yeh why not
I can mod this
from your m4m q tho
[general]
good luck , have fun mapping
I can mod this
from your m4m q tho
[general]
- 2 osb files in song folder and widescreen checked tho
- 00:40:330 (4,5,6,7,8,9,10,1) - the stream thing here is pretty a bit awkward to play because stacked stream when you play that you might not pay attention to the amount of circles you need to click like the standard stream so that make the transition feel a bit awkward here, using a slider for better transition like what you did here 00:38:945 (4,5,6,1) - would be nice imo
- 00:50:137 (4,1) - spacing here should be a bit higher than 00:50:021 (3,4) - so it would make sense with music more imo since I think this one 00:50:252 - sound a bit more emphasized than 00:50:137 - , you actually did it nice here 00:46:329 (3,4,1) - ,00:48:175 (3,1) - ,00:49:098 (3,4,1) -
- 01:06:406 (1,2,3,4) - the current flow feel a bit weird compare with 01:05:944 (1,2,3,4) -
- 01:07:560 (4,5,1) - spacing change is not really that necessary here imo , better make spacing consistent , that would make flow here a bit better
- 01:20:252 (2,3,4) - ^ same
- 01:24:752 (3,1) - a quick turn in angle of flow here seems a bit sound sudden or something , I think it would be better to keep angle simple here 01:24:752 (3,1) - then you can do quick sharp turn here 01:24:983 (2,3,4,1) - , basically this is what in my head
- 01:51:637 (3,4) - I think flow here 01:51:175 (1,2,3,4) - would be a bit nice if you ctrl g both these 01:51:637 (3,4) - so they look like this
- 01:56:137 (2,3) - can we make the flow here a bit circular like 01:55:790 (1,2) - , that would make the flow here nice imo *insertIcan'tpassthismapmeme*
- 02:05:252 (2,3,4,5) - try this rhythm ? sound better imo
- 02:07:560 (4) - ctrl+g this would make the flow here 02:07:329 (3,4,1,2) - better imo
- 02:17:829 (4,1) - spacing here should be a bit bigger than 02:17:598 (3,4) - so it make sense with the music more , you can try move 02:17:829 (4) - to around x72 y208
- 02:22:098 (1,2,3,4) - I feel like the flow and spacing are a bit too much for some reason , and I also comparing this with the other part that sound similiar here 04:40:558 (1,2,3,4) - , 05:11:942 (1,2,3,4) - and I see that flow and spacing aren't that much like 02:22:098 (1,2,3,4) - so yea you can nerf this part a bit for consistency or something
- 02:50:021 (4,5,1) - I believe this might fit the song more here if it is a stacked 1/4 notes , spaced 1/4 here feel a bit not that natural or something with the song here imo
- 03:04:905 (6,1) - give this less angle (I guess) would somehow make the flow here 03:04:789 (5,6,1) - better imo , you can try move 03:04:905 (6) - to around x224 y252
- 03:11:712 (2) - ctrl+g this would make flow here 03:11:482 (1,2,1,2,3,4) - nice imo
- 03:19:789 - why ignore this beat ? I think if you map this beat , it would make rhythm here sound better
- 03:50:827 (3) - ctrl+g this would make flow here 03:50:712 (2,3,4,1) - nice imo
- 03:57:173 (2,3) - ctrl+g rhythm here maybe would make the spacing and flow here 03:57:173 (2,3,4,5,1) - a bit better , personally I find that it no need to use high spacing here 03:57:289 (3,4) - , (4) is fit for something like uhhh hard to explain , flow break , angle flow or something idk
- 03:57:635 (1,2,3) - consistent spacing would make flow here a bit better imo
- 04:02:135 (5,1) - low spacing here really make the flow here play weird imo , would be nice if you move 04:02:135 (5) - to around x160 y56 so it would make flow here 04:01:789 (2,3,4,5,1) - better
- 04:07:789 (1,2) - this spcing looks a bit large when compare with others 1/1 spacing that you did previously , spacing would be consistent more if you ctrl+g rhythm here 04:08:250 (2,3) -
- 04:19:904 (2,3) - angle tho , try move 04:20:019 (3) - to around x384 y132 so it would make the angle here a bit better
- 04:26:942 (6) - ctrl+g this would make the flow here 04:26:712 (5,6,1) - nice imo
- 04:51:635 (1) - why nc here I don't see anything worth nc here , the flow and spacing are somehow easy to read here so nc is not really that necessary imo
- 04:52:904 (5,1) - spacing here should be a bit bigger than 04:52:789 (4,5) - so it would make sense with music more imo since 04:53:019 - sound a bit more emphasized than 04:52:904 -
- 05:43:558 (3,4) - ctrl+g rhythm here would make flow here 05:43:327 (1,2,3,4,1) - a bit better imo
good luck , have fun mapping