Hi, M4M from your queue!
Here's a link to my map for your convenience: https://osu.ppy.sh/s/527546
[Love]
00:05:355 (5) - Just a thought, but making this a slider rather than, say, two circles makes it more challenging to place emphasis on the strong beat that follows it. If you don't have any pressing reasons to keep it a 1/2 slider, it may be better to use circles instead as a means of emphasizing the strong beat more.
00:07:468 - I would put a green line here to decrease the hitsound volume. The music's relatively quieter here. Naturally, this extrapolates to other difficulties.
00:15:919 (1,2,3,4) - Emphasis. These aren't much stronger sounds than what 00:15:708 (7,1) is mapped to, or what 00:14:229 (1,2,3) is mapped to, so I don't see the reason for making these jumps so much larger. I have a similar comment for 00:29:440 (1,2,3,4).
00:20:989 - This is an extension to my second comment. If you decrease the hitsound volume where I indicated, then it would be appropriate to bring it back up here because a new instrument is introduced.
00:46:341 (1,2,3,4) - Another hitsounding comment: these notes are pretty close to those in 00:05:778 (1,2,3,4) and yet the former has a lower hitsound volume. If anything, I'd think a higher volume would be more appropriate because it's later in the song where things are a bit more intense. The notes also aren't spaced apart as much as the ones before, but that's just aesthetics: it's hard to emphasize with that distance.
01:02:398 (3,4) - This prematurely disrupts circular flow, if only barely. I would prefer a construction like this:
01:15:074 (1,2,3) - I did a quick check, and found that these are not exactly 120 degree copies of one another. They're also not perfectly equilateral in their placement.
[Hard]
(Reminder that some comments from Love extrapolate here as well.)
00:40:426 (5,1) - This overlap triggers me. I would add a curve to (1) (maybe a blanket) to remove it.
01:08:736 (3,4) - Blanket is ever so slightly off.
[Normal]
00:01:553 (3,4) - The stacking makes these two objects too close. I would override distance snap to fix this.
00:34:510 (1,2) - Not that big a deal, but these two guys aren't quite mirror images of one another. The others were, so I thought it may have been a mistake.
[Easy]
01:04:088 (4,1) - Just a suggestion to think about, but the chorus feels a bit repetitive because of the simplified rhythm. A way to shake up the monotony would be to change this rhythm here to the following: This follows the vocals more, and it isn't very tricky to follow. Up to you, though.
Good map over-all! Thanks for having me look at it.
Here's a link to my map for your convenience: https://osu.ppy.sh/s/527546
[Love]
00:05:355 (5) - Just a thought, but making this a slider rather than, say, two circles makes it more challenging to place emphasis on the strong beat that follows it. If you don't have any pressing reasons to keep it a 1/2 slider, it may be better to use circles instead as a means of emphasizing the strong beat more.
00:07:468 - I would put a green line here to decrease the hitsound volume. The music's relatively quieter here. Naturally, this extrapolates to other difficulties.
00:15:919 (1,2,3,4) - Emphasis. These aren't much stronger sounds than what 00:15:708 (7,1) is mapped to, or what 00:14:229 (1,2,3) is mapped to, so I don't see the reason for making these jumps so much larger. I have a similar comment for 00:29:440 (1,2,3,4).
00:20:989 - This is an extension to my second comment. If you decrease the hitsound volume where I indicated, then it would be appropriate to bring it back up here because a new instrument is introduced.
00:46:341 (1,2,3,4) - Another hitsounding comment: these notes are pretty close to those in 00:05:778 (1,2,3,4) and yet the former has a lower hitsound volume. If anything, I'd think a higher volume would be more appropriate because it's later in the song where things are a bit more intense. The notes also aren't spaced apart as much as the ones before, but that's just aesthetics: it's hard to emphasize with that distance.
01:02:398 (3,4) - This prematurely disrupts circular flow, if only barely. I would prefer a construction like this:
01:15:074 (1,2,3) - I did a quick check, and found that these are not exactly 120 degree copies of one another. They're also not perfectly equilateral in their placement.
[Hard]
(Reminder that some comments from Love extrapolate here as well.)
00:40:426 (5,1) - This overlap triggers me. I would add a curve to (1) (maybe a blanket) to remove it.
01:08:736 (3,4) - Blanket is ever so slightly off.
[Normal]
00:01:553 (3,4) - The stacking makes these two objects too close. I would override distance snap to fix this.
00:34:510 (1,2) - Not that big a deal, but these two guys aren't quite mirror images of one another. The others were, so I thought it may have been a mistake.
[Easy]
01:04:088 (4,1) - Just a suggestion to think about, but the chorus feels a bit repetitive because of the simplified rhythm. A way to shake up the monotony would be to change this rhythm here to the following: This follows the vocals more, and it isn't very tricky to follow. Up to you, though.
Good map over-all! Thanks for having me look at it.