I see you've ignored the most important part.
I'll give you a hint, it's the bolded half sentence in the second unquoted paragraph.
I'll give you a hint, it's the bolded half sentence in the second unquoted paragraph.
I could almost say the same.Echo wrote:
I'll give you a hint, it's the bolded half sentence in the second unquoted paragraph.
You be the judge.Echo wrote:
Whereas I've conjured up a single sentence with enough evidence to send you to kingdom come, none of which you've satisfactorily defended against, you've brought none of my posts against me.
EDIT:strager wrote:
True until proven false is your word?
Well you're not getting it.Echo wrote:
I would like you to do two things:
- refute my 3 points in the linked post
- attack me with my posts
You hope I'm not joking? That means you are mafia? :<strager wrote:
I hope not?Derekku Chan wrote:
jk
If you want to take one for the team, why don't you do it now?Echo wrote:
@derekku: then lynch strager today and me tomorrow. It's not like you can lynch two people on the same day. If we're both mafia, it won't make a difference. I don't mind dying, if it'll help townies win. It's a team game after all.
What are you citing to come to this 'conclusion' exactly?Echo wrote:
@strager: then tell me why anyone should be listening to you.
Funny, that's exactly what someone who is in the mafia would saystrager wrote:
I am not a Mafia.Derekku Chan wrote:
That means you are mafia? :<
any response to this?0_o wrote:
Why not? Humans come up with "evidence" against other humans to lynch them, the only difference is that the mafia actually knows that they are lynching a human.Echo wrote:
That is exactly what I'm saying. There should be no evidence in posts against townies, which means mafia won't be able to bring up a valid reason to lynch a townie.0_o wrote:
So.. you are saying that the mafia is incapable of coming up with a valid reason to lynch someone?
Echo brings up good points. :/Echo wrote:
You're refusing to defend yourself against my evidence, and you're refusing to bring any evidence against me, yet you claim you are townie and I am mafia?
I think the simple answer is that there is no evidence you can use to defend yourself, and there is no evidence you can bring against me. Which means you are mafia, and I am townie.
I think you're mistaken.Echo wrote:
Townies will be able to convincingly bring evidence to show that the evidence used against them is misguided.
You're not defending yourself good enough. If you do it right, people will believe you. =)strager wrote:
That doesn't explain this at all:Echo wrote:
You're refusing to defend yourself against my evidence, and you're refusing to bring any evidence against me, yet you claim you are townie and I am mafia?
I think the simple answer is that there is no evidence you can use to defend yourself, and there is no evidence you can bring against me. Which means you are mafia, and I am townie.which is what I asked about.Echo wrote:
@strager: then tell me why anyone should be listening to you.
You're saying even if I defend myself I shouldn't be believed, and even if I attack you I shouldn't be believed?
But it's so fun.Echo wrote:
Stop twisting my words.
I'm sure a Mafia can convincingly defend themself too, smart one.Echo wrote:
I'm saying if you can't defend yourself, then there is no reason why anyone should believe what you say. If you can defend yourself, then that proves you're not mafia, and what you say holds legitimate value.
And this logic has gotten you how far in Mafia games?Echo wrote:
- Assume what everyone is saying is true
- Find evidence to show that a person is likely lying. From this point on assume everything he says is false.
- That person defends himself.
- Given that the person does so convincingly, assume from this point on everything he says is true. Otherwise, he is likely mafia and should be lynched.
Good to see you know you're not doing a very good job of it.strager wrote:
I'm sure a Mafia can convincingly defend themself too, smart one.Echo wrote:
I'm saying if you can't defend yourself, then there is no reason why anyone should believe what you say. If you can defend yourself, then that proves you're not mafia, and what you say holds legitimate value.
page 26 so far, I believestrager wrote:
And this logic has gotten you how far in Mafia games?Echo wrote:
- Assume what everyone is saying is true
- Find evidence to show that a person is likely lying. From this point on assume everything he says is false.
- That person defends himself.
- Given that the person does so convincingly, assume from this point on everything he says is true. Otherwise, he is likely mafia and should be lynched.
And this logic has gotten you how far in Mafia games?His logic does get him killed quickly in mafia games, but it's usually because the assassins are scared of him
Please remember me IIRCnardi11011 wrote:
QFTEcho wrote:
よろしくおねがいしま~す
like i know what it means
Are you trying to be punny?nardi11011 wrote:
Anyway, I'm keeping my vote on strager as he just seems to be acting too strange to me.
Again, claiming Doctor was a mistake. I didn't mean to "risk dying" by doing it because I didn't mean to do it.nardi11011 wrote:
Especially his very first slip-up doesn't seem to fit in with the rest of his posts, as I don't see why someone would rather risk dying the first night than lie about their role.
Could you explain farther what you mean by "fit in with the rest of his posts"? Also, are you going to be more active, or are we going to see you once every three days?nardi11011 wrote:
Holy shit, 6 pages? I hate timezones. Anyway, I'm keeping my vote on strager as he just seems to be acting too strange to me. Especially his very first slip-up doesn't seem to fit in with the rest of his posts, as I don't see why someone would rather risk dying the first night than lie about their role. I don't see anyone else as overly suspicious, so I'm not changing my vote.
also,QFTEcho wrote:
よろしくおねがいしま~す
like i know what it means
I'm indifferent on whether we lynch nardi or adam, and nardi hasn't said anything that would convince me to change my vote, so for now, my vote stands.BagelBob wrote:
0_o, who are you voting for right now? That last one was only 80% there.
BagelBob was referring to this:0_o wrote:
I'm indifferent on whether we lynch nardi or adam, and nardi hasn't said anything that would convince me to change my vote, so for now, my vote stands.BagelBob wrote:
0_o, who are you voting for right now? That last one was only 80% there.
Please state CLEARLY who you are voting for.0_o wrote:
Funny, that's exactly what someone who is in the mafia would saystrager wrote:
I am not a Mafia.Derekku Chan wrote:
That means you are mafia? :<
vote stra-
lol
I'm not confident enough to vote Echo and I believe SFG is a townie. So I'm fine with either nardi or adam, and since nardi is already on L-2, then well, there you go. I'm not going to split the vote between 2 people who I think should be lynched.0_o wrote:
EDIT: and if you think about it, his theory on strager's bandwagon (Echo, SFG, adam, nardi) does make some sense. Wouldn't you think a mafia member would jump at the chance to lynch the potential doctor? I think it's very likely that both of the mafia members are in that group.
Which actions/posts make you believe that Echo and SFG are townies?0_o wrote:
That vote for you was a joke, I obviously wouldn't defend you this whole time, then vote for you because you said you weren't mafia
And I'm voting for him because as I've already saidI'm not confident enough to vote Echo and I believe SFG is a townie. So I'm fine with either nardi or adam, and since nardi is already on L-2, then well, there you go. I'm not going to split the vote between 2 people who I think should be lynched.0_o wrote:
EDIT: and if you think about it, his theory on strager's bandwagon (Echo, SFG, adam, nardi) does make some sense. Wouldn't you think a mafia member would jump at the chance to lynch the potential doctor? I think it's very likely that both of the mafia members are in that group.