updated from Pk, since we were talking on Discord it was easy to discuss things
removed soft-sliderslide10Rizia wrote:
maybe soft-sliderslide10.wav unused
nothing else to say
applied all suggestions with the exception of sliderslide 2 being silent, I think its fine as is..Minakami Yuki wrote:
hitnormal20 has a 3ms delay which cant be passed, hitnormal2,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,16 have some kinds of delay from 1ms~3ms, i fixed all of them here, use this instead: http://puu.sh/mteW8/501854ae9c.rar
useless timing sections:
02:08:088 -
04:31:146 -
04:48:546 -
solid mapping, just some hitsound suggestions:
00:54:031 (1,2,3) - add some whistles with soft additions, quite fits
01:46:831 (3) - 01:48:203 (3) - ^
01:59:860 (1) - soft whistle?
02:08:431 (2,3,5) - ^
02:23:174 (1,2,3) - same part
03:15:631 (2,3,6,1,3,2) - also some white ticks
04:00:888 (2,3,5,2,3,5) - ^
and why not silenced sliderslide2? well, although it works fine without silenced sliderslide.
it's too late ahhh i have to go to bed now >.<
send me a pm so i can recheck it after getting up yeee
thank you, Yuki <3Minakami Yuki wrote:
Happy birthday~
and is my
hb!Minakami Yuki wrote:
Happy birthday~
but the guest mapper is banned, so she cant upload by herself.KittyAdventure wrote:
Happy Birthday and Gratzz!
but...
This map is unrankable because guest mapper made longer part than uploader.
t/358506/start=30
captin1 wrote:
would really be a shame if parts need to be deleted and redone just to satisfy a fairly ambiguous rule
Seems like a stupid solution for a stupid rule, guess that works.Kocari wrote:
Or we can pull off the yolo strats and delete the parts that Moecho did, remap them yourself the same way and say you did the work. I'm a genius, can't believe my brain works 2:30 in the morning
Normaly they should never be judged on case by case basis. Once the guest differ maps over 50%, it is "their set". And here it becomes even more obvious since it is a difference of about 35 sec, which makes one wonder why BNs skipped that even though it's one of the elementary rules in osu for good. Banned users are no exception either. What if it happens they get unbanned? Could have been prevented with owner mapping those 35 sec which has been given a solution for this case. Good luck guys!Okoratu wrote:
Since collabs are explicitly judged on a case by case basis i guess this should work then but it's already in wip / help o.o
yea I will, we talked and I have something to do, so I'll call you tomorrow to check same for Rizia and IkeMinakami Yuki wrote:
what a pity but ...ah
let us know when the collab problem is solved
thanks babe, will doHoro wrote:
RIP the dream but happy birthday and hope this gets ranked again soon!
Also add "kanojo" to tags while you're at it
Hi ono:OnosakiHito wrote:
Normaly they should never be judged on case by case basis. Once the guest differ maps over 50%, it is "their set". And here it becomes even more obvious since it is a difference of about 35 sec, which makes one wonder why BNs skipped that even though it's one of the elementary rules in osu for good. Banned users are no exception either. What if it happens they get unbanned? Could have been prevented with owner mapping those 35 sec which has been given a solution for this case. Good luck guys!Okoratu wrote:
Since collabs are explicitly judged on a case by case basis i guess this should work then but it's already in wip / help o.o