You messed up the votes for SFGEcho wrote:
votes fixed Not yet, 0_o unvoted a while ago.
You messed up the votes for SFGEcho wrote:
votes fixed Not yet, 0_o unvoted a while ago.
Or they have different timezones.rust45 wrote:
You know, I think I'm starting to suspect, Wojjan, kuu, and adam, they haven't discussed recently, maybe they're trying to make sure they don't slip something up, but even if it's possible, one of them can't be Mafia.
Or they are busy IRL.rust45 wrote:
Unvote
Vote: Pasonia Now that I think about, why would the mafia care who gets lynched in the first day? Unless of course they suspect someone of being a cop or doctor.
...Wojjan wrote:
Strager
What is "HOS" ? Also, how did I take the argument too far?Wojjan wrote:
HOS: strager for taking the argument too far, right after the "hey SFG lets trade votes lol" phase.
The Game Setup wrote:
In addition, in keeping with the story, the mafia members will not know who the other person is.
So distancing is a non-issue this game; they don't know who the other is and they are against eachotherThe Mafia PM wrote:
Win Condition: You win when you are the only Mafia left in the game and you represent at least half of all living players.
Hand of Suspicion (FOS*5) :Ostrager wrote:
What is "HOS" ?
When was I sincere? Actually, I would like a full reason as to why you suspect me, I started posting differently because I started to take this more seriously then I was before, but I still don't know when I was being sincere.Wojjan wrote:
Your writing style suddenly changed, and you were all around more insincere.
Wojjan wrote:
Seriously, the only reason to keep the argument up for so long is to make clear (or to fail in making clear) that you have no connection whatsoever. I won't say you are the only ones that are suspicious, but I'd have to use too many FOSes to point out everyone
gimme a break, i wake up and go tackle all night posts one by one in the order they appear and merge later.Wojjan wrote:
thank you for pointing that out after 0_o has pointed that out
Now what would be your reason for voting for me when no one else had voted for me after I defending myself. (Except for SFG but she voted for me before I defened my self) I keeping my vote one you for this reason.Pasonia wrote:
Ouch.
Unvote vote rust45.
P.S.: Jeez.
This is because you also voted me without due reason. I have kept my activity minimal just to see what happens, and I am less than happy when I get voted without a due reason attached.rust45 wrote:
Now what would be your reason for voting for me when no one else had voted for me after I defending myself. (Except for SFG but she voted for me before I defened my self) I keeping my vote one you for this reason.Pasonia wrote:
Ouch.
Unvote vote rust45.
P.S.: Jeez.
Pasonia wrote:
I have kept my activity minimal just to see what happens
First post has some whimsical reasoning behind it. I think Echo would at least leave us with a Cop. It would probably even things out for the Town and Mafias, I think.0_o wrote:
I also want to point something out about strager though..strager wrote:
So what's everyone's guess on the roles?
I'm thinking like M2: Two Mafia, one Cop, 6 Vanilla Townies.Why is strager bringing up the cop so much? Is he trying to make us believe he is the cop? This is confusing me because he knows how well bringing up the doctor went in M2... so FOS stragerstrager wrote:
Mod: Can a Cop investigate a dead person?
Could you explain a situation where LyLo is possible?Saturos-fangirl wrote:
mod: will LyLo be announced considering that we aren't allowed to know the ID's of the people who died, and telling us will show us how many mafia are dead?
Actually:strager wrote:
First post has some whimsical reasoning behind it. I think Echo would at least leave us with a Cop. It would probably even things out for the Town and Mafias, I think.
So Echo had no say in what setup was used.The Game Setup wrote:
This game will be using a randomly selected setup based on the C9 setup.
Fair enough. I didn't really find this post suspicious as much as the fact that you brought up the Cop so much (nice Echo, now you got me paranoid about that stuffstrager wrote:
Second post was to figure out if investigations could performed on a dead person. Simple as that. I know only a Cop would really want to know, but it could help us later because only a Cop would know the alignment of anyone, but cannot if they were lynched D1. So you can check a Cop's claims against what is possible.
Could you explain a situation where LyLo is possible?I think this game is weird that way, even in a situation where there are 2 mafia and 3 townies, the game would not be at LyLo because the mafia can't win without killing the other. So I think the only possible LyLo situation is 1 mafia, 2 (or 3) humans.
Oh, right. Well just a guess, then. xD0_o wrote:
Actually:strager wrote:
First post has some whimsical reasoning behind it. I think Echo would at least leave us with a Cop. It would probably even things out for the Town and Mafias, I think.So Echo had no say in what setup was used.The Game Setup wrote:
This game will be using a randomly selected setup based on the C9 setup.
Oh, I see. What about two Mafias and one Townie? Lynch goes to one of the Mafias and the kill goes for the Townie. Or, the Lynch goes to the Townie and it's a draw between the two Mafia, and the Town loses.0_o wrote:
So I think the only possible LyLo situation is 1 mafia, 2 (or 3) humans.
LadySuburu wrote:
Questions:
Did anyone but strager himself actually read my strager case? I'm just curious, as nobody commented on it, and there's little discussion going on now.
If we had to lynch someone due to deadline, who should it be, assuming no additional meaningful discussion happens between now and then?
This is only possible if the Mafia doesn't know each other, which, sadly, is this way in this game.strager wrote:
Oh, I see. What about two Mafias and one Townie? Lynch goes to one of the Mafias and the kill goes for the Townie. Or, the Lynch goes to the Townie and it's a draw between the two Mafia, and the Town loses.
ERRRRG I know it's total WIFOM but why is this making me think SFG isn't mafiaSaturos-fangirl wrote:
welp, i guess im getting lynched for scumhunting. w/e just make sure you find the scum, okay? ill see you guys again at endgame, hopefully with a town win rather than a mafia win.
pleasepleasepleasepleasePLEASE be smarter in this game than you were in M1, M2, and M3
If we're still in the RVS stage, we're doing something wrong.Wojjan wrote:
Wow, where did those posts come from?
Putting someone on L-1 is silly and dumb, especially in a somewhat RVS
- rust +1.5
LadySuburu wrote:
If we're still in the RVS stage, we're doing something wrong.
*Wojjan facepamlmsWojjan wrote:
Putting someone on L-1 is silly and dumb, especially in a somewhat RVS
Yet, if you put someone on L-1 it raises some suspicion. Why would he not give strager a chance of speaking? Why would he make way for a Hammer to instantly get him? Doesn't it seem weird? Especially since we got a lot to discuss, seeing the number of posts a moment.LadySuburu wrote:
Also: There's no need to wait until deadline every single day in mafia games. If five people suspect that someone is mafia, we lynch them. Of course, you want to give them a chance to post and or claim before you do.
Wojjan. have you read very many of my posts?Wojjan wrote:
Subi, and actually all of stragers bandwagon, I'd like you to think twice if your vote isn't really based on anything. We're on 5 to lynch today, so if we kill a townie today, and the mafia does so too, we only need three votes for a mafia to hop in and get a kill tomorrow. If they've coordiated at night, and decided to both get a vote on one, two votes can bring us in danger.
Also, my suspicion of rust went up by a notch for never saying why he voted strager before, and even now not clearly stating what of stragers behavior could be scummyrust45 is now on 2.5 suspicion rate in my eyes, and the highest on my list. He hence gets my vote.
- rust45: +1
vote: rust45
Random Vote Stagestrager wrote:
Q's:
What's RVS?
What's Hammering?
ahh i KNEW i was forgetting someone...strager wrote:
SFG, What are your opinions on 0_o?
Main reasons for voting: If you trace through some of our conversations, you'll find there are other posts that have my reasons included as well. Example: My post on Page 10, and the resulting conversation from that.strager wrote:
LadySuburu, your main reasons for voting for me are outlined in the following posts:
viewtopic.php?p=152992#p152992
viewtopic.php?p=153782#p153782
Of me acting like kuu, I would appreciate specific examples. Even with supporting posts I doubt that's reason enough to vote for someone.
In the second post above, you show that rust45, SFG, and I (and to a lesser extend 0_o) are all pretty suspicious by our jumping on bandwagons. With the recent L-1 vote against me by rust45 (which you say looks pretty random) has your level of suspicion not changed? rust45 now has made two L-1 votes, whereas I have not made any. You explicitly mention that putting L-1 without reason is scummy: viewtopic.php?p=153787#p153787
The exact same reasoning could be applied to rust45 and SFG for tie-ing votes as well. I think rust45 even started the tie-ing thing (unsure).LadySuburu wrote:
Main reasons for voting: If you trace through some of our conversations, you'll find there are other posts that have my reasons included as well. Example: My post on Page 10, and the resulting conversation from that.
If you're referring to my acting in M2, of course I'm acting differently. I'm in a different situation. I don't have a false role claim on my head, I'm not being heavily attacked by one or more highly skilled players very well, and I'm not a newbie. Again, I would like specific examples else your claim is worthless in my eyes.LadySuburu wrote:
Acting like kuu: You weren't acting as I know you to act, which is apperently less than I thought. You were acting much different than how you are now acting in defense.
1: I'll check to see who for sure started the near-lynch trend. I'll also see how involved you were in it.strager wrote:
The exact same reasoning could be applied to rust45 and SFG for tie-ing votes as well. I think rust45 even started the tie-ing thing (unsure).LadySuburu wrote:
Main reasons for voting: If you trace through some of our conversations, you'll find there are other posts that have my reasons included as well. Example: My post on Page 10, and the resulting conversation from that.
"setting a trend to get many people near lynch" -- I didn't really set the trend I think. I did start the "vote for yourself as a joke" thing which SFG followed.If you're referring to my acting in M2, of course I'm acting differently. I'm in a different situation. I don't have a false role claim on my head, I'm not being heavily attacked by one or more highly skilled players very well, and I'm not a newbie. Again, I would like specific examples else your claim is worthless in my eyes.LadySuburu wrote:
Acting like kuu: You weren't acting as I know you to act, which is apperently less than I thought. You were acting much different than how you are now acting in defense.
Well for one I don't think it was that wild, I already said you and SFG were high on my list, and I recently started to have doubts about SFG's guilt.strager wrote:
That vote on me was pretty wild. Can you explain your exact reasoning?
Finally someone realizes this truth. This is the first game of Mafia I've ever played. Due to this I'm still not playing very well. I'm still trying to get the hang of this. And yes, I know I should've joined a newbie mafia game first.Saturos-fangirl wrote:
rust is obviously a noob, he may be mafia or may not be mafia, but he's acting a bit like strager did in M2, minus the roleclaim
Thing is, they are just as likely to be a mafia trying to hide. If they were gathering information for the next day, wouldn't they be asking questions and stimulating discussions as opposed to hiding in a corner the whole time?adam2046 wrote:
I have nothing I feel like commenting on at this point in time.
Just posting so people know I'm actually reading.
Oh and instead of killing off people who don't talk straight away (which I think is a tactic that the mafia would consider using) you should encourage them to speak first, give them a day and if they still refuse to speak actively, kill them off. Lynching people who act like this first day might be a mistake because they could just be gathering information to use the next day (or they could be an aux role trying to hide.)
Because it's easy to do, just like you're doing.0_o wrote:
Also I don't really see why mafia would want to get rid of quiet people, I would think they would want to have people no one knows anything about in the final days to cause confusion. (it worked the last 3 games...)
"kill anyone here on purpose"? What? Firstly if I was really desperate to get rid of anyone I probably wouldn't have switched off of you after I got you on L-1 (inadvertently mind you, I didn't think rust would swoop in right after me).strager wrote:
I'll have to go with adam on this issue. It seems 0_o is trying to kill anyone here on purpose, as if he's not really part of the Town. At least that's what I see of him.
Well actually, the easy thing for mafia to do would be to keep their trap shut and let the town lynch anyone who isn't them. I, on the other hand, do care about who is lynched, and think we should get rid of the dead weight that's gonna kill us at the end.adam2046 wrote:
Because it's easy to do, just like you're doing.0_o wrote:
Also I don't really see why mafia would want to get rid of quiet people, I would think they would want to have people no one knows anything about in the final days to cause confusion. (it worked the last 3 games...)
I had forgotten roles are not revealed. Down the road there'd probably be at least one Mafia on each lynch against anyone here, though, so hopping off the bandwagon against would be to avoid this. Of course, this is a WIFOM situation.0_o wrote:
"kill anyone here on purpose"? What? Firstly if I was really desperate to get rid of anyone I probably wouldn't have switched off of you after I got you on L-1 (inadvertently mind you, I didn't think rust would swoop in right after me).strager wrote:
I'll have to go with adam on this issue. It seems 0_o is trying to kill anyone here on purpose, as if he's not really part of the Town. At least that's what I see of him.
Hehe... that explains why you're reluctant to vote SFGLadySuburu wrote:
There are rare cases that a townie hammers without waiting for some discussion, but those are rare.
I lol'dBagelBob wrote:
I've read through the game once and to be Frank, you all look guilty.
strager, you're going to get lynched, even claiming vanilla would help since roles aren't revealed upon deathdeadline wrote:
vote: strager