Mechanics used to hit certain things, handswitches especially are really complicated to execute. It looks simple, but it's a really pain in the ass thing to do. People who fully alternate for a long time and are really good at it (like EBAWER) don't feel this mechanic problem as much because it's just natural thing to do, but there are not many people on that level.
Let me put it this way, it's not hard after an insane amount of practice, however that just says how hard it actually is, by seeing how much practice you need with it.
Even on low bpm maps, when I see something like [dddkkkd] at 1/6 inside or at the end of a stream, or even isolated, I still can't hit it. It's really complicated to adjust your rhythm and to perform a handswitch at the same time, at my level. Will take a lot of practice for me to perform it well.
Yeah, I figured my inability to read oni's properly would probably be a flaw. So there's more going on than meets the eye. It's gonna be hard to create system around the subjectivity of each pattern though. Thanks for the replies, some responses are always better than none.
I do play full-alternating in Taiko, so maybe this takes a little longer to get into oni's, but full-alternating always felt more natural to play. Watching some of Orukaa's DT plays was even more of an inspiration to go for it since he was so fast and accurate. I was pretty much looking for an excuse to play it and he gave me one.
I'd be interested to know what, or why, you changed. Was there something "wrong" with your previous style? Is there a superior playstyle overall?lolcubes wrote:
#2 for me. For my old really weird playstyle #1 would be easiest but not on really high bpm. Now it's #2 regardless of the bpm, unless I am not really able to do that bpm in general.
I do play full-alternating in Taiko, so maybe this takes a little longer to get into oni's, but full-alternating always felt more natural to play. Watching some of Orukaa's DT plays was even more of an inspiration to go for it since he was so fast and accurate. I was pretty much looking for an excuse to play it and he gave me one.
I swapped to full alternate because I was unable to do streams longer than 9~ notes (well, monocolors or streams which had 2 same colors if you divide a stream on 2x2x2x2 etc were actually fine) or even most simple chains on bpm higher than 150 (kdddkdddkdddkdddkdddk etc) because my playstyle was to cheese every pattern combination in a way I find it easier to play, so every 3~5 note (except for dkkkd, kkkdd and dkdkk, those were really impossible) was really easy to perform for me in any situation, but put them inside a stream and I'm done for.RaneFire wrote:
I'd be interested to know what, or why, you changed. Was there something "wrong" with your previous style? Is there a superior playstyle overall?lolcubes wrote:
#2 for me. For my old really weird playstyle #1 would be easiest but not on really high bpm. Now it's #2 regardless of the bpm, unless I am not really able to do that bpm in general.
Cheesing patterns required a certain way to play them, and streams are just ongoing notes, you can't really "think" on which pattern you have to play while actually playing it, you need some buffer time (I did at least). With training you can get around it I guess, but because of my 2nd problem (chaining simple patterns in a stream) I chose to swap, because the way I learned to play kdd really destroyed my ability to chain kdddkdddkdddk, making my hands entangle and spend insane amounts of strength just to do it badly. You can see it in some of my vids I posted how I cheese the patterns. :p
Now with full alternate, I just hit them naturally and when I see an even amount of dons, I know the next kat is a hand switch.
Yeah, I think Orukaa is an inspiration to everyone. :pRaneFire wrote:
I do play full-alternating in Taiko, so maybe this takes a little longer to get into oni's, but full-alternating always felt more natural to play. Watching some of Orukaa's DT plays was even more of an inspiration to go for it since he was so fast and accurate. I was pretty much looking for an excuse to play it and he gave me one.
While I can still use my old style to play some maps really nicely, I choose not to because full alt is infinitely more fun to me.
Orukaa is not a human at all,no need to kill your hand because of this....
Now the true question come,and this may brings problem because of two common playing style
Select the one you think the hardest
1. ddk k k ddk k k
2. ddk d d ddk d d
3. ddk d k ddk d k
4. ddk k d ddk k d
This result will be put into my program as well
Now the true question come,and this may brings problem because of two common playing style
Select the one you think the hardest
1. ddk k k ddk k k
2. ddk d d ddk d d
3. ddk d k ddk d k
4. ddk k d ddk k d
This result will be put into my program as well
#3 and #4, but they are the same just like #1 and #2
#4 is the hardest for me, then #2, then #3, #1 is the easiest
I have a reason to ask this....
This is to show not only a stream, but the notes after the stream actually make the map looks different. We should not only focus on stream only
Anyway please answer that, because I really want to know the main trend of playing styles
This is to show not only a stream, but the notes after the stream actually make the map looks different. We should not only focus on stream only
Anyway please answer that, because I really want to know the main trend of playing styles
For me it's the same. Maybe #2 would be harder at very high bpm
4->1->2->3 for me, but thats cause i find kat heavy patterns harder than don heavy ones.
ofc you can'tLuna wrote:
By that logic I can't read 400 BPM monocolor streams
So i keep losing ranking by playing normals and fcing it with 99~100%, is this part of the new pp system which try to promote to play harder beatmaps or it wont be part of the new pp system and is just being not functional?
WemadeFOX-solo wrote:
So i keep losing ranking by playing normals and fcing it with 99~100%, is this part of the new pp system which try to promote to play harder beatmaps or it wont be part of the new pp system and is just being not functional?
not functional, play for fun!
yeah, thats why i keep playing normals and hards, because they are fun :>
2>1=4>3LunaticP wrote:
Orukaa is not a human at all,no need to kill your hand because of this....
Now the true question come,and this may brings problem because of two common playing style
Select the one you think the hardest
1. ddk k k ddk k k
2. ddk d d ddk d d
3. ddk d k ddk d k
4. ddk k d ddk k d
This result will be put into my program as well
I agree with the discussion about "HD = HR" in term of difficulty but if it means that "DT+HD = DT+HR"
That sounds not correct to me because as said earlier HR is harder on High BPM and HD harder on Slow BPM most of time.
When you add DT the BPM is almost everytime more than 200 and it makes DT+HR way harder than DT+HD.
imo (and sorry if this has been already said) DTHR should be way more rewarding than DTHD.
Anyway, what I say would have no sense if you already works on HR high bpm more rewarding than HD high bpm...
That sounds not correct to me because as said earlier HR is harder on High BPM and HD harder on Slow BPM most of time.
When you add DT the BPM is almost everytime more than 200 and it makes DT+HR way harder than DT+HD.
imo (and sorry if this has been already said) DTHR should be way more rewarding than DTHD.
Anyway, what I say would have no sense if you already works on HR high bpm more rewarding than HD high bpm...
Not telling that 95% of taiko maps have their OD >=5, which in DTHR gives you 10 at least, up to 12.
I've been reading through this whole thread and I find myself agreeing with OnosakiHito more than anyone else.
Put to put it simple from me:
BPM, the higher the BPM is, the harder it usually gets.
Patterns, if there is more pattern variety in a single stream the harder it is (complexity)
OD, as it requires more accuracy the higher it is.
HP shouldn't be counted too much, but higher HP drain makes you lose more and gain less HP per note.
Mods. DT highest. HR and HD same. FL disabled due to difficulties with DS players and cheaters.
I wouldn't want to disable HDHR since I find it very playable on BPMs lower than
Standard converts should also be disabled since they're not made to be played on Taiko mode.
No, I'm not saying that they can't be hard, I've played a handful of difficult converts that were fun too, but it doesn't change the fact they were made for Standard, not Taiko. If you think disabling it is too drastic, then at least they should count as FAR less than Taiko specifics.
I put my thoughts into this very lazily so please yell at me if you want me to explain something more or you disagree with me.
Pretty sure all these points have been stated so dont mind me \o/
Put to put it simple from me:
BPM, the higher the BPM is, the harder it usually gets.
Patterns, if there is more pattern variety in a single stream the harder it is (complexity)
OD, as it requires more accuracy the higher it is.
HP shouldn't be counted too much, but higher HP drain makes you lose more and gain less HP per note.
Mods. DT highest. HR and HD same. FL disabled due to difficulties with DS players and cheaters.
I wouldn't want to disable HDHR since I find it very playable on BPMs lower than
Standard converts should also be disabled since they're not made to be played on Taiko mode.
No, I'm not saying that they can't be hard, I've played a handful of difficult converts that were fun too, but it doesn't change the fact they were made for Standard, not Taiko. If you think disabling it is too drastic, then at least they should count as FAR less than Taiko specifics.
I put my thoughts into this very lazily so please yell at me if you want me to explain something more or you disagree with me.
Pretty sure all these points have been stated so dont mind me \o/
I still haven't seen a reasonable argument on why standard converted difficulties should not be weighted equally under the same circumstances as taiko specific difficulties should.
"They are not meant to be played in taiko mode" is just stupid. Might as well remove rankings on converted maps completely then. If they are so bad that they shouldn't get taken into account for the pp ranking what is the point in them existing? Besides, those opinions are always based on subjectivity, which shouldn't influence the ranking at all.
For example, if a converted map basically just goes d d k d d d k [...] just treat it the same way you would treat a taiko specific map going like that (even though that's unlikely to happen but you get the point) instead of straight up removing them entirely from the ranking.
Sorry if I repeated anything what has already been said, I haven't followed this thread at all.
"They are not meant to be played in taiko mode" is just stupid. Might as well remove rankings on converted maps completely then. If they are so bad that they shouldn't get taken into account for the pp ranking what is the point in them existing? Besides, those opinions are always based on subjectivity, which shouldn't influence the ranking at all.
For example, if a converted map basically just goes d d k d d d k [...] just treat it the same way you would treat a taiko specific map going like that (even though that's unlikely to happen but you get the point) instead of straight up removing them entirely from the ranking.
Sorry if I repeated anything what has already been said, I haven't followed this thread at all.
There are so many Normal diffs which get converted into something so insanely dumb that I don't even want to start describing how they look. And yes they look harder than insanes, the only easier things are OD and HP.
"Not meant to be played in taiko", how is that not reasonable?
As long as standard converts don't meet the ranking criteria (and never will), I vote against them being counted towards pp. While some may convert well, most of them don't. Imagine if any retarded taiko specific maps are allowed to get ranked. It's kinda the same.
"Not meant to be played in taiko", how is that not reasonable?
As long as standard converts don't meet the ranking criteria (and never will), I vote against them being counted towards pp. While some may convert well, most of them don't. Imagine if any retarded taiko specific maps are allowed to get ranked. It's kinda the same.
I think you should be careful if you use rankable as the judging point. Some taiko maps actually step between rank and unrank. And if someone find a map which is converted but looks rankable this may lead to more argument.
In technical way i need to study on how a map is converted to taiko and see a program can calculate that.. ..
In technical way i need to study on how a map is converted to taiko and see a program can calculate that.. ..
Except we're trying to judge map difficulty and player skill, not rank maps or judge map quality. If a guy gets a good score on a ridiculously stupid and difficult ranked map, it should count for skill, as long as it's already ranked. Getting a good score on a difficult map of bad quality is still getting a good score on a difficult map.lolcubes wrote:
Imagine if any retarded taiko specific maps are allowed to get ranked. It's kinda the same.
What cubes is getting at is that many of those maps under taiko ranking criteria wouldn't even have charts at all if they had gone for ranking as taiko maps. Why should we consider scores for maps that have unrankable things in them at all for a mode that we already have hundreds upon hundreds of ranked taiko specific maps that all meet ranking criteria?
Converted maps had their place ages ago when there were very few ranked low difficulty maps for taiko. They filled the LARGE gap between starting taiko fresh, and playing Oni difficulty maps (due to taiko specific mapsets not being rankable back then and people only making Oni guest difficulties)... but now that we have those mapsets, they really don't serve a purpose anymore. While I don't think we should remove the rankings from these maps, we definitely don't need to consider them for our ranking system.
Converted maps had their place ages ago when there were very few ranked low difficulty maps for taiko. They filled the LARGE gap between starting taiko fresh, and playing Oni difficulty maps (due to taiko specific mapsets not being rankable back then and people only making Oni guest difficulties)... but now that we have those mapsets, they really don't serve a purpose anymore. While I don't think we should remove the rankings from these maps, we definitely don't need to consider them for our ranking system.
Well, here's my point, Tasha. A lot of this thread is being wasted on the argument on whether or not converts should count or not. Let's wait until a system is actually made, THEN we can decide on what to do with converts. For now, the thread should just be about coming up with a system to work with. Like how much should slider velocity affect difficulty or how much certain bpm would affect difficulty and whatnot.
If you remember there are a lot of converted easy's performance spamming the best performances in the previous pp system, and everyone could tell that those were not really "good" performance when compared with those which are performed with Oni maps. I do think it is essential to discuss whether should we count in converted map performances or not to.
well, some people actually have fun through FL. It gives players with lesser raw skill (considering legit ones in this case) an opportunity to compete evenly with higher raw skill, non-FL players (although memorization itself is already a skill imo; only some people can actually do it in fewer tries than anyone else/do hardcore, non-repetitive stuffs. Take baka_baka_Koishi, for example. Regardless, it's not really raw, but still). Although I haven't tried it at all, I think it's NOT impossible to actually train your reflexes with FL, but then again it's much more tedious to train than with other mods, thus making people not go through it. Just my opinion.1.
I agree with XK2238 about FL stuff. It is possible to train your reflexes to play FL, i got better and better playing with it, BUT it is only readable at low bpm taiko maps and low SV/BPM converted ones. Also depends on the ammount of notes in the map, since the visibility area gets smaller when you reach 100 and 200 combo. Otherwise FLit is useless on taiko maps and imo should not count on them, cause memorization is not a competitive type of skill.. ANY player can memorize a map, it just depends on the ammount of attempts each one takes to do it. But there are players who can memorize easier than others and can't play hard patterns with good accuraccy or can't read high BPM on taiko maps.
2.
This game is a rythim game ( meaning of course that you need to play in the right rythim), so accuracy should count way more than other mods, meaning that DT and HR should be more rewarded since it raises OD.Takes skill to play HD too, meaning you can follow the rythim, but anyway HR>HD. By the way, HR&HD IS playable.
3.
I think converted maps SHOULD count as well, because there are songs you like, and there's not a taiko mode on it. But the converted ones shouldn't be weighted as much as taiko maps, UNLESS Tom94 comes up with a nice system.
Just because HR raises OD doesn't mean you'd need less rhythmic accuracy or playing HD.MeeHawk wrote:
This game is a rythim game ( meaning of course that you need to play in the right rythim), so accuracy should count way more than other mods, meaning that DT and HR should be more rewarded since it raises OD.Takes skill to play HD too, meaning you can follow the rythim, but anyway HR>HD. By the way, HR&HD IS playable.
In fact, by making the scrolling speed (or SV in osu terms) faster, it affects your accuracy, usually it makes you play more accurately rather than when you play with low scrolling speed. It might be a bad comparison, but have you ever noticed how usually beatmania IIDX players play with high Hi-Speed (scrolling speed) and a lot of people use curtains as well? It's because reaction time kicks in when you play with faster scrolling and less notes on-screen, often making you more accurate. So HR should stay the same as HD as the difficulty is very equal.
You can still try and hit the notes by looking at when the notes hit the circle with HR (bad playing choice). With HD you can't as the notes vanish, so you'd need equally as much rhythmic accuracy with both mods, in my opinion.
In my honest opinion that's a rather weak argument. There is an easy fix to it: Map it yourself.MeeHawk wrote:
I think converted maps SHOULD count as well, because there are songs you like, and there's not a taiko mode on it. But the converted ones shouldn't be weighted as much as taiko maps, UNLESS Tom94 comes up with a nice system.
Or even better, if you find a pending taiko set for said song, help it get ranked by modding it!
Agreed. The old pp system was very broken because you could rocket up the ranking list by getting some decent scores on low difficulty converts, so this discussion is much needed if we want a new and working ranking/pp system.Jikson[m9] wrote:
If you remember there are a lot of converted easy's performance spamming the best performances in the previous pp system, and everyone could tell that those were not really "good" performance when compared with those which are performed with Oni maps. I do think it is essential to discuss whether should we count in converted map performances or not to.