What exactly do you expect from your reply? Let me just quote some lines:Lasse wrote:
there was never an actual reply to p/5947741 by the mapper
also @Bubblun: this is not how vetos are supposed to be handled anymore, see https://osu.ppy.sh/help/wiki/People/Bea ... atmap_Veto
we are still in the process of mediating old vetos and put this one on higher priority now, please wait until it has been discussed
"where? the blue tick? I don't think so " -> but he explained it? -> keeping the veto up even though it's been discussed already? logic behind that?
"it actually holds "extra" value by devaluing your other big jumps mapped to much more significant beats" -> but he explained it? -> ^
"doesn't make any sense to me but whatever" -> what does he even want to reply to that anymore?
"simplifying 3/4 rhythms on a 185bpm 7* map, nice. as above this doesn't represent the song at all" -> why would you only give him once choice, I thought we're out of the age where you force subjective points like this on a mapper. he thinks it's representative, so why can't you accept that?
"maybe reconsider your whole spacing concept then" -> same - what does he want to reply to that?
This is not how vetos should work. How comes this veto is considered still standing, even though there are valid explanations as to why this map works like it's intended to work?