It still seems like too much of a single-dimension approach in my opinion. There's many instances of maps with insanely lower density, which won't build up the strain values, that are much harder than high density because of how awkward the correlations between the patterns are with each other. In many cases maps show to be more of a confusing layout to play rather than a physical challenge.

I actually believe the physical side to difficulty to be a little less relevant since in most cases when a player reaches the reading skill required to play high speed maps that would require good stamina, he would of also have indirectly trained the physical abilities to do so.

I don't believe it's possible to algorithmically solve for a strain or difficulty value of patterns when even pro players encounter pattern that to their disbelief is much harder than they thought it'd be. Especially when, no offense, yourself and a big chunk and or your help and feedback (including myself) are players not experienced enough to accurately depict the exact dimensions of what makes a map more difficult than others. It also doesn't help that concept itself is a mostly abstract one either.

A good example of this is how the very same map can become much harder or much easier just by switching the lanes around, aka using random. I'm not joking when I say that some instances of random can have ridiculous effects on a song's difficulty. Yet both maps will the same per-lane strains, the same density, the same length and the same speed.

Tom94 wrote:

Of course nothing stops you or anyone from providing a list of easy and hard patterns.

This is like what you said to me about opinions. For some people, they find jackhammers incredibly easy, but stairs hard, vice versa.

Tom94 wrote:

Everything is done automatically, which ensures, that every map gets the exact same treatment.

Weren't we trying to avoid something like that before? Pretty soon, some people will start saying that what you're using is broken as well.

Drace wrote:

Also a difficulty rating team won't be hard to run and manage at all. The only thing is it might be slightly challenging to get it started. It'd just be an extra step between bubble and rank, it will more accurate than any algorith, and a number of members will make it not biased. There's also no reason for this to take months haha

^ Get it started sooner and it will work easily. There should be multiple rules for applying though, like being above rank #200, skill in modding, have made a map, and/or are a BAT member. Even some low rank people could help by testing out easy maps and such. How a process could work is first, the map should be qualified. Once that happens, about 7 users should play each diff (not all having to be the same players each diff) with no mods, a vision mod, or hard rock (No key mods, random, or easy mods), and should get a C or greater. They would use a forum to fill out that would judge by a scale of 1-25 or any other number on things such as patterns, note frequency, chords, freezes, etc. They'd submit their opinion to Tom94 (Since he's running it mostly ATM) and then a simple math equation could be done to find an average of everyone's submitted fourm.

October Scream wrote:

Tom94 wrote:

Everything is done automatically, which ensures, that every map gets the exact same treatment.

Weren't we trying to avoid something like that before? Pretty soon, some people will start saying that what you're using is broken as well.

Do you think an automatic difficulty calculation algorithm is inherently broken? If that is the case, why?

October Scream wrote:

Tom94 wrote:

Of course nothing stops you or anyone from providing a list of easy and hard patterns.

This is like what you said to me about opinions. For some people, they find jackhammers incredibly easy, but stairs hard, vice versa.

October Scream wrote:

^ Get it started sooner and it will work easily. There should be multiple rules for applying though, like being above rank #200, skill in modding, have made a map, and/or are a BAT member. Even some low rank people could help by testing out easy maps and such. How a process could work is first, the map should be qualified. Once that happens, about 7 users should play each diff (not all having to be the same players each diff) with no mods, a vision mod, or hard rock (No key mods, random, or easy mods), and should get a C or greater. They would use a forum to fill out that would judge by a scale of 1-25 or any other number on things such as patterns, note frequency, chords, freezes, etc. They'd submit their opinion to Tom94 (Since he's running it mostly ATM) and then a simple math equation could be done to find an average of everyone's submitted fourm.

I don't think that solution would solve the problem about patterns being subjective, even, it would involve even more subjectivity (not all people would consider a difficulty of "21" the same), and it would add randomness (due to the judges not being always the same people; and even if they were the same people all the time, there is still an element of randomness in their own judgments).

Getting a list of maps with the difficulties determined the way you describe would be useful, though. With those values it would be possible to analyze in more detail how different elements make osu!mania maps difficult so the algorithm can be improved.

The thing about the algorithm path to determine difficulty levels is that it only needs to be done well once to make it work for all maps.

Tom94 wrote:

There won't be any rating team, due to the immense amount of time that'd be required to manage it, sorry. Give the algorithm chances, write which maps you think are rated wrong as some others already did.

I already have ideas on how to circumvent those high-density patterns from being weighted too much.

I believe other people like Drace said what I just want to said below.

I'm not saying the algorithm is "wrong". It's always "correct" and reflect one kind of difficulty - based on a certain norm.
Actually, we everyone have a norm. For example, when I say that

xxbidiao wrote:

Imperishable night 2006 is underrated. Its later half is crazy.

I implied that

xxbidiao's thought wrote:

Imperishable night 2006 is underrated. Its later half is crazy. That's why I can't get good score on this song amongst other song of same "difficulty".

You should get what I mean - It's nonsense at all to the community, because other people may find it easy or even harder - in one word, have different thoughts. And it's all about the norm we set up during our years of rhythm gaming experience.

For instance, I started rhythm gaming on Taiko no Tatsujin and DJMAX / DDR, which is all note-biased. Without good experience on slider-style song, I'm good on IIDX style songs, but poor at O2-style songs.
However, Fate_Yakumo, another player who is of O2Jam expert, find these slider songs easy - He can S a song of O2Jam style that I can't pass. When coming to IIDX songs, instead of one-side winning, we are just at the same level, something 70% vs 30%.
You guess what? I always overrate slider-biased song, and he always overrate note-biased ones.

This example reflect 2 common norm in 7/8K: IIDX norm and O2Jam norm. There are also many more, and every key amount have multiple norms. Sadly they are not enough compact with each other. And whether you admit it or not, you are setting up your own norm.

Just like what you have said,

Tom94 wrote:

I already have ideas on how to circumvent those high-density patterns from being weighted too much

You implied that "I'll degrade these players who is good at high-density pattern playing" (To some extent moving away from IIDX norm to O2Jam norm).

So this is why I keep saying that "This difficulty number does nothing with actual difficulty at all" and "We should try to admit there are weighted songs".
Considering the diversity of mania players, however you modify your algorithm, there are always some people winning, and some people losing.

My suggestion is, however hard it is, and however offence you made, a certain norm should be set up. Whether you choose BMS norm (note biased, density and jackhammers counts ) or O2Jam norm (slider biased, coordination counts) or even DDR norm (hand speed counts) or a mixture of them, Don't hesitate to say that "I mean to hurt you" because what norm you choose you hurt some people who have ability that the norm doesn't emphasize on. What's more, the process of letting players finding their weighted song is fun, isn't it?

-----------------

For the DT stuff, I actually have more to say.
Why do people come here to protest about DT score problem?
Actually it's not about scoring at all (People can play DT on the first run).
DT getting higher weight neglects the design of the osu!mania system.

You may have noticed that osu!mania has the most strict judgment with MAX even on OD0 (Actually OD0 and OD10 has no difference on timing of MAX). This is intended because most people agree that osu!mania should be different to other modes by having judgment emphasized, not combo. (o!m once calculate score just like o!standard and current scoring system is later decided.) The philosophy inside is that 1 more MAX is good.

However having DT heavier weighted, though completely reasonable, is going against this. People may achieve a just-so-so S score to win more PP then a SS with 90% MAX ratio. This put osu!mania far away from it's emphasize on judgment, to the extent that people just DTing every song regardless of judgment, and people no longer care about MAX ratio. This is surely what people don't want to see. (Feature requests on DT bonus score has been rejected multiple times both by faculty and players)

So unless ppy somewhat change the mechanism to make DT version of the beatmap a whole new one and have its separate scoreboard, I suggest no bonus for DT for now.

The algorithm is still unrefined and not final, give it some time. Being butthurt about it is not helping anyone. The guy who is doing effort trying to make your ranking system better for once is getting flamed around every corner, do you think that will be a positive influence for him? What we need is actual feedback.

I am slowly progressing on some small list of the maps I personally play of what is under/over rated myself and what patterns might be causing this, but I will need some more time before I can make conclusions. I suggest you could do this yourself with the maps you play too, because for example I can only judge intermediate maps: I have no understanding of beginner or ET maps. Even if you don't feel like you are really understanding what patterns are causing it to be harder/easier, just having a list will already be helpful. If you are considerably better at LN than chords, or vice versa, that might be worth noting aswell.

October Scream wrote:

Tom94 wrote:

Of course nothing stops you or anyone from providing a list of easy and hard patterns.

This is like what you said to me about opinions. For some people, they find jackhammers incredibly easy, but stairs hard, vice versa.

It's still possible to take the average of the opinions of multiple people.
And yeah, a ranking system is inherently based on opinions. There will always be someone who completely disagrees with it, and that's completely valid.

October Scream wrote:

Tom94 wrote:

Everything is done automatically, which ensures, that every map gets the exact same treatment.

Weren't we trying to avoid something like that before? Pretty soon, some people will start saying that what you're using is broken as well.

What exactly do you mean by that. What did you want to avoid? I've always wanted equal treatment of maps in regards to the difficulty constraints.

October Scream wrote:

Drace wrote:

Also a difficulty rating team won't be hard to run and manage at all. The only thing is it might be slightly challenging to get it started. It'd just be an extra step between bubble and rank, it will more accurate than any algorith, and a number of members will make it not biased. There's also no reason for this to take months haha

^ Get it started sooner and it will work easily. There should be multiple rules for applying though, like being above rank #200, skill in modding, have made a map, and/or are a BAT member. Even some low rank people could help by testing out easy maps and such. How a process could work is first, the map should be qualified. Once that happens, about 7 users should play each diff (not all having to be the same players each diff) with no mods, a vision mod, or hard rock (No key mods, random, or easy mods), and should get a C or greater. They would use a forum to fill out that would judge by a scale of 1-25 or any other number on things such as patterns, note frequency, chords, freezes, etc. They'd submit their opinion to Tom94 (Since he's running it mostly ATM) and then a simple math equation could be done to find an average of everyone's submitted fourm.

It'd be impossible for me to manage the team itself, due to having only limited time and lack of knowledge about the gamemode.
But it would be great, if you guys could set something like this up. As long as the difficulty lists are incomplete it can be used as reference for the algorithm and if you actually manage to provide reliable and complete (all ranked maps, including converts for the beginning; _all_ uploaded maps in the end for the star rating) difficulty values that make a great ranking system, then I'm sure you can convince us to use it. That'd be an incredible feat, though.

xxbidiao wrote:

Tom94 wrote:

There won't be any rating team, due to the immense amount of time that'd be required to manage it, sorry. Give the algorithm chances, write which maps you think are rated wrong as some others already did.

I already have ideas on how to circumvent those high-density patterns from being weighted too much.

I believe other people like Drace said what I just want to said below.

I'm not saying the algorithm is "wrong". It's always "correct" and reflect one kind of difficulty - based on a certain norm.
Actually, we everyone have a norm. For example, when I say that

xxbidiao wrote:

Imperishable night 2006 is underrated. Its later half is crazy.

I implied that

xxbidiao's thought wrote:

Imperishable night 2006 is underrated. Its later half is crazy. That's why I can't get good score on this song amongst other song of same "difficulty".

You should get what I mean - It's nonsense at all to the community, because other people may find it easy or even harder - in one word, have different thoughts. And it's all about the norm we set up during our years of rhythm gaming experience.

For instance, I started rhythm gaming on Taiko no Tatsujin and DJMAX / DDR, which is all note-biased. Without good experience on slider-style song, I'm good on IIDX style songs, but poor at O2-style songs.
However, Fate_Yakumo, another player who is of O2Jam expert, find these slider songs easy - He can S a song of O2Jam style that I can't pass. When coming to IIDX songs, instead of one-side winning, we are just at the same level, something 70% vs 30%.
You guess what? I always overrate slider-biased song, and he always overrate note-biased ones.

This example reflect 2 common norm in 7/8K: IIDX norm and O2Jam norm. There are also many more, and every key amount have multiple norms. Sadly they are not enough compact with each other. And whether you admit it or not, you are setting up your own norm.

Just like what you have said,

Tom94 wrote:

I already have ideas on how to circumvent those high-density patterns from being weighted too much

You implied that "I'll degrade these players who is good at high-density pattern playing" (To some extent moving away from IIDX norm to O2Jam norm).

So this is why I keep saying that "This difficulty number does nothing with actual difficulty at all" and "We should try to admit there are weighted songs".
Considering the diversity of mania players, however you modify your algorithm, there are always some people winning, and some people losing.

My suggestion is, however hard it is, and however offence you made, a certain norm should be set up. Whether you choose BMS norm (note biased, density and jackhammers counts ) or O2Jam norm (slider biased, coordination counts) or even DDR norm (hand speed counts) or a mixture of them, Don't hesitate to say that "I mean to hurt you" because what norm you choose you hurt some people who have ability that the norm doesn't emphasize on. What's more, the process of letting players finding their weighted song is fun, isn't it?

-----------------

For the DT stuff, I actually have more to say.
Why do people come here to protest about DT score problem?
Actually it's not about scoring at all (People can play DT on the first run).
DT getting higher weight neglects the design of the osu!mania system.

You may have noticed that osu!mania has the most strict judgment with MAX even on OD0 (Actually OD0 and OD10 has no difference on timing of MAX). This is intended because most people agree that osu!mania should be different to other modes by having judgment emphasized, not combo. (o!m once calculate score just like o!standard and current scoring system is later decided.) The philosophy inside is that 1 more MAX is good.

However having DT heavier weighted, though completely reasonable, is going against this. People may achieve a just-so-so S score to win more PP then a SS with 90% MAX ratio. This put osu!mania far away from it's emphasize on judgment, to the extent that people just DTing every song regardless of judgment, and people no longer care about MAX ratio. This is surely what people don't want to see. (Feature requests on DT bonus score has been rejected multiple times both by faculty and players)

So unless ppy somewhat change the mechanism to make DT version of the beatmap a whole new one and have its separate scoreboard, I suggest no bonus for DT for now.

There definitely needs to be something done with DT, and removing the pp bonus of it is one possibility that's not unlikely to happen. I completely agree, that the current situation where DT and nomod share the same leaderboard and even the same score range is bad if DT is taken into consideration for pp.

Regarding what you said about norms: What speaks against rating multiple norms? Like "aim" and "speed" in standard. Sure, in the end someone will always be degraded, but it can't hurt to find a combination of norms that makes most people happy.
Long way to go, till the algorithm is refined enough for that, though. I wish I had more time at my disposal to work on it more, I apologize for the slow changes. :/

Sorry to bother, I'm a noob and don't really have a place in these discussions,

but recently since the new system came out, I've been playing harder maps (That I get a terrible score in).
I'll get like a B or C on a map, then come back to it later and beat my personal highscore on the map, then I visibly watch my ranking drop when the screen flash updates in the song stats screen. I know the system is unstable but I don't remember this being a thing in the old system, correct me if I'm wrong. This makes me not want to play online and improve w.w""

Thing O Doom wrote:

Sorry to bother, I'm a noob and don't really have a place in these discussions,

but recently since the new system came out, I've been playing harder maps (That I get a terrible score in).
I'll get like a B or C on a map, then come back to it later and beat my personal highscore on the map, then I visibly watch my ranking drop when the screen flash updates in the song stats screen. I know the system is unstable but I don't remember this being a thing in the old system, correct me if I'm wrong. This makes me not want to play online and improve w.w""

This happened to me in the old system and I put it down to people that were lower ranks than me moving up and therefore putting me down, I assumed this only updated after i'd played my first song. There also seems to be a bug on other gamemodes where peoples PP is going down after beating there personal best, I expect this will be patched soon if it's also affecting o!m.

milky228 wrote:

Thing O Doom wrote:

Sorry to bother, I'm a noob and don't really have a place in these discussions,

but recently since the new system came out, I've been playing harder maps (That I get a terrible score in).
I'll get like a B or C on a map, then come back to it later and beat my personal highscore on the map, then I visibly watch my ranking drop when the screen flash updates in the song stats screen. I know the system is unstable but I don't remember this being a thing in the old system, correct me if I'm wrong. This makes me not want to play online and improve w.w""

This happened to me in the old system and I put it down to people that were lower ranks than me moving up and therefore putting me down, I assumed this only updated after i'd played my first song. There also seems to be a bug on other gamemodes where peoples PP is going down after beating there personal best, I expect this will be patched soon if it's also affecting o!m.

Dropping your pp by beating your score is extremely unlikely in o!m. You'd need to get just barely more score with a lot worse accuracy for that to happen.

The rank drop most likely occured due to other people passing you, as it always has been already.

Hey,

Just checked the page of my new mapset that I submitted yesterday (http://osu.ppy.sh/b/380286&m=3).
The diff rating went from Easy and Normal to Hard and Insane for the first two diffs. Does this have anything to do with the changes being made with the diff rating and ranking system ?

PyaKura wrote:

Hey,

Just checked the page of my new mapset that I submitted yesterday (http://osu.ppy.sh/b/380286&m=3).
The diff rating went from Easy and Normal to Hard and Insane for the first two diffs. Does this have anything to do with the changes being made with the diff rating and ranking system ?

Most likely, since ranked mania maps star rating is fixed right now (no more Another's as Normal's ftw) for unranked maps it may be bugged/wrong tho

No more anothers as normals, maybe, but normals as insanes. And my 'normal's are easier than quite a lot of other peoples are.

There's no rational reason why this would be harder than this (to use 2 examples of maps made by me - the latter of which was degraded from low insane to high hard recently, and the former of which is a newly uploaded beatmap), unless there's some huge and irrational boost in difficulty from the single SV change near the end of the former.

That why I told that it's currently wrong on unranked maps, it seems good on all ranked maps, but idk why it's doing wrong calculations on unranked maps, well it's still WIP so we have to wait patiently

milky228 wrote:

Thing O Doom wrote:

Sorry to bother, I'm a noob and don't really have a place in these discussions,

but recently since the new system came out, I've been playing harder maps (That I get a terrible score in).
I'll get like a B or C on a map, then come back to it later and beat my personal highscore on the map, then I visibly watch my ranking drop when the screen flash updates in the song stats screen. I know the system is unstable but I don't remember this being a thing in the old system, correct me if I'm wrong. This makes me not want to play online and improve w.w""

This happened to me in the old system and I put it down to people that were lower ranks than me moving up and therefore putting me down, I assumed this only updated after i'd played my first song. There also seems to be a bug on other gamemodes where peoples PP is going down after beating there personal best, I expect this will be patched soon if it's also affecting o!m.

Tom94 wrote:

Dropping your pp by beating your score is extremely unlikely in o!m. You'd need to get just barely more score with a lot worse accuracy for that to happen.

The rank drop most likely occured due to other people passing you, as it always has been already.

Ok, I think I can debunk this now, this morning I played a map and it shows my rank as ~7990, this was an unranked map so nothing was affected, this being just to make sure I didn't get overly surpassed while sleeping.
I then proceeded to play http://osu.ppy.sh/b/21334 (A pretty underplayed and easy map) for fun. The last time I played the map was awhile ago, and I got a low B on it, today I got a mid A on it with DT mod. After finishing the map I drop to 8006, where I currently am. There was not an accuracy decrease, I scored higher, and dropped rank, this is what I was talking about earlier. I don't care a gigantic amount about it, but I do use it as a sort of progress indicator. Cases like this are really confusing, and I'd like to know if this is intended behavior, so far though I do like the new system considerably better, I just don't remember this particular thing happening before.

If it's intended for me to drop in this manner I'll stop playing when inebriated or tired w.w""

Thing O Doom wrote:

Ok, I think I can debunk this now, this morning I played a map and it shows my rank as ~7990, this was an unranked map so nothing was affected, this being just to make sure I didn't get overly surpassed while sleeping.

I don't think playing an unranked map triggers a rank refresh.

Full Tablet wrote:

Thing O Doom wrote:

Ok, I think I can debunk this now, this morning I played a map and it shows my rank as ~7990, this was an unranked map so nothing was affected, this being just to make sure I didn't get overly surpassed while sleeping.

I don't think playing an unranked map triggers a rank refresh.

The box with rank still flashes red, and updates from what I could tell, seeing as pass/fail stats are tracked for unranked maps?

pp only updates when you get a new high score on a map. It can be your first pass on a map you never played or it can be beating your best score on another map. Only ranked maps count, unranked ones won't trigger any change.

我覺得應該要把所有分數統一!不然因為有些玩家是專練4K完7K歌根本被7K玩家壓分!排名就只有玩7K的玩家排前很不公平

http://osu.ppy.sh/u/86188 <-- This is bullshit.

No one would play dt back then, now everyone is, and he's sprung up to the top because of key mods and dt. I don't care as much about dt, I care about the key mods coming back. So many players are better than that, and I don't know why they can't be up there?

October Scream wrote:

http://osu.ppy.sh/u/86188 <-- This is bullshit. No one would play dt back then, now everyone is, and he's sprung up to the top because of key mods and dt. I don't care as much about dt, I care about the key mods coming back. So many players are better than that, and I don't know why they can't be up there?

Actually Staiain is one of the best 4K players in the world and he certanly deserves to be in top 50, even if he isn't that good at 7K, (air raid pls), but I get your point with ridiculus DT scalings. It's gotten to a point where you can get 1K pp for just playing autoconverts with 4K mod and even more with DT. It's definitly what we don't want to see. Autoconverts and DT are too heavily weighted imho

October Scream wrote:

http://osu.ppy.sh/u/86188 <-- This is bullshit.

No one would play dt back then, now everyone is, and he's sprung up to the top because of key mods and dt. I don't care as much about dt, I care about the key mods coming back. So many players are better than that, and I don't know why they can't be up there?

Can you name any players who are better than Staiain at stepmania style maps? What gives you the right to say which kind of skill is worth the most? I can understand if you disagree, that's totally valid, but try being less offensive. It's not like your opinion is worth more than that of other's.

#1 Judging from the general opinion here the DT bonus for pp will get removed for now. It might return when there has been found a solution regarding nomod plays overwriting DT, but as it is now it doesn't make much sense to have DT give a bonus.

#2 Keymods don't decrease pp gain at the moment. This will change.

Tom94 wrote:

October Scream wrote:

http://osu.ppy.sh/u/86188 <-- This is bullshit.

No one would play dt back then, now everyone is, and he's sprung up to the top because of key mods and dt. I don't care as much about dt, I care about the key mods coming back. So many players are better than that, and I don't know why they can't be up there?

Can you name any players who are better than Staiain at stepmania style maps? What gives you the right to say which kind of skill is worth the most? I can understand if you disagree, that's totally valid, but try being less offensive. It's not like your opinion is worth more than that of other's.

#1 Judging from the general opinion here the DT bonus for pp will get removed for now. It might return when there has been found a solution regarding nomod plays overwriting DT, but as it is now it doesn't make much sense to have DT give a bonus.

#2 Keymods don't decrease pp gain at the moment. This will change.

Right now, I can compare Furry. There are more players out there though, and the only reason Furry isn't high is because he is playing unranked maps it seems to me.

October Scream wrote:

Right now, I can compare Furry. There are more players out there though, and the only reason Furry isn't high is because he is playing unranked maps it seems to me.

"Only playing unranked maps" is not a valid argument. If you want performance points you have to perform on ranked maps. It's impossible to rate players skills while not having plays of them to see.

I've spectated him, and he's good. May pass Staiain. He has dt ranks on autoconverts, but 4k, just like Staiain.

October Scream wrote:

I've spectated him, and he's good. May pass Staiain. He has dt ranks on autoconverts, but 4k, just like Staiain.

Any videos?

AlexDest wrote:

Any videos?

His scarlet rose dt pass with 4k.

October Scream wrote:

AlexDest wrote:

Any videos?

His scarlet rose dt pass with 4k.

I never made a video of that so that's made up oops

That was about Furry actually Staiain.

I could record it with his permission.

The difference is still pretty big as we're talking about a PASS vs FC first try so yeah >_>

If you really think Scarlet Rose DT pass is impressive, then I suggest you go watch more videos, especially Staiain's. Your basis on what defines a "pro" player is severely flawed.

I can clear Scarlet Rose HDDT on 7K, and so can tons of other players. Does this make us all top #50 material?

ZXCV wrote:

If you really think Scarlet Rose DT pass is impressive, then I suggest you go watch more videos, especially Staiain's. Your basis on what defines a "pro" player is severely flawed.

I can clear Scarlet Rose HDDT on 7K, and so can tons of other players. Does this make us all top #50 material?

I can do that as well, but it isn't #50 worthy.

Good, so you agree that passes on DT autoconverts are completely obsolete when it comes to gauging a player's skill.
Case closed.

ZXCV wrote:

Good, so you agree that passes on DT autoconverts are completely obsolete when it comes to gauging a player's skill.
Case closed.

Didn't we decided that already? That's why it's not giving pp now.

October Scream wrote:

ZXCV wrote:

Good, so you agree that passes on DT autoconverts are completely obsolete when it comes to gauging a player's skill.
Case closed.

Didn't we decided that already? That's why it's not giving pp now.

you appeared to miss the emphasis on the word passes

so let me point it out for you



DT wasn't disabled because it is worthless. it is disabled because within the boundaries of the current scoring system, it is confusing and hard to calculate. both DT and keymod converts will return to the PP algorithm once tom94 figures out what to do with them, and this has been stated explicitly

I find it moronic how you guys are mainly blaming me and aiming most threats at me. Many other users have spoken about this, and are tired of it.

I'm just the one that spoke up. This is all of their opinions plus mine, so go scout them out and threaten them.

October Scream wrote:

I find it moronic how you guys are mainly blaming me and aiming most threats at me. Many other users have spoken about this, and are tired of it.

I'm just the one that spoke up. This is all of their opinions plus mine, so go scout them out and threaten them.

october scream, you are ignoring my post and every point we have made.

THIS IS FROM YOUR USERPAGE

if you are going to spearhead a movement to get keymods unranked, you should expect that we will confront you about these issues we have with your argument. we have not made a SINGLE threat, nor are we blaming you. we are simply asking you to explain yourself and refute what we are saying.

until you are willing to do so, this is the last i have to say on the matter

Bites wrote:

October Scream wrote:

I find it moronic how you guys are mainly blaming me and aiming most threats at me. Many other users have spoken about this, and are tired of it.

I'm just the one that spoke up. This is all of their opinions plus mine, so go scout them out and threaten them.

october scream, you are ignoring my post and every point we have made.

THIS IS FROM YOUR USERPAGE

if you are going to spearhead a movement to get keymods unranked, you should expect that we will confront you about these issues we have with your argument. we have not made a SINGLE threat, nor are we blaming you. we are simply asking you to explain yourself and refute what we are saying.

until you are willing to do so, this is the last i have to say on the matter

I'm aware of that petition. I started it because no one else would.

If you want me to explain, fine. I didn't like it when key modders would pass other players, but I have no use of that petition now actually since it's been fixed already.

DT mode now doesn't give any kind of pp bonus anymore (as most people voted in here ) and key-mods don't give any pp until their difficulty has been calculated in isolation. keymods giving pp was an oversight on my end, I apologize for that one. They will resume giving pp as soon as difficulty data is available for everything.

October Scream wrote:

I'm aware of that petition. I started it because no one else would.

If you want me to explain, fine. I didn't like it when key modders would pass other players, but I have no use of that petition now actually since it's been fixed already.

keymods will return as soon as difficulty data is there, so your petition hasn't been "fixed". They'll likely will be worth less, though, since converts away from 7K usually end up easier.

Bites wrote:

this is the last i have to say on the matter

i rescind this statement

October Scream wrote:

I'm aware of that petition. I started it because no one else would.

If you want me to explain, fine. I didn't like it when key modders would pass other players, but I have no use of that petition now actually since it's been fixed already.

you are aware though that the issue hasn't been 'fixed' yet, and this is simply a temporary solution until tom94 is able to properly calculate the difference in scoring between the different keymods? in no way is DT or keymodding going to remain unranked. i had JUST said this in an earlier post:

Bites wrote:

both DT and keymod converts will return to the PP algorithm once tom94 figures out what to do with them, and this has been stated explicitly

since you missed it, and i have reason to believe you will miss it again, let me yet again point it out to you

I have read all of your posts Bites, and it was fixed before today to a point I was fine with. I realize how stupid that petition was, so I stopped caring for it and totally forgot about it. That petition was 2 months old. I won't answer everything you post though, because either I don't know how to or I'm fine with it.

So I'm fine with the temporary solution right now.

I am glad that DT and key-mod conversions will return to the rankings at the least. I will agree as a osu!mania player who could have probably taken Staiain's speed route to reach the top 10-20 despite not being able to proficiently play above 6k -- the PP scaling could have definitely been improved a bit.

I wanted to make a suggestion about separating performance points by keys in osu!mania since you're practically playing different games when you add keys, but... one of the toughest parts about scoring in osu!mania is that most players who can play higher key beat-maps are (usually) also capable of playing lower ones as well, making separated scoreboards/ranks by key a bit redundant for those who can play 8k all the way down to 4k.

Halogen- wrote:

I am glad that DT and key-mod conversions will return to the rankings at the least. I will agree as a osu!mania player who could have probably taken Staiain's speed route to reach the top 10-20 despite not being able to proficiently play above 6k -- the PP scaling could have definitely been improved a bit.

I wanted to make a suggestion about separating performance points by keys in osu!mania since you're practically playing different games when you add keys, but... one of the toughest parts about scoring in osu!mania is that most players who can play higher key beat-maps are (usually) also capable of playing lower ones as well, making separated scoreboards/ranks by key a bit redundant for those who can play 8k all the way down to 4k.

I'm a 7K player, I suck at everything which is not 7K, sorry.

PyaKura wrote:

Halogen- wrote:

I am glad that DT and key-mod conversions will return to the rankings at the least. I will agree as a osu!mania player who could have probably taken Staiain's speed route to reach the top 10-20 despite not being able to proficiently play above 6k -- the PP scaling could have definitely been improved a bit.

I wanted to make a suggestion about separating performance points by keys in osu!mania since you're practically playing different games when you add keys, but... one of the toughest parts about scoring in osu!mania is that most players who can play higher key beat-maps are (usually) also capable of playing lower ones as well, making separated scoreboards/ranks by key a bit redundant for those who can play 8k all the way down to 4k.

I'm a 7K player, I suck at everything which is not 7K, sorry.

You are quite the outlier.

October Scream wrote:

I've spectated him, and he's good. May pass Staiain. He has dt ranks on autoconverts, but 4k, just like Staiain.

I don't think anyone other than Stian can Disregard 1.2 AA or TOML 1.6

not to mention stupid crazy scores like Vertex Gamma FC.

I mean 300 bpm streams are easily managable by most of the veteran players on Stepmania but when you take it past 400 bpm it's inhuman.

At least post a video?

Bites wrote:

both DT and keymod converts will return to the PP algorithm

is this why I fell from 350 to 5k rank ROFL
(my current BP are 2 mania 4K, all the rest non-keymodded converts except Sweet Rain [Normal])

So just to check this at this moment in time playing a map with a keymod will give you 0pp?

falkon13 wrote:

So just to check this at this moment in time playing a map with a keymod will give you 0pp?

Yes. But even if you get 0pp for doing a score right now, this very score will resume to giving pp once difficulty per-keymod has been implemented. This means you're not losing anything in the long run by playing with keymods now.

I'm just wondering why i have 277 pp while some people are at 5-7 thousand pp, why is the difference so big?
Is it because im not ranking high in songs or what?

Autoconverts don't weigh as much as mania-spec maps do. Also, you get more pp by clearing harder difficulties, especially in mania-spec mapsets.

Probably because playing autoconverts held back your improvement for osu!mania.

To me it just looks like October Scream is just a slow pp farmer that wants to ruin the game and stop actual skilled people from being able to get good ranks, rather than just suck it up and improve his own skill

Staiain wrote:

To me it just looks like October Scream is just a slow pp farmer that wants to ruin the game and stop actual skilled people from being able to get good ranks, rather than just suck it up and improve his own skill

Ouch.

Although, it's a quite deserved response considering that this thread was quiet until he called the situation bullshit and had a hissy-fit, haha

Halogen- wrote:

Staiain wrote:

To me it just looks like October Scream is just a slow pp farmer that wants to ruin the game and stop actual skilled people from being able to get good ranks, rather than just suck it up and improve his own skill

Ouch.

Although, it's a quite deserved response considering that this thread was quiet until he called the situation bullshit and had a hissy-fit, haha

I spoke up because I found it unfair for those who have skill with all key densities instead of people with one set density being in the top past those players. If anything, Staiain needs to improve his other key skills like every other player is doing instead of sticking to 4k just to farm.

"rrtyui you need to improve your skill at other games rather than sticking to osu! standard to farm PP"

do you see where I am going with this? 4k and 7k might be in osu!mania, but they are different games. Different file structures, different attentions to detail, and different player groups. Stop trying to force players to play things they might not be interested in when they are more than proficient in the game that they desire to play. You are being inconsiderate, insulting, and just downright stupid.

I will level with people: auto-converts probably should take a massive deduction or shouldn't be ranked at all. I think that's largely agreeable. Attitudes like October Scream's are fostering negativity.

Halogen- wrote:

"rrtyui you need to improve your skill at other games rather than sticking to osu! standard to farm PP"

do you see where I am going with this? 4k and 7k might be in osu!mania, but they are different games. Different file structures, different attentions to detail, and different player groups. Stop trying to force players to play things they might not be interested in when they are more than proficient in the game that they desire to play. You are being inconsiderate, insulting, and just downright stupid.

I will level with people: auto-converts probably should take a massive deduction or shouldn't be ranked at all. I think that's largely agreeable. Attitudes like October Scream's are fostering negativity.

Standard is a totally different mode. There's difficulties that have the same goal and set up as the lower difficulty, but with more hits and faster reactions.

This is osu!mania. Mania isn't just 4k, 5k, 6k, or 7k, 7+1k, or 8k. I didn't come here to show I was one of the best Guitar Hero players ever (which would just be 5k), I and so many others came here to show we have more capability to play any amount of keys thrown at us. 7k was a new concept to me, I almost only did 5k! But I practiced, and so many others did to when it came to other key densities. Learning all of this was hard for me, even 4k, but the reason I asked for this is for the people who actually practiced the wide variety of keys.

I don't give a damn if Staiain is the best 4k player in the world, and no one would give a damn about me being the best Guitar Hero player in the world! Some people are just too lazy to learn how to play with other densities. I find 4k not as easy as it looks, but I don't say f it and just stick to 7k, I practiced all of those key densities, and anyone else can to.

No, I'm not trying to force people to play like me. No, I'm not saying all of this because "I can't farm fast enough" (which is pretty stupid to do if that's why you're here). I'm just here for fun, and it feels like it's all a popularity contest the way everything is working now.

Standard is a totally different mode. There's difficulties that have the same goal and set up as the lower difficulty, but with more hits and faster reactions.

...and difficulties in o!m don't have lower difficulties set up with varying hits, HP drains, and other stats at all. People totally don't make tons of difficulties for the same keys. What are you getting at?

You're not understanding a very clear fundamental point here, so I'm going to use other rhythm games as an example to show you how your idea of key-separating is entirely incorrect. I'm sure that a number of players here are familiar with rhythm games like Dance Dance Revolution / In The Groove -- 4 "keys", and 8 "keys", Pump It Up (referred to as PIU below) -- 5 "keys" and 10 "keys", and I'll also throw another game into the mix as well -- Technomotion, which is 9 "keys". All of these games have the SAME mechanic -- tapping your foot to the corresponding panel in accordance with the music, just like all of the key values of osu!mania have the exact same mechanic -- tapping your key to the corresponding receptor in accordance with the music. Here's where your argument fails: all of these games are played under this same mechanic, but have different physical construction to the play in question. If you have no idea what I'm talking about, look up all of these games and their respective modes. Fun fact: all of the previously mentioned games with the exception of Dance Dance Revolution, have large communities that sit down and make content for these games, much like the mappers of osu! and osu!mania work on content for this game. But enough about that, let me make my point:

Calling an ITG player useless because they can't play PIU is horrible and is a point that will likely get you in a lot of fire, because they are different games. Repeating this point with PIU -- you won't do well calling a PIU weak because they can't play half-double on ITG (6-key iteration), and you won't do well calling someone out on ITG double (8-key) for not being able to play Technomotion (9-key) much like you won't be able to get away with calling a Techmotion player weak because they can't play PIU double (10-key).

Calling a regular n-key player weak because another player is capable of playing n+1 key proficiently makes no sense at all, just like saying n+1 is worse than n+2 makes no sense, and yadayadayada. They are different games executed in entirely different matters, and if you take the time to do your research on the maps for each mode, you would likely find that 4K charts are constructed much more differently than 6K/7K charts. Most players who started on games like IIDX and transferred over here might be incredible at sustaining huge densities of cohesion in maps, but throw extremely high speeds at them and they likely won't fare too well without a ton of practice. Why? Because fundamentally, they are different games. It doesn't matter that they're all contained within one classification (osu!mania) -- what matters is how the game is played (4K/5K/6K/7K/8K/xK). You likely will notice that a lot of good 7K players don't land on 4K boards because they have no interest in playing lower key values, so you tell me: where does this double standard end?

October Scream wrote:

if Staiain is the best 4k player in the world

What if this actually was the case, and one of the reasons why I stick to 4k for the most part, and play stuff on DT because I can and legit enjoy it and not because I'm trying to farm, ever considered that? Reason I became more or less the world's top 4k player is because I enjoyed it a lot and stuck with it for years, I played 6k and a bit 7k too but just because i'm not equally skilled in all modes you don't have the right to condescend me.

I played some 4k converts because o!m lacks a large variety of 4k specific charts and i ran out of stuff to play that provides an enjoyable challenge to me, and people wanted me to score on them while they spectated that day.

Halogen- wrote:

...and difficulties in o!m don't have lower difficulties set up with varying hits, HP drains, and other stats at all. People totally don't make tons of difficulties for the same keys. What are you getting at?

What I'm getting at here is that standard will still use 2 keys or two mouse clicks, all it is is there will be harder things from the same map and different mappers. It's just placed differently. Mania can have the same intensity and challenge from a 4k and a 7k, but they both have different key amounts, when standard, sticks with the same things through the whole mode, same with taiko and CtB.

Halogen- wrote:

they are different games.

This is a different game as well. I see your points, but I'm not acknowledging them or saying my minds set towards them. If you want me to say my opinions on yours, then just ask.

Since you seem like I don't understand, I'll answer one of them.

Halogen- wrote:

Calling an ITG player useless because they can't play PIU is horrible and is a point that will likely get you in a lot of fire, because they are different games. Repeating this point with PIU -- you won't do well calling a PIU weak because they can't play half-double on ITG (6-key iteration), and you won't do well calling someone out on ITG double (8-key) for not being able to play Technomotion (9-key) much like you won't be able to get away with calling a Techmotion player weak because they can't play PIU double (10-key).

I never said weak. I said lazy. If they don't want to learn how to play because they just want their same key amount, that's just lazy. If they don't want to learn because it's extremely difficult for them, then they should say and I'd understand. But instead, they defend themselves by saying "I'd like to see you try this." If they can say that, then I should be able to as well.

PIU and DDR/ITG are the same mechanics: Step on the arrows. The difference is you have 1-2 extra columns to focus on. Technomotion I'm not familiar with, but Pop n' Music I am. That's their choice of why they don't want to learn anything else. I'm finding all of your long posts getting us nowhere because all you'll say is

Halogen- wrote:

You're not understanding a very clear fundamental point here,

. Maybe I am, and I'm just not gonna reply about it.

October Scream wrote:

Mania can have the same intensity and challenge from a 4k and a 7k

thank you, case closed

Staiain wrote:

October Scream wrote:

if Staiain is the best 4k player in the world

What if this actually was the case, and one of the reasons why I stick to 4k for the most part, and play stuff on DT because I can and legit enjoy it and not because I'm trying to farm, ever considered that? Reason I became more or less the world's top 4k player is because I enjoyed it a lot and stuck with it for years, I played 6k and a bit 7k too but just because i'm not equally skilled in all modes you don't have the right to condescend me.

I played some 4k converts because o!m lacks a large variety of 4k specific charts and i ran out of stuff to play that provides an enjoyable challenge to me, and people wanted me to score on them while they spectated that day.

What if ideu-, Entozer, or some other player was the best 7k player in the world? Would they stick to just 7k?

No. They play all key amounts and enjoy it all. The only reason I ever considered you of farming was all of the Autoconverts being dt, then saying you enjoy to farm also made me think badly, and that was a bad, terrible assumption. If you want an apology, I'll give one.

I'm sorry I thought you farmed for the hell of it. You are a good 4k player, it's just not only 4k out here though, and I thought it was unfair to everyone that's played all keys.

I agree my rank was way too high for having played almost all 4k (i never said i did), but seeing as there are almost as many 4k charts as 7k charts ranked (to my knownledge) and that i did for the most part play those and not autoconverts I still feel that players like me, Halogen-, Bites etc. derserve some recogntion in the form of DT pp increase, considering we are able to get good scores on those charts (sometimes making it to the top 50 board) even with the handicap of using DT which I feel derserves recognition, pp is after all meant to be a way to objectively measure a players skill level to some degree.

I'm not here to show off or try to get the highest rank I can, if you see my play count here you can tell I am casually playing this game, I'm just stating that even if we don't play 7k as much as 4k doesn't mean we aren't high level players that should be left out of the pp system.

I accept the apology and we should put this misunderstanding behind us.

This really has gotten out of hand, and it's all because of one person (who in my opinion, really doesn't know a lot about what they're talking about). I'd much rather contribute to a meaningful discussion on how to resolve this point system algorithm so that it can fairly represent all osu!m players, 4K through 8K players alike. I feel like scaling the score multiplier objectively for auto-converts and the number of keys away from the original value is a good way to add deductions -- I mentioned something like 1.00x - .125n, where n is the number of keys away from the original number of keys from normal; this way, a 4K player can still net performance points for playing an 8K conversion, but they're only getting half as many PP as normal. This would discourage PP grinding outside of a given key-range. To compensate, RC for other key-modes should be considered such so that an even number of files exists for 4, 5, 6, 7 (maybe 8) key modes. You could expect a more even distribution of performance points handed out for players who are proficient in all modes, and you could expect higher plays for ranked files overall by those who have to play auto-converts.

If a player plays a song on DT, you can add a fixed amount and scale the values similarly -- so, if 1 - .125x is the algorithm and you wanted DT to hand out 10% more pp normally, you would say: 1.1 - .1375, etc.

Just a thought. Bouncing more ideas out could be helpful for Tom94 and I for one am in favor of getting the ball rolling so that there is a solid system in place.

Halogen- wrote:

This really has gotten out of hand, and it's all because of one person (who in my opinion, really doesn't know a lot about what they're talking about).

Well, that makes me feel better......

The reason I've flipped out was because I thought Tom94 never listened to anything some of us said, but that was a stupid thing as well. I was just stating my opinion as well originally and giving my opinions on how the pp scoring could be fixed. We talked yesterday though, and I realize he doesn't have time for everything he's working on, which I've forgotten out of frustration and anger.

I'd gladly like to get back to the main topic and for all of us to help with this.

I'd like to ask you - mania players about a certain thing. What do you think is harder/easier or same difficulty. Let's take 2 maps: 4k and 7k. Let's pretend that note density of each one is same and bpm is same. For example 4k map has a density of let's say 10 notes/s and 7k has a density of 17.5 notes/s due to having more keys. Even though the number is different for each but is the same considering we have different amount of keys. Let's also pretend these maps are without crazy patterns, just simple triplets, doubles and alternation. How would you judge the skill required to play these maps? We can also take it a step further to use all our fingers and say, use a 10k map with a density of 25 notes/s.

Under a different number of keys, an equal density would lead to the intensity being major more likely on the lower amount of keys.

After a certain density, the difference would reside in the special key, though, if you're thinking per-lane densities instead of overall density.
Hitting 4k, 6k and S8K is likely to use the same jacking abilities (With the exception on pinkies, being the weakest fingers of the hand, probably)

whereas the special 5k, 7k and 7k+1 key modes are likely to be different, even more so depending on your key setup.

I'm not sure it can be evaluated without going for a case-by-case basis.

if you have the same density per lane, then the higher keymode would most likely be quite a bit more difficult, due to needing more muscle memory and reading skill to deal with all the patterns.
if you have the same density overall, then the lower keymode would probably be quite a bit more difficult due to the fact that you have a lot more strain on less fingers.

It goes down to what I mentioned when responding to October Scream -- it's all down to pattern construction.

For example 4k map has a density of let's say 10 notes/s and 7k has a density of 17.5 notes/s due to having more keys. Even though the number is different for each but is the same considering we have different amount of keys. Let's also pretend these maps are without crazy patterns, just simple triplets, doubles and alternation.

The unfortunate matter is that you simply can't judge based off of the note density itself, because patterns are going to be inherently harder on 4K than 7K for different reasons. Despite only using index/middle or middle/ring, there are some patterns that are going to lend themselves to more difficulty. Assuming that there's no crazy patterns, and that doubles are used regularly/alternated, you can expect more patterns on 4K to be anchor-heavy (an anchor is a situation where the same arrow implicitly/explicitly repeats multiple times) because there's less room to play with layering in charts. Being that there are less pattern combinations overall on 4K, Agka brings up an arguable point:

Agka wrote:

Under a different number of keys, an equal density would lead to the intensity being major more likely on the lower amount of keys.

Before going on though, I do want to make a note that overall note density shouldn't be increased simply because there are more keys: this simply implies that you are increasing the layering by n(k) when the number of keys isn't going to dictate the map's layering: the mapper is going to dictate the map's layering. Think in a more unbiased scenario, where the number of keys is not going to dictate the layering -- let's say we have an area of the song where there is a single synth in a melody and nothing more, and it's running at 1/4 snap at 150 BPM (to make your 10 notes/s example). In an instance where we have the same structure, it's going to depend strictly on patterning. Something that frequently leans towards one hand on 6K/7K/8K is obviously going to be more difficult than just about any 4K stream because you have a massive amount of patterning permutations. Likewise, a fluent stream on 6K/7K/8K is likely going to feel easier than a fluent stream on 4K to an experienced player because the overall feel is more natural.

Assessing at 17.5 N/S is a huge way to illustrate that chart compositions on 4K/7K are extremely different. To get an idea of how fast this is: 17.5 N/S is equal to 262.5 BPM 1/4 snapped stream, which is incredibly fast. Agka's point holds true again: the intensity would feel considerably higher on 4K because there are less patterns to choose from, whereas a 6/7/8K situation would a bit smoother. Cramming 17.5 n/s requires you to hit 1050 notes in 1 minute. This is achievable under easier circumstances in higher key values: taking a look at another musical example, we'll assume that a section has a bass drum hitting every beat in a measure, snare drum hitting beats 2 and 4 every measure, clap hitting beats 2 and 4 every measure, a closed hi-hat running on the up-beat of every beat, falling in between your bass drum, snare drum, and clap in even intervals, and a melody running straight 1/4 stream (a basic/generic song structure). Most 7K/8K map would be able to handle layering this directly, accounting for every sound appropriately, but the layering would be heavy. However, the 4K map would have to compensate to make the chart reasonably playable, possibly being forced to ignore the fact that a snare/clap exists at certain points to more suitably account for the melody.

Xcrypt said it best:

Xcrypt wrote:

if you have the same density per lane, then the higher keymode would most likely be quite a bit more difficult, due to needing more muscle memory and reading skill to deal with all the patterns.
if you have the same density overall, then the lower keymode would probably be quite a bit more difficult due to the fact that you have a lot more strain on less fingers.

In a situation where there are no repeated notes over a given even interval, a per-lane density would prove that the higher key amount gets more difficulty because there are a lot more keys to handle at once. If you were to spread patterns out in such a way on 4K with a per-lane density of 4 n/s, you would have a 16 n/s stream assuming that the patterns are evenly distributed. If the same were to happen in 8k, well... you'd likely be in big trouble, haha. These are very extreme and unlikely circumstances, though.

EBAWER123 wrote:

I'd like to ask you - mania players about a certain thing. What do you think is harder/easier or same difficulty. Let's take 2 maps: 4k and 7k. Let's pretend that note density of each one is same and bpm is same. For example 4k map has a density of let's say 10 notes/s and 7k has a density of 17.5 notes/s due to having more keys. Even though the number is different for each but is the same considering we have different amount of keys. Let's also pretend these maps are without crazy patterns, just simple triplets, doubles and alternation. How would you judge the skill required to play these maps? We can also take it a step further to use all our fingers and say, use a 10k map with a density of 25 notes/s.

The number of unique key jumps in patterns should definitely be considered. The "stress" of a pattern is affected by how often new keys are introduced. "Note density" should already account for this, and if I know tom, it already does.

peppy wrote:

The number of unique key jumps in patterns should definitely be considered. The "stress" of a pattern is affected by how often new keys are introduced. "Note density" should already account for this, and if I know tom, it already does.

No matter how difficulty calculation is done, it will never function well on a ranking system where different key modes share the same ranking. Each key mode is a completely different game which requires different skills, and players are not exclusively better or worse than each other in a global "mania" way.

i.e. If I play with a similar level 4K player (being a 7K player myself), he will consistently beat me on all 4K maps we play, but if we play 7K I will consistently beat him on all maps we play. Neither of us is better or worse at "mania"; (note that I'm only mentioning 4K and 7K as those are the two most popular modes in o!m) he is better at physical precision with fast notes as well as vertical reading which are the main skills in lower key mode whereas I'm better at reading density and wide notes which are prevalent only in a higher key mode. A ranking system that tells us that one of us is either better or worse will be completely random based on arbitrary parameters and won't really reflect anything.

No matter how it's done, each key mode is a different game that requires different skills. From a programmers point of view all of those mania key modes might seem very similar and you might assume there's only a small difference between them, but from a player's point of view the difference can be as big as being twice better in one key mode than another person but twice worse than him in another. The ranking will never be able to reflect this with a shared board for all.

Again it's important to stress, this is not a minor difference, this is as big as me being unable to pass a 4K map and barely getting 70% with nofail on it while a 4K player gets 95% S rank on it, whereas me being able to get 95% on a 7K map that the same 4K player can't pass at all and barely gets a D on. A ranking system that tells us that one of us is worse than the other at "mania" is a slap in the face considering the completely different skills involved.

If it's not possible to give a separate ranking per key mode, giving at least a separate 4K and All-K board will solve A LOT of problems as the vast majority (over 99%) of players either play exclusively 4K or all key modes available. This would solve a ton of ranking issues instantly that are otherwise not solvable at all and can only be subjectively addressed in a way that will either be unfair for 4K players or for higher-key players.

I found something that shouldn't be there

Here an example:

In this case you have to notice that Zumokuta has a better Rank and a higher level (its not given in the Picture)then me

This is not a complaint against Zumokuta,this is against the PP-system

I noticed that a few guys got a better country rank then me so I decided to look at Zumokutas Top Ranks and I noticed 2 things
1.About 80-90% 4k (I think)
IF the PP-system stays like it is in this moment,then I want seperate rankings for 4k and 7k
2.I noticed this record

Zumokuta finished the map with the mod 4k,99% and round about 770.000 points

Then I played the map by myself,BUT I played with 7k,95-96% and 815.000 points
But


I got like 4pp and Zumokuta round about 50pp,but I have more points and played it with 7k(If you not already noticed,this converted map is 7k)
This get me to the point that the current system is NOT interested in the amount of points you got.
Its just interested in your accuracy ,which make it easier to get lots of pp when you are a 4k player.
I am wrong or is this really a problem in the current system?

-Kamikaze- wrote:

I think scores should be weighted higher if it's higher key count but not by much, example:
4k-0,9
5k-0,93
6k-0,96
7k-1
8k-1,03
so there will be no going for easy 4k maps in order to get pp

AGREED! I'm tired of seeing 7K players getting the higher score just because 8K has a restriction.

People thinking 4k is always easier than higher key amounts *sigh*

each key has their own difficulty and 4k is not easier than 7k
i personally think that 7k is easier compare to 4k although i started playing mania with 4k

Xenlon wrote:

I found something that shouldn't be there

Here an example:

In this case you have to notice that Zumokuta has a better Rank and a higher level (its not given in the Picture)then me

This is not a complaint against Zumokuta,this is against the PP-system

I noticed that a few guys got a better country rank then me so I decided to look at Zumokutas Top Ranks and I noticed 2 things
1.About 80-90% 4k (I think)
IF the PP-system stays like it is in this moment,then I want seperate rankings for 4k and 7k
2.I noticed this record

Zumokuta finished the map with the mod 4k,99% and round about 770.000 points

Then I played the map by myself,BUT I played with 7k,95-96% and 815.000 points
But


I got like 4pp and Zumokuta round about 50pp,but I have more points and played it with 7k(If you not already noticed,this converted map is 7k)
This get me to the point that the current system is NOT interested in the amount of points you got.
Its just interested in your accuracy ,which make it easier to get lots of pp when you are a 4k player.
I am wrong or is this really a problem in the current system?

His 770.000 points with 4K are a lot better than your 815.000 points with 7K. Why you might ask? Because 4K gives a big score penalty! Relative to the maximum possible score he could have gotten he did a LOT better than you. Despite the 4K map being rated quite a bit easier than the 7K version (I checked!) his better play by a huge margin made up for that and earned him more pp.

Ok,I played this map again but with 4k and got 765.000 points.
I personally think the 7k version is harder then the 4k,but thats not the point.
The first time I got 815.000 points and thats more then 765.000,so the first try is my Top Score.
Does this mean that I have to play some maps with 4k and 99% ,when I could pass them with 7k and 95-96%,just for the Top Score?
I think the same 7k converted map is always easier in 4k then in 7k ,but I want to play with 7k,because 4k isn't challenging me enough.
(This is my opinion,because I never saw a converted map that is easier in 7k then in 4k)

Taronia wrote:

-Kamikaze- wrote:

I think scores should be weighted higher if it's higher key count but not by much, example:
4k-0,9
5k-0,93
6k-0,96
7k-1
8k-1,03
so there will be no going for easy 4k maps in order to get pp

AGREED! I'm tired of seeing 7K players getting the higher score just because 8K has a restriction.

Actually I disagree with this after rethinking it number of times, but anyway the problem is that AC's give too much pp and should we wieghted less, all slow streams maps like this or this are giving so much pp, that they tend to overtake good scores on hard mania charts

I consider myself a mostly 7k player, however most of my pp comes from 4k maps. I find it way easier to rank up playing 4k than 7k. I also don't get why hard maps with ~85% give nothing but easy maps with ~95% give 10 pp.

My Gigantic OTN Ento's Another clear gib 0 pp ;_;

#shittyaccandscore

Anyways, yeah the algorithm is considering sone patterns to be hard in ACs.

Xenlon wrote:

Ok,I played this map again but with 4k and got 765.000 points.
I personally think the 7k version is harder then the 4k,but thats not the point.
The first time I got 815.000 points and thats more then 765.000,so the first try is my Top Score.
Does this mean that I have to play some maps with 4k and 99% ,when I could pass them with 7k and 95-96%,just for the Top Score?
I think the same 7k converted map is always easier in 4k then in 7k ,but I want to play with 7k,because 4k isn't challenging me enough.
(This is my opinion,because I never saw a converted map that is easier in 7k then in 4k)

Judging from this and the mostly similar opinions I'll have adjust the difficulty algorithm, so it can give more sensible values for 4K vs 7K maps. It should be noted, though, that the 7K version already _IS_ considered harder. Just not by enough to outweight the score differences you had relative to the maximum possible scores.

My thoughts as a noob mania player:
4k is overrated at the low level, but underrated for high tier maps.
After accumulating over 1.5k plays of 7k, I tried out 4k for maybe ~150 plays. Now I have 18 4k maps in my top 20 performances (and more beyond that, but I'm too lazy to count). I mean, I probably have an advantage with 4k-type modes due to my taiko experience, but I really don't think it should outscale my 7k performances that easily.
The point is, all of the 4k maps I played are extremely easy to read with simple patterns - yet they are rated as harder than much more complex 7k maps with a similar overall note density. I'm making assumptions about your calculation methods here, but maybe you could scale down the weight of per-lane density for low density values (keep it the same or even increase it for really high density)?
On the other hand, the hardest 4k maps are weirdly underrated. Imperishable Night 2006, Bangin' Burst and Kamui are all listed as "I"-level difficulties instead of "X". That can't be right, can it?

My top 7k performance also feels a bit out-of-place. Personally I feel like my FC on Utakata, Ai no Mahoroba [LV.14] should be my top performance, but the algorithm considers Stella [Pro Drum] better. I assume it's because of accuracy since Stella uses OD9, but even so, Stella has a slightly inflated star rating in my opinion. The map uses a lot of chords, but that's about it. They are not even hard chords at all, since most of them are symmetrical and extremely repetitive. And I didn't even FC or anything. So maybe reduce difficulty of highly symmetrical maps if others get the same impression from higher level maps?

to give an easier example, think of a song with 1000 key counts on both 4k and 7k equally distributed on both hands.

now think that 900 keys are all in the left hand in 7k while still the same in 4k.

hope you get the picture.

also I find those maps MEANT for mania a lot easier to get 300s than those that came from autoconverts. if nothing else, I think many mania players are really, really, REALLY hungry for harder maps. Everything seems very easy to get an S.

There seams to be something very broken about easy mod. I first played this map : https://osu.ppy.sh/b/279134 with the EZ mode and got a low 300k score with a 88,6% accuracy which then appeared on my top5 best performance on my profile. So, I decided to beat my score without the mode to get an even better performance. I got 2x my old score BUT a 87,8% accuracy and then I suddenly lost 22 global pp. When I went to my profile, my score went from being worth 180~pp to 116pp.

It doesn't look like the EZ mod gives any kind of penalty and thus can be used to pass maps way easily and still get a better performance then when you don't use it...

Luna wrote:

My thoughts as a noob mania player:
4k is overrated at the low level, but underrated for high tier maps.
After accumulating over 1.5k plays of 7k, I tried out 4k for maybe ~150 plays. Now I have 18 4k maps in my top 20 performances (and more beyond that, but I'm too lazy to count). I mean, I probably have an advantage with 4k-type modes due to my taiko experience, but I really don't think it should outscale my 7k performances that easily.
The point is, all of the 4k maps I played are extremely easy to read with simple patterns - yet they are rated as harder than much more complex 7k maps with a similar overall note density. I'm making assumptions about your calculation methods here, but maybe you could scale down the weight of per-lane density for low density values (keep it the same or even increase it for really high density)?
On the other hand, the hardest 4k maps are weirdly underrated. Imperishable Night 2006, Bangin' Burst and Kamui are all listed as "I"-level difficulties instead of "X". That can't be right, can it?

My top 7k performance also feels a bit out-of-place. Personally I feel like my FC on Utakata, Ai no Mahoroba [LV.14] should be my top performance, but the algorithm considers Stella [Pro Drum] better. I assume it's because of accuracy since Stella uses OD9, but even so, Stella has a slightly inflated star rating in my opinion. The map uses a lot of chords, but that's about it. They are not even hard chords at all, since most of them are symmetrical and extremely repetitive. And I didn't even FC or anything. So maybe reduce difficulty of highly symmetrical maps if others get the same impression from higher level maps?

I plan to make quite some changes to the mania difficulty algorithm. Yes, easier 4K diffs are overrated and higher ones underrated. And yes, the algorithm overrates certain patterns in general by a lot, which is bad.

Fudgyking wrote:

There seams to be something very broken about easy mod. I first played this map : https://osu.ppy.sh/b/279134 with the EZ mode and got a low 300k score with a 88,6% accuracy which then appeared on my top5 best performance on my profile. So, I decided to beat my score without the mode to get an even better performance. I got 2x my old score BUT a 87,8% accuracy and then I suddenly lost 22 global pp. When I went to my profile, my score went from being worth 180~pp to 116pp.

It doesn't look like the EZ mod gives any kind of penalty and thus can be used to pass maps way easily and still get a better performance then when you don't use it...

Easy increases the HitWindow and decreases the accuracy pp you can get for your score by doing that. At your accuracy of ~88% you barely get any accuracy point anyway, so Easy won't really make a difference apart from allowing you to pass the map more easily. You would probably get a lot more pp by getting better scores and accuracy on slightly easier maps. Mind trying out and confirming, denying?

Can someone compare Easy with nomod while doing higher accuracy runs? Anything from 90% - 100% is fine, more feedback is always good.

Tom94 wrote:

Easy increases the HitWindow and decreases the accuracy pp you can get for your score by doing that. At your accuracy of ~88% you barely get any accuracy point anyway, so Easy won't really make a difference apart from allowing you to pass the map more easily. You would probably get a lot more pp by getting better scores and accuracy on slightly easier maps. Mind trying out and confirming, denying?

Can someone compare Easy with nomod while doing higher accuracy runs? Anything from 90% - 100% is fine, more feedback is always good.

Ok here is my feeback. I played this map until I somehow manage to beat my EZ accuracy with no mod and I finally managed to get a 89,25% accuracy. I then went to my profile to see how much pp it was worth now and..... it was worth a mere 158pp; way less than the 181pp my 88,61% EZ mod score gave me. I do not understand how this can be possible if there is truly a decrease in the accuracy pp.

I do not think it is very logical that a EZ pass with ~88% accuracy can even be CLOSE to be worth the same amount of pp as a 89% accuracy with no mod (89% is not even that bad imo).

Did you maybe have a significantly higher max combo or less misses in your Easy run?

Luna wrote:

Did you maybe have a significantly higher max combo or less misses in your Easy run?

In my easy run, I had a 149x max combo and 41 misses while in my no mod best score, I have a 177x max combo and 42 misses. So, yeah. Nothing that major here

Luna wrote:

Did you maybe have a significantly higher max combo or less misses in your Easy run?

Combo / misses don't really matter in osu!mania. The actual score relative to the maximum possible score is looked at (non-linear before someone complains ) and accuracy is factored in, too, by a smaller portion. (See the wiki.)

Does SV/BPM changes affect pp?

Its impossible to change scrolling speed while playing now, but as I remember It was possible to do while pausing a game (so, we have pretty high scores on "bpm jumpy" maps, now its pretty hard to get high acc on maps like this http://osu.ppy.sh/s/107565 because of scrolling speed).

EZ should definitely be nuked, 50% like its score modifier. I went to go try it and now I'm stuck with 3 plays where all I did was spam for a pass in my top 10. It's literally free pp, even new players can spam for passes on EZ...

HT also has a similar issue it seems.

EDIT:

Actually nevermind, I think it's getting halved/reduced accordingly. Still feels a bit much IMO.

EDIT2:

Also requesting/suggesting EZ nerf. It's ridiculous, I shot up by 300pp or so with it.

Hello!

Easy mod's effect on osumania PP scoring has become a pretty prevalent point of discussion around #osumania.

Right now Easy mod doesn't take off nearly as many PP points as it needs to. It has become a huge strategy to simply put on Easy mod and spam your way through a very difficult map and reap all of the points.

Case in point, look at my top PP earning score:



I'm gonna miss those points.

Tidek wrote:

Does SV/BPM changes affect pp?

Its impossible to change scrolling speed while playing now, but as I remember It was possible to do while pausing a game (so, we have pretty high scores on "bpm jumpy" maps, now its pretty hard to get high acc on maps like this http://osu.ppy.sh/s/107565 because of scrolling speed).

Bumping this and 1 more question, does DT in future will affect PP? Because atm its pretty useless mod to use because you are not getting any bonus for map difficulty...

Tidek wrote:

Tidek wrote:

Does SV/BPM changes affect pp?

Its impossible to change scrolling speed while playing now, but as I remember It was possible to do while pausing a game (so, we have pretty high scores on "bpm jumpy" maps, now its pretty hard to get high acc on maps like this http://osu.ppy.sh/s/107565 because of scrolling speed).

Bumping this and 1 more question, does DT in future will affect PP? Because atm its pretty useless mod to use because you are not getting any bonus for map difficulty...

Was already implemented, but then removed. And tbh I don't like the fact of playing w/ mods to get more points.

It would be okay if DT would have it's own scoreboard, right now it's pointless because pepole who were going for #1's can't get pp from DT plays even if they can FC with it, also we didn't really get any response about EZ mod and I don't see changes in mod key weighting, is this thread already abandoned? D:

-Kamikaze- wrote:

also we didn't really get any response about EZ mod and I don't see changes in mod key weighting, is this thread already abandoned? D:

There haven't been updates to the pp system for any of the modes in a while, so don't worry - Tom is not specifically ignoring this thread or anything. I'm assuming he's busy with personal stuff; just give it some time and eventually updates will happen.

I just lost 1 pp by beating my best score on a map. My accuracy went down, so maybe it's that. If it is, then scoring needs to be looked at. One or the other of pp and scoring needs to be fixed so that this situation doesn't happen.

mathl33t wrote:

I just lost 1 pp by beating my best score on a map. My accuracy went down, so maybe it's that. If it is, then scoring needs to be looked at. One or the other of pp and scoring needs to be fixed so that this situation doesn't happen.

It's already been determined that score alone is not an accurate measure of performance and that your best score may not mean your best performance.

However, I believe that fixing that issue would require either a scoreboard wipe (of over 6 years of scores, since I'm pretty sure the issue applies to all modes) or storing two scores on the server, which would drastically increase the space used.

It's a problem that we may have no choice but to deal with.

Meseki wrote:

mathl33t wrote:

I just lost 1 pp by beating my best score on a map. My accuracy went down, so maybe it's that. If it is, then scoring needs to be looked at. One or the other of pp and scoring needs to be fixed so that this situation doesn't happen.

It's already been determined that score alone is not an accurate measure of performance and that your best score may not mean your best performance.

However, I believe that fixing that issue would require either a scoreboard wipe (of over 6 years of scores, since I'm pretty sure the issue applies to all modes) or storing two scores on the server, which would drastically increase the space used.

It's a problem that we may have no choice but to deal with.

Funny thing that I've beaten my Utakata, Ai no Mahoroba [LV.28] S (95,3%, 800k pts) with an A (94,92%, 821k) and it went from 230pp worth to 237pp. I believe acc has nothing to do with it, it's just weighted by score.

IIRC Tom said acc DOES have to do with it, but it's far more negligible than actual score.