t+pazolite feat. Rizna - Distorted Lovesong [Osu|Taiko]‬ · forum‬

Makar

osu! Alumni

Joined February 2011

Makar 2013-05-04T21:04:33+00:00

Rebubbled!

Side note incase people complain:
AIMod says there is an image in the song folder that is not used, but in the storyboard script there is an animation line which starts at name_0000, which means it uses name_00000, name_00001, name_00002, etc. so this is a bug in AIMod

Low

2,006 posts

Joined July 2011

Low 2013-05-05T05:10:13+00:00

was going to wait until this was at bubble #2 but lo and behold, something caught my eye. all the extra timing sections near the start are un-needed. all the timing sections you need are the following:

01:27:047 - 7/4 time signature
01:31:547 - this one is most likely 3/4 (heavy beat lands on 01:33:047)
01:33:047 - 4/4

i know the first one is definitely correct, but the other two are debatable. it'd be nice if someone could see if i'm correct or improve my timing if it is incorrect. have to pop this for now and will do a full mod later and then it'll get bubble #2 probably and everything will be fine. sorry ;(

Makar

osu! Alumni

2,258 posts

Joined February 2011

Makar 2013-05-05T05:44:39+00:00

why can't everybody just agree on a timing already qq
wtb timing and music theory experts

Lybydose

osu! Alumni

2,024 posts

Joined January 2009

Lybydose 2013-05-05T05:53:58+00:00

Jacob wrote:
01:27:047 - 7/4 time signature

yes, except it starts at 01:21:047 - (did you copy the wrong time?)

Jacob wrote:
01:31:547 - this one is most likely 3/4 (heavy beat lands on 01:33:047)
01:33:047 - 4/4

Put the 4/4 at 01:34:047 instead. 01:33:047 (1,2,3,4,5) is structured exactly the same as the previous section (which is set to 3/4) so there's no reason it should be changing there.

so basically:

01:21:047 - 7/4
01:31:547 - 3/4
01:34:047 - 4/4

RLC

Elite Mapper

1,007 posts

Joined August 2011

Topic Starter

RLC 2013-05-05T18:36:33+00:00

tetsutaro wrote:
01:21:047 ~ 01:31:547 - To me there is a sudden decrease in density of bar lines with you using 7/4. I would suggest implementing alternating 4/4 and 3/4 stanzas (Making it like bar line --> 4 beats --> bar line --> 3 beats --> bar line --> 4 beats...).
Similar structures to deal with abnormal bar length has been seen in authentic maps such as Soul Calibur III New Legend and GERMINATION.

This is the reason for the additional uninherited timing sections--at least in the taiko. I changed the standard diff too, for the sake of consistency.

Not sure how to proceed. Are different redlines allowed in taiko and standard? Or should I keep both as is... or change both back to the original 7/4 design (as in Jacob and Lyby's posts)?

halp plz ;; eye'm confuzd

Low

2,006 posts

Joined July 2011

Low 2013-05-05T18:43:19+00:00

change both back to 7/4

RLC

Elite Mapper

1,007 posts

Joined August 2011

Topic Starter

RLC 2013-05-05T18:52:51+00:00

>_>

done.

Backfire

3,208 posts

Joined February 2010

Backfire 2013-05-05T19:04:34+00:00

How many unbubbles.

How many unbubbles.

Last edited by Backfire 2018-11-27T00:12:59+00:00, edited 1 time in total.

Low

2,006 posts

Joined July 2011

Low 2013-05-05T19:40:31+00:00

[Taikocalypse DX]
06:34:843 (1,1,1,1,1,1,1,2,3,4,1,2) - please delete this section. it's awkward to play and the timing for this section (or lack therof) is incorrect. each circle practically needs its own individual timing section to be spot on.

[Love]
02:48:047 (1,1,1) - in my opinion, this anti-jump is really difficulty to sightread and play properly due to the very fast ongoing pace of the map at that point in the song. a good solution would be to place a slider at 02:48:047 that repeats at 02:48:297. it would also be neat to place the reverse of the slider on the end of (1) in the next combo, like this ((7) is the repeat slider, you just can't see the repeat).
06:48:422 (1) - you should never ever map to a vocal part that isn't actually part of the main beat. this isn't timed correctly either (or does it even have a correct timing)? yeah, you should probably remove this.

this should be good for bubble #2 since the uninherited timing section changes didn't require the resnapping of any notes.

Backfire

3,208 posts

Joined February 2010

Backfire 2013-05-05T20:09:52+00:00

~~Just delete the section, RLC. He's right about it. It's fine.~~

hahaha no.

Last edited by Backfire 2013-05-05T21:36:51+00:00, edited 2 times in total.

RLC

Elite Mapper

1,007 posts

Joined August 2011

Topic Starter

RLC 2013-05-05T20:11:03+00:00

Jacob wrote:
[Taikocalypse DX]
06:34:843 (1,1,1,1,1,1,1,2,3,4,1,2) - please delete this section. it's awkward to play and the timing for this section (or lack therof) is incorrect. each circle practically needs its own individual timing section to be spot on. this was discussed extensively with some other BATs--the timing is accurate down to 1/16 (thank you charles), and the low OD makes this relatively easy to get 300s on. Most testers have not had problems with this section at all. also, removing it just makes that break REALLY long and boring--in the standard diff, there's at least an SB to keep the player/viewer's interest, but the taiko would just have a long minute of nothingness ;;

[Love]
02:48:047 (1,1,1) - in my opinion, this anti-jump is really difficulty to sightread and play properly due to the very fast ongoing pace of the map at that point in the song. a good solution would be to place a slider at 02:48:047 that repeats at 02:48:297. it would also be neat to place the reverse of the slider on the end of (1) in the next combo, like this ((7) is the repeat slider, you just can't see the repeat). the problem with sliders is that they give more "connected" flow and I wanted disconnected flow there. The weird 1/4 effect in the background fades away at 02:48:047 - and suddenly comes back at 02:48:547 - , so I wanted to emphasize that. Anyway, I spread out the notes across the screen. (surprisingly enough, no one i watched test the map misread the antijumps--even on first play--but I suppose they are a bit too risky.)
06:48:422 (1) - you should never ever map to a vocal part that isn't actually part of the main beat. this isn't timed correctly either (or does it even have a correct timing)? yeah, you should probably remove this. yeah this is pretty weird--removed.

this should be good for bubble #2 since the uninherited timing section changes didn't require the resnapping of any notes.

thank you!

those

3,135 posts

Joined November 2010

those 2013-05-05T20:28:41+00:00

Makar wrote:
music theory experts

Hello.

RLC wrote:
This is the reason for the additional uninherited timing sections--at least in the taiko. I changed the standard diff too, for the sake of consistency.

This is a fair way to aid Taiko gameplay since 7/4 measures are really long. In theory, 7/4 measures are simply made up of a combination of 2/4, 3/4, and 4/4 groupings, and this song happens to use a 4/4 to 3/4 as a 7/4 measure. Both would be considered fine if you consider Taiko playability, and this is one of the cases where I would allow a red line inconsistency across all diffs.

Lybydose wrote:
01:33:047 (1,2,3,4,5) is structured exactly the same as the previous section [...]

01:33:047 - 4/4 should go here instead of 01:34:047 - . For the reason Lybydose provided above, what that's trying to accomplish is making the time signature fit the map, when it should be the other way around. It is very clear that 01:33:047 - is a single 4/4 measure and not a 3/4 measure with an extra beat.

Would also include a 4/4 at 01:35:047 - for the sake of restarting stanza count. Good practice, even though you can only dream of playing this at 1.5x rate.

RLC

Elite Mapper

1,007 posts

Joined August 2011

Topic Starter

RLC 2013-05-05T20:39:57+00:00

fixed 4/4 switch as stated by those

didn't change taiko back to 4/4 and 3/4 combination though, since the inconsistency between diffs seems to be too controversial, w/e.

didn't add extra 4/4 line because as far as I can tell, that wouldn't really do anything, osu!-wise? correct me if i'm wrong.

Low

2,006 posts

Joined July 2011

Low 2013-05-05T20:49:05+00:00

SPOILER

h̳ͬ̔̈̿̾̽̀͝o̫̠͂̇̌͊̆̓ͫ̾̄l̡̙͎̻̈ͫͥ̔̍ͭ͗d̬̠͔̬̤̥ͫ̊͊̊ ̸̳̮͕̎ͮͧͮ͐̔̎͟͝ḿ̢̦͈̹ͬ̋̐͐̔̎́ͅe̵̻̠͖͚̻̰͇̭͉̓ͯ̋͋ͩͦ͑͘

#2. i also fixed the artist and romanized artist with RLC. not much was changed, so i feel it's safe to give it the second bubble

Aurele

Global Moderator

7,606 posts

Joined January 2011

Aurele 2013-05-05T23:14:11+00:00

I so want to give a flame to this map ;w;

butyouguysareconfusingmewiththetiming

RLC

Elite Mapper

1,007 posts

Joined August 2011

Topic Starter

RLC 2013-05-05T23:23:25+00:00

Gabe wrote:
I so want to give a flame to this map ;w;

butyouguysareconfusingmewiththetiming

the previous posts were all dealing with the time signature changes; as it is right now, all of the time signatures are correct

Seph

Seph 2013-05-06T00:52:14+00:00

NO APPROVE BETCH AHEUAHEAUEHAU

RLC

Elite Mapper

1,007 posts

Joined August 2011

Topic Starter

RLC 2013-05-06T00:53:27+00:00

calm down, gabe and I are working on it ok

Sakurai Miyo

3,093 posts

Joined October 2011

Sakurai Miyo 2013-05-06T01:01:43+00:00

81047,250,4,1,1,60,1,0 - make it 7/4

82047,250,3,1,1,60,1,0
82797,250,4,1,1,60,1,0
83797,250,3,1,1,60,1,0
84547,250,4,1,1,60,1,0
85547,250,3,1,1,60,1,0
86297,250,4,1,1,60,1,0
87297,250,3,1,1,60,1,0
88047,250,4,1,1,60,1,0
89047,250,3,1,1,60,1,0
89797,250,4,1,1,60,1,0 - remove those

90797,250,3,1,1,60,1,0 - move to 91547

do the same as taiko

Last edited by Sakurai Miyo 2013-05-06T01:03:02+00:00, edited 1 time in total.

RLC

Elite Mapper

1,007 posts

Joined August 2011

Topic Starter

RLC 2013-05-06T01:02:22+00:00

pretty sure timing has already been changed?

Sakurai Miyo

3,093 posts

Joined October 2011

Sakurai Miyo 2013-05-06T01:03:40+00:00

RLC wrote:
pretty sure timing has already been changed?

the timing measure? no kds needed for that

Aurele

Global Moderator

7,606 posts

Joined January 2011

Aurele 2013-05-06T01:04:40+00:00

...that's not cool. I was about to post with the flame icon!

ircmod

19:15 RLC: hi hi hi
19:15 Gabe: hi hi hi
19:15 RLC: i can clarify
19:15 RLC: anything
19:15 RLC: you need me to clarify
19:15 RLC: about the timing
19:17 RLC: D:
19:17 Gabe: o,o
19:18 RLC: https://osu.ppy.sh/forum/p/2283130 D:
19:31 RLC: pls respond pls /runs
19:32 Gabe: o:
19:32 RLC: :o
19:33 Gabe: wtf, I always write: disturbed
19:33 Gabe: instead of disturted
19:33 RLC: huh
19:33 RLC: i used to always write ogm instead of omg
19:33 RLC: especially when i was spamming people
19:39 Gabe: hm
19:39 Gabe: can you tell me why there's an inherited timing point here?
19:39 Gabe: and the next three timings
19:39 Gabe: they seems.. useless?
19:44 RLC: hi
19:44 RLC: sorry i was afk
19:44 RLC: uh
19:44 RLC: where
19:44 Gabe: 00:43:547 - 
19:44 Gabe: oops, forgot to link
19:44 Gabe: =v=b
19:44 RLC: ah those
19:44 RLC: i used those to help me storyboard hitsounds
19:44 RLC: i think i can remove them without breaking anything now
19:45 RLC: oh wait i remember now
19:45 RLC: yeah there used to be sliders there
19:45 RLC: so i used the green lines
19:45 RLC: to make one of the ticks give a different noise
19:45 RLC: so i guess i can remove them now
19:46 Gabe: yeah
19:54 Gabe: I'm currently watching your map in 50% playback
19:54 Gabe: it looks good
19:55 RLC: o:
19:55 Gabe: a little suggestion, 03:43:047 (8) - what do you think on adding a new combo here? Since it's having a different sound from the previous notes, it could be isolated, I guess.
19:55 Gabe: a little suggestion, 03:43:047 (8) - what do you think on adding a new combo here? Since it's having a different sound from the previous notes, it could be isolated, I guess.
19:55 RLC: sure
19:55 RLC: it would fit with 03:47:047 (1) - these other ones
19:57 Gabe: yeah
19:58 Gabe: 04:19:047 (1) - the end of this spinner is way too close from the next notes,
19:59 Gabe: since there's three spinners in a row, it might be a little confusing
19:59 RLC: the notes appear on top of the spinner though; so it should be fine
19:59 RLC: and it's a kickslider
19:59 RLC: so it's relatively lenient
19:59 Gabe: so, since there's a soft sound to 04:22:422 - it would sound g-
19:59 RLC: o
19:59 Gabe: well
19:59 RLC: that's good actually
19:59 RLC: yeah
19:59 Gabe: LOL
19:59 RLC: shortening the spinner by 1/2
19:59 RLC: LOL
20:01 RLC: i'm going to go eat a quick dinner
20:01 Gabe: 04:26:047 (1,1) - with the circles between them, you are moving them some grids down, but you have kept the same emplacement for those three sliders, but you have reversed the second slider
20:01 Gabe: 04:26:047 (1,1) - with the circles between them, you are moving them some grids down, but you have kept the same emplacement for those three sliders, but you have reversed the second slider
20:01 Gabe: oh, alright
20:01 RLC: keep on listing whatever you find; i'll address them when i get back
20:01 Gabe: Okay!
20:01 Gabe: Have a good meal c:
20:01 RLC: c: thanks
20:02 Gabe: like said, you could also try to make the same thing with those sliders, by moving them some grids down
20:06 Gabe: 04:56:547 (3) - This is only a suggestion, I have no objection with the current emplacement. Since you have made a blanket with both of these sliders, 04:55:422 (2,4) - , you could also try to blanket this slider with the beginning of this one: 04:56:172 (2) - 
20:06 Gabe: 04:56:547 (3) - This is only a suggestion, I have no objection with the current emplacement. Since you have made a blanket with both of these sliders, 04:55:422 (2,4) - , you could also try to blanket this slider with the beginning of this one: 04:56:172 (2) - 
20:08 Gabe: 05:48:047 (1) - Can you try to make a better blanket here? It's almost perfect ovo
20:11 Gabe: 05:54:297 (2) - this slider seems very far from the previous one. Since the slider one is finishing on a blue tick and the next slider starts directly after it, you should try to make them more closer. It's like these, 05:50:047 (1,2) - , but they're more close than those two.
20:11 Gabe: 05:54:297 (2) - this slider seems very far from the previous one. Since the slider one is finishing on a blue tick and the next slider starts directly after it, you should try to make them more closer. It's like these, 05:50:047 (1,2) - , but they're more close than those two.
20:13 Gabe: 06:06:797 (7) - this one is a bit nazi. Move it to x:376 y:342 to have a consistent spacing with the previous and next circle
20:14 Gabe: 06:53:547 (1,2,3,4,5) - this si just a question, have you snapped them on 1/6? owo
20:19 RLC: hi im back
20:19 Gabe: wb
20:20 RLC: ok, i'll move 04:26:047 (1,1) - 
20:21 RLC: i think i'll move them a lot more too, since right now you can't actually tell that they're moving down when playing
20:22 RLC: 04:56:172 (2,3) - blanket fixed
20:22 RLC: 05:48:047 (1,2) - same
20:23 RLC: 05:53:797 (4,1,2) - i want these to all be the same distance
20:23 RLC: as in
20:23 RLC: their "center"
20:23 RLC: i dunno how to say it

RLC

Elite Mapper

1,007 posts

Joined August 2011

Topic Starter

RLC 2013-05-06T01:05:49+00:00

am i supposed to edit the .osu file for time signature stuff

because right now everything seems to be correct (7/4) in the editor

Sakurai Miyo

3,093 posts

Joined October 2011

Sakurai Miyo 2013-05-06T01:11:01+00:00

look at this failboat

SPOILER

RLC

Elite Mapper

1,007 posts

Joined August 2011

Topic Starter

RLC 2013-05-06T01:14:36+00:00

that's supposed to happen; unfortunately.

lolcubes taught me this method of storyboarding--you have to "kill" the default bg and use it in the SB itself in order to prevent random lines from showing up on the sides

the side effect is that people that disable SB can ignore the BG entirely

i don't really care; whatever helps them play!

ryza

679 posts

Joined October 2011

ryza 2013-05-06T01:16:24+00:00

RLC is a saint

Sakurai Miyo

3,093 posts

Joined October 2011

Sakurai Miyo 2013-05-06T01:17:19+00:00

those jumps kill me

Aurele

Global Moderator

7,606 posts

Joined January 2011

Aurele 2013-05-06T01:20:57+00:00

I guess all of my suggestions were considered, the map was already great how it was.
Nyquill, LunarSakuya, RLC and I looked at what vahn10 pointed out, we found.. nothing?

I finally declare this map... Bubbled!

ermwait.
I meant.. Approved!!

koromo

165 posts

Joined March 2011

koromo 2013-05-06T01:21:19+00:00

Approved woo~

also, inb4 RLC

RLC

Elite Mapper

1,007 posts

Joined August 2011

Topic Starter

RLC 2013-05-06T01:21:22+00:00

#yogo

edit: /me slaps koromo x1000

Sakurai Miyo

3,093 posts

Joined October 2011

Sakurai Miyo 2013-05-06T01:22:07+00:00

yahooo!

ryza

679 posts

Joined October 2011

ryza 2013-05-06T01:22:54+00:00

baka rlc

[Epicz]

215 posts

Joined October 2012

[Epicz] 2013-05-06T01:23:11+00:00

gratz

Satellite

Beatmap Nominator

3,703 posts

Joined June 2012

Satellite 2013-05-06T01:23:48+00:00

congratz~!

mintong89

3,699 posts

Joined July 2011

mintong89 2013-05-06T01:24:30+00:00

wow gratz!

Backfire

3,208 posts

Joined February 2010

Backfire 2013-05-06T01:25:42+00:00

Holy penis

Lally

3,176 posts

Joined December 2011

Lally 2013-05-06T01:26:39+00:00

gratz o.o

Aqo

2,710 posts

Joined April 2010

Aqo 2013-05-06T01:27:00+00:00

rang rang rang rang rang

DSFSDSfds

Grats!

P o M u T a

2,284 posts

Joined December 2010

P o M u T a 2013-05-06T01:29:14+00:00

nice

Zare

1,512 posts

Joined March 2012

Zare 2013-05-06T01:29:42+00:00

So staying up until 3:30 sometimes does have advantages.

Congratz RLC, good job with this

Aurele

Global Moderator

7,606 posts

Joined January 2011

Aurele 2013-05-06T01:32:02+00:00

Zarerion wrote:
So staying up until 3:30 sometimes does have advantages.

Congratz RLC, good job with this

Talking about that.. I NEED TO GO.

BYE RLC AND CONGRATULATION AGAIN c:

Sakurai Miyo

3,093 posts

Joined October 2011

Sakurai Miyo 2013-05-06T01:32:07+00:00

Insta approval again? yay!!!

Low

2,006 posts

Joined July 2011

Low 2013-05-06T01:32:52+00:00

desu

Luna

2,354 posts

Joined November 2010

Luna 2013-05-06T01:36:14+00:00

awsum

charlotteawoo

59 posts

Joined August 2011

charlotteawoo 2013-05-06T01:36:27+00:00

pro map

GoldenWolf

2,983 posts

Joined May 2012

GoldenWolf 2013-05-06T01:54:03+00:00

fooo~

gratz <3

Lolicakey

Lolicakey 2013-05-06T02:01:51+00:00

Oh mah gah ovo...Congratz RLC~!

Nyquill

osu! Alumni

1,781 posts

Joined February 2011

Nyquill 2013-05-06T02:07:03+00:00

I came

Best of 2013 (again)

rui

1,388 posts

Joined February 2009

rui 2013-05-06T02:24:08+00:00

congratz!

RLC

Elite Mapper

1,007 posts

Joined August 2011

Topic Starter

RLC 2013-05-06T02:39:02+00:00

needs user rating 7.77 plz

Rue

489 posts

Joined July 2010

Rue 2013-05-06T02:49:18+00:00

grats mate

-Kirito-

57 posts

Joined November 2011

-Kirito- 2013-05-06T03:06:25+00:00

Lovin' you~
Hold me~

Yocake

213 posts

Joined October 2012

Yocake 2013-05-06T03:31:44+00:00

777<3

Tari

osu! Alumni

1,671 posts

Joined July 2012

Tari 2013-05-06T03:52:46+00:00

Awesome.

Congratulations!

~~btw you should tell me what rlc stands for :<~~

Makyu

424 posts

Joined April 2012

Makyu 2013-05-06T03:59:42+00:00

RLC wrote:

#yogo

edit: /me slaps koromo x1000

#yolo
#swag
#thug life
(?)

TKS

Former osu!taiko Champion: 2014

1,380 posts

Joined July 2011

TKS 2013-05-06T04:13:20+00:00

epic map of 2013

LunarSakuya

osu! Alumni

1,704 posts

Joined August 2011

LunarSakuya 2013-05-06T04:16:44+00:00

HNhnghNGhnGHnhNGhnHGNhGN

winber1

4,519 posts

Joined February 2010

winber1 2013-05-06T04:37:09+00:00

CONGRATULATIONZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ

scanter

2,394 posts

Joined July 2012

scanter 2013-05-06T05:03:22+00:00

Gratz \o/ omgomgomgomgomgomgomgomgomgomgomg !!

69653863

1,818 posts

Joined January 2012

69653863 2013-05-06T05:28:09+00:00

lol

Sieg

3,981 posts

Joined February 2012

Sieg 2013-05-06T05:56:13+00:00

congrats

btw why Genre: Novelty (Instrumental) - I guess this is not instrumental

etc

84 posts

Joined March 2012

etc 2013-05-06T06:10:20+00:00

congratz!

XD L-O-V-E it!

Kanye West

2,222 posts

Joined July 2011

Kanye West 2013-05-06T06:22:17+00:00

Nyquill wrote:
I came

Best of 2013 (again)

Yup, we already have two (three?) maps confirmed for best of 2013 chart.

At this rate, half the maps in the chart will be RLC's.

I am okay with this.

Piotrekol

1,002 posts

Joined March 2010

Piotrekol 2013-05-06T06:27:37+00:00

this ranked omg <3
GJ.

pfrans123

14 posts

Joined June 2012

pfrans123 2013-05-06T07:09:23+00:00

--a this beatmap --a

Fistiro

15 posts

Joined October 2012

Fistiro 2013-05-06T07:38:34+00:00

awesome map
creepy ending

Archangel Tirael

479 posts

Joined January 2011

Archangel Tirael 2013-05-06T07:55:19+00:00

ЛИБОЯПИШУНЕВТОТТРЕДЛИБОВЫНЕЛЮДИТАККАКВЫПИЛИЛИРАСЧЛЕНЁННУЮЛОЛЮ!!!!!!!111 D:
HATEHATEHATEHATEHATE!!!!11

Frostmourne

osu! Alumni

3,737 posts

Joined November 2009

Frostmourne 2013-05-06T09:08:05+00:00

Archangel Tirael wrote:
ЛИБОЯПИШУНЕВТОТТРЕДЛИБОВЫНЕЛЮДИТАККАКВЫПИЛИЛИРАСЧЛЕНЁННУЮЛОЛЮ!!!!!!!111 D:
HATEHATEHATEHATEHATE!!!!11

edit : what does that mean D;

ReySHeL

612 posts

Joined March 2012

ReySHeL 2013-05-06T09:53:18+00:00

gratz

Flask

Beatmap Nominator

3,473 posts

Joined July 2011

Flask 2013-05-06T10:49:54+00:00

hue, cruel rating is cruel ;___;

Gratz RLC <3

Low

2,006 posts

Joined July 2011

Low 2013-05-06T10:57:02+00:00

why is this rated so low?

Kanye West

2,222 posts

Joined July 2011

Kanye West 2013-05-06T11:03:15+00:00

Jacob wrote:
why is this rated so low?

because RLC has reached shiirn status

RLC

Elite Mapper

1,007 posts

Joined August 2011

Topic Starter

RLC 2013-05-06T11:08:57+00:00

Kanye West wrote:
Jacob wrote:
why is this rated so low?
because RLC has reached shiirn status

interesting that you should say this, given that metro and kanna have also recently compared me to shiirn

~~how long is it until i am banned~~

Kanye West

2,222 posts

Joined July 2011

Kanye West 2013-05-06T11:35:04+00:00

I only said it because of Final Answer

Rue

489 posts

Joined July 2010

Rue 2013-05-06T12:41:34+00:00

Frostmourne wrote:
Archangel Tirael wrote:
ЛИБОЯПИШУНЕВТОТТРЕДЛИБОВЫНЕЛЮДИТАККАКВЫПИЛИЛИРАСЧЛЕНЁННУЮЛОЛЮ!!!!!!!111 D:
HATEHATEHATEHATEHATE!!!!11
edit : what does that mean D;

"it's either me posting in a wrong thread or you guys are creeps for removing that dismembered loli"

you're welcome, remove spaces and capslock it yourself

Backfire

3,208 posts

Joined February 2010

Backfire 2013-05-06T13:15:16+00:00

So why is this getting rating trolled? Mad cause bad?

J o J o

278 posts

Joined October 2011

J o J o 2013-05-06T13:36:23+00:00

Nice song , nice map ( in ctb ) Congratz !

-Neipezi

2,266 posts

Joined October 2011

-Neipezi 2013-05-06T14:18:59+00:00

congrats BPM 240 x.x

Mirage

627 posts

Joined May 2011

Mirage 2013-05-06T15:31:48+00:00

wtf rating

Stefan

Global Moderator

10,426 posts

Joined January 2011

Stefan 2013-05-06T15:38:00+00:00

Maddy wrote:
wtf rating

~~Welcome in osu!. Where you're not allowed to map different things without accepting shit ratings.~~

No really, just wait the next days and the ~~troll~~ ~~animu~~ bad Rating will be invisible. Great Job to you all!

D33d

1,699 posts

Joined April 2011

D33d 2013-05-06T16:45:02+00:00

Backfire wrote:
So why is this getting rating trolled? Mad cause bad?

My guess is, "needlessly hard."

Andrea

Beatmap Nominator

16,650 posts

Joined August 2008

Andrea 2013-05-06T16:47:00+00:00

Rating doesn't matter at all guys, keep that in mind.

Stefan

Global Moderator

10,426 posts

Joined January 2011

Stefan 2013-05-06T17:50:04+00:00

Andrea wrote:
Rating doesn't matter at all guys, keep that in mind.

That's actually true but it's like saying "shit map no effort plays gay hurrdurr". Of course the Rating consist subjective thoughts and opinions and of course everyone feels free to rate the Map how he/she/it wants. It's just that many Maps get rated wrongly by wrong criterias and this is the disadvantage of the Star Rating.

OzzyOzrock

5,185 posts

Joined August 2010

OzzyOzrock 2013-05-06T18:25:55+00:00

this song was stuck in my heasd sadfasdfasf

Mirage

627 posts

Joined May 2011

Mirage 2013-05-06T19:02:08+00:00

this map ez i mean wtf 1k combo hr

Nyquill

osu! Alumni

1,781 posts

Joined February 2011

Nyquill 2013-05-06T21:03:12+00:00

holy crap cookiezi strong

RLC

Elite Mapper

1,007 posts

Joined August 2011

Topic Starter

RLC 2013-05-06T21:31:33+00:00

D33d wrote:
Backfire wrote:
So why is this getting rating trolled? Mad cause bad?
My guess is, "needlessly hard."

song sounds pretty crazy to me

why not map crazy

also,

Nyquill wrote:
holy crap cookiezi strong

Archangel Tirael

479 posts

Joined January 2011

Archangel Tirael 2013-05-06T22:14:50+00:00

Backfire wrote:
So why is this getting rating trolled? Mad cause bad?

They as well as I have not seen dissected loli in SB.

D33d

1,699 posts

Joined April 2011

D33d 2013-05-07T00:20:47+00:00

RLC wrote:
D33d wrote:
My guess is, "needlessly hard."
song sounds pretty crazy to me

why not map crazy

A crazy map can still be simplified within reason, or at least have simpler sections. I haven't seen the map, so I won't make any assumptions about the map itself, but intense songs don't excuse bullshit.

RLC

Elite Mapper

1,007 posts

Joined August 2011

Topic Starter

RLC 2013-05-07T00:54:40+00:00

>_> I was actually originally going to make a lengthier post in place of that... seems like it is necessary.

Your statement "needlessly hard," if it is referring to the overall difficulty of the map, makes absolutely no sense whatsoever. It implies that the map is somehow "too hard for the song," which is a stupid concept, since you can't just listen to a song and say, "oh, the map for it must be around this difficulty with this SV, blah blah." That's a load of nonsense. On the other hand,

D33d wrote:
A crazy map can still be simplified within reason, or at least have simpler sections.

Yes! This is a more logical statement. I assure you, the relative internal difficulties of this map have been very meticulously thought out--relative SV, object density, smoothness of flow, etc.

Trust me, if I wanted to make a "needlessly hard" beatmap, I would put spam random circle jumps for the entire seven minutes of the song.

And as for your statement,

D33d wrote:
...intense songs don't excuse bullshit.

"bullshit"? I suggest you don't carry this assuming attitude of knowing what is holy and what is unholy in mapping. Please don't assume that you've got mapping all figured out. It does no one any good.

ryza

679 posts

Joined October 2011

ryza 2013-05-07T06:39:42+00:00

D33d wrote:
...but intense songs don't excuse bullshit.

Intense songs are the best for making hard maps like these, because it's where the crazy maps fit.

"Bullshit" to you may be "really fun" to someone else, it's all a matter of perspective.

Please keep in mind that easy maps are abundant in osu! and very difficult maps are not so common.

GamerX4life

589 posts

Joined January 2010

GamerX4life 2013-05-07T08:28:20+00:00

yeaaah congratz RLC!

Snepif

1,143 posts

Joined July 2010

Snepif 2013-05-07T23:17:39+00:00

D33d wrote:
A crazy map can still be simplified within reason, or at least have simpler sections. I haven't seen the map, so I won't make any assumptions about the map itself, but intense songs don't excuse bullshit.

Lol this deed dude... i don't agree at all. The map is awesome, you just don't even play, how would you know............

Laharl

1,396 posts

Joined January 2011

Laharl 2013-05-07T23:40:14+00:00

Congrats, great song.

djjsixpack

162 posts

Joined September 2011

djjsixpack 2013-05-08T01:57:12+00:00

D33d wrote:
A crazy map can still be simplified within reason, or at least have simpler sections. I haven't seen the map, so I won't make any assumptions about the map itself, but intense songs don't excuse bullshit.

It's not harder than a 240 BPM map should be.

Cyclohexane

osu! Alumni

4,568 posts

Joined May 2009

Cyclohexane 2013-05-08T02:59:57+00:00

Intense difficulty doesn't mean bad ratings (hi FREEDOM DiVE, hi Airman, hi pretty much every approval map out there).

There's stuff people like and stuff they don't.

You guys are discussing a rating made off 41 votes. Not the most representative of the hundred thousands of players this game has.

Yuzeyun

7,650 posts

Joined September 2010

Yuzeyun 2013-05-08T08:41:00+00:00

Mr Color wrote:
Intense difficulty doesn't mean bad ratings (hi FREEDOM DiVE, hi Airman, hi pretty much every approval map out there).

There's stuff people like and stuff they don't.

You guys are discussing a rating made off 41 votes. Not the most representative of the hundred thousands of players this game has.

Don't forget that such ratings happens at the very first minutes after ranking/approval.
I'll bet 10 bucks this will end with 9+.

Soarezi

Soarezi 2013-05-08T10:44:25+00:00

I absolutely love this map, the only part i dislike is the slider part at like 70% of the map, other than that good job RLC!

Frobe

Former osu!catch Champion: 2015

743 posts

Joined January 2011

Frobe 2013-05-09T14:44:34+00:00

Why the low Rating?

Snepif

1,143 posts

Joined July 2010

Snepif 2013-05-10T01:35:30+00:00

Frobe wrote:
Why the low Rating?

because osu sucks ass
people like really poorly and retardedly mapped stuff (i.e. 90% of ranked/bubbled maps nowadays) or more

t+pazolite feat. Rizna - Distorted Lovesong [Osu|Taiko]

Sign In To Proceed

Don't have an account?

t+pazolite feat. Rizna - Distorted Lovesong [Osu|Taiko]

Jacob wrote:

Jacob wrote:

tetsutaro wrote:

Jacob wrote:

Makar wrote:

RLC wrote:

Lybydose wrote:

Gabe wrote:

RLC wrote:

Zarerion wrote:

RLC wrote:

Nyquill wrote:

Archangel Tirael wrote:

Jacob wrote:

Kanye West wrote:

Jacob wrote:

Frostmourne wrote:

Archangel Tirael wrote:

Maddy wrote:

Backfire wrote:

Andrea wrote:

D33d wrote:

Backfire wrote:

Nyquill wrote:

Backfire wrote:

RLC wrote:

D33d wrote:

D33d wrote:

D33d wrote:

D33d wrote:

D33d wrote:

D33d wrote:

Mr Color wrote:

Frobe wrote:

New reply