DakeDekaane wrote:

Hi.

I apologize for being a bit late. pls

[ Kantan]
01:10:937 (90) - Remove to follow cleaner this sound-that-I-don't-know-it's-called-but-I-think-you-know-what-I-am-talking-about. 01:10:502 (89) - Deleted this instead to follow 00:39:198 - . I do not want to remove 90 since there kinda is a note too

[ Futsuu]
00:06:445 (7) - Move it to 00:06:589 - so it follows the chime bell along with the next note, it'd be easier to catch the rhythm as they're more noticeable. deleted instead so it doesn't disturb 00:07:024 (7) -
00:25:285 (40) - Maybe remove this note? I think it'd be nice to focus on a single instrument here, up to you. Also sounds a bit incomplete as you didn't map 00:25:720 - gon
00:31:807 (52) - don to have consistency with 00:28:329 (46) - 00:30:068 (49) - following pitch and it goes down here (that's why k d instead of d k
00:39:633 (65) - Remove to follow cleaner this sound-that-I-don't-know-it's-called-but-I-think-you-know-what-I-am-talking-about. As I said in Kantan, I want to follow the tone change
00:54:416 (88) - Probably remove, to let the pattern begin along with the strongest beats. gon
01:02:676 - I feel a kat is missing here, but difficulty will increase a bit, but as you have another 1/3 double later, I don't think having another will hurt. moved previous note here instead which should be okay since the same pattern 01:03:836 (106,107) - is here

[ Muzukashii]
00:26:445 (61) - This would sound better being a don, as the tone is lower than the previous and next notes.
00:27:459 (64) - ^ changed both
00:31:807 (75) - Shouldn't this should be a don to have consistency with 00:28:329 (66), and 00:30:068 (71) - and 00:33:546 (80) - ? same as Futsuu
00:39:633 (93) - Remove to follow cleaner this sound-that-I-don't-know-it's-called-but-I-think-you-know-what-I-am-talking-about. same as Footshoe
01:09:633 (164) - Move to 01:09:488 - and add a don in 01:09:923 - ? This will follow the cello nicely, as it is now feels a bit random, and considering you've been following it quite correctly, yeah, this stands out. 1/3 dK would be bad idea imo. It follows the.. thing sound a bit so I don't really think it needs to be changed

[ Oni]
00:04:271 (14) - This note would play better in 00:03:981 - . The big kat feel a bit random as it is now, but having a note in the downbeat would complete this alternating 1/3 doubles, making it more natural to play. It's supposed to serve as a kind of break. The big kat is reasonable since there is a sound in the music.
00:06:589 - There should be a big note here to have consistency with the other bell sounds like this. Wouldn't sound well

DakeDekaane wrote:

[ Salad]
01:10:502 (1) - So we have a rule saying there must be at least 1/2 beat after a spinner, and this is 1/3 so.... I'd suggest to end this in 01:11:807 - or 01:12:242 - , and put a note in 01:12:531 - Done.
Also it sounds a bit sad the end being 5% volume, with the music having nothing like fade-out there. Ok I removed two green lines to have more audio.

[ Platter]
01:10:502 (1) - Same as in Salad. Fixed.
And same comment about the volume. Fixed.

omg my first ctb mod

I'll bub after Kurokami gives the okay for the CtB diffs or he can bub as Taiko diffs have my okay to go, but cdh hasn't finished his mod so...

...poke me when something happens.

1. 00:02:966 (1) - Sounds much better in the 1/4 tick 00:03:002 - . That way, you'll have your sliders like 1/4 1/4 1/4 1/3.
2. 00:09:488 (3) - Those are 1/8s that should start at 00:09:524 - .
3. 00:12:097 (4) - 1/4 -> 00:12:133 - .
4. 00:12:568 - Add another beat to match with the accordion. Only having a beat at 00:12:676 - makes that part empty.
5. 00:12:966 - If you decide adding another beat, make it 1/3
6. 00:16:445 (3) - The question here is... There's a beat at the 1/6, but the high pitched accordion uses the beat 00:16:481 - and the repetition at the 1/8 00:16:535 - . Your decision here~
7. 00:19:054 (5) - The high pitched accordion goes at 00:19:017 - (1/12), but if you follow the background instrument the note is well placed. Strange that it's only a slider, but understandable.
8. 00:19:488 - 00:19:923 - 00:20:358 - A note here is possible to add, following the reasoning of previous examples (optional).
9. 00:22:531 (4) - 1/4 -> 00:22:568 - .
10. 00:23:474 (2) - Make it at 00:23:437 - and add a repetition at 00:23:492 - ?
11. 00:26:046 - Add note.
12. 00:26:445 (4) - 1/4 -> 00:26:481 - .
13. 00:32:242 (2) - Better leave it as a single note in the white tick?
14. 00:33:546 (1) - Remove the repetition, and add a proper beat at 00:34:271 - ? You could add an extra note at the white tick 00:34:416 - , if you want.
15. 00:39:198 (1) - Make it end at 00:41:807 - ? Sounds more clean imo. Or make something similar as in Salad: Make it end at 00:41:227 - and add notes to cover the gap.
16. 00:43:437 - Optional to add a note.
17. 00:43:872 (4) - 1/3 -> 00:43:836 - .
18. 00:46:916 - Add extra beat?
19. 00:47:314 (3) - 1/4 -> 00:47:350 - .
20. 00:49:089 (4) - Halve the slider and make a repetition?
21. 00:52:676 (4) - Similar case as 00:33:546 (1) - . If you go for that suggestion, add beats at 00:53:401 - and 00:53:546 - (and much more optional for 00:53:365 - and 00:53:437 - , which are the 1/12s).
22. 00:56:155 (4) - If you follow the accordion too, a beat at 00:56:517 - is possible.
23. 01:01:372 (1) - Similar case, with a possible beat at 01:02:097 - .
24. 01:02:894 (3) - This one is clear, it has to be moved to 01:02:966 - .
25. 01:03:111 (1) - Possible beat at 01:03:872 - .

1. 00:19:017 (5) - 1/4 -> 00:19:089 - .
2. 00:23:474 (2) - 1/4 -> 00:23:437 - .
3. 01:09:524 (2) - I bet you wanted to snap the end of the slider at the white tick, but something went wrong :p

Deif wrote:

I'm getting an offset of 507 (+4ms). The current one sounds sliiiightly early.

[Platter]

1. 00:02:966 (1) - Sounds much better in the 1/4 tick 00:03:002 - . That way, you'll have your sliders like 1/4 1/4 1/4 1/3. Yeah.
2. 00:09:488 (3) - Those are 1/8s that should start at 00:09:524 - . Done.
3. 00:12:097 (4) - 1/4 -> 00:12:133 - . ^
4. 00:12:568 - Add another beat to match with the accordion. Only having a beat at 00:12:676 - makes that part empty. ^
5. 00:12:966 - If you decide adding another beat, make it 1/3 Done.
6. 00:16:445 (3) - The question here is... There's a beat at the 1/6, but the high pitched accordion uses the beat 00:16:481 - and the repetition at the 1/8 00:16:535 - . Your decision here~ I remapped this and you might hate me for the pattern I chose here.
7. 00:19:054 (5) - The high pitched accordion goes at 00:19:017 - (1/12), but if you follow the background instrument the note is well placed. Strange that it's only a slider, but understandable. Remapped this.
8. 00:19:488 - 00:19:923 - 00:20:358 - A note here is possible to add, following the reasoning of previous examples (optional). Done, also added another HDash with that.
9. 00:22:531 (4) - 1/4 -> 00:22:568 - . Done.
10. 00:23:474 (2) - Make it at 00:23:437 - and add a repetition at 00:23:492 - ? No, the voice starts definitely at 00:23:474 - for my ear.
11. 00:26:046 - Add note. Ok.
12. 00:26:445 (4) - 1/4 -> 00:26:481 - . Yeah.
13. 00:32:242 (2) - Better leave it as a single note in the white tick? It's okay like that, the voice is lenghtened, even if you can just hear it slightly.
14. 00:33:546 (1) - Remove the repetition, and add a proper beat at 00:34:271 - ? You could add an extra note at the white tick 00:34:416 - , if you want. Done.
15. 00:39:198 (1) - Make it end at 00:41:807 - ? Sounds more clean imo. Or make something similar as in Salad: Make it end at 00:41:227 - and add notes to cover the gap. I made it end at 00:41:372 - and added some note at 00:41:698 - .
16. 00:43:437 - Optional to add a note. Done.
17. 00:43:872 (4) - 1/3 -> 00:43:836 - . No change, listen carefully, there is some sort of drum at 00:43:872 - .
18. 00:46:916 - Add extra beat? Done.
19. 00:47:314 (3) - 1/4 -> 00:47:350 - . Done.
20. 00:49:089 (4) - Halve the slider and make a repetition? Nope, don't like that, what does that repetition follow anyway?
21. 00:52:676 (4) - Similar case as 00:33:546 (1) - . If you go for that suggestion, add beats at 00:53:401 - and 00:53:546 - (and much more optional for 00:53:365 - and 00:53:437 - , which are the 1/12s). Done.
22. 00:56:155 (4) - If you follow the accordion too, a beat at 00:56:517 - is possible. I really prefer it as it is now e.e
23. 01:01:372 (1) - Similar case, with a possible beat at 01:02:097 - . Remapped this slightly.
24. 01:02:894 (3) - This one is clear, it has to be moved to 01:02:966 - . Yup.
25. 01:03:111 (1) - Possible beat at 01:03:872 - . ^Remapped that a bit.

[Salad]

1. 00:19:017 (5) - 1/4 -> 00:19:089 - . There is a voice starting at 00:19:017 - , listen carefully. No change here.
2. 00:23:474 (2) - 1/4 -> 00:23:437 - . Done.
3. 01:09:524 (2) - I bet you wanted to snap the end of the slider at the white tick, but something went wrong :p Whoops done.

[]
Only modded the timeline by now. Contact me in-game to check all the spots together (I might've missed some, but I wanna double check with you). The note additions are pure suggestions to give a bit more of diversity to the difficulty, but they aren't a must.

Call me back to review all the diffs, please /o/

03:50 Nwolf: hm I removed the non-white tick notes in Kantan
03:52 Nwolf: Do I have to get Deif if I update lol
03:53 DakeDekaane: nah
03:54 DakeDekaane: but are you sure you want to remove all those notes'
03:54 DakeDekaane: ?
03:54 Nwolf: Either remove or move
03:58 DakeDekaane: okay, just asking because there are some that are nice to play, like 00:28:333 (34,35) - and similar, could fit as 2/1, but not so nicely,  lol
03:59 Nwolf: 00:29:637 - I added a note here to compensate :3
04:00 DakeDekaane: oh, sounds nice
04:00 DakeDekaane: I'm thinking you removed the one it's only a double in 1/1 and not a triple
04:00 Nwolf: ye double
04:00 DakeDekaane: wait, that sentence didn't make sense
04:01 DakeDekaane: but I see you got my point
04:01 Nwolf: updated
04:07 DakeDekaane: 00:34:420 (41) - this sounds a bit weird as you've been doing doubles, and the music is very similar
04:07 DakeDekaane: 00:58:767 (70) - ^
04:08 DakeDekaane: 01:04:854 (78) - and this could be removed so you follow cleaner the accordion thing
04:09 Nwolf: yeah removed all
04:09 DakeDekaane: did you change something in Futsuu?
04:09 Nwolf: yeahhhh
04:10 Nwolf: 00:37:753 - removed the note here
04:12 DakeDekaane: 00:41:231 (64) - shouldn't this be removed too then? though it has a higher tone so I'd understand if you refuse to this
04:12 DakeDekaane: 01:09:057 (115) - but this could be gone for consistency
04:12 Nwolf: lol I thought I removed that one
04:13 Nwolf: Muzu and Oni are harder in that last part
04:13 Nwolf: so ye it would be like repitition but slightly harder
04:13 DakeDekaane: kk
04:13 DakeDekaane: that'd be all
04:14 Nwolf: hm I'm thinking about
04:15 Nwolf: 00:02:137 (5,6,7) - These as 1/6???
04:15 Nwolf: (Oni)
04:16 DakeDekaane: though that'd be the correct snap, looks really bad while playing
04:16 DakeDekaane: as notes are overlapping really hard
04:17 Nwolf: huh they overlap more with 1/8
04:17 DakeDekaane: 1/6 triple you meant?
04:18 Nwolf: yes
04:18 DakeDekaane: no really, it's way off
04:18 Nwolf: k den
04:19 Nwolf: Updated Kantan and Futsuu once more with your suggestions
04:22 DakeDekaane: alright

DakeDekaane wrote:

(ノ･ω･)ノ ...
Qualifi..... ed.