more like mafia motivator who last minute vote changed in an effort to not lynch their mafia buddyDeathxShinigami wrote:
Nope.
Roleclaim: Motivator
I motivated Ekaru N1. Carry on now.
forum
Themeless Mafia Game (TOWN WIN!)
posted
Total Posts
416
Topic Starter
JInxyjem replaces -Newbie-
Ivalset replaces pieguy1372
Ivalset replaces pieguy1372
Yo
I won't be able to read nor post until.a few.hours, I still have.classes
those dots are.typos ignore them
I won't be able to read nor post until.a few.hours, I still have.classes
those dots are.typos ignore them
Evening folks.
Going to reread the thread, etc.
Going to reread the thread, etc.
hi
From what I can see right now, DxS is suspicious to me. He was also voting for Newbie over animask in Day 1, with a pretty weak reason too.
Then he was suggested as a lynch by foul and claimed right there and then, as a motivator who targeted Ekaru. Ekaru's reply:
But then again, this is the man who claimed Innocent Child in Celebrity, so I dunno
Then he was suggested as a lynch by foul and claimed right there and then, as a motivator who targeted Ekaru. Ekaru's reply:
However, the only thing that doesn't go well with my suspicions is that DxS could have made much better claims than one that's easily refuted. Possibly roleblocked?Ekaru wrote:
For the record, I got no notification that I was motivated. You guys can take that as you will.DeathxShinigami wrote:
Nope.
Roleclaim: Motivator
I motivated Ekaru N1. Carry on now.
But then again, this is the man who claimed Innocent Child in Celebrity, so I dunno
Okay, I got the motivation notification overnight. Salvage just missed it the first time, apparently. XP
...k.
Around 42 more hours
This line stands out to me pretty heavily. It seems like at the last minute of day 1, there was a fair amount of vote shuffling in a misguided attempt to avoid lynching animask via tied votes. DxS brought animask's votes to 3, then animask pushed NoHItter up to 2, then DxS unvotes and votes for Newbie instead, possibly hoping that animask going from 3 -> 2 would put him behind NoHItter in the lynch line.Rantai wrote:
Huh... pretty sure that's a NoHItter lynch if I'm looking at this right.
For this reasoning I find all of Mashley, DxS and Rantai to be suspicious in different degrees.
Mashley for clearly attempting to save animask by persuading people to vote for a lurker instead.
DxS for his actions - pushing animask above 2 then back down to 2.
and Rantai for misreading the tied vote rules and bringing attention to the vote changes.
I'm quite comfortable with a Mashley lynch right now, so Vote: Mashley
well to be fair, even though DxS looks scummy, if it weren't for his vote + unvote animask wouldnt have been lynched...Ivalset wrote:
This line stands out to me pretty heavily. It seems like at the last minute of day 1, there was a fair amount of vote shuffling in a misguided attempt to avoid lynching animask via tied votes. DxS brought animask's votes to 3, then animask pushed NoHItter up to 2, then DxS unvotes and votes for Newbie instead, possibly hoping that animask going from 3 -> 2 would put him behind NoHItter in the lynch line.Rantai wrote:
Huh... pretty sure that's a NoHItter lynch if I'm looking at this right.
For this reasoning I find all of Mashley, DxS and Rantai to be suspicious in different degrees.
Mashley for clearly attempting to save animask by persuading people to vote for a lurker instead.
DxS for his actions - pushing animask above 2 then back down to 2.
and Rantai for misreading the tied vote rules and bringing attention to the vote changes.
I'm quite comfortable with a Mashley lynch right now, so Vote: Mashley
Pretty sure he still would have. Animask was at 2 votes and at the top of the lynch list before dxs voted and unvoted.
Huh. No.
I went through it carefully. Hitter was the first to 2 votes, not animask. This is based off an earlier game (ages ago, can't remember which game) where the mechanics worked via:
Take that as you will. In the end it was a mod decision where my words hold no sway.
I went through it carefully. Hitter was the first to 2 votes, not animask. This is based off an earlier game (ages ago, can't remember which game) where the mechanics worked via:
SPOILER
A is at 2
B is 3
B to be lynched
A is at 2
B is unvoted to 2
A to be lynched
B is 3
B to be lynched
A is at 2
B is unvoted to 2
A to be lynched
Take that as you will. In the end it was a mod decision where my words hold no sway.
And yes, I do know that was your argument against me.
Those were mechanics introduced into two's first mafia game but were changed before the game started. Interestingly enough, you were involved in the discussion.
viewtopic.php?p=1027357#p1027357
Discussion on the tied vote rule is on the first two pages.
viewtopic.php?p=1330260#p1330260 is where animask is solidified at 2 votes and never falls below that. At that point in time, animask is second on the lynch list - viewtopic.php?p=1330461#p1330461
Later, sync brings ekaru up to 3 votes but then unvotes, then animask unvotes ekaru and seals his own fate by bringing himself to the top of the lynch list. Furthermore, Nohitter drops to 1 vote viewtopic.php?p=1333209#p1333209 when mashley votes for newbie instead. When animask switches to nohitter and puts him at 2 votes, animask is still first to be lynched because he reached 2 votes before nohitter did.
Also, there's an example of how tied votes works in this game in the first post!
viewtopic.php?p=1027357#p1027357
Discussion on the tied vote rule is on the first two pages.
viewtopic.php?p=1330260#p1330260 is where animask is solidified at 2 votes and never falls below that. At that point in time, animask is second on the lynch list - viewtopic.php?p=1330461#p1330461
Later, sync brings ekaru up to 3 votes but then unvotes, then animask unvotes ekaru and seals his own fate by bringing himself to the top of the lynch list. Furthermore, Nohitter drops to 1 vote viewtopic.php?p=1333209#p1333209 when mashley votes for newbie instead. When animask switches to nohitter and puts him at 2 votes, animask is still first to be lynched because he reached 2 votes before nohitter did.
Also, there's an example of how tied votes works in this game in the first post!
The first post doesn't cover 3 to 2~ (it's a 2v2 situation)
Though thanks for reminding me where that discussion took place. It seems I got the original mechanic stuck in my head.
Well then, that's cleared up for me.
Though thanks for reminding me where that discussion took place. It seems I got the original mechanic stuck in my head.
Well then, that's cleared up for me.
will post after dinner. I'm so behind of this game orz
I understand that the voting was very odd last night. They could have really just focused someone so animask won't get lynched. However, one post animask has made gave me a pretty bad impression.
Vote: Mashley
This is very odd and makes me pretty confident that animask is trying to distance Mashley. Like, he explains a lot about Mashley, but ends up voting for NoHItter without his own reasoning :<animask wrote:
Fos Mashley
*Reasons why he FoSes Mashley*
Vote: NoHItter
Vote: Mashley
Topic Starter
VOTE COUNT:
Mashley (5) - foulcoon, Ekaru, Wojjan, Ivalset, bmin11
Not voting (8) -LadySuburu, JInxjyjem, DeathxShinigami, Mashley, 0_o, Sync, Rantai, Lilac
Mashley (5) - foulcoon, Ekaru, Wojjan, Ivalset, bmin11
Not voting (8) -LadySuburu, JInxjyjem, DeathxShinigami, Mashley, 0_o, Sync, Rantai, Lilac
vote Mashley
SHEEP SHEEP SHEEP SHEEP
actually the relationship between animask and mashley is pretty hilarious
SHEEP SHEEP SHEEP SHEEP
actually the relationship between animask and mashley is pretty hilarious
Roleclaim Doublevoter
Seriously I can't even defend myself against this... My day one vote looked scummy out of pure coincidence, and if people are so convinced that I'm scum there's nothing I can do. My second vote shows as anonymous and is cast through PM, which is weird since as I understand it's usually just cast in the thread through 'vote 2:' or whatever... I dunno about that though.
Seriously I can't even defend myself against this... My day one vote looked scummy out of pure coincidence, and if people are so convinced that I'm scum there's nothing I can do. My second vote shows as anonymous and is cast through PM, which is weird since as I understand it's usually just cast in the thread through 'vote 2:' or whatever... I dunno about that though.
inb4 scum jumps in and hammers me
Well proving a double voter isn't hard I guess.
But that role can swing both ways so er yeah, not sure if I can believe you're town right now.
But that role can swing both ways so er yeah, not sure if I can believe you're town right now.
Argh, the problem with double voters are that they can easily be a vote stealer. We could try to tie the vote up until N-1 with someone majority and make Mashley to hammer to see if the vote was stolen was double voted.
Well, if you're a double voter then vote for someone twice and we'll see it as anonymous on the votecount. That seems pretty easy to test.
We can prove his claim, but we can't prove that he's town.
As a purely role-based look:
Anonymous doublevoter benefits scum more than town. (Is better as a scum role)
Open doublevoter benefits town more than scum. (Is better as a town role)
Now, with that being said we've had tons of roles in recent games that would generally be thought of as scum-aligned that aren't. I'm not sure that his claim being true or not should change anything about how scummy he is.
As a purely role-based look:
Anonymous doublevoter benefits scum more than town. (Is better as a scum role)
Open doublevoter benefits town more than scum. (Is better as a town role)
Now, with that being said we've had tons of roles in recent games that would generally be thought of as scum-aligned that aren't. I'm not sure that his claim being true or not should change anything about how scummy he is.
Yeah, even if he is telling the truth there's nothing about the role that really clears him. Worse case scenario we mislynch a scummy town doublevoter, which as far as aux roles go, is one of the safer ones to lose.
Any objections to a hammer?
Any objections to a hammer?
Oh right
Vote foulcoon
Second vote should show up in the next votecount.
Vote foulcoon
Second vote should show up in the next votecount.
Hm, day ended 2 hours ago I believe
Or did I fuck up times again
Or did I fuck up times again
Topic Starter
VOTE COUNT:
Mashley (5) - foulcoon, Ekaru, Wojjan, Ivalset, bmin11
foulcoon (1) - Mashley
Mashley (1) - Billy Bob
Not voting (7) -LadySuburu, JInxjyjem, DeathxShinigami, 0_o, Sync, Rantai, Lilac
Mashley - Mafia 1-Shot Janitor - Lynched D2
IT IS NOW NIGHT 2, DEADLINE IS IN 24 HOURS
Mashley (5) - foulcoon, Ekaru, Wojjan, Ivalset, bmin11
foulcoon (1) - Mashley
Mashley (1) - Billy Bob
Not voting (7) -LadySuburu, JInxjyjem, DeathxShinigami, 0_o, Sync, Rantai, Lilac
Mashley - Mafia 1-Shot Janitor - Lynched D2
IT IS NOW NIGHT 2, DEADLINE IS IN 24 HOURS
Topic Starter
Nobody died.
IT IS NOW DAY 3, DEADLINE IS IN 72 HOURS
IT IS NOW DAY 3, DEADLINE IS IN 72 HOURS
lol'd
is mafia completely inactive or some shit
is mafia completely inactive or some shit
you guys love me.
okay im thinking DxS for lynch
also thinking LS is town
okay im thinking DxS for lynch
also thinking LS is town
first off im thinking one of the two replacement people could be mafia. just depends on who was more likely, pieguy or -Newbie-
also read the bold:
any thoughts?
also read the bold:
havent considered the possibility that sync and or ekaru are mafia yet.Ivalset wrote:
Those were mechanics introduced into two's first mafia game but were changed before the game started. Interestingly enough, you were involved in the discussion.
viewtopic.php?p=1027357#p1027357
Discussion on the tied vote rule is on the first two pages.
viewtopic.php?p=1330260#p1330260 is where animask is solidified at 2 votes and never falls below that. At that point in time, animask is second on the lynch list - viewtopic.php?p=1330461#p1330461
Later, sync brings ekaru up to 3 votes but then unvotes, then animask unvotes ekaru and seals his own fate by bringing himself to the top of the lynch list. Furthermore, Nohitter drops to 1 vote viewtopic.php?p=1333209#p1333209 when mashley votes for newbie instead. When animask switches to nohitter and puts him at 2 votes, animask is still first to be lynched because he reached 2 votes before nohitter did.
Also, there's an example of how tied votes works in this game in the first post!
any thoughts?
I don't think Ekaru is mafia simply because it seems ridiculous to allow animask to be lynched that easily d1.
I'm honestly even more surprised that no one died.
I'm fine with a DxS lynch and maybe a Sync lynch. Really not convinced on an Ekaru lynch.
I'm honestly even more surprised that no one died.
I'm fine with a DxS lynch and maybe a Sync lynch. Really not convinced on an Ekaru lynch.
havent considered the possibility that sync and or ekaru are mafia yet.If I was mafia then I would've voted for NoHItter on day one, not animask. ;P
any thoughts?
I'm up Lilac just purely for his inactiveness.
By the way, how many mafias do you guys expect?
By the way, how many mafias do you guys expect?
18 players. I'd say 4 possibly 5 but that's pushing it.
Also; Vote: 0_o
Also; Vote: 0_o
Echo, justifying possible town lynch (under the guise of 'safe'), fishing for hammer confirmation. To a lesser degree a vote on Mashley in rvs (distancing anyone?).0_o wrote:
Yeah, even if he is telling the truth there's nothing about the role that really clears him. Worse case scenario we mislynch a scummy town doublevoter, which as far as aux roles go, is one of the safer ones to lose.
Any objections to a hammer?
Good point
My lynch list: Lilac, DxS, 0_o
My lynch list: Lilac, DxS, 0_o
You must be drunk.Rantai wrote:
18 players. I'd say 4 possibly 5 but that's pushing it.
5:13 probably an indy. Maybe 5:12:1?
Sitting close to a 2 for 1. 4:13:1 seems a bit more reasonable.
Sitting close to a 2 for 1. 4:13:1 seems a bit more reasonable.
Salvage wrote:
Hi guys, so this is my first mafia game hosted and hopefully not my last one .. i don't know if i'd really want to host another one but we'll see.
So well .. there is not much to say, registration right here and rules at the bottom, 15 players max (: .. roles are premade (not PyP) so yeah, go then love u all.
I am drunk. I counted the total players with the dead players.
Well given 15 I'd say 4 for sure.
Them deceptive strikes.
Them deceptive strikes.
I ended up motivating LS in N2 so okay.
If you wanna lynch me fine by me but I'll flip town~
If you wanna lynch me fine by me but I'll flip town~
You know, I actually believe that.
Just because it's not a ridiculous claim for once.
Just because it's not a ridiculous claim for once.
Mod: Prod Lilac please.
I've seen him lurking before and he still hasn't posted in like forever.
Other than that, yeah, I'm suspicious of 0_o simply for coming out of nowhere and then going, "Yeah, he's pretty much the best choice to lynch today. Any objections to hammering him?" Why ask to hammer in that case? The only reason to ask is if you're consciously trying to come off as a cautious townie. If you were town then you'd just go for the hammer because, as he just said, there was pretty much nothing to lose. He *knew* that, but asked anyway... Probably because, again, he wanted to come off as pro-town.
Vote: 0_o
I've seen him lurking before and he still hasn't posted in like forever.
Other than that, yeah, I'm suspicious of 0_o simply for coming out of nowhere and then going, "Yeah, he's pretty much the best choice to lynch today. Any objections to hammering him?" Why ask to hammer in that case? The only reason to ask is if you're consciously trying to come off as a cautious townie. If you were town then you'd just go for the hammer because, as he just said, there was pretty much nothing to lose. He *knew* that, but asked anyway... Probably because, again, he wanted to come off as pro-town.
Vote: 0_o
you're welcome by the way.
Ekaru has a point with 0_o but it's something I am not that confident on.
By the way since I've been leading like crazy odds are I'm dying tonight or tomorrow. Town Oracle. Each night I get to ask questions about the setup.
First night I checked the amount of scum, there are four mafia total.
Second I asked if the mafia has any investigative roles, I got a no. There's no scum rolecop so if there's a town one and he can confirm someone else's role then THEY ARE TOWN, NO DOUBT.
I'll check night three to see if there are any protectives around so a cop can claim unless anyone else has a better idea.
Vote bmin11
we are waaay past lynching lurkers over that alone, scummy scumscum
Ekaru has a point with 0_o but it's something I am not that confident on.
By the way since I've been leading like crazy odds are I'm dying tonight or tomorrow. Town Oracle. Each night I get to ask questions about the setup.
First night I checked the amount of scum, there are four mafia total.
Second I asked if the mafia has any investigative roles, I got a no. There's no scum rolecop so if there's a town one and he can confirm someone else's role then THEY ARE TOWN, NO DOUBT.
I'll check night three to see if there are any protectives around so a cop can claim unless anyone else has a better idea.
Vote bmin11
we are waaay past lynching lurkers over that alone, scummy scumscum
Salvage I echo the sentiment of prodding/replacing all the lurkerlosers also you forgot to add the daystart link into the OP
Topic Starter
Adding that, Prodding Lilac, going to take a pee.
Yeah. I only got the modem last night...
I'm willing to believe DxS is town if LS confirms the motivation. Sync v. Ekaru, Sync would be the better lynch.
I want to ask the people who want DxS lynched as the what the actual reason is...because I don't think I've seen one reason about him yet at all.
I'm willing to believe DxS is town if LS confirms the motivation. Sync v. Ekaru, Sync would be the better lynch.
I want to ask the people who want DxS lynched as the what the actual reason is...because I don't think I've seen one reason about him yet at all.
He's scummy, duh.
Wow, that was so convincing. Cause saying what I did at night and continuously yelling I am Town makes me scum. I guess if you want to say anything, D1 and the beginning of D2 is really the only time he did anything. An initial vote on Newbie with apparently "no strong arguments, just who do you want to keep D1" then votes him beginning D2 straight off the bat because it seems to be "He didn't vote for/ignored Newbie."
I'm okay with a 0_o and a bmin lynch, just saying.
I'm okay with a 0_o and a bmin lynch, just saying.
if you want a tip use names instead of pronouns it makes for amuuuch easier read
For the record I actually think DxS is town. Sarcasm is lost in text.
Essentially, I was pretending to be DxS in that second sentence.Lilac wrote:
Wow, that was so convincing. Cause saying what I did at night and continuously yelling I am Town makes me scum.
For the second bit, he voted for Newbie initially with no reasoning...and then has a reason which could have been said with his vote as he was near end of day.
Remember, I don't think he's actually fully mafia.
wellllll DxS claims motivator and when LS gets in here we'll hear the jist of it
I agree with that much.
This. He already said he motivated me and I can confirm this, so if LS also confirms then he's definitely town.Wojjan wrote:
wellllll DxS claims motivator and when LS gets in here we'll hear the jist of it
Well motivator isn't per se town, 0_o can account for that. It does however confirm his role and giving him targets to motivate or else he gets caught in the act will also keep scum motivator busy
Oh, okay. Good point!Wojjan wrote:
Well motivator isn't per se town, 0_o can account for that. It does however confirm his role and giving him targets to motivate or else he gets caught in the act will also keep scum motivator busy
DxS's motivation will take place on me next night. So I technically couldn't confirm it, if it weren't for the fact that me and DxS are Masons and I saw his action. (The confirmed to each other type, I PMed Salvage about this.)
I don't think motivating me was a great idea though.
I don't think motivating me was a great idea though.
Topic Starter
can u stop correcting me plsssssssssssssssss
I'm still up for a lurker lynch, because of how inactive the mafia side was even we had two mafia lynches. We even had a no NK situation and since Salvage is choosing the least beneficial, I'm guessing Salvage just directed the shot to someone with protections and such. I'm basing this on a claim that mafia has lost their interest for this game.
Reason I thought DxS could be mafia was because of his meta. Most cases, he will simply ask for a lynch whenever he was being suspected. Well, he pulled it again and that pretty much makes my reasoning back to zero, so I'm not up for DxS lynch anymore.
EDIT: English
Reason I thought DxS could be mafia was because of his meta. Most cases, he will simply ask for a lynch whenever he was being suspected. Well, he pulled it again and that pretty much makes my reasoning back to zero, so I'm not up for DxS lynch anymore.
EDIT: English
Well assuming that their kill got redirected to a protected is entirely baseless, scum could just as probably outright his the protected. It's not enough to lynch a lurker over
I don't even see why you would see "no kill" and assume that instead of "sucessful doc protect" it's "maf was all afk and got autoprotected"
Wojjan wrote:
I don't even see why you would see "no kill" and assume that instead of "sucessful doc protect" it's "maf was all afk and got autoprotected"
I'm basing this on a claim that mafia has lost their interest for this game.
AKA I'm suggesting a possibility and also suggesting not to overlook those lurkers.
is this the claim if so vote syncSync wrote:
lol'd
is mafia completely inactive or some shit
it's true though
same thing happened in robot mafia
or something blocking nightkills could of happened
same thing happened in robot mafia
or something blocking nightkills could of happened
The logical conclusion is that a protection occurred.
Assuming inactive mafia is.... hasty.
Assuming inactive mafia is.... hasty.
DxS, motivate me tonight and i'll believe you. thanks
also, watching you guys talk. I'm on the fence today, no clearly obvious scum like days 1 and 2 lawl.
also, watching you guys talk. I'm on the fence today, no clearly obvious scum like days 1 and 2 lawl.
No opinion on Facey at all?
Also time for a long awaited snooze.
Also time for a long awaited snooze.
I just didn't wanna kill the discussion by hammering. If I had hammered, one could just as easily say that I wanted to stifle discussion since he was pretty much dead anyway.Rantai wrote:
18 players. I'd say 4 possibly 5 but that's pushing it.
Also; Vote: 0_oEcho, justifying possible town lynch (under the guise of 'safe'), fishing for hammer confirmation. To a lesser degree a vote on Mashley in rvs (distancing anyone?).0_o wrote:
Yeah, even if he is telling the truth there's nothing about the role that really clears him. Worse case scenario we mislynch a scummy town doublevoter, which as far as aux roles go, is one of the safer ones to lose.
Any objections to a hammer?
And really, distancing via RVS vote? That's kinda grasping.
Anyway, I agree with bmin. Having players who lurked the whole game at LyLo sucks, and I think it would be best to cut them off while we still have the breathing room to do so.
vote Lilac
Mildly suspicious of Rantai (might be subconsciously OMGUS, but nonetheless)
Lurking?
I was gone without a modem for several days. I made that clear.
I was gone without a modem for several days. I made that clear.
Oh, sorry, must have skimmed over that part.
unvote
Time get get busaaayyy.
unvote
Time get get busaaayyy.
Yeah today feels like D1 now. D2 felt like D3/D4 in most games.
No opinion at the moment.
No opinion at the moment.
didn't even know he was in the gameRantai wrote:
No opinion on Facey at all?
lurk2themax and vote for another "lurker"
faceman got jokes
That awkward moment when someone doesn't know you're in a mafia game.
I think what Rantai said is really the only lead I see other than Sync and Ekaru but that's kinda minor in comparison...
I think what Rantai said is really the only lead I see other than Sync and Ekaru but that's kinda minor in comparison...
Yeah, like I said earlier I know it's hypocritical, but I still think it holds.foulcoon wrote:
didn't even know he was in the gameRantai wrote:
No opinion on Facey at all?
lurk2themax and vote for another "lurker"
faceman got jokes
While I really am trying to get back into it, my heart just hasn't been in it lately so I honestly can't tell you for sure whether my activity levels will increase or not. If you do feel like I'm dead weight then it very well may be for the best to you to lynch me now instead of risking me being the unknown factor at LyLo.
But again, I'm trying.
Oh man.
I feel like the biggest dick ever by reading that.
I feel like the biggest dick ever by reading that.
hi I'm back will read after a nice rest
I saw this when night came but then I forgot when I reached home
Mash flipped Janitor, but there was a 2nd anon vote on foul at the end of D2, so mafia probably has a role that modifies votes and Mash borrowed his role to fakeclaim with.
I might be stretching it far here but if that's the case, then the mafia wouldn't have been inactive at that point unlike what bmin assumed since someone had to back Mash up on the doublevoter thing.
Mash flipped Janitor, but there was a 2nd anon vote on foul at the end of D2, so mafia probably has a role that modifies votes and Mash borrowed his role to fakeclaim with.
I might be stretching it far here but if that's the case, then the mafia wouldn't have been inactive at that point unlike what bmin assumed since someone had to back Mash up on the doublevoter thing.
Actually no. I'm beginning to think that all the mafia have 1 shot provable fakeclaims (similar to LS's games)
IF this is true then I'm taking all provable claims with suspicion.
IF this is true then I'm taking all provable claims with suspicion.
Plausible, but seems dickish if the provable part doesn't flip.
...Did LS flip fakeclaims
...Did LS flip fakeclaims
No he didn't
Yeah, definitely a possibility there.
Yeah, definitely a possibility there.
So wait, proving my role by motivating Foulcoon?
I suppose since you won't believe my for once logical claim.
Also, Eka, Eka, ruuuuu where are you?
I suppose since you won't believe my for once logical claim.
Also, Eka, Eka, ruuuuu where are you?
I'm right here. >_>DeathxShinigami wrote:
So wait, proving my role by motivating Foulcoon?
I suppose since you won't believe my for once logical claim.
Also, Eka, Eka, ruuuuu where are you?
Jinkeys!Ekaru wrote:
I'm right here. >_>
Short recap:
So basically LS claimed Mason with DxS, and foul wants DxS to motivate him
Wojjan claimed Oracle. Has confirmed 4 maf, no maf investigative, and then calls out bmin for suggesting a lurker lynch
So yeah
So basically LS claimed Mason with DxS, and foul wants DxS to motivate him
Wojjan claimed Oracle. Has confirmed 4 maf, no maf investigative, and then calls out bmin for suggesting a lurker lynch
So yeah
We can just sit here and glare at each other until it's a nolynch
or we can vote bmin off we have pleeeenty of mislynches so going at a scummy ISO plus voting lilac for lurhing day fucking 3 is good enough for me at least
or we can vote bmin off we have pleeeenty of mislynches so going at a scummy ISO plus voting lilac for lurhing day fucking 3 is good enough for me at least
Explain my scummy ISO and tell me what was wrong about keeping the possibility open? Should we just blindly let those lurkers slip by just because "it is D3"? We could always have another pieguy if you want I guess >_>