Shuuten no Saki ga Aru to Suru naraba.Explicit

00:12:368 (12368|5) - Is this a dump note to avoid a density drop? Then 00:16:453 should probably also have a note, very similar case.

00:20:155 - LN idea in this section is quite unclear to me. I can tell which sounds they refer to individually but they appear selectively only for some vocal or piano sounds, and it doesn't make sense to me as a whole.

For example, you could add LNs for piano at 00:24:240 - 00:24:750 - 00:25:261 - 00:25:772, then it kinda alternates with vocal LNs.
Then 00:27:304 (27304|0,27559|2,27814|3,28070|4) - should look more like 00:23:219 (23219|5,23219|3,23474|4,23474|2,23729|1,23729|3) - for consistency.
And finally, at 00:28:325 it's better to remove LN and focus on repetitive guitar sounds with some kind of anchor. It feels like a different pattern anyway cuz all other vocal notes are rice.

00:23:729 (23729|6) - I think this part can be 1/2 LN if you intend to emphasize piano sounds.

00:23:729 (23729|6,95219|3,95346|4,95474|5,95602|6) - I think these note can be also 1/2 LN that you made at 01:31:133 (91133|3,91261|4,91389|5,91516|4).

00:34:453 (34453|0,34453|5,34453|4,34453|6,34580|3) - Any reason for this to be different from 00:36:495 (36495|0,36495|1,36495|2,36495|6,36623|4) - ? Imo second pattern is cleaner, I'd prefer it in both cases.

00:53:091 - is it intended not to make vocal LN in here?

01:02:027 - There's a problem similar to #4558440, except it's not so easily fixed. You really need to think of some concept for LN usage and not just throw them in here and there. Feel free to poke me if you have no idea what to do with this, i'll help you remap the section.

01:30:240 - I can hear main sound in here, is it intended not to add LN?

01:30:495 (90495|0) - I think you mispointed main sound. 3/2 LN should be 01:30:623 and this note should be reduced to 1/2 LN.

01:30:623 - Should be another LN here, sound is different from 01:30:495 (90495|0) -

01:31:772 (91772|4,92027|2) - seems fair pattern but you made 1/2 LN trill at 02:33:942 (153942|2,154070|4,154197|3,154197|2,154325|4) - almost same musical phase. I think it maybe better to choose one pattern for better consistency.

01:39:814 (99814|4,100836|2) - intended or not, there is no LN for main sound; imo I don't think this doesn't hate gameplay in Insane diff, consider to add this.

01:59:346 (119346|6,119346|5,119474|2,119474|0,119474|1,119474|3,119474|4) - subjective idea; seems too uncomfortable pattern, I think you can make like 01:02:027 (62027|3,62027|0,62027|6,62027|1,62027|5) - , please check this

02:12:495 (132495|5,132750|4,133006|3,133261|2) - my subjective suggestion; I think this piano sound doesn't need to emphasize LN considering it is minor part, emphasizing main piano sound part 02:09:431 (129431|3,129431|1,129942|2,129942|4,130453|3,130453|5,130963|4,130963|6) - is enough imo.

02:22:453 (142453|3,142708|3,142963|3,143219|3,143474|3,143729|3) - I think this anchor isn't intended, try to distribute other cols. I can suggest like this:

this should be 1/4 not 1/6 02:34:904 - same with top diff

02:37:070 (157070|3,157133|4,157197|5,157261|6,157325|0,157389|1,157453|2) - seems inconsistent express; top diff and other part in this diff (00:07:389 (7389|4) - ) didn't used 1/4 stream to emphasize piano sound.

Imo, I can suggest replacing double LN and adding 1/4 at top diff seems fair because I can see 02:27:431 - 02:28:708 part, you didn't add any piano sound in this diff, but not in top diff.

02:45:814 (165814|4,165942|4) - 02:43:772 (163772|4,163899|4) - 02:45:814 (165814|4,165942|4) - 02:47:857 (167857|2,167985|2) - just curious; are these minijacks intended? It feels awkward considering that whole concept is stream, and no musically repeating the sound.