mapped by Turrim
submitted
last updated
This beatmap wasn't updated since 10 September 2024 so it was graveyarded...
New Discussion
Please sign in to post or reply
Discussions
Sort by

00:15:814 (15814|4,15942|4) - imo I don't think this minijack is unnecessary, considering only made it at W hitsound

permalink
permalink
permalink

applied it

permalink
Marked as resolved by Turrim

00:30:112 (30112|3,30112|5,30112|4) - subjective suggestion; maybe better to emphasize 56 LN instead considering musical phase, also not breaking concept imo

permalink
permalink

applied it

permalink
Marked as resolved by Turrim

I feel like this should be a double not a triple imo 00:31:772 -

permalink

changed double 00:31:772 -
and are other sections with the same rhythm okay? 01:25:899 - 02:27:176 -

permalink

yo mb i meant to do this one 00:32:027 - 😅

permalink

imma little tired man disregard this suggustion and apply this to hard mb again lol

permalink

ok bro I'll be waiting for your mod

permalink
Marked as resolved by Turrim

00:34:389 (34389|2) - I'm not sure what sound is expressing. Should it be 00:34:325?

permalink

that note was meant to express the guitar's vibration, but since it feels ambiguous, i will delete it

permalink
Marked as resolved by Turrim

00:36:240 (36240|4) - is this intended 1/1 LN? Insane diff used 1/2 instead.

permalink

applied it

permalink
Marked as resolved by Turrim

00:39:814 (39814|4) - I think you should change to normal note if you want to emphasize cymbal sound.

permalink

00:40:070 (40070|5) - that note is meant to express the short vocal, similar to this LN

permalink
Marked as resolved by Turrim

00:53:857 (53857|1,53857|5,53857|6,53857|0) - maybe better to make 1/2 LN instead of rice, considering that you made 00:56:921 (56921|0,56921|1,56921|5,56921|6) -

permalink

applied it

permalink
Marked as resolved by Turrim

00:57:814 (57814|2) - this 1/1 size seems slightly weird IMO, what about cut to 1/2 LN instead?

permalink

applied it

permalink
Marked as resolved by Turrim

00:59:729 - 00:59:857 - subjective idea, I think this vocal should be more powerful, not only one LN. I think double LN doesn't breaking your idea imo

permalink

applied it

permalink
Marked as resolved by Turrim

01:12:240 vs 01:12:750 vs 01:13:261 all have the same set of sounds (vocal + piano + uhh bass I think?), so how's the LN count is different for all three? :3c

permalink

Also 01:14:410 (74410|2) - should be LN for vocal

permalink

02:09:431 - Same

permalink

I tried to express the jack with rice notes simultaneously, but the arrangement got messed up, and I'm not sure how many LNs would be best for consistency. For now, I'll match the consistency with 2 1/1 LNs

01:14:410 (74410|2) - 02:11:602 (131602|4) - changed to 1/2 LN

permalink
Marked as resolved by Turrim

01:18:240 (78240|0,78304|1,78368|0,78368|2) - 1/4 half-brackets feel a bit too straining here, I'd avoid them. You can nerf the chord or just move 01:18:368 (78368|0) - to 6 and 01:18:495 (78495|5) - to 3.

permalink
permalink

Instead of weakening the chord, I'll follow your suggestion and adjust the placement

permalink
Marked as resolved by Turrim

01:29:602 - Not sure you can get away with arbitrarily switching from 1 LN to 2 LNs (still occasionally having one LN somewhere like 01:30:240 (90240|1,90495|0,90623|5,91006|0) - 01:33:304 (93304|4,93431|3,93559|2) - ), then back to 1 LN at 01:35:219. I guess 01:35:219 is where new phrase starts, so you can switch there for variety but it still feels weird. And if you want to keep 2 LN section anyway, it should start at 01:27:559 and be consistent.

permalink

01:27:048 (87048|1,87176|2,87304|3,87431|4) - vs 01:29:219 (89219|5,89346|4,89474|3) - vs 01:31:133 (91133|1,91197|2,91261|6,91261|3,91389|5,91389|2,91516|1,91516|4) - are all different too. It's not critical by itself cuz you could consider those transitions and have some variety there for fun. But this kind of variety should be on top of a solid structure. There are just too many varying parts here which makes the base structure weaker imo.

permalink

01:27:559 - I changed it to maintain consistency with 2 LNs throughout
====
01:30:240 (90240|1,90495|0,90623|5,91006|0) - For the section at 01:30:240 (90240|1,90495|0,90623|5,91006|0), I changed 01:31:006 (91006|0) to a rice note and kept the rest as is, aiming to give a sense of a break in the progression
====
vs ... vs... - I changed it to a 1/2 LN staircase pattern for consistency
01:27:048 (87048|1,87176|2,87304|3,87431|4) - However, since the sound here doesn't feel particularly strong, I'll keep it as a single note

permalink
Marked as resolved by Turrim

01:30:240 (90240|0,90368|0,90495|0) - this sounds more like 2 sounds than 3, even if there's 3 sounds it's not as clear as sounds like 01:28:836 (88836|6,88963|6), jacking them seems to be a bit overkil and I would just recommend removing 01:30:368 (90368|0) and extending the previous LN so that it's 2 active object instead.

permalink

Instead of removing the jack, I extended the LN sound expression on the guitar from 01:30:240 (90240|1) to 01:30:431. I changed it like this because I thought it would be better to extend it to one LN rather than two LNs in terms of visibility.
and I also changed the col of LN ( 1col->2col ) because I checked that the pitch of the negative is also different after listening to you again

permalink
Marked as resolved by Turrim

01:37:389 (97389|2,97516|1,97644|0,97772|0) - these 4 sounds are kinda like 01:29:219 (89219|5,89346|4,89474|3,89602|2,89602|0), and I think they should be consistent, or at least 01:37:644 (97644|0,97772|0) - this jack should be gotten rid of cuz 01:37:772 - is on another pitch

permalink

<(32123) Changed to the shape stair structure LN

permalink
Marked as resolved by Turrim

01:38:665 - the triple 1/4LN expressed for guitar slide is absence here, inconsistent with 01:30:495 (90495|2,90559|3,90623|4). I personally think the guitar 1/4 guitar slide is a bit overkill and can be removed cuz it isn't as obvious as 01:30:495 (90495|2,90559|3,90623|4,94708|1,94793|2,94878|3,94963|1,95048|2,95133|3) - , and guitar is just presented everywhere in this song.

permalink

1/4 snap LN might be an overstatement, but for consistency, I think it would be better to switch to 1/4 snap rather than erase it.
I think the expression of the guitar solo accompaniment part of this part is important, so I will change it to 1/4 snap LN

permalink
Marked as resolved by Turrim

01:44:410 (104410|6) - I'm not sure about this 1/2 LN, if you intended piano sound, it should be rice that you emphasized 01:43:899, 01:45:431, 01:46:453

permalink

applied it

permalink
Marked as resolved by Turrim

no sound here, so i would suggest deleting this note 01:48:453 -

permalink

That placement is intentional, to reflect the division in the guitar sound. I placed it there to convey the feeling of the guitar sound being divided.

permalink
Marked as resolved by Turrim

this should just be 1/4 note 1/8 01:49:421 -

permalink

#4400754/11709363
most of the time, the reason I make such placements is to intentionally express the division of the guitar sound. If later on BN or similar individuals find issues with those parts, I'll revise them overall.

permalink
Marked as resolved by Turrim

01:49:516 (109516|6,109516|5,109516|4,109580|3,109580|0,109644|4,109644|1,109772|5,109772|0,109772|2,109836|3,109836|6,109899|2,109899|4) - this is a bit of a spike cuz the entire section is just filled with super simple rolls, whilst the introduction of bracket trills is a bit abrupt and ruined the flow a lot. I suggest making this a simple roll as well, OR make this section filled with less simple rolls but a mix of both

permalink

I think the bracket pattern at that bpm level may be difficult. I changed the pattern for visibility and simple roll.

permalink
Marked as resolved by Turrim

01:49:772 (109772|6,109772|5,109899|5,109899|6) - IMO, this jack 1/2 is slightly right-hand based, I think you can avoid it with trill

here is my suggestion with pic

permalink

applied it

permalink
Marked as resolved by Turrim

02:12:495 - This looks like a lot of LNs compared to what comes next. It would be better for the flow to nerf some of them cuz the song doesn't call for this sudden change imo.

permalink

I kept one LN for the vocals and two LNs for the piano, and changed the rest to rice notes

permalink
Marked as resolved by Turrim

02:34:899 - Shouldn't there be a note for piano gliss?

permalink

02:34:899 - put 6col rice

permalink
Marked as resolved by Turrim

02:39:304 (159304|1,159431|2) - Guitar is doing 1/3 here. Seems like it's missed in Insane diff too.

permalink

I think expressing the 1/3 guitar rhythm in that section would make the drum chord placement awkward, so I'll keep it as it is for now

permalink
Marked as resolved by Turrim
/