This map has been deleted on the request of its creator. It is no longer available.
forum
Mafia 4 [Game over!]
posted
Total Posts
398
This map has been deleted on the request of its creator. It is no longer available.
Some bandwagonning analysis:
0_o: 3, 2, 3
adam: 2, 2, 2
LS: 3
Pasonia: -
rust45: 4, 3, 3, 3
SFG: 4, 3, 4
strager: 2, 2, 2, 3, 2, 3, 3, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2
Wojjan: 3, 2, 2
Bandwagonner on the left, number of votes after bandwagon on the right. Vote counts are ordered chronologically.
SFG and rust45 seem pretty high-risk.
0_o: 3, 2, 3
adam: 2, 2, 2
LS: 3
Pasonia: -
rust45: 4, 3, 3, 3
SFG: 4, 3, 4
strager: 2, 2, 2, 3, 2, 3, 3, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2
Wojjan: 3, 2, 2
Bandwagonner on the left, number of votes after bandwagon on the right. Vote counts are ordered chronologically.
SFG and rust45 seem pretty high-risk.
This map has been deleted on the request of its creator. It is no longer available.
LadySuburu wrote:
SFG: Do you think any instance of tying votes is scummy, or only a repeated action?
rust45's consistant use of tying the votes is what made me suspicious, especially after the vote-tying game had ended and he seemed to have adopted it for rational use.
so i guess my problem with rust's vote-tying is that he seemed to be doing it seriously rather than for fun, as judged by the tone of his posts.
ok let me give you the reasoning behind the L-1 bandwagoning.strager wrote:
SFG and rust45 seem pretty high-risk.
anyone who lays a fifth vote on that person is scum.
there are two scum and five nonscum.
therefore if we lose one nonscum and kill a scum in the process, things are good. if not, we dont lose the nonscum cus no one jumped on the bandwagon.
i am, of course, assuming we dont have any ASH's in here, based on the player lineup.
If someone else had been the last to post a tie-ing vote, would you be somewhat suspicious of them?Saturos-fangirl wrote:
rust45's consistant use of tying the votes is what made me suspicious, especially after the vote-tying game had ended and he seemed to have adopted it for rational use.
This post makes it sound like fun: viewtopic.php?p=152646#p152646Saturos-fangirl wrote:
so i guess my problem with rust's vote-tying is that he seemed to be doing it seriously rather than for fun, as judged by the tone of his posts.
This one as well: viewtopic.php?p=153080#p153080
Others not as much, but still.
I do have to agree that behind these posts are possibly dangerous consequences.
WIFOM?Saturos-fangirl wrote:
ok let me give you the reasoning behind the L-1 bandwagoning.strager wrote:
SFG and rust45 seem pretty high-risk.
anyone who lays a fifth vote on that person is scum.
there are two scum and five nonscum.
therefore if we lose one nonscum and kill a scum in the process, things are good. if not, we dont lose the nonscum cus no one jumped on the bandwagon.
i am, of course, assuming we dont have any ASH's in here, based on the player lineup.
The last person to vote should have to be well convinced, otherwise it's blatant accidental posting or blatant Mafia claiming. Based on how convinced he is you could vote to lynch him. Of course, if you were one of the people to vote for the one who was lynched, you would be suspicious too (albeit not as suspicious as the last voter).
So... Basically, voting patterns aren't the determining factor for Mafia, which is what you're implying. Pointing that out makes it seem you want someone other than you lynched. Hmm...
This map has been deleted on the request of its creator. It is no longer available.
LadySuburu wrote:
Everyone: Who do you think is mafia right now? Are you satisfied with your current vote?
i suspect rust45 and strager of being mafia, but i really want to know more about kuwarudo and everyone else before anything major happens. i cant remember seeing much of adam, you and 0_o seem kinda meh....im missing two players oh PASONIA. Pas needs to post more...who was the other player?
alright point taken im not as involved in this game as i should be. *sigh* i promise ill make a suspicion list with reasons a la WW3-R once i get unswamped with modding ok?
Yup.LadySuburu wrote:
1: Changing votes a lot (wishy-washy voting) is a known scum-tell. You've got a pretty high rating for this
This one? viewtopic.php?p=151854#p151854LadySuburu wrote:
expecially looking at your first bandwagoning post.
Yup.LadySuburu wrote:
Another known scum indicator is being third or fourth on a bandwagon. You, rust and SFG seem high up there.
You just said so yourself.LadySuburu wrote:
2: Do you personally think placing a player on L-1 is a scummy thing to do if you don't have a reason?
If it's all random votes, I have my eye on it closely in case something happens. Otherwise L-2 isn't too much of an issue.LadySuburu wrote:
How dangerous do you see L-2?
This map has been deleted on the request of its creator. It is no longer available.
I should've phrased this better. Based on your bandwagoning chart. I was counting my edit of your chart as still yours.LadySuburu wrote:
expecially looking at your first bandwagoning post.
I said it is. That doesn't mean you see it as such. Key word: personallyLadySuburu wrote:
2: Do you personally think placing a player on L-1 is a scummy thing to do if you don't have a reason?
As for the rest: Mmk.
Edit while previewing:
rust45: You wouldn't screw the game up by getting a "No Lynch", but you would make it harder on the town.
True, that's why I changed my mind.LadySuburu wrote:
rust45: You wouldn't screw the game up by getting a "No Lynch", but you would make it harder on the town.
By saying "You just said so yourself." I was agreeing with you.LadySuburu wrote:
I said it is. That doesn't mean you see it as such. Key word: personallyLadySuburu wrote:
2: Do you personally think placing a player on L-1 is a scummy thing to do if you don't have a reason?
Topic Starter
Vote Count
strager (2) - adam, LadySuburu
kuwarudo (2) - Wojjan, 0_o
SFG (2) - kuwarudo, strager
0_o (1) - Pasonia
rust45 (1) - SFG
Not voting: rust45
strager (2) - adam, LadySuburu
kuwarudo (2) - Wojjan, 0_o
SFG (2) - kuwarudo, strager
0_o (1) - Pasonia
rust45 (1) - SFG
Not voting: rust45
You messed up the votes for SFGEcho wrote:
votes fixed Not yet, 0_o unvoted a while ago.
This map has been deleted on the request of its creator. It is no longer available.
You know, I think I'm starting to suspect, Wojjan, kuu, and adam, they haven't discussed recently, maybe they're trying to make sure they don't slip something up, but even if it's possible, one of them can't be Mafia.
Or they have different timezones.rust45 wrote:
You know, I think I'm starting to suspect, Wojjan, kuu, and adam, they haven't discussed recently, maybe they're trying to make sure they don't slip something up, but even if it's possible, one of them can't be Mafia.
This map has been deleted on the request of its creator. It is no longer available.
This map has been deleted on the request of its creator. It is no longer available.
I think Echo's latest vote count is wrong. 0_o unvoted here: viewtopic.php?p=153244#p153244
It'd be cool if your vote was bold and the first thing on the line so it's more noticable.
It'd be cool if your vote was bold and the first thing on the line so it's more noticable.
This map has been deleted on the request of its creator. It is no longer available.
I'm not you, remember?
Yeah, I think adam is stable.
Unvote
Vote: Pasonia Now that I think about, why would the mafia care who gets lynched in the first day? Unless of course they suspect someone of being a cop or doctor.
Vote: Pasonia Now that I think about, why would the mafia care who gets lynched in the first day? Unless of course they suspect someone of being a cop or doctor.
Or they are busy IRL.rust45 wrote:
Unvote
Vote: Pasonia Now that I think about, why would the mafia care who gets lynched in the first day? Unless of course they suspect someone of being a cop or doctor.
Well, if they come and post, and defend well, maybe I'll retract my vote.
Topic Starter
Vote Count
SFG (2) - kuwarudo, strager
Pasonia (2) - adam, rust45
strager (1) - LadySuburu
kuwarudo (1) - Wojjan
0_o (1) - Pasonia
rust45 (1) - SFG
Not voting: 0_o
Should be correct now.
SFG (2) - kuwarudo, strager
Pasonia (2) - adam, rust45
strager (1) - LadySuburu
kuwarudo (1) - Wojjan
0_o (1) - Pasonia
rust45 (1) - SFG
Not voting: 0_o
Should be correct now.
Yay I'm back
I've read through the majority, and the main thing that caught my eye is the
Strager and SFG distancing power hour
Seriously, the only reason to keep the argument up for so long is to make clear (or to fail in making clear) that you have no connection whatsoever. I won't say you are the only ones that are suspicious, but I'd have to use too many FOSes to point out everyone
vote: SFG for taking one little thing into enormous proportions. He was JOKING, all his posts are in such a formal and tactful matter.
HOS: strager for taking the argument too far, right after the "hey SFG lets trade votes lol" phase.
FOS: rust45 for acting a little weird once accused of being Mafia. Your writing style suddenly changed, and you were all around more insincere.
That's the top three on my list. I know a top 3 doesn't make sense with 2 scummies, but that way if one of my XOSes turns out townie, I still have a lead to go on
I've read through the majority, and the main thing that caught my eye is the
Strager and SFG distancing power hour
Seriously, the only reason to keep the argument up for so long is to make clear (or to fail in making clear) that you have no connection whatsoever. I won't say you are the only ones that are suspicious, but I'd have to use too many FOSes to point out everyone
vote: SFG for taking one little thing into enormous proportions. He was JOKING, all his posts are in such a formal and tactful matter.
HOS: strager for taking the argument too far, right after the "hey SFG lets trade votes lol" phase.
FOS: rust45 for acting a little weird once accused of being Mafia. Your writing style suddenly changed, and you were all around more insincere.
That's the top three on my list. I know a top 3 doesn't make sense with 2 scummies, but that way if one of my XOSes turns out townie, I still have a lead to go on
...Wojjan wrote:
Strager
What is "HOS" ? Also, how did I take the argument too far?Wojjan wrote:
HOS: strager for taking the argument too far, right after the "hey SFG lets trade votes lol" phase.
You forgot something..
EDIT:
also inb4 lame remark on knowing the mafia PM -_-
The Game Setup wrote:
In addition, in keeping with the story, the mafia members will not know who the other person is.
So distancing is a non-issue this game; they don't know who the other is and they are against eachotherThe Mafia PM wrote:
Win Condition: You win when you are the only Mafia left in the game and you represent at least half of all living players.
EDIT:
Hand of Suspicion (FOS*5) :Ostrager wrote:
What is "HOS" ?
also inb4 lame remark on knowing the mafia PM -_-
I completely forgot about that new rule. So far for all the Mafia strategy I know :(
When was I sincere? Actually, I would like a full reason as to why you suspect me, I started posting differently because I started to take this more seriously then I was before, but I still don't know when I was being sincere.Wojjan wrote:
Your writing style suddenly changed, and you were all around more insincere.
Maybe sincere isn't exactly the right word. In your previous post you spoke in a more... business-like way. When you were accused, you changed from formal to somewhat uncanny. It's only an FOS, don't worry about it ;P
Wojjan wrote:
Seriously, the only reason to keep the argument up for so long is to make clear (or to fail in making clear) that you have no connection whatsoever. I won't say you are the only ones that are suspicious, but I'd have to use too many FOSes to point out everyone
that would make perfect sense except for the fact that the mafia have no idea who each other are.
Edit: oh i see someone already pointed that out...thnx 0_o... *disappears into the abyss of L-2*
thank you for pointing that out after 0_o has pointed that out
gimme a break, i wake up and go tackle all night posts one by one in the order they appear and merge later.Wojjan wrote:
thank you for pointing that out after 0_o has pointed that out
Questions:
Did anyone but strager himself actually read my strager case? I'm just curious, as nobody commented on it, and there's little discussion going on now.
If we had to lynch someone due to deadline, who should it be, assuming no additional meaningful discussion happens between now and then?
Mod: Prod anyone who hasn't posted within prod hours please.
Did anyone but strager himself actually read my strager case? I'm just curious, as nobody commented on it, and there's little discussion going on now.
If we had to lynch someone due to deadline, who should it be, assuming no additional meaningful discussion happens between now and then?
Mod: Prod anyone who hasn't posted within prod hours please.
I'm not gonna vote today, since this RVS is going rather out of hand. I won't be around for a while either tomorrow, so please keep that in mind. Well, my posting will all depend on the situation. I'm moving, you know.
This map has been deleted on the request of its creator. It is no longer available.
Topic Starter
This map has been deleted on the request of its creator. It is no longer available.
Ouch.
Unvote vote rust45.
P.S.: Jeez.
Unvote vote rust45.
P.S.: Jeez.
...
I hate you so much Pas.
I hate you so much Pas.
I'm still fucking here, I'm still here. I just get frequently cut-off.
Now what would be your reason for voting for me when no one else had voted for me after I defending myself. (Except for SFG but she voted for me before I defened my self) I keeping my vote one you for this reason.Pasonia wrote:
Ouch.
Unvote vote rust45.
P.S.: Jeez.
This is because you also voted me without due reason. I have kept my activity minimal just to see what happens, and I am less than happy when I get voted without a due reason attached.rust45 wrote:
Now what would be your reason for voting for me when no one else had voted for me after I defending myself. (Except for SFG but she voted for me before I defened my self) I keeping my vote one you for this reason.Pasonia wrote:
Ouch.
Unvote vote rust45.
P.S.: Jeez.
This map has been deleted on the request of its creator. It is no longer available.
Pasonia wrote:
I have kept my activity minimal just to see what happens
im not sure whether thats brilliant or stupid, since the people who talk are the ones who get lynched (i mean hey lookit me i talk a lot and im L-2 -_- for like the third time), but it also puts us in a really bad situation on Day 3 (assuming no mafia killed)
wait i just thought of something
mod: will LyLo be announced considering that we aren't allowed to know the ID's of the people who died, and telling us will show us how many mafia are dead?
...back to @Personia, not speaking seems to be working as a self-preservation tactic that helps you as a person but harms the town. Therefore i would say that unless you are mafia, this is not a good tactic to use.
shut up about WIFOM, im trying to persuade him rather than convict him.
Woot! Less garbage here than in BM1!
Second post was to figure out if investigations could performed on a dead person. Simple as that. I know only a Cop would really want to know, but it could help us later because only a Cop would know the alignment of anyone, but cannot if they were lynched D1. So you can check a Cop's claims against what is possible.
First post has some whimsical reasoning behind it. I think Echo would at least leave us with a Cop. It would probably even things out for the Town and Mafias, I think.0_o wrote:
I also want to point something out about strager though..strager wrote:
So what's everyone's guess on the roles?
I'm thinking like M2: Two Mafia, one Cop, 6 Vanilla Townies.Why is strager bringing up the cop so much? Is he trying to make us believe he is the cop? This is confusing me because he knows how well bringing up the doctor went in M2... so FOS stragerstrager wrote:
Mod: Can a Cop investigate a dead person?
Second post was to figure out if investigations could performed on a dead person. Simple as that. I know only a Cop would really want to know, but it could help us later because only a Cop would know the alignment of anyone, but cannot if they were lynched D1. So you can check a Cop's claims against what is possible.
Could you explain a situation where LyLo is possible?Saturos-fangirl wrote:
mod: will LyLo be announced considering that we aren't allowed to know the ID's of the people who died, and telling us will show us how many mafia are dead?
Actually:strager wrote:
First post has some whimsical reasoning behind it. I think Echo would at least leave us with a Cop. It would probably even things out for the Town and Mafias, I think.
So Echo had no say in what setup was used.The Game Setup wrote:
This game will be using a randomly selected setup based on the C9 setup.
Fair enough. I didn't really find this post suspicious as much as the fact that you brought up the Cop so much (nice Echo, now you got me paranoid about that stuffstrager wrote:
Second post was to figure out if investigations could performed on a dead person. Simple as that. I know only a Cop would really want to know, but it could help us later because only a Cop would know the alignment of anyone, but cannot if they were lynched D1. So you can check a Cop's claims against what is possible.
)Could you explain a situation where LyLo is possible?I think this game is weird that way, even in a situation where there are 2 mafia and 3 townies, the game would not be at LyLo because the mafia can't win without killing the other. So I think the only possible LyLo situation is 1 mafia, 2 (or 3) humans.
Oh, right. Well just a guess, then. xD0_o wrote:
Actually:strager wrote:
First post has some whimsical reasoning behind it. I think Echo would at least leave us with a Cop. It would probably even things out for the Town and Mafias, I think.So Echo had no say in what setup was used.The Game Setup wrote:
This game will be using a randomly selected setup based on the C9 setup.
Oh, I see. What about two Mafias and one Townie? Lynch goes to one of the Mafias and the kill goes for the Townie. Or, the Lynch goes to the Townie and it's a draw between the two Mafia, and the Town loses.0_o wrote:
So I think the only possible LyLo situation is 1 mafia, 2 (or 3) humans.
Two Mafias and two Townies: Lynch Mafia is other Mafia win. Lynch Townie is Mafia tie as well.
Two Mafias, one Vanilla Townie, one Doctor: Lynch Mafia, and Townie is protected, results in LyLo (again). Lynch either Townie and Mafia tie.
Perhaps some other situations I'm missing.
By "Mafia tie" this assumes one Mafia doesn't give up the game for the other.
Topic Starter
Vote Count
SFG (3) - kuwarudo, strager, 0_o
Pasonia (2) - adam, rust45
rust45 (2) - SFG, Pasonia
strager (1) - LadySuburu
Not voting: Wojjan
Day 1 ends in 29 hours!
-- SFG is at L-2!
LyLo will not be announced.
SFG (3) - kuwarudo, strager, 0_o
Pasonia (2) - adam, rust45
rust45 (2) - SFG, Pasonia
strager (1) - LadySuburu
Not voting: Wojjan
Day 1 ends in 29 hours!
-- SFG is at L-2!
LyLo will not be announced.
Am I invisible? *waves hand in front of face* No? I can see myself.
So, I think you all can see me too. Or at least my posts. So I'd like everyone who my last post was directed to, to actually directly answer my questions. That way, I don't think you're hiding some reason for not answering it. (Or, alternatively, So I don't start lurking because you just ignore me anyway.)
Day ends in 29 hours. If we're deciding on lynching someone, let's DECIDE on lynching them. I'm not saying we have to lynch before deadline, but we should know full well who and why we're lynching whomever we are.
So, I think you all can see me too. Or at least my posts. So I'd like everyone who my last post was directed to, to actually directly answer my questions. That way, I don't think you're hiding some reason for not answering it. (Or, alternatively, So I don't start lurking because you just ignore me anyway.)
Day ends in 29 hours. If we're deciding on lynching someone, let's DECIDE on lynching them. I'm not saying we have to lynch before deadline, but we should know full well who and why we're lynching whomever we are.
Ok, if Pasonia doesn't start talking day 2, I'm gonna go back to voting him.
INCASE YOU CAN'T READ SUCH SMALL TEXT, THAT MEANS YOU PASONIA.
Unvote
Back to voting strager for his out of the ordinary behaviour.
Vote: strager
INCASE YOU CAN'T READ SUCH SMALL TEXT, THAT MEANS YOU PASONIA.
Unvote
Back to voting strager for his out of the ordinary behaviour.
Vote: strager
LadySuburu wrote:
Questions:
Did anyone but strager himself actually read my strager case? I'm just curious, as nobody commented on it, and there's little discussion going on now.
If we had to lynch someone due to deadline, who should it be, assuming no additional meaningful discussion happens between now and then?
i probably read the whole thing but i forgot what it said. it probably still made some sort of impression on me
if we have to lynch due to deadline it should be one of the mafia -_- but my guess is as good as yours as to who that might be
kuwarudo needs to be replaced
Pasonia needs to make more posts
This is only possible if the Mafia doesn't know each other, which, sadly, is this way in this game.strager wrote:
Oh, I see. What about two Mafias and one Townie? Lynch goes to one of the Mafias and the kill goes for the Townie. Or, the Lynch goes to the Townie and it's a draw between the two Mafia, and the Town loses.
Also, Pasonia is too quiet for my liking, and if he doesn't post soon, I'll vote him.
Can Echo be nice enough to tell us how the hell does the mafia do a night kill??
Sure, read the second post. Read the rules while you're at it too, I'm sure you haven't.
Sure, read the second post. Read the rules while you're at it too, I'm sure you haven't.
Topic Starter
Vote Count
SFG (3) - kuwarudo, strager, 0_o
rust45 (2) - SFG, Pasonia
strager (2) - LadySuburu, adam
Pasonia (1) - rust45
Not voting: Wojjan
Day 1 ends in 23 hours! (I made a mistake in my other post, sorry.)
-- SFG is at L-2!
SFG (3) - kuwarudo, strager, 0_o
rust45 (2) - SFG, Pasonia
strager (2) - LadySuburu, adam
Pasonia (1) - rust45
Not voting: Wojjan
Day 1 ends in 23 hours! (I made a mistake in my other post, sorry.)
-- SFG is at L-2!
Thanks Echo 
I must've forgotten it---- no wait I haven't read that part, I usually just read the PMs about roles.
Also did I break a rule?
I must've forgotten it---- no wait I haven't read that part, I usually just read the PMs about roles.
Also did I break a rule?
Topic Starter
No, but you (that means everyone who hasn't) might want to acquaint yourself with them, since they're a bit different to the ones in Suburu's games.
This map has been deleted on the request of its creator. It is no longer available.
This map has been deleted on the request of its creator. It is no longer available.
ERRRRG I know it's total WIFOM but why is this making me think SFG isn't mafiaSaturos-fangirl wrote:
welp, i guess im getting lynched for scumhunting. w/e just make sure you find the scum, okay? ill see you guys again at endgame, hopefully with a town win rather than a mafia win.
pleasepleasepleasepleasePLEASE be smarter in this game than you were in M1, M2, and M3
0_o, you say that strager and SFG are the two you suspect, right?
I have a good feeling that SFG is not mafia, even before that post.
Would you mind lynching strager today, instead?
I have a good feeling that SFG is not mafia, even before that post.
Would you mind lynching strager today, instead?
Let's give it a shot
Unvote
vote strager
Unvote
vote strager
I know it's banwagoning and it will add suspicion to me but...
unvote
Vote: strager
unvote
Vote: strager
This map has been deleted on the request of its creator. It is no longer available.
This map has been deleted on the request of its creator. It is no longer available.
Wojjan, why would me protecting anyone be suspicious? If I think one player is more likely mafia, I will try to convince others to vote for them. The mafia DO NOT know who eachother are, so therefore wouldn't be a scumtell.
FoS: Wojjan
FoS: Wojjan
Wow, where did those posts come from?
Putting someone on L-1 is silly and dumb, especially in a somewhat RVS
Putting someone on L-1 is silly and dumb, especially in a somewhat RVS
- rust +1.5
If we're still in the RVS stage, we're doing something wrong.Wojjan wrote:
Wow, where did those posts come from?
Putting someone on L-1 is silly and dumb, especially in a somewhat RVS
- rust +1.5
My vote isn't random at all.
Also: There's no need to wait until deadline every single day in mafia games. If five people suspect that someone is mafia, we lynch them. Of course, you want to give them a chance to post and or claim before you do.
Unvote
Vote: 0_o
That vote on me was pretty wild. Can you explain your exact reasoning?
Vote: 0_o
That vote on me was pretty wild. Can you explain your exact reasoning?
crêpes, forgot that the Mafia doesn't know one another again.
Echo, what a dumb gimmick (no offense, mod is always right, yadda yadda)
Echo, what a dumb gimmick (no offense, mod is always right, yadda yadda)
- - LS: -1
-SFG: -0.5
Note: if you haven't noticed, I've been in and out. So, I may or may not be able to speak at times. If I'm gone longer than two days, I ask to be replaced. Same applies for BM1, LS.
LadySuburu wrote:
If we're still in the RVS stage, we're doing something wrong.
*Wojjan facepamlmsWojjan wrote:
Putting someone on L-1 is silly and dumb, especially in a somewhat RVS
Yet, if you put someone on L-1 it raises some suspicion. Why would he not give strager a chance of speaking? Why would he make way for a Hammer to instantly get him? Doesn't it seem weird? Especially since we got a lot to discuss, seeing the number of posts a moment.LadySuburu wrote:
Also: There's no need to wait until deadline every single day in mafia games. If five people suspect that someone is mafia, we lynch them. Of course, you want to give them a chance to post and or claim before you do.
As someone stated once before:
If someone were to hammer that quickly, they are most likely mafia. Sure, L-1 does place some suspicion, I agree. However, a hammer right now would be most like saying "Hey, I'm mafia, come lynch me."
There are rare cases that a townie hammers without waiting for some discussion, but those are rare.
However, I don't remember rust saying anything about suspecting strager. I need to reread some. *does so*
If someone were to hammer that quickly, they are most likely mafia. Sure, L-1 does place some suspicion, I agree. However, a hammer right now would be most like saying "Hey, I'm mafia, come lynch me."
There are rare cases that a townie hammers without waiting for some discussion, but those are rare.
However, I don't remember rust saying anything about suspecting strager. I need to reread some. *does so*
No I never did say I suspected strager before, but I have been thinking he's mafia for quite some time, I was thinking like 0_o in a sense. Sure suspect me right now but if your going to lynch me, at least wait till the next day.
Mmk, reading through, I don't see anything about rust really suspecting strager. It seems any of his strager-related votes were all RVS style.
Edit: Ninja'd.
Yes, I do suspect you some now rust.
I still want to lynch strager today.
Edit: Ninja'd.
Yes, I do suspect you some now rust.
I still want to lynch strager today.
Subi, and actually all of stragers bandwagon, I'd like you to think twice if your vote isn't really based on anything. We're on 5 to lynch today, so if we kill a townie today, and the mafia does so too, we only need three votes for a mafia to hop in and get a kill tomorrow. If they've coordiated at night, and decided to both get a vote on one, two votes can bring us in danger.
Also, my suspicion of rust went up by a notch for never saying why he voted strager before, and even now not clearly stating what of stragers behavior could be scummy
vote: rust45
Also, my suspicion of rust went up by a notch for never saying why he voted strager before, and even now not clearly stating what of stragers behavior could be scummy
- rust45: +1
vote: rust45
Wojjan. have you read very many of my posts?Wojjan wrote:
Subi, and actually all of stragers bandwagon, I'd like you to think twice if your vote isn't really based on anything. We're on 5 to lynch today, so if we kill a townie today, and the mafia does so too, we only need three votes for a mafia to hop in and get a kill tomorrow. If they've coordiated at night, and decided to both get a vote on one, two votes can bring us in danger.
Also, my suspicion of rust went up by a notch for never saying why he voted strager before, and even now not clearly stating what of stragers behavior could be scummyrust45 is now on 2.5 suspicion rate in my eyes, and the highest on my list. He hence gets my vote.
- rust45: +1
vote: rust45
Q's:
What's RVS?
What's Hammering?
What's RVS?
What's Hammering?
Random Vote Stagestrager wrote:
Q's:
What's RVS?
What's Hammering?
The last vote to lynch someone.
mod: replace kuwarudo and Pasonia if we dont see more activity from them in D2
i dunno why you guys decided to off strager instead of me, but im not altogether sure that strager is scum. he tends to have a reason to his crazy patterns, although i spose that reason could be mafia i would rather have more reason to be sure of it today.
kuwarudo, Pasonia please post more so we can actually have something to go on other than Pasonia's self-preservation, which as ive already said is kinda scummy.
rust is obviously a noob, he may be mafia or may not be mafia, but he's acting a bit like strager did in M2, minus the roleclaim.
Wojjan seems to have gone to the numbering system to try to figure out who is scum and who isnt, or possibly who would make a good lynch. hes also been corrected on the "mafia dont know each other" thing twice now, but i think he'd be intell-gah WIFOM
LS and adam havent really swung one way or the other in my mind as to whether scum or town yet. My conclusion is the person i suspect most is Pasonia right now
unvote
vote Pasonia
i dunno why you guys decided to off strager instead of me, but im not altogether sure that strager is scum. he tends to have a reason to his crazy patterns, although i spose that reason could be mafia i would rather have more reason to be sure of it today.
kuwarudo, Pasonia please post more so we can actually have something to go on other than Pasonia's self-preservation, which as ive already said is kinda scummy.
rust is obviously a noob, he may be mafia or may not be mafia, but he's acting a bit like strager did in M2, minus the roleclaim.
Wojjan seems to have gone to the numbering system to try to figure out who is scum and who isnt, or possibly who would make a good lynch. hes also been corrected on the "mafia dont know each other" thing twice now, but i think he'd be intell-gah WIFOM
LS and adam havent really swung one way or the other in my mind as to whether scum or town yet. My conclusion is the person i suspect most is Pasonia right now
unvote
vote Pasonia
LadySuburu, your main reasons for voting for me are outlined in the following posts:
viewtopic.php?p=152992#p152992
viewtopic.php?p=153782#p153782
Of me acting like kuu, I would appreciate specific examples. Even with supporting posts I doubt that's reason enough to vote for someone.
In the second post above, you show that rust45, SFG, and I (and to a lesser extend 0_o) are all pretty suspicious by our jumping on bandwagons. With the recent L-1 vote against me by rust45 (which you say looks pretty random) has your level of suspicion not changed? rust45 now has made two L-1 votes, whereas I have not made any. You explicitly mention that putting L-1 without reason is scummy: viewtopic.php?p=153787#p153787
viewtopic.php?p=152992#p152992
viewtopic.php?p=153782#p153782
Of me acting like kuu, I would appreciate specific examples. Even with supporting posts I doubt that's reason enough to vote for someone.
In the second post above, you show that rust45, SFG, and I (and to a lesser extend 0_o) are all pretty suspicious by our jumping on bandwagons. With the recent L-1 vote against me by rust45 (which you say looks pretty random) has your level of suspicion not changed? rust45 now has made two L-1 votes, whereas I have not made any. You explicitly mention that putting L-1 without reason is scummy: viewtopic.php?p=153787#p153787
SFG, What are your opinions on 0_o?
ahh i KNEW i was forgetting someone...strager wrote:
SFG, What are your opinions on 0_o?
0_o needs to post more, no opinion yet on him other than that
Main reasons for voting: If you trace through some of our conversations, you'll find there are other posts that have my reasons included as well. Example: My post on Page 10, and the resulting conversation from that.strager wrote:
LadySuburu, your main reasons for voting for me are outlined in the following posts:
viewtopic.php?p=152992#p152992
viewtopic.php?p=153782#p153782
Of me acting like kuu, I would appreciate specific examples. Even with supporting posts I doubt that's reason enough to vote for someone.
In the second post above, you show that rust45, SFG, and I (and to a lesser extend 0_o) are all pretty suspicious by our jumping on bandwagons. With the recent L-1 vote against me by rust45 (which you say looks pretty random) has your level of suspicion not changed? rust45 now has made two L-1 votes, whereas I have not made any. You explicitly mention that putting L-1 without reason is scummy: viewtopic.php?p=153787#p153787
Acting like kuu: You weren't acting as I know you to act, which is apperently less than I thought. You were acting much different than how you are now acting in defense.
rust45: Yes, he's raised in suspision. No, he's not as high as you yet, but he's close.
If others were for a rust lynch today, I wouldn't mind one either. At the moment, you are still slightly more suspicious in my mind, which is why I'm still voting for you.
The exact same reasoning could be applied to rust45 and SFG for tie-ing votes as well. I think rust45 even started the tie-ing thing (unsure).LadySuburu wrote:
Main reasons for voting: If you trace through some of our conversations, you'll find there are other posts that have my reasons included as well. Example: My post on Page 10, and the resulting conversation from that.
"setting a trend to get many people near lynch" -- I didn't really set the trend I think. I did start the "vote for yourself as a joke" thing which SFG followed.
If you're referring to my acting in M2, of course I'm acting differently. I'm in a different situation. I don't have a false role claim on my head, I'm not being heavily attacked by one or more highly skilled players very well, and I'm not a newbie. Again, I would like specific examples else your claim is worthless in my eyes.LadySuburu wrote:
Acting like kuu: You weren't acting as I know you to act, which is apperently less than I thought. You were acting much different than how you are now acting in defense.
1: I'll check to see who for sure started the near-lynch trend. I'll also see how involved you were in it.strager wrote:
The exact same reasoning could be applied to rust45 and SFG for tie-ing votes as well. I think rust45 even started the tie-ing thing (unsure).LadySuburu wrote:
Main reasons for voting: If you trace through some of our conversations, you'll find there are other posts that have my reasons included as well. Example: My post on Page 10, and the resulting conversation from that.
"setting a trend to get many people near lynch" -- I didn't really set the trend I think. I did start the "vote for yourself as a joke" thing which SFG followed.If you're referring to my acting in M2, of course I'm acting differently. I'm in a different situation. I don't have a false role claim on my head, I'm not being heavily attacked by one or more highly skilled players very well, and I'm not a newbie. Again, I would like specific examples else your claim is worthless in my eyes.LadySuburu wrote:
Acting like kuu: You weren't acting as I know you to act, which is apperently less than I thought. You were acting much different than how you are now acting in defense.
2: I'm not going to grab any specific examples, because you've already made a statement (see: underlined above) that makes me think there's absolutely no point in doing so.
Well for one I don't think it was that wild, I already said you and SFG were high on my list, and I recently started to have doubts about SFG's guilt.strager wrote:
That vote on me was pretty wild. Can you explain your exact reasoning?
I don't really have the time/energy right now to go through and make an extended post analysis, I have an assignment I have to finish in 4 hours..
Though I've done some thinking, and right now I actually think we should get rid of either Pas or kuwarudo. Yes, they can be prodded/replaced, but if they only respond when prodded/once every 24 hours, it could be a while before both of them are replaced, and it seems like every game we are left with people who we have no clue what to think about at the end. Sure we replaced Olinad eventually in M2, but it was really too little too late, we really had no idea what to think of Wojjan until the game was over. I don't know about you guys, but I don't want to get stuck in that situation again.
Therefore
unvote
vote Pasonia
EDIT: also, a vote count would be nice
Finally someone realizes this truth. This is the first game of Mafia I've ever played. Due to this I'm still not playing very well. I'm still trying to get the hang of this. And yes, I know I should've joined a newbie mafia game first.Saturos-fangirl wrote:
rust is obviously a noob, he may be mafia or may not be mafia, but he's acting a bit like strager did in M2, minus the roleclaim
I have nothing I feel like commenting on at this point in time.
Just posting so people know I'm actually reading.
Oh and instead of killing off people who don't talk straight away (which I think is a tactic that the mafia would consider using) you should encourage them to speak first, give them a day and if they still refuse to speak actively, kill them off. Lynching people who act like this first day might be a mistake because they could just be gathering information to use the next day (or they could be an aux role trying to hide.)
Just posting so people know I'm actually reading.
Oh and instead of killing off people who don't talk straight away (which I think is a tactic that the mafia would consider using) you should encourage them to speak first, give them a day and if they still refuse to speak actively, kill them off. Lynching people who act like this first day might be a mistake because they could just be gathering information to use the next day (or they could be an aux role trying to hide.)
Thing is, they are just as likely to be a mafia trying to hide. If they were gathering information for the next day, wouldn't they be asking questions and stimulating discussions as opposed to hiding in a corner the whole time?adam2046 wrote:
I have nothing I feel like commenting on at this point in time.
Just posting so people know I'm actually reading.
Oh and instead of killing off people who don't talk straight away (which I think is a tactic that the mafia would consider using) you should encourage them to speak first, give them a day and if they still refuse to speak actively, kill them off. Lynching people who act like this first day might be a mistake because they could just be gathering information to use the next day (or they could be an aux role trying to hide.)
Also I don't really see why mafia would want to get rid of quiet people, I would think they would want to have people no one knows anything about in the final days to cause confusion. (it worked the last 3 games...)
They've been prodded twice and we have told them several times that we need them to talk more, so I think they've been given more than a fair chance.
I'll have to go with adam on this issue. It seems 0_o is trying to kill anyone here on purpose, as if he's not really part of the Town. At least that's what I see of him.