what? i think this map is way far from being bubbled. sorry. (no offence bakari)
[kris-kris-kreme]
00:19:350 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - this buildup is bad, sorry. well, maybe I shouldn't say it like that. mostly concerned about 00:20:950 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - these notes right here, they don't look nice and they flow horribly. first of all 00:21:950 (2,3,4) - this is really linear, breaking your circular flow immediately, i mean, 00:21:150 (2,3,4) - triangle/circular flow, 00:21:950 (2,3,4) - linear flow?
00:23:750 (1,2,3,4,1) - these kickslider's don't work with the SV you have, they are really awkward to play. I would raise SV
00:25:750 (1,2,3,4,5) - here you have perfect circular flow, but 00:26:950 (1,2,3,1) - right here the circular flow you have turns into vertical flow, which feels really off and awkward.
00:29:750 (4,5,1) - here again, flow drastically changes to that weird diagonal straight flow, also 00:29:950 (5,1) - space these further apart, there's no emphasis at all
00:30:150 (1,2,3,1,2) - these are two completely different flow and patterns, even though it's literally the same exact thing over again
00:30:950 (1,4) - why aren't these stacked? This just looks really weird and you don't use it anytime before or after
00:31:750 (4,1,2) - honestly again, the weird flow. If it helps let me draw it out for you:
https://puu.sh/tRMXf/4be5b5b437.jpg00:32:950 (3,4,5) - I can circle my cursor to hit these notes, but 00:33:750 (1,2,3) - riight here I can't, because your making me go really deep when trying to hit 00:34:150 (3) - this slider from 00:33:950 (2) - this circle.
00:38:150 (1) - no, this shape doesn't work with your current SV.
00:42:150 (2,4) - wow, why do you suddenly stack a sliderend?
okay, thats just the flow issues and aesthetical issues pushed out of the way. I wanna adress the spacing and emphasis issues also
00:30:550 (2,3) - 2.3x / 2.4x apart, but 00:31:350 (2,3) - these are 3.2x apart? There's no emphasis at all...
00:31:750 (4) - ctrl + g this for better emphasis on 00:32:150 (1) - this note, it will also make flow better
00:33:950 (2,3) - 2.9x apart, 00:34:750 (5,6) - 1.8x apart? They are the exact same so they should have the exact same spacing...
00:35:550 (2,3) - 2.3x spacing 00:41:550 (2,1) - 1/6x spacing? also, no emphasis 00:41:750 (1) - on this? you should space it more
00:43:350 (1,2) - now for some reason it's almost spread 3x apart
00:46:350 (6,1) - 1.8x apart?
ok, there's a bunch of random spacing, the aesthetetics are really bad (mainly talking about all of the unnecesarry overlaps) and the flow is pour. There's
a lot of room for improvement in it
I like LGV's hyper, really nice diff
[Hard]
very simmilar problems to the diff above ^^
00:14:150 (4,5) - why is there no spacing emphasis?
00:16:150 (1) - again, this should have a slight spacing emphasis (yes, you have to have proper spacing in hards also regardless if it might make the sr jump slightly)
00:17:750 (1) - same idea as above, this should have emphasis
00:21:950 (5,6) - no need to emphasize this one, it's a very noticeable inconsistency.
00:26:950 (5,1) - why seperated by 1.9x?
00:28:150 (4) - same here, there's no music behind it allowing you to increase the spacing
00:28:950 (1,2,3) - why such a weird overlap? I'd also like to say 00:26:950 (5,1,3,4,2,3) - these should all have the same amount of spacing
00:30:550 (1,2,3,4) - why really noticeable and big increase in spacing?
00:31:950 (6,1) - the aesthetic for this isn't very nice
00:35:350 (1,2,3,4) - this isn't really a pattern... it goes from up down up.... sideways? 00:35:950 (4) - this note should point up. But it would make an overlap, so you should fix that. I knew exactly what you were thinking, you wanted it to look nicer so you didn't make it go fully up, but that tells me your too lazy to move some notes around to make the overlap look nicer.
00:38:950 (3,4) - this looks like a 1/2 stack with your ar
00:39:350 (4) - nc
00:42:150 (3,4) - again, no need for emphasis here, also 00:42:150 (3,4,1,2,4) - inconsistent spacing between these two
00:46:750 (2,3) - what exactly is this? you can obviously see it doesn't resemble 00:42:950 (1,2) - this
again, the spacing, flow, and aesthetics are really poorly made in this diff and can improve a lot!
the advanced diff looks OK but there's still a lot of room for improvement aesthetic wise
ok, don't take this as a vendetta, i'm not out to get you, but i'm quite honestly surprised as to why this was bubbled (no offence bakari)