lordraika
Of course you deserve a kds, since now the diff sounds much better. Thanks for your help!lordraika wrote:
01:03:359 - add note... a very strong beat like this 01:03:552 (3) - 01:03:746 (1) - (There's already a note there)
01:32:874 (11,12) - whistle? why? XD (Cos of the high notes. I thought it could fit)
btw S:C1-Clap will be cool for every strong beat like this like u usually did at the beginning...
by just changing their sampleset , ignoring the timing point's custom set... (without adding new timing point) (That's compensated with the usage of the D-Clap)
06:21:793 - full 1/2 strong beat part... (I didn't understand well what you meant there o.o)
07:23:374 -
Sey
That font was used since that's the one that Cytus put over the official BG, marking the title-artist. Very nice suggestions, thanks!Sey wrote:
- 00:05:681 (2) - I really cannot find a beat here. If you do something like this it fits the rhythm a bit better in my opinion: (I prefer to keep the consistency with similar patterns later. Also there's no beat at 00:05:294 - where your repetition is)
- 00:07:230 (3) - If you map this sound you also would need to map 00:07:423 - , 00:07:617 - , 00:07:810 - because they are the same beats. However, if you applied my first suggestion you should keep consistenty here by doing a long slider with reverse arrow again. (But there are no beats there D:)
- 01:01:810 (8,1) - Why a HDash here... I mean the beat is not even getting louder and it is coming out of nowhere. Just keep the distance as you had at 01:00:649 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - (It's mainly due to the stanza change)
- 01:03:746 (1,2,3) - I dislike this pattern. It doesn't play very smooth. An option would be to ctrl+G (2) and decrease the distance between the sliders to avoid any HDashes, still I am not 100% sure about this. (Just reduced the distance between those sliders, plays better now)
- 01:33:165 (1,2,3,4,5) - I really didn't expect to get this easier from note to note, I'd make it exactly the other way around, like: https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/1885853 (Disagreed there. There's no crescendo at all, and therefore I vowed for stability there)
- 02:27:564 (2,3) - Sounds really odd somehow, doesn't seem to fit the melody here. Suggest highly to delete (2) and (3) here and give the slider before one more reverse arrow. (Follows the violin)
- 04:37:578 (1,2,3,4) - Increasing distances from note to note with a little HDash at the end (just if you want) seems better to me. (A decrescendo sounds more fittable)
- 04:50:013 (4,1) - HDash maybe? But if you do so get rid of the spinner and map on the notes which I also prefer because there are a lot of notes that can be mapped well inside of the spinner. (The spinner stays. It gives a good intro to the break time and also fits to the long note)
- 05:54:950 (1) - x: 160 and I am happy (Oh gosh... I refused to put an HDash there, sorry)
- 06:47:057 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,5,6) - This part feels so odd... I would map on the 1/4 drums here because they are much more outstanding than the Piano voices at this part. Please think about remapping this section. (It's the introduction to the kiai time, and also those 1/3s are kinda easy compared to the ones that come. Let's consider them as an introduction to the other ones)
- Wasn't there a rule about 1/2 distances between note and spinner? ._. This rule counts also for 07:07:584 (1,1) - , 07:10:348 (1,1) - , 07:26:532 (1,1) - , 01:39:359 (1,1) - , 02:05:681 (1,1) - , 04:50:211 (1,1) - and 06:34:425 (1,1) - I know there were thousand discussions about it already, especially if that only counts before, after or before/after spinner, ranking criteria says after a spinner, but I personally also dislike this short distance before a spinner, so in the end this is probably up to you... (The rule was modified and the only restriction was 1/2 from spinner to note. Nevertheless, I gave a bit more of distance spinner-to-note to make them more visible and intuitive)