5:13 probably an indy. Maybe 5:12:1?
Sitting close to a 2 for 1. 4:13:1 seems a bit more reasonable.
Sitting close to a 2 for 1. 4:13:1 seems a bit more reasonable.
forum
Themeless Mafia Game (TOWN WIN!)
posted
Total Posts
416
Salvage wrote:
Hi guys, so this is my first mafia game hosted and hopefully not my last one .. i don't know if i'd really want to host another one but we'll see.
So well .. there is not much to say, registration right here and rules at the bottom, 15 players max (: .. roles are premade (not PyP) so yeah, go then love u all.
I am drunk. I counted the total players with the dead players.
Well given 15 I'd say 4 for sure.
Them deceptive strikes.
Them deceptive strikes.
I ended up motivating LS in N2 so okay.
If you wanna lynch me fine by me but I'll flip town~
If you wanna lynch me fine by me but I'll flip town~
You know, I actually believe that.
Just because it's not a ridiculous claim for once.
Just because it's not a ridiculous claim for once.
Mod: Prod Lilac please.
I've seen him lurking before and he still hasn't posted in like forever.
Other than that, yeah, I'm suspicious of 0_o simply for coming out of nowhere and then going, "Yeah, he's pretty much the best choice to lynch today. Any objections to hammering him?" Why ask to hammer in that case? The only reason to ask is if you're consciously trying to come off as a cautious townie. If you were town then you'd just go for the hammer because, as he just said, there was pretty much nothing to lose. He *knew* that, but asked anyway... Probably because, again, he wanted to come off as pro-town.
Vote: 0_o
I've seen him lurking before and he still hasn't posted in like forever.
Other than that, yeah, I'm suspicious of 0_o simply for coming out of nowhere and then going, "Yeah, he's pretty much the best choice to lynch today. Any objections to hammering him?" Why ask to hammer in that case? The only reason to ask is if you're consciously trying to come off as a cautious townie. If you were town then you'd just go for the hammer because, as he just said, there was pretty much nothing to lose. He *knew* that, but asked anyway... Probably because, again, he wanted to come off as pro-town.
Vote: 0_o
you're welcome by the way.
Ekaru has a point with 0_o but it's something I am not that confident on.
By the way since I've been leading like crazy odds are I'm dying tonight or tomorrow. Town Oracle. Each night I get to ask questions about the setup.
First night I checked the amount of scum, there are four mafia total.
Second I asked if the mafia has any investigative roles, I got a no. There's no scum rolecop so if there's a town one and he can confirm someone else's role then THEY ARE TOWN, NO DOUBT.
I'll check night three to see if there are any protectives around so a cop can claim unless anyone else has a better idea.
Vote bmin11
we are waaay past lynching lurkers over that alone, scummy scumscum
Ekaru has a point with 0_o but it's something I am not that confident on.
By the way since I've been leading like crazy odds are I'm dying tonight or tomorrow. Town Oracle. Each night I get to ask questions about the setup.
First night I checked the amount of scum, there are four mafia total.
Second I asked if the mafia has any investigative roles, I got a no. There's no scum rolecop so if there's a town one and he can confirm someone else's role then THEY ARE TOWN, NO DOUBT.
I'll check night three to see if there are any protectives around so a cop can claim unless anyone else has a better idea.
Vote bmin11
we are waaay past lynching lurkers over that alone, scummy scumscum
Salvage I echo the sentiment of prodding/replacing all the lurkerlosers also you forgot to add the daystart link into the OP
Topic Starter
Adding that, Prodding Lilac, going to take a pee.
Yeah. I only got the modem last night...
I'm willing to believe DxS is town if LS confirms the motivation. Sync v. Ekaru, Sync would be the better lynch.
I want to ask the people who want DxS lynched as the what the actual reason is...because I don't think I've seen one reason about him yet at all.
I'm willing to believe DxS is town if LS confirms the motivation. Sync v. Ekaru, Sync would be the better lynch.
I want to ask the people who want DxS lynched as the what the actual reason is...because I don't think I've seen one reason about him yet at all.
He's scummy, duh.
Wow, that was so convincing. Cause saying what I did at night and continuously yelling I am Town makes me scum. I guess if you want to say anything, D1 and the beginning of D2 is really the only time he did anything. An initial vote on Newbie with apparently "no strong arguments, just who do you want to keep D1" then votes him beginning D2 straight off the bat because it seems to be "He didn't vote for/ignored Newbie."
I'm okay with a 0_o and a bmin lynch, just saying.
I'm okay with a 0_o and a bmin lynch, just saying.
if you want a tip use names instead of pronouns it makes for amuuuch easier read
For the record I actually think DxS is town. Sarcasm is lost in text.
Essentially, I was pretending to be DxS in that second sentence.Lilac wrote:
Wow, that was so convincing. Cause saying what I did at night and continuously yelling I am Town makes me scum.
For the second bit, he voted for Newbie initially with no reasoning...and then has a reason which could have been said with his vote as he was near end of day.
Remember, I don't think he's actually fully mafia.
wellllll DxS claims motivator and when LS gets in here we'll hear the jist of it
I agree with that much.
This. He already said he motivated me and I can confirm this, so if LS also confirms then he's definitely town.Wojjan wrote:
wellllll DxS claims motivator and when LS gets in here we'll hear the jist of it
Well motivator isn't per se town, 0_o can account for that. It does however confirm his role and giving him targets to motivate or else he gets caught in the act will also keep scum motivator busy
Oh, okay. Good point!Wojjan wrote:
Well motivator isn't per se town, 0_o can account for that. It does however confirm his role and giving him targets to motivate or else he gets caught in the act will also keep scum motivator busy
DxS's motivation will take place on me next night. So I technically couldn't confirm it, if it weren't for the fact that me and DxS are Masons and I saw his action. (The confirmed to each other type, I PMed Salvage about this.)
I don't think motivating me was a great idea though.
I don't think motivating me was a great idea though.
Topic Starter
can u stop correcting me plsssssssssssssssss
I'm still up for a lurker lynch, because of how inactive the mafia side was even we had two mafia lynches. We even had a no NK situation and since Salvage is choosing the least beneficial, I'm guessing Salvage just directed the shot to someone with protections and such. I'm basing this on a claim that mafia has lost their interest for this game.
Reason I thought DxS could be mafia was because of his meta. Most cases, he will simply ask for a lynch whenever he was being suspected. Well, he pulled it again and that pretty much makes my reasoning back to zero, so I'm not up for DxS lynch anymore.
EDIT: English
Reason I thought DxS could be mafia was because of his meta. Most cases, he will simply ask for a lynch whenever he was being suspected. Well, he pulled it again and that pretty much makes my reasoning back to zero, so I'm not up for DxS lynch anymore.
EDIT: English
Well assuming that their kill got redirected to a protected is entirely baseless, scum could just as probably outright his the protected. It's not enough to lynch a lurker over
I don't even see why you would see "no kill" and assume that instead of "sucessful doc protect" it's "maf was all afk and got autoprotected"
Wojjan wrote:
I don't even see why you would see "no kill" and assume that instead of "sucessful doc protect" it's "maf was all afk and got autoprotected"
I'm basing this on a claim that mafia has lost their interest for this game.
AKA I'm suggesting a possibility and also suggesting not to overlook those lurkers.
is this the claim if so vote syncSync wrote:
lol'd
is mafia completely inactive or some shit
it's true though
same thing happened in robot mafia
or something blocking nightkills could of happened
same thing happened in robot mafia
or something blocking nightkills could of happened
The logical conclusion is that a protection occurred.
Assuming inactive mafia is.... hasty.
Assuming inactive mafia is.... hasty.
DxS, motivate me tonight and i'll believe you. thanks
also, watching you guys talk. I'm on the fence today, no clearly obvious scum like days 1 and 2 lawl.
also, watching you guys talk. I'm on the fence today, no clearly obvious scum like days 1 and 2 lawl.
No opinion on Facey at all?
Also time for a long awaited snooze.
Also time for a long awaited snooze.
I just didn't wanna kill the discussion by hammering. If I had hammered, one could just as easily say that I wanted to stifle discussion since he was pretty much dead anyway.Rantai wrote:
18 players. I'd say 4 possibly 5 but that's pushing it.
Also; Vote: 0_oEcho, justifying possible town lynch (under the guise of 'safe'), fishing for hammer confirmation. To a lesser degree a vote on Mashley in rvs (distancing anyone?).0_o wrote:
Yeah, even if he is telling the truth there's nothing about the role that really clears him. Worse case scenario we mislynch a scummy town doublevoter, which as far as aux roles go, is one of the safer ones to lose.
Any objections to a hammer?
And really, distancing via RVS vote? That's kinda grasping.
Anyway, I agree with bmin. Having players who lurked the whole game at LyLo sucks, and I think it would be best to cut them off while we still have the breathing room to do so.
vote Lilac
Mildly suspicious of Rantai (might be subconsciously OMGUS, but nonetheless)