Flask wrote:

OwO

[General]

1. 總覺得tags該加上flute orz

[Hard+]

1. AR-1 纠结中……
2. 00:49:167 (2,3,4) - 試試弄個圈? 会和后面的长slider有叠一点。。所以先保持现状Q.Q
3. 03:22:617 (1) - Finish如何 爽！
4. 03:46:167 (7,9) - 看起來這兩個ctrl+G 会比較flow 感觉spacing有点蛋痛..先不改惹~
5. 04:14:721 (4) - 開头略空 建議+whistle 其实还好啦~
6. 04:18:757 (7) - 这sv略慢 nc ovo 好~

[Lunatic]

1. 01:12:567 (3,7) - 硬要說的話第三個slider point可以再拉開一点 会比較好看o.o 感觉还好:3
2. 02:22:767 (1,2,3,4,5) - 这排列有点偏了/.\ :oo
3. 02:33:717 (4,5,6) - 略不flow 把(5,6)擺在slider揚去的地方o.o 啊这里是因为音乐也有个转折所以连打有拐到下面去~
4. 02:43:392 (2,3) - 妮瑪我被嚇的半死finish出毛啊QAQ!!! bgm有锣的声音所以finish惹。。是有点大咱把声音改小惹~
5. 02:52:767 (5) - Nc fixed~
6. 03:23:367 (1,2,3,4) - 弄個正方形? 没有“甩”的那种感觉~
   排版有点亂不过沒差-v-

-v-加油! Star~

OnosakiHito wrote:

Just sneeking in to mod some taikos.

[jom's Taiko Muzukashii]

General: Use the same audio volumen in all timeline sections

00:46:017 (9) - I would suggest to use a don here. Less kats would give the other kept kats a bigger effect.
01:02:367 (68) - better change this to a don. Dosen't plays that nice when it starts as kat. Also you didn't used kat at 01:05:967 (80) -
01:51:267 (281) - better move this to 01:51:117 as kat because of the high pitch which you follow
01:58:017 (309) - same as above. Move to 01:57:867
02:05:967 (343) - kat would be better having k k d d d d is better as k k k d d d because of the leaning number.
02:12:867 (368) - having some gaps would be good, since this is a muzukashii, so delete this note please. Also you used allready one before, so please follow this way of mapping.
02:15:267 (376) - ^
02:20:367 (400,401,402,403,404,405,406) - I think making all notes to finisher would be nice.
02:22:167 (406) - don finisher, fits maybe better.
02:23:967 (1) - I rather suggest a slider here which goes up to 02:25:767
02:45:567 - Use in this part more kats and les dons, follow more the high-pitches and have gaps! This is a muzukashii, so it needs more gaps, especially at such weak parts.
03:04:767 (180) - finisher, because you used them before too.
03:07:167 (191) - ^
02:45:567~03:03:567 - More breaks/gaps! (also more breaks/gaps after this section of course)
03:53:667 (209,210) - delete this notes and put a tripplet at 03:53:667 - ddd with one more don at 03:53:517 - I think that fits better.
03:54:117 - move timeline to 03:54:267
04:05:817(x) - adding one d would be good here, because of the sound in the music.
04:12:117 (293,294,295,296,297,298) - give every note a timeline to accelerate them down up to this note: 04:13:221 (299) - to avoid this overlap.
04:13:221 - up to here use 80% volumen.
04:18:157 - last timing is wrong, for now move the note there to the blue tick.My english skil is poor...so,I do not know what it means. more easy english plz(´；ω；｀)　04:18:157 to ?time　　　

Kind of hard this Muzukashii because you got too less gaps/breaks. Gaps would be also good because you have hard 1/2 patterns.


[jom's Taiko Oni]

General: Use the same audio volumen in all timeline sections

02:04:167 (90) - move this note to 02:04:317 because of the beats.
02:27:342 (231) - making this note to d would fit probably better
02:45:567 - Use in this part some more kats.Changed! and check plz~
03:54:117 - move timeline to 03:54:267
04:18:157 - last timing is wrongMuzu last ^ same

That's all for Oni. I don't like to change too much on someone style or diff. it self if it is overall fine.
Maybe here and there some notes could be changes, but it's no need to.


Good luck.

OnosakiHito wrote:

@Straberry: the last timing is wrong. It's a bit too slow.

Flask wrote:

[A32's Hard]

1. 感覺OD+1
2. 01:15:867 - +note
3. 01:43:767 - ^
4. 02:22:467 - ^
5. 01:32:217 (1) - 提前1/2拍
6. 02:35:817 (1) - ^
7. 01:44:067 (2) - clap
8. 02:10:767 (1,2) - 这感覺有要blanket 做做看
9. 02:23:967 (2) - 这有点討厭 感覺上这個会更可愛
   
   example.jpg

   
10. 02:41:967 (2) - (end) clap
11. 02:48:267 (4) - (reserve) ^
12. 03:11:967 (1,2) - (nazi)如果可以的話在包好一点
13. 03:16:767 (1,2) - ^
14. 03:31:167 (1) - (end) clap
15. 03:32:967 (1) - 節奏改 nc
16. 03:39:267 (7) - Spacing有点錯 会誤導哦
17. 03:50:667 (2) - clap
    草苺你真不該把它改成Hard 因為這很明顯就是N的spacing ==+

1. 00:33:488 (1) - Add circle here, and:
2. 00:34:150 (x) - Start the spinner here
3. 00:36:802 (x) - Start the second spinner here, it should follow the piano (:
4. 00:42:567 (1,2) - ...maybe you can start (1) in the center here and put (2) around ~y:244? (or a manual stacking from the bottom or bottom-right should flow well also, because your next pattern are flowing upward)
5. 01:23:967 (1,2,3) - ...simplify the rhythm like this? I don't hear much instrument o.o
   
   SPOILER

   
6. 01:37:017 (7) - ...not really a suggestion to keep the diff lower, but I feel this will be much more intuitive if put in ~x:170 y:348 (more to the left) because (7,1)'s spacing is quite tricky here (:
7. 01:56:367 (6) - New combo, again for intuitivity
8. 02:14:067 (4) - Replace into a single circle? The instrument isn't that hectic...
9. 02:49:167 (1,2) - This spacing looks too far o.o
10. 03:10:617 (4) - Well, I believe splitting this into two separate circles (possibly stacked) will give a better feeling from the instrument (also more intuitive spacing)...
11. 03:28:167 (1) - Err, I don't really get this slider, symmetry like this plays better imo:
    
    SPOILER

    
12. 03:43:617 (1,2) - Try to get these two stacked in ~x:139 y:288 instead? imo it'll be more intuitive because there's no sudden jump (like you currently did in (1,2))

1. 00:33:488 (1,1) - Same as Insane
2. 00:45:417 (2) - This note can be deleted though (and remove (1)'s new combo afterwards)
3. 00:57:417 (9,1) - Uhm, I do believe you can make this triangle jump smaller by stacking (1) to (7) instead of (5)... But I don't think it'll be more fun to play ._.
4. 01:11:742 (2) - Remove this note to kill the triple? imo it'll play better if no triple here because of your next blue (1,2)'s jump~
5. 01:23:367 (1) - For me it's better if you put this around ~y:293 (vertical formation) because you're somehow forcing a player to do a stack after jump here, which plays quite unnatural...
6. 01:35:742 (6) - Err, this quintuple is definitely too much here orz, the fourth note isn't required imo to fit the music...
7. 01:40:617 (1,1) - Hmm, why new combo so early? (it may be beautiful, yep, but it's kinda hard to see especially for HR players because there are no followpoint)
8. 02:02:442 (3) - ...definitely not very intuitive to read orz, at least make this slider face another direction (up-right or up-left)
9. 02:05:667 (9,10,11) - Uhm, I don't think this triple plays really well here, it's kinda hard (I prefer a jump here without (10), it plays much better before the spinner imo)
10. 02:08:592 (1) - Start the spinner either here or 02:08:667? I'm very sure there's nothing on 1/4 after previous spinner...
11. 02:30:042 (7) - Again, this note can be deleted because no instrument here... Your call though (:
12. 03:53:667 (1) - This is just personal issue, but I think light blue combo color will be more intuitive (because previously it was blue)
13. 04:06:267 (2,3,4,1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,3) - (uhm, yes, I think this is the hardest part orz ._.) - maybe change into repeating slider? (or circle + short 1/4 slider)
14. 04:13:783 (3,4) - Err, what happened to spacing here o.o

Niva wrote:

Well, my opinion:

As I said in forum PM, what I'm worried about isn't the difficulty gap, but there are three Insanes...
Well, these suggestions are meant to lower the diffs (not hitsounding mod/aesthetic mod/etc) :

[General]

-> Rename Hard to Challenging (or something like that) and Insane to Hard, it's not that hard imo... Fixed~
-> Also, just mentioning, I don't think you should include skin creator in tags (:Fixed. thanks for remind :p

[Insane]

1. 00:33:488 (1) - Add circle here, and:
2. 00:34:150 (x) - Start the spinner here
3. 00:36:802 (x) - Start the second spinner here, it should follow the piano (: changed~
4. 00:42:567 (1,2) - ...maybe you can start (1) in the center here and put (2) around ~y:244? (or a manual stacking from the bottom or bottom-right should flow well also, because your next pattern are flowing upward) changed~
5. 01:23:967 (1,2,3) - ...simplify the rhythm like this? I don't hear much instrument o.o nice>< fixed
   
   SPOILER

   
6. 01:37:017 (7) - ...not really a suggestion to keep the diff lower, but I feel this will be much more intuitive if put in ~x:170 y:348 (more to the left) because (7,1)'s spacing is quite tricky here (: ok~
7. 01:56:367 (6) - New combo, again for intuitivity added
8. 02:14:067 (4) - Replace into a single circle? The instrument isn't that hectic... i think it's ok to follow the rings from instrument, and it is also symmetrical with the last slider. no change for now
9. 02:49:167 (1,2) - This spacing looks too far o.o decreased~
10. 03:10:617 (4) - Well, I believe splitting this into two separate circles (possibly stacked) will give a better feeling from the instrument (also more intuitive spacing)... fixed~ and stacked
11. 03:28:167 (1) - Err, I don't really get this slider, symmetry like this plays better imo: good. changed :p
    
    SPOILER

    
12. 03:43:617 (1,2) - Try to get these two stacked in ~x:139 y:288 instead? imo it'll be more intuitive because there's no sudden jump (like you currently did in (1,2)) stacked~

[Lunatic]

1. 00:33:488 (1,1) - Same as Insane all fixed~
2. 00:45:417 (2) - This note can be deleted though (and remove (1)'s new combo afterwards) i think it's fun to play because the intrument is furious
3. 00:57:417 (9,1) - Uhm, I do believe you can make this triangle jump smaller by stacking (1) to (7) instead of (5)... But I don't think it'll be more fun to play ._. yea fixed
4. 01:11:742 (2) - Remove this note to kill the triple? imo it'll play better if no triple here because of your next blue (1,2)'s jump~ i think it follows the music better
5. 01:23:367 (1) - For me it's better if you put this around ~y:293 (vertical formation) because you're somehow forcing a player to do a stack after jump here, which plays quite unnatural... fixed~ but swapped (1,2) for a more comfy spacing :3
6. 01:35:742 (6) - Err, this quintuple is definitely too much here orz, the fourth note isn't required imo to fit the music... the flute is continuous down, so i think it is fine for now, and it is also more interesting and fluency imo :3
7. 01:40:617 (1,1) - Hmm, why new combo so early? (it may be beautiful, yep, but it's kinda hard to see especially for HR players because there are no followpoint) forgot to remove it >_< fixed
8. 02:02:442 (3) - ...definitely not very intuitive to read orz, at least make this slider face another direction (up-right or up-left) face to up-right~
9. 02:05:667 (9,10,11) - Uhm, I don't think this triple plays really well here, it's kinda hard (I prefer a jump here without (10), it plays much better before the spinner imo) removed (10) and made a jump between (8,9,10,11) :3
10. 02:08:592 (1) - Start the spinner either here or 02:08:667? I'm very sure there's nothing on 1/4 after previous spinner... yes but i like this pattern ;-;
11. 02:30:042 (7) - Again, this note can be deleted because no instrument here... Your call though (: same as above~
12. 03:53:667 (1) - This is just personal issue, but I think light blue combo color will be more intuitive (because previously it was blue) changed~
13. 04:06:267 (2,3,4,1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,3) - (uhm, yes, I think this is the hardest part orz ._.) - maybe change into repeating slider? (or circle + short 1/4 slider) i think the slider can not express well for the ardent part
14. 04:13:783 (3,4) - Err, what happened to spacing here o.o reduced a bit to make them looks reasonable :3

(again, they're just suggestion for diff spread)

I'm still tired after OWC orz... I'm not happy with this mod to be honest >_<
I hope this helps, good luck Strawberry~ it's a great help! thank you Niva-Chan ^^

wcx19911123 wrote:

[A32's Hard]
02:00:567 (1) - I'd like to volume this slider up a bit, it's kinda quiet now
02:11:217 - make this slider repeat at here and end at 02:11:667 - , fit the song much better
02:17:067 (4) - move this note to 02:17:217 - ? fit the song better imo
02:19:467 (4) - and move this one to 02:19:617 - if you fixed ^
03:53:817 (5) - this slow down is really hard to read, I suggest use special shape with 1.0x speed. and please make the spacing between 4 and 5 is the same as between 5 and 1(don't see number but see pattern itself)

spboxer3 wrote:

※ Notice

red is unrankable issue.
blue is recommended to fix.
Black is just suggestion.

general

• 
  Settings
  (For the setting/general issue.)
  

1. BPM/offset (red timing section) must be consistency.

Hard

• 
  
  Overlaps
  (Some overlaps of notes/sliders in this diff don't look good. Here is a list of beats that overlap each other could space them farther apart. yep. It's just suggest and nazi. you can ignore this par)
  

1. 01:33:867 (6) - (move to x124,y172 avoid overlaps.)

mapping
(These are about your patterns.Mostly for the suggest, Just some unrankable issue I will use red color to highlight it.)

1. 00:49:617 (3,4) - 說實話的 這個pattern讓我感覺到flow 缺角了Orz... 試試看這樣吧:
   
   00:49:617 (3) - 在x:116,y:244
   00:49:767 (4) - 在x:176,y:308
   

說說對這個diff的看法吧 事實上這diff做的不錯 音效和節奏的部分都挺合音樂 但是關於排列的地方就相對比較沒有這麼突出了. 注意各個物件之間的連結flow 例如:01:25:017 (4,5,6) - 5,6之間連結的不錯 但是4,5之間看來就不是那麼好了 再稍微調整下吧.

Lunatic

• 
  
  mapping
  (These are about your patterns.Mostly for the suggest, Just some unrankable issue I will use red color to highlight it.)
  

1. 00:11:217 (7,8,9,10) - Err... a bit confuse rhythm for play. after all, it's a calm part. so you can try to used slider avoid this issue:
   
   
2. 00:47:767 (8,9) - 對這種自創的節奏(非音樂本身的 1/6 or 1/3)強烈建議使用slider slider的好處是好打 而且對player也可以了解你所想表達的節奏 感觉这里spacing还蛮好认啊。。><而且改成slider的话感觉有点太简单(PIA
   
   
3. 00:57:567 (1) - 遮得我都看不到了(combo color+300.png)... 給幾個方案:
   1.) move to x172,y88 ((這地方是重音 用finish及jump來表現這個位置 √
   2.) remove this note ((事實上 這個位置的聲音本來就不大 而不加note本來就很適合
   
   
4. 01:13:842 - & 01:13:917 - add note? make it consistent with 01:09:342 (7,8) - ,01:11:742 (2,3) -
   
   
5. 01:46:167 (1,2,3,4,5) - :< (2,5)reverse section & (3,4)reverse section to make it counterclockwise flow. 抱歉我是右撇子 突然轉成順時鐘的打法實在很不流順 而且非常拗手...>_>
   
   
6. 03:14:067 (7,8,9) - same as 00:47:767 (8,9) -
   
   
7. 03:33:042 - (rhythm issue) obvious have a beat. give you 2 possible solutions:
   
   √
   or
   
   個人傾向於第一種方案 是合這個節奏

spboxer3 wrote:

A32's Challenging

• 
  Settings
  (For the setting. like Song Setup/timing or break time~)
  

1. duplicate timeline:
   04:13:221 - (not change slider velocity. only change hitsound/volume so please remove green line.)
   04:15:481 - ^
   04:16:308 - ^
   04:17:196 - ^
   04:17:657 - ^
   04:18:157 - ^诶...还要换vol于是就先不改了..

mapping
(These are about your patterns.Mostly for the suggest, Just some unrankable issue I will use red color to highlight it.)

1. 00:32:814 (5) - unsnap slider end (手動算吧... 算好了給你吧↓):
   

   400,268,32814,2,0,B|448:240|504:272|504:272|484:232,1,149

   fixed!
   
   
2. 00:48:267 (2) - back 1/2 rhythm? (looks you follow the flute before, so... keep it. :>)nice~
   
   
3. 01:21:567 (1,2,3,4) - pattern shape...changed a bit :3
   
   
4. 00:48:267 (2) - obvious rhythm. recommend to this sentence (2 at 01:43:767 - ):
   
   rhythm

   
   fixed~
   
   
5. 02:43:017 - rhythm issue. move 02:43:167 (4) - to 02:43:017 - ? 可以明顯的看出02:43:017 - 是重音 而02:43:167 - 是沒有打擊(鼓/vocal)的 所以建議改一下
   
   
6. 02:49:167 (6,1) - actually, It's not a good pattern (reverse cover by 02:49:767 - )changed a bit
7. 03:32:367 (2) - wrong rhythm. it's 3/4 not 1/3 rhythm. it must be fixed.fixed!(话说刚才那个unsnap居然没用红字!

Milkshake wrote:

irc moddo

long long log

22:47 Strawberry: thanks ^^
22:48 Milkshake: 00:13:617- cancel repeat, it doesn't fit the music
22:48 Strawberry: yea
22:48 Strawberry: done
22:48 Strawberry: :3
22:48 Milkshake: 00:16:488- RNC,
22:48 Milkshake: 00:17:983-NC
22:49 Strawberry: k
22:49 Milkshake: 00:19:331- http://osu.ppy.sh/ss/522094 i think it'd make nice flow to curve those sliders
22:51 Strawberry: umm~~i'd prefer to keep my idea~ sry~
22:52 Milkshake: 00:43:167- you know, the angle of those sliders is pretty high, i don't know how i didn't combobreak.. i mean, they look cool, but it ruins
22:52 Milkshake: the whole flow if you ask mr
22:52 Milkshake: http://osu.ppy.sh/ss/522098 i think slider like this could help since it gives more fast to the next one, or something like that
22:52 Milkshake: but i think you can keep it since it looks nice
22:54 Strawberry: k. i'll try to make it plays better~
22:55 Milkshake: 00:51:417(7,8,1,2,3,4,5,6)- http://osu.ppy.sh/ss/522101 maybe like this? this jump was kinda difficult
22:55 Milkshake: the bpm is kinda fast and.. i think it ruined the flow.
22:56 Milkshake: 00:53:142- a bit overmapped. same goes to 00:55:542-
22:56 Milkshake: since you made lot of streams and stacks, kinda overused them at some points
22:57 Strawberry: yea you got it
22:57 Strawberry: http://puu.sh/1znp1 ~
22:58 Milkshake: 00:56:292- http://osu.ppy.sh/ss/522105 please make it like this. the flow from 4 to 1,2,3 is totally broken like that
22:59 Strawberry: done~
23:00 Milkshake: 01:09:342- i find those blue-tick notes very overmapped too
23:00 Milkshake: you made it some more times
23:00 Milkshake: maybe i'm deaf but i think it's kinda hard ;_;"
23:02 Strawberry: umm
23:02 Milkshake: 01:16:392(6,7,8)- maybe stack to 01:16:767-? it looks and plays better
23:02 Strawberry: but it plays fun and not very overmapped imo~
23:03 Milkshake: yeah, i think you can keep it where i mentioned but delete in 01:11:742, can't explain why it plays better
23:04 Milkshake: 01:13:842- sounds out of rhythm..
23:04 Strawberry: yea~
23:04 Strawberry: ok
23:04 Milkshake: 01:13:917- same. i think you can stack 1 to the end of 7
23:05 Milkshake: http://osu.ppy.sh/ss/522113 :3 like this
23:05 Milkshake: create cool pattern with the next combo too~
23:06 Milkshake: 01:19:917- http://osu.ppy.sh/ss/522114 maybe like this? sorry for lame stacking lol, just wanted to give the idea
23:06 Strawberry: nice x3
23:07 Strawberry: umm, i want to make a repeat move here~
23:09 Milkshake: 01:26:367(1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8)- this pattern is pretty hard, i did something else
23:09 Milkshake: sec, i'll take some screenshots
23:10 Strawberry: np
23:10 Milkshake: http://osu.ppy.sh/ss/522118 like this maybe? 8 i stacked with the othesr
23:14 Milkshake: http://osu.ppy.sh/ss/522126 maybe like this? (3 stacked under 2- and (3,4,5,6,1) creates a pattern of >
23:14 Milkshake: which is a bit better
23:15 Milkshake: 01:29:817- blue ticks isn't good here. maybe like http://osu.ppy.sh/ss/522128
23:16 Strawberry: ok~
23:16 Milkshake: 01:30:717- maybe a little slider+reverse here? it throws you back to 1 and it plays better
23:16 Milkshake: if need a screenshot tell me
23:18 Strawberry: changed :3
23:18 Milkshake: http://osu.ppy.sh/ss/522130 also make 1 more like that, better connection to 2. i got the triple of 3,4,5 upper too
23:18 Milkshake: 01:34:617- blue tick doesn't fit ;_;
23:19 Milkshake: 01:35:517(3,4,5,6,7)- why here 5 notes but in next combo only 3? i think you better delete 6 and move 7 a bit down ofc because
23:19 Milkshake: spacing
23:21 Strawberry: i think it plays well ;_; keep for now..
23:21 Milkshake: 01:37:017- same issue with blue tick..i think there are only some points in the song where it fits. but it ruins the rhyhm like that imo. if
23:21 Milkshake: you wanna change, this- http://osu.ppy.sh/ss/522134 could be good
23:21 Milkshake: oh wait
23:21 Milkshake: ignore it
23:21 Milkshake: it's fine nvm @_@;; heard again
23:22 Milkshake: 01:39:042- overmapped :v
23:22 Strawberry: yeah it's really a overmapped diff :p
23:22 Milkshake: yeah lol it's not so nice D:
23:22 Milkshake: sometimes it's fun
23:23 Milkshake: but it's a bit too much, i hardly could pass it with A
23:23 Milkshake: hehe
23:23 Milkshake: and i passed it once already
23:23 Strawberry: xp
23:23 Milkshake: http://osu.ppy.sh/ss/522138 maybe likes this could be nice (01:39:417)
23:24 Strawberry: good :3
23:24 Milkshake: 01:44:142- delete maybe?
23:25 Strawberry: there has a beat i think Q_Q
23:25 Milkshake: nah there isn't, but okay
23:26 Strawberry: :p
23:26 Milkshake: 01:50:967(3,4)- did those on 1/3 rhythm like this http://osu.ppy.sh/ss/522143 but i'm not sure if it's alright
23:26 Milkshake: i somewhat think it fits, but check this
23:27 Strawberry: ok~
23:27 Milkshake: it fits?
23:27 Strawberry: i see~
23:28 Milkshake: 01:52:767- maybe make this stream as 1 like? like, straighten? it's a bit hard :d
23:29 Strawberry: nope Q_Q, i test in playback rate 50% and 1/3 rhythm is out
23:29 Milkshake: oh
23:29 Milkshake: idk why it sounds okay with 100% aha
23:29 Strawberry: lol
23:30 Milkshake: 01:56:667-http://osu.ppy.sh/ss/522148 maybe like this?
23:31 Strawberry: done~
23:31 Milkshake: 01:56:967- whistle and not clap
23:31 Milkshake: 01:57:267- clap not whistle lol
23:32 Strawberry: x3 fixed
23:32 Milkshake: you did more hitsounds mistakes here
23:32 Milkshake: wait
23:32 Milkshake: @_@
23:32 Strawberry: oh ><
23:33 Milkshake: 01:58:767-clap
23:33 Milkshake: 01:59:367- whistle only
23:34 Strawberry: done~
23:34 Milkshake: 01:58:467- clap
23:36 Milkshake: 02:04:917- i think long stream would fit http://osu.ppy.sh/ss/522154 ignore the ugly stream, just example lol
23:37 Milkshake: 02:08:067- end spinner here, 02:08:217- start new one here~
23:37 Milkshake: 02:09:867- just suggestion, i think you better stack 1,2 with the others aswell
23:38 Strawberry: fixed~
23:38 Strawberry: and 02:09:867 (1,2) - , i think the pattern is fun to play~
23:38 Milkshake: 02:15:267(1,2)- it's silent here, i think you should delete both.
23:39 Milkshake: i know you wanted to create more rhythm here but i think it's kinda useless
23:39 Milkshake: lol
23:39 Milkshake: well not exactly silent but i think a pause here is nice
23:40 Strawberry: x3 umm~hesitate this
23:40 Milkshake: 02:15:867- lol big jump, big big yeah but i think http://osu.ppy.sh/ss/522159 is better
23:40 Milkshake: it's not 1/1 rhythm so it's a bit hard
23:41 Milkshake: ah about the silent part, i think it's just nice ofc you don't have to change it, but idk how to explain why it sounds better
23:41 Strawberry: well :3
23:42 Milkshake: if you wanna keep them, i think stacking them to 1 is a good idea
23:42 Milkshake: http://osu.ppy.sh/ss/522161 like this~~
23:42 Strawberry: nice~ changed~
23:43 Milkshake: :3 okay
23:45 Milkshake: 02:18:417- i think this jump is kinda too big.. i did this: http://osu.ppy.sh/ss/522169
23:45 Milkshake: created a star, it looks cool and plays better hehe
23:46 Milkshake: 02:25:992- overmapped ;_______;
23:46 Milkshake: http://osu.ppy.sh/ss/522171 did like this
23:46 Strawberry: changed~
23:47 Milkshake: 02:26:217(1,2,3,4,5,6)- cool pattern haha
23:47 Strawberry: ok deleted 7 and moved the next circle to 2's tail
23:47 Milkshake: okay~~
23:47 Strawberry: xp
23:48 Milkshake: 02:28:167- stack 9,10 with 11
23:48 Milkshake: better cool jump ;D
23:48 Strawberry: k~
23:49 Milkshake: 02:30:867- remove clap
23:50 Milkshake: 02:30:792- overmappu >~<
23:50 Strawberry: ~removed
23:50 Milkshake: 02:33:267- stack 1,2 with 3, next combo stack 5,6 under 4
23:50 Milkshake: it's kinda annoying pattern..
23:51 Milkshake: 02:34:767- move to x:448 y:344
23:52 Milkshake: 02:39:942- remove maybe?
23:56 Milkshake: that's it i guess
23:56 Milkshake: want me to go over NC?
23:57 Strawberry: yes plz~ ^^
23:57 Milkshake: okay
23:57 Milkshake: 00:20:679- RNC
23:58 Milkshake: 00:22:702- RNC 00:23:376-NC
23:58 Strawberry: done :>
23:59 Milkshake: 00:26:072- RNC
23:59 Milkshake: 00:33:488- i think you should remove the note
00:00 Strawberry: ok~
00:00 Milkshake: 00:44:367-RNC
00:01 Milkshake: 00:45:267-RNC if you want
00:01 Milkshake: 00:46:767- RNC
00:02 Milkshake: 00:53:517-RNC
00:03 Milkshake: 00:55:167 NC
00:03 Milkshake: 00:55:467-RNC
00:03 Strawberry: done~
00:04 Milkshake: 01:08:367-RNC
00:04 Milkshake: 01:10:767-RNC
00:04 Milkshake: 01:11:367-RNC too
00:05 Strawberry: done~
00:05 Milkshake: 01:14:667-RNC
00:05 Milkshake: 01:15:567-NC
00:05 Strawberry: done~
00:06 Milkshake: 01:17:667-RNC
00:06 Milkshake: 01:18:117-RNC
00:06 Milkshake: 01:19:917-RNC
00:06 Strawberry: done~
00:06 Milkshake: 01:22:167-RNC
00:07 Milkshake: 01:23:367-RNC
00:07 Milkshake: lol so many RNC D::::::
00:07 Strawberry: yea a bit abuse ;_;
00:08 Milkshake: i think it's better with long combos at those parts but dw
00:08 Milkshake: the chorus is better :v
00:08 Strawberry: yap :3
00:08 Milkshake: 01:39:417-NC
00:09 Milkshake: 01:40:017-RNC
00:09 Strawberry: i used to set nc randomly lool
00:09 Strawberry: done~
00:09 Milkshake: yeahhhh
00:09 Milkshake: it's very random lol
00:09 Milkshake: suggestion:
00:09 Strawberry: huh
00:09 Milkshake: 01:46:167-RNC
00:09 Milkshake: 01:46:767- NC
00:09 Milkshake: i think it's cool
00:09 Milkshake: :O
00:09 Milkshake: but it's fine like that too
00:10 Milkshake: 01:50:367-RNC
00:10 Milkshake: 01:50:967-NC
00:10 Strawberry: maybe a bit confuse if i rnc here 01:46:167 - ? ;_;
00:11 Milkshake: yeah i told you it's suggestion
00:11 Milkshake: it's fine
00:11 Strawberry: gotcha~
00:11 Milkshake: 02:01:017-NC
00:11 Milkshake: 02:01:467-RNC
00:11 Milkshake: 02:01:917-RNC
00:12 Strawberry: done :3
00:13 Milkshake: nice that in the end the combos are good
00:13 Milkshake: lol
00:14 Strawberry: xp
00:14 Milkshake: yeah all is fine
00:14 Milkshake: that's it~~~~~~

wcx19911123 wrote:

AIBAT说红线还是不一致，最好自己检查下然后改改再找我，注意snap 0.0

wcx19911123 wrote:

[A32's Challenging]
02:02:667 (2,1) - wrong spacing here √

[jom's Taiko Oni]
00:41:967 - this section's volume in is tooooooo low.. use normal volume please.. √

[BakaNA]
03:41:217 (3,4) - ctrl+g, flow will be much better √

call me back then

BCI wrote:

Lunatic Red Eyes Invisible Full Moon Imperishable Night th08 in tags pls (original theme + game)

Flask wrote:

我是草莓腦殘粉

Melophobia wrote:

the title has a terrible translation and obviously wrong. needs to be changed.
and wrong artist coincides too. Nakamura Masaki is the flutist so i think it cannot be artist.

Artist: Ranko (ランコ)
Title: Yoru Naku Usagi wa Yume wo Miru (夜啼く兎は夢を見る)

kanpakyin wrote:

Melophobia wrote:

the title has a terrible translation and obviously wrong. needs to be changed.
and wrong artist coincides too. Nakamura Masaki is the flutist so i think it cannot be artist.

Artist: Ranko (ランコ)
Title: Yoru Naku Usagi wa Yume wo Miru (夜啼く兎は夢を見る)

Confirmed. Please fix this and I will rerank this. Score won't be deleted.

LoGo wrote:

Confirmed. Please fix this and I will rerank this. Score won't be deleted.
... i don't see this

Aqo wrote:

How did this get ranked with slider tick rate 1 !? this is unreadable... needs TR2

1. I'm not touching your style, not touching the overmap. Let it be. I'll only talk about readability or useless speedups.
2. 01:09:267 (1) - 01:11:667 (1) - Music has nothing special here. It doesn't get higher, faster or stronger. These speedups are just your imagination, the only thing they do is confusing. Remove the speed up here.
3. 01:15:567 (1,2) - Here the only excuse is finish sound. Yeah, this is something kinda special for the music, so the speedups can fit. But don't forget to fix the slider tick rate, it's the only thing that makes this readable.
   In general, I'd not suggest to use 2.0x speedups. It looks exactly the same as usual 1.0x, but is actually faster. This brings the biggest confusions into osu!, try to place 1.5x or 1.7x instead. But this is in general, your choice to use 2.0x here is fine.
4. 02:14:967 (1) - Well. Two similar sliders before, but twice faster... That is confusing. Slider ticks make it a bit better, but still... You should change this slider's shape. If this one is different from others, they will not confuse so much.
5. 02:46:617 (2) - Placing this one at the same distance as previous two is a bad idea too, it looks too similar to previous rhythm. Make it closer for better readability: http://osu.ppy.sh/ss/584050
6. 02:59:817 (2,3) - I'd make something similar here too: http://osu.ppy.sh/ss/584052
7. 03:32:367 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - This part is the most intensive in the whole map. You really should reduce these jumps. It's too much. Edit: go check Aqo's post below, he provides a nice idea of a fitting fix.
8. 03:54:192 (1) - To make this slowdown more readable, I'd add a new combo to the circle (2) and would make them closer to each other. This reduces the change in speeds to something more lenient. http://puu.sh/1SF6j

1. 00:47:767 (8,9,1) - This 1/3 is unreadable. Different snapping is always unreadable if not shown directly by obvious rhythm consistencies or sliders. We have never seen before that this song has some 1/3s, so it's impossible to predict. Just replace 1/3s with sliders, it will make it clear. I'd make it like that: http://osu.ppy.sh/ss/584068
2. 02:01:467 (2,3,4,5) - This rhythm is actually very hard to read. The anti-jump under the slider is quite bad and meh. Just redo this part without stacking that all under the slider.
3. 02:02:442 (7) - This way of placing the repeating slider is bad. Here you start a slider from a blue point, but it's offbeat and fits the rhythm poorly. It's better to place a circle there, but starting repeating slider from the next line, white or red tick: http://osu.ppy.sh/ss/584081
4. 03:07:017 (4,5,1) - This is unreadable. 4-5 and 5-1 positions are exactly the same, but the rhythm is totally different. I suggest you to stack (1) under (5) and (2) under (4).
5. 03:14:067 (7,8,9) - Again, that's quite hard to read due to lack of 1/3s and huge amount of 1/4s. Just replace this by a slider.

grumd wrote:

First of all, set a Slider Tick Rate 2. sure sir.~

Lunatic

1. 00:47:767 (8,9,1) - This 1/3 is unreadable. Different snapping is always unreadable if not shown directly by obvious rhythm consistencies or sliders. We have never seen before that this song has some 1/3s, so it's impossible to predict. Just replace 1/3s with sliders, it will make it clear. I'd make it like that: http://osu.ppy.sh/ss/584068 yea, i tried, but i feel that plays wired so i changed (8,9) to 1/3 slider and i think they are fine to read now.
2. 02:01:467 (2,3,4,5) - This rhythm is actually very hard to read. The anti-jump under the slider is quite bad and meh. Just redo this part without stacking that all under the slider. okay, i moved (5) to cover with the previous combo (7)'s start.
3. 02:02:442 (7) - This way of placing the repeating slider is bad. Here you start a slider from a blue point, but it's offbeat and fits the rhythm poorly. It's better to place a circle there, but starting repeating slider from the next line, white or red tick: http://osu.ppy.sh/ss/584081 thanks for advice, changed.
4. 03:07:017 (4,5,1) - This is unreadable. 4-5 and 5-1 positions are exactly the same, but the rhythm is totally different. I suggest you to stack (1) under (5) and (2) under (4). ...okay
5. 03:14:067 (7,8,9) - Again, that's quite hard to read due to lack of 1/3s and huge amount of 1/4s. Just replace this by a slider. done.

tutuhaha wrote:

大草莓你怎么大草莓你还好么大草莓你要振作啊起来起来PiaPiaPIA!(ｏ ｀-′)ノ”(ノ﹏<。)

grumd wrote:

First of all, set a Slider Tick Rate 2.

BakaNA

1. I'm not touching your style, not touching the overmap. Let it be. I'll only talk about readability or useless speedups.
2. 01:09:267 (1) - 01:11:667 (1) - Music has nothing special here. It doesn't get higher, faster or stronger. These speedups are just your imagination, the only thing they do is confusing. Remove the speed up here.
   ★ changed TR to 2,for the much more fluency jump,it's my style ;3
3. 01:15:567 (1,2) - Here the only excuse is finish sound. Yeah, this is something kinda special for the music, so the speedups can fit. But don't forget to fix the slider tick rate, it's the only thing that makes this readable.
   In general, I'd not suggest to use 2.0x speedups. It looks exactly the same as usual 1.0x, but is actually faster. This brings the biggest confusions into osu!, try to place 1.5x or 1.7x instead. But this is in general, your choice to use 2.0x here is fine.
   ★ the slider is accelerated on the previous pattern,so i want to keep consistency with them :3
4. 02:14:967 (1) - Well. Two similar sliders before, but twice faster... That is confusing. Slider ticks make it a bit better, but still... You should change this slider's shape. If this one is different from others, they will not confuse so much.
   ★ but there already has slider tick >_<
5. 02:46:617 (2) - Placing this one at the same distance as previous two is a bad idea too, it looks too similar to previous rhythm. Make it closer for better readability: http://osu.ppy.sh/ss/584050
   ★ OK fixed :33
6. 02:59:817 (2,3) - I'd make something similar here too: http://osu.ppy.sh/ss/584052
   ★ i think the current pattern is fine ;w;
7. 03:32:367 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - This part is the most intensive in the whole map. You really should reduce these jumps. It's too much. Edit: go check Aqo's post below, he provides a nice idea of a fitting fix.
   ★ change to my style lol
8. 03:54:192 (1) - To make this slowdown more readable, I'd add a new combo to the circle (2) and would make them closer to each other. This reduces the change in speeds to something more lenient. http://puu.sh/1SF6j
   ★ OK fixed ;D

Amamiya Yuko wrote:

xsk

Amamiya Yuko wrote:

xsk

Taiko Guidelines wrote:

Custom Hitsound Volume
Keep volume at a constant level (e.g. 80%) with the beat still somewhat audible. Use the "Normal" audio sample set.