hey your question did not imply that it always has to be sacrificing one's pleasure, leaving it open to "sometimes".Saturnalize wrote:
it may involve more than one person
that aside,
forum
How do I feel excitement?
posted
Total Posts
74
yet that's so subjective not everyone will ever agree on a particular caseabraker wrote:
justiceSaturnalize wrote:
name one thing that satisfies all people's pleasure by sacrificing one's
i think everyone can agree that me doing a flip off of the building was really cool and satisfyingxxjesus1412fanx wrote:
yet that's so subjective not everyone will ever agree on a particular case
ok how about distributing all wealth from the richest lonely person?xxjesus1412fanx wrote:
yet that's so subjective not everyone will ever agree on a particular caseabraker wrote:
justice
citremi wrote:
xxjesus1412fanx wrote:
yet that's so subjective not everyone will ever agree on a particular case
i think everyone can agree that me doing a flip off of the building was really cool and satisfying
if you landed on your feet that whould be pretty cool
oh right a valid point my badabraker wrote:
hey your question did not imply that it always has to be sacrificing one's pleasure, leaving it open to "sometimes".Saturnalize wrote:
it may involve more than one person
that aside,
Lots of people would not be happy about that.abraker wrote:
ok how about distributing all wealth from the richest lonely person?
elaboratexxjesus1412fanx wrote:
Lots of people would not be happy about that.abraker wrote:
ok how about distributing all wealth from the richest lonely person?
Topic Starter
Can you guys like stop?
the upper classes?abraker wrote:
elaboratexxjesus1412fanx wrote:
Lots of people would not be happy about that.
Ok it's impossible to do so. If you take the intersection of all sets, where each set contains elements representing one person's possible satisfactions, and exclude one person, the set is empty.
and who is this person we're excluding? If this person is the one who tributes everyone else's satisfaction, shouldn't the satisfaction is in the set that is not intersecting with any set?
anySaturnalize wrote:
and who is this person we're excluding?
What does this meant to mean?Saturnalize wrote:
If this person is the one who tributes everyone else's satisfaction, shouldn't the satisfaction is in the set that is not intersecting with any set?
"shouldn't the satisfaction be the set that is not intersecting with any set"
i don't know what it means either but there is clearly a miscommunication
abraker you are kind of responsible for this. all you had to say was "it's not possible to satisfy every single person's interests because there is no one thing that satisfies literally everyone"
bringing up set theory is kind of stupid and slightly extra imo
i don't know what it means either but there is clearly a miscommunication
abraker you are kind of responsible for this. all you had to say was "it's not possible to satisfy every single person's interests because there is no one thing that satisfies literally everyone"
bringing up set theory is kind of stupid and slightly extra imo
E m i
agreeeeeeedcitremi wrote:
"shouldn't the satisfaction be the set that is not intersecting with any set"
i don't know what it means either but there is clearly a miscommunication
abraker you are kind of responsible for this. all you had to say was "it's not possible to satisfy every single person's interests because there is no one thing that satisfies literally everyone"
bringing up set theory is kind of stupid and slightly extra imo
unnecessarily complicating things is the best way to prolong conversation and keep a thread goingcitremi wrote:
bringing up set theory is kind of stupid and slightly extra imo
I don't think I have a capability to comprehend but I'll tryabraker wrote:
anySaturnalize wrote:
and who is this person we're excluding?What does this meant to mean?Saturnalize wrote:
If this person is the one who tributes everyone else's satisfaction, shouldn't the satisfaction is in the set that is not intersecting with any set?
So we're assuming anyone can be excluded from the diagram, which means everyone possesses the same level of threat to get their satisfaction sacrificed?
Excluding one whole set from the intersection implies that every of this person's satisfaction is sacrificed. What I initially thought is this person's sacrificed satisfaction may or may not be in the intersection, meaning that not everyone possesses the feeling of content when achieving something that people generally feel satisfied. That being said, it is possible that the satisfaction in the set is not intersecting with any of the set, especially when considering all set into account.
ok what just I write I need to keep memeing
Let me just start this post by saying that silver is a chemical element with symbol Ag and atomic number 47. A soft, white, lustrous transition metal, it exhibits the highest electrical conductivity, thermal conductivity, and reflectivity of any metal. The metal is found in the Earth's crust in the pure, free elemental form ("native silver"), as an alloy with gold and other metals, and in minerals such as argentite and chlorargyrite. Most silver is produced as a byproduct of copper, gold, lead, and zinc refining.
But there's also the fact that the Arecaceae are a botanical family of perennial climbers, shrubs, acaules and trees commonly known as palm trees. They are flowering plants, a family in the monocot order Arecales. Currently 181 genera with around 2600 species are known, most of them restricted to tropical and subtropical climates. Most palms are distinguished by their large, compound, evergreen leaves, known as fronds, arranged at the top of an unbranched stem. However, palms exhibit an enormous diversity in physical characteristics and inhabit nearly every type of habitat within their range, from rainforests to deserts.
But there's also the fact that the Arecaceae are a botanical family of perennial climbers, shrubs, acaules and trees commonly known as palm trees. They are flowering plants, a family in the monocot order Arecales. Currently 181 genera with around 2600 species are known, most of them restricted to tropical and subtropical climates. Most palms are distinguished by their large, compound, evergreen leaves, known as fronds, arranged at the top of an unbranched stem. However, palms exhibit an enormous diversity in physical characteristics and inhabit nearly every type of habitat within their range, from rainforests to deserts.
Topic Starter
I can't comprehend a word you guys are saying
It is not only possible, but it very probable. Consider approximately 7 billion sets of satisfactions, each set containing maybe 100 satisfactions. If there are 1 million different possible satisfaction you can think of, the odds that the intersection of all of the sets would contain at least 1 of the 1 million satisfactions would be ridiculously small.Saturnalize wrote:
I don't think I have a capability to comprehend but I'll try
So we're assuming anyone can be excluded from the diagram, which means everyone possesses the same level of threat to get their satisfaction sacrificed?
Excluding one whole set from the intersection implies that every of this person's satisfaction is sacrificed. What I initially thought is this person's sacrificed satisfaction may or may not be in the intersection, meaning that not everyone possesses the feeling of content when achieving something that people generally feel satisfied. That being said, it is possible that the satisfaction in the set is not intersecting with any of the set, especially when considering all set into account.
I get an affirmation from abraker I'm drowning in tears from now on I'm Saturnalize, B.Scabraker wrote:
It is not only possible, but it very probable. Consider approximately 7 billion sets of satisfactions, each set containing maybe 100 satisfactions. If there are 1 million different possible satisfaction you can think of, the odds that the intersection of all of the sets would contain at least 1 of the 1 million satisfactions would be ridiculously small.Saturnalize wrote:
I don't think I have a capability to comprehend but I'll try
So we're assuming anyone can be excluded from the diagram, which means everyone possesses the same level of threat to get their satisfaction sacrificed?
Excluding one whole set from the intersection implies that every of this person's satisfaction is sacrificed. What I initially thought is this person's sacrificed satisfaction may or may not be in the intersection, meaning that not everyone possesses the feeling of content when achieving something that people generally feel satisfied. That being said, it is possible that the satisfaction in the set is not intersecting with any of the set, especially when considering all set into account.
I want this man exiled.
Ik this is like, 4 years later, but i kinda feel the same
i can relate
i can relate
you make a compelling argumentgoaway wrote:
im sorry dont ban me
sings the tune of "Hire this man"goaway wrote:
im sorry dont ban me
Oh mods please, ban this man
Oh mods please, ban this man
He's using this to necro, and posting with no sense!
this thread is a moodSitsumi wrote:
Ik this is like, 4 years later, but i kinda feel the same
i can relate
wrong threadgoaway wrote:
i hate this game
goaway wrote:
i hate this game
Forgiven. But there's no excuse to bump an old thread.goaway wrote:
im sorry dont ban me
why. not why you hate the game why did you necro?goaway wrote:
i hate this game
stop no
CEASE YOUR NECROMANTIC SHANANIGAINS AT ONCE
