Thank you very much!Yamicchi wrote:
Sorry for the delay, finally got some times here
[Easy]
• You have a conflict source here. What the heck? That's not what it is in the Beatmap listing. Okay, fixed.
• 00:59:793 (2) - Bad blanket here tho Fixed.
• 01:02:263 (2) - Not a big deal but the touching sliderend feels bad. Maybe you could adjust it a bit I can't seem to find anything wrong with it.
• 01:08:087 (3) - You strictly followed the vocal here, but why not 01:09:675 (1) - here? It should start on 01:09:498 - if you know what I mean I guess I thought it'd be easier, but no, you're right. By fixing this, though, I'll have to fix every other instance of it, which I will do. If you bring it up later, I'll just pass it over.
• 02:03:322 (1) - Same thing here, and the other few mores after this Ah. These are easy to fix, so no biggie.
• 01:26:616 (1) - You should use less anchor here. Firstly when you do that, the shape would look like a glitch, even while playing you can notice that. Isn't this enough? http://puu.sh/wgCJu/128fba895b.jpg I have a bad intuition with spiral shapes and beziers. I didn't know excess anchors cause errors; I reduced it.
• 02:08:793 (1) - This slider looks messy tho. The 02:07:557 (3) - didn't fully fade away but this slider faded in already. I'd recommend a new pattern tho The overlap was intentional. However, it isn't as symmetrical as it could be, so I fixed that.
• 02:23:793 (2) - Imo this slider flows better http://puu.sh/wgCQo/63ccd0370f.jpg All of the sliders in the guitar solo are bent. I made it more symmetrical, though.
• 02:42:851 (1,2,3) - This is a dangerous pattern tho. Mostly players might not notice (2) and skip it to click 3, because that's where the flow is going. Ctrl + G (1) is a better choice tho Fixed, thank you.
• 03:21:675 (3) - No stack with 03:19:204 (4) - ? Fixed, thank you.
[Normal]
• 00:03:146 (3) - I'd use the same shape with 00:01:910 (1) - for better aesthetics tho Done, thank you
• 00:05:969 (3) - I highly not recommended this since players at this diff could not read it properly, so they hardly know if it's 1/2 or 1/1 or even 1/4? Overlapping might be a better idea than stack, like 00:11:087 (3,4) - this Fixed.
• 00:20:432 - imo the hitfinish sounds weird, maybe remove it? If you're using it to represent the vocal then you should not Done, I thought I had gotten rid of it earlier.
• 00:23:793 (4) - If you're following the vocal, then what does this slider represent for? I think just a circle would be enough I had it there to reflect the blooming piano after the voice receded, however, I think your suggestion is better for this difficulty is better.
• 01:01:028 (1) - the sliderend is not properly stacked. Wat du hek? I don't even remember intending to stack this. Fixed.
• 01:25:734 (5) - Same goes, and you should check if there is still more Huh, good eye.
[Insane]
• 00:01:557 (4,5,6,7) - these even have higher spacing than 01:54:146 (3,4,5,6,7,8) - altho the second stream is stronger? You might wanna reduce it I increased the spacing on the second stream. The stream length is reflective of the drumroll length.
• 00:03:146 (1) - You're increasing spacing for this but not 00:03:851 (3) - this? My justification for this is the symmetry in the pattern: the melody is the same rhythmically for both sliders so I wanted to express that through a symmetrical slider pattern.
• Ye those are just small examples for the awkward spacing I found in your map
• 00:51:851 (3,1) - These should be a 1/1 slider tho. The gap in between feels empty 1/1 slider would cover up the lyrics that I want to map to. The double overlap is a recurring motif in both Insane and Extra, and it effectively reflects the song, so I don't see a reason to eliminate it. 1/1 gaps separated by circles aren't that bad.
• 00:53:087 (4,5,6) - hmm what about this? http://puu.sh/wgDKf/5c832b6563.jpg Makes sense. Fixed.
• 01:42:146 (5,5) - Nc for these are fine tho. 10 might be too much No change yet, but I'll mull this over. I've intentionally had the combo continue for two measures for my own reasons: namely that it compartmentalizes the bridge into two dominant, similar lines. But it may be a bit unconventional, so I don't know.
• 01:54:146 (3) - Why does this have 0.78x spacing while others are 0.71? Fixed.
• 02:05:969 (1) - You didn't stack this at 01:01:028 (1) - so why did you do here? Oh, fine. I modified the earlier one to make it stack.
It was a lot more work than I had expected.
• 03:16:557 (1,3,5) - These feels weird tho. they don't really express the song with those slider shape Okay, since so many people have risen concerns, I'll change it. I didn't find anything wrong with it, but I'm a complacent man.