hey so we just voted the son of a dictator as president and a ton of corrupt politicians so I was wondering what countries I should escape to.
forum
Best country to migrate from philippines?
posted
Total Posts
35
Topic Starter
north korea
you can try swimming to australia
Go to Mars.
You need a lot of money and a passport too before you can do that
Same lines I heard from three years ago, most are from those elitist minors/brats who cant even afford a passport. It's also their supporter's fault why Leni lost, they're seriously toxic af
Not registered so didn't vote, but can confirm that their way of campaigning is really bad. Negative campaigning results to negative result. I saw a lot of videos showing their supporters degrading people who doesn't have the same views as themFhaye wrote:
Same lines I heard from three years ago, most are from those elitist minors/brats who cant even afford a passport. It's also their supporter's fault why Leni lost, they're seriously toxic af
If they did it in a better way, Robredo could have won
i also need answer for this
China
Guaranteed that you get picked up by some human traffickers within hours
Guaranteed that you get picked up by some human traffickers within hours
atlantis
This is proof why democracy isn't the best form of government. Many people are stupid and are easily swayed by propaganda when ignorance plays.
china
Yo Bruno Mars has his own country now?YyottaCat wrote:
Go to Mars.
France
democracy is great when it's not rigged
:3c:Corne2Plum3 wrote:
France
the cons is just that u might get enslavedShinRun wrote:
China
Guaranteed that you get picked up by some human traffickers within hours
Its better than having some king ruleJulian_Kaiser wrote:
This is proof why democracy isn't the best form of government. Many people are stupid and are easily swayed by propaganda when ignorance plays.
I'm pretty sure there were toxic people on both Leni and BBM's side (the other candidates are really silent) but yeah I agree, the way they campaigned where they treat her as some saviour instead of some normal presidential candidate probably turned off a lot of people.Scyla wrote:
Not registered so didn't vote, but can confirm that their way of campaigning is really bad. Negative campaigning results to negative result. I saw a lot of videos showing their supporters degrading people who doesn't have the same views as themFhaye wrote:
Same lines I heard from three years ago, most are from those elitist minors/brats who cant even afford a passport. It's also their supporter's fault why Leni lost, they're seriously toxic af
If they did it in a better way, Robredo could have won
oh wowYhuan Debeste wrote:
I'm pretty sure there were toxic people on both Leni and BBM's side (the other candidates are really silent) but yeah I agree, the way they campaigned where they treat her as some saviour instead of some normal presidential candidate probably turned off a lot of people.Scyla wrote:
Not registered so didn't vote, but can confirm that their way of campaigning is really bad. Negative campaigning results to negative result. I saw a lot of videos showing their supporters degrading people who doesn't have the same views as themFhaye wrote:
Same lines I heard from three years ago, most are from those elitist minors/brats who cant even afford a passport. It's also their supporter's fault why Leni lost, they're seriously toxic af
If they did it in a better way, Robredo could have won
i think there is a clear comparison to (i think you get it, ask if you don't)
On the other hand, Bhutan seems to be doing well. Their citizens don't want to remove their king and they live under low poverty as rates decrease. Bhutan has 0 homeless people. Their monarchy is no problem and neither does it need to be removed.Manishh wrote:
Its better than having some king ruleJulian_Kaiser wrote:
This is proof why democracy isn't the best form of government. Many people are stupid and are easily swayed by propaganda when ignorance plays.
Of course while suddenly proposing a monarchy in any of the democracies at such a time wouldn't be an optimal route either.
north koreaJulian_Kaiser wrote:
On the other hand, Bhutan seems to be doing well. Their citizens don't want to remove their king and they live under low poverty as rates decrease. Bhutan has 0 homeless people. Their monarchy is no problem and neither does it need to be removed.Manishh wrote:
Its better than having some king ruleJulian_Kaiser wrote:
This is proof why democracy isn't the best form of government. Many people are stupid and are easily swayed by propaganda when ignorance plays.
Of course while suddenly proposing a monarchy in any of the democracies at such a time wouldn't be an optimal route either.
i wish determining how good a government is is as easy as looking at the country's poverty (or lack there of). i wish.Julian_Kaiser wrote:
On the other hand, Bhutan seems to be doing well. Their citizens don't want to remove their king and they live under low poverty as rates decrease. Bhutan has 0 homeless people. Their monarchy is no problem and neither does it need to be removed.Manishh wrote:
Its better than having some king ruleJulian_Kaiser wrote:
This is proof why democracy isn't the best form of government. Many people are stupid and are easily swayed by propaganda when ignorance plays.
Of course while suddenly proposing a monarchy in any of the democracies at such a time wouldn't be an optimal route either.
Topic Starter
I believe that bbm's misinformation campaign also heavily influenced the people's votes for their preferred president, causing them to lean towards voting bbm and not leni. But even so, I am still disappointed that people chose the worst candidate for president, as even a quick browse through google on the marcos family would immediately prove that They're not fit to lead the country.Yhuan Debeste wrote:
I'm pretty sure there were toxic people on both Leni and BBM's side (the other candidates are really silent) but yeah I agree, the way they campaigned where they treat her as some saviour instead of some normal presidential candidate probably turned off a lot of people.Scyla wrote:
Not registered so didn't vote, but can confirm that their way of campaigning is really bad. Negative campaigning results to negative result. I saw a lot of videos showing their supporters degrading people who doesn't have the same views as themFhaye wrote:
Same lines I heard from three years ago, most are from those elitist minors/brats who cant even afford a passport. It's also their supporter's fault why Leni lost, they're seriously toxic af
If they did it in a better way, Robredo could have won
That is no monarchy. I wouldn't even call it modern.Manishh wrote:
north koreaJulian_Kaiser wrote:
On the other hand, Bhutan seems to be doing well. Their citizens don't want to remove their king and they live under low poverty as rates decrease. Bhutan has 0 homeless people. Their monarchy is no problem and neither does it need to be removed.Manishh wrote:
Its better than having some king ruleJulian_Kaiser wrote:
This is proof why democracy isn't the best form of government. Many people are stupid and are easily swayed by propaganda when ignorance plays.
Of course while suddenly proposing a monarchy in any of the democracies at such a time wouldn't be an optimal route either.
Still, it can be used as an indicator of how well a government treats it's economy.ClevelandsMyBro wrote:
i wish determining how good a government is is as easy as looking at the country's poverty (or lack there of). i wish.Julian_Kaiser wrote:
On the other hand, Bhutan seems to be doing well. Their citizens don't want to remove their king and they live under low poverty as rates decrease. Bhutan has 0 homeless people. Their monarchy is no problem and neither does it need to be removed.Manishh wrote:
Its better than having some king ruleJulian_Kaiser wrote:
This is proof why democracy isn't the best form of government. Many people are stupid and are easily swayed by propaganda when ignorance plays.
Of course while suddenly proposing a monarchy in any of the democracies at such a time wouldn't be an optimal route either.
On the other hand you can pretend to have a monarchy in a democracy by voting the same guy and his descendantsJulian_Kaiser wrote:
On the other hand, Bhutan seems to be doing well. Their citizens don't want to remove their king and they live under low poverty as rates decrease. Bhutan has 0 homeless people. Their monarchy is no problem and neither does it need to be removed.Manishh wrote:
Its better than having some king ruleJulian_Kaiser wrote:
This is proof why democracy isn't the best form of government. Many people are stupid and are easily swayed by propaganda when ignorance plays.
Of course while suddenly proposing a monarchy in any of the democracies at such a time wouldn't be an optimal route either.
And centralising absolute power to theabraker wrote:
On the other hand you can pretend to have a monarchy in a democracy by voting the same guy and his descendantsJulian_Kaiser wrote:
On the other hand, Bhutan seems to be doing well. Their citizens don't want to remove their king and they live under low poverty as rates decrease. Bhutan has 0 homeless people. Their monarchy is no problem and neither does it need to be removed.Manishh wrote:
Its better than having some king ruleJulian_Kaiser wrote:
This is proof why democracy isn't the best form of government. Many people are stupid and are easily swayed by propaganda when ignorance plays.
Of course while suddenly proposing a monarchy in any of the democracies at such a time wouldn't be an optimal route either.
going to say that this is trump-level bad (not i actually looked them up)Stomiks wrote:
I believe that bbm's misinformation campaign also heavily influenced the people's votes for their preferred president, causing them to lean towards voting bbm and not leni. But even so, I am still disappointed that people chose the worst candidate for president, as even a quick browse through google on the marcos family would immediately prove that They're not fit to lead the country.Yhuan Debeste wrote:
I'm pretty sure there were toxic people on both Leni and BBM's side (the other candidates are really silent) but yeah I agree, the way they campaigned where they treat her as some saviour instead of some normal presidential candidate probably turned off a lot of people.Scyla wrote:
Not registered so didn't vote, but can confirm that their way of campaigning is really bad. Negative campaigning results to negative result. I saw a lot of videos showing their supporters degrading people who doesn't have the same views as themFhaye wrote:
Same lines I heard from three years ago, most are from those elitist minors/brats who cant even afford a passport. It's also their supporter's fault why Leni lost, they're seriously toxic af
If they did it in a better way, Robredo could have won
Kidnap the traffickers -> Get caught in jail -> Live the rest of your life with free food and waterCerno wrote:
the cons is just that u might get enslavedShinRun wrote:
China
Guaranteed that you get picked up by some human traffickers within hours