No I'm fine. I want to flip as town so everyone can see that pieguy is just voting me for a really weak excuse.
pieguy1372 wrote:
except I haven't even mentioned gut feeling except for when you ask what my initial reasons for voting you were or ask I elaborate on the reasons. which you've mentioned like 12 times instead of asking new questions
pieguy1372 wrote:
wait what the hell am I even saying, I already set it up obv, I'm mostly just too tired to do anything right now cause it's 2:21 PM and I've been up since 8:30 PM yesterday
anyway, cut to the chase
after thinking about it NL might not be such a good idea cause there might not even be a vig/PGO or they both might kill someone. also seems it would delay information, it'd be better to get the game moving just so new stuff can happen
okay I swear I saw a post by RB saying that he was for NL and then I saw a post saying that he didn't think NL was a good idea. also seems RB isn't posting quite as much as the others. also Qua was all for NL then said something like "scumhunting should be enough for us to lynch mafia" which I'm not even sure how that could work together..
Tsukasa seems to be actually doing stuff so he's town for me. Caligno seems to be doing stuff too, I think Rantai is town for reasons, and imo fartownik is leaning town for me due to gut feeling. also it's reasonable to think that Tanz just screwed up or wasn't paying attention or was tired etc.
we've spent all this time just arguing over NL or not NL, we need to do something
vote: RB see above for the idea, also it's my gut feeling. if anyone sees something wrong with my analysis let me know plz cause I probably messed something up
Does this mean Tanz is not telling the truth? How do you know Quarezha is being honest?Tsukasa wrote:
I don't want to disclose what happened since it's pretty much like claiming and I never want that.
Though Qua is actually telling the truth
I've posted my reads and started the whole thing with RBTsukasa wrote:
Or I could follow RB on pieguy because he's being lurky and he only posts to defend himself
Is what made me think we have 3 mystery roles.fartownik wrote:
My take on what happened here:
If the claims are true, we had 3 Mystery Roles: Caligno (Cop), Tanz (Something), Quarezha (Something).
However, Tsukasa is saying that he was not protected by Tanz. But would rather not claim yet. He also says he can clear me 90%.pieguy1372 wrote:
that's assuming Tanz is a doctor and he protected Tsukasa, so we'd get Qua (now a secret role), Tanz, and Caligno who died
for me this means Tanz and Qua are probably both town, it's not in mafia's favor to claim what their target was, unless one of them is outright lying
Because RB was about to be lynched and I thought he was not scum?Rantai wrote:
About Fart, those last minute vote/unvotes was basically unnecessary, makes me wonder why he did those.
I didn't know the votecount at that moment, I thought it will be safer if I just unvote, why wouldn't I do that? Should I've risked him being lynched off when I was not sure?Rantai wrote:
Except. RB was in no danger of being lynched at the time (3 for NL). Actually for that matter, no matter what you voted, it would have made no difference to the outcome.
Maybe one or two other more Mystery Roles are hiding and have nothing significant nor important to report so far?Rantai wrote:
I guess the only thing for him is that having 2 mystery roles seems like a fairly low number but then again we have secret roles so maybe it makes sense?.
okay no. you have done nothing but come up with bullshit reasoning to get me lynched. you also haven't even given any logical response to anything I've countered, alsoRaging Bull wrote:
Why cant we just vote pieguy ? He kept contradicting himself
I'm doing a lot less hopping around than you did pieguy, your vote on me was based on me rather no lynching or lynch. As you can see, I didn't even vote for any of them. I never made some finalized voting yet because I'm still for lynching someone.nope it's cause you just magically agree with everything that comes up. when people wanted to NL, you wanted to NL. when people wanted to lynch, you suddenly wanted to lynch. easiest way for mafia to be undetected is to just follow what everyone else does
I really don't care if you guys think this is OMGUS. pieguy is just reading scum to me. He's using my "no lynch -> lynch" flip flop as an excuse when he actually did it himself "RB - > Calingo -> RB" flip flop vote.that vote was just temporary till I got an answer from caligno. no point in not voting him for then when there's a possibility what he said is outright impossible
Read my post. How he got his read on Tanz is irrelevant.Questioning him was just trying to get towncred to me.makes it seem like I'm doing something illogical when I'm not
So I can say it backwards, why not use principles earlier than later? I don't think it benefits town to uphold information.misquotes my statement implying I said we should just wait around for a whole day when I never said that
Yet a simple question would suffice, but apparently voting someone who is nowhere near lynch at all = pressure. I will never ever understand that because it makes no sense.voting someone = more pressure than not voting someone, again tries to make it seem like I'm doing something illogical when I'm not
I thought it's funny how you unvoted NL without a reason until the next post. If it was RVS, okay then, but what? Usually you provide a reason for voting and unvoting.cause I realized NL was a bad idea, I unvoted NL in advance and posted my reasoning with my next post, since it was a vote/unvote I wanted to put it there first
It's all you. Don't scum paint anyone else.posted this in response to me offering valid reasoning
And if you're curious, I tried breaking your entire arguement on voting for me, and all you can ever default to is gut feeling. Have some actual solid evidence.I mentioned everything above previously and he just says I "default to gut feeling"
What?okay so here I ask him where I mentioned gut feeling after he started accusing me with BS reasons, and he srsly quoted my original vote and that was it. afaik we're supposed to post reasoning with votes
I don't care what you think of my role now, but when I flip town, please lynch him.
I want to flip as town so everyone can see that pieguy is just voting me for a really weak excuse.
But once I flip town, my job is done.people who say this are 99.99% mafia
that was a joke cause Qua blatantly followed RB's BS reasonsBRBP wrote:
inb4 Qua + RB scumteam
You've probably realized by now that your points on RB aren't really worth much, and Qua is basically confirmed, so you attacked me.attacking someone several times with BS reasoning, misquoting or outright ignoring what they said in defense, and outright not responding to questions isn't worth much? did you even read the thread
And to me this seems more like an attempt to attack everyone who's willing to vote you (RB -> Qua (joke, maybe not?)-> Me). You've probably realized by now that your points on RB aren't really worth much, and Qua is basically confirmed, so you attacked me.no, it's based off the reasoning that the best way for mafia to go unnoticed is to follow others
Your reasoning comes down toa lot of people weren't posting cause they weren't there. you, on the other hand, were
*Being one of the people who's willing to vote you
*Being one of the people who didn't participate in your fight (7 out of 9)
I have a headache from this whole thing too, roflRantai wrote:
Pieguy's and RB's argument reminds me of the headaches school mafia gave me ._. (I'll go through it later when I'm not exhausted)
Rantai wrote:
I'd rather vote for Tanz to be honest.
Pieguy's and RB's argument reminds me of the headaches school mafia gave me ._. (I'll go through it later when I'm not exhausted)
pieguy1372 wrote:
attacking someone several times with BS reasoning, misquoting or outright ignoring what they said in defense, and outright not responding to questions isn't worth much? did you even read the thread
Raging Bull wrote:
Get your RNG ready.
Read my post. How he got his read on Tanz is irrelevant.Questioning him was just trying to get towncred to me.
So I can say it backwards, why not use principles earlier than later? I don't think it benefits town to uphold information.
He's using my "no lynch -> lynch" flip flop as an excuse when he actually did it himself "RB - > Calingo -> RB" flip flop vote.there were others just too lazy to find more