1. Easy (1,02 stars, 173 notes)
2. Hard (3,35 stars, 550 notes)
3. Insane (4,37 stars, 697 notes)
4. Normal (2,23 stars, 412 notes)

KittyAdventure wrote:

Welcome back, The Legendary Indonesian Mapper!

CucumberCuc wrote:

Hallo
#modreqsM4M

02:24:796 - 02:41:426 add kiai? Hmm, I'll leave this as is as 00:32:296 (1) doesn't have a kiai~

[Easy]
00:14:687 (1,2) maybe do slightly are close for better distance? Hmm, they're equally spaced already though o.o
00:32:948 (2,3) check distance I've checked this without the Grid Snap on this one and the distance here is indeed wrong, thanks for mentioning~
00:42:405 (2) end slider move slightly left for better flow? Yes, that'll do
01:13:057 (3,1,2,3) - 01:40:774 (1,2,3,4) - 02:46:970 (3,1,2,3) - 02:50:883 (3,1,2,3) - 03:18:600 (1,2,3,4) i think this circles can change on slider because I think that for beginners will be a difficult to press the 4 circles in a row Yes, I'm aware of this, but this is meant for variation actually. I'll leave this as is for now (:

[Normal]
00:33:274 (3,4,1) check distance
00:36:209 (1,2) ^
00:49:252 (4,1) slightly far
01:07:350 (6,1) slightly far
and still there during kiai you have some objects a different distance, can make them the same?
02:34:905 (4,1,2) do the same distance?
02:39:144 (4,1,2) ^ Eh... I've checked them all (including the kiai) and they all are perfectly following the Distance Snap here hehe - the only part on this map that I made intentionally not to obey the Distance Snap here is 01:37:839 (3,4) to emphasize the stacking (the difference is barely noticeable anyway) but I tweaked some of them~

[Hard]
as for me look clear

[Insane]
00:10:611 (7) move left? Actually it was the (6) which should be slightly moved right hehe, thanks for mentioning though :3
00:13:709 strange moment when 00:13:709 (4,1) stack and 00:14:035 (5,2) overlap (5,2) is actually not noticeable at all during playthrough (due to (5) already fading out) hehe - I moved (4) slightly to the right though so that the stack would (hopefully) look more natural xD
00:31:644 (6,8) - 00:31:807 (7,9) make them similar in distance? Hmm, I get what you mean here but to get the pinpoint equal distance here would take a lot of effort orz D:
00:54:796 (4,6) before anything similar was not, you can certainly it leave, but it might still stack? This manual stacking here is very much intentional

Josh123uaJ wrote:

Ayy from my q.

Easy:
00:56:752 (3) - Don't let this touch the hit meter. Happens again at 02:39:470 (1) Actually there's nothing in the Ranking Criteria that forbids it hehe, it should be very much fine as long as the object doesn't get off-screen~

SPOILER

01:37:187 (1,2,3) - Make these straight. (3) looks a little off. Fixed
01:58:383 (1) - I'm not a big fan of such a sharp angle right before a reverse arrow in this slider. Straighten it out a little. Yeah, after some consideration I do think that this slider's shape would be familiar for beginners so I made this into a simpler shape instead :3
03:31:644 (1) - Make this slider end to the last white tick just like your other difficulties. Nice catch, fixed!

Normal:
01:05:557 (1,2,3,4,5) - I think it's better if you make it a perfect pentagon. Not quite sure but I hope the pentagon's better now~

Hard:
01:34:905 (1,2,3,4,5) - Move (5) just a little bit to the left so that the slider heads form a perfect pentagon. Okay
02:08:328 (1,2,3,4) - The slider head of (4) could be made closer to (3) so a better diamond shape could form. Yep, fixed

Insane:
Looks clear

I enjoyed this map. All I can suggest is small aesthetic changes. GL

Cherry Blossom wrote:

Modding Niva's map, **Achievement unlocked**
still awesome hitsounding and an unique style ;w; Thank you!

Easy

1. 00:12:731 (1,2) - i'm not that fan of this kind of flow in easy, because i consider that everything should be smooth and simple to play in easy diffs. This motion is not that smooth because 00:12:731 (1) - 's curve and direction is the opposite of 00:13:709 (2) - which makes the player plays a reversed "W" motion with a circle. Using that kind of motion with sliders is fine as long as everything is built around it as you did. It's better to keep doing this like this 00:04:905 (1,2,3) - . You're free to keep it because it is still playable by beginners, but i would not do that in my maps. Mirrored this slider's direction, should be fine now
2. 01:40:774 (1,2,3,4) - this motion might be a little difficult to handle for beginners especially with circles, the transition between 01:39:796 (3,1) - looks a little harsh, and it would be better if you move 01:40:774 (1,2,3,4) - a little on the right to make this motion smoother. i could say the same thing with 02:37:513 (1,2,3,4) - Both are intentional, actually (I'm aiming more for the aesthetics here). I tweaked the first one's path a bit, though~
3. 01:51:861 (3) - it's just an impression, but this tick 01:52:513 - should be clicked because the note on it is really strong and introduces the most strong part of this section and it doesn't really give the best impression when it is just followed by a sliderend. Ah, yes, I've given a lot of thought about this while mapping this actually. I want to put an object there but to do this means that I have to end this slider 1/2 earlier, which doesn't fit the rest of the map at all (since the rest of the map doesn't even have a 1/2 anywhere) and above that there are no other feasible rhythm that I can snap this slider's end into so I thought snapping the slider end there would be the best option here o.o
4. 02:43:383 (1) - i'd reverse its curve for a smoother motion, but the current one is fine. Decided to lessen the curve's intensity instead (:
5. 03:04:905 (1,2,3,4,1) - i don't really know what you wanted to do here, but visually this could be improved, i mean the curve can be better if you move 03:06:861 (1) - upward It's intentional, it's not meant to be a curve but rather a linear v-shape :3

Normal

1. 00:58:709 (3,4,1) - for visual, it would be nice if they are aligned because there is currently and angle between them that make this pattern not that polished, compared to what you did earlier with straight objects like 00:53:818 (1,2,3) - or 00:48:600 (2,3,4) - I want to make them arranged in a straight line but I'm running out of playspace here unfortunately ._.
2. 02:23:165 (3,1,2,3) - this is the kind of flow or pattern i haven't seen in the map and it looks a little weird because compared to structured patterns you did earlier, this current on looks a little ou of place. The player will be attracted by this circle 02:23:818 (1) - and he wont play the whole slider 02:23:165 (3) - , so it would be better if you move 02:23:818 (1,2,3) - a little on the left to make this flow smoother. Fixed

Hard

1. 00:27:731 (4,5,1) - i see that you increase progressively the distance between each objects but when playing, it feel like 00:28:057 (5,1) - is an antijump because of the angle. You make the player plays the whole sliders here 00:27:405 (3,4,5) -, but the player doesn't have to play the whole slider (5) to hit 00:28:383 (1) -. And this appears like an antijump when the distance is supposed to be higher if you see what i mean. Consider making 00:28:057 (5,1) - played with a straight flow like you did for 00:27:405 (3,4) - , if you intention is to show that the distance between objects is increasing progressively. That's not the intention, but I see your point here - I've put (1) a bit further though so that the anti-jump would be less obvious~
2. 01:39:144 (2) - it would be nice if you keep the same distance, so 2.5x (the distance after it is 2.27) Ah, I've never thought of it while mapping it (I simply went for the aesthetics here) but I've moved (2) more to the left here, hopefully the distance here would be more even
3. 02:39:144 (5,1,2) - this current flow between these objects is a little unnaturally to play and much aiming skills is required to handle 02:39:470 (1,2) - . You play a shape with 02:38:491 (3,4,5) - and then 02:39:470 (1,2) - and the transition between them is a straight line but an irregular distance, which is in my opinion a little difficult to handle. A solution to make this pattern more comfortable to play is to make an angle between them like this : (it reduces the stress) I decided to CTRL + G (2) instead (which has the same effect to build the angle, more or less) and tweaked something around here
   
   SPOILER

   
4. 03:00:991 (1,2,3) - the difference concerning spacing is noticeable, it would be nice to fix it. Eh, the spacing's correct already actually :
   
   SPOILER

   

Insane

1. 00:24:144 (7,8,1) - this staight flow which is not straight triggers me a little, the gameplay is not really affected but it would be nice to make things perfectly straight for visuals :3 Hmm, although I see your point the idea here from the very beginning is very much to let (1) be in contact with (4,5,6) o.o
2. 01:24:959 (7,2) - Avoiding this overlap would make the pattern better for visuals. Changed the direction of the stream here, I hope it works well with the next accelerated spacing pattern as well (:
3. 01:43:709 (6,7,8,9,1) - I'd rather see 3 1/2 sliders here because there are 3 same notes (which would be on each sliderstart) in a row with the same intensity. 3 sliders would give a better contrast according to what you put before (a jump pattern with circles). The current pattern works well because the circle 01:44:198 (7) - makes this 01:44:361 (8,9,1) - played strongly, but imo the song suggests more 3 sliders than the current pattern. You did the same thing with sliders here 01:50:557 (1,2,3,4) - for example. Indeed, changed these into 3 1/2 sliders

I spent more time than expected when modding, maybe because i like this map ;w;
Good luck ~

P.S : You should map Käfig /me runs Interesting song, although I personally still liked Atropos more :3

• General

1. Insane od seems a bit low (maybe just me) I suggest at least 8
2. I don't believe Widescreen support should be on all difficulties

• Insane

1. 00:15:013 (2) - imo this would flow a bit better if it was rotate -11 (selection centre) and move it back (some slight adjustments if you do this)
2. 00:31:318 (3) - for this note - being that it is a bit stronger and have a larger impact with the finish - I felt that it should had more spacing (oh course it would need adjustment to notes after this if you move it)\
3. 01:31:318 (2,3,4,5) - can't speak much of this - not affecting much gameplay wise but this did felt a bit cramp compare to everything else in this kiai (probably just me but I figure it was worth mentioning at least)
4. 01:45:339 - don't see the why you ignore this note - thought it was a bit strange when you could do something like this which still fits with the kiai imo
   I understand if you don't do it though
   

• Hard

1. 01:26:752 (6) - This is offscreen by Aimod
   Didn't actually find anything else

• Normal

1. 00:17:296 (2) - move this a little like maybe X:441 Y:321 to flow just a bit better
2. 01:06:535 (4,5,6) - imo this is a little complex for an Normal - a new player could easily end up pressing (6) instead of (5) which will trip them up and miss a combo the way it is arrange and this is more of something I would see in an advanced difficulty - ya did it differently here 02:44:361 (4,5,6,1) - which is much easier to read for an new player imo

Hailie wrote:

So much for doing it in the morning >.> - M4M from #modreq (i'll post link to shinitai-chan if the mod isn't too short)

i'lll edit this post later so...

Placeholder

EDIT: K most of this is really minor
Here the link to the map (you don't have to mod much since my mod is probably useless): https://osu.ppy.sh/s/519318 Eh, it's fine :3

• General

1. Insane od seems a bit low (maybe just me) I suggest at least 8 Hmm, I cranked the OD and HP up to 7.5 instead as I didn't want it to be -that- challenging here hehe xD
2. I don't believe Widescreen support should be on all difficulties Disabled widescreen support

• Insane

1. 00:15:013 (2) - imo this would flow a bit better if it was rotate -11 (selection centre) and move it back (some slight adjustments if you do this) Hmm, the (6,1,2) altogether are already perfectly separated away by 120° actually...
2. 00:31:318 (3) - for this note - being that it is a bit stronger and have a larger impact with the finish - I felt that it should had more spacing (oh course it would need adjustment to notes after this if you move it)\ Moved this note one grid to the bottom left, not much that I can do here unfortunately D:
3. 01:31:318 (2,3,4,5) - can't speak much of this - not affecting much gameplay wise but this did felt a bit cramp compare to everything else in this kiai (probably just me but I figure it was worth mentioning at least) Made the (3) and (5) a bit more spacious here
4. 01:45:339 - don't see the why you ignore this note - thought it was a bit strange when you could do something like this which still fits with the kiai imo
   I understand if you don't do it though It's very much intentional (I'm following the drums here), as I already did elsewhere (01:29:198 (2), 03:22:676 (2), etc)~
   

• Hard

1. 01:26:752 (6) - This is offscreen by Aimod ...oh, didn't notice this really, thank you very much for pointing this out
   Didn't actually find anything else

• Normal

1. 00:17:296 (2) - move this a little like maybe X:441 Y:321 to flow just a bit better Moved
2. 01:06:535 (4,5,6) - imo this is a little complex for an Normal - a new player could easily end up pressing (6) instead of (5) which will trip them up and miss a combo the way it is arrange and this is more of something I would see in an advanced difficulty - ya did it differently here 02:44:361 (4,5,6,1) - which is much easier to read for an new player imo Leaving this as is for now - I personally don't really think that this is something that is overly complex though, plus because of the AR 5.5 here (not AR 4/5) the (4) has already fully disappeared when the (1) appears actually :3

This was all I found and I hope it was useful in some form (Forgive poor grammar - I type really quick) It's fine (:

GL - Cool map

Okorin wrote:

i suggest od 8 for the insane, it's not very challenging to get decent levels of accuracy on maps this straightforward for modern players as you may think I know, I got several pro players to playtest the Insane back then (such as Zetera and smh). Changed the OD to 8 though as this isn't the first time this issue is mentioned (Hailie previously has mentioned the same issue as well hehe)

maybe flip the bg so that the main painting piece - that tree - isnt hidden beneath the song selection menu as much as it is currently? Eh... I've tried this and it feels weird in the eye imo (perhaps it's because from left to right it goes from darker -> lighter instead of the opposite, I don't really know)

preview of the song sounds better if you dont have the heavy drum section included and just the harmonic melody if you set it to something like 01:23:145 - Ah, but it sounds cooler this way personally imo o.o

[insane]
01:02:948 (6,7) - stack are broken Yep, fixed
00:15:991 (9,10) - 01:29:850 (3,4,5,6) - 01:45:502 (3,4,5,6,7) - 02:00:339 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - 02:08:818 (6) - 02:59:035 (1,2,3,4) - 03:15:665 (1,2,3,4) - 03:30:991 (4) - hitsounding and rhythm that you have the player click is so conflicting in these places. Hitsounding and the way the music contrasts everything else in the song would suggest that your mapping should reflect that with more circles to click but instead you opt to just have the hitsounds represent those Hmm, I always intended to follow what would be the most prominent instrument over the song - most of the time it goes with the melodies, but when the percussion goes more prominent I went out with it with continuing whistles on every distinguishable melodic instrument actually...
03:30:176 (6) - probably just circles works better than introducing something new just in the last pattern because you dont do this anywhere Fixed
02:29:361 (6,7,1) - the way autostacking works kind of breakes the aesthetic of this pattern Hmm, I can't really think of any good pattern to fix this issue though... nvm, fixed with your suggestion below (:

[hard]
00:00:992 - to 00:15:665 - should have waaaay less space in comparison to the rest of the map currently it feels out of pace to frist play calm as hell section to then change into playing the section that actually does stuff with barely changing spacing or percieved gameplay
intro could be less dense and less spaced Altered the opening sequence's DS to 1.4, although this took quite some time it should be fine now~
01:30:502 (6,1) - overlap is barely visible together and makes the pattern look a tad clunky i guess lol Changed the order of (1) and (2), there won't be any more obvious visible overlap during gameplay I hope xD

[normal]
set tickrate to 1? you dont have enough rhythm density here to make the constant ticking sound not-distracting Alright
ar could as well be 6 As it'll help the players to read some stacks such as 01:06:861 (4,5,1) I don't see why not~

02:44:687 (5,6,1) - 01:05:557 (1,2,3,4,5,6,1,2,3) - these are more intense to play than most of the stuff that you do in the chorus of the map, contrasts heavily with how calm the song is in this place and i dont think that fits too well, would suggest simplifying rhythm more for these Umm, the three 1/2s are very much intentional actually as the song very much calls for it there. As for the rhythm I tried to simplify 01:05:883 (2,3) into a slider (to reduce the amount of circles there) but I can't really say I'm very pleased with the new pattern - I hope it works fine for others, though :3

[easy]
set tickrate to 1? you dont have enough rhythm density here to make the constant ticking sound not-distracting Yep~
that everything ovleraps will probably make the diff a ton of times harder to actually read properly for someone just starting out with the game. it also makes everything feel unnecessarily cluttered. i think going with higher spacing in general as well as a bit higher slidervelocity to avoid this would help a lot
right now this diff is probably harder to interpret than the normal and i think that's not at all what you're aiming for owhat you want to aim for with this difficulty I'll give my thoughs on this on a separate post

if you do this you will notice that the rhythm and the diff will start to feel like a normal, because that's what this diff pretty much is - a simplistic normal that was squashed together a bit

would consider nominating if the easy becomes an actual easy i think currently it's harder to play and read than the normal which is probably not what you want to have lol

Delis wrote:

I modded the top 2 diffs this morning, wafu seems to be gonna check and might qualify it too so I would stay for a backup I guess o.o... Thank you very much!!
[General]
what I would like to mention apart from oko is the orgel parts can have lower volumes at all the sliderslide sound and whistles are kinda loud which doesn't feel great when you just wanna play the beautiful orgel Lowered the volume on the calm parts (parts without drums) from 60% to 50% - the idea's great but I don't really think I can do quieter than this because the contrast's not that big imo hehe~
[Insane]
00:38:328 (2) - perhaps give this a different spacing from 00:37:839 (7,8,9,1) - since you usually do a spacing magic to emphasize the snare sound such as 00:44:361 (2,3) -. there's one more section that I could find out that it's using a equivalent spacing 00:46:481 (3,4,5,6,7) - though this seems pretty fine as is because the finish is on 00:46:970 (4) - but on 00:38:002 (8,9,1) - just only 1/4 hi hats which don't really impact a lot, https://delisha.s-ul.eu/I7x0hQrY anti-jump like this one would be enough to represent the music properly, yet fitting to your style I think. The original idea here is to put (8) in the middle of the (6,7,2) triangle obviously, but I'm changing it anyway as I'm fine with this as well (:
02:06:046 (6,7) - might wanna have normal sample on these for the drums. 02:02:214 (11) - is also something that I would like to place a normal sample even if the music doesn't really support for the single sound, it helps players playing triplets more consistently. Added Normal sampleset to (6) and (11) here (my bad, I missed this one out >_<) - I decided to keep (7) as is though if you don't mind as (if applied) it will be inconsistent with what I've done previously in 00:20:394 (6,7,1), 00:28:220 (6,7,1), and other similar parts...
02:17:296 (5) - would go with simpler shape this feels so out of place lol Deleted the 1st slider node here, should be better now. I'd personally like to keep the second half as is though as it fits with the song's sounds and (1)'s shape if you don't mind by the way hehe (:
01:56:100 (5) - missing whistle maybe, apply in all diffs btw Ah, this one's intentional actually, I'm following the pipe (?) sound on that part and as you can hear the pipe doesn't present at that note

[Hard]
set the stack leniency to 7? complete stack might be not the best for some newer dudes and also could help 02:00:013 (5,1) - etc since you had no space to manual stack it but having stack leniency at 7 does auto stack it so you can still keep the logic with those manual stacks. Done

Saturnalize wrote:

https://youtu.be/rq7DIvYPTdQ?t=30s the ambient tho :thinking:

anyway

normal hitnormal for triplet such as 00:40:040 (8) - can have a lower volume (30/40% should do the trick) to give more of a smooth kick plets rather than linear strong one right now Actually from the song itself the volume is somewhat level as well on every kick, so I think the 50% as it stands now already represents this effect quite well without sounding too contrasting compared to other drum sounds~

hard
---
00:54:796 (4) - to prevent higher stacking, put this to 58,170 and the next one around 62,175 Oh this is actually a nice one, did what you suggested here
01:24:144 (4) - fix curve w Done w
01:33:926 (4) - Just to keep that back and forth-like movement, ctrl+h and reposition ...did you mean CTRL + G? I liked the idea though, changed this part
01:53:491 (4) - is placed almost directly below the end, resulting in an unpredictable note. I think it's perfectly readable as is, besides the Stack Leniency of 7 that Delis suggested earlier already increases the readability of this stack here
03:30:502 (2) - clap Whoops, fixed (:

normal
---
01:39:796 (3) - curve point is a bit too far from the center, 281,111 would fix Done
01:42:731 (1,2,3,4,5) - https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/9452304 yo meet fixed neat star shape https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/9452312 (curve rotated by 7deg, star is using straight 1 end and 2, rotate 72 all the way I suppose you know this trick already) Decided to fix them manually instead... Hopefully it's better now :3

easy
---
I agree with some people who said that this diff is too dense. Just by looking at it makes me feel veeeeeeeeeery crowded. Yes, I'll be embedding my thoughts below
00:16:644 (1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2,3,1,2,1,2,1,2,1) - Even in easy diff there should be a spreading movement. Just by selecting these notes, you can see that it's staying on one side of the monitor.
01:51:861 (3) - curve point 278,345 to make the curve more balanced and complement the next notes with arc-y movement Done
01:54:470 (1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2,3,1,2,1,2,1,2,1) - again, spread more broad movement rather than stuck in one side of the monitor Regarding this (and 00:16:644 (1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2,3,1,2,1,2,1,2,1) - as well), I'm very much aware of it but I don't think I can really do anything over there considering that's the most plausible rhythm of choice (repeating 3/2 slider -> circle -> repeating 3/2 slider -> circle -> etc) and that rhythm doesn't really allow spatial flexibility in all fairness :3

mostly minor stuffs since I'm used with your mapping ideology so ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

Perklone wrote:

as requested by Niva

i don't think Easy should have variative DS, but maybe i'm just outdated. so i'm going to mod thinking that DS now can be variative on Easy. Indeed it is in most cases, but this falls under the "clearly different from spacing used for different rhythms" written in the RC. I used this spacing pattern as for me using 0.8x for 1/2 feels too cramped - the way the 0.8x and 1.0x-s are used are very much consistent and intuitive/beginner-friendly though so it shouldn't be a problem xD

00:14:687 (3) - looks bad tbh, a quick way to fix it is to CTRL+H it This is intentional. There are many places in which I applied this kind of flow as well actually, such as in 01:28:057 (2) - where I curved it to the direction opposite of (1) instead of following (1)'s direction~

00:28:383 (1) - this slider looks janky and out of place imo Added a slight curve on it, should be better now hopefully
00:32:296 - i know it's an easy, but this undermapping is hurting me Yes this is intentional as it also follows the 1/1 tick~
00:45:991 (2) - flow feels kinda extreme here Reduced (3)'s height
00:56:752 (2) - slider looks kinda out of place, how about making some fancy slider like this? It's intentional as this slider shape could bring the flow from the previous (1) while keeping the linearity with the next (3,1). I adjusted the angle on this one though~
01:01:644 (2) - same issue as 00:22:513 Yet again this is intentional. I adjusted the curvature so it'll hopefully more equal to (3) now for a better flow though (:
01:03:926 - this feels undermapped too
01:07:513 - ^ Regarding these two I don't really think it's wise to put a barrage of sliders for beginners there, so I put on a break there with a circle (:
01:23:165 - doing this kind of undermap on a kiai especially feels wrong. T_T Turned this into a slider to suit the other kiai's beginnings
01:29:687 - since you're using the next white tick for slider, why not use a circle here? it's nice for emphasis The idea here is to emphasize the following drums actually hehe xD
01:46:970 - empty rhythm that could be used Hmm, it's not mapped elsewhere though (01:30:991 (1) -, 03:24:470 (1) -, etc) o.o
01:34:905 (1) - could blanket with here 01:32:948 (3) - flow's better too Hmm, I get the idea, but in order to blanket this I have to make (3)'s curve similar to 03:00:991 (1,2) though, in which it just simply don't give a good flow with the previous 01:30:991 (1,2) - here ._.
02:06:209 (1) - wave slider going vertical looks weeeeiirdd Yet again this is intentional. I made this slider less wavy though so that it would (hopefully) flow more naturally here~


03:30:665 - could fill this rhythm, kinda empty for a high intensity sounds Hmm, yes, this would be nice as there are no drum sequences following it

02:14:035 (1) - 02:31:644 (2) - 00:22:513 (2,3,1) - 02:39:470 (2,3) - and for some others
although it's not really breaking the RC, the positioning of this patterns feels weird to look and play, i know it will be hard to change some of this, i'm just saying just to be safe, it's better too change it See below.

even though there's a few bad spot here and there, overall this map is solidly made, with nice geometry and cool flow Talked to Perklone himself via IRC, and since the "bad spots" you're mentioning are referring to "objects that are placed close to the edge" than it shouldn't be a problem at all really - the RC only states that "hit objects must never be off-screen" (not "hit objects should stay near the center") so as long as it stays in the playfield it should be fine xD

good luck~ Thank you!

Kasuga wrote:

WELCOME BACK NIVA

Also some modding for you as per request

Easy

tbh, I can't point anything in here, looks so clean for me, I envy you that you can make a beautiful Easy diff like this.
But here have some suggestion, may this help you

01:03:600 (1,1) - give a break between these two points, maybe? This song and this diff si relaxing, this will improve the enjoyment of the song in my opinion. Also, as a newbie I want some break too when playing long duration beatmap

02:10:122 (1,1) - same as above

02:41:426 (1,1) - same as above Hmm, I see what you're suggesting here, but since the other diffs have that part mapped into it I don't really think leaving the Easy with a break would be the best idea there. I do managed to give some part a more relaxing and less rigid flow though (by using sliders and such), most notably on the 02:12:078 xD

That's all from me
GOOD LUCK

1. I know this might sound very nitpicky, but I think you should be saving as much space as possible in your maps if it can be done without loss. In your case, it's the background. If you really want to use this one, go ahead although it doesn't look well thanks to being so small. But don't resize a file that is 900x453 to 1920x1080, you're making an 80 KB file have 880 KB with even lower quality than the small one. Please, use the original or a completely different image. Don't ever upscale (except for maybe waifu2x action).
2. This is a bit similar to above, your soft-hitclap12 is ~900 ms long, while it doesn't need to. The volume it is used at is 50%, so essentially anything after ~300 ms won't be audible, not even talking about the fact that music is covering it too. Also, you by no means need to use 32bit wave files (and never should, you will probably not get in contact with a file that's recorded for that, ever, unless you buy it). It's not obligation, but I highly recommend you to use this instead, chopped down to 1/6th of the size.
3. The widescreen support could be consistent, but not really important, up to you.
4. I personally think all the difficulties should end at 03:32:785 - instead. 03:32:622 - sounds way too early, 03:32:948 - sounds way too late, but the arpeggio seems to really end at 03:32:785 - as there's no sound after that.
5. I'm pretty sure the offset is quite off. It probably should be about +10ms or so. You can easily notice that the hitsound at 01:23:655 - can be heard first and then the drum in the song, but other instruments can also be noticed quite easily.

1. 00:00:992 - You can't use inherited point on top of timing point with different settings. You can only change SV. Change the timing point's sampleset to Soft Custom 72. Could cause some issues (for example here, it's not clear which sampleset to use, although game picks one).
2. Does the increased tick rate serve any purpose? I don't see any need for that, it only increases the combo in my eyes. It could "fit" in the kiai, but you don't really hear it, in other parts, it sounds quite redundant. So as long as you don't use tick hitsounds or don't manipulate volume of them, I don't think this should be here.
3. 03:31:644 - Could have the default soft hitsounds, using a clap and the whistle that it already has. You can notice the song has a very noticeable clap in it, so I thought it might be worth emphasizing the only one that seems to be here, to make it a bit more interesting. Applies to other difficulties too.

1. Some objects could avoid touching the HP bar quite easily, up to you, minor issue. 00:22:513 (1) - 00:28:383 (1) - 01:19:252 (1) -

1. 03:31:644 (4) - Could easily avoid touching the HP bar, again, completely up to you.
2. 01:44:035 (4) - A clap is definitely missing based on your hitsounding structure and how you follow song by hitsounds.
3. 01:45:502 - Same as above.
4. 03:21:861 - Same as above.
5. 03:23:328 - Same as above.
6. 03:30:665 - Same as above.
7. 03:30:991 - Same as above.
8. 00:05:883 - Missing whistle (you have it in other difficulties)
9. I think the map is missing many clap hitsounds (not like you just forgot them as the above listed, but that it could just have more). I know you like to follow the accordion, but maybe at least places like 01:24:470 - could have a tiny snare on the slider ticks? It's up to you, I just felt it sounded a bit empty hitsound-wise when following the accordion.

1. 00:05:883 - Missing whistle
2. I would suggest the same thing with slider ticks as on normal. Except in this case, there are virtually no clap hitsounds, which feels even more weird. It wouldn't be an issue because the map simply doesn't allow you to do that, but at least the ticks could improve this situation. (if you make them, they don't have to be loud, and no, they won't confuse players if they don't stand out too much)

Wafu wrote:

[General]

1. I know this might sound very nitpicky, but I think you should be saving as much space as possible in your maps if it can be done without loss. In your case, it's the background. If you really want to use this one, go ahead although it doesn't look well thanks to being so small. But don't resize a file that is 900x453 to 1920x1080, you're making an 80 KB file have 880 KB with even lower quality than the small one. Please, use the original or a completely different image. Don't ever upscale (except for maybe waifu2x action).
   
   I think I understand the issue here - the current BG is indeed based on the image's original resolution (3100 x 1560) which actually was being downscaled to 1920 x 1080. It's just when I did this in Photoshop seems like I accidentally set the .jpg quality to 12 (Maximum), hence the large file size :3
   
   Things should be good now, though.
   .
2. This is a bit similar to above, your soft-hitclap12 is ~900 ms long, while it doesn't need to. The volume it is used at is 50%, so essentially anything after ~300 ms won't be audible, not even talking about the fact that music is covering it too. Also, you by no means need to use 32bit wave files (and never should, you will probably not get in contact with a file that's recorded for that, ever, unless you buy it). It's not obligation, but I highly recommend you to use this instead, chopped down to 1/6th of the size.
   
   Eh, the link's broken when I tried to open it unfortunately o.o...
   
   I've tried doing this manually in Audacity but oddly enough the file size didn't reduce (312 KB -> 312 KB) even after I trimmed the ending part, so I'll be leaving this as is~
   .
3. The widescreen support could be consistent, but not really important, up to you. Yeah, forgot to remove the Widescreen Support on Easy
4. I personally think all the difficulties should end at 03:32:785 - instead. 03:32:622 - sounds way too early, 03:32:948 - sounds way too late, but the arpeggio seems to really end at 03:32:785 - as there's no sound after that. Decided to end this on the next white tick instead following the current Easy diff's end
5. I'm pretty sure the offset is quite off. It probably should be about +10ms or so. You can easily notice that the hitsound at 01:23:655 - can be heard first and then the drum in the song, but other instruments can also be noticed quite easily. Fixed!

[Insane]

1. 00:00:992 - You can't use inherited point on top of timing point with different settings. You can only change SV. Change the timing point's sampleset to Soft Custom 72. Could cause some issues (for example here, it's not clear which sampleset to use, although game picks one). Fixed
2. Does the increased tick rate serve any purpose? I don't see any need for that, it only increases the combo in my eyes. It could "fit" in the kiai, but you don't really hear it, in other parts, it sounds quite redundant. So as long as you don't use tick hitsounds or don't manipulate volume of them, I don't think this should be here. Hmm, yes, there are many faint snares (even outside the kiai, on 00:58:393 - for example) in which the Tick Rate 2 would blend nicely into~
3. 03:31:644 - Could have the default soft hitsounds, using a clap and the whistle that it already has. You can notice the song has a very noticeable clap in it, so I thought it might be worth emphasizing the only one that seems to be here, to make it a bit more interesting. Applies to other difficulties too. Used Sampleset : Drum + Addition : Soft instead, the default Clap just feels to strong here in my opinion...

[Hard]

1. Some objects could avoid touching the HP bar quite easily, up to you, minor issue. 00:22:513 (1) - 00:28:383 (1) - 01:19:252 (1) - Moved the last two lower, should be better now (I don't know how to move the 1st one from its current position, though xD)

[Normal]

1. 03:31:644 (4) - Could easily avoid touching the HP bar, again, completely up to you. Redesigned this slider in order to make it end in the next white tick, should be fine now
2. 01:44:035 (4) - A clap is definitely missing based on your hitsounding structure and how you follow song by hitsounds. Fixed
3. 01:45:502 - Same as above. This is intentional actually
4. 03:21:861 - Same as above. Fixed
5. 03:23:328 - Same as above. This one's also intentional
6. 03:30:665 - Same as above.
7. 03:30:991 - Same as above. Changed into clap + Sampleset : Normal for these two
   
   Regarding the "claps", the idea here is actually not to over-saturate the mentioned parts with claps as the mapping is very much following the accordion (while the accordion sounds fall on the white tick and many of the claps actually fall on the red tick). This is why on some parts that you mentioned, such as 01:45:502 -, a Sampleset : Normal has been positioned there instead of a Clap as using Clap there would feel out of place due to there are no red tick claps nearby :3
   
   .
8. 00:05:883 - Missing whistle (you have it in other difficulties) Fixed
9. I think the map is missing many clap hitsounds (not like you just forgot them as the above listed, but that it could just have more). I know you like to follow the accordion, but maybe at least places like 01:24:470 - could have a tiny snare on the slider ticks? It's up to you, I just felt it sounded a bit empty hitsound-wise when following the accordion. I think I'll leave this as is though, I'm not really a fan of slidertick hitsounds o.o

[Easy]

1. 00:05:883 - Missing whistle Fixed
2. I would suggest the same thing with slider ticks as on normal. Except in this case, there are virtually no clap hitsounds, which feels even more weird. It wouldn't be an issue because the map simply doesn't allow you to do that, but at least the ticks could improve this situation. (if you make them, they don't have to be loud, and no, they won't confuse players if they don't stand out too much) Yeah, once again due to the nature of the percussion here basically the 1/1 and 2/1 rhythm don't fall at any clap at all except for one object. I guess I'll leave this as is as well though, I think the current hitsounding works fine as is and that adding claps in the sliderticks wouldn't really fit the current rhythm >_<

Generally a very nice mapset, would like to see this ranked. Also, welcome back! Thank you~

Niva wrote:

[*]This is a bit similar to above, your soft-hitclap12 is ~900 ms long, while it doesn't need to. The volume it is used at is 50%, so essentially anything after ~300 ms won't be audible, not even talking about the fact that music is covering it too. Also, you by no means need to use 32bit wave files (and never should, you will probably not get in contact with a file that's recorded for that, ever, unless you buy it). It's not obligation, but I highly recommend you to use this instead, chopped down to 1/6th of the size.

Eh, the link's broken when I tried to open it unfortunately o.o...

I've tried doing this manually in Audacity but oddly enough the file size didn't reduce (312 KB -> 312 KB) even after I trimmed the ending part, so I'll be leaving this as is~
.

Wafu wrote:

Niva wrote:

[*]This is a bit similar to above, your soft-hitclap12 is ~900 ms long, while it doesn't need to. The volume it is used at is 50%, so essentially anything after ~300 ms won't be audible, not even talking about the fact that music is covering it too. Also, you by no means need to use 32bit wave files (and never should, you will probably not get in contact with a file that's recorded for that, ever, unless you buy it). It's not obligation, but I highly recommend you to use this instead, chopped down to 1/6th of the size.

Eh, the link's broken when I tried to open it unfortunately o.o...

I've tried doing this manually in Audacity but oddly enough the file size didn't reduce (312 KB -> 312 KB) even after I trimmed the ending part, so I'll be leaving this as is~
.

Oops, not sure why the link got corrupted. This should work though.

1. 00:17:958 (4) - Jumps are okay, but this one is a bit forced for me. Everything flows better if you add Ctrl+G here and jump to 00:18:284 (5) - is kept.
   It's a personal suggestion, but I think it's a good one.
2. 00:24:317 (8) - The pattern looks a bit unclean because you forced the stack here. Spacing between notes is broken and I really felt like it was a straight line and suddenly it wasn't. Try to move (1) further or just do something else.
3. 03:27:415 (7) - Jump pattern was cool until I've seen this. They are not really touching, but it doesn't look clean at least for me, try to fix spacing here.

1. Looks cool.

1. 00:09:480 (2) - Actually this note should be up due to the flow movement that sliders have.

1. Nothing to say here neither.

Nyukai wrote:

~Insane~

1. 00:17:958 (4) - Jumps are okay, but this one is a bit forced for me. Everything flows better if you add Ctrl+G here and jump to 00:18:284 (5) - is kept. Hmm, I get your idea here but I think I want to keep this as is >w<
   It's a personal suggestion, but I think it's a good one.
2. 00:24:317 (8) - The pattern looks a bit unclean because you forced the stack here. Spacing between notes is broken and I really felt like it was a straight line and suddenly it wasn't. Try to move (1) further or just do something else. Moved the (7) instead to create an arc :3
3. 03:27:415 (7) - Jump pattern was cool until I've seen this. They are not really touching, but it doesn't look clean at least for me, try to fix spacing here. Made these four sparser here

~Hard~

1. Looks cool.

~Normal~

1. 00:09:480 (2) - Actually this note should be up due to the flow movement that sliders have. Fixed~

~Easy~

1. Nothing to say here neither.

I'm sorry I couldn't say so much, you did a good job here