Welcome to Korea

Added

also move it to 1/8 as it's currently wrongly snapped

yep 1/8 here is right fixed.
(How it comes this song mixing 1/8 and 3/16 stuffs hooooooow)

I will keep the idea of introducing flute here due to #3676628. This is already higher difficulty and if these flute are not intorduced I think it can't represent any obvious difficulty changes during the five diffs.
snap thing plz check #3689811 and #3655462

I nerfed it by what I want long before but hey I don't think this is edged

Yep this part was weak before.
I don't like the idea to put 1/4 sliders in between evenly since I only introduced 1/4 tapdash at nearly end of beatmap but I'll change this into obvious wiggle.

Applied

yup

Yep agree with this, second part is on a different lower mood.
I think these two parts has same rythem support so that using 1/8 sliders itself on second part is fine, but yes it should be a different kind of pattern. Applied.

same for 00:20:511 (1,2,3,4) (but im assuming youre gonna change anyways due to #3690868

Applied
hmmmmmmmmm I really loved the idea of adding a dash to pass this part before, is that an unexpect thing for players?
Also for #3690868 I added a HDash in the middle since there is a regular drum.

hmm but 00:07:311 (1,2,3,4) is using 1/8 mainly on hitsound strengthen, 00:07:711 (1) do not have a lasting drum stream sound, it's already end here. And 1/8+1/1 reverse HDash is already a grand opening

did, also added one note similar at 00:21:806 (4)

00:11:306 (1) - Same here

00:30:506 (1) - Same here, is unnecesary

applied and applied lots of similar

Yep this indeed make map strengthen much better owo
TL;DR: First three changed to 1.9x dash and second three changed to 2.0x. Might a little edged but I think this represent well.

now after seeing the 2nd one 00:18:711 (5) - here i saw that you tried to follow the woop sound with those sliders where for 2nd one seems to be fine but for 1st i would do thing mentioned and reasoned above . You can remove the sliderend for the 2nd one too if you want but imo its optional

00:23:111 (3,4) - also would apply the 1st thing here

The reason to keep this slider is that this 3/4 slider is representing the 3/4 piano. the 3/4slider+1/4slider happens three times so I will keep HDash for consistency instead of inconsistency.

00:15:106 (5) - Same thing here

Changed and changed lots of similar 3/4 sliders. Some of them changed to 1/2 while most of them split into 1/2slider+3/4circle since 3/4 zither sound did exist and I want to express it.

00:16:711 (3,1) - same here

I'm lacking space ;w; I want to keep 00:13:711 (1,2) is the ctrl+H version of 00:12:911 (1,2). Due to HDash trigger distance I'm already at the edge of screen ;w;

he is right.

00:13:711 (1) 00:16:911 (1) - both should be hdashed considering all your previous and afterwards hdash emphasis choices 00:12:911 (1) - 00:11:911 (3) - 00:11:311 (1) - 00:10:911 (1) - 00:09:711 (1) - etc

having "no space" is not a valid reason to break this consistency, you simply have to adjust what gotta be adjusted in order to make it happen

Applied (rip my copypaste mirror)

00:27:311 (1) - same here

(asking for a detailed snap picture through discord)

This should be correct

gigas, i am sure this is not correct because the first slider genuinely sounds like 2/9 and it ends perfectly on that tick

After listening myself I tend to these snap following:

1. For the end of 1st slider, I think fayew is right, 1/4 or 3/8 will lead to a significant unmatch lag under 25% speed. So this is a 2/9.
2. For the 2nd tick that fayew suggest for a 1/12 (as 5/12 point in real), I personally don't believe composer would did such a complex snap in a BGM of a car racing vedio game so I relistened, mainly focsing on if first slider could be reversed as a second 2/9. But it turns out another 2/9 is clearly later. 5/12 seems fine under 50% yet under 25% it is slightly late.
   So...I tried a 2/5 and I think it matches, plz check this snap plan?
   

they are 1/5 except for the hihat? sound on 00:14:711

Yep seems 1/5s theory is much more reasonable, applying.

Decide to added a 1/4 between these 1/5 notes for not missing piano sounds and hitsounds. So here's the currently snap:

I had my doubts on this pattern too, beside the desicion on not using a reverse slider for 00:14:511 (4) - which I strongly suggest, I feel like 00:14:811 (6) - is just mapping the beginning of the sound which ocurrs strongly here 00:14:831 (7) - as appears on rocma's picture

The very annoying thing here is that this part is a combination of piano and zither. Piano sounds appearing a 1/2+1/4 as usual, while zithers turned out into a 1/5. Hitsounds still focusing on Piano stuff while zithers appears, leading to a 00:14:811 (4,5) 1/20 (how) small interval.
If I did decide to delete some note, I will delete 00:14:831 (5) but not 00:14:811 (4) since hitsounds strengthen should be appeared at 3/4 piano but not the 4/5 zither.

I've replayed countless times to try and hear 00:14:811 (4) - but the only sound I can hear is the sound that started on 00:14:671 (2) - . the sound on 00:14:831 (5) - even though it may feel as a double because it's basically a low+note, you've mapped this sound before here 00:14:311 (3) - as a single note.

yep...00:14:831 (4) - is too strong that it is overloading the existence of 00:14:811 (3). I decide to delete note on 00:14:811 and move its hitsound to 00:14:831 (4).
Still, the most reason I hestitate about this is that this will lead to a 1/20 time interval and I think this can't be ignored. Free to reopen if you (or others) have greater plan to combine piano and zither together.

Deleted 00:14:811 stuff, now snap is Rocma's suggestion (Also applied in Rain diff).
Also did change first three note into a reverse slider in Overdose diff.

00:14:811 (3) - this one is still wrongly snapped and sound way too late , imo right now its just 1/4

00:14:831 (3) - <- meant this one , previous one i mentioned was after changing in editor and checking the snap + cant edit the previous message so im leaving this here

00:27:611 (3) - same here

Keep due to the reason of #3666579/9863875.
As mentioned before it is really tricky to judge here since piano start at 3/4 while zither start at 4/5. Now I think Zither sound is strongger so I keep 4/5. Lower diff which didn't introduce 1/5 snap here is using 1/4.

holy, this long wall of discussion about snap :o
current snap sounds okay to me but only for 00:14:591 - is not imo
its too early, i believe that zither isnt even equal for 1/5 triplet
as fayew said and your confirmation, it should be 2/9 and the third object is 1/5
![https://marinska.s-ul.eu/Aepb398P]

would like to hear timing specialize for confirmation for sure

cackle

I tend to keep it 1/5 since I simply don't believe composer would do such complex snap for only once or twice in music. This is just a game bgm and I think composer won't do so much.
1/5 and 2/9 had only 1/45 difference which is reasonable for lots of modders having different opinions. Maybe it's in fact an issue on offset plz check #3689946

and it's 

Applied.
Have to mention that after appling the gap between 00:16:711 (3,1) becomes small so I moved 00:16:911 (1,2) a little. Yet still not very satisfied but acceptable for me.

This is much more reasonable than #3633948 so I'll undo this. Fixed (also on Rain diff)

Already did

A strange thing is that I played this naturally...And I analyzed the reason, thinking it deserves a keep:
So 00:19:711 (3) is a HDash, I hold left and dash to reach 00:19:911 (4). During this time, 00:20:111 (1,2,3,4) are already in the screen so I‘m subconsciously preparing for it. When I reached 00:19:911 (4). I released dash key but hold left key still, and the distance between 00:19:911 (4,1) made me reach 00:20:111 (1) perfectly. Also the time interval of 00:19:911 (4,1) is 1/2, enough for light overdose player to spare. That's why I think this is fine and tend to keep.
I think the shape is awkward though so I modded it as #3637900

Nope, I thnk wiggle here is very comforting for expressing music flow. and it's not that hard to handle.
Related mod: #3637901

I changed distance of 00:20:211 (2) as 1.3x and 00:20:411 (4) 1.4x to give some slight visual differences. But yes, the design before is awkward.

Yep Mniam mentioned this too
Nerfed distance of 00:20:406 (4,1) and make 00:20:706 (3) a stand reverse slider. Still HDash hope this is not that tence

Keep. This is mirrored version of 00:07:311 (1,2,3,4) and I think players tend to added a dash when first seeing this. I myself cannot play this walkable but adding a dash at anytime I could deal all of these so I tend to keep this design I like.

?
I didn't here any flute tune change at 00:23:311, just a drum which I ignored for pattern consistency. I followed background zither here.

In fact what emphasized here is zither. Zither sonuds appears every 1/1 just like what they appeared from 00:16:111 (1,2,1,2) for example and this four sliders still emphasizing zither sounds. I'm ignoring the flute for a long time until 00:30:511.
However due to #3666617 I'm considering changing this too. Will claim changing or keeping this pattern later.

Decide to splite sliders to add notes representing piano for #3666617 but keep the main pattern though.

Done as a part of #3689840 !

Keep since current is fine for build-up reason. well your suggestion is acceptable tho I am not a fan to spilit a whole flute here

Rorate for about 15° and added some little distance on 00:32:711 (7,8) owo

I'm following long flute here so I decied to not add left-rights

Streams in the 2nd kiai could work as I hear sounds that could support the streams so it is fine.

After hearing background I think you are right on background tunes. What I heard is during the 1st kiai, these parts mentioned are three 1/4, missing the forth 1/4 (except 00:43:211, I could catch this 1/4 tick).
But on the other hand, I think it's proper to slightly overmap all 1/4 here for the reason of keeping pattern consistency and some hitsound strengthen.
I'd like to keep these pattern unchanged but leave this open since I also needs more opinions on this.

i agree with gigas, these (00:35:711 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - aswell as other streams) streams currently emphasize nothing and are mapped to nothing aswell, i'd change the rhythm choice to something simpler

Yep after two modders' opinion I decided to simplfy these rhythm as what I mentioned in #3655467/9813169 and I think this now should be able to resloved. Free to reopen if modders think this is still not enough.

Tend to keep due to following reason:

1. due to #3693685, 00:44:706 (4,1) gap is bigger and should be bigger than 00:44:506 (3,4), setting a limit for 00:44:106 (1,2). Under this case thesentwo sliders are almost on their smallest HDash trigger distance.
2. 00:44:506 (3) is a more important tune than 00:44:106 (1,2) which means it need more emphasize, so that 00:44:306 (2,3) should be bigger than 00:44:106 (1,2).

Kept main pattern idea but changed (4,1) spacing bigger than (3,4)

nerfed to 2.55x 'cause I want them still look obviously stronger than 00:34:711 (1,2,3).

Related mod: #3655467
keep since background synth sound could support stream

yep

The 1st kiai is intended right-left desighed only. wiggle like this is designed only appearing in 2nd kiai so that the difficulty will grow harder.
Did some little movement added in same pattern of 2nd kiai. I also think 00:52:111 (3) is a kind of punchline but seems no more space for me to added an exactly same wiggle :(

Added a 1.15x speed multiplier.

buffed a little

Yep applied


Yep applied owo
I liked former design but this is better owo

agree

oops some renaments of former mod

buffed a little