lets take a look see, I more just check for playability
[notice]
CtB CollabXinely00:09:165 (3) - This piano could use some more emphasis here, could ctrl-g + move right.
00:16:391 (1,2) - These really don't flow together, making it 100% straight might work better
01:24:087 (8,1) - edge dash
01:33:040 (1,3) - hyper at x=less than 16 is against guidelines, fix those
01:26:757 (1) - For this part, reverse flow hypers are used on quiet sounds, and follows slider body on strong sounds. The jump at 01:27:699 (4,1) - breaks this though, change flow a bit. imo i’d just ctrl-h the pattern after
01:29:270 (1,2) - Spacing too large here for soft sound
01:37:752 (5,6) - smaller spacing here despite higher pitch sound
02:33:040 (5,6) - spacing kinda small here
02:33:982 (3,4) - spacing too large
04:26:443 (1) - to 04:28:642 (4) - this is pretty much the same pattern, mix up
04:29:427 (4,5) - edge dashy
04:30:998 (4,5,6) - using hypers with different distances changes the speed, which plays weird. also reminder to make sure to move hypers away to x16/496 here too
04:35:003 (5) - move right easier to catch without stopping
04:36:338 (6) - reduce spacing, little unexpected
04:40:893 (3,4) - ^
04:44:977 (7) - this stream could really use change, stopping + walking to catch really isn’t fun
Neonat00:40:580 (2,3) - Reduce spacing a bit
00:47:961 (2,3) - imo 3 should be a little closer, since the tail is farther away + harder to reach than normal
00:50:317 (6) - This could really use a hyperdash
01:43:092 (1) - Increase movement here, unexpected for a stronger sound here to have less movement.
01:47:804 (1) - weird flow, use something like this instead
01:54:087 (9,1) - spacing too large
01:57:228 (4,5) - ^
02:00:684 (1) - just replace with 4x repeat instead
01:58:014 (8,1,6,7) - bit of inconsistency with patterns, can you reduce spacing on second
05:16:548 (3,1) - 1/4s + antiflow is overdoing it,
05:19:061 (6,1) - edge dash, remove
hey not bad tbh
Spec00:30:213 (1) - This could use more emphasis
00:52:359 (4,5,6) - Not sure if three hypers are fine here considering they’re unmapped in some other places, fairly inconsistent.
00:59:113 (1,2,3,4) - This curve could probably be made cleaner
00:59:977 (6) - sounds a bit odd not to map the snare here
04:25:501 (2,4) - would be much easier to follow if these were on the same cooridinate, or further so they’re different
CLSW03:26:129 (1) - this section’s sv is really high, especially since it was before a slow section. would it be possible to lower it a bit?
03:42:464 (1) - might be a bit much to introduce both direction change for sliders on the edges and in the middle. Might be better if the middle pattern changed direction after each one, so it’s less sudden.
05:11:914 (4,5) - can you reduce these by a little
05:28:642 (3,4,1) - reduce 4,1 a bit since you decrease SV in the last two sliders
05:34:768 (2,1) - nerf the hypers at least a bit, nothing changed from the previous section at all
05:44:349 (1) - increase the SV to 1.3x or 1.4x here, would make this pattern easier.
Mingnot going to bother with your parts much because reject + it’s my style, but
02:52:987 (5) - ctrl-g dash is kinda big after hyper
03:02:569 (2) - really missing out on the 1/3s here
03:46:234 (1) - fundamentally, there’s nothing wrong here, it just gets kinda boring to play vertical sliders through the whole thing
04:47:176 (3,1) - Can you adjust these so that the droplets are easier to catch, just move them out a bit
again, this section gets really repetitive with non stop copy paste + ctrl-h, is there really nothing that can be done to make it fun to play while keeping your style? Not everything in that section would need a hyper