luxury or sport
forum
Mercedes AMG or BMW Competition
posted
Total Posts
45
Topic Starter
i think Mercedes-AMG.
I never got the hype behind BMW Competition, In my opinion AMG is better
BYD.
Real car lovers will say the Fiat Multipla above all.
[EXTREMELY LOUD INCORRECT BUZZER]Spamix wrote:
Tesla.Karmine wrote:
BYD.
AMG is the "sporty" sector in Mercedes, as well as "M competition" for bmw
so they're both supposed to be sports versions of a car.
anyway, nowadays? I would go with a CLE63 from mercedes, the german v8 is pure joy, if we're going back to the 80's and 90's I would go with the M3 from bmw
so they're both supposed to be sports versions of a car.
anyway, nowadays? I would go with a CLE63 from mercedes, the german v8 is pure joy, if we're going back to the 80's and 90's I would go with the M3 from bmw
its rare to see a true M model, just be aware when its something like "330i M" it means it has the M pack, its not an M model, it has some better brakes and other little things... now, when it has an "M3" in the badge, its the real deal, and probably a very fun car.hyperastro wrote:
I never got the hype behind BMW Competition, In my opinion AMG is better
the 2015 535i came with 6 cylinders.
the 2015 M5 came with 10 cylinders.
obs: 330i - 3 = series 3, 30 = 3.0 engine, i = fuel injection.
M3 - M = Motorsport, 3 = series 3. (its the same car basically, just with a bigger engine and more aggressive tune for the track)
With the current build quality? hard no.Karmine wrote:
BYD.
Drivers from both of these brands are annoying
basedKarmine wrote:
Tbh I'd choose Sport > luxury but...
Side note: For the love of god please change the grills. They (imo) look bad.
- Mercedes-Benz C36 - I like this mostly cuz of its' looks. It does fare well performance wise too though.
- Mercedes-Benz SL65 - a 6L V12 twin turbo. This thing had looks AND power.
Side note: For the love of god please change the grills. They (imo) look bad.
Or Lancia Deltaanaxii wrote:
Real car lovers will say the Fiat Multipla above all.
byd and huawei are like the two brands that… must not be commented
I can only say as much as I’m not a fan of either
I can only say as much as I’m not a fan of either
Topic Starter
when i went to china i bearly saw any huawei cars but most of the time I saw wuling, byd, xiaomi, beijing, and tesla.Arctos Sagittario wrote:
byd and huawei are like the two brands that… must not be commented
I can only say as much as I’m not a fan of either
mostly its all scooters prolly cuz i was in fuzhou
that’s because they don’t operate under huawei logo, name and badge. they have different brand names. but the catch is that they all operate as if they are huawei itselfAsian Warlord wrote:
when i went to china i bearly saw any huawei cars but most of the time I saw byd, xiaomi, beijing, and tesla.Arctos Sagittario wrote:
byd and huawei are like the two brands that… must not be commented
I can only say as much as I’m not a fan of either
mostly its all scooters prolly cuz i was in fuzhou
you may have come across some cars branded as aito or avatr, these two are huawei. there are 4 more of them but at much smaller volume on sales so you may not have seen them
no comment on this separation either…
Topic Starter
Also there’s almost always a g wagon every where I go either it’s the Chinese g wagon or Mercedes g wagon. They really love their g wagons I can’t blame them I lowkey want one myself
What about this? (looks undrivable in Europe)
wtf is the name of this monstrosity? Looks like a machine specially made to turn children into speed bumps.Corne2Plum3 wrote:
What about this? (looks undrivable in Europe)
Mercedes-AMG G 63 6x6hyperastro wrote:
wtf is the name of this monstrosity? Looks like a machine specially made to turn children into speed bumps.Corne2Plum3 wrote:
What about this? (looks undrivable in Europe)
maybe take care of your child and dont let it run loosehyperastro wrote:
wtf is the name of this monstrosity? Looks like a machine specially made to turn children into speed bumps.Corne2Plum3 wrote:
What about this? (looks undrivable in Europe)
Isn't it normal for kids to play in the street? There are some terriblePolyspora wrote:
maybe take care of your child and dont let it run loosehyperastro wrote:
wtf is the name of this monstrosity? Looks like a machine specially made to turn children into speed bumps.Corne2Plum3 wrote:
wow this escalated quickly...hyperastro wrote:
Isn't it normal for kids to play in the street? There are some terriblePolyspora wrote:
maybe take care of your child and dont let it run loosehyperastro wrote:
wtf is the name of this monstrosity? Looks like a machine specially made to turn children into speed bumps.Corne2Plum3 wrote:
womandrivers who drive at 75 next to parks and school zones. These types of cars just result in more fatal accidents imo.
are they james sumerton?Corne2Plum3 wrote:
wow this escalated quickly...hyperastro wrote:
Isn't it normal for kids to play in the street? There are some terriblePolyspora wrote:
maybe take care of your child and dont let it run loosehyperastro wrote:
wtf is the name of this monstrosity? Looks like a machine specially made to turn children into speed bumps.Corne2Plum3 wrote:
womandrivers who drive at 75 next to parks and school zones. These types of cars just result in more fatal accidents imo.
then its the speed's fault not the size of the car, still you should never allow your kid to cross the street alone.hyperastro wrote:
Isn't it normal for kids to play in the street? There are some terriblePolyspora wrote:
maybe take care of your child and dont let it run loosehyperastro wrote:
wtf is the name of this monstrosity? Looks like a machine specially made to turn children into speed bumps.Corne2Plum3 wrote:
womandrivers who drive at 75 next to parks and school zones. These types of cars just result in more fatal accidents imo.
Bro what are you on? If a pick-up truck runs over you, you are a gone. Smaller cars like in the EU make it so people fall onto the hood of the car which increases survivability. Bigger cars just sweep over you and turn you into a pancake.Polyspora wrote:
then its the speed's fault not the size of the car, still you should never allow your kid to cross the street alone.hyperastro wrote:
Isn't it normal for kids to play in the street? There are some terriblePolyspora wrote:
maybe take care of your child and dont let it run loosehyperastro wrote:
wtf is the name of this monstrosity? Looks like a machine specially made to turn children into speed bumps.Corne2Plum3 wrote:
womandrivers who drive at 75 next to parks and school zones. These types of cars just result in more fatal accidents imo.
thats not the point, we're talking about kids, any car tower over kids, the example you gave me the person was breaking a major law (going 75 in a school zone), if something were to happen it didnt have to do with the size of the car, but the speed it was going.hyperastro wrote:
Bro what are you on? If a pick-up truck runs over you, you are a gone. Smaller cars like in the EU make it so people fall onto the hood of the car which increases survivability. Bigger cars just sweep over you and turn you into a pancake.Polyspora wrote:
then its the speed's fault not the size of the car, still you should never allow your kid to cross the street alone.hyperastro wrote:
Isn't it normal for kids to play in the street? There are some terriblePolyspora wrote:
maybe take care of your child and dont let it run loosehyperastro wrote:
wtf is the name of this monstrosity? Looks like a machine specially made to turn children into speed bumps.Corne2Plum3 wrote:
womandrivers who drive at 75 next to parks and school zones. These types of cars just result in more fatal accidents imo.
sincerely every time someone tries to defend why big trucks are bad they just end up sounding like a butthurt karen trying to ruin someones joy.
Do you know why cars in the US are so big to begin with? Its not because its cool. Its because of a psuedo-loophole to cheat emition standards. If big cars were so advantageous don't you think they would be allowed in the whole world and not just in the USA and 3rd world countries?Polyspora wrote:
thats not the point, we're talking about kids, any car tower over kids, the example you gave me the person was breaking a major law (going 75 in a school zone), if something were to happen it didnt have to do with the size of the car, but the speed it was going.hyperastro wrote:
Bro what are you on? If a pick-up truck runs over you, you are a gone. Smaller cars like in the EU make it so people fall onto the hood of the car which increases survivability. Bigger cars just sweep over you and turn you into a pancake.Polyspora wrote:
then its the speed's fault not the size of the car, still you should never allow your kid to cross the street alone.hyperastro wrote:
Isn't it normal for kids to play in the street? There are some terriblePolyspora wrote:
maybe take care of your child and dont let it run loosehyperastro wrote:
wtf is the name of this monstrosity? Looks like a machine specially made to turn children into speed bumps.Corne2Plum3 wrote:
womandrivers who drive at 75 next to parks and school zones. These types of cars just result in more fatal accidents imo.
sincerely every time someone tries to defend why big trucks are bad they just end up sounding like a butthurt karen trying to ruin someones joy.
Fiat Punto
I agree with hyperastro here, big cars fucking suck, also, believe it or not, in smaller cars you CAN see a kid, it doesn't have as much of a blind spot, here is a comparasion charthyperastro wrote:
Do you know why cars in the US are so big to begin with? Its not because its cool. Its because of a psuedo-loophole to cheat emition standards. If big cars were so advantageous don't you think they would be allowed in the whole world and not just in the USA and 3rd world countries?Polyspora wrote:
thats not the point, we're talking about kids, any car tower over kids, the example you gave me the person was breaking a major law (going 75 in a school zone), if something were to happen it didnt have to do with the size of the car, but the speed it was going.hyperastro wrote:
Bro what are you on? If a pick-up truck runs over you, you are a gone. Smaller cars like in the EU make it so people fall onto the hood of the car which increases survivability. Bigger cars just sweep over you and turn you into a pancake.Polyspora wrote:
then its the speed's fault not the size of the car, still you should never allow your kid to cross the street alone.hyperastro wrote:
Isn't it normal for kids to play in the street? There are some terriblePolyspora wrote:
maybe take care of your child and dont let it run loosehyperastro wrote:
wtf is the name of this monstrosity? Looks like a machine specially made to turn children into speed bumps.Corne2Plum3 wrote:
womandrivers who drive at 75 next to parks and school zones. These types of cars just result in more fatal accidents imo.
sincerely every time someone tries to defend why big trucks are bad they just end up sounding like a butthurt karen trying to ruin someones joy.
also, outside of emission, and being harder to spot kids/people in wheelchairs on the road, you also require more parking space, and wider roads, which may not sound like a problem in the american continent, but, here in europe that a lot of cities are essentially expanded and repurpoused medieval cities, road width is a heavy concern.
Also, in terms of a car crash, if you were to be on a SUV, you would be inflicting more damage on the other car, which if it's a small car, then that person is FUCKED
AMG, of course. The above one is out of any competitions/comparisons.
ok so you'll just completely ignore the main topic of children and attack directly the idea of a big truck with anything you got at hand, got youhyperastro wrote:
Do you know why cars in the US are so big to begin with? Its not because its cool. Its because of a psuedo-loophole to cheat emition standards. If big cars were so advantageous don't you think they would be allowed in the whole world and not just in the USA and 3rd world countries?Polyspora wrote:
thats not the point, we're talking about kids, any car tower over kids, the example you gave me the person was breaking a major law (going 75 in a school zone), if something were to happen it didnt have to do with the size of the car, but the speed it was going.hyperastro wrote:
Bro what are you on? If a pick-up truck runs over you, you are a gone. Smaller cars like in the EU make it so people fall onto the hood of the car which increases survivability. Bigger cars just sweep over you and turn you into a pancake.Polyspora wrote:
then its the speed's fault not the size of the car, still you should never allow your kid to cross the street alone.hyperastro wrote:
Isn't it normal for kids to play in the street? There are some terriblePolyspora wrote:
maybe take care of your child and dont let it run loosehyperastro wrote:
wtf is the name of this monstrosity? Looks like a machine specially made to turn children into speed bumps.Corne2Plum3 wrote:
womandrivers who drive at 75 next to parks and school zones. These types of cars just result in more fatal accidents imo.
sincerely every time someone tries to defend why big trucks are bad they just end up sounding like a butthurt karen trying to ruin someones joy.
if you go to any rural area, these trucks literally rule, they can carry you and your mom without a sweat and go over just about any obstacle. So if they can be useful as fuck, cool as fuck and still cast a "fuck you" to the most oppressive retarded law created thats just a win win in my book.
also if by "the whole world and not just 3rd world countries" you mean europe, yeah they're allowed in there, its just a pain to get it because of bureaucracy, you guys love that.
cars in the us used to be smaller but demand drove car sizes up
how many can i drink until i end up in the hospitalnullpointer wrote:
AMG, of course. The above one is out of any competitions/comparisons.
if the blind spot was a real concerning problem, why shouldnt we ban buses and semi trucks as well?Patatitta wrote:
I agree with hyperastro here, big cars fucking suck, also, believe it or not, in smaller cars you CAN see a kid, it doesn't have as much of a blind spot, here is a comparasion charthyperastro wrote:
Do you know why cars in the US are so big to begin with? Its not because its cool. Its because of a psuedo-loophole to cheat emition standards. If big cars were so advantageous don't you think they would be allowed in the whole world and not just in the USA and 3rd world countries?Polyspora wrote:
thats not the point, we're talking about kids, any car tower over kids, the example you gave me the person was breaking a major law (going 75 in a school zone), if something were to happen it didnt have to do with the size of the car, but the speed it was going.hyperastro wrote:
Bro what are you on? If a pick-up truck runs over you, you are a gone. Smaller cars like in the EU make it so people fall onto the hood of the car which increases survivability. Bigger cars just sweep over you and turn you into a pancake.Polyspora wrote:
then its the speed's fault not the size of the car, still you should never allow your kid to cross the street alone.hyperastro wrote:
Isn't it normal for kids to play in the street? There are some terriblePolyspora wrote:
maybe take care of your child and dont let it run loosehyperastro wrote:
wtf is the name of this monstrosity? Looks like a machine specially made to turn children into speed bumps.Corne2Plum3 wrote:
womandrivers who drive at 75 next to parks and school zones. These types of cars just result in more fatal accidents imo.
sincerely every time someone tries to defend why big trucks are bad they just end up sounding like a butthurt karen trying to ruin someones joy.
also, outside of emission, and being harder to spot kids/people in wheelchairs on the road, you also require more parking space, and wider roads, which may not sound like a problem in the american continent, but, here in europe that a lot of cities are essentially expanded and repurpoused medieval cities, road width is a heavy concern.
Also, in terms of a car crash, if you were to be on a SUV, you would be inflicting more damage on the other car, which if it's a small car, then that person is FUCKED
all of the examples you gave me also could be used on those two vehicles I quoted above, yet they're not banned because they are extremely helpful to the general population. this whole thing just feels like an attack on the end user to be fair, next up you're going to tell me how much of an asshole everyone who drive trucks are, and use that as a reason to ban them, as if the truck caused the behavior.
also lets not talk about the poor medieval cities changing like you guys gave a damn and werent actively trying to distance yourselves and shun europe from the past.
obs: that chart doesnt feel reliable at all, but I'm not sure how to pinpoint what is wrong with it lol.
I like my Volkswagen Touran 2005 1.9 TDI, idc for other cars.
banger engineJun Maeda wrote:
I like my Volkswagen Touran 2005 1.9 TDI, idc for other cars.
hmmm idk tbh have bmw partnered with mitsubishi to make a limited edition 6th gen galant?
mercedes doesn't feel good to drive and has horrible interior, but at least they look slightly better on the outside than most of the new bmws
would still go with a bmw for the driving feeling even despite the exterior looks
i am very objective and unbiased
would still go with a bmw for the driving feeling even despite the exterior looks
i am very objective and unbiased
All this headache when you could just get a Suzuki Swift.
Karmine wrote:
All this headache when you could just get a Suzuki Swift.
Uhhh Toyota Hilux exists? I doubt you NEED Ford F-150, which is larger than M4 Sherman tank, to carry you and your mom without a sweat and go over just about any obstacle (although I admit that it looks cool).Polyspora wrote:
hyperastro wrote:
Do you know why cars in the US are so big to begin with? Its not because its cool. Its because of a psuedo-loophole to cheat emition standards. If big cars were so advantageous don't you think they would be allowed in the whole world and not just in the USA and 3rd world countries?Polyspora wrote:
thats not the point, we're talking about kids, any car tower over kids, the example you gave me the person was breaking a major law (going 75 in a school zone), if something were to happen it didnt have to do with the size of the car, but the speed it was going.hyperastro wrote:
Bro what are you on? If a pick-up truck runs over you, you are a gone. Smaller cars like in the EU make it so people fall onto the hood of the car which increases survivability. Bigger cars just sweep over you and turn you into a pancake.Polyspora wrote:
then its the speed's fault not the size of the car, still you should never allow your kid to cross the street alone.hyperastro wrote:
Isn't it normal for kids to play in the street? There are some terriblePolyspora wrote:
maybe take care of your child and dont let it run loosehyperastro wrote:
wtf is the name of this monstrosity? Looks like a machine specially made to turn children into speed bumps.Corne2Plum3 wrote:
womandrivers who drive at 75 next to parks and school zones. These types of cars just result in more fatal accidents imo.
sincerely every time someone tries to defend why big trucks are bad they just end up sounding like a butthurt karen trying to ruin someones joy.
ok so you'll just completely ignore the main topic of children and attack directly the idea of a big truck with anything you got at hand, got you
if you go to any rural area, these trucks literally rule, they can carry you and your mom without a sweat and go over just about any obstacle. So if they can be useful as fuck, cool as fuck and still cast a "fuck you" to the most oppressive retarded law created thats just a win win in my book.
also if by "the whole world and not just 3rd world countries" you mean europe, yeah they're allowed in there, its just a pain to get it because of bureaucracy, you guys love that.
Debate over. I choose BMW. My wallet is not gonna be happy.
Nice point, HOWEVER...Jangsooodlor wrote:
Uhhh Toyota Hilux exists? I doubt you NEED Ford F-150, which is larger than M4 Sherman tank, to carry you and your mom without a sweat and go over just about any obstacle (although I admit that it looks cool).
HOW ELSE WILL WE USE NORTH AMERICA'S BIG ROADS TO THEIR FULLEST??