1. Love Letter (2.15 stars, 458 notes)

Xinely|Nozhomi

Sonnyc Electoz

Modem wrote:

Oh my gosh, it's my favourite song!!!!

Good luck with thisヽ(*・ω・)ﾉ

[Colours]
Combo1 : 250,244,18
Combo2 : 5,152,239

Lasse wrote:

d

[general]
audio bitrate is too high as it exceeds 192kbit need help with this please
first combo color is kinda gross. using some light-ish blue instead would be really nice imo and go great with the eyes of the girl in the bg
maybe try

[Colours]
Combo1 : 250,244,18
Combo2 : 5,152,239

wooo, okay

03:55:718 (1) - 05:14:085 - I don't think using kiai for this song works that well. It's so calm, even at those spots. you could go for a short kiai flash (like 1/2 beat) or even no kiai at all imo. Having everything flash and all doesnt really fit the mood of the song It is calm, yes. But I still feels like it's okay for kiai at this part since ... this is the main part Xd

[map]
00:52:044 (6,1) - slider leniency makes the spacing here feel nearly non existent which doesnt really suit the downbeat, idk maybe sth like http://i.imgur.com/4pNTol7.jpg waaaa, yeah you right
00:59:391 (1) - there seems to a faint piano on the red tick, so shortening this to 1/2 would work well since also the strongest part of the vocal ends there welp, I was trying to yolo until you pointing this, changed anyway
01:18:167 (6,7,1) - curve-stright thing isnt that visually appealing, since it seems you dont want to overlap sth on the slider before you could at least try to make the shape of the 1/4 work better with the slider => http://i.imgur.com/LIEhJx0.jpg Good point
02:44:493 (2) - really sudden 1/4 jump, ctrlg would work nicer imo Hmmmmm, I like this one so I consider opinion for now
03:19:800 (1) - stacking this strong vocal + piano doesnt work at all and you never did it hehehehe Xd
03:39:391 (1,2) - would either overlap more or not at all since it looks quite bad with this slight touching I'll take the 2nd one
04:11:024 (6,7,1) - spacing makes this a bit hard to read since it they are nearly the same visual distance I hear ya
06:12:860 (1,1,1) - either silence the spinner(ends) or maybe set the like http://i.imgur.com/KM4OA2g.jpg so the ends are on audible beats. which works better imo i'll just.. silence it

gl thanks Xd

edit: lol I think I modded the wrong thing since your post in my queue was deleted and I didnt see you posted again so it took your only pending map >_> wahahahaha, It's okay!

Lasse wrote:

here's the mp3 reencoded to rankable 192bkit/s
http://puu.sh/oDJa4/0685266f9b.mp3
offset could be a little different

KaedekaShizuru wrote:

sorry, this song has no relationship with 麻枝　准, but Authors by 都乃河　勇人（Tonokawa Yuuto）and Compose by 折戸　伸治（Orito Shinji）
so you should del Maeda Jun and 麻枝 准 in the tags and add in 都乃河勇人、Tonokawa Yuuto、折戸伸治、Orito Shinji、Visual Art's
maybe mod this map soon...

KaedekaShizuru wrote:

[General]
First of all I must clarify: 麻枝准 is only the QC(the Quality Control) and one of the Composer/Lyricist for this game, not the author. He compose the BGM 「旅」(Tabi) and Lyrics it derived the song 「CANOE」 and 「渡りの詩」(Watari no Uta). That's all.
The authors of Rewrite are: 田中ロミオ(Tanaka Romeo)、竜騎士07(Ryukishi07) and 都乃河勇人.
The route of 中津静流(Nakatsu Shizuru) writen by 都乃河勇人, all of the script has no any relationship with 麻枝准.（The route of 此花ルチア(Konohana Lucia) writen by 竜騎士07, others by 田中ロミオ）
So you must del Maeda Jun and 麻枝 准 from the tags, although this not affect to rank, but please do not mislead other people. Key ≠ 麻枝准. Thank you.
https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rewrite_(ゲーム) Whoaaa, If you say that much then okay, I'll delete Jun Maeda from the tags. Thank you for your research!

What is the diff name "Ani" mean? It seems like Chinese Pinyin “爱你”, but this is a Japanese song, you can use Japanese-Romanise "Aishiteru", or use English "Love You", even the English of the title "Love Letter". I make this diff for someone named "Ani" and it's one of her favorite song that she love to sang. So yeah..

SV1.3 is OK, but you use many 1.2X, 1.5X green line. Those makes your slider too fast, made the flow hard, unsightly and not suitable for this song. This song is softly, your mapping should reflected it. 0.75X, 0.8X,1.0X,1.2X enough. Hmmmm, Is that so? It plays fine for me though :/

[Ani]
The first paragraph of this song has weak piano sound, you can follow these and I feel those are better to map. You know always following vocal is worse, but for this song, you can mix the vocal and rhythm where appropriate. Hooo, okay!
00:07:146 (1,2) - good symmetry, but 00:10:411 (1) looks very bad. there is no any sound at 00:11:228. if you have slow slider it's very proper to a normal slider like KPY have done. Many sliders in this map are all like this. good point
00:23:473 (1) - start this at 00:23:575 and end at 00:26:636, then add a circle at 00:23:473 hooo, good
In my opinion, I would add a slider from 00:30:003 to 00:30:820, a circle at 00:32:452, slider from 00:33:269 to 00:34:085, a big DS between 00:35:309 (4,5), maybe 2X, then slider from 00:36:534 to 00:37:350, circle at 00:38:167 and 00:38:983......I agree on the DS part but ummh, maybe I'll just consider your opinion on the rhythm thing, hehe. Also would be great if you able to provide any Picture about the rhythm you said
Do you have heard of Snake mapping? You are not mapping normal nor easy, but insane instead. Like 00:30:003 (2,3)、00:56:126 (1,2)、00:59:391 (1,2) and so on. Please do not fall in DS hole. Insane diff is free. Almost all of the notes likes snake, looks boring welp, I kinda agree with you, maybe I'll ask someone for this
01:15:309 (5) - do you heard any sound here? Yes, and it's very faint. Do you hear the weak piano sound thingy at here? Anyway I'm removing it for now for a better play
01:50:820 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - even for insane, this stream too hard and I recommend kickslider instead. Yes , Yes I see your point on here. But.. I feel like I want to streaaaaammm at here you know? cause the good part are going to start hehe. Oh well, If someone also asking me to do that maybe I'll consider it
02:32:452 (1) - stack on 02:33:677 (2) mmm, I'll give it a try
03:11:228 (3,4,5,6) - what are you following? I can't make clear them. You'd better use slider to cover these. I'm trying to follow the piano at here? Also I do think this also enjoyable. Xd
03:28:779 (4) - why not a slider here same as before? there are all of One-half shot, 03:29:187 (5) too, downbeat at 03:29:595 but you add the slider tail makes strange feeling. Downbeat should be circle or slider head to give player striking sense. eeeh? But it feels great to me ;;
03:30:411 (1,2,3) - then why you suddenly switch to vocal? hmm, maybe I'll give another pattern
03:32:044 (3) 、03:35:309 (4) - same with 03:29:187 (5)
So many issues, still need hard word.
I only give you direction, others can only rely on your own understanding.
Good luck.

@Karen
我知道是乃跑来deny的KD 给我还回来（怒

Modem wrote:

Hi~~~ M4M owo/

THIS SONG BREAKS MY KOKORO!
SO SAD! UWU *sobbing grossly*

General

* Please resize your BG into the rankable size. It could be 1024 x 768. You could ask Ringating to help you resizing the background. He is a very nice person :3 I've known him since a year ago, Anyway the current BG is ok and rankable.
* You should add soft-sliderslide 'cuz the noise coming from the soft default slider is disturbing the main music. Moreover, this is such a calm and quiet song in which the noise from the slider kinda broke the aesthetic side. And don't forget to change all the sample from the timing setup panel into S:C1 if you do this :3 asdsafsa, i forgot lol, thanks
* In my opinion, the preview point that you choose didn't hit the highlight from the song itself. Based on the way you choose the preview point, I guess you didn't intend to put the preview point at some part before the kiai time and instead you like to add calm yet touching part as a preview point am I right o3o? My suggestion is, if you really want to add calm and gorgeous part as the preview point, then you should move the preview point into 04:47:554 . That part is so nice and touchy ;w; *sniffle* I love you
* It would be nice if you make this part -> 01:51:636 (1) ~ 02:17:758 into kiai time since the rhythm around this part doesn't have any difference with the rhythm at 03:55:718 (1) ~ 04:21:840 (1) in which it was being kiai time, so it still makes sense to put kiai time at 01:51:636 (1) ~ 02:17:758 there
* Please disable the countdown at the 'design' from the song setup. The song starts quite early and the countdown wouldn't be used so it was unnecessary asdasfasfa
* Um, also, this is purely a suggestion, but I guess the combo colors that you chose doesn't fit well with the background. I'm afraid this will result in disqualification (I've already seen some maps which was disqualified only because the combo color that they were chosen didn't match with the background) so my suggestion is, replace your combo colors with :

[Colours]
Combo1 : 192,129,129
Combo2 : 142,211,253
Combo3 : 250,222,126
Combo4 : 255,225,225
Combo5 : 111,183,255

Um, sorry that I added some new combo colors in it but it matches with the boy's hair color, and their skin, so..... >////< greaat!

* Others are pretty fine~ >w</

Ani

* Why HP 6.6? HP 6 suits well with this calm song :3 yes
* Change AR to 7 7.3 cuz anti mainstreammmm
* Change OD to 7 as well so that it will balance with the HP and AR yes
* Um okay then, I'll start with the part around -> 00:03:065 (3) ~ 00:20:207 (1) since there are strong piano sound from the main music so that the hitsound around this part could be improved. Add whistle at :
- 00:03:065 (3)
- 00:07:147 (1)
- 00:09:595 (3)
- 00:12:045 (2)
- 00:12:861 (4)
- 00:13:677 (1)
- 00:15:309 (1)
- 00:16:943 (1)
- 00:19:392 (2)
- 00:20:207 (1) marry me
* 00:23:473 (1) Using 20% volume for this spinner at this calm part is still a little bit too loud. Lower down the volume at this spinner into 10% yes yes
* 00:55:037 ~ 00:55:445 - Just my suggestion, but there's lovely bell sound from the main music that could be mapped here. You could add a slider that started at 00:55:037 ~ 00:55:309 then add a note at 00:55:445. Add whistle at 00:55:309 afterwards :3. If you want to apply this suggestion, then change the Beat Snap Divisor into 1/6 first aa, well, I did map these part, but with my own rhythm. ty
* 01:50:003 (5) - Using whistle and finish at the same time on this note is too loud compared to the main music. Remove the finish and keep using whistle instead ayy
* 01:50:820 (1) ~ 01:51:432 (7) - The volume on this stream quite loud considering the piano from the main music is kinda low and there's no hitsound in this stream that could emphasize the piano. Plus, the soft hitsound is covering the piano from the main music too much. Lower down the volume at this stream into 10% so that it will blend with the piano from the main music properly lovely
* 01:51:636 (1) ~ 02:17:554 (5) - This part is lacking the hitsound while this part is one of the highlights from the music. I dunno if the hitsound for this kiai time is still WIP but if it doesn't then, I suggest you to add whistle at least at every big white tick (the downbeat) so that at least you follow along the piano :3 o shit I forgot to HS
* 02:05:718 (2) ~ 02:06:330 (5) - How about making the stream at these notes into round instead of letting it straight? It will lead the flow nicely considering the previous slider -> 02:04:697 (1) have the curvy angle from its slider's frame, so that it will be more comfortable to have a rounded flow afterwards. (Sorry that I couldn't take any screenshot as an example. F-12 in my laptop is broken uwu ;w;) I know what are you saying
* 02:11:228 (1) ~ 02:14:493 (1) - Um, why did the space between 02:11:228 (1) and 02:12:860 (2) is a lot larger than the space between 02:12:860 (2) and 02:14:493 (1) while they are exactly having the same gap? This is quite confusing and pretty noticeable, so my suggestion is, to move 02:11:228 (1) and 02:12:860 (2) closer to each other so that they will have a consistent spacing with 02:14:493 (1) there you go
* 02:17:350 (4,5) - Blanket these notes with 02:16:126 (3) ? They will look cute owo you are cute
* 02:17:758 - The piano from the main music is quite strong here. It would be nice if you add a note + whistle here then stack this note along with 02:17:350 (4,5) yes
* 02:27:146 (1) - Lower down the volume at this spinner into 10% so that it will blend perfectly with the piano yse
* 02:38:983 - Please add a note + whistle at this part to follow the piano. It feels weird to skip the piano here since it sounds quite strong and need to be emphasized :3. Moreover, you map this part -> 02:39:800 (5) in which was emphasizing the piano, so it would be nice if you map this part -> 02:38:983 as well to keep the consistency among the rhythm srue
* 02:41:840 (3,4) - Are you sure you don't wanna making them into blanket? o.o a
* 02:46:738 - Add a note at this part please~ It would be nice if you follow the backing vocal as well~ MARRY ME
* 02:49:595 (5) - Add whistle at this note, since you consistently adding whistle at 02:47:146 (1) , 02:47:963 (2) , and 02:48:779 (3) which means you're mapping the vocal here yes
* 03:04:902 (3) - Add whistle at this note to emphasize the piano sye
* 03:12:860 - Add a note at this part to follow the backing vocal :3 hmm, naah I think the current one feels better.
* 03:20:616 (3) - Add whistle at this note to emphasize her voice yanaginagi
* 03:21:024 (4,5) - Fix this blanket please~ This slider -> 03:21:432 (5) needs to be more curvy sexy
* 03:23:065 (1) - Add whistle at this note to emphasize the piano yes
* 03:30:411 (1) - Add whistle at the head of this slider please~ yes
* 03:31:024 (2) - Add whistle at the head of this slider as well~ ya
* 03:50:207 (1) - Lower down the volume at this spinner into 10% so that it will blend perfectly with her moe voice yanaginagi
* 03:54:901 (1) - The hitsound at this note could be improved. First, you need to lower down the volume for this note into 10%, then add clap in drum additions. It will emphasizes the drum from the main music perfectly <3 whoaa
* 03:55:718 (1) ~ 04:21:840 (1) - Same suggestion for this kiai time part. Please add whistle at every big white tick (the downbeat) to improve the hitsound sure
* 04:15:310 (1,2) - Same suggestion as before, please move them a bit closer to each other so that the spacing would be consistent with the next slider -> 04:18:575 (1) alright
* 04:45:718 (1) - Lower down the volume at this spinner into 10% so that it will blend perfectly with the violin, then add whistle at the spinner to emphasize the piano at 04:47:962 yes
* 05:13:269 (2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - Same as before. Lower down the volume around this part to emphasize the piano nicely
* 05:14:085 (1) ~ 05:40:207 (4) - Same suggestion for this kiai time part. Please add whistle at every big white tick (the downbeat) to improve the hitsound ;)
* 05:26:534 - Please add a note at this part since there's a high pitched piano from the main music that was skipped at this part alright
* 05:39:391 (4) - Move this slider a bit further from the previous note -> 05:38:575 (3) so that it will has a consistent spacing with 05:36:942 (1,2) since their gap were the same aaaaaa
* 05:40:411 (1) - Lower down the volume at this spinner into 10% so that it will blend perfectly with the violin ok
* Add whistle at :
- 05:52:452 (3)
- 05:58:983 (3)
- 06:01:432 (2)
- 06:02:248 (4)
- 06:03:064 (1)
- 06:06:330 (1)
- 06:08:779 (2)
- 06:09:595 (1)
* 06:12:860 (1) - Lower down the volume at this spinner into 10% so that it will blend perfectly with the violin
* 06:14:493 (1) - ^
* 06:16:126 (1) - ^^ added all and love you

Okay then, that's all~
Beautiful song >.<
Btw, dat bg makes an extra effect to my broken kokoro ;A; (nice choice <3)
My map, in case you forgot the link : https://osu.ppy.sh/s/453879

Good Luck in Rank Shurelia~ />w</

CrystilonZ wrote:

From your queue~

[General]
Offset is pretty late. I cannot say exactly how much tho. 595 maybe? fixed into 582

[Ani]
00:43:865 (2,3,4,5,6) - I don't know how I should put this... urr... make them a W shape rather than M shape. 00:43:865 (2,3) - The flow between these two should be better if done so alright then
01:00:804 (3,4,5) - are you sure about the spacing? There's nothing to cue the anti jump orz alright, I'll stack 4 with 5 then
01:11:620 (4) - try moving this to 411/137 to improve the coherence with 01:09:171 (1,2) - whoaaa yes
01:36:518 (2) - idk if this is intentional or not, but the spacing is not equal between this and 01:35:293 (1,3) -. If you're trying to accelerate things here to fit with the music, move 01:38:151 (4) - further apart oh damn , lol
01:42:640 (2) - the slider-whistle sound is pretty out of place. Might be accidental it is? It's sounds ok tho
02:07:946 (1,2,3,4,5) - I'm not a fan of this orz, but if you want to do this, could you please make them flow nicely? move 02:08:967 (2) - to 57/99 aaaaaa, thanks
02:58:967 (4) - overmapping here doesn't fit naah, there's a quite clear bell's sounds at here
03:03:456 (1,2,3) - DS sd
03:11:212 (3,4,5,6) - I'm pretty sure that this happens because you ran out of space while you were mapping lol xd , there

this should be better

03:28:763 (4,5,6) - I'd rather you didn't decrease the spacing here. Doing so provides better consistency and fits better with the music yes
04:30:804 (4) - and I'm pretty sure that this also happens because of you ran out of space lol. Move the whole 04:28:355 (1,2,3) - downwards and continue the pattern. lmao, thanks
01:50:804 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,1) - A lot of people will get 50 because of that spacing. Something like 05:13:865 (8,1) - is much more preferable alright
05:27:130 (1) - A simple old stacking will do. No need to reverse, it just make the map more messy orz yes
05:31:416 (2,3,4,5) - 447/95 because of the same reason yse
05:43:457 (1,2,1,2,1,2) - uhh... You shouldn't space them randomly like that. Space it according to the timeline. You could even make some pattern from these notes suggestions pls pls

good luck~

LigerZero wrote:

Boleh ikut modding....? Malam sampai sahur palingan aku ngemodding via PM chat FBmu....

Down wrote:

[Ani]
■ 00:23:439 - Add a circle here, then spinner start at 00:23:847 sure
■ 00:29:561 (1) - I think it need a NC, because here is incomplete bar. alright
■ 00:55:684 - How do you think about adding a circle? The vocal sound exist here, and also you followed 00:29:561 - here there
■ 01:50:786 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - This pattern is kinda too hard for this diff, consider make it easier. hmm, to be honest I like this one, so umm, I'll keep it for now. What app that you use for checking this lol

Very hard..

■ 01:58:133 - It need a clickable that strong sound and emphasize place, consider reduce the slider length and add a circle here. alright
■ 02:44:459 (2) - It must be Ctrl+G here, can be really confusing a rhythm. okayy
■ 03:32:826 - Same as 01:58:133 - sure
■ 04:02:214 - ^ It is very important for playability of map. hai hai
■ 05:44:663 (1,1) - I don't think this NC is anything necessary, please remove it to avoid misleading. Instead, add here 05:45:071 (2) okayy

This song is really great! I am hopeful of your success for rank.
Good luck!

Trynna wrote:

just a quick check, don't need kds if you don't want to

hp and od seems too damn high considering a calm song, srsly, consider decrease it by 1 at least reduced the hp to 5.5 while no change for the OD

00:55:003 (1) - I'm almost sure that this slider should start in 00:55:071 - naah, you can try to hear it with your earphone that there's a faint sound at there
01:50:786 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - I'm doubtful about this 1/8 spam for this map being a 2 stars (lol) and a calm song (almost constantly 1/2 ofc), think about the novice players who could apreciate your set too. I think this "stream" should be removed and replaced by sliders probably I'm gonna considering this but there's someone that made 1/8 on low bpm too so..
05:13:337 (3,4,5,6,7,8) - same thing tbh same

Trynna wrote:

00:55:003 (1) - I'm almost sure that this slider should start in 00:55:071 - naah, you can try to hear it with your earphone that there's a faint sound at there please, use playback rate 25% you'll understand what I'm saying...

Trynna wrote:

Trynna wrote:

00:55:003 (1) - I'm almost sure that this slider should start in 00:55:071 - naah, you can try to hear it with your earphone that there's a faint sound at there please, use playback rate 25% you'll understand what I'm saying...

Hobbes2 wrote:

Hey, here's my end of the m4m.

00:43:847 (2,3) - this spacing is so short but 3 is such a powerful vocal, would be nice to increase the spacing some to give it some emphasis ah yess

00:55:003 (1) - sounds like this is supposed to start on the blue tick? (00:55:071) yes

00:57:724 (3,4,5,6) - clean up this pattern by making the a parallelogram out of this, so make 5/6 a copy paste of 3/4 and move it there

01:40:173 (3,4,5,6) - is nicer if 01:40:582 (4,5,6) - form the perfect triangle instead of 01:40:173 (3,4,5), because 4/5/6 have the piano sound, so patterning those 3 together makes more sense.

01:53:643 (4) - looks like this blanket needs work - https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/5527236 (curve doesnt match the approach circle) there you go

01:49:969 (5,1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - I have to disagree with using a stream in this map. Otherwise, it's a nice and calm map that has very simple rhythm. Suddenly, there's a stream? And the song doesn't even have any more complex rhythm in the kiai. Just use a reverse slider instead. alright since many people complaint about this, I give up.

02:16:092 (3,4,5) - blanket needs work! approach circle not lined up - https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/5527240 okayy

02:17:724 (6) - new combo? ah yess

03:39:969 (2) - this distance is inexplicably larger than the rest of your 1/4 spacing yeah

05:13:337 (3,4,5,6,7,8) - as before, disagree with streams in this map. also, it sounds like the music here isn't 1/8 rhythm anyway so this feels weird to play. yes

05:18:541 (3) - give the slider more rotational symmetry? now the curve on the left is way bigger than the curve on the right and it makes the slider lopsided I'm bad at making spaghetti . . .

05:18:541 (3,4) - On the same as above, you can blanket these two for a nice visual yes

05:31:398 (2,3,4) - if these are just going down vertically, it would be nice to get the spacing between them perfectly the same naah, people won't notice the 0.1x difference haha

Good luck! nice song.

05:18:541 (3) - give the slider more rotational symmetry? now the curve on the left is way bigger than the curve on the right and it makes the slider lopsided I'm bad at making spaghetti . . .

1. Storyboard image file dimensions are more than allowed maximum (640x1440 or 1920x480 for scrolling images) or (1366x768):
   
   1. sb\1.jpg (854x1668)
   2. 
      sb\2.jpg (854x1668)
      
   3. sb\flare.png (1000x1000)
2. Unused files:
   
   1. sb\9_mask.png
   2. 
      sb\cycle.png

1. 00:19:766 (3) - Suggesting remove this circle, because it's still in the calm section and I don't feel like clicking 1/2 stuff, also to keep consistency with 00:16:092 (2) .
2. Just an idea but you can mute the slidertails that didn't land on piano/vocal or whatever you're following. Like this one 00:10:378 (1) for example.
3. 00:40:990 (3) - Prefer 2 circles instead because the piano on 00:41:398 is pretty much prominent as 00:42:214 (4) so they should be mapped in the same way.
4. 01:33:643 (3,4) - Flow is subjective and I feel like this doesn't really flow well, how about something similar to this?
5. 01:38:541 (1,2) - Could have been a 1/1 slider + something instead, at least to me 01:39:765 is stronger than 01:39:357 and the rhythm here is the same as 01:35:275 (1) - 01:36:908 (3) . So this shouldn't be denser than those 1/1 sliders.
6. 01:42:622 (2) - Remove whistle from sliderbody pls.
7. 02:46:500 - Idk I heard a piano sound here too so maybe add circle?
8. 03:07:521 (3,4) - Is there any reason for a larger spacing? Imo 1.2 DS would fit here as 03:07:929 (4) is just as prominent as 03:07:112 (2,3) .
9. 03:32:010 (3,1,2,3,4,5,6,1) - Just my preference but I'm really not a fan of 2+ DS on this part because the intensity isn't much different from 03:26:296 (1,2,3,4,5,6,1,2,3) and yet this has a bigger spacing. Also it's kinda bugging me too that it's almost as big as or even bigger than parts in kiai.
10. 04:01:398 (5) - Recommend ending this on 04:01:806 to keep consistency with 01:57:316 (5) also I didn't know there is a jump on 04:01:398 (5,1) lol.
11. 04:42:622 (2,3) - A 1/1 slider instead? You should skip the beat on 04:43:030 to focus the violin sound for simplicity, or if you want 04:43:439 (3) to be clickable then muting 04:43:030 would work too.
12. 05:18:133 (2) - I don't think there's anything here though? At least you didn't map 01:55:684 - 03:59:765 .
13. 05:24:459 (1,2,3) - Idk maybe a 1/4 repeat slider instead to make this a bit different from 05:26:092 (5,6,7) which the latter one is based on vocal.

Electoz wrote:

AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
*screams* *faint*

[Ani]

1. 00:19:766 (3) - Suggesting remove this circle, because it's still in the calm section and I don't feel like clicking 1/2 stuff, also to keep consistency with 00:16:092 (2) . yse
2. Just an idea but you can mute the slidertails that didn't land on piano/vocal or whatever you're following. Like this one 00:10:378 (1) for example. hmm, send me more detail please
3. 00:40:990 (3) - Prefer 2 circles instead because the piano on 00:41:398 is pretty much prominent as 00:42:214 (4) so they should be mapped in the same way. agree
4. 01:33:643 (3,4) - Flow is subjective and I feel like this doesn't really flow well, how about something similar to this? seems a good idea
5. 01:38:541 (1,2) - Could have been a 1/1 slider + something instead, at least to me 01:39:765 is stronger than 01:39:357 and the rhythm here is the same as 01:35:275 (1) - 01:36:908 (3) . So this shouldn't be denser than those 1/1 sliders. agree with the stronger thingy but I made it with my own rhythm
6. 01:42:622 (2) - Remove whistle from sliderbody pls. aaaaaaa
7. 02:46:500 - Idk I heard a piano sound here too so maybe add circle? naah, it'll disturb this wonderful song so nope
8. 03:07:521 (3,4) - Is there any reason for a larger spacing? Imo 1.2 DS would fit here as 03:07:929 (4) is just as prominent as 03:07:112 (2,3) . yeah, it's weird lol
9. 03:32:010 (3,1,2,3,4,5,6,1) - Just my preference but I'm really not a fan of 2+ DS on this part because the intensity isn't much different from 03:26:296 (1,2,3,4,5,6,1,2,3) and yet this has a bigger spacing. Also it's kinda bugging me too that it's almost as big as or even bigger than parts in kiai. planned to give a bit emphasize thingy but seems I need to reduce it a bit. How's 2.20 look? and also I removed the stack so the move from (2) to (3) won't be forced too much lol
10. 04:01:398 (5) - Recommend ending this on 04:01:806 to keep consistency with 01:57:316 (5) also I didn't know there is a jump on 04:01:398 (5,1) lol. ah yes, changed the ending and reduced the jump a bit . 1.5 should be ok
11. 04:42:622 (2,3) - A 1/1 slider instead? You should skip the beat on 04:43:030 to focus the violin sound for simplicity, or if you want 04:43:439 (3) to be clickable then muting 04:43:030 would work too. 3 is too strong to be ignored so yeah, muting would be my choice
12. 05:18:133 (2) - I don't think there's anything here though? At least you didn't map 01:55:684 - 03:59:765 . naah, need something new so ..
13. 05:24:459 (1,2,3) - Idk maybe a 1/4 repeat slider instead to make this a bit different from 05:26:092 (5,6,7) which the latter one is based on vocal the harp sound also play on the latter part so keeping it same is ok.

Also just an idea but would be nice if the night sky pic is moving in gameplay like the break of this song. Will tell exam about it

AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAA
*dies* *scream*

Shad0w1and wrote:

I could not find much problems for this map, since it was mapped this way.
overall pretty nice, however, the OD is way to high. the idea is, you cant expect people get hype for this song so player wont spin very fast, with od7 I feel its really hard to get 300 on spinners compare to its BPM and difficulty. also I got way too much 100s on notes. OD 5 will help a lot, though I even think OD4 would be enough. I'll try OD5
for the AR, same thing, way too high, I really suggest you set it to ar5.5 or ar6. hmm, the AR is kinda good enough for me

sb\9_mask.png
sb\cycle.png
sb\meteor.png
these files are not used and you might want to remove them

01:50:786 (1,2,3) - it plays weird to me, maybe try this

SPOILER

did try your suggestion but it feels kinda off for me.
04:32:826 (2,3,4) - spacing here is kinda weird compare to your other 1/4 did this intentionally
05:13:235 (3,4,5) - same to 01:50:786 (1,2,3) - same
m4m maybe :/
https://osu.ppy.sh/s/474696 yes

-NanoRIPE- wrote:

Hi ~ kak ;w; M4M dari q mu

[General]
aktifkan epilepsy warning? gak ada yang kelap kelip yang cepat jadi ga usah

[Ani] apa maksud dari penamaan diff ini? karakternya kah? Hadiah buat seseorang ini hehe
00:38:949 (5,1) - rada aneh dengan pattern ini,gimana slider (1) di taruh di bawah krii slider (4)? biar lebih enak gitu tpi ini enak dimainin sih menurut saya :/
00:47:928 (3) - increase curve (samakan dengan slider sebelumnya) ok
00:58:133 (4,6) - jaraknya agak di perjauh sedikit
01:16:092 (2,4) - ^ naah sepertinya masih bisa kebaca dengan mudah
01:18:745 (6,7) - kenapa malah di jauhkan? kan lebih baik di stack (dan juga agar konsisten dengan 01:00:173 (2,3) aah iya benar
01:25:479 (1) - gimana dengan curve slider aja? ga terlalu ngefek ke gameplay dan juga penampilan karena slidernya kecil
01:35:275 (1) - slidernya aneh xd (kayak nggk mendukung ritmenya) benar juga
01:39:765 (1) - inc cruve ok
01:57:316 (5) - kenapa nggk curve slider? agar lebih bervariasi?
02:15:275 (2) - ctrl j aja deh (lebih enak flownya) naah, flow yg ke (3) ntar malah rada aneh trus yg sekarang juga cocok sama lagunya
02:17:928 - spinner (empati dengan vocalnya) pendek itu vocalnya, lebih baik lansung break aja
02:43:847 (1) - sama dengan yang sebelumnya xd xd
02:56:092 (6) - ctrl j naah, sengaja saya bikin seperti ini kook
03:16:500 (1) - sama dengan sebelumnya xd xd
03:21:398 (5) - geser ke (342,232) untuk perfect blanket ok
03:35:275 (5,6) - kenapa di stack? agar bisa memberi tekanan lebih ke object selanjutnya
04:01:398 (5) - slidernya ganti dengan bentuk lain xd (rada aneh diliatnya huehue) okk
04:03:031 (3,4) - ini blanket ya? jika ya kurang sempurna tuh blanketnya dah ok kook
04:15:276 (1,2) - hmm kayaknya kurang mantep flownya ~ coba bikin kayak 02:11:194 (1,2) beda vocal = beda wujud imo
04:25:888 (3) - gimana kalau ctrl j? boleh juga

itu aja yg saya bisa temukan ~ (maaf kalau kelihatan pendek modnya xd)
GL ~

1. AR7.3 is probably too high. For a different perspective, please see my ranked Hard (AR6.5) here: https://osu.ppy.sh/s/325112. I feel like the AR of this map is too high.

1. 00:30:786 (2,3) - In general, you should map objects in relation to the end of the slider tail, so that the arrows in the default skin point outwards similar to the direction in which the slider is pointing. This is especially true of lower difficulties, so I strongly suggest that you look at all the patterns throughout the map and fix flow issues like these.
2. 00:38:949 (5,1) - Even if you did this on purpose, I don't think it fits the song. Overlaps like these should be avoided on a simple song like this one. Try using some other differentiating factor like increasing the spacing instead.
3. 00:44:663 (3,4,5) - For triangle patterns like these, you should really use the "Create Polygon Circles" feature that is built into the editor. Right now your triangle has too much height and not enough width.
4. 00:52:826 (1,2,3) - Again with flow. I feel like you could make this flow much better by moving slider 3 to the left more. I am going to stop referencing these issues to save time, but you should review your map and make sure that you like every part of it. Change any parts you see fit, after all, it's your map. Sometimes as mappers we feel like we must keep the map the same since we mapped it, but I learned through my experience that even though I mapped something, I can also change it to make it better.
5. 01:00:786 (3) - There is a strong vocal here, so a circle here doesn't make much sense. I changed this to a slider (ending at 01:00:786 (3) -) and it played much better. I strongly suggest that you try it as well.
6. 01:02:214 - If you listen to the song, there is a rather strong beat here that can be mapped. I suggest that you add a circle here. Similar for 01:08:745 - and other patterns. I'm not sure if you're doing this intentionally, but it's noticeable enough to bring it up as an issue, especially since 01:08:745 - is part of the melody at 01:07:520 -, etc.
7. 01:18:133 (6,7,1) - Try making slider 6 a repeat slider instead of forcing the player to tap 1/4 on this quiet part of the song.
8. 01:38:541 (1,3) - These sliders are a bit too close to my liking. Look at the arrows between slider 1's tail, circle 2, and slider 3's head. As you can see, the objects are not aligned properly. There is an angle between slider 1 and circle 2 but that angle does not exist between circle 2 and slider 3. You should move slider 3 up a bit to fix the angle. It will improve the overall aesthetics of the map if you used consistent angles like this.
9. 02:11:194 (1,2) - These aren't properly symmetrical about the y-axis.
10. 01:57:316 (5) - What is the reason for a sharply curved slider here? There is nothing in the music that would call for it, so I think it would be best if you used a simple slider for a simple part of the song, i.e. a straight slider or a curved slider.
11. 02:02:214 (3,4) - Is there any reason why you're using an anti-spacing pattern here? I think it's best not to overlap them, i.e. place slider 4 somewhere near slider 3 but not exactly near. Since you're emphasizing a vocal wait, it may be better to have the sliders act similarly, i.e. the player should move the same horizontal length. Something like this:
    
    
    ~
12. 02:05:684 (2,3,4,5) - This is a significant difficulty increase. It's probably OK since this is technically a map for approval, but you can also uses sliders here instead to make it a more reasonable difficulty. Beginners playing this map will be confronted with multiple 1/4 circles 2 minutes into the map, which may cause them to lose combo since they usually prefer mouse clicks, etc.
13. 02:17:316 (4,5,1) - I find this a bit strange, don't you agree? The vocalist holds her note here, so as such, a slider would be ideal.
14. 02:17:316 (4,5,1) - Similar to what I said above, I think an overlap such as this (slider head semi-hidden by other slider head) does not fit the song nor the other parts of the map very well. Consider the suggestions I mentioned above.
15. 03:01:806 (3,4,5,6,1,2,3,4,5,6) - Just going to say that this is an awesome pattern. You should use similar patterns where the music allows for it.
16. 03:26:296 (1,2,3) - It looks like these sliders were not rotated by the same amount of degrees. Did you use the dedicated Rotation Tool or did you just eyeball it? It's best to use the Rotation Tool (Ctrl+Shift+R).
17. 03:45:888 (1,2,3,4,5) - Is there any reason why you're going down and then back up here? This part 03:47:520 - is part of 03:45:888 -, so it should have similar flow. Something like x:240 y:284 for a Ctrl+J'd version of 03:47:520 (5) - makes more sense. Of course, you will need to adjust the next few objects as needed.
18. 04:01:398 (5) - Similar to what I mentioned in an above suggestion, this sharp edge does not reflect the nature of this part of the song.
19. 04:37:724 (8) - Why is this stacked with 6? Based on the other patterns in 04:34:867 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) -, circle 8 should be slightly above circle 6.
20. 05:10:786 (1) - This slider ends too early. The vocal ends at 05:12:010 -, so the note needs to be adjusted accordingly. Additionally, when the repeat is at 05:11:398 -, it plays much better IMO.
21. 05:13:235 (3,4,5) - This part of the song is much too quiet to have the player go through something like this. Instead, you can keep the rhythm but make the pattern simpler by adding more repeats to a single slider instead of using multiple sliders. Another fine option would be to use slider art to represent the rhythm, like most Normal difficulties do.
22. 05:33:643 (1,2,1) - Uh oh, looks like Circle 1 isn't symmetrical across the y-axis.
23. 05:43:030 - You can't do this since the wait time between the spinner and the next object is 1/2. As you can observe, the next circle shows up before the spinner finishes, giving the player little time to react, especially in an easier difficulty. Try using a different pattern or adjusting the spinner time instead.
24. Here's a summary of what I suggest: use more flow, some parts need to be fixed in order to be symmetrical, use sliders for hold notes and other long patterns by the vocalist.

Project Railgun wrote:

Here's my m4m as promised!

This is a nice storyboard, good job examination!

[General]

1. AR7.3 is probably too high. For a different perspective, please see my ranked Hard (AR6.5) here: https://osu.ppy.sh/s/325112. I feel like the AR of this map is too high. I'll go 6.7 because it fits better for me

[Ani]

1. 00:30:786 (2,3) - In general, you should map objects in relation to the end of the slider tail, so that the arrows in the default skin point outwards similar to the direction in which the slider is pointing. This is especially true of lower difficulties, so I strongly suggest that you look at all the patterns throughout the map and fix flow issues like these. true, thanks for mentioning!
2. 00:38:949 (5,1) - Even if you did this on purpose, I don't think it fits the song. Overlaps like these should be avoided on a simple song like this one. Try using some other differentiating factor like increasing the spacing instead. since people keep asking for this, alright then.
3. 00:44:663 (3,4,5) - For triangle patterns like these, you should really use the "Create Polygon Circles" feature that is built into the editor. Right now your triangle has too much height and not enough width. there
4. 00:52:826 (1,2,3) - Again with flow. I feel like you could make this flow much better by moving slider 3 to the left more. I am going to stop referencing these issues to save time, but you should review your map and make sure that you like every part of it. Change any parts you see fit, after all, it's your map. Sometimes as mappers we feel like we must keep the map the same since we mapped it, but I learned through my experience that even though I mapped something, I can also change it to make it better. alright
5. 01:00:786 (3) - There is a strong vocal here, so a circle here doesn't make much sense. I changed this to a slider (ending at 01:00:786 (3) -) and it played much better. I strongly suggest that you try it as well. yes
6. 01:02:214 - If you listen to the song, there is a rather strong beat here that can be mapped. I suggest that you add a circle here. Similar for 01:08:745 - and other patterns. I'm not sure if you're doing this intentionally, but it's noticeable enough to bring it up as an issue, especially since 01:08:745 - is part of the melody at 01:07:520 -, etc. adding objects at the places that you mentioned is kinda make the map less enjoyed for me because hmm, I'm trying to fit the vocal better at here
7. 01:18:133 (6,7,1) - Try making slider 6 a repeat slider instead of forcing the player to tap 1/4 on this quiet part of the song. I think the current one fits better because the (6) slider follows the bgm goodly while (7) and (1) is quite good impact to end a part from the song
8. 01:38:541 (1,3) - These sliders are a bit too close to my liking. Look at the arrows between slider 1's tail, circle 2, and slider 3's head. As you can see, the objects are not aligned properly. There is an angle between slider 1 and circle 2 but that angle does not exist between circle 2 and slider 3. You should move slider 3 up a bit to fix the angle. It will improve the overall aesthetics of the map if you used consistent angles like this. aah, looks better , thank you
9. 02:11:194 (1,2) - These aren't properly symmetrical about the y-axis. aah, true
10. 01:57:316 (5) - What is the reason for a sharply curved slider here? There is nothing in the music that would call for it, so I think it would be best if you used a simple slider for a simple part of the song, i.e. a straight slider or a curved slider. ahaha , okay
11. 02:02:214 (3,4) - Is there any reason why you're using an anti-spacing pattern here? I think it's best not to overlap them, i.e. place slider 4 somewhere near slider 3 but not exactly near. Since you're emphasizing a vocal wait, it may be better to have the sliders act similarly, i.e. the player should move the same horizontal length. Something like this:
    
    aah, true
    ~
12. 02:05:684 (2,3,4,5) - This is a significant difficulty increase. It's probably OK since this is technically a map for approval, but you can also uses sliders here instead to make it a more reasonable difficulty. Beginners playing this map will be confronted with multiple 1/4 circles 2 minutes into the map, which may cause them to lose combo since they usually prefer mouse clicks, etc. hmm, i really want to keep this one
13. 02:17:316 (4,5,1) - I find this a bit strange, don't you agree? The vocalist holds her note here, so as such, a slider would be ideal. yes
14. 02:17:316 (4,5,1) - Similar to what I said above, I think an overlap such as this (slider head semi-hidden by other slider head) does not fit the song nor the other parts of the map very well. Consider the suggestions I mentioned above. alright
15. 03:01:806 (3,4,5,6,1,2,3,4,5,6) - Just going to say that this is an awesome pattern. You should use similar patterns where the music allows for it. Thanks !
16. 03:26:296 (1,2,3) - It looks like these sliders were not rotated by the same amount of degrees. Did you use the dedicated Rotation Tool or did you just eyeball it? It's best to use the Rotation Tool (Ctrl+Shift+R). fixed
17. 03:45:888 (1,2,3,4,5) - Is there any reason why you're going down and then back up here? This part 03:47:520 - is part of 03:45:888 -, so it should have similar flow. Something like x:240 y:284 for a Ctrl+J'd version of 03:47:520 (5) - makes more sense. Of course, you will need to adjust the next few objects as needed. alright, true
18. 04:01:398 (5) - Similar to what I mentioned in an above suggestion, this sharp edge does not reflect the nature of this part of the song. yes
19. 04:37:724 (8) - Why is this stacked with 6? Based on the other patterns in 04:34:867 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) -, circle 8 should be slightly above circle 6. aah, good thing that you mentioned it
20. 05:10:786 (1) - This slider ends too early. The vocal ends at 05:12:010 -, so the note needs to be adjusted accordingly. Additionally, when the repeat is at 05:11:398 -, it plays much better IMO. aah, you're right. Thanks
21. 05:13:235 (3,4,5) - This part of the song is much too quiet to have the player go through something like this. Instead, you can keep the rhythm but make the pattern simpler by adding more repeats to a single slider instead of using multiple sliders. Another fine option would be to use slider art to represent the rhythm, like most Normal difficulties do. nerfed into 2 sliders
22. 05:33:643 (1,2,1) - Uh oh, looks like Circle 1 isn't symmetrical across the y-axis. there
23. 05:43:030 - You can't do this since the wait time between the spinner and the next object is 1/2. As you can observe, the next circle shows up before the spinner finishes, giving the player little time to react, especially in an easier difficulty. Try using a different pattern or adjusting the spinner time instead okay
24. Here's a summary of what I suggest: use more flow, some parts need to be fixed in order to be symmetrical, use sliders for hold notes and other long patterns by the vocalist.

Good luck!

Yahuri wrote:

from q desu

General
-DS changes very often, i dont think youre allowed to do that in a Normal diff (even marathon) spots for DS, but make sure that this is rankable. i wont point out many Nooo, I wasn't planning to make a normal diff on this one

Ani
00:02:214 (2) - 00:03:848 (1) - blanket? there
00:05:480 (2,1) - stack? did this intentionally
00:31:602 (3,4,5) - make perfect triangle monstrata'd
00:33:235 (1,2) - blanket not for this one
00:38:949 (5,1) - move so that object spacing (NOT DS) is the same as 00:36:908 (2,3) NC saved the sudden DS jump
00:39:765 (1,2) - make these sliders have the same curvature aight
00:40:990 (3,4,5) - DS is very misleading, move 5 further away it's ok, quite interesting imo
00:43:030 (1,2) - fix blanket it's already ok , i guess
00:47:724 - missed a lyric here alright
00:52:010 (6,1) - move further away for object spacing don't really undestand but this looks okay
00:55:071 (1,2) - rhythm here might be hard to play for your target audience, so keep that in mind should be readable for decent hard players
00:57:724 (3,4,5,6) - square? fix'd a bit
01:01:806 (4,1) - stack? naah
01:08:337 (6,1) - ^ aaah
01:13:235 (2,4) - move to avoid overlap sure
01:15:684 (1,4) - overlap looks kinda meh how's now
01:23:847 (3,4) - flow better if you move 4 to the right imo aight
01:41:398 (6,1) - move 1 up for object spacing alright
01:50:786 (1,2,3) - short sliders like this probably shouldnt be used in a Normal diff (but BPM is pretty low so you might be able to get away with it) hard
01:52:418 (3,4) - fix blanket eyoo
02:04:663 (1,2,3,4,5) - abrupt difficulty change, before there were plenty of breaks but now its a whole bunch of circles with 1/4 beat spacing apply this to other kiais as well i need SR
02:07:928 (1,2,3,4,5) - ^ yes
02:06:908 (6,7) - rhythm might be confusing, try turning these 02:06:296 (5,6,7) into a reverse slider apply this to other kiais as well it becomes awkward to play
02:09:561 (5,6) - ^ yes
02:43:030 (5,1) - separate more for object spacing already good enough
03:05:888 (5,6,1,3) - all these overlaps are confusing true
03:15:684 (4,1) - get rid of overlap? intentional
03:36:908 (1,2) - make 1 curve towards 2 instead of away from it okay
03:42:622 (1,2,3) - make reverse slider? i want to click something
04:02:623 (2,3) - flow not good, angle 3 upwards instead of downwards yes
04:06:296 (3) - ctrl+h the slider so that the flow continues left towards 04:07:725 (4) it doesn't really affect the gameplay much tho
04:32:826 (2,3,4) - why change spacing here? trying something
04:34:867 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - pattern is repetitive, overlaps dont look very appealing fix'd a bit , pattern is okay
05:13:541 (4,1) - i would think that many beginner players would miss this jump, decrease DS and/or simplify rhythm this map isn't really for beginners tho
05:43:439 (1,2,3) - make reverse slider? i want to click too
05:45:071 (1,2,3) - ^
06:12:826 (1,1,1) - too many spinners is tiring, i would make 2 artsy sliders and keep the last spinner. 78 bpm spin isn't really that tiring

Good luck!

1. Normal = Just Suggestions for reference ovo
2. Blue = Strongly suggest you do this :3
3. Red = Unrankable stuff 0.0..

1. Fine to me.

1. I dunno if this was a bug caused by my PC. I didn't search for the lyrics, but I guess the lyric here should be 'あなたの姿を映る'
   
   SPOILER

   
2. Also mistake here. The lyric should be 'あなたのことを聞こえた’
   
   SPOILER

   
   
   Good job overall, but still some small mistakes need revising~
   Search for the lyrics first before revising, what I hear might not be the correct ones.
   
   [Ani]
   
   1. 00:21:806 (2) - I personnally prefer a whistle here and set the volume to around 10%; also I guess the slider tail should be quieter than (1) since the vocal becomes quieter too
   2. 00:29:969 (1,2) - Perhaps you can lower the volume of the two tails, since there are only 1 syllable here ('を'and'つ') , which is different from 00:36:500 (1,2,3)
   3. 01:14:051 (3) - How about extending this slider to 01:14:663? Sounds better to me and is not hard at all :>
   4. 01:58:133 (1,2) - I suggest moving these 2 notes to around (384,144) to make the flow better
   5. 02:14:459 (1,2) - Slow down the 2 sliders (not including (3)) may sound beeter to me
   6. 02:44:459 (2,3) - Why not make the spacing here larger since you're not mapping a Normal diff :/ It looks a bit messed this way
   7. 02:58:133 (3) - I think it ought to end on 02:58:949... It sounds very strange to me.
   8. 04:43:847 (1) - Either removing the whistle on the tail or lowering its volume as you do on 04:42:622 (2) will sound good imo
   9. 05:49:969 (1) - Why NC on this one orz
   Peaceful and relaxing map, and I cannot find many problems :/
   Stared ~
   I remember modding another koibumi map by kanpakyin before

1. Storyboard : 01:20:786 the image starting here rotates so slowly the movement is barely noticable, I got distracted trying to see if it was really moving or not, consider having it rotate a bit faster please.

1. 00:33:235 (1,2) - Maybe make 2 blanket the end of 1 instead? They're close enough that when it doesn't it looks a bit weird since the end of 2 gets a bit uncomfortably close to 1.
2. 00:47:928 (4) - This doesn't follow the curve that you were making with 4's head and 00:47:520 (2,3) - Consider changing 4 to curve more to the left to fix this.
3. 01:18:133 (6,7) - Maybe reduce the spacing between these two notes, a 3.6 ds jump is a bit heavy compared to the map previously, and it's quite easy to slider break on (6) from trying to reach (7) in time. Even 2.5 or 3.0 should fit better.
4. 01:22:214 (1) - Try moving the red anchor so that the ball will be centered on it at the red tick, making it bounce in time to the song more accurately.
   
   \./

   
   picture still isn't perfect but I hope it gets the idea accross.
5. 01:35:275 (1,2) - The flow from 1->2 is a bit sharper than the song calls for an a bit awkward to play. Changing (1)'s shape should be able to fix that. D:
6. 01:36:908 (3) - Maybe slightly change the slider's shape at the end
7. 03:15:684 (4,1) - I don't think this particular overlap looks too good, as a lot of (1) is getting covered up. Consider moving (1) elsewhere.
8. 03:35:275 (5,6) - Since stacking moved 6 down and to the right, it's almost nearly completely covered by 5. Maybe manually stack it by moving it up and to the left of 5's slider end by like 4 pixels each.
   
   so that it still looks stacked but also makes 6 more visible.

   
9. 04:43:847 (1) - I personally heavily dislike the shape of this slider, it looks messy and x( It's the only major thing about this map that sticks out to me Suggestion, but feel free to consider anything else ;;

raririn wrote:

[Storyboard]

1. I dunno if this was a bug caused by my PC. I didn't search for the lyrics, but I guess the lyric here should be 'あなたの姿を映る' [/color]
   
   SPOILER

   
2. Also mistake here. The lyric should be 'あなたのことを聞こえた’　[/color]
   
   SPOILER

   
   
   Good job overall, but still some small mistakes need revising~
   Search for the lyrics first before revising, what I hear might not be the correct ones.

Noffy wrote:

Hi! Mod as requested from my queue

1. Storyboard : 01:20:786 the image starting here rotates so slowly the movement is barely noticable, I got distracted trying to see if it was really moving or not, consider having it rotate a bit faster please.　I think it's fine

1. You should try to use more of the gamefield, it feels so cluttered rn
2. 00:38:949 (5,1) - So you said it's supposed to be a Hard, right? Then you should try to keep the flow as simple as possible, especially when using jumps like this.
3. 00:44:663 (3,4,5,6) - Vocals would give a nice 2-2 pattern, so the current placement doesn't emphasize it at all.
4. 00:47:928 (4,1) - There's a whole 1/1 gap so you could place it a bit further away without any problems.
5. 00:53:643 (2) - This circle could have a little emphasis like the object afterwards too because of the "unique" vocal on it.
6. 01:00:173 (2,3) - Why are they overlapping way less than 01:05:888 (1,2) ?
7. 01:13:235 (2,3) - You used ^ this pattern before, that's exactly the same part but your rhythm usage is different here. Please stay as consistent as possible in such easy diffs.
8. 01:28:745 (1) - Could have a more dense pattern like before.
9. 01:31:602 (4) - Has a really "strong" vocal on it so consider giving it at least a slight emphasis.
10. 01:33:643 (3) - Strong piano sound but same spacing? Before you gave such sounds a higher spacing iirc.
11. 01:35:275 (1) - You are ignoring quite some vocals here when you tried to cover as much as possible before
12. 02:05:684 (2,3,4,5) - The vocal on the first circle can actually be ignored as it's too soft to be mapped.
13. 02:59:357 (5,1) - Earlier you didn't use a custom stack for a larger gap. :v
14. 03:05:888 (5,6) - A slider might be better as the sound on (6) is kinda unexpectable (at least for me) and also having two different kind of stacks in a row for this difficulty level is pretty hard to read as well.
15. 03:09:970 (1,2) - Shouldn't have a 1/2 spacing. You let 1/4 patterns overlap all the time so this is a big reading issue.
16. 03:42:622 (1,2,3) - 3/4 rhythms are really unusual for Hards, so using a 3/4 repeat-slider rather than circle would help a lot there.

Stjpa wrote:

1. You should try to use more of the gamefield, it feels so cluttered rn hmm I wonder if I can buff something
2. 00:38:949 (5,1) - So you said it's supposed to be a Hard, right? Then you should try to keep the flow as simple as possible, especially when using jumps like this. alrright.
3. 00:44:663 (3,4,5,6) - Vocals would give a nice 2-2 pattern, so the current placement doesn't emphasize it at all. done
4. 00:47:928 (4,1) - There's a whole 1/1 gap so you could place it a bit further away without any problems. alright
5. 00:53:643 (2) - This circle could have a little emphasis like the object afterwards too because of the "unique" vocal on it. sure
6. 01:00:173 (2,3) - Why are they overlapping way less than 01:05:888 (1,2) ? aaa, true
7. 01:13:235 (2,3) - You used ^ this pattern before, that's exactly the same part but your rhythm usage is different here. Please stay as consistent as possible in such easy diffs. alright, I make it same now
8. 01:28:745 (1) - Could have a more dense pattern like before. ay ay
9. 01:31:602 (4) - Has a really "strong" vocal on it so consider giving it at least a slight emphasis. done
10. 01:33:643 (3) - Strong piano sound but same spacing? Before you gave such sounds a higher spacing iirc. alright
11. 01:35:275 (1) - You are ignoring quite some vocals here when you tried to cover as much as possible before the thing is , this part is more calm than before that's why.
12. 02:05:684 (2,3,4,5) - The vocal on the first circle can actually be ignored as it's too soft to be mapped. mmh, it's quite strong for me
13. 02:59:357 (5,1) - Earlier you didn't use a custom stack for a larger gap. :v I'm giving something new?
14. 03:05:888 (5,6) - A slider might be better as the sound on (6) is kinda unexpectable (at least for me) and also having two different kind of stacks in a row for this difficulty level is pretty hard to read as well. alright, changed it
15. 03:09:970 (1,2) - Shouldn't have a 1/2 spacing. You let 1/4 patterns overlap all the time so this is a big reading issue. hmm, true
16. 03:42:622 (1,2,3) - 3/4 rhythms are really unusual for Hards, so using a 3/4 repeat-slider rather than circle would help a lot there. I really really want to click something on these timelines so...

Just to make sure: I didn't mention every little problem because sometimes the issues I mentioned appeared multiple times in the map. All in all, it actually still needs quite some polishment. :<

MrSergio wrote:

#modreqs from the past plus quite a few reminders in chat =w= heheHehEHEHE

00:23:847 (1) - whistle? Alright
00:40:990 (3,4,5) - spacing inconsistency here. I'd say... move 5 t around x352 y68 to fix DS or idk, maybe try a different pattern. As it is I can't really accept that :/ naaah, I did it intentionally.
00:45:479 (5,6) - again... you don't like constant DS perhaps? xD It is a slow song and the overall diff is not high. Most of the times it seems to be a Normal so a constant DS just comes naturally to my mind Nope, this is a hard diff. (I really should put my diff plan on the first post)
01:22:214 (1) - I bet you can make this shape less cramped, like this code plssss I can't make sliders D:
01:50:786 (1,2,3) - this comes out of nowhere considering the overall difficulty of the map. I'd rather keep only one of these sliders, but with more repeats for readability I'm trying to follow the quick violin sound at here so...
02:44:459 (2) - clearly not respecting DS. Small details make a huge difference, trust me Alright, I fixed it
02:59:357 (5,1) - I'm pretty sure this is not the same DS you used for the same patterns before this one (01:01:806 (4,1) - reference) (also, comparison) Alright, fixed
03:06:092 (6,1) - make sure this stuff is consistent. As I said, small details make a huge difference Alright, I'll stack (1) with (2)
03:10:582 (2) - DS, again. Although this pattern would be cool if used more in the map, since I can see there is a cool logic behind it and works well, but as it is now, it's just purely inconsistent with the rest this is okay, I guess. It's readable and it emphasizing enough with the song
03:15:684 (4,1) - first time seeing such an overlap probably... it's not so cool in general (your other 1/1 snaps with circles do not count, since this is a 1/2 snap with sliders) But it's looks cool D:
03:25:479 - ""storyboard"" the new background comes out of nowhere. I know there is that particular sound here, but please no, it just doesn't feel right for me mmm
03:26:296 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - well, the whole combo has a bit of an unstable DS, but the last object is just too distant imo. fixed a bit
03:43:235 (2,3,4) - visual spacing is misleading because you once again don't use constant DS my...
03:45:888 (1,2,3,4,5) - what about a pentagon instead? At least it looks more organized this way I prefer sharp movements instead.
04:25:888 (3) - ctrl + g? naah, I already love this one
04:43:847 (1) - no matter how I look at this, it's not so well made. Try something like this coooodeeee please ;;
04:45:684 (1) - I'd make this spinner finish at 04:47:112 - where violins stop playing, and add the break effect at 04:47:928 - , like this good , idea
05:13:235 (3,4) - same as before, and it is not even consistent with the other pattern =w=" did a bit fixes
05:18:133 (2) - this beat wasn't mapped before, at 01:55:275 - or at 03:59:357 - I'm trying to give the player something new for the last kiai since the other 2 is same each other
05:26:296 (6,7) - DS is not constant again and it is noticeable it plays fine for me
05:39:765 - I'd map the vocal here, but I guess it's preference, idk naaah, since it's the last kiai I'd like to give the player "This is the last" experience
06:09:561 (1,2) - why are these different? The song doesn't change from what I can hear same ^^

Overall I can't really see this map ready yet, Shurelia :/
Mostly because I don't see a solid structure, mostly due to random DS when the song remains mostly plain.
For example:
02:48:745 (3,4,5,6) - this passage doesn't tell me much. Why is it like that? Alright, the first 3 tells that the music is going down as you can hear from the violin and why I placed the 6 on the upper , it's because the sudden quite strong voice in the next (1) and I really want to make it clear about that
03:13:235 (1,2,3,4) - all these 4 shapes at once don't tell me anything once again. Why do they have that direction and they are curved like that? this is... hmm looks a bit weird but plays fine for me , hmm . did a bit change tho
04:12:010 (1) - slider shapes are like accessories you put on your map: they must be similar in concept (they need to fit together). And this shape looks a bit random compared to the rest. alright, screw the red. I can't sliders after all

Summed up: this map needs more structure (aka, planning before hand of patterns), since in general note placement feels random to me :/

236,56,82214,6,0,B|272:56|290:91|290:91|336:84|364:120,1,143.000004364014,2|0,0:0|0:0,0:0:0:0:

109,195,283847,6,0,B|68:192|56:148|80:120|80:120|56:72|104:40|104:40|164:72|216:48,1,311.999990478516,2|2,0:0|0:0,0:0:0:0:

Cellina wrote:

sorry for late mod ;w;

Ani

1. 00:40:990 (3,4,5) - this definitely confuse players, I promise. (even I did). I suggest to put more distance between (4) and (5). alright
2. 00:45:479 (5,6,1) - the shape and the flow is kinda ugly... you don't really have to care since this has a slow bpm fixed
3. 00:50:786 (4,5) - put 1.2x ds cuz the difference of ds doesn't really shows up aah right
4. 01:18:133 (6,7,1) - reduce ds a bit? cuz you overlapped when there is a 1/2 notes, and players will think it's a 1/1. done
5. 01:32:010 (1) - move right anchor bit higher to make better S shaped slider okk
6. 01:40:990 (5,1) - overlap looks bit messy done
7. 01:50:786 (1,2,3) - even if this is a hard, this will definitely confuse players. it's still doable
8. 02:05:888 (3,4,5) - there are too many 1/2 at once, so how about making them as 1/2 repeat slider? naah, I want to click something at here

well i think you have to look your map again and apply those mods to your whole map xD

(btw i realized its a 1/4 not a 1/2 lol)

Anxient wrote:

modreq via message

Ani

00:16:092 (2,1) - possibility for blanket. i recommend you do this for visual sure
00:20:174 (1,2) - i think this jagged slider is a bad idea, coz the song is very smooth = not very suitable. better if you use smooth sliders instead. alright
00:32:418 (5) - i think a blanket is better. plus, this slider fits better into the previous pattern than it used to. http://puu.sh/rPw6K/7b26ff7a31.jpg yes
00:34:051 (2,3) - move both of these in a way where [2 and 3] will blanket 00:33:235 (1) - [slider end]. looks better visually and gets rid of the annoying aight00:32:418 (5,2) - near overlap.
00:40:377 (2,4) - blanket possibility. done
00:45:888 (6) - i think its better if you stacked it with [5], so 00:46:296 (1) - gets more emphasis. its a bit louder than usual so best if you emphasized this. plus, [6] sounds a lot like [5] imo so this is better. agreed
00:46:296 (1) - this is too close to 00:45:479 (5) - imo; to a point that it nearly overlaps. imo its better to do this something like this. 00:47:112 (2,3) -. tip of mine would be to make the distance gradually increase coz i think it gets a bit louder with every beat. http://puu.sh/rPwn4/5d2d4d79ba.jpg, final: http://puu.sh/rPwpV/d2d588b2c3.jpg should be k now
00:52:010 (6) - i think this is too close to [5]. flip this and move to x273 y155. it might work for you. end result http://puu.sh/rPxet/ea5bb0c6d8.jpg lovely
00:53:643 (2) - i think its better if you give this shorter distance from [1 to 2] for emphasis on 00:54:051 - [url]coz of the sound in 3.[/url]http://puu.sh/rPxgQ/fc99b9d8a7.jpg did something similar
00:55:071 - this sound is way too unnoticeable for it to be a clickable object, when 00:55:275 - a louder sound is unclickable. i think its better if you did this instead. http://puu.sh/rPxm0/d8a0f3a898.jpg good idea
01:04:255 (5,6) - i think its better if you ctrl g these two. like, highlight theem both and then ctrl g. imo [5] has more emphasis and i think that should be treated accordingly ;p truee
01:10:786 (3,1) - avoidable overlap. looks weird imo meh
01:17:316 (5) - methinks its better if you put in x419 y192 coz its more neater and theres blanket opportunity with 01:18:133 (6) - lovely
01:31:602 (4) - better if you stack this in 01:31:194 - sliderend instead for emphasis on 01:32:010 - . awesomee
01:33:235 (2) - make same DS? aww
01:36:500 (2) - ^ .75 and .72 isn't noticeable much imo

01:52:418 (3) - i think this can be better by shirnking to 3/4 size and add a hitcircle in 01:53:235 - . http://puu.sh/rPy8b/10bbee1df5.jpg let's try it
01:57:112 - i think i hear something in here. ya think its enough to warrant a triple? nope, used 0% HS sound and i didn't hear anything
02:00:582 (1) - rotate by -21 degrees from position. i think it looks better http://puu.sh/rPyS1/f9f36dcc7b.jpg dnoe
02:05:684 - i think this part can be more creative, rather than only using streams. heres what i did, to give you an idea. http://puu.sh/rPyV6/1e5c2e1324.jpg tried this but it kinda not ok for me since I really want to click something (5)
02:08:949 - same applies here. same
02:34:051 (1,2,3) - considering that these sound about as loud, i think its better to use same DS. okay
02:43:030 (5,1) - visual space this normally like this 02:42:214 (4,5) - . imo looks weird as is, coz the near overlap looks unnatural. just move the entire pattern, http://puu.sh/rPz5w/d6acdba253.jpg ookay
02:45:071 (3) - looks too angled, compared to this 02:43:847 (1,2) - . try not to deviate too much from the previous angle so it doesnt appear random, even if it isnt your intention. http://puu.sh/rPz9V/be08fcdf47.jpg should be k now
03:05:888 (5) - i think its better if you had it repeat once. theres a small sound 03:06:296 - (harp?). also plays less weirdly imo. sure
03:08:337 (5,6) - same as the 1st mod. this is a super chill song so i dont think its a good idea to use jagged sliders. doesnt reflect the song that well imo yeaah
03:20:990 (4,5,6) - blanket chance? hhm, I moved it elsewhere instead
03:25:479 - 03:25:684 - that transition though. use fade in or something lol. this looks so jarring I'll let exam know.
03:29:561 - clickable beat over here. please dont use sliderends for strong(er) beats. use this rhythm? http://puu.sh/rPznA/86404ea196.jpg I used different rhythm instad but make it clickable
03:40:990 (3) - same same
03:56:500 - same as the above mod. make it 3/4 in length and add a hitcircle on the top for emphasis. suits the map better. done
04:03:643 - no triple? naah
04:07:725 (4) - make this horizontal legnth and place on x243 y182. coz as it is rn, it could be misread as a 1/2 http://puu.sh/rPzvU/2bfa0825ca.jpg moved this else where
04:09:765 - 04:13:030 - same as above. i think stream only is boring lol. this song deserves better ;~; same
04:25:888 (3) - over emphasized. ctrl g fixes this. sure
04:34:867 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - lol? this looks random. try putting in something more creative, coz this looks boring ;w; hmm, this looks and plays fine
05:10:786 (1,2) - better blanket? done
05:14:867 - i think its better if you did this instead, so you dont waste the beat 05:15:684 - in here. http://puu.sh/rPzVN/319e2d8adf.jpg sure
05:21:398 - threading dangerously, i am. but i gotta make a proposal; maybe its better if you shortened this to 1/2 and added a double at the end? so you hit all the available beats. http://puu.sh/rPA1b/29259713a5.jpg suree
05:26:092 (5,6,7) - lol, make it the same DS? why is it differentr lmao seems it trolled me
05:31:194 - same here ;w;
05:32:010 (5) - same. same

v - nice edit w

1. 00:23:847 (1) - this spinner actually should start here 00:23:643
2. 00:29:561 (1,1) - stack better and imo you should remmove the second nc
3. 00:19:357 (2,1) - stack better ... won't say anything about the stacks anymore since i see that it was intentially done, thing wich i don't support personally, but if it's your style is ok o3o
4. 00:45:888 (6,1) - the flow is a bit so so here bcs the slider should be a curvy one to follow the round flow pattern of 00:43:030 (1,2,3,4,5,6) -
5. 00:59:357 (1) - do a soft shade it doesen't fit in the pattern
6. 01:05:071 (6,1,2) - i would suggest you a pattern like that:
   
   SPOILER

   
   better view:
   

   88,189,65071,2,0,P|111:219|146:235,1,77.999997619629,2|0,0:0|0:0,0:0:0:0:
   280,188,65888,6,0,P|315:203|338:234,1,77.999997619629,2|0,0:0|0:0,0:0:0:0:
   412,280,66500,2,0,P|424:236|412:192,1,77.999997619629
   420,116,67112,1,2,0:0:0:0:

7. 01:18:949 (1) - i would suggest to use a slider removing 01:20:582 (9) - aswell creating a reverse slider, to give more importance to the vocal starting at 01:18:949 (1) - wich you missed totally
   
8. 01:27:928 (4) - ctrl+g flows better imo
9. 02:02:214 (3,4) - you could use a softer and bit curved form for this two wich are to straight imo
10. 02:06:296 (5,6) - example 1 // 02:09:561 (5) - exsample 2 // ecc ecc all kiai section should have a different kind of patter like :
    
    
    would sound a bit better for the vocals and follow the rhythm better as it is atm
11. 02:17:928 - a spinner would be great here imo
12. 02:47:112 (1,2,3,4) - flows really bad bcs of 02:47:929 (2,3,4) - wich should go in the other direction imo like this;
    
    SPOILER

    

    232,136,167112,6,0,P|257:164|268:202,1,77.999997619629,2|0,0:0|0:0,0:0:0:0:
    199,266,167929,2,0,P|173:236|163:199,1,77.999997619629,2|0,0:0|0:0,0:0:0:0:
    152,108,168745,1,2,0:0:0:0:
    224,44,169153,1,0,0:0:0:0:
    316,72,169561,1,2,0:0:0:0:
    412,56,169970,1,0,0:0:0:0:

13. 02:52:010 (3) - better ctrl+j
14. 03:04:255 (2) - for a better flow you should a) make it curvy or b) put the slider more down
15. 03:15:684 (4,1) - not big fan of this kind of overlaps
16. 03:23:031 (1) - one again you're stopping the vocal, here should be a slider
17. 03:30:377 (2,3) - sounds a bit wrong try with :
    
18. 04:00:174 (3,4) - try with a slider here gives a better look to the pause that you're making
19. 04:19:357 (2,3) - here flows very bad try to improve the flow by following it:
    
    SPOILER

    
20. 05:13:235 (3,4,1) - you could use the same pattern as 01:50:786 (1,2,3,1) - would make less confusion
21. 05:15:684 (5) - curve it for a better flow
22. 05:20:582 (1) - same ^
23. 05:32:010 (5,6) - same lke the prev suggestion to add a slider

Lally wrote:

#Queue

really long time not modding so don't blame o3o!! Welcome back, Lally! o3o , Glad to see you again

1. 00:23:847 (1) - this spinner actually should start here 00:23:643 agree
2. 00:29:561 (1,1) - stack better and imo you should remmove the second nc whoaa, nice catch
3. 00:19:357 (2,1) - stack better ... won't say anything about the stacks anymore since i see that it was intentially done, thing wich i don't support personally, but if it's your style is ok o3o blame the stack system o3o
4. 00:45:888 (6,1) - the flow is a bit so so here bcs the slider should be a curvy one to follow the round flow pattern of 00:43:030 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - curved!
5. 00:59:357 (1) - do a soft shade it doesen't fit in the pattern right o3o
6. 01:05:071 (6,1,2) - i would suggest you a pattern like that:
   
   SPOILER

   
   better view:
   

   88,189,65071,2,0,P|111:219|146:235,1,77.999997619629,2|0,0:0|0:0,0:0:0:0:
   280,188,65888,6,0,P|315:203|338:234,1,77.999997619629,2|0,0:0|0:0,0:0:0:0:
   412,280,66500,2,0,P|424:236|412:192,1,77.999997619629
   420,116,67112,1,2,0:0:0:0:

   I'm in love with your mod already.
7. 01:18:949 (1) - i would suggest to use a slider removing 01:20:582 (9) - aswell creating a reverse slider, to give more importance to the vocal starting at 01:18:949 (1) - wich you missed totally
   aaah, yes
8. 01:27:928 (4) - ctrl+g flows better imo true
9. 02:02:214 (3,4) - you could use a softer and bit curved form for this two wich are to straight imo i don't really understand but I hope i fixed it now
10. 02:06:296 (5,6) - example 1 // 02:09:561 (5) - exsample 2 // ecc ecc all kiai section should have a different kind of patter like :
    
    
    would sound a bit better for the vocals and follow the rhythm better as it is atm awww, this is great
11. 02:17:928 - a spinner would be great here imo hmm, the thing is there's already spinner on the next section and I don't know where I should end the spinner if I'm going to follow your suggestion
12. 02:47:112 (1,2,3,4) - flows really bad bcs of 02:47:929 (2,3,4) - wich should go in the other direction imo like this;
    
    SPOILER

    

    232,136,167112,6,0,P|257:164|268:202,1,77.999997619629,2|0,0:0|0:0,0:0:0:0:
    199,266,167929,2,0,P|173:236|163:199,1,77.999997619629,2|0,0:0|0:0,0:0:0:0:
    152,108,168745,1,2,0:0:0:0:
    224,44,169153,1,0,0:0:0:0:
    316,72,169561,1,2,0:0:0:0:
    412,56,169970,1,0,0:0:0:0:

    Aaah, My savior. I'm glad that you're here, Bakally.
13. 02:52:010 (3) - better ctrl+j sure
14. 03:04:255 (2) - for a better flow you should a) make it curvy or b) put the slider more down I'll go with A
15. 03:15:684 (4,1) - not big fan of this kind of overlaps Well, I like this kind of overlaps.
16. 03:23:031 (1) - one again you're stopping the vocal, here should be a slideralright, fixed
17. 03:30:377 (2,3) - sounds a bit wrong try with :suree
    
18. 04:00:174 (3,4) - try with a slider here gives a better look to the pause that you're makingsure
19. 04:19:357 (2,3) - here flows very bad try to improve the flow by following it: fone
    
    SPOILER

    
20. 05:13:235 (3,4,1) - you could use the same pattern as 01:50:786 (1,2,3,1) - would make less confusion aaah, sorry
21. 05:15:684 (5) - curve it for a better flow you like 'em curvy heh ? hehe
22. 05:20:582 (1) - same ^ same
23. 05:32:010 (5,6) - same lke the prev suggestion to add a slider woooo

nice and relaxing map,would double check the timing thought looks like a bit off a bit

Xinely wrote:

General :
(if those already fixed then forgive me, i downloaded this map around 2 days ago)
- http://puu.sh/rWVKv/433855ad63.png
- i guess those files are unused in the sb? http://puu.sh/rWVNI/1d9cc8fafc.png i know nothing about SB files thingy. I'll ask exam

Baper dolo :
- HP harusnya ga lebih besar dari OD jadi swap aja ok beb
- 00:03:847 - whistle? ada suara piano sama vocal e kuat oh iya benar
- 00:10:377 - ^ ^
- 00:32:418 (6,1) - flow sama designnya rada kurang greget beb http://puu.sh/rWW6Y/404469f61d.jpg sip beb
- 00:35:684 (4) - whistle? buat konsisten sama 00:42:214 (5) - oj beb
- 00:39:765 (1,2) - kalo arah slidernya sama dicopas gitu kerasa aneh (banget), cuma di mirror aja beb kek http://puu.sh/rWWdW/779a9cc583.jpg oq sip
- 00:41:398 (4) - 248,184? dari sini ke berikutnya itu kek anti jump atau spacing ancurlah bedanya bisa missread wkwkw emang sengaja kok beb hehe, tapi tak kasih jarak lebih deh biar ga kesadisan
- 00:53:643 (2) - unstack aja? stack rasanya kurang pas menurutku. bisa ditaruh di 36,92 pengen ngasih emphasis kek (3) beb, dari lagunya jga cocok buat distack soalnya kek tiba2 berhenti gitu beb
- 01:06:500 (2,3,4) - snapnya... aaa.. bisa missread kalo hidden imo. coba digedein spacingnya beb yang 01:07:520 (4) - misal ke 228,140 wadoooo
- 01:14:663 - 5%? soalnya yang awal2 kamu mute slider's end nya yg mana beb? ini jga klo aku 5% tiba2 jga bingung apa alasannya
- 01:18:745 (7) - minta dibacok LOL, consistent spacing pls wadooo ga ngeliat wkwk maap
- 01:25:071 (4) - 228,132 pls beb consistent spacing.. sekalian biar blanket sama 01:22:214 (1) - duuh maap, sering kelewatan pas ngecek wkw
- 01:27:112 (3,4) - coba di mirror aja biar flownya lebih enak http://puu.sh/rWWBH/e46bbbff7f.jpg ga beb, klo aku ikutan ntar ke (1) jadi aneh beb trus jga aku bikin kek gini enak buat ngikutin violinnya beb
- 01:56:092 (3) - whistle buat piano? :C sheet
- 01:50:786 (1,2,3) - gua khawatir sama snapnya beneran, ini berasa gak kek 1/8.. rasanya gaje kek antara 1/8 sama 1/12.. nah lu konfirm sama sapa gitu kan temen lu banyak beb udah beb, aku tanya2 ke #modhelp dan BN , ini 1/8 beb. udah di test jga kok pake 1/6 , agak off
- 01:56:908 (4) - remove aja? ga ikut apa2 ini ada kok suara jelas di sini beb wkwk
- 02:05:684 (2) - yaolo 1,2x terus 1,0x spacingnya harus konsisten beb duh kok kek gini yaa spacingnya
- 02:08:949 (2) - gw bantai lu lama2 awkawkwak sadasfasdas
- 02:14:459 - whistle buat piano beb
- 02:16:092 - ^
- 02:27:112 (1) - 02:32:418 (1) - ^ dah add semua whistle beb
- 02:46:500 - add circle beb? pianonya keras disini enak buat triplet wkwk oh iya, sip
- 03:08:337 (5,6) - dibuat lebih simetris beb (bisa main copas) biar kece ga beb, sengaja aku giniin buat ngikutin vocalnnya yg lebih tegas
- 03:12:419 (6) - whistle buat piano? sip beb
- 03:15:684 (4) - 300,108? lah flownya ga lurus beb lol sekalian 03:15:684 (4,1) - avoid overlapnya lebih kan jelek qwqwqwq ok beb, tpi klo overlap aku emang sengaja gituin
- 03:24:255 (2) - remove aja beb? ga ada musiknya qwqwqwq ada beb, itu jelas harpa tebal wkwkw
- 03:30:990 (3) - 220,64? kalo 1/4 triplet getu enaknya linear line gitu beb. kalo naik turun entar mabok /ditabok.. aka ga enak ga beb, aku mau bikin movement unik di sini dan jga ga parah2 amat kok beb
- 03:45:071 (5) - terlalu dempet sama (4) beb jadinya ga moe.. 224,128 aja sip beb
- 03:54:867 (1) - 04:13:643 - whistle buat piano? sip beb
- 04:02:623 (2,3) - overlapnya ga kece :C sengaja dan kece kok beb :<
- 04:16:500 - remove whistlenya biar konsisten sama 04:18:133 - sip beb
- 04:25:888 (3) - 332,180 biar pas di tengah lengkungan 04:26:704 (4) - jadi bikin blanket siaap bb
- 05:07:520 - 20% volumenya? 10% gw denger apa beb ;_; oh iya benar
- 05:13:235 (3,4,5) - sama beb. gw agak ragu sama snappingnya udah beb

nah disini hitsoundnya bisa improve banget. penggunaan whistlenya harus jelas beb berdasarkan vocal's strength atau piano. design nya jg bisa improve lagi sih, tungguin aja modnya nozho ya wkwk makannya gw minta lu nge mod, soalnya kamu pasti hobi benerin HS wkwkw

also i agree that timing feels a bit off. a check timing from pro timer would be nice

Storyboard images must not exceed a width of 1920 pixels and a height of 1200 pixels. The storyboard editor works based on osu! pixels with an internal maximum width of 854 pixels and a height of 480 pixels. If you are using an image bigger than that, you may need to scale accordingly.

Xinely wrote:

01:08:347 (6) - whistle ae? biasa piano ok beb
01:14:061 (3) - maksudnya gw minta 5% aja buat tail (bluetick) nya doang beb soalnya km juga mute 00:04:673 - kek disini. bluetick disana kan ga ada musiknya makanya enakan di mute naah, beb itu di 4:673 beda banget feelnya sama yg ini beb jadi klo di 5% in di sini ga jelas maksudnya apa beb
02:32:428 (1) - yang ini belum dikasih whistle ok beb
03:13:857 - piano disini juga keras, kalo mau bisa dikasih whistle biar keliatan kalo hard diff gitu ga deh beb, keliatan maksa jadinya wkwk
03:24:265 (2) - ingetin gw lain kali kalo ngemod harus headset an awkawkawkwkwkwk

Nozhomi wrote:

Nep-Nep teach me how to Nep-Nep thx Nep-Nep~ Nep Nep

1. 00:29:979 - Overall I think you could emphasis more the vocal with hitsounds by adding more whistles, for example 00:34:673 - / 00:41:000 (3) - (you see where you think vocal could benefit from it) , and even more for 00:56:102 - since the music start to build more tension. done adding more Whistles as you wish
2. 00:45:489 (5,6) - I don't think they deserve to be stack, vocal are quite distinct and should be unstack to fit more vocal here. good point
3. 00:47:122 (2,3) - The song is slow, so I think the flow should stay as you build it, mean clean. This is really to broken and not really pleasant to play imo. Even with a 90° rotation it would already much better. changged it i guess
4. 01:01:816 (4) - I think a lower angle could be much more appreciated for the play and flow. Move it like 420:112. sure think
5. 01:23:449 (2,3) - Imo the spacing should be like 01:25:081 (4,1) - , they have both the same kind of emphasis. Or do it like all other after (01:31:612 (4,1) - and similar). alright
6. 01:50:796 (1,2,3) - I would do this to fit more the violin here https://puu.sh/rZIah/08a3d7db2b.png, also I'm not a huge fan of this last 1/8 slider after the 2 reverses. played less awkward now, i hope
7. 02:17:938 - Why not a spinner here until 02:19:367 - ? Up to you tho really personnal.same reason like Xinely, there's already a spinner next to it and i don't know where to end it if i'm gonna put a spinner on it.
8. 03:22:224 (6,7,1) - I would do a more rounded flow here like https://puu.sh/rZJ5y/5de5d8bba6.png this. okay
9. 03:29:571 (1,2) - Better blanket desu. hope I'm doing it right
10. 03:30:387 (2,3) - This kind of pattern imo ruin the flow since the song is that slow. I propose this solution https://puu.sh/rZJEH/429832dccc.png but if you have better ofc no problem (or want to keep it for x reason). alright, I'm following your suggestion
11. 03:56:510 (3) - I would be ok for this slider end if the next circle was under it, but not on it right. Just do a regular slider pls. done
12. 03:59:367 (2,3) - Stack. dammit
13. 04:02:633 (2,3) - This overlap looks terrible. Find a way to avoid it pls. fixeed
14. 04:25:081 (1) - I would move it to 276:100 to have a sweet flow here. sure
15. 04:28:347 (1,2,3,4) - I would be glad if you keep same spacing for the four of them. done
16. 05:13:245 (3,4,5) - Same as first one ? yep
17. 05:26:306 (6,7) - Spacing because of stacking~ don't really understand, fixed i guess
18. 05:31:408 (2,3,4,5) - I would move all to have 05:31:408 (2) - at 468:76 to don't have a straight and cutted flow. sure

Mukyu~

1. Make a drastic quality improvement on the mapset so we can make a consensus. If I am be fine with the improved one, previous 2 BNs can place a rebubble (and even I might give a nomination depending on the outcome).
2. Found extra 2 BN members who can agree with the current design. According to the new BNG rules, only one of Xinely or Nozhomi would be able to place a rebubble.

1. 01:14:061 (3) - Shouldn't this end at 01:14:469 instead? Since the piano is there and actually I prefer this part 01:14:877 (4,5) to be a slider like 00:47:938 (3) because you can differentiate the piano 01:14:877 (4,5) from the vocals 01:15:694 (1,2,3,4) this way.
2. 01:50:796 (1,1) - I still prefer the rhythm Nozhomi suggested earlier cuz starting the second repeat slider on a yellow tick 01:51:102 is somewhat uncomfortable in gameplay so it would play better to start the second one on 01:51:204 instead. Same applies to 05:13:245 (3,1) .
3. 01:56:102 (3,4) - A slider instead of these would support vocal better, like what you did with 04:00:183 (3) - 05:18:551 (4) .
4. 02:39:367 (5) - I don't think there's anything here, I suggest either replace 02:38:959 (4,5,6) with a 1/1 slider or remove 02:39:367 (5) .
5. 02:58:551 - Didn't hear anything here either a 1/1 slider instead of 02:58:143 (3,4) would play better imo.
6. 03:32:836 (1,2) - Why not a 1/2 slider and make it the same pattern as 03:33:653 (3,4) cuz you did it with 03:26:306 (1,2,3) though?
7. 03:45:081 (5,2) - Uh looks cramped visually, I know you're maintaining DS but can you space it(visually) like 03:43:857 (3,4) ?
8. 05:27:122 (1,2,3) - Huh why didn't you do 3 circles thingy to follow vocal like 05:30:387 (1,2,3,4,5) ?
9. 05:49:979 - A slider here would introduce the new section better imo.

Sonnyc wrote:

Ani.
00:29:979 (2,3) - The sound of (3) is pretty constant with the following beat of 00:31:612 (4,5). Why is it containing a jump? It doesn't feels to fitting the song nicely imo. A small jump at 00:33:245 (1) worked since there was a strong beat to support it, but that usage was quite questionable.mmh, i feel like this little jump is fine as it is since the emphasizing between it is kinda clear enough for a bit jump. But oh well
00:38:959 - Since this is containing a similar spacing with 00:38:143 (4,1), mind adding a whistle to make a consistent setting? sure
00:43:040 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - The base spacing you were using at the previous section such as 00:30:796 (3,4,5,6) - 00:36:510 (1,2,3) was 1.2x. Why did it suddenly increased to 1.4x while there wasn't any sudden change in the music? right, changed the 1.2x part into 1.4x.
00:46:306 (1,2,3) - The placement of these sliders aren't visually stable enough. Although it is following ds 2.1x, forget about it and take a look at the actual placement. The actual distance between each object isn't visually the same, causin a less balanced placement. Temporarily ctrl+Ging (2) and checking the distance snapping will help you get this idea. there you go
00:55:694 (3) - I can get this sound is different with (1,2) since it contains an actual vocal while the other two doesn't. But since the overall feeling is the same, and since even you have grouped as the same combo, wouldn't using a same volume be the better? hmm, how's 15% sound?
00:56:102 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - Similar opinion about the base spacing. Actually this change was more understandable because there was a notable musical change. However since the changed setting towards 1.5x wasn't persisted until similar parts like 01:02:632 (1,2,3,4) but rather converting back to 1.2x, I couldn't actually feel some structure here. aaaa, changed it all into 1.4.x
01:07:122 (3,4,5,6) - Seems you wanted (4,5,6) divided from the previous patterns, and guess that was why the current spacing was set. But it doesn't feel ever enough. The spacing change was done only by 0.2x to give some visually notable change. Also the angles were the all same all along, so I couldn't get any difference being actually expressed towards their. It rather felt like a failed distance snapping. Actually, 01:39:775 (3,4,5,6) worked better.done
01:15:694 (1,2,3,4,5) - It maybe playable, but considering you haven't used such concepts before, it just felt way too sudden to appear this part of the music. did a bit change at this
01:22:224 (1,2,3) - What is this minor spacing? (Actually it isn't minor at all but whatever) You have been using a consistent spacing for 01:28:755 (1,2,3) which has a similar music. Such inconsistency feels really weak in structure. uuuhh
01:41:816 (1,2,3,4) - Not sure if this is intended but according to your pattern, (4) is highly detached from (1,2,3). (2) was a 5 degree rotated form of (1), and (3) was a 15 degree rotated form of (2). (huh? Why is this even inconsistent) A similar rotation angle formed a rotation pattern of (1,2,3) themselves. However (4) was rotated by 180 degree, and that made (4) just out from the rotation pattern. Since (1,2,3,4) was pretty much consistent enough in the song, having such different expression was highly doubtful. If it was because of the shortage of the playfield, you should've designed a pattern that wouldn't cause such irregular setting from the first place. I was out of space to create this, well i did something about it

Stopped modding here.

Popped. I don't think I can feel any quality features in this map unfortunately. The structure of the map is pretty weak as I said some specific spots in the mod line. I also couldn't feel much technical skills in this map. Most objects were just being placed according to the distance snapping, or some flow-wise not bad spots but not showing any technically high patterns. The most pattern-liked objects were 00:20:184 (1,2) - 01:09:163 (1,2,3,4) so far. Most other parts were.. I don't even know what is going on here.

Here are the following options that you can think of:

1. Make a drastic quality improvement on the mapset so we can make a consensus. If I am be fine with the improved one, previous 2 BNs can place a rebubble (and even I might give a nomination depending on the outcome).
2. Found extra 2 BN members who can agree with the current design. According to the new BNG rules, only one of Xinely or Nozhomi would be able to place a rebubble.

Electoz wrote:

[Ani]

1. 01:14:061 (3) - Shouldn't this end at 01:14:469 instead? Since the piano is there and actually I prefer this part 01:14:877 (4,5) to be a slider like 00:47:938 (3) because you can differentiate the piano 01:14:877 (4,5) from the vocals 01:15:694 (1,2,3,4) this way. alright, if you say so , but i keep 4 and 5 as it is since i really want to click something at it
2. 01:50:796 (1,1) - I still prefer the rhythm Nozhomi suggested earlier cuz starting the second repeat slider on a yellow tick 01:51:102 is somewhat uncomfortable in gameplay so it would play better to start the second one on 01:51:204 instead. Same applies to 05:13:245 (3,1) . aah, yes. done
3. 01:56:102 (3,4) - A slider instead of these would support vocal better, like what you did with 04:00:183 (3) - 05:18:551 (4) . alright
4. 02:39:367 (5) - I don't think there's anything here, I suggest either replace 02:38:959 (4,5,6) with a 1/1 slider or remove 02:39:367 (5) .removed 5 instead
5. 02:58:551 - Didn't hear anything here either a 1/1 slider instead of 02:58:143 (3,4) would play better imo. agreed
6. 03:32:836 (1,2) - Why not a 1/2 slider and make it the same pattern as 03:33:653 (3,4) cuz you did it with 03:26:306 (1,2,3) though? true
7. 03:45:081 (5,2) - Uh looks cramped visually, I know you're maintaining DS but can you space it(visually) like 03:43:857 (3,4) ? sure
8. 05:27:122 (1,2,3) - Huh why didn't you do 3 circles thingy to follow vocal like 05:30:387 (1,2,3,4,5) ? just a bit of variety, it's the last kiai afterall
9. 05:49:979 - A slider here would introduce the new section better imo. naaah, I'm trying to follow the first part.

I would like to see a reply on both Sonnyc's and mine as well. I would like to see how situation goes and I still think this mapset can be improved more, so I'm not going to rebubble for now.

1. 01:38:551 (1,2) - A 1/1 slider instead of these would fit better cuz 01:38:959 isn't mapped on anything, or you could use this rhythm instead if you want to follow the vocal.
2. 01:46:306 - Remove whistle? Since this is not clickable unlike 01:46:714 (4,5,6,7,1,2,3,4,5) so those circles would be more emphasized if you remove whistle on this one.
3. 05:54:061 - 06:00:592 - Use 5% volume on slidertail like what you did with 00:04:673 - 00:11:204 ?
4. 00:21:816 - 06:11:204 - Could've used the same volume from green line since the rhythm on these places are pretty much similar.

Electoz wrote:

I'lll recheck later, placeholder.

[Ani]

1. 01:38:551 (1,2) - A 1/1 slider instead of these would fit better cuz 01:38:959 isn't mapped on anything, or you could use this rhythm instead if you want to follow the vocal. took the 2nd choice instead.
2. 01:46:306 - Remove whistle? Since this is not clickable unlike 01:46:714 (4,5,6,7,1,2,3,4,5) so those circles would be more emphasized if you remove whistle on this one. naaah, Even though this isn't clickable the sound on red is quite strong.
3. 05:54:061 - 06:00:592 - Use 5% volume on slidertail like what you did with 00:04:673 - 00:11:204 ? right
4. 00:21:816 - 06:11:204 - Could've used the same volume from green line since the rhythm on these places are pretty much similar sure.

Poke me via discord when you're ready.