mapped by virtuoso
submitted
last updated
Hype Train31 / 5
Nomination Status0 / 2
Disqualified by NeKroMan4ik with new problem #3002442 (
Hi, this is a veto. Iceluin and I don't think this map should proceed in ranking any further in its …
).
New Discussion
Please sign in to post or reply
Discussions
Sort by

01:04:226 (1,2,3) - spacing for these feel a bit small here coupled with the slider leniency. Its feels the same as 00:53:847 (1,2,3) - found in the repeat in a less intense section.

Would suggest spacing it similarly to 01:01:631 (1,2,3).

permalink

done

permalink
Marked as resolved by virtuoso

01:47:684 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,1) - spacing for these could be buffed a bit, similarly to how you did it in the former repeat at 00:47:361 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,1). At give them a bit more spacing compared to your section at 01:39:900.

permalink

done

permalink
Marked as resolved by virtuoso

02:25:954 (3) - drums kinda pop of so it would be nice to make this active with 2 circles instead rather than use the same rhythm as 02:25:306 (1,2) - that are following vocals.

permalink

okay

permalink
Marked as resolved by virtuoso

03:26:603 (3,4,5,6,7,1,2,3,4,5,6,1,2,3) - why are all these practically distance spaced LMAO. You're already stacking a lot of these notes and decreasing the intensity of these so try not to be scared of adding a bit spacing to these.

Same thing with 03:31:468 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1) - where spacing could be a teeny bit bigger to reflect the intensity here

permalink

03:26:603 - increased spacing mostly on claps but overall too

03:31:468 - increased spacing slightly

permalink
Marked as resolved by virtuoso

03:49:630 - don't really get the SV changes here in this section. You've done patterning in groupings of 4 with 03:49:630 (1,2,3,4) - 03:50:927 (1,2,3,4) - etc but you do SV changes after groupings of 2 and 4 respectively at 03:50:279 - 03:51:576 - which seems really incoherent with your idea.

So instead, I think it would be better alongside your increasing spacing idea to have SV changes every groupings of 4 at 03:50:927 - 03:52:225 - 03:53:522.

permalink

Already mentioned in the veto post but overall spacing could be nerfed for this section since it's not really that intense. Would also give contrast to the next section at 03:54:819 - where the song does get intense.

permalink

put sv changes on provided timestamps and nerfed overall spacing for this section, ty

permalink
Marked as resolved by virtuoso

04:49:306 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - surely you can buff the spacing for the peak of the guitars here? At least do similar spacing to the previous jumps you did at 04:48:333 (1,2,1,2,3). The patterning is enough to differentiate these both and the extra spacing will be cool to emphasise the peak.

permalink

yeah

permalink
Marked as resolved by virtuoso
/