Denkishiki Karen Ongaku Shuudan - Natsu no Owari (Soleily Re

posted
Total Posts
20
show more
Topic Starter
Lasse

Pentori wrote:

conclusion
00:31:731 (2) - 01:49:902 (2) - deserves a drum sampset too for faster kicks yes
00:35:074 (2,1,1) - feels a bit underwhelming spacing wise, was pretty much able to hover over the next object without slider breaking. should probably try for a stronger entrance to kiai increased spacing to 00:35:674 (1) - , other one is fine since it's rather low intensity before
00:46:302 (1,2,3,4,1) - only time you have spaced streams like this, should probably try use these more consistently in more places 01:08:245 (1,2,3,4,1) - etc. or just remove the only outlier true, reduced this
01:17:159 (3,3) - snares still sound prevalent here, so claps could work sure
01:56:931 (2,1,2,3,4,5) - personally find this a bit hard to read compared to everything else // the perfect overlap + starting next stream under 01:56:588 (1) seems still okay to me, but I reduced the overlapping at start of the stream a bit
02:05:159 (1,2) - kick slider puts most of the emphasis on 02:05:331 (2) . maybe skipping the vocal here and using a longer slider would work better I actually think together with the noticeable sv changes and low spacing to 2 it makes the cymbal on the kickslider stand out nicely o:

hard
02:04:817 (1,2) - swap ncs here? for finish changed comboing here a bit

easy
01:01:731 - 02:19:902 - sections like these have really awkward rhythm prioritisation imo, specifically forcing 3/2 offbeat rhythms when the music still has dominant snares on white ticks just seems too confusing for noobs I tried a snare focused rhythm again now (I had that at first) but it doesn't really seem better to me since there are these really dominant kicks right before and like this you at least get consistent 3/2 gaps, whereas the other one mixed 1/1 + 2/1. it's more the problem that mapping these parts without 1/2 will suck either way lol

poke again whenever

thanks!
Pentori
top diff
00:46:302 (4,5,6,7) - missing hitsounds
Topic Starter
Lasse
fixed
Pentori
owo
ShirohaMyMommy
I'm pretty sure the romanised title should've been Natsu no Owari (blabla remix thing), 終焉 indeed read as Shuuen but in this case it's a phonetic equivalent that doesn't exist in japanese language thus neither Shuenri/Shuuenri is correct. kind of hard to prove any source but since I've never heard of Shuenri/Shuuenri in my japanese life the current title sounds really weird.

I'm just passing by so just call pentori back when it's fixed
Topic Starter
Lasse
blame google translate (it always worked fine so far for me lol)

Owari also makes more sense with the lyrics so 👀

fixed, thanks Delis!
Pentori
shuenri
Doormat
hey there

[Easy]
  1. 01:03:959 (2) - 01:06:702 (2) - 02:22:131 (2) - 02:24:874 (2) - 02:39:959 (3) - 02:42:702 (3) - 02:45:445 (3) - 02:50:931 (3) - 02:53:674 (3) - 02:56:417 (3) - could try making these 1/2 sliders, but if you feel 1/2 is too short then don't worry about it
  2. 01:49:217 (3) - while this is where the vocals for this word start, i feel it'd be more appropriate to have this circle on the white tick on 01:49:388 - where the beat is more pronounced
  3. 02:04:817 (1) - would probably be better as a circle + 2/1 slider for the cymbal emphasis on 02:05:159 -


normal is fine

[Hard]
  1. 00:32:245 (1,2) - would be neat to see rhythm here match 00:31:559 (1,2,3) - to emphasize buildup but not really that necessary
  2. 00:34:817 (3) - tbh i think two circles would work more effectively than a slider; it sounds more like the sound on 00:34:988 - is separate from the one on 00:34:817 -


[Insane]
  1. 00:42:359 (2,1) - 02:00:531 (2,1) - kind of worried about reading here, since part of the slider body for (1) is partially obstructed by the (2), unlike your other cases 00:47:845 (2,1) - 00:50:588 (2,1) - 00:50:759 (1,1) - where only the slider end is stacked but the rest of the slider body is still very visible
  2. 02:37:388 (7) - going to skip the sound on 02:37:474 - ? feels kind of odd to me


[Conclusion]
  1. 00:32:074 (4) - feels kind of odd to use a 1/4 slider here when 00:32:759 (4) - 00:33:445 (4) - don't use one despite being very similar in composition/phrasing. also occurs at 01:50:245 (4) -


neat set, call me whenever you're ready
Topic Starter
Lasse

Doormat wrote:

hey there

[Easy]
  1. 01:03:959 (2) - 01:06:702 (2) - 02:22:131 (2) - 02:24:874 (2) - 02:39:959 (3) - 02:42:702 (3) - 02:45:445 (3) - 02:50:931 (3) - 02:53:674 (3) - 02:56:417 (3) - could try making these 1/2 sliders, but if you feel 1/2 is too short then don't worry about it yea I really dislike 1/2 sliders on easies and also didn't map that sound on 01:05:502 - consistent 3/2 gaps should also be really straight forward to play
  2. 01:49:217 (3) - while this is where the vocals for this word start, i feel it'd be more appropriate to have this circle on the white tick on 01:49:388 - where the beat is more pronounced seems really weird to me and 1/2 - 3/2 is easier to comprehend than other way imo
  3. 02:04:817 (1) - would probably be better as a circle + 2/1 slider for the cymbal emphasis on 02:05:159 - applied


normal is fine

[Hard]
  1. 00:32:245 (1,2) - would be neat to see rhythm here match 00:31:559 (1,2,3) - to emphasize buildup but not really that necessary no 1/2 vocals here so I want to differentiate from 00:33:274 (2,3) - and 00:31:902 (2,3) -
  2. 00:34:817 (3) - tbh i think two circles would work more effectively than a slider; it sounds more like the sound on 00:34:988 - is separate from the one on 00:34:817 - sliders here are mainly for polarity stuff while keeping tapping on the more outstanding sounds, I think that would make it really weird to play suddenly


[Insane]
  1. 00:42:359 (2,1) - 02:00:531 (2,1) - kind of worried about reading here, since part of the slider body for (1) is partially obstructed by the (2), unlike your other cases 00:47:845 (2,1) - 00:50:588 (2,1) - 00:50:759 (1,1) - where only the slider end is stacked but the rest of the slider body is still very visible think they are fine since it's only the last bit of a 1/1 slider which will give enough time to react
  2. 02:37:388 (7) - going to skip the sound on 02:37:474 - ? feels kind of odd to me fixed


[Conclusion]
  1. 00:32:074 (4) - feels kind of odd to use a 1/4 slider here when 00:32:759 (4) - 00:33:445 (4) - don't use one despite being very similar in composition/phrasing. also occurs at 01:50:245 (4) - yea, changed


neat set, call me whenever you're ready

thanks!
also made 02:41:502 (6,1,2) - on top diff a bit easier to read
Doormat

Pentori wrote:

shuenri
Okoratu

Lasse wrote:

original version of this remix is appoval length, but I removed the gross hardstyle part that ruined the whole song...
disgusting opinion
gratz lol
Topic Starter
Lasse
:(
Sotarks
this song without hardstyle looks like it removes all the variety and interest of this song, looks like tipical dnb song
Please sign in to reply.

New reply