pretty sure C 1x missed that with relaxTess wrote:
I was so expecting another youtube video after this postKheldragar wrote:
My god
Okay, I change it to passing DT FD4D
Just stick to DT Rainbow Dash Likes Girls
pretty sure C 1x missed that with relaxTess wrote:
I was so expecting another youtube video after this postKheldragar wrote:
My god
Okay, I change it to passing DT FD4D
Just stick to DT Rainbow Dash Likes Girls
was that before or after he 4mod fc'd that tag4 map?Riince wrote:
pretty sure C 1x missed that with relaxTess wrote:
I was so expecting another youtube video after this post
Just stick to DT Rainbow Dash Likes Girls
different reasons? first DQ was for too drain being too high on HR (fixed by adjusting HP), second was due to 'abruptness'. the slider being the same has no connection to both DQs.joolomasta wrote:
The map was already DQ'd one time because of that slider. How is it possible that it took the QAT team 6 days to notice that the slider was still the same?
joolomasta wrote:
Also, it doesn't really make sense that the reason for DQ is partly based on an untrue statement (there is a slowdown that uses 0.75x contrary to what the post says). The stack leniency setting has no effect on the map itself so it cannot be a reason for disqualification, neither the white flashes in the storyboard. I haven't heard players complaining about that slider, either. This leaves us with nothing warranting a DQ.
fuel your QAT hate somewhere else.Garven wrote:
Some additional notes:.
handsome wrote:
different reasons? first DQ was for too drain being too high on HR (fixed by adjusting HP), second was due to 'abruptness'. the slider being the same has no connection to both DQs.joolomasta wrote:
The map was already DQ'd one time because of that slider. How is it possible that it took the QAT team 6 days to notice that the slider was still the same?
I had an argument to back my opinion. How you simply dismiss it as "QAT hate" and ignore the argument itself is not how civilised people discuss. You may disagree with me and that's fine but please at least provide a reason you do so instead of trying to play me down. If those points were just additional notes, they should not cause a DQ.handsome wrote:
fuel your QAT hate somewhere else.(quite sure garven meant using more of the playfield for the slider, not SV)
What do you suggest then? Criticizing and not giving any suggestion that would work better considering the comment from the mapper won't help much.Ash Marley wrote:
That slider was ridiculous anyway. You shouldn't need to slider break on a sightread because the mapper made an out of place sudden super slowed down slider after a 2000+ combo. WWW minus 1 because of that unnecessary change in velocity. I'm sure many more messed up by that out of the blue slider.
Hmmmm? Jenny explained her reasoning behind that slider and it makes perfect sense to me.Ash Marley wrote:
That slider was ridiculous anyway. You shouldn't need to slider break on a sightread because the mapper made an out of place sudden super slowed down slider after a 2000+ combo. WWW minus 1 because of that unnecessary change in velocity. I'm sure many more messed up by that out of the blue slider.
It doesn't change that it's too unexpected and inconsistent. The "rhythm" is killed at that point.Lax wrote:
Hmmmm? Jenny explained her reasoning behind that slider and it makes perfect sense to me.Ash Marley wrote:
That slider was ridiculous anyway. You shouldn't need to slider break on a sightread because the mapper made an out of place sudden super slowed down slider after a 2000+ combo. WWW minus 1 because of that unnecessary change in velocity. I'm sure many more messed up by that out of the blue slider.
Go read up on the discussion first dude.
i'm not really on anyone's side but this isn't a very good way to determine SV at all. if you checked ingame the ticks appear slowly after the slider appears, it isn't too reliable as a reading tool. plus the first few points are on the sliderhead itself, not much you can see about that.[ Manoa ] wrote:
There's a skinnable thing called "sliderscorepoint" if you can see a slow slider coming with many of these points, you should change it and learn not only to read circles and sliders but also those tiny circles inside
Jenny wrote:
@Lanturn: 06:42:555 (5) - if this is the slider you mean, sure I can fix that. won't upload for now though, no changes until this entire thing is cleared up.
And good doesn't always mean fun. Would you rather have a map that good well but plays shit, or a map that doesn't look good but plays awesomely?[ S a k u r a ] wrote:
Fun doesn't always means good, please stay on topic and provide map related suggestions that will be helpful for mapper to improve his/her map
Jenny wrote:
Also, #modhelp pointed something out:...
can you please elaborate on this[ S a k u r a ] wrote:
Fun doesn't always means good
and good is subjetive, anyways I really don't see any problem with that slider it fit really well what jenny is trying to do, maybe change the slider shape to a one that let the player know about it (just as suggestion).[ S a k u r a ] wrote:
Fun doesn't always means good, please stay on topic and provide map related suggestions that will be helpful for mapper to improve his/her map
Exactly this.deathmarc4 wrote:
Have people forgotten how to read sv? I've gotten jipped by other maps with "random" slow sliders (cough wahrheit cough) enough times to learn when to expect them and how to deal with them. It's just another aspect of reading the map.
How about 95% of the testplays I requested and watched, then? :pAsh Marley wrote:
Neither is your 1 example of your personal experience then.
Sounds like you don't know who I am - just about everything I touch is "too far for it's times"/"out of the box"/"awkward" and it generally results in a shitstorm or DQ, or at least when I don't pick a very plain song to map :pLitharrale wrote:
With a DQ like this, I'm sure that Jenny won't try anything similar to this in the future which is sad.
She, name and profile should clarify that :VLitharrale wrote:
I dream of a day when I don't open up /r/osugame to "X has been disqualified!". With 11 ranked beatmaps, I'm sure Jenny knows what he/she is doing.