strager wrote:
I'll have to go with adam on this issue. It seems 0_o is trying to kill anyone here on purpose, as if he's not really part of the Town. At least that's what I see of him.
"kill anyone here on purpose"? What? Firstly if I was really desperate to get rid of anyone I probably wouldn't have switched off of you after I got you on L-1 (inadvertently mind you, I didn't think rust would swoop in right after me).
My reasons for voting Pasonia come from the outcome of
every mafia game so far. We are left with one or two people we have no clue what to think of, making us unable to make a well-informed decision on who to lynch at LyLo. I'm thinking for the endgame here - the more information we have against everyone in the endgame, the better our chances of winning.
adam2046 wrote:
0_o wrote:
Also I don't really see why mafia would want to get rid of quiet people, I would think they would want to have people no one knows anything about in the final days to cause confusion. (it worked the last 3 games...)
Because it's easy to do, just like you're doing.
Well actually, the easy thing for mafia to do would be to keep their trap shut and let the town lynch anyone who isn't them. I, on the other hand,
do care about who is lynched, and think we should get rid of the dead weight that's gonna kill us at the end.
EDIT: Also, if it was Pas
alone who wasn't talking, I probably would let it slide for a day. But now there are
2 inactive players, and if we don't get rid of one today, there's a good shot we are gonna be at Day 3, 5 people, with someone we don't know anything about (basically the same situation we've been in every other game). We have a much better shot Day 3 if we have sufficient information about everyone there.