Dank_Memez_101 wrote:

Polyspora wrote:

ghoulybits wrote:

I feel like a lot of people read the "mapping contest" part of the title and not the "OT" part lol

something I was thinking about too, I'm reading some names I never read before here, but its alright I guess

its not about having a qualified judge, rules that make total sense or being like any other contest you saw somewhere in the forums, its about being a OT thing, I wont invite some random that knows about mapping just because he knows about mapping, but I'll invite abraker because he is fucking abraker the locker and everyone knows him and likes him.

I wont bar names I never saw before because they can be future denizens, but one thing that its getting on my nerves is new people comparing this to another contest that they saw/participated

please dont invite your friend just because it bares real value prices. Invite your friend if you think he is cool and understandable enough to just have some fun with us.

My man ur trying to run a mapping contest without a single mapper. Ur doing it for fun but ur formatting it like a formal mapping contests so why are you surprised it's being compared.

And the fact that ur calling this a mapping contest is getting a bit on my nerves too since this isn't really even that since the actual quality mapping is probably not going to determine the actual winner.

I get for fun but if ur gonna do something informal at least make it aparent because the forum post came off more as a "I don't know what I'm doing"

And maybe not call it a mapping contest or at least explicitly state its not supposed to be taken seriously

Dank_Memez_101 wrote:

Polyspora wrote:

ghoulybits wrote:

I feel like a lot of people read the "mapping contest" part of the title and not the "OT" part lol

something I was thinking about too, I'm reading some names I never read before here, but its alright I guess

its not about having a qualified judge, rules that make total sense or being like any other contest you saw somewhere in the forums, its about being a OT thing, I wont invite some random that knows about mapping just because he knows about mapping, but I'll invite abraker because he is fucking abraker the locker and everyone knows him and likes him.

I wont bar names I never saw before because they can be future denizens, but one thing that its getting on my nerves is new people comparing this to another contest that they saw/participated

please dont invite your friend just because it bares real value prices. Invite your friend if you think he is cool and understandable enough to just have some fun with us.

My man ur trying to run a mapping contest without a single mapper. Ur doing it for fun but ur formatting it like a formal mapping contests so why are you surprised it's being compared.

And the fact that ur calling this a mapping contest is getting a bit on my nerves too since this isn't really even that since the actual quality mapping is probably not going to determine the actual winner.

I get for fun but if ur gonna do something informal at least make it aparent because the forum post came off more as a "I don't know what I'm doing"

And maybe not call it a mapping contest or at least explicitly state its not supposed to be taken seriously

Stomiks wrote:

I already hate this

Why'd it took me 2 hours to make 8 seconds of my map

Stomiks wrote:

I already hate this

Why'd it took me 2 hours to make 8 seconds of my map

JustABeginner wrote:

Stomiks wrote:

I already hate this

Why'd it took me 2 hours to make 8 seconds of my map

It took me more than a week and I still haven't start the intro.

octowave wrote:

i'm making a circle-only map bc i think it would be funny

eblf2013 wrote:

What a terrible moment for not having earphones lmao.

Can one map without even listening? :thenk:

Ah, yeah, it's OT.

WitherMite wrote:

ah yes, the reason I never finish a map, I always just nitpick the things I've already mapped instead of mapping more of the song.

Cerno wrote:

WitherMite wrote:

ah yes, the reason I never finish a map, I always just nitpick the things I've already mapped instead of mapping more of the song.

spends 30 minutes deciding a slider shape

Stomiks wrote:

Cerno wrote:

WitherMite wrote:

ah yes, the reason I never finish a map, I always just nitpick the things I've already mapped instead of mapping more of the song.

spends 30 minutes deciding a slider shape

I keep trying to even out the spacing too much

Cerno wrote:

Stomiks wrote:

Cerno wrote:

WitherMite wrote:

ah yes, the reason I never finish a map, I always just nitpick the things I've already mapped instead of mapping more of the song.

spends 30 minutes deciding a slider shape

I keep trying to even out the spacing too much

i mean u dont have to nitpick it too much, it's not like ur gonna rank it

abraker wrote:

Tsunku - Shoot-'Em-Up [Invasion]
A fun and creative little circle-only reading map. It is set up such that you have to listen to the rhythm and then tap the circles. The catch? Low AR, irregular rhythm, and a sprinkle note clusters.

JustABeginner wrote:

abraker wrote:

Tsunku - Shoot-'Em-Up [Invasion]
A fun and creative little circle-only reading map. It is set up such that you have to listen to the rhythm and then tap the circles. The catch? Low AR, irregular rhythm, and a sprinkle note clusters.

YOO!! SHOOT 'EM UP!
Just watched people play Rhythm Heaven.

JustABeginner wrote:

Making maps that can't be exceed 5 stars is challenging. Especially when it comes to streaming.

YyottaCat wrote:

OK Day 3 and I've found a song to map.

Scyla wrote:

the only mapping that I know is..

MAPPINGERS IN YOUR ASS

dPeace wrote:

so this is m2p but all of the judge's preference contradict each other's

dPeace wrote:

so this is m2p but all of the judge's preference contradict each other's

dPeace wrote:

so this is m2p but all of the judge's preference contradict each other's

z0z wrote:

dPeace wrote:

so this is m2p but all of the judge's preference contradict each other's

i have no idea what reviews my map will get

Corne2Plum3 wrote:

You map so fast I mapped only 10%

HoosierTransfer wrote:

Corne2Plum3 wrote:

You map so fast I mapped only 10%

i got 20%

levesterz wrote:

I did not even started yet

NeonMarijuana wrote:

/leave
nvm I gave up, the rules are just too bullshit for me and like how tf can I map a stream, or tech map but can't go more than 5 stars. These judge preferences are makes 0 fuking sense. To make a good mapping contest, it must aim at the map quality, not these bullshit rules that give you 0 for a stupid reason and the judge also seems to have no experience with mapping.
I think the winner of this contest probably be someone who just can do all these unreasonable judge preferences than someone who actually good at mapping.
I actually agree with aiq and Dank_Memez_101 that this mapping contest is shit.

JustABeginner wrote:

Would like to let you know that there's a monthly osu! beatmap contest whereby the map can't exceed 4* map.

NeonMarijuana wrote:

/leave
nvm I gave up, the rules are just too bullshit for me and like how tf can I map a stream, or tech map but can't go more than 5 stars. These judge preferences are makes 0 fuking sense. To make a good mapping contest, it must aim at the map quality, not these bullshit rules that give you 0 for a stupid reason and the judge also seems to have no experience with mapping.
I think the winner of this contest probably be someone who just can do all these unreasonable judge preferences than someone who actually good at mapping.
I actually agree with aiq and Dank_Memez_101 that this mapping contest is shit.

WitherMite wrote:

Ngl though kinda scared my map will end up being above 5* in online sr and ill have to nerf a ton of stuff, since theres no way to see that without uploading the map. Not used to mapping for a target SR.

aiq wrote:

WitherMite wrote:

Ngl though kinda scared my map will end up being above 5* in online sr and ill have to nerf a ton of stuff, since theres no way to see that without uploading the map. Not used to mapping for a target SR.

use streamcompanion, it displays actual sr

Corne2Plum3 wrote:

aiq wrote:

WitherMite wrote:

Ngl though kinda scared my map will end up being above 5* in online sr and ill have to nerf a ton of stuff, since theres no way to see that without uploading the map. Not used to mapping for a target SR.

use streamcompanion, it displays actual sr

^ This is so good when you want to have a precise SR

WitherMite wrote:

@A_childIGuess just map on 1/4 beatsnap divisor instead of 1/9 and it should be better.

actually you do have stuff snapped to 1/4 but on the wrong ticks, play the song at 50% speed and listen for when the sounds happen. unsure why you uploaded with the editor in 1/9 though. Timing point itself seems good.

A_childIGuess wrote:

anyone have the lyrics to Wa~tobi~to o~ba~hi~~~~to!!!! (は～とび～と♥お～ば～ひ～～～～と！！！！) (want to add it to sb)

ghoulybits wrote:

A_childIGuess wrote:

anyone have the lyrics to Wa~tobi~to o~ba~hi~~~~to!!!! (は～とび～と♥お～ば～ひ～～～～と！！！！) (want to add it to sb)

I feel like googling it would have been faster than making this post, but sure.

WitherMite wrote:

Ngl though kinda scared my map will end up being above 5* in online sr and ill have to nerf a ton of stuff, since theres no way to see that without uploading the map. Not used to mapping for a target SR.

NeonMarijuana wrote:

/leave
nvm I gave up, the rules are just too bullshit for me and like how tf can I map a stream, or tech map but can't go more than 5 stars. These judge preferences are makes 0 fuking sense. To make a good mapping contest, it must aim at the map quality, not these bullshit rules that give you 0 for a stupid reason and the judge also seems to have no experience with mapping.
I think the winner of this contest probably be someone who just can do all these unreasonable judge preferences than someone who actually good at mapping.
I actually agree with aiq and Dank_Memez_101 that this mapping contest is shit.

YyottaCat wrote:

WitherMite wrote:

Ngl though kinda scared my map will end up being above 5* in online sr and ill have to nerf a ton of stuff, since theres no way to see that without uploading the map. Not used to mapping for a target SR.

Yes my map is 4.98* in-game but 5.17* online. I have to nerf it now.

Polyspora wrote:

YyottaCat wrote:

WitherMite wrote:

Ngl though kinda scared my map will end up being above 5* in online sr and ill have to nerf a ton of stuff, since theres no way to see that without uploading the map. Not used to mapping for a target SR.

Yes my map is 4.98* in-game but 5.17* online. I have to nerf it now.

your map can be 5*-6*, but abraker will give you 0 if its more than 4,99*

(you can go for the 2k points tho)

Manishh wrote:

Polyspora wrote:

YyottaCat wrote:

WitherMite wrote:

Ngl though kinda scared my map will end up being above 5* in online sr and ill have to nerf a ton of stuff, since theres no way to see that without uploading the map. Not used to mapping for a target SR.

Yes my map is 4.98* in-game but 5.17* online. I have to nerf it now.

your map can be 5*-6*, but abraker will give you 0 if its more than 4,99*

(you can go for the 2k points tho)

can I be a judge but my point will not count, I am pretty experienced with a lot of different type of maps

z0z wrote:

Manishh wrote:

Polyspora wrote:

YyottaCat wrote:

WitherMite wrote:

Ngl though kinda scared my map will end up being above 5* in online sr and ill have to nerf a ton of stuff, since theres no way to see that without uploading the map. Not used to mapping for a target SR.

Yes my map is 4.98* in-game but 5.17* online. I have to nerf it now.

your map can be 5*-6*, but abraker will give you 0 if its more than 4,99*

(you can go for the 2k points tho)

can I be a judge but my point will not count, I am pretty experienced with a lot of different type of maps

what's stopping you lol

A_childIGuess

Lean Laugh Love:

Zoz

Manishh wrote:

My review:

A_childIGuess

I think the map type you are going with is "techy". Though the CS and AR is not good for the star rating of this map
Patterns don't represent the beat
No pattern recognition (patterns are completely different even if the beat is repeating)
bad timing
No rhythm
super Low bpm. Not possible for even alt players because the rhythm is not consistent
The AR is too high for the map
CS is preference but with such a high AR and low bpm patterns, it become very annoying to play.
2/10

Lean Laugh Love:

Solid map, everything is good, easy to understand rhythm, good timing. There is no way you made it in such a short period of time.
8/10

Zoz

The map is solid. Though I think AR8 will be best since using AR9 will make the map fast and the patterns you used are much more enjoyable with low AR.
Some patterns are really-really hard to read for ex- 00:05:742 (7,8,9,10,11,12,13) -
02:06:154 (1,2,1,2,3,4,5,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,5,1,2,3,4,5,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - The difficulty spike is too insane for the level of difficulty which the map maintain.

Other than that the map is damn solid. Not for ranking of course thought when It comes to enjoyment its very good, Love it
6.5/10

01:49:197 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,1,1,2,3,4,5,6,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,1,2,3,4,5,6,1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2,3,1,1,2,1,1,2,1,2,3,4,1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2,3,4,5,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,5,1,2,3,4,5,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1) -
This is such a gold man, for that I will give you 1 more point

abraker wrote:

Judge's special: WTF is wrong with your map

So a lot of you posted your maps lightning fast. Like I didn't expect you guys to be this fast. Unfortunately some your maps have issues that are bugging me too much to keep quiet on. So here are my blessings on your cursed creations

@A_childIGuess I think it's best to make it AR8. Also your map feels so mistimed it inspired me to make this post

@z0z Your map is too low AR. I recommend AR9.

That'd be all. Peace, abraker out

A_childIGuess wrote:

its a frigging featured tempplate that the bpm when I try to time it turns out bad

ClevelandsMyBro wrote:

A_childIGuess wrote:

its a frigging featured tempplate that the bpm when I try to time it turns out bad

no need to. its a perfect 280 from start to finish.

A_childIGuess wrote:

ClevelandsMyBro wrote:

A_childIGuess wrote:

its a frigging featured tempplate that the bpm when I try to time it turns out bad

no need to. its a perfect 280 from start to finish.

oh- but can I still do accelerating sliders? (also in case one plays mainia)

WitherMite wrote:

A_childIGuess wrote:

ClevelandsMyBro wrote:

A_childIGuess wrote:

its a frigging featured tempplate that the bpm when I try to time it turns out bad

no need to. its a perfect 280 from start to finish.

oh- but can I still do accelerating sliders? (also in case one plays mainia)

No, in std sliders stay at one SV, even if you change it in the middle of the slider. You have to do do some magic with red anchors to make accel sliders. But yea, your map just feels mistimed because you are mishearing rhythms and placing circles on the wrong ticks.

Manishh wrote:

My review:

A_childIGuess

I think the map type you are going with is "techy". Though the CS and AR is not good for the star rating of this map
Patterns don't represent the beat
No pattern recognition (patterns are completely different even if the beat is repeating)
bad timing
No rhythm
super Low bpm. Not possible for even alt players because the rhythm is not consistent
The AR is too high for the map
CS is preference but with such a high AR and low bpm patterns, it become very annoying to play.
2/10

Lean Laugh Love:

Solid map, everything is good, easy to understand rhythm, good timing. There is no way you made it in such a short period of time.
8/10

Zoz

The map is solid. Though I think AR8 will be best since using AR9 will make the map fast and the patterns you used are much more enjoyable with low AR.
Some patterns are really-really hard to read for ex- 00:05:742 (7,8,9,10,11,12,13) -
02:06:154 (1,2,1,2,3,4,5,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,5,1,2,3,4,5,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - The difficulty spike is too insane for the level of difficulty which the map maintain.

Other than that the map is damn solid. Not for ranking of course thought when It comes to enjoyment its very good, Love it
6.5/10

01:49:197 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,1,1,2,3,4,5,6,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,1,2,3,4,5,6,1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2,3,1,1,2,1,1,2,1,2,3,4,1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2,3,4,5,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,5,1,2,3,4,5,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1) -
This is such a gold man, for that I will give you 1 more point

HoosierTransfer wrote:

? closed

z0z wrote:

why is it closed

Polyspora wrote:

HoosierTransfer wrote:

? closed

z0z wrote:

why is it closed

too many people already, more than I thought would be, I dont know if I'll be able to rate more than 20 maps in the next days being honest

Zelzatter Zero: